1
|
Milbury K, Rosenthal DI, Li Y, Ngo-Huang AT, Mallaiah S, Yousuf S, Fuller CD, Lewis C, Bruera E, Cohen L. Dyadic Yoga for Head and Neck Cancer Patients Undergoing Chemoradiation and their Family Caregivers. J Pain Symptom Manage 2024; 67:490-500. [PMID: 38447621 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2024.02.565] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2023] [Revised: 02/19/2024] [Accepted: 02/27/2024] [Indexed: 03/08/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Concurrent chemoradiation to treat head and neck cancer (HNC) may result in debilitating toxicities. Targeted exercise such as yoga therapy may buffer against treatment-related sequelae; thus, this pilot RCT examined the feasibility and preliminary efficacy of a yoga intervention. Because family caregivers report low caregiving efficacy and elevated levels of distress, we included them in this trial as active study participants. METHODS HNC patients and their caregivers were randomized to a 15-session dyadic yoga program or a waitlist control (WLC) group. Prior to randomization, patients completed standard symptom (MDASI-HN) and patients and caregivers completed quality of life (SF-36) assessments. The 15-session program was delivered parallel to patients' treatment schedules. Participants were re-assessed at patients' last day of chemoradiation and again 30 days later. Patients' emergency department visits, unplanned hospital admissions and gastric feeding tube placements were recorded over the treatment course and up to 30 days later. RESULTS With a consent rate of 76%, 37 dyads were randomized. Participants in the yoga group completed a mean of 12.5 sessions and rated the program as "beneficial." Patients in the yoga group had clinically significantly less symptom interference and HNC symptom severity and better QOL than those in the WLC group. They were also less likely to have a hospital admission (OR = 3.00), emergency department visit (OR = 2.14), and/or a feeding tube placement (OR = 1.78). CONCLUSION Yoga therapy appears to be a feasible, acceptable, and possibly efficacious behavioral supportive care strategy for HNC patients undergoing chemoradiation. A larger efficacy trial is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kathrin Milbury
- Department of Behavioral Science (K.M., S.Y.), 1155 Pressler St., Houston, Texas 77030, USA.
| | - David I Rosenthal
- Department of Radiation Oncology (D.I.R., C.D.F.), 1515 Holcombe Blvd., Houston, Texas 77030, USA
| | - Yisheng Li
- Department of Biostatistics (Y.L.), 1515 Holcombe Blvd., Houston, Texas 77030, USA
| | - An Thuy Ngo-Huang
- Department of Palliative, Rehabilitation & Integrative Medicine (A.T.N.-H., S.M., E.B.,L.C.), 1515 Holcombe Blvd., Houston, Texas 77030, USA
| | - Smitha Mallaiah
- Department of Palliative, Rehabilitation & Integrative Medicine (A.T.N.-H., S.M., E.B.,L.C.), 1515 Holcombe Blvd., Houston, Texas 77030, USA
| | - Sania Yousuf
- Department of Behavioral Science (K.M., S.Y.), 1155 Pressler St., Houston, Texas 77030, USA
| | - Clifton D Fuller
- Department of Radiation Oncology (D.I.R., C.D.F.), 1515 Holcombe Blvd., Houston, Texas 77030, USA
| | - Carol Lewis
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery (C.L.), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd., Houston, Texas 77030, USA
| | - Eduardo Bruera
- Department of Palliative, Rehabilitation & Integrative Medicine (A.T.N.-H., S.M., E.B.,L.C.), 1515 Holcombe Blvd., Houston, Texas 77030, USA
| | - Lorenzo Cohen
- Department of Palliative, Rehabilitation & Integrative Medicine (A.T.N.-H., S.M., E.B.,L.C.), 1515 Holcombe Blvd., Houston, Texas 77030, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Koutroumpakis E, Mohamed ASR, Chaftari P, Rosenthal DI, Gujral D, Nutting C, Kamel S, Naser MA, Kim P, Bassett R, Fuller CD, Mouhayar E. Longitudinal changes in the carotid arteries of head and neck cancer patients following radiation therapy: Results from a prospective serial imaging biomarker characterization study. Radiother Oncol 2024; 195:110220. [PMID: 38467343 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2024.110220] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/25/2023] [Revised: 03/05/2024] [Accepted: 03/08/2024] [Indexed: 03/13/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION We prospectively evaluated morphologic and functional changes in the carotid arteries of patients treated with unilateral neck radiation therapy (RT) for head and neck cancer. METHODS Bilateral carotid artery duplex studies were performed at 0, 3, 6, 12, 18 months and 2, 3, 4, and 5 years following RT. Intima media thickness (IMT); global and regional circumferential, as well as radial strain, arterial elasticity, stiffness, and distensibility were calculated. RESULTS Thirty-eight patients were included. A significant difference in the IMT from baseline between irradiated and unirradiated carotid arteries was detected at 18 months (median, 0.073 mm vs -0.003 mm; P = 0.014), which increased at 3 and 4 years (0.128 mm vs 0.013 mm, P = 0.016, and 0.177 mm vs 0.023 mm, P = 0.0002, respectively). A significant transient change was noted in global circumferential strain between the irradiated and unirradiated arteries at 6 months (median difference, -0.89, P = 0.023), which did not persist. No significant differences were detected in the other measures of elasticity, stiffness, and distensibility. CONCLUSIONS Functional and morphologic changes of the carotid arteries detected by carotid ultrasound, such as changes in global circumferential strain at 6 months and carotid IMT at 18 months, may be useful for the early detection of radiation-induced carotid artery injury, can guide future research aiming to mitigate carotid artery stenosis, and should be considered for clinical surveillance survivorship recommendations after head and neck RT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Efstratios Koutroumpakis
- Department of Cardiology, Division of Internal Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | | | - Peter Chaftari
- Department of Cardiology, Division of Internal Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - David I Rosenthal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Dorothy Gujral
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation, London, United Kingdom
| | | | - Serageldin Kamel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Mohamed A Naser
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Peter Kim
- Department of Cardiology, Division of Internal Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Roland Bassett
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Clifton D Fuller
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
| | - Elie Mouhayar
- Department of Cardiology, Division of Internal Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Cohen L, Danhauer SC, Garcia MK, Dressler EV, Rosenthal DI, Chambers MS, Cusimano A, Brown WM, Ochoa JM, Yang P, Chiang JS, Gordon O, Crutcher R, Kim JK, Russin MP, Lukenbill J, Porosnicu M, Yost KJ, Weaver KE, Lesser GJ. Acupuncture for Chronic Radiation-Induced Xerostomia in Head and Neck Cancer: A Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw Open 2024; 7:e2410421. [PMID: 38739392 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.10421] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/14/2024] Open
Abstract
Importance Patients with head and neck cancer who undergo radiotherapy can develop chronic radiation-induced xerostomia. Prior acupuncture studies were single center and rated as having high risk of bias, making it difficult to know the benefits of acupuncture for treating radiation-induced xerostomia. Objective To compare true acupuncture (TA), sham acupuncture (SA), and standard oral hygiene (SOH) for treating radiation-induced xerostomia. Design, Setting, and Participants A randomized, blinded, 3-arm, placebo-controlled trial was conducted between July 29, 2013, and June 9, 2021. Data analysis was performed from March 9, 2022, through May 17, 2023. Patients reporting grade 2 or 3 radiation-induced xerostomia 12 months or more postradiotherapy for head and neck cancer were recruited from community-based cancer centers across the US that were part of the Wake Forest National Cancer Institute Community Oncology Research Program Research Base. Participants had received bilateral radiotherapy with no history of xerostomia. Interventions Participants received SOH and were randomized to TA, SA, or SOH only. Participants in the TA and SA cohorts were treated 2 times per week for 4 weeks. Those experiencing a minor response received another 4 weeks of treatment. Main Outcomes and Measures Patient-reported outcomes for xerostomia (Xerostomia Questionnaire, primary outcome) and quality of life (Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General) were collected at baseline, 4 (primary time point), 8, 12, and 26 weeks. All analyses were intention to treat. Results A total of 258 patients (201 men [77.9%]; mean [SD] age, 65.0 [9.16] years), participated from 33 sites across 13 states. Overall, 86 patients were assigned to each study arm. Mean (SD) years from diagnosis was 4.21 (3.74) years, 67.1% (n = 173) had stage IV disease. At week 4, Xerostomia Questionnaire scores revealed significant between-group differences, with lower Xerostomia Questionnaire scores with TA vs SOH (TA: 50.6; SOH: 57.3; difference, -6.67; 95% CI, -11.08 to -2.27; P = .003), and differences between TA and SA (TA: 50.6; SA: 55.0; difference, -4.41; 95% CI, -8.62 to -0.19; P = .04) yet did not reach statistical significance after adjustment for multiple comparisons. There was no significant difference between SA and SOH. Group differences in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General scores revealed statistically significant group differences at week 4, with higher scores with TA vs SOH (TA: 101.6; SOH: 97.7; difference, 3.91; 95% CI, 1.43-6.38; P = .002) and at week 12, with higher scores with TA vs SA (TA: 102.1; SA: 98.4; difference, 3.64; 95% CI, 1.10-6.18; P = .005) and TA vs SOH (TA: 102.1; SOH: 97.4; difference, 4.61; 95% CI, 1.99-7.23; P = .001). Conclusions and Relevance The findings of this trial suggest that TA was more effective in treating chronic radiation-induced xerostomia 1 or more years after the end of radiotherapy than SA or SOH. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02589938.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lorenzo Cohen
- Department of Palliative, Rehabilitation, and Integrative Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Suzanne C Danhauer
- Department of Social Sciences & Health Policy, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
| | - M Kay Garcia
- Department of Palliative, Rehabilitation, and Integrative Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Emily V Dressler
- Department of Biostatistics & Data Science, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
| | - David I Rosenthal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Mark S Chambers
- Department of Dental Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Andrew Cusimano
- Department of Palliative, Rehabilitation, and Integrative Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - W Mark Brown
- Department of Biostatistics & Data Science, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
| | - Jewel M Ochoa
- Department of Palliative, Rehabilitation, and Integrative Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Peiying Yang
- Department of Palliative, Rehabilitation, and Integrative Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Joseph S Chiang
- Department of Anesthesiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Ora Gordon
- Disney Family Cancer Center, Department of Integrative Medicine, Providence St Joseph Medical Center, Burbank, California
| | - Rhonda Crutcher
- Disney Family Cancer Center, Department of Integrative Medicine, Providence St Joseph Medical Center, Burbank, California
| | - Jung K Kim
- Disney Family Cancer Center, Department of Integrative Medicine, Providence St Joseph Medical Center, Burbank, California
| | - Michael P Russin
- Medical Oncology and Hematology, Kaiser Permanente Diablo Service Area, Martinez, California
| | | | - Mercedes Porosnicu
- Section on Hematology & Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
| | - Kathleen J Yost
- Cancer Research Consortium of West Michigan NCORP, Spectrum Health at Butterworth Campus, Grand Rapids
| | - Kathryn E Weaver
- Department of Social Sciences & Health Policy, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
| | - Glenn J Lesser
- Section on Hematology & Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Gharzai LA, Morris E, Suresh K, Nguyen-Tân PF, Rosenthal DI, Gillison ML, Harari PM, Garden AS, Koyfman S, Caudell JJ, Jones CU, Mitchell DL, Krempl G, Ridge JA, Gensheimer MF, Bonner JA, Filion E, Dunlap NE, Stokes WA, Le QT, Torres-Saavedra P, Mierzwa M, Schipper MJ. Surrogate endpoints in clinical trials of p16-positive squamous cell carcinoma of the oropharynx: an individual patient data meta-analysis. Lancet Oncol 2024; 25:366-375. [PMID: 38423050 PMCID: PMC10962533 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(24)00016-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/09/2023] [Revised: 12/19/2023] [Accepted: 01/09/2024] [Indexed: 03/02/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The increased incidence of human papillomavirus (HPV)-related cancers has motivated efforts to optimise treatment for these patients with excellent prognosis. Validation of surrogates for overall survival could expedite the investigation of new therapies. We sought to evaluate candidate intermediate clinical endpoints in trials assessing definitive treatment of p16-positive oropharyngeal cancer with chemotherapy or radiotherapy. METHODS We did a retrospective review of five multicentre, randomised trials (NRG/RTOG 9003, 0129, 0234, 0522, and 1016) that tested radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy in patients (aged ≥18 years) with p16-positive localised head or neck squamous-cell carcinomas. Eight intermediate clinical endpoints were considered as potential surrogates for overall survival: freedom from local progression, freedom from regional progression, freedom from distant metastasis, freedom from locoregional progression, freedom from any progression, locoregional progression-free survival, progression-free survival, and distant metastasis-free survival. We used a two-stage meta-analytical framework, which requires high correlation between the intermediate clinical endpoint and overall survival at the patient level (condition 1), and high correlation between the treatment effect on the intermediate clinical endpoint and the treatment effect on overall survival (condition 2). For both, an r2 greater than 0·7 was used as criteria for clinically relevant surrogacy. FINDINGS We analysed 1373 patients with oropharyngeal cancer from May 9, 2020, to Nov 22, 2023. 1231 (90%) of patients were men, 142 (10%) were women, and 1207 (88%) were White, with a median age of 57 years (IQR 51-62). Median follow-up was 4·2 years (3·1-5·1). For the first condition, correlating the intermediate clinical endpoints with overall survival at the individual and trial level, the three composite endpoints of locoregional progression-free survival (Kendall's τ 0·91 and r2 0·72), distant metastasis-free survival (Kendall's τ 0·93 and r2 0·83), and progression-free survival (Kendall's τ 0·88 and r2 0·70) were highly correlated with overall survival at the patient level and at the trial-group level. For the second condition, correlating treatment effects of the intermediate clinical endpoints and overall survival, the composite endpoints of locoregional progression-free survival (r2 0·88), distant metastasis-free survival (r2 0·96), and progression-free survival (r2 0·92) remained strong surrogates. Treatment effects on the remaining intermediate clinical endpoints were less strongly correlated with overall survival. INTERPRETATION We identified locoregional progression-free survival, distant metastasis-free survival, and progression-free survival as surrogates for overall survival in p16-positive oropharyngeal cancers treated with chemotherapy or radiotherapy, which could serve as clinical trial endpoints. FUNDING NRG Oncology Operations, NRG Oncology SDMC, the National Cancer Institute, Eli Lilly, Aventis, and the University of Michigan.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laila A Gharzai
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Emily Morris
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Krithika Suresh
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Phuc Felix Nguyen-Tân
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM), Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - David I Rosenthal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Maura L Gillison
- Department of Thoracic and Head/Neck Medical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Paul M Harari
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Adam S Garden
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Shlomo Koyfman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Jimmy J Caudell
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Christopher U Jones
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sutter Cancer Research Consortium, Novato, CA, USA
| | - Darrion L Mitchell
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Greg Krempl
- Department of Otolaryngology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK, USA
| | - John A Ridge
- Department of Otolaryngology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | | | - James A Bonner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Alabama at Birmingham Medical Center, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Edith Filion
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM), Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Neal E Dunlap
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The James Graham Brown Cancer Center at University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA
| | - William A Stokes
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Quynh-Thu Le
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | | | - Michelle Mierzwa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Matthew J Schipper
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Salama V, Humbert-Vidan L, Godinich B, Wahid KA, ElHabashy DM, Naser MA, He R, Mohamed ASR, Sahli AJ, Hutcheson KA, Gunn GB, Rosenthal DI, Fuller CD, Moreno AC. Comparison of Machine Leaning Models for Prediction of Acute Pain Severity and On-Treatment Opioid Utilization in Oral Cavity and Oropharyngeal Cancer Patients Receiving Radiation Therapy: Exploratory Analysis from a Large-Scale Retrospective Cohort. medRxiv 2024:2024.02.06.24302341. [PMID: 38370746 PMCID: PMC10871386 DOI: 10.1101/2024.02.06.24302341] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/20/2024]
Abstract
Background Acute pain is a common and debilitating symptom experienced by oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancer (OC/OPC) patients undergoing radiation therapy (RT). Uncontrolled pain can result in opioid overuse and increased risks of long-term opioid dependence. The specific aim of this exploratory analysis was the prediction of severe acute pain and opioid use in the acute on-treatment setting, to develop risk-stratification models for pragmatic clinical trials. Materials and Methods A retrospective study was conducted on 900 OC/OPC patients treated with RT during 2017 to 2023. Clinical data including demographics, tumor data, pain scores and medication data were extracted from patient records. On-treatment pain intensity scores were assessed using a numeric rating scale (0-none, 10-worst) and total opioid doses were calculated using morphine equivalent daily dose (MEDD) conversion factors. Analgesics efficacy was assessed based on the combined pain intensity and the total required MEDD. ML models, including Logistic Regression (LR), Support Vector Machine (SVM), Random Forest (RF), and Gradient Boosting Model (GBM) were developed and validated using ten-fold cross-validation. Performance of models were evaluated using discrimination and calibration metrics. Feature importance was investigated using bootstrap and permutation techniques. Results For predicting acute pain intensity, the GBM demonstrated superior area under the receiver operating curve (AUC) (0.71), recall (0.39), and F1 score (0.48). For predicting the total MEDD, LR outperformed other models in the AUC (0.67). For predicting the analgesics efficacy, SVM achieved the highest specificity (0.97), and best calibration (ECE of 0.06), while RF and GBM achieved the same highest AUC, 0.68. RF model emerged as the best calibrated model with ECE of 0.02 for pain intensity prediction and 0.05 for MEDD prediction. Baseline pain scores and vital signs demonstrated the most contributed features for the different predictive models. Conclusion These ML models are promising in predicting end-of-treatment acute pain and opioid requirements and analgesics efficacy in OC/OPC patients undergoing RT. Baseline pain score, vital sign changes were identified as crucial predictors. Implementation of these models in clinical practice could facilitate early risk stratification and personalized pain management. Prospective multicentric studies and external validation are essential for further refinement and generalizability.
Collapse
|
6
|
Maroongroge S, Mohamed ASR, Nguyen C, Guma De la Vega J, Frank SJ, Garden AS, Gunn BG, Lee A, Mayo L, Moreno A, Morrison WH, Phan J, Spiotto MT, Court LE, Fuller CD, Rosenthal DI, Netherton TJ. Clinical acceptability of automatically generated lymph node levels and structures of deglutition and mastication for head and neck radiation therapy. Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol 2024; 29:100540. [PMID: 38356692 PMCID: PMC10864833 DOI: 10.1016/j.phro.2024.100540] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2023] [Revised: 01/22/2024] [Accepted: 01/24/2024] [Indexed: 02/16/2024] Open
Abstract
Background and Purpose Auto-contouring of complex anatomy in computed tomography (CT) scans is a highly anticipated solution to many problems in radiotherapy. In this study, artificial intelligence (AI)-based auto-contouring models were clinically validated for lymph node levels and structures of swallowing and chewing in the head and neck. Materials and Methods CT scans of 145 head and neck radiotherapy patients were retrospectively curated. One cohort (n = 47) was used to analyze seven lymph node levels and the other (n = 98) used to analyze 17 swallowing and chewing structures. Separate nnUnet models were trained and validated using the separate cohorts. For the lymph node levels, preference and clinical acceptability of AI vs human contours were scored. For the swallowing and chewing structures, clinical acceptability was scored. Quantitative analyses of the test sets were performed for AI vs human contours for all structures using overlap and distance metrics. Results Median Dice Similarity Coefficient ranged from 0.77 to 0.89 for lymph node levels and 0.86 to 0.96 for chewing and swallowing structures. The AI contours were superior to or equally preferred to the manual contours at rates ranging from 75% to 91%; there was not a significant difference in clinical acceptability for nodal levels I-V for manual versus AI contours. Across all AI-generated lymph node level contours, 92% were rated as usable with stylistic to no edits. Of the 340 contours in the chewing and swallowing cohort, 4% required minor edits. Conclusions An accurate approach was developed to auto-contour lymph node levels and chewing and swallowing structures on CT images for patients with intact nodal anatomy. Only a small portion of test set auto-contours required minor edits.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sean Maroongroge
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Division of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, United States
| | - Abdallah SR. Mohamed
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Division of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, United States
| | - Callistus Nguyen
- Department of Radiation Physics, Division of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, United States
| | - Jean Guma De la Vega
- Department of Radiation Physics, Division of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, United States
| | - Steven J. Frank
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Division of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, United States
| | - Adam S. Garden
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Division of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, United States
| | - Brandon G. Gunn
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Division of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, United States
| | - Anna Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Division of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, United States
| | - Lauren Mayo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Division of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, United States
| | - Amy Moreno
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Division of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, United States
| | - William H. Morrison
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Division of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, United States
| | - Jack Phan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Division of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, United States
| | - Michael T. Spiotto
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Division of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, United States
| | - Laurence E. Court
- Department of Radiation Physics, Division of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, United States
| | - Clifton D. Fuller
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Division of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, United States
| | - David I. Rosenthal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Division of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, United States
| | - Tucker J. Netherton
- Department of Radiation Physics, Division of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, United States
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Mohamed AS, Martin GV, Ng SP, Takiar V, Beadle BM, Zafereo M, Garden AS, Frank SJ, David Fuller C, Brandon Gunn G, Morrison WH, Rosenthal DI, Reddy J, Moreno A, Lee A, Phan J. Patterns of failure for recurrent head and neck squamous cell carcinoma treated with salvage surgery and postoperative IMRT reirradiation. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2024; 44:100700. [PMID: 38058404 PMCID: PMC10695834 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2023.100700] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2023] [Revised: 10/21/2023] [Accepted: 11/05/2023] [Indexed: 12/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose/Objectives The purpose of this study was to evaluate patterns of locoregional recurrence (LRR) after surgical salvage and adjuvant reirradiation with IMRT for recurrent head and neck squamous cell cancer (HNSCC). Materials/Methods Patterns of LRR for 61 patients treated consecutively between 2003 and 2014 who received post-operative IMRT reirradiation to ≥ 60 Gy for recurrent HNSCC were determined by 2 methods: 1) physician classification via visual comparison of post-radiotherapy imaging to reirradiation plans; and 2) using deformable image registration (DIR). Those without evaluable CT planning image data were excluded. All recurrences were verified by biopsy or radiological progression. Failures were defined as in-field, marginal, or out-of-field. Logistic regression analyses were performed to identify predictors for LRR. Results A total of 55 patients were eligible for analysis and 23 (42 %) had documented LRR after reirradiation. Location of recurrent disease prior to salvage surgery (lymphatic vs. mucosal) was the most significant predictor of LRR after post-operative reirradiation with salvage rate of 67 % for lymphatic vs. 33 % for mucosal sites (p = 0.037). Physician classification of LRR yielded 14 (61 %) in-field failures, 3 (13 %) marginal failures, and 6 (26 %) out-of-field failures, while DIR yielded 10 (44 %) in-field failures, 4 (17 %) marginal failures, and 9 (39 %) out-of-field failures. Most failures (57 %) occurred within the original site of recurrence or first echelon lymphatic drainage. Of patients who had a free flap placed during salvage surgery, 56 % of failures occurred within 1 cm of the surgical flap. Conclusion Our study highlights the role of DIR in enhancing the accuracy and consistency of POF analysis. Compared to traditional visual inspection, DIR reduces interobserver variability and provides more nuanced insights into dose-specific and spatial parameters of locoregional recurrences. Additionally, the study identifies the location of the initial recurrence as a key predictor of subsequent locoregional recurrence after salvage surgery and re-IMRT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abdallah S.R. Mohamed
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Geoffrey V. Martin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Sweet Ping Ng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Austin Health, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Vinita Takiar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Beth M. Beadle
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Mark Zafereo
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Adam S. Garden
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Steven J. Frank
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - C. David Fuller
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - G. Brandon Gunn
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - William H. Morrison
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - David I. Rosenthal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jay Reddy
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Amy Moreno
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Anna Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jack Phan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Bahig H, Nguyen-Tan PF, Yuan Y, Filion E, Ng SP, Soulières D, Christopoulos A, Fuller CD, Garden AS, Hutcheson KA, Lee A, Spiotto MT, Rosenthal DI, Phan J. Stereotactic Boost and Short-Course Radiotherapy for p16-Associated Oropharynx Cancer (SHORT-OPC): First Planned Interim Safety Analysis from a Randomized Phase II Trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2023; 117:e564-e565. [PMID: 37785728 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.06.1888] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/04/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S) There is a need for safe treatment de-intensification in p16+ oropharynx cancer (OPC). The standard of care (SOC) radiotherapy (RT) regimen is cumbersome and associated with high toxicity. Stereotactic radiotherapy (SBRT) and multimodality image guidance is an opportunity to precisely target the gross tumor while safely reducing elective irradiation dose. We aim to assess the safety and efficacy of a short course RT for p16+ OPC, consisting of an SBRT boost to the gross tumor volume (GTV) followed by de-escalated elective irradiation. MATERIALS/METHODS In this randomized phase II trial, patients with p16-positive, stage I-II OPSCC with primary tumor <30 cc (8th Ed AJCC) are planned with combined CT, MRI and FDG-PET, and randomized to 1) SBRT boost (14 Gy in 2 fractions) to the GTV followed with de-escalated RT (+/- Cisplatin) to a dose of 40 Gy in 20 fractions, or 2) SOC RT (+/- Cisplatin) to a dose of 70 Gy in 33 fractions to the GTV and 59.4-54Gy (or equivalent) to the intermediate-to-low dose elective region. Patients are stratified by stage (I vs. II) and use of chemotherapy. The primary endpoint of the trial is locoregional control at 2 years, powered for a sample size of 100 patients. A Bayesian adaptive design includes 2 planned safety interim analysis using grade ≥ 3 subacute toxicities >40% as a stopping criterion, and 1 planned futility analysis. Acute adverse events (AE) are defined as those occurring ≤ 60 days from RT, subacute AE between 60-180 days after RT, and late AE >180 days from RT. This is the first planned toxicity analysis. RESULTS Twenty-one patients were randomly assigned and eligible (11 in SOC and 10 in experimental arm). Median age was 69 years (range 49-84); 29% and 71% had stage T1 and T2, while 10%, 85% and 1 patient had N0, N1 and N2 disease, respectively. RT alone and chemoradiation was administered in 67% and 33% of patients, respectively. At a median follow-up of 11 months (range 1.7-17.6), there was 1 local recurrence at the primary tumor site in the SOC arm (at 10 month) and no recurrence in the experimental arm. All enrolled patients remain alive at the time of analysis. There was a 54.5% rate of grade 3 acute AE in the SOC arm and 30.0% rate of grade 3 acute AE in the experimental arm. More specifically, 1, 5 (45%), 2 (18%), and 2 (18%) versus 0, 1, 1 and 1 patient developed acute grade 3 dysphagia, mucositis, pain and dermatitis in the SOC and experimental arm, respectively. There was no acute grade 4 or 5 toxicity. There was no grade ≥ 3 subacute toxicity or late toxicity in both arms. CONCLUSION This primary safety analysis showed that SBRT boost followed by a short course of de-escalated elective irradiation in p16+ OPC has limited early toxicity and meets criteria for study continuation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H Bahig
- Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - P F Nguyen-Tan
- Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Y Yuan
- MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - E Filion
- Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - S P Ng
- Olivia Newton-John Cancer Wellness & Research Centre, Austin Health, Department of Radiation Oncology, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - D Soulières
- Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - A Christopoulos
- Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM), Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - C D Fuller
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - A S Garden
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - K A Hutcheson
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - A Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - M T Spiotto
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - D I Rosenthal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - J Phan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Maroongroge S, Nguyen CIHM, Moreno AC, Rosenthal DI, Mayo LL, Garden AS, Gunn GB, Phan J, Lee A, Fuller CD, Morrison WH, Spiotto MT, Court LE, Netherton T. Clinical Acceptability of Automatically Generated Elective Lymph Node Volumes for Head and Neck Cancer Patients. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2023; 117:e694-e695. [PMID: 37786038 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.06.2173] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/04/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S) Manual contouring of head and neck lymph node levels is a time-intensive process prone to provider-specific variation. The purpose of this work is to generate a clinical segmentation tool while minimizing the amount of manual effort required by physicians to develop training datasets and review contours. Here we investigate an approach to curate, develop, and clinically validate an auto-contouring model for standard cervical lymph node volumes in the head and neck using a publicly available deep learning architecture. This model updates our previously validated tool to reflect modern practices in lymph node segmentation. MATERIALS/METHODS With the assistance of a resident physician, five radiation oncologists manually contoured individual lymph node levels on CT scans for three separate patients treated definitively with radiation or chemoradiation for oropharynx cancer, resulting in 15 unique ground truth cases. These cases were then used to train an nnUnet deep-learning model to generate automated contours for 32 additional cases. These 32 cases were reviewed, manually edited, and used to create the final model. Finally, the model was used to generate contours on the original 15 CT scans (testing cohort), and providers compared these automated contours with the ground-truth (manual) contours. Two blinded studies were performed. In a double-blinded fashion, providers were first asked to select which set of contours they would prefer to use in clinical practice as a starting point for actual cases. Second, they scored each contour on a Likert scale (1-5) to indicate clinical acceptability, ranging from completely unusable to usable without modification. RESULTS Across all lymph node levels (IA, IB, II, III, IV, V, RP), average Dice Similarity Coefficient ranged from 0.77 to 0.89 for AI vs manual contours in the testing cohort. These AI and manual lymph node contours were reviewed by 5 physicians each, resulting in 525 preference scores. Across all lymph nodes, the AI contour was superior to or equally preferred to the manual contours at rates ranging from 75% to 91% in the first blinded study. In the second blinded study, physician preference for the manual vs AI contour was statistically different for only the RP contours (p < 0.01). Thus, there was not a significant difference in clinical acceptability for nodal levels I-V for manual versus AI contours. Across all physician-generated contours, 82% were rated as usable with stylistic to no edits, and across all AI-generated contours, 92% were rated as usable with stylistic to no edits. CONCLUSION An approach to generate clinically acceptable automated contours for cervical lymph node levels in the head and neck was demonstrated. Furthermore, for nodal levels I-V, there was no significant difference in clinical acceptability in manual vs AI contours. Because we were able to generate and validate a model for each lymph node level individually, the output is applicable to a complete range of disease in which cervical lymph nodes are treated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Maroongroge
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - C I H M Nguyen
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - A C Moreno
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - D I Rosenthal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - L L Mayo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - A S Garden
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - G B Gunn
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - J Phan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - A Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - C D Fuller
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - W H Morrison
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - M T Spiotto
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - L E Court
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - T Netherton
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Goodman CD, Garden AS, Wang H, Wang XA, Diao K, Lee A, Reddy J, Moreno AC, Spiotto MT, Fuller CD, Rosenthal DI, Ferrarotto R, Raza SM, Su SY, Hanna EY, DeMonte F, Phan J. Fractionated Stereotactic Radiotherapy in the Management of Dural Recurrence of Olfactory Neuroblastoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2023; 117:e585-e586. [PMID: 37785774 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.06.1929] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/04/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S) Treatment protocols for dural recurrence among esthesioneuroblastoma patients have not been standardized. We assess the outcomes of fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (FSR) for patients with olfactory neuroblastoma (ONB) dura-based recurrences. MATERIALS/METHODS We identified ONB patients with dura-based recurrences treated with FSR after prior radiotherapy who were enrolled between 2013 and 2022 in our prospective head and neck reirradiation and skull base registries. In-field tumor control (within 2 cm of prescribed radiotherapy volume) and out-of-field tumor control (non-contiguous or contralateral dura, nodal, or distant metastases) were analyzed. RESULTS Thirteen patients with 28 dural lesions were included in this analysis. All patients were initially treated with surgery to their primary paranasal sinus disease; 69% with a craniofacial approach followed by adjuvant radiotherapy to a median dose of 63 Gy (range 60-72.4 Gy) prescribed to the resected tumor bed. Patients re-presented with dural recurrence at median 58.3 months (range 35.0 - 163.0 months) from completion of their initial treatment. Two patients underwent dural resections. On presentation of recurrence, 4 patients had 1 lesion treated, with a median of 2 lesions treated (range 1-4 lesions). All dural based tumors were treated with FSR to a median dose of 27 Gy in 3 fractions delivered QOD. 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT was utilized for FSR treatment planning in 31% of cases. The median follow up from FSR was 23.3 months (range: 13.1 - 51.6 months). The 1-year overall survival and progression free survival was 75% and 38%, respectively. The 1- and 2-year in-field control rate was 85% and 75%, respectively. Among treated lesions, 25 of 28 (89%) responded or remained stable following FSR. Two patients (3 lesions) had evidence of in-field radiographic progression at 17 and 9 months, respectively. Five patients (38%) experienced progression in the contralateral or non-contiguous dura, and 5 patients (38%) developed distant metastases. The overall out-of-field progression rate was 58% at 1 year. There was no grade 3 or higher toxicity observed. Three patients (23%) developed asymptomatic changes on MRI consistent with brain necrosis, all of which occurred in a previously irradiated region. CONCLUSION In the largest single institution study of FSR reirradiation for ONB dural recurrence to date, high local control rates with minimal toxicity are attainable. However, subsequent out-of-field dural recurrences and/or distant metastases remain problematic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C D Goodman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - A S Garden
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - H Wang
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - X A Wang
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - K Diao
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - A Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - J Reddy
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - A C Moreno
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - M T Spiotto
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - C D Fuller
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - D I Rosenthal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - R Ferrarotto
- Department of Thoracic Head and Neck Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - S M Raza
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - S Y Su
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - E Y Hanna
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - F DeMonte
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - J Phan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Koutroumpakis E, Mohamed ASR, Chaftari P, Rosenthal DI, Gujral D, Nutting C, Kim P, Bassett R, Fuller CD, Mouhayar E. Longitudinal Changes in the Carotid Arteries of Head and Neck Cancer Patients Following Radiation Therapy: Results from a Prospective Serial Imaging Biomarker Characterization Study. medRxiv 2023:2023.09.18.23295583. [PMID: 37790305 PMCID: PMC10543048 DOI: 10.1101/2023.09.18.23295583] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/05/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION We prospectively evaluated morphologic and functional changes in the carotid arteries of patients treated with unilateral neck radiation therapy (RT) for head and neck cancer. METHODS Bilateral carotid artery duplex studies were performed at 0, 3, 6, 12, 18 months and 2, 3, 4, and 5 years following RT. Intima media thickness (IMT); global and regional circumferential, as well as radial strain, arterial elasticity, stiffness, and distensibility were calculated. RESULTS Thirty-eight patients were included. A significant difference in the IMT from baseline between irradiated and unirradiated carotid arteries was detected at 18 months (median, 0.073mm vs -0.003mm; P =0.014), which increased at 3 and 4 years (0.128mm vs 0.013mm, P =0.016, and 0.177mm vs 0.023mm, P =0.0002, respectively). A > 0.073mm increase at 18 months was significantly more common in patients who received concurrent chemotherapy (67% vs 25%; P =0.03). A significant transient change was noted in global circumferential strain between the irradiated and unirradiated arteries at 6 months (median difference, -0.89, P =0.023), which did not persist. No significant differences were detected in the other measures of elasticity, stiffness, and distensibility. CONCLUSIONS Functional and morphologic changes of the carotid arteries detected by carotid ultrasound, such as changes in global circumferential strain at 6 months and carotid IMT at 18 months, may be useful for the early detection of radiation-induced carotid artery injury, can guide future research aiming to mitigate carotid artery stenosis, and should be considered for clinical surveillance survivorship recommendations after head and neck RT.
Collapse
|
12
|
Ferrarotto R, Nagarajan P, Maronge JM, Johnson JM, Rosenthal DI, Myers JN, Gross ND. Outcomes of Treatment With Neoadjuvant Cemiplimab for Patients With Advanced, Resectable Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck: Secondary Analysis of a Phase 2 Clinical Trial. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2023; 149:847-849. [PMID: 37535378 PMCID: PMC10401391 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoto.2023.1729] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2023] [Accepted: 06/11/2023] [Indexed: 08/04/2023]
Abstract
This secondary analysis of a phase 2 clinical trial examines long-term survival for resectable cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck according to pathologic response.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Renata Ferrarotto
- Department of Thoracic/Head and Neck Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | | | - Jacob M. Maronge
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Jason M. Johnson
- Department of Neuroradiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - David I. Rosenthal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Jeffrey N. Myers
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
- The University of Texas Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Houston
| | - Neil D. Gross
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Salama V, Youssef S, Xu T, Wahid KA, Chen J, Rigert J, Lee A, Hutcheson KA, Gunn B, Phan J, Garden AS, Frank SJ, Morrison W, Reddy JP, Spiotto MT, Naser MA, Dede C, He R, Mohamed AS, van Dijk LV, Lin R, Roldan CJ, Rosenthal DI, Fuller CD, Moreno AC. Temporal characterization of acute pain and toxicity kinetics during radiation therapy for head and neck cancer. A retrospective study. Oral Oncol Rep 2023; 7:100092. [PMID: 38638130 PMCID: PMC11025722 DOI: 10.1016/j.oor.2023.100092] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/20/2024]
Abstract
Objectives Pain during Radiation Therapy (RT) for oral cavity/oropharyngeal cancer (OC/OPC) is a clinical challenge due to its multifactorial etiology and variable management. The objective of this study was to define complex pain profiles through temporal characterization of pain descriptors, physiologic state, and RT-induced toxicities for pain trajectories understanding. Materials and methods Using an electronic health record registry, 351 OC/OPC patients treated with RT from 2013 to 2021 were included. Weekly numeric scale pain scores, pain descriptors, vital signs, physician-reported toxicities, and analgesics were analyzed using linear mixed effect models and Spearman's correlation. Area under the pain curve (AUCpain) was calculated to measure pain burden over time. Results Median pain scores increased from 0 during the weekly visit (WSV)-1 to 5 during WSV-7. By WSV-7, 60% and 74% of patients reported mouth and throat pain, respectively, with a median pain score of 5. Soreness and burning pain peaked during WSV-6/7 (51%). Median AUCpain was 16% (IQR (9.3-23)), and AUCpain significantly varied based on gender, tumor site, surgery, drug use history, and pre-RT pain. A temporal increase in mucositis and dermatitis, declining mean bodyweight (-7.1%; P < 0.001) and mean arterial pressure (MAP) 6.8 mmHg; P < 0.001 were detected. Pulse rate was positively associated while weight and MAP were negatively associated with pain over time (P < 0.001). Conclusion This study provides insight on in-depth characterization and associations between dynamic pain, physiologic, and toxicity kinetics. Our findings support further needs of optimized pain control through temporal data-driven clinical decision support systems for acute pain management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vivian Salama
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Sara Youssef
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Tianlin Xu
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Kareem A. Wahid
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jaime Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jillian Rigert
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Anna Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Katherine A. Hutcheson
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Brandon Gunn
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jack Phan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Adam S. Garden
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Steven J. Frank
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - William Morrison
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jay P. Reddy
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Michael T. Spiotto
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Mohamed A. Naser
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Cem Dede
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Renjie He
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Abdallah S.R. Mohamed
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Lisanne V. van Dijk
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, NL, USA
| | - Ruitao Lin
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Carlos J. Roldan
- Department of Pain Medicine, Division of Anesthesiology, Critical Care Medicine, and Pain Medicine, The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - David I. Rosenthal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Clifton D. Fuller
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Amy C. Moreno
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Rooney MK, Andring LM, Corrigan KL, Bernard V, Williamson TD, Fuller CD, Garden AS, Gunn B, Lee A, Moreno AC, Morrison WH, Phan J, Rosenthal DI, Spiotto M, Frank SJ. Hypothyroidism following Radiotherapy for Head and Neck Cancer: A Systematic Review of the Literature and Opportunities to Improve the Therapeutic Ratio. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:4321. [PMID: 37686597 PMCID: PMC10486996 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15174321] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2023] [Revised: 08/23/2023] [Accepted: 08/25/2023] [Indexed: 09/10/2023] Open
Abstract
(1) Background: Radiotherapy (RT) is a central component for the treatment of many head and neck cancers. In this systematic review of the literature, we aimed to characterize and quantify the published evidence on RT-related hypothyroidism, including estimated incidence, clinical risk factors, and dosimetric parameters that may be used to guide clinical decision making. Furthermore, we aimed to identify potential areas of improvement in the prevention and clinical management of RT-induced hypothyroidism, including the role of modern advanced therapeutic techniques. (2) Methods: We conducted a systemic review of the literature in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. PubMed and Google Scholar were searched to identify original research articles describing the incidence, mechanism, dosimetry, treatment, or prevention of radiation-related hypothyroidism for adults receiving RT for the treatment of head and neck cancers. The snowball method was used to identify additional articles. For identified articles, we tabulated several datapoints, including publication date, patient sample size, estimated hypothyroidism incidence, cancer site/type, follow-up period, radiation modality and technique, use of multimodality therapy, method of thyroid function evaluation, and proposed dosimetric predictors of hypothyroidism. (3) Results: One hundred and eleven articles met inclusion criteria, reflecting a range of head and neck cancer subtypes. There was a large variation in the estimated incidence of RT-related hypothyroidism, with a median estimate of 36% (range 3% to 79%). Reported incidence increased in later publication dates, which was likely related to improved screening and longer follow up. There were a wide variety of predictive metrics used to identify patients at high risk of hypothyroidism, the most common of which were volumetric and mean dosimetrics related to the thyroid gland (Vxx%, Dmean). More recently, there has been increasing evidence to suggest that the thyroid gland volume itself and the volume of the thyroid gland spared from high-dose radiation (VSxx) may better predict thyroid function after RT. There were no identified studies investigating the role of advanced radiotherapeutic techniques such as MRI-guided RT or particle therapy to decrease RT-related hypothyroidism. Conclusions: Hypothyroidism is a common toxicity resulting from therapeutic radiation for head and neck cancer with recent estimates suggesting 40-50% of patients may experience hypothyroidism after treatment. Dosimetric predictive models are increasingly able to accurately identify patients at risk of hypothyroidism, especially those utilizing thyroid VS metrics. Further investigation regarding the potential for advanced radiotherapeutic therapies to decrease RT-induced thyroid dysfunction is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael K. Rooney
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA (V.B.); (T.D.W.); (S.J.F.)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Roldan CJ, Rosenthal DI, Koyyalagunta D, Feng L, Warner K. Methylene Blue for the Treatment of Radiation-Induced Oral Mucositis during Head and Neck Cancer Treatment: An Uncontrolled Cohort. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:3994. [PMID: 37568810 PMCID: PMC10417523 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15153994] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2023] [Revised: 07/22/2023] [Accepted: 08/04/2023] [Indexed: 08/13/2023] Open
Abstract
Pain from radiation-therapy-induced oral mucositis during head-neck cancer treatment is aggravated by concurrent chemotherapy and commonly fails traditional treatments. To explore safe and sustainable alternatives, we investigated methylene blue oral rinse to reduce radiation-therapy-related oral mucositis pain. For this, we conducted a retrospective observational cohort study in a tertiary-care academic care cancer center including 85 patients with refractory oral mucositis pain during radiation therapy for head-neck cancer. Changes in pain (scale 0-10), oral function burden (scale 0-6) and requirement for percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube placement were measured. Among 58 patients, 60% received radiation therapy alone and 40% received concurrent chemotherapy-radiation therapy. Methylene blue oral rinse (MBOR) significantly decreased oral mucositis pain for at least 6.2 h (median + SD 8 ± 1.68 before vs. 2 ± 2.20 after; p < 0.0001) and oral function burden (3.5 ± 1.33 before vs. 0 ± 0.86 after; p < 0.0001). Eleven patients (19%) had percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tubes placed before using methylene blue oral rinse; subsequently, four (36%) resumed oral alimentation after methylene blue oral rinse. Two patients (3%) required percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tubes despite methylene blue oral rinse. Minimal adverse events were reported (n = 9, 15%). Our study showed that methylene blue oral rinse was an effective and safe topical treatment for opioid-refractory oral pain from oral mucositis associated with radiation therapy for head-neck cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carlos J. Roldan
- Department of Pain Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Texas Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
- McGovern Medical School, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (UTHealth), Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - David I. Rosenthal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77054, USA
| | - Dhanalakshmi Koyyalagunta
- Department of Pain Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Texas Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Lei Feng
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77054, USA
| | - Keith Warner
- Department of Pain Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Texas Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Caudell JJ, Torres-Saavedra PA, Rosenthal DI, Axelrod RS, Nguyen-Tan PF, Sherman EJ, Weber RS, Galvin JM, El-Naggar AK, Konski AA, Echevarria MI, Dunlap NE, Shenouda G, Singh AK, Beitler JJ, Garsa A, Bonner JA, Garden AS, Algan O, Harris J, Le QT. Long-Term Update of NRG/RTOG 0522: A Randomized Phase 3 Trial of Concurrent Radiation and Cisplatin With or Without Cetuximab in Locoregionally Advanced Head and Neck Cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2023; 116:533-543. [PMID: 36549347 PMCID: PMC10247515 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2022.12.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2022] [Revised: 11/23/2022] [Accepted: 12/08/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The combination of cisplatin and radiation or cetuximab and radiation improves overall survival of patients with locoregionally advanced head and neck carcinoma. NRG Oncology conducted a phase 3 trial to test the hypothesis that adding cetuximab to radiation and cisplatin would improve progression-free survival (PFS). METHODS AND MATERIALS Eligible patients with American Joint Committee on Cancer sixth edition stage T2 N2a-3 M0 or T3-4 N0-3 M0 were accrued from November 2005 to March 2009 and randomized to receive radiation and cisplatin without (arm A) or with (arm B) cetuximab. Outcomes were correlated with patient and tumor features. Late reactions were scored using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (version 3). RESULTS Of 891 analyzed patients, 452 with a median follow-up of 10.1 years were alive at analysis. The addition of cetuximab did not improve PFS (hazard ratio [HR], 1.06; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.89-1.26; P = .74), with 10-year estimates of 43.6% (95% CI, 38.8- 48.4) for arm A and 40.2% (95% CI, 35.4-45.0) for arm B. Cetuximab did not reduce locoregional failure (HR, 1.21; 95% CI, 0.95-1.53; P = .94) or distant metastasis (HR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.54-1.14; P = .10) or improve overall survival (HR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.80-1.16; P = .36). Cetuximab did not appear to improve PFS in either p16-positive oropharynx (HR, 1.30; 95% CI, 0.87-1.93) or p16-negative oropharynx or nonoropharyngeal primary (HR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.73-1.21). Grade 3 to 4 late toxicity rates were 57.4% in arm A and 61.3% in arm B (P = .26). CONCLUSIONS With a median follow-up of more than 10 years, this updated report confirms the addition of cetuximab to radiation therapy and cisplatin did not improve any measured outcome in the entire cohort or when stratifying by p16 status.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jimmy J Caudell
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL.
| | - Pedro A Torres-Saavedra
- NRG Oncology Statistics and Data Management Center, American College of Radiology, Philadelphia, PA
| | - David I Rosenthal
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, Head and Neck Surger, and Pathology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Rita S Axelrod
- Department of Medical Oncology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Phuc Felix Nguyen-Tan
- Department of Radiology, Radiation Oncology and Nuclear Medicine, CHUM - Centre Hospitalier de l'Universite de Montreal, Montreal, Canada
| | - Eric J Sherman
- Head and Neck Oncology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, NY
| | - Randal S Weber
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, Head and Neck Surger, and Pathology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - James M Galvin
- Imaging and Radiation Oncology Core (IROC) Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Adel K El-Naggar
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, Head and Neck Surger, and Pathology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Andre A Konski
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Chester County Hospital/University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | | | - Neal E Dunlap
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Louisville, James Graham Brown Cancer Center, Louisville, KY
| | - George Shenouda
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre (MUHC), Montreal, Canada
| | - Anurag K Singh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY
| | | | - Adam Garsa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, USC Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center LAPS, Los Angeles, CA
| | - James A Bonner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Alabama at Birmingham Cancer Center, Birmingham, AL
| | - Adam S Garden
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, Head and Neck Surger, and Pathology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Ozer Algan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK
| | - Jonathan Harris
- NRG Oncology Statistics and Data Management Center, American College of Radiology, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Quynh-Thu Le
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford Cancer Institute, Palo Alto, CA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Bahig H, Ehab HY, Garden AS, Ng SP, Frank SJ, Nguyen T, Gunn GB, Rosenthal DI, Fuller CD, Ferrarotto R, Bell D, Su S, Phan J. Long-term outcomes of modern multidisciplinary management of sinonasal cancers: The M. D. Anderson experience. Head Neck 2023. [PMID: 37165701 DOI: 10.1002/hed.27381] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2022] [Revised: 04/09/2023] [Accepted: 04/12/2023] [Indexed: 05/12/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To report long-term outcomes of modern radiotherapy for sinonasal cancers. METHODS AND MATERIALS A retrospective analysis of patients with sinonasal tumors treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy or proton therapy. Multivariate analysis was used to determine predictive variables of progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS Three hundred and eleven patients were included, with median follow-up of 75 months. The most common histologies were squamous cell (42%), adenoid cystic (15%), and sinonasal undifferentiated carcinoma (15%). Induction chemotherapy was administered to 47% of patients; 68% had adjuvant radiotherapy. Ten-year local control, regional control, distant metastasis free survival, PFS, and overall survival rates were 73%, 88%, 47%, 32%, and 51%, respectively. Age, non-nasal cavity tumor site, T3-4 stage, neck dissection, and radiation dose were predictive of PFS, while age, non-nasal cavity tumor site, T3-4 stage, positive margins, neck dissection, and use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy were predictive of OS. There was a 13% rate of late grade ≥3 toxicities. CONCLUSION This cohort of patients with sinonasal cancer treated with modern radiotherapy demonstrates favorable disease control rate and acceptable toxicity profile.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Houda Bahig
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montréal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Hanna Y Ehab
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Adam S Garden
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Sweet Ping Ng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Olivia Newton-John Cancer Centre, Austin Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Steven J Frank
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Theresa Nguyen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Gary B Gunn
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - David I Rosenthal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Clifton D Fuller
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Renata Ferrarotto
- Department of Thoracic/Head and Neck Medical Oncology, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Diana Bell
- Department of Pathology, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Shirley Su
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Jack Phan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
El-Habashy DM, Wahid KA, He R, McDonald B, Rigert J, Mulder SJ, Lim TY, Wang X, Yang J, Ding Y, Naser MA, Ng SP, Bahig H, Salzillo TC, Preston KE, Abobakr M, Shehata MA, Elkhouly EA, Alagizy HA, Hegazy AH, Mohammadseid M, Terhaard C, Philippens M, Rosenthal DI, Wang J, Lai SY, Dresner A, Christodouleas JC, Mohamed ASR, Fuller CD. Longitudinal diffusion and volumetric kinetics of head and neck cancer magnetic resonance on a 1.5T MR-Linear accelerator hybrid system: A prospective R-IDEAL Stage 2a imaging biomarker characterization/ pre-qualification study. medRxiv 2023:2023.05.04.23289527. [PMID: 37205359 PMCID: PMC10187456 DOI: 10.1101/2023.05.04.23289527] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/21/2023]
Abstract
Objectives We aim to characterize the serial quantitative apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) changes of the target disease volume using diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) acquired weekly during radiation therapy (RT) on a 1.5T MR-Linac and correlate these changes with tumor response and oncologic outcomes for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) patients as part of a programmatic R-IDEAL biomarker characterization effort. Methods Thirty patients with pathologically confirmed HNSCC who received curative-intent RT at the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, were included in this prospective study. Baseline and weekly Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (weeks 1-6) were obtained, and various ADC parameters (mean, 5 th , 10 th , 20 th , 30 th , 40 th , 50 th , 60 th , 70 th , 80 th , 90 th and 95 th percentile) were extracted from the target regions of interest (ROIs). Baseline and weekly ADC parameters were correlated with response during RT, loco-regional control, and the development of recurrence using the Mann-Whitney U test. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to compare the weekly ADC versus baseline values. Weekly volumetric changes (Δvolume) for each ROI were correlated with ΔADC using Spearman's Rho test. Recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) was performed to identify the optimal ΔADC threshold associated with different oncologic outcomes. Results There was an overall significant rise in all ADC parameters during different time points of RT compared to baseline values for both gross primary disease volume (GTV-P) and gross nodal disease volumes (GTV-N). The increased ADC values for GTV-P were statistically significant only for primary tumors achieving complete remission (CR) during RT. RPA identified GTV-P ΔADC 5 th percentile >13% at the 3 rd week of RT as the most significant parameter associated with CR for primary tumor during RT (p <0.001). Baseline ADC parameters for GTV-P and GTV-N didn't significantly correlate with response to RT or other oncologic outcomes. There was a significant decrease in residual volume of both GTV-P & GTV-N throughout the course of RT. Additionally, a significant negative correlation between mean ΔADC and Δvolume for GTV-P at the 3 rd and 4 th week of RT was detected (r = -0.39, p = 0.044 & r = -0.45, p = 0.019, respectively). Conclusion Assessment of ADC kinetics at regular intervals throughout RT seems to be correlated with RT response. Further studies with larger cohorts and multi-institutional data are needed for validation of ΔADC as a model for prediction of response to RT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dina M El-Habashy
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
- Department of Clinical Oncology and Nuclear Medicine, Menoufia University, Shebin Elkom, Egypt
| | - Kareem A Wahid
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Renjie He
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Brigid McDonald
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Jillian Rigert
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Samuel J. Mulder
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Tze Yee Lim
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Xin Wang
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Jinzhong Yang
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Yao Ding
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Mohamed A Naser
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Sweet Ping Ng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Austin Health Melbourne, Australia
| | - Houda Bahig
- Department of radiology, radiation oncology and nuclear medicine, Université de Montréal, Canada
| | - Travis C Salzillo
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Kathryn E Preston
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
- University of Houston College of Pharmacy, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Moamen Abobakr
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Mohamed A Shehata
- Department of Clinical Oncology and Nuclear Medicine, Menoufia University, Shebin Elkom, Egypt
| | - Enas A Elkhouly
- Department of Clinical Oncology and Nuclear Medicine, Menoufia University, Shebin Elkom, Egypt
| | - Hagar A Alagizy
- Department of Clinical Oncology and Nuclear Medicine, Menoufia University, Shebin Elkom, Egypt
| | - Amira H Hegazy
- Department of Clinical Oncology and Nuclear Medicine, Menoufia University, Shebin Elkom, Egypt
| | - Mustefa Mohammadseid
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Chris Terhaard
- Department of Radiation Therapy, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Marielle Philippens
- Department of Radiation Therapy, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - David I. Rosenthal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Jihong Wang
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Stephen Y. Lai
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Division of Surgery,The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Alex Dresner
- Philips Healthcare MR Oncology, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | | | | | - Clifton D Fuller
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Contrera KJ, Tam S, Pytynia K, Diaz EM, Hessel AC, Goepfert RP, Lango M, Su SY, Myers JN, Weber RS, Eguia A, Pisters PWT, Adair DK, Nair AS, Rosenthal DI, Mayo L, Chronowski GM, Zafereo ME, Shah SJ. Impact of Cancer Care Regionalization on Patient Volume. Ann Surg Oncol 2023; 30:2331-2338. [PMID: 36581726 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-022-13029-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2022] [Accepted: 12/12/2022] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cancer centers are regionalizing care to expand patient access, but the effects on patient volume are unknown. This study aimed to compare patient volumes before and after the establishment of head and neck regional care centers (HNRCCs). METHODS This study analyzed 35,394 unique new patient visits at MD Anderson Cancer Center (MDACC) before and after the creation of HNRCCs. Univariate regression estimated the rate of increase in new patient appointments. Geospatial analysis evaluated patient origin and distribution. RESULTS The mean new patients per year in 2006-2011 versus 2012-2017 was 2735 ± 156 patients versus 3155 ± 207 patients, including 464 ± 78 patients at HNRCCs, reflecting a 38.4 % increase in overall patient volumes. The rate of increase in new patient appointments did not differ significantly before and after HNRCCs (121.9 vs 95.8 patients/year; P = 0.519). The patients from counties near HNRCCs, showed a 210.8 % increase in appointments overall, 33.8 % of which were at an HNRCC. At the main campus exclusively, the shift in regional patients to HNRCCs coincided with a lower rate of increase in patients from the MDACC service area (33.7 vs. 11.0 patients/year; P = 0.035), but the trend was toward a greater increase in out-of-state patients (25.7 vs. 40.3 patients/year; P = 0.299). CONCLUSIONS The creation of HNRCCs coincided with stable increases in new patient volume, and a sizeable minority of patients sought care at regional centers. Regional patients shifted to the HNRCCs, and out-of-state patient volume increased at the main campus, optimizing access for both local and out-of-state patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kevin J Contrera
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Samantha Tam
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Kristen Pytynia
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Eduardo M Diaz
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Amy C Hessel
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Ryan P Goepfert
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Miriam Lango
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Shirley Y Su
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jeffrey N Myers
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Randal S Weber
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Arturo Eguia
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, McGovern Medical School, University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | | | - Deborah K Adair
- Department of Global Business Development, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Ajith S Nair
- Department of Global Business Development, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - David I Rosenthal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Lauren Mayo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Gregory M Chronowski
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Mark E Zafereo
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
| | - Shalin J Shah
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Contrera KJ, Tam S, Pytynia K, Diaz EM, Hessel AC, Goepfert RP, Lango M, Su SY, Myers JN, Weber RS, Eguia A, Pisters PWT, Adair DK, Nair AS, Rosenthal DI, Mayo L, Chronowski GM, Zafereo ME, Shah SJ. ASO Visual Abstract: Impact of Cancer Care Regionalization on Patient Volume. Ann Surg Oncol 2023; 30:2341-2342. [PMID: 36720835 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-023-13104-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/23/2022] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Kevin J Contrera
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Samantha Tam
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Kristen Pytynia
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Eduardo M Diaz
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Amy C Hessel
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Ryan P Goepfert
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Miriam Lango
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Shirley Y Su
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jeffrey N Myers
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Randal S Weber
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Arturo Eguia
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, McGovern Medical School, University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Peter W T Pisters
- Office of the President, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Deborah K Adair
- Department of Global Business Development, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Ajith S Nair
- Department of Global Business Development, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - David I Rosenthal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Lauren Mayo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Gregory M Chronowski
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Mark E Zafereo
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
| | - Shalin J Shah
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Gillison ML, Ferris RL, Harris J, Colevas AD, Mell LK, Kong C, Jordan RC, Moore KL, Truong MT, Kirsch C, Chakravarti A, Blakaj DM, Clump DA, Ohr JP, Deeken JF, Gensheimer MF, Saba NF, Dorth JA, Rosenthal DI, Leidner RS, Kimple RJ, Machtay M, Curran WJ, Torres-Saavedra P, Le QT. Safety of Nivolumab Added to Chemoradiation Therapy Platforms for Intermediate and High-Risk Locoregionally Advanced Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: RTOG Foundation 3504. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2023; 115:847-860. [PMID: 36228746 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2022.10.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2022] [Revised: 09/10/2022] [Accepted: 10/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Programmed death-1 immune checkpoint blockade improves survival of patients with recurrent/metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), but the benefits of addition to (chemo)radiation for newly diagnosed patients with HNSCC remain unknown. METHODS AND MATERIALS We evaluated the safety of nivolumab concomitant with 70 Gy intensity modulated radiation therapy and weekly cisplatin (arm 1), every 3-week cisplatin (arm 2), cetuximab (arm 3), or alone for platinum-ineligible patients (arm 4) in newly diagnosed intermediate- or high-risk locoregionally advanced HNSCC. Patients received nivolumab from 2 weeks prior to radiation therapy until 3 months post-radiation therapy. The primary endpoint was dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). If ≤2 of the first 8 evaluable patients experienced a DLT, an arm was considered safe. Secondary endpoints included toxicity and feasibility of adjuvant nivolumab to 1 year, defined as all 7 additional doses received by ≥4 of the first 8 evaluable patients across arms. RESULTS Of 39 patients (10 in arms 1, 3, 4 and 9 in arm 2), 72% had T3-4 tumors, 85% had N2-3 nodal disease, and 67% had >10 pack-years of smoking. There were no DLTs in arms 1 and 2, 1 in arm 3 (mucositis), and 2 in arm 4 (lipase elevation and mucositis in 1 and fatigue in another). The most common grade ≥3 nivolumab-related adverse events were lipase increase, mucositis, diarrhea, lymphopenia, hyponatremia, leukopenia, fatigue, and serum amylase increase. Adjuvant nivolumab was feasible as defined in the protocol. CONCLUSIONS Concomitant nivolumab with the 4 tested regimens was safe for patients with intermediate- and high-risk HNSCC, and subsequent adjuvant nivolumab was feasible as defined (NCT02764593).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Jonathan Harris
- RTOG Foundation Statistics and Data Management Center, American College of Radiology, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | | | - Loren K Mell
- UC San Diego Moores Cancer Center, La Jolla, California
| | - Christina Kong
- Stanford Cancer Institute, Palo Alto, Stanford, California
| | | | - Kevin L Moore
- UC San Diego Moores Cancer Center, La Jolla, California
| | | | | | | | | | - David A Clump
- UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - James P Ohr
- UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | | | | | - Nabil F Saba
- Emory University Hospital/Winship Cancer Institute, Atlanta, Georgia
| | | | | | - Rom S Leidner
- Providence Portland Medical Center, Portland, Oregon
| | - Randall J Kimple
- University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center, Madison, Wisconsin
| | - Mitchell Machtay
- Penn State Milton S Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, Pennsylvania
| | | | - Pedro Torres-Saavedra
- RTOG Foundation Statistics and Data Management Center, American College of Radiology, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Quynh Thu Le
- Stanford Cancer Institute, Palo Alto, Stanford, California.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Ng SP, Cardenas CE, Bahig H, Elgohari B, Wang J, Johnson JM, Moreno AC, Shah SJ, Garden AS, Phan J, Gunn GB, Frank SJ, Ding Y, Na L, Yuan Y, Urbauer D, Mohamed ASR, Rosenthal DI, Morrison WH, MacManus MP, Fuller CD. Changes in Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) in Serial Weekly MRI during Radiotherapy in Patients with Head and Neck Cancer: Results from the PREDICT-HN Study. Curr Oncol 2022; 29:6303-6313. [PMID: 36135064 PMCID: PMC9498049 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol29090495] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2022] [Revised: 08/24/2022] [Accepted: 08/29/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: The PREDICT-HN study aimed to systematically assess the kinetics of imaging MR biomarkers during head and neck radiotherapy. Methods: Patients with intact squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck were enrolled. Pre-, during, and post-treatment MRI were obtained. Serial GTV and ADC measurements were recorded. The correlation between each feature and the GTV was calculated using Spearman’s correlation coefficient. The linear mixed model was used to evaluate the change in GTV over time. Results: A total of 41 patients completed the study. The majority (76%) had oropharyngeal cancer. A total of 36 patients had intact primary tumours that can be assessed on MRI, and 31 patients had nodal disease with 46 nodes assessed. Median primary GTV (GTVp) size was 14.1cc. The rate of GTVp shrinkage was highest between pre-treatment and week 4. Patients with T3-T4 tumours had a 3.8-fold decrease in GTVp compared to T1-T2 tumours. The ADC values correlated with residual GTVp. The median nodal volume (GTVn) was 12.4cc. No clinical features were found to correlate with GTVn reduction. The overall change in ADC for GTVn from pre-treatment was significant for 35th−95th percentiles in weeks 1−4 (p < 0.001). Conclusion: A discrepancy in the trajectory of ADC between primary and nodal sites suggested that they exhibit different treatment responses and should be analysed separately in future studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sweet Ping Ng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77098, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Olivia Newton-John Cancer and Wellness Centre, Austin Health, Melbourne, VIC 3071, Australia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia
- Correspondence:
| | - Carlos E. Cardenas
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77098, USA
| | - Houda Bahig
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC H2X 3E4, Canada
| | - Baher Elgohari
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77098, USA
- Department of Clinical Oncology and Nuclear Medicine, Mansoura University, Mansoura 35516, Egypt
| | - Jihong Wang
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77098, USA
| | - Jason M. Johnson
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77098, USA
| | - Amy C. Moreno
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77098, USA
| | - Shalin J. Shah
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77098, USA
| | - Adam S. Garden
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77098, USA
| | - Jack Phan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77098, USA
| | - G. Brandon Gunn
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77098, USA
| | - Steven J. Frank
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77098, USA
| | - Yao Ding
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77098, USA
| | - Lumine Na
- Department of Biostatistics, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia
| | - Ying Yuan
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77098, USA
| | - Diana Urbauer
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77098, USA
| | - Abdallah S. R. Mohamed
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77098, USA
| | - David I. Rosenthal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77098, USA
| | - William H. Morrison
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77098, USA
| | - Michael P. MacManus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia
| | - Clifton D. Fuller
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77098, USA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Prinsloo S, Rosenthal DI, Garcia MK, Meng Z, Cohen L. Cross-Cultural Brain Activity Differences Between True and Sham Acupuncture for Xerostomia During Head and Neck Cancer Radiotherapy. Integr Cancer Ther 2022; 21:15347354221101630. [PMID: 35603438 PMCID: PMC9125604 DOI: 10.1177/15347354221101630] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: A prior phase III, multicenter (United States and China), clinical trial
found true acupuncture (TA) resulted in lower xerostomia scores 12 months
after radiotherapy than that of a standard care control group. This small
pilot study examined brain function changes comparing TA to sham acupuncture
(SA) in US and Fudan patients undergoing head and neck radiotherapy. Methods: To determine cerebral activity during TA versus SA acupuncture, patients
underwent electroencephalogram evaluation (EEG) immediately prior, during
and after both conditions. Acupuncture occurred during weeks 3 to 5 of
radiotherapy, with patients receiving either TA or SA, followed 2 to 3 days
later by the other treatment in a counterbalanced manner. Results: In the TA minus SA condition (N = 14 Fudan; N = 13 US), most changes were in
the delta (0.5-3.5 Hz) and alpha (8-12 Hz) bandwidths. Delta was present in
the frontal gyrus and parahippocampal gyrus. Alpha was present in the
anterior and posterior cingulate, lingual gyrus, amygdala, precuneus, medial
frontal gyrus, fusiform gyrus, and superior frontal gyrus. Maximal cortical
differences in the Fudan cohort between TA and SA were in areas previously
shown to be associated with (TA). In the US cohort, maximal differences
between TA and SA were associated with areas which are usually decreased in
TA conditions. Conclusions: There were distinct differences in brain function between those receiving TA
and SA and there were clear differences between cultures, helping to explain
the lack of placebo effect in the Fudan participants and strong placebo
effect in the US patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Prinsloo
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | | | - Mary Kay Garcia
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Zhiqiang Meng
- Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China
| | - Lorenzo Cohen
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Michikawa C, Torres-Saavedra PA, Silver NL, Harari PM, Kies MS, Rosenthal DI, Le QT, Jordan RC, Duose DY, Mallampati S, Trivedi S, Luthra R, Wistuba II, Osman AA, Lichtarge O, Foote RL, Parvathaneni U, Hayes DN, Pickering CR, Myers JN. Evolutionary Action Score of TP53 Analysis in Pathologically High-Risk Human Papillomavirus-Negative Head and Neck Cancer From a Phase 2 Clinical Trial: NRG Oncology Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 0234. Adv Radiat Oncol 2022; 7:100989. [PMID: 36420184 PMCID: PMC9677209 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2022.100989] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2021] [Accepted: 05/04/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose An evolutionary action scoring algorithm (EAp53) based on phylogenetic sequence variations stratifies patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) bearing TP53 missense mutations as high-risk, associated with poor outcomes, or low-risk, with similar outcomes as TP53 wild-type, and has been validated as a reliable prognostic marker. We performed this study to further validate prior findings demonstrating that EAp53 is a prognostic marker for patients with locally advanced HNSCC and explored its predictive value for treatment outcomes to adjuvant bio-chemoradiotherapy. Methods and Materials Eighty-one resection samples from patients treated surgically for stage III or IV human papillomavirus-negative HNSCC with high-risk pathologic features, who received either radiation therapy + cetuximab + cisplatin (cisplatin) or radiation therapy + cetuximab + docetaxel (docetaxel) as adjuvant treatment in a phase 2 study were subjected to TP53 targeted sequencing and EAp53 scoring to correlate with clinical outcomes. Due to the limited sample size, patients were combined into 2 EAp53 groups: (1) wild-type or low-risk; and (2) high-risk or other. Results At a median follow-up of 9.8 years, there was a significant interaction between EAp53 group and treatment for overall survival (P = .008), disease-free survival (P = .05), and distant metastasis (DM; P = .004). In wild-type or low-risk group, the docetaxel arm showed significantly better overall survival (hazard ratio [HR] 0.11, [0.03-0.36]), disease-free survival (HR 0.24, [0.09-0.61]), and less DM (HR 0.04, [0.01-0.31]) than the cisplatin arm. In high-risk or other group, differences between treatments were not statistically significant. Conclusions The docetaxel arm was associated with better survival than the cisplatin arm for patients with wild-type or low-risk EAp53. These benefits appear to be largely driven by a reduction in DM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chieko Michikawa
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas,Department of Maxillofacial Surgery, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Pedro A. Torres-Saavedra
- NRG Oncology Statistics and Data Management Center, American College of Radiology, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Natalie L. Silver
- Cleveland Clinic, Head and Neck Institute/Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Paul M. Harari
- Department of Human Oncology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin
| | - Merrill S. Kies
- Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - David I. Rosenthal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Quynh-Thu Le
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, California
| | - Richard C. Jordan
- NRG Oncology Biospecimen Bank and University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | | | | | - Sanchit Trivedi
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Rajyalakshmi Luthra
- Department of Hematopathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | | | - Abdullah A. Osman
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Olivier Lichtarge
- Departments of Molecular and Human Genetics, Pharmacology, and Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| | - Robert L. Foote
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Upendra Parvathaneni
- Radiation Oncology Center, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, Washington
| | - D. Neil Hayes
- Division of Medical Oncology, The University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, Tennessee
| | - Curtis R. Pickering
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Jeffrey N. Myers
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas,Corresponding author: Jeffrey N. Myers, MD, PhD
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Kiong KL, Moreno A, Vu CN, Zheng G, Rosenthal DI, Weber RS, Lewis CM. Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) in head and neck oncologic surgery: Impact on return to intended oncologic therapy (RIOT) and survival. Oral Oncol 2022; 130:105906. [PMID: 35594776 DOI: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2022.105906] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2021] [Revised: 04/09/2022] [Accepted: 05/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) pathways in head and neck cancer (HNC) have shown to improve perioperative outcomes and reduce complications. The longer term implications on adjuvant treatment and survival have not been studied. We hereby report the first study on the impact of an ERAS pathway on return to intended oncologic treatment (RIOT) and overall survival (OS) in HNC. METHODS 200 patients undergoing head and neck oncologic surgery on an ERAS pathway between March 1, 2016 and March 31, 2019 were matched to controls over the same interval. Demographic, tumor and adjuvant therapy-related data were collected, including time to adjuvant therapy(TAT) and treatment package time(TPT). Risk factors for TAT > 42 days and TPT ≥ 85 days were assessed. OS was compared and risk factors for inferior OS determined. RESULTS Baseline characteristics including co-morbidities and tumor stage were similar. Of 179 patients planned for adjuvant treatment, there was no difference in RIOT rate (89.0% vs 87.5%, p = 0.753), proportion of TAT > 42 days of surgery (55.6% vs 59.7%, p = 0.642), or TPT ≥ 85 days (48.1% vs 57.1, p = 0.258), for the ERAS and control groups, respectively. On multivariate analysis, alcohol use (OR 3.58; 95 %CI 1.11-11.52) and recurrent disease status (OR 2.88; 95 %CI 1.40-5.93) were independently associated with prolonged TAT. Three-year OS was similar between the ERAS and control groups (73% vs 76%, p = 0.521). CONCLUSION ERAS has not shown to improve RIOT or OS in the current study. However, its benefit for perioperative outcomes is undeniable and further studies are required on longer term quality and survival outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kimberley L Kiong
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Amy Moreno
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Catherine N Vu
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Gang Zheng
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - David I Rosenthal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Randal S Weber
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Carol M Lewis
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Ferrarotto R, Amit M, Nagarajan P, Rubin ML, Yuan Y, Bell D, El-Naggar AK, Johnson JM, Morrison WH, Rosenthal DI, Glisson BS, Johnson FM, Lu C, Mott FE, Esmaeli B, Diaz EM, Gidley PW, Goepfert RP, Lewis CM, Weber RS, Wargo JA, Basu S, Duan F, Yadav SS, Sharma P, Allison JP, Myers JN, Gross ND. Correction: Pilot Phase II Trial of Neoadjuvant Immunotherapy in Locoregionally Advanced, Resectable Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck. Clin Cancer Res 2022; 28:1735. [PMID: 35419587 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-22-0468] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
|
27
|
Peterson SK, Basen-Engquist K, Demark-Wahnefried W, Prokhorov AV, Shinn EH, Martch SL, Beadle BM, Garden AS, Farcas E, Brandon Gunn G, Fuller CD, Morrison WH, Rosenthal DI, Phan J, Eng C, Cinciripini PM, Karam-Hage MA, Camero Garcia M, Patrick K. Feasibility of Mobile and Sensor Technology for Remote Monitoring in Cancer Care and Prevention. AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2022; 2021:979-988. [PMID: 35308916 PMCID: PMC8861680] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
Objectives. Remote monitoring (RM) of health-related outcomes may optimize cancer care and prevention outside of clinic settings. CYCORE is a software-based system for collection and analyses of sensor and mobile data. We evaluated CYCORE's feasibility in studies assessing: (1) physical functioning in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients; (2) swallowing exercise adherence in head and neck cancer (HNC) patients during radiation therapy; and (3) tobacco use in cancer survivors post-tobacco treatment (TTP). Methods. Participants completed RM: for CRC, blood pressure, activity, GPS; for HNC, video of swallowing exercises; for TTP, expired carbon monoxide. Patient-reported outcomes were assessed daily. Results. For CRC, HNC and TTP, respectively, 50, 37, and 50 participants achieved 96%, 84%, 96% completion rates. Also, 91-100% rated ease and self-efficacy as highly favorable, 72-100% gave equivalent ratings for overall satisfaction, 72-93% had low/no data privacy concerns. Conclusion. RM was highly feasible and acceptable for patients across diverse use cases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susan K Peterson
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | | | | | | | - Eileen H Shinn
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | | | - Beth M Beadle
- Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Adam S Garden
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Emilia Farcas
- University of California-San Diego, The Qualcomm Institute/Calit2, San Diego, California, USA
| | - G Brandon Gunn
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Clifton D Fuller
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | | | - David I Rosenthal
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Jack Phan
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Cathy Eng
- Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | | | | | | | - Kevin Patrick
- University of California-San Diego, The Qualcomm Institute/Calit2, San Diego, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Cardenas CE, Blinde SE, Mohamed ASR, Ng SP, Raaijmakers C, Philippens M, Kotte A, Al-Mamgani AA, Karam I, Thomson DJ, Robbins J, Newbold K, Fuller CD, Terhaard C, On Behalf Of The, Bahig H, Blanchard P, Dehnad H, Doornaert P, Elhalawani H, Frank SJ, Garden A, Gunn GB, Hamming-Vrieze O, Kamal M, Kasperts N, Lee LW, McDonald BA, McPartlin A, Meheissen MA, Morrison WH, Navran A, Nutting CM, Pameijer F, Phan J, Poon I, Rosenthal DI, Smid EJ, Sykes AJ. Comprehensive Quantitative Evaluation of Variability in MR-guided Delineation of Oropharyngeal Gross Tumor Volumes and High-risk Clinical Target Volumes: An R-IDEAL Stage 0 Prospective Study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2022; 113:426-436. [PMID: 35124134 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2022.01.050] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2021] [Revised: 01/12/2022] [Accepted: 01/26/2022] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Tumor and target volume manual delineation remains a challenging task in head-and-neck cancer radiotherapy. The purpose of this study was to conduct a multi-institutional evaluation of manual delineations of gross tumor volume (GTV), high-risk clinical target volume (CTV), parotids, and submandibular glands on treatment simulation MR scans of oropharyngeal cancer (OPC) patients. METHODS Pre-treatment T1-weighted (T1w), T1-weighted with gadolinium contrast (T1w+C) and T2-weighted (T2w) MRI scans were retrospectively collected for 4 OPC patients under an IRB-approved protocol. The scans were provided to twenty-six radiation oncologists from seven international cancer centers who participated in this delineation study. In addition, patients' clinical history and physical examination findings, along with a medical photographic image and radiological results, were provided. The contours were compared using overlap/distance metrics using both STAPLE and pair-wise comparisons. Lastly, participants completed a brief questionnaire to assess participants' experience and CTV delineation institutional practices. RESULTS Large variability was measured between observers' delineations for GTVs and CTVs. The mean Dice Similarity Coefficient values across all physicians' delineations for GTVp, GTVn, CTVp, and CTVn were 0.77, 0.67, 0.77, and 0.69, respectively, for STAPLE comparison and 0.67, 0.60, 0.67, and 0.58, respectively, for pair-wise analysis. Normal tissue contours were defined more consistently when considering overlap/distance metrics. The median radiation oncology clinical experience was 7 years. The median experience delineating on MRI was 3.5 years. The GTV-to-CTV margin used was 10 mm for six of seven participant institutions. One institution used 8 mm and three participants (from three different institutions) used a margin of 5 mm. CONCLUSION The data from this study suggests that appropriate guidelines, contouring quality assurance sessions, and training are still needed for the adoption of MR-based treatment planning for head-and-neck cancers. Such efforts should play a critical role in reducing delineation variation and ensure standardization of target design across clinical practices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carlos E Cardenas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
| | - Sanne E Blinde
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum Kassel, Kassel, Germany
| | - Abdallah S R Mohamed
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Sweet Ping Ng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA; Department of Radiation Oncology, Olivia Newton-John Cancer Centre, Austin Health, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Cornelis Raaijmakers
- Department of Radiotherapy, Division of Imaging & Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Marielle Philippens
- Department of Radiotherapy, Division of Imaging & Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Alexis Kotte
- Department of Radiotherapy, Division of Imaging & Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Abrahim A Al-Mamgani
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Irene Karam
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Science Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - David J Thomson
- Department of Clinical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Jared Robbins
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USA
| | - Kate Newbold
- Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust and Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Clifton D Fuller
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
| | - Chris Terhaard
- Department of Radiotherapy, Division of Imaging & Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| | - On Behalf Of The
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Houda Bahig
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Pierre Blanchard
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Homan Dehnad
- Department of Radiotherapy, Division of Imaging & Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Patricia Doornaert
- Department of Radiotherapy, Division of Imaging & Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Hesham Elhalawani
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Steven J Frank
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Adam Garden
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - G Brandon Gunn
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Olga Hamming-Vrieze
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Mona Kamal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Nicolien Kasperts
- Department of Radiotherapy, Division of Imaging & Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Lip Wai Lee
- Department of Clinical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Brigid A McDonald
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Andrew McPartlin
- Department of Clinical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Mohamed Am Meheissen
- Alexandria Clinical Oncology Department, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt
| | - William H Morrison
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Arash Navran
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Frank Pameijer
- Department of Radiology, Division of Imaging & Oncology, University Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Jack Phan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Ian Poon
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Science Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - David I Rosenthal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Ernst J Smid
- Department of Radiotherapy, Division of Imaging & Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Andrew J Sykes
- Department of Clinical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Stieb S, Engeseth GM, Mohamed ASR, He R, Perez-Martinez I, Rock S, Deshpande TS, Garden AS, Rosenthal DI, Frank SJ, Gunn GB, Fuller CD. The influence of radiation dose on taste impairment in a prospective observational study cohort of oropharyngeal cancer patients. Acta Oncol 2022; 61:146-152. [PMID: 35060430 PMCID: PMC8981169 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2021.2022204] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND To analyze the influence of radiation dose on late radiation-associated taste impairment in oropharyngeal cancer (OPC) patients treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) using the taste bud bearing tongue mucosa as organ at risk. MATERIAL AND METHODS This study is part of an ongoing, prospective observational study. Cancer-free OPC survivors with at least 24 months from IMRT were included in this analysis. Scores for taste impairment and dry mouth were extracted from the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory Head and Neck module (MDASI-HN) with scores of ≥5 considered as moderate-to-severe symptoms. The mean dose, minimum and maximum dose to the taste bud bearing tongue mucosa, the ipsi- and contralateral parotid and submandibular glands were extracted and analyzed for correlation with moderate-to-severe taste impairment. RESULTS One hundred sixteen T1-4 OPC patients were included (81% males, median age: 55). The primary tumor was in the tonsil in 92 cases (79%) and in the base of tongue in 21 cases (18%). Patients were treated with 64.2-72.0 Gy; 37 patients (32%) received concurrent chemotherapy and 22 (19%) concurrent targeted therapy. After a median of 58 months from RT (IQR: 43-68) 38 patients (33%) suffered from moderate-to-severe long-term radiation-associated taste impairment. No dose volume parameter of the taste bud bearing tongue mucosa and the salivary glands was significantly associated with moderate-to-severe taste impairment for the whole patient cohort. For patients without concurrent chemotherapy, the minimum and mean dose to the ipsilateral parotid gland, and the maximum dose to the submandibular gland was significantly associated with late taste impairment (all p < 0.05). A significant correlation was found between taste impairment and dry mouth (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION The dose to the ipsilateral parotid gland seems to play an important role in the development of late taste impairment. The influence of dose to the taste bud bearing tongue mucosa remains unclear and needs further investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sonja Stieb
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.,Center for Radiation Oncology KSA-KSB, Cantonal Hospital Aarau, Aarau, Switzerland
| | - Grete M Engeseth
- Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.,Department of Clinical Science, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - Abdallah S R Mohamed
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Renjie He
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Ismael Perez-Martinez
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Stockton Rock
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Tanaya S Deshpande
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Adam S Garden
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - David I Rosenthal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Steven J Frank
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - G Brandon Gunn
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - C David Fuller
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
van Dijk LV, Frank SJ, Yuan Y, Gunn B, Moreno AC, Mohamed AS, Preston KE, Qing Y, Spiotto MT, Morrison WH, Lee A, Phan J, Garden AS, Rosenthal DI, Langendijk JA, Fuller CD. Proton Image-guided Radiation Assignment for Therapeutic Escalation via Selection of locally advanced head and neck cancer patients [PIRATES]: A Phase I safety and feasibility trial of MRI-guided adaptive particle radiotherapy. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2022; 32:35-40. [PMID: 34841093 PMCID: PMC8606299 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2021.11.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2021] [Accepted: 11/06/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Radiation dose-escalation for head and neck cancer (HNC) patients aiming to improve cure rates is challenging due to the increased risk of unacceptable treatment-induced toxicities. With "Proton Image-guided Radiation Assignment for Therapeutic Escalation via Selection of locally advanced head and neck cancer patients" (PIRATES), we present a novel treatment approach that is designed to facilitate dose-escalation while minimizing the risk of dose-limiting toxicities for locally advanced HPV-negative HNC patients. The aim of this Phase I trial is to assess the safety & feasibility of PIRATES approach. METHODS The PIRATES protocol employs a multi-faceted dose-escalation approach to minimize the risk of dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs): 1) sparing surrounding normal tissue from extraneous dose with intensity-modulated proton therapy, 2) mid-treatment hybrid hyper-fractionation for radiobiologic normal tissue sparing; 3) Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) guided mid-treatment boost volume adaptation, and 4) iso-effective restricted organ-at-risk dosing to mucosa and bone tissues.The time-to-event Bayesian optimal interval (TITE-BOIN) design is employed to address the challenge of the long DLT window of 6 months and find the maximum tolerated dose. The primary endpoint is unacceptable radiation-induced toxicities (Grade 4, mucositis, dermatitis, or Grade 3 myelopathy, osteoradionecrosis) occurring within 6 months following radiotherapy. The second endpoint is any grade 3 toxicity occurring in 3-6 months after radiation. DISCUSSION The PIRATES dose-escalation approach is designed to provide a safe avenue to intensify local treatment for HNC patients for whom therapy with conventional radiation dose levels is likely to fail. PIRATES aims to minimize the radiation damage to the tissue surrounding the tumor volume with the combination of proton therapy and adaptive radiotherapy and within the high dose tumor volume with hybrid hyper-fractionation and not boosting mucosal and bone tissues. Ultimately, if successful, PIRATES has the potential to safety increase local control rates in HNC patients with high loco-regional failure risk.Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT04870840; Registration date: May 4, 2021.Netherlands Trial Register ID: NL9603; Registration date: July 15, 2021.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisanne V. van Dijk
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Steven J. Frank
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Ying Yuan
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Brandon Gunn
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Amy C. Moreno
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Abdallah S.R. Mohamed
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Kathryn E. Preston
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Yun Qing
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Michael T. Spiotto
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - William H. Morrison
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Anna Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jack Phan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Adam S. Garden
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - David I. Rosenthal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Johannes A. Langendijk
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Clifton D. Fuller
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Zheng M, Ruzgar NM, Angoff NR, Rosenthal DI. Tips for Building a Community for Incoming Medical Students Virtually in the COVID-19 Era. Med Sci Educ 2021; 31:2033-2040. [PMID: 34754599 PMCID: PMC8567972 DOI: 10.1007/s40670-021-01447-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/15/2021] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
A sense of community benefits medical trainees by preserving mental well-being, nurturing collegiality and mentorship, and grounding ties with partnering organizations and services. Within medical school, building these support relationships often begins shortly after matriculation. In the current pandemic and the accompanying shift to a virtual class format, we believe that a dedicated effort to foster this sense of community is crucial for students who otherwise may feel untethered to their new learning environment. Here, we detail tips for building a medical school community virtually in the COVID-19 era between peers, within the school institution, and within the surrounding environment. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40670-021-01447-z.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melanie Zheng
- Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT USA
| | | | - Nancy R. Angoff
- Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT USA
- Yale School of Medicine, Section on General Internal Medicine, New Haven, CT USA
| | - David I. Rosenthal
- Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT USA
- Yale School of Medicine, Section on General Internal Medicine, New Haven, CT USA
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Bigelow EO, Harris J, Fakhry C, Gillison ML, Nguyen-Tân PF, Rosenthal DI, Frank SJ, Nair SG, Bahig H, Ridge JA, Caudell J, Donaldson C, Clifford BT, Shenouda G, Birrer MJ, Chen Y, Le QT. Risk stratification after recurrence of human papillomavirus (HPV)-related and non-HPV-related oropharyngeal cancer: A secondary analysis of NRG Oncology RTOG 0129 and 0522. Head Neck 2021; 44:158-167. [PMID: 34729846 DOI: 10.1002/hed.26915] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2021] [Revised: 09/12/2021] [Accepted: 10/15/2021] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND No risk-stratification strategies exist for patients with recurrent oropharyngeal cancer (OPC). METHODS Retrospective analysis using data from prospective NRG Oncology clinical trials RTOG 0129 and 0522. Eligibility criteria included known p16 status and smoking history, and locoregional/distant recurrence. Overall survival (OS) was measured from date of recurrence. Recursive partitioning analysis was performed to produce mutually exclusive risk groups. RESULTS Hundred and fifty-four patients were included with median follow-up after recurrence of 3.9 years (range 0.04-9.0). The most important factors influencing survival were p16 status and type of recurrence, followed by surgical salvage and smoking history (≤20 vs. >20 pack-years). Three significantly different risk groups were identified. Patients in the low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups had 2-year OS after recurrence of 81.1% (95%CI 68.5-93.7), 50.2% (95%CI 36.0-64.5), and 20.8% (95%CI 10.5-31.1), respectively. CONCLUSION Patient and tumor characteristics may be used to stratify patients into risk groups at the time of OPC recurrence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elaine O Bigelow
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Jonathan Harris
- NRG Oncology Statistics and Data Management Center, American College of Radiology, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Carole Fakhry
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Maura L Gillison
- The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Phuc Felix Nguyen-Tân
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Hospitalier de l'Universite de Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - David I Rosenthal
- The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Steven J Frank
- The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Suresh G Nair
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Lehigh Valley Hospital, Allentown, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Houda Bahig
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Hospitalier de l'Universite de Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - John A Ridge
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Jimmy Caudell
- H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | | | - Bradley T Clifford
- Department of Oncology, Summa Health System - Akron Campus, Akron, Ohio, USA
| | - George Shenouda
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre (MUHC), Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Michael J Birrer
- Department of Medical Oncology, University of Alabama at Birmingham Cancer Center, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
| | - Yuhchyau Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York, USA
| | - Quynh-Thu Le
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Diao K, Nguyen TP, Moreno AC, Reddy JP, Garden AS, Wang CH, Tung S, Wang C, Wang XA, Rosenthal DI, Fuller CD, Gunn GB, Frank SJ, Morrison WH, Shah SJ, Lee A, Spiotto MT, Su SY, Ferrarotto R, Phan J. Stereotactic body ablative radiotherapy for reirradiation of small volume head and neck cancers is associated with prolonged survival: Large, single-institution, modern cohort study. Head Neck 2021; 43:3331-3344. [PMID: 34269492 PMCID: PMC8511054 DOI: 10.1002/hed.26820] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2021] [Revised: 06/18/2021] [Accepted: 07/09/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Recurrent head and neck cancer has poor prognosis. Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) may improve outcomes by delivering ablative radiation doses. METHODS We reviewed patients who received definitive-intent SBRT reirradiation at our institution from 2013 to 2020. Patterns of failure, overall survival (OS), and toxicities were analyzed. RESULTS One hundred and thirty-seven patients were evaluated. The median OS was 44.3 months. The median SBRT dose was 45 Gy and median target volume 16.9 cc. The 1-year local, regional, and distant control was 78%, 66%, and 83%, respectively. Systemic therapy improved regional (p = 0.004) and distant control (p = 0.04) in nonmetastatic patients. Grade 3+ toxicities were more common at mucosal sites (p = 0.001) and with concurrent systemic therapy (p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS In a large cohort of SBRT reirradiation for recurrent, small volume head and neck cancers, a median OS of 44.3 months was observed. Systemic therapy improved regional and distant control. Toxicities were modulated by anatomic site and systemic therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kevin Diao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Theresa P. Nguyen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Amy C. Moreno
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Jay P. Reddy
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Adam S. Garden
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Catherine H. Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Samuel Tung
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Congjun Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Xin A. Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - David I. Rosenthal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Clifton D. Fuller
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Gary B. Gunn
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Steven J. Frank
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - William H. Morrison
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Shalin J. Shah
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Anna Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Michael T. Spiotto
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Shirley Y. Su
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Renata Ferrarotto
- Department of Thoracic Head and Neck Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Jack Phan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Sousa LG, Lazar Neto F, Torman DK, Diaz EM, Rosenthal DI, Glisson BS, Bell D, Ferrarotto R. Therapeutic approaches and outcomes in patients with larynx or hypopharynx high-grade neuroendocrine carcinoma: A single-center retrospective analysis. Head Neck 2021; 43:3788-3795. [PMID: 34524729 DOI: 10.1002/hed.26865] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2021] [Revised: 07/06/2021] [Accepted: 09/01/2021] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND High-grade neuroendocrine carcinoma of the larynx (HG-NECL) is rare and aggressive with limited data regarding response to systemic therapy. We evaluated clinicopathological features, therapeutic approaches, and outcomes in patients with laryngeal or hypopharyngeal HG-NECL. METHODS Data were retrospectively collected through 1997-2020. Median disease-free (mDFS), progression-free (mPFS), and overall survival (mOS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS Fifteen patients were identified; most had locoregional (N = 7) or metastatic disease (N = 5). The main curative-intent treatment was chemoradiation concurrent with platinum-based chemotherapy; the rate of complete response was 78%. Most patients (80%) developed recurrence; the mDFS was 13.1 months. For the first-line palliative therapy, the ORR and mPFS were 50% and 3.1 months, respectively. For all patients, the mOS was 17.8 months, and 8.6 months for metastatic disease. CONCLUSION Laryngeal HG-NEC is associated with high relapse rates and dismal prognosis for those with recurrent/metastatic disease. Novel therapeutic strategies are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luana Guimaraes Sousa
- Department of Thoracic and Head and Neck Medical Oncology, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Felippe Lazar Neto
- Department of Thoracic and Head and Neck Medical Oncology, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Danice Karagiannis Torman
- Department of Thoracic and Head and Neck Medical Oncology, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Eduardo M Diaz
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - David I Rosenthal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Bonnie S Glisson
- Department of Thoracic and Head and Neck Medical Oncology, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Diana Bell
- Department of Pathology, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Renata Ferrarotto
- Department of Thoracic and Head and Neck Medical Oncology, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Palasi S, Zhang N, Bankston M, Godby J, Burrows H, Lagunas J, Perkison W, Gunn B, Chambers MS, Rosenthal DI, Morrison W, Garden A, Fuller CD, Giordano S, Koay EJ. Factors associated with complex oral treatment device usage in patients with head and neck cancer. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2021; 30:78-83. [PMID: 34430717 PMCID: PMC8365308 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2021.08.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2021] [Revised: 08/02/2021] [Accepted: 08/03/2021] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
We studied complex oral treatment devices (COTDs) usage for head and neck cancer. SEER data (1992–2013) indicated use of COTDs increased from 36 to 67% of patients. COTD usage associated with age, gender, and geographic location of care. This is the first known study to use SEER data to analyze COTD usage.
Purpose The objective was to identify clinical and epidemiological factors associated with utilization of a complex oral treatment device (COTD), which may decrease toxicity in patients undergoing radiation therapy for head and neck cancer (HNC). Materials and Methods We retrospectively reviewed data from 1992 to 2013 in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare databases to analyze COTD usage during intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for patients diagnosed with cancer of the tongue, floor of mouth, nasopharynx, tonsil, or oropharynx. Patients with a radiation simulation and complex treatment device code within 4 weeks before the first IMRT claim were identified as meeting COTD usage criteria. Demographic, regional, tumor, and treatment data were analyzed. Results Out of 4511 patients who met eligibility criteria, 1932 patients (42.8%) did not utilize a COTD while 2579 (57.2%) met usage criteria. COTD utilization increased over time (36.36% usage in 1992 vs. 67.44% usage in 2013, p < .0001). Patients less likely to receive a COTD included those aged 86 years or older compared to those aged 66–70 (OR = 0.713, 95% CI: 0.528–0.962), male patients (OR = 0.817, 95% CI: 0.710–0.941), non-Hispanic Black patients compared to non-Hispanic White patients (OR = 0.750, 95% CI: 0.582–0.966), and Louisiana residents (OR = 0.367, 95% CI: 0.279–0.483). Cancer site, grade, stage, or function of IMRT had no significant association with COTD usage. Conclusions This study serves as the first known SEER-Medicare review of COTD utilization. Despite an increase in COTD usage over time, our results indicate age, gender, and geographic disparities are associated with utilization. Further research and development into methods that increase availability of COTDs may help increase utilization in specific patient populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephen Palasi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Division of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Ning Zhang
- Health Service Research Department, Division of Cancer Prevention and Population Science, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Mikaela Bankston
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Division of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Joy Godby
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Division of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Hannah Burrows
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Division of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Jennifer Lagunas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Division of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - William Perkison
- Department of Epidemiology, Human Genetics and Environmental Sciences, UTHealth School of Public Health, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Brandon Gunn
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Division of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Mark S Chambers
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Division of Surgery, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - David I Rosenthal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Division of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - William Morrison
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Division of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Adam Garden
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Division of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Clifton David Fuller
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Division of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Sharon Giordano
- Health Service Research Department, Division of Cancer Prevention and Population Science, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Eugene J Koay
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Division of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Ferrarotto R, Amit M, Nagarajan P, Rubin ML, Yuan Y, Bell D, El-Naggar AK, Johnson JM, Morrison WH, Rosenthal DI, Glisson BS, Johnson FM, Lu C, Mott FE, Esmaeli B, Diaz EM, Gidley PW, Goepfert RP, Lewis CM, Weber RS, Wargo JA, Basu S, Duan F, Yadav SS, Sharma P, Allison JP, Myers JN, Gross ND. Pilot Phase II Trial of Neoadjuvant Immunotherapy in Locoregionally Advanced, Resectable Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck. Clin Cancer Res 2021; 27:4557-4565. [PMID: 34187851 PMCID: PMC8711237 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-21-0585] [Citation(s) in RCA: 57] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2021] [Revised: 04/20/2021] [Accepted: 06/17/2021] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE In locoregionally advanced, resectable cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (CSCC-HN), surgery followed by radiotherapy is standard but can be cosmetically and functionally devastating, and many patients will have recurrence. PATIENTS AND METHODS Newly diagnosed or recurrent stage III-IVA CSCC-HN patients amenable to curative-intent surgery received two cycles of neoadjuvant PD-1 inhibition. The primary endpoint was ORR per RECIST 1.1. Secondary endpoints included pathologic response [pathologic complete response (pCR) or major pathologic response (MPR; ≤10% viable tumor)], safety, DSS, DFS, and OS. Exploratory endpoints included immune biomarkers of response. RESULTS Of 20 patients enrolled, 7 had recurrent disease. While only 6 patients [30%; 95% confidence interval (CI), 11.9-54.3] had partial responses by RECIST, 14 patients (70%; 95% CI, 45.7-88.1) had a pCR (n = 11) or MPR (n = 3). No SAEs ocurred during or after the neoadjuvant treatment. At a median follow-up of 22.6 months (95% CI, 21.7-26.1), one patient progressed and died, one died without disease, and two developed recurrence. The 12-month DSS, DFS, and OS rates were 95% (95% CI, 85.9-100), 89.5% (95% CI, 76.7-100), and 95% (95% CI, 85.9-100), respectively. Gene expression studies revealed an inflamed tumor microenvironment in patients with pCR or MPR, and CyTOF analyses demonstrated a memory CD8+ T-cell cluster enriched in patients with pCR. CONCLUSIONS Neoadjuvant immunotherapy in locoregionally advanced, resectable CSCC-HN is safe and induces a high pathologic response rate. Pathologic responses were associated with an inflamed tumor microenvironment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Renata Ferrarotto
- Department of Thoracic/Head and Neck Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Moran Amit
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | | | - M Laura Rubin
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Ying Yuan
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Diana Bell
- Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Adel K El-Naggar
- Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Jason M Johnson
- Department of Neuroradiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - William H Morrison
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - David I Rosenthal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Bonnie S Glisson
- Department of Thoracic/Head and Neck Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Faye M Johnson
- Department of Thoracic/Head and Neck Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
- The University of Texas Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Houston, Texas
| | - Charles Lu
- Department of Thoracic/Head and Neck Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Frank E Mott
- Department of Thoracic/Head and Neck Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Bita Esmaeli
- Department of Ophthalmic Plastic Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Eduardo M Diaz
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Paul W Gidley
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Ryan P Goepfert
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Carol M Lewis
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Randal S Weber
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Jennifer A Wargo
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Sreyashi Basu
- Department of Immunology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Fei Duan
- Department of Immunology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Shalini S Yadav
- Department of Immunology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Padmanee Sharma
- Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - James P Allison
- Department of Immunology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Jeffrey N Myers
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Neil D Gross
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Amit M, Liu C, Mansour J, Gleber-Netto FO, Tam S, Baruch EN, Aashiq M, El-Naggar AK, Moreno AC, Rosenthal DI, Glisson BS, Ferrarotto R, Wong MK, Tsai K, Flores ER, Migden MR, Silverman DA, Li G, Khanna A, Goepfert RP, Nagarajan P, Weber RS, Myers JN, Gross ND. Elective neck dissection versus observation in patients with head and neck cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma. Cancer 2021; 127:4413-4420. [PMID: 34358340 PMCID: PMC10187975 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.33773] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2021] [Revised: 04/18/2021] [Accepted: 04/26/2021] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The survival benefit of elective neck dissection (END) for patients with cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) of the head and neck and no evidence of regional metastasis (cN0) has never been reported. The aim of this study was to determine the effect of END on patient survival. METHODS The authors included patients with head and neck cSCC who had undergone primary surgery from 1995 to 2017. The primary end point was survival, and the secondary end points were the incidence of occult regional disease and regional disease control. To assess the impact of END on survival, the authors used multivariable Cox proportional hazards models with propensity score and matching techniques for internal validation. RESULTS A total of 1111 patients presented with no evidence of nodal disease; 173 had END, and 938 were observed. Adjuvant radiotherapy to the neck was administered to 101 patients (9%). END resulted in a 5-year overall survival rate of 52%, whereas the rate was 63% in the observation group (P = .003 [log-rank]). The 5-year disease-free survival rate for patients undergoing END was similar to that for the observation group (73% vs 75%; P = .429). A multivariate regression model showed that the performance of END was not associated with improved rates of overall, disease-specific, or disease-free survival; similarly, among patients with advanced disease (T3-4), those who underwent END did not have improved survival rates. CONCLUSIONS Among patients with cSCC of the head and neck, observation of the neck nodes resulted in noninferior survival rates in comparison with END at the time of primary surgery. Further studies are required to elucidate the role of END in patients with advanced disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Moran Amit
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Chuan Liu
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Jobran Mansour
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Frederico O Gleber-Netto
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Samantha Tam
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Henry Ford Health System and Henry Ford Cancer Institute, Detroit, Michigan
| | - Erez N Baruch
- Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Mohamed Aashiq
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Adel K El-Naggar
- Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Amy C Moreno
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - David I Rosenthal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Bonnie S Glisson
- Department of Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Renata Ferrarotto
- Department of Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Michael K Wong
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Kenneth Tsai
- Department of Pathology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida
| | - Elsa R Flores
- Department of Molecular Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida
| | - Michael R Migden
- Department of Dermatology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Deborah A Silverman
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.,Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Goujun Li
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Anshu Khanna
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Ryan P Goepfert
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | | | - Randal S Weber
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Jeffrey N Myers
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Neil D Gross
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Mercadante V, Jensen SB, Smith DK, Bohlke K, Bauman J, Brennan MT, Coppes RP, Jessen N, Malhotra NK, Murphy B, Rosenthal DI, Vissink A, Wu J, Saunders DP, Peterson DE. Salivary Gland Hypofunction and/or Xerostomia Induced by Nonsurgical Cancer Therapies: ISOO/MASCC/ASCO Guideline. J Clin Oncol 2021; 39:2825-2843. [PMID: 34283635 DOI: 10.1200/jco.21.01208] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To provide evidence-based recommendations for prevention and management of salivary gland hypofunction and xerostomia induced by nonsurgical cancer therapies. METHODS Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer/International Society of Oral Oncology (MASCC/ISOO) and ASCO convened a multidisciplinary Expert Panel to evaluate the evidence and formulate recommendations. PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library were searched for randomized controlled trials published between January 2009 and June 2020. The guideline also incorporated two previous systematic reviews conducted by MASCC/ISOO, which included studies published from 1990 through 2008. RESULTS A total of 58 publications were identified: 46 addressed preventive interventions and 12 addressed therapeutic interventions. A majority of the evidence focused on the setting of radiation therapy for head and neck cancer. For the prevention of salivary gland hypofunction and/or xerostomia in patients with head and neck cancer, there is high-quality evidence for tissue-sparing radiation modalities. Evidence is weaker or insufficient for other interventions. For the management of salivary gland hypofunction and/or xerostomia, intermediate-quality evidence supports the use of topical mucosal lubricants, saliva substitutes, and agents that stimulate the salivary reflex. RECOMMENDATIONS For patients who receive radiation therapy for head and neck cancer, tissue-sparing radiation modalities should be used when possible to reduce the risk of salivary gland hypofunction and xerostomia. Other risk-reducing interventions that may be offered during radiation therapy for head and neck cancer include bethanechol and acupuncture. For patients who develop salivary gland hypofunction and/or xerostomia, interventions include topical mucosal lubricants, saliva substitutes, and sugar-free lozenges or chewing gum. For patients with head and neck cancer, oral pilocarpine and oral cevimeline, acupuncture, or transcutaneous electrostimulation may be offered after radiation therapy.Additional information can be found at www.asco.org/supportive-care-guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Valeria Mercadante
- University College London and University College London Hospitals Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | | | | | - Kari Bohlke
- American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA
| | | | | | - Robert P Coppes
- University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Niels Jessen
- Danish Cancer Society Network for Patients with Head and Neck Cancer, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | | | | | | | - Arjan Vissink
- University of Groningen and University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Jonn Wu
- Vancouver Cancer Centre, British Columbia Cancer Agency, and University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Deborah P Saunders
- North East Cancer Centre, Northern Ontario School of Medicine, Sudbury, ON, Canada
| | - Douglas E Peterson
- School of Dental Medicine & Neag Comprehensive Cancer Center, UConn Health, Farmington, CT
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Kish JA, Zhang Q, Langer CJ, Nguyen-Tân PF, Rosenthal DI, Weber RS, List MA, Wong SJ, Garden AS, Hu K, Trotti AM, Bonner JA, Jones CU, Yom SS, Thorstad W, Schultz CJ, Ridge JA, Shenouda G, Harris J, Le QT. The impact of age on outcome in phase III NRG Oncology/RTOG trials of radiotherapy (XRT) +/- systemic therapy in locally advanced head and neck cancer. J Geriatr Oncol 2021; 12:937-944. [PMID: 33814339 PMCID: PMC8829803 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2021.03.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2020] [Revised: 02/08/2021] [Accepted: 03/17/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To examine the role age plays in the treatment and prognosis of locally advanced head and neck cancer (LAHNC) treated definitively with radiation alone or combined modality therapy. METHODS A retrospective analysis was performed of three NRG/RTOG trials examining either radiation alone or combined radiation and systemic therapy for LAHNC. The effect of age (≥70 yrs.) on cause-specific survival (CSS), overall survival (OS), and toxicity was evaluated. RESULTS A total of 2688 patients were analyzed, of whom 309 patients (11.5%) were ≥ 70. For all studies combined, the hazard ratio (HR) for CSS for patients age ≥ 70 vs. those <70 was 1.33 (95%CI: 1.14-1.55, p < 0.001). For OS, the HR for patients age ≥ 70 vs. those <70 for all studies combined was 1.55 (95% CI 1.35-1.77, p < 0.001). After adjustment for all covariates, age ≥ 70 was associated with worse OS regardless of adjustment for smoking and p16 status. The survival difference was more pronounced in those receiving combined radiation and systemic therapy. Hematologic and renal toxicities were increased in combined modality trials in patients ≥70 years old. CONCLUSIONS Patients age ≥ 70 with LAHNC were underrepresented in these clinical trials. Their CSS and OS proved inferior to patients <70 years old.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julie A Kish
- H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, United States of America.
| | - Qiang Zhang
- NRG Oncology Statistics and Data Management Center, United States of America
| | | | | | - David I Rosenthal
- University of Texas-MD Anderson Cancer Center, United States of America
| | - Randal S Weber
- University of Texas-MD Anderson Cancer Center, United States of America
| | - Marcy A List
- University of Chicago Comprehensive Cancer Center, United States of America
| | - Stuart J Wong
- Medical College of Wisconsin, United States of America
| | - Adam S Garden
- University of Texas-MD Anderson Cancer Center, United States of America
| | - Kenneth Hu
- New York University Langone, United States of America
| | - Andy M Trotti
- H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, United States of America
| | - James A Bonner
- University of Alabama at Birmingham, United States of America
| | | | - Sue S Yom
- University of California San Francisco, United States of America
| | | | | | - John A Ridge
- Fox Chase Cancer Center, United States of America
| | | | - Jonathan Harris
- NRG Oncology Statistics and Data Management Center, United States of America
| | | |
Collapse
|
40
|
Ng WT, Soong YL, Ahn YC, AlHussain H, Choi HCW, Corry J, Grégoire V, Harrington KJ, Hu CS, Jensen K, Kwong DL, Langendijk JA, Le QT, Lee NY, Lin JC, Lu TX, Mendenhall WM, O'Sullivan B, Ozyar E, Pan JJ, Peters LJ, Poh SS, Rosenthal DI, Sanguineti G, Tao Y, Wee JT, Yom SS, Chua MLK, Lee AWM. International Recommendations on Reirradiation by Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy for Locally Recurrent Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2021; 110:682-695. [PMID: 33571626 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2021.01.041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2020] [Revised: 01/11/2021] [Accepted: 01/23/2021] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Reirradiation for locally recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) is challenging because prior radiation dose delivered in the first course is often close to the tolerance limit of surrounding normal structures. A delicate balance between achieving local salvage and minimizing treatment toxicities is needed. However, high-level evidence is lacking because available reports are mostly retrospective studies on small series of patients. Pragmatic consensus guidelines, based on an extensive literature search and the pooling of opinions by leading specialists, will provide a useful reference to assist decision-making for these difficult decisions. METHODS AND MATERIALS A thorough review of available literature on recurrent NPC was conducted. A set of questions and preliminary draft guideline was circulated to a panel of international specialists with extensive experience in this field for voting on controversial areas and comments. A refined second proposal, based on a summary of the initial voting and different opinions expressed, was recirculated to the whole panel for review and reconsideration. The current guideline was based on majority voting after repeated iteration for final agreement. RESULTS The initial round of questions showed variations in clinical practice even among the specialists, reflecting the lack of high-quality supporting data and the difficulties in formulating clinical decisions. Through exchange of comments and iterative revisions, recommendations with high-to-moderate agreement were formulated on general treatment strategies and details of reirradiation (including patient selection, targets contouring, dose prescription, and constraints). CONCLUSION This paper provides useful reference on radical salvage treatment strategies for recurrent NPC and optimization of reirradiation through review of published evidence and consensus building. However, the final decision by the attending clinician must include full consideration of an individual patient's condition, understanding of the delicate balance between risk and benefits, and acceptance of risk of complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wai Tong Ng
- Department of Clinical Oncology, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Yoke Lim Soong
- Division of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore
| | - Yong Chan Ahn
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hussain AlHussain
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, King Fahad Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Horace C W Choi
- Department of Clinical Oncology, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - June Corry
- Radiation Oncology, GenesisCare, St. Vincent's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Vincent Grégoire
- Center for Molecular Imaging, Oncology, and Radiotherapy, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium, and Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France
| | - Kevin J Harrington
- Royal Marsden/Institute of Cancer Research National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre, London, United Kingdom
| | - Chao Su Hu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China
| | - Kenneth Jensen
- Danish Center for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Dora L Kwong
- Department of Clinical Oncology, University of Hong Kong and Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong
| | - Johannes A Langendijk
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Quynh Thu Le
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, NRG Oncology and HNCIG, Stanford, California
| | - Nancy Y Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, New York
| | - Jin Ching Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Tai Xiang Lu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Center of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - William M Mendenhall
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, Florida
| | - Brian O'Sullivan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - Enis Ozyar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Acibadem University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Jian Ji Pan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fujian Cancer Hospital and Fujian Medical University Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, China
| | - Lester J Peters
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Sharon S Poh
- Division of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore
| | - David I Rosenthal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Giuseppe Sanguineti
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Yungan Tao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Gustave Roussy, Paris-Saclay University, Villejuif, France
| | - Joseph T Wee
- Division of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore
| | - Sue S Yom
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Melvin L K Chua
- Division of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore
| | - Anne W M Lee
- Department of Clinical Oncology, University of Hong Kong Shenzhen Hospital and University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Hanania AN, Zhang X, Gunn GB, Rosenthal DI, Garden AS, Fuller CD, Phan J, Reddy JP, Moreno A, Chronowski G, Shah S, Ausat N, Hanna E, Ferrarotto R, Frank SJ. Proton Therapy for Major Salivary Gland Cancer: Clinical Outcomes. Int J Part Ther 2021; 8:261-272. [PMID: 34285952 PMCID: PMC8270094 DOI: 10.14338/ijpt-20-00044.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2020] [Accepted: 11/23/2020] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose To report clinical outcomes in terms of disease control and toxicity in patients with major salivary gland cancers (SGCs) treated with proton beam therapy. Materials and Methods Clinical and dosimetric characteristics of patients with SGCs treated from August 2011 to February 2020 on an observational, prospective, single-institution protocol were abstracted. Local control and overall survival were calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method. During radiation, weekly assessments of toxicity were obtained, and for patients with ≥ 90 days of follow-up, late toxicity was assessed. Results Seventy-two patients were identified. Median age was 54 years (range, 23-87 years). Sixty-three patients (88%) received postoperative therapy, and nine patients (12%) were treated definitively. Twenty-six patients (36%) received concurrent chemotherapy. Nine patients (12%) had received prior radiation. All (99%) but one patient received unilateral treatment with a median dose of 64 GyRBE (relative biological effectiveness) (interquartile range [IQR], 60-66), and 53 patients (74%) received intensity-modulated proton therapy with either single-field or multifield optimization. The median follow-up time was 30 months. Two-year local control and overall survival rates were 96% (95% confidence interval [CI] 85%-99%) and 89% (95% CI 76%-95%], respectively. Radiation dermatitis was the predominant grade-3 toxicity (seen in 21% [n = 15] of the patients), and grade ≥ 2 mucositis was rare (14%; n = 10 patients). No late-grade ≥ 3 toxicities were reported. Conclusion Proton beam therapy for treatment of major SGCs manifests in low rates of acute mucosal toxicity. In addition, the current data suggest a high rate of local control and minimal late toxicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander N Hanania
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.,Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Xiaodong Zhang
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - G Brandon Gunn
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - David I Rosenthal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Adam S Garden
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - C David Fuller
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jack Phan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jay P Reddy
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Amy Moreno
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Gregory Chronowski
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Shalin Shah
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Noveen Ausat
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Ehab Hanna
- Department of Head and Neck Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Renata Ferrarotto
- Department of Head and Neck Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Steven J Frank
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Bahig H, Gunn BG, Garden AS, Ye R, Hutcheson K, Rosenthal DI, Phan J, Fuller CD, Morrison WH, Reddy JP, Ng SP, Gross ND, Sturgis EM, Ferrarotto R, Gillison M, Frank SJ. Patient-Reported Outcomes after Intensity-Modulated Proton Therapy for Oropharynx Cancer. Int J Part Ther 2021; 8:213-222. [PMID: 34285948 PMCID: PMC8270092 DOI: 10.14338/ijpt-20-00081.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2020] [Accepted: 02/02/2021] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To report patient-reported outcomes (PROs) derived from the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Head and Neck (FACT-HN) tool, in patients with oropharynx cancer (OPC) treated with intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) in the context of first-course irradiation. MATERIALS AND METHODS Patients with locally advanced OPC treated with radical IMPT between 2011 and 2018 were included in a prospective registry. FACT-HN scores were measured serially during and 24 months following IMPT. PRO changes in the FACT-HN scores over time were assessed with mixed-model analysis. RESULTS Fifty-seven patients met inclusion criteria. Median age was 60 years (range, 41-84), and 91% had human papillomavirus-associated disease. In total, 28% received induction chemotherapy and 68% had concurrent chemotherapy. Compliance to FACT-HN questionnaire completion was 59%, 48%, and 42% at 6, 12, and 24 months after treatment, respectively. The mean FACT-General (G), FACT-Total, and FACT-Trial Outcome Index (TOI) score changes were statistically and clinically significant relative to baseline from week 3 of treatment up to week 2 after treatment. Nadir was reached at week 6 of treatment for all scores, with maximum scores dropping by 15%, 20%, and 39% compared to baseline for FACT-G, FACT-Total, and FACT-TOI, respectively. Subdomain scores of physical well-being, functional well-being, and head and neck additional concerns decreased from baseline during treatment and returned to baseline at week 4 after treatment. CONCLUSIONS IMPT was associated with a favorable PRO trajectory, characterized by an acute decline followed by rapid recovery to baseline. This study establishes the expected acute, subacute, and chronic trajectory of PROs for patients undergoing IMPT for OPC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Houda Bahig
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
,Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada
| | - Brandon G. Gunn
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Adam S. Garden
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Rong Ye
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Kate Hutcheson
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | | | - Jack Phan
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | | | | | - Jay Paul Reddy
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Sweet Ping Ng
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
,Peter MacCallum Cancer Center, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Neil D. Gross
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Erich M. Sturgis
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | | | - Maura Gillison
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Steven J. Frank
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Gunn GB, Garden AS, Ye R, Ausat N, Dahlstrom KR, Morrison WH, Fuller CD, Phan J, Reddy JP, Shah SJ, Mayo LL, Chun SG, Chronowski GM, Moreno AC, Myers JN, Hanna EY, Esmaeli B, Gillison ML, Ferrarotto R, Hutcheson KA, Chambers MS, Ginsberg LE, El-Naggar AK, Rosenthal DI, Zhu XR, Frank SJ. Proton Therapy for Head and Neck Cancer: A 12-Year, Single-Institution Experience. Int J Part Ther 2021; 8:108-118. [PMID: 34285940 PMCID: PMC8270083 DOI: 10.14338/ijpt-20-00065.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2020] [Accepted: 11/02/2020] [Indexed: 02/03/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To characterize our experience and the disease control and toxicity of proton therapy (PT) for patients with head and neck cancer (HNC). PATIENTS AND METHODS Clinical outcomes for patients with HNC treated with PT at our institution were prospectively collected in 2 institutional review board-approved prospective studies. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize patient characteristics and outcomes. Overall survival, local-regional control, and disease-free survival were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Treatment-related toxicities were recorded according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (version 4.03) scale. RESULTS The cohort consisted of 573 patients treated from February 2006 to June 2018. Median patient age was 61 years. Oropharynx (33.3%; n = 191), paranasal sinus (11%; n = 63), and periorbital tissues (11%; n = 62) were the most common primary sites. Patients with T3/T4 or recurrent disease comprised 46% (n = 262) of the cohort. The intent of PT was definitive in 53% (n = 303), postoperative in 37% (n = 211), and reirradiation in 10% (n = 59). Median dose was 66 Gy (radiobiological equivalent). Regarding systemic therapy, 43% had received concurrent (n = 244), 3% induction (n = 19), and 15% (n = 86) had both. At a median follow-up of 2.4 years, 88 patients (15%) had died and 127 (22%) developed disease recurrence. The overall survival, local-regional control, and disease-free survival at 2 and 5 years were, respectively, 87% and 75%, 87% and 78%, and 74% and 63%. Maximum toxicity (acute or late) was grade 3 in 293 patients (51%), grade 2 in 234 patients (41%), and grade 1 in 31 patients (5%). There were 381 acute grade 3 and 190 late grade 3 unique toxicities across 212 (37%) and 150 (26%) patients, respectively. There were 3 late-grade 4 events across 2 patients (0.3%), 2 (0.3%) acute-grade 5, and no (0%) late-grade 5 events. CONCLUSIONS The overall results from this prospective study of our initial decade of experience with PT for HNC show favorable disease control and toxicity outcomes in a multidisease-site cohort and provide a reference benchmark for future comparison and study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G. Brandon Gunn
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Adam S. Garden
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Rong Ye
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Noveen Ausat
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Kristina R. Dahlstrom
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - William H. Morrison
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - C. David Fuller
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jack Phan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jay P. Reddy
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Shalin J. Shah
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Lauren L. Mayo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Stephen G. Chun
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Gregory M. Chronowski
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Amy C. Moreno
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jeffery N. Myers
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Ehab Y. Hanna
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Bita Esmaeli
- Ophthalmic Plastic Surgery, Department of Plastic Surgery, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Maura L. Gillison
- Department of Medical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Renata Ferrarotto
- Department of Medical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Katherine A. Hutcheson
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Mark S. Chambers
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Lawrence E. Ginsberg
- Department of Neuroradiology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Adel K. El-Naggar
- Department of Pathology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - David I. Rosenthal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Xiaorong Ronald Zhu
- Department of Radiation Physics, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Steven J. Frank
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Sherry AD, Pasalic D, Gunn GB, Fuller CD, Phan J, Rosenthal DI, Morrison WH, Sturgis EM, Gross ND, Gillison ML, Ferrarotto R, El-Naggar AK, Garden AS, Frank SJ. Proton Beam Therapy for Head and Neck Carcinoma of Unknown Primary: Toxicity and Quality of Life. Int J Part Ther 2021; 8:234-247. [PMID: 34285950 PMCID: PMC8270080 DOI: 10.14338/ijpt-20-00034.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2020] [Accepted: 09/21/2020] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Proton radiation therapy (PRT) may offer dosimetric and clinical benefit in the treatment of head and neck carcinoma of unknown primary (HNCUP). We sought to describe toxicity and quality of life (QOL) in patients with HNCUP treated with PRT. Patients and Methods Toxicity and QOL were prospectively tracked in patients with HNCUP from 2011 to 2019 after institutional review board approval. Patients received PRT to the mucosa of the nasopharynx, oropharynx, and bilateral cervical lymph nodes with sparing of the larynx and hypopharynx. Patient-reported outcomes were tracked with the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory–Head and Neck Module, the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy–Head and Neck, the MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory, and the Xerostomia-Related QOL Scale. Primary study endpoints were the incidence of grade ≥ 3 (G3) toxicity and QOL patterns. Results Fourteen patients (median follow-up, 2 years) were evaluated. Most patients presented with human papillomavirus–positive disease (n = 12, 86%). Rates of G3 oral mucositis, xerostomia, and dermatitis were 7% (n = 1), 21% (n = 3), and 36% (n = 5), respectively. None required a gastrostomy. During PRT, QOL was reduced relative to baseline and recovered shortly after PRT. At 2 years after PRT, the local regional control, disease-free survival, and overall survival were 100% (among 7 patients at risk), 79% (among 6 patients at risk), and 90% (among 7 patients at risk), respectively. Conclusion Therefore, PRT for HNCUP was associated with highly favorable dosimetric and clinical outcomes, including minimal oral mucositis, xerostomia, and dysphagia. Toxicity and QOL may be superior with PRT compared with conventional radiation therapy and PRT maintains equivalent oncologic control. Further prospective studies are needed to evaluate late effects and cost-effectiveness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Dario Pasalic
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - G Brandon Gunn
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - C David Fuller
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jack Phan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - David I Rosenthal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - William H Morrison
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Erich M Sturgis
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Neil D Gross
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Maura L Gillison
- Department of Thoracic/Head and Neck Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Renata Ferrarotto
- Department of Thoracic/Head and Neck Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Adel K El-Naggar
- Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Adam S Garden
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Steven J Frank
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Smith GL, Fu S, Ning MS, Nguyen DK, Busse PM, Foote RL, Garden AS, Gunn GB, Fuller CD, Morrison WH, Chronowski GM, Shah SJ, Mayo LL, Phan J, Reddy JP, Snider JW, Patel SH, Katz SR, Lin A, Mohammed N, Dagan R, Lee NY, Rosenthal DI, Frank SJ. Work Outcomes after Intensity-Modulated Proton Therapy (IMPT) versus Intensity-Modulated Photon Therapy (IMRT) for Oropharyngeal Cancer. Int J Part Ther 2021; 8:319-327. [PMID: 34285958 PMCID: PMC8270077 DOI: 10.14338/ijpt-20-00067.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2020] [Accepted: 01/29/2021] [Indexed: 01/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose We compared work outcomes in patients with oropharyngeal cancer (OPC), randomized to intensity-modulated proton (IMPT) versus intensity-modulated photon therapy (IMRT) for chemoradiation therapy (CRT). Patients and Methods In 147 patients with stage II-IVB squamous cell OPC participating in patient-reported outcomes assessments, a prespecified secondary aim of a randomized phase II/III trial of IMPT (n = 69) versus IMRT (n = 78), we compared absenteeism, presenteeism (i.e., the extent to which an employee is not fully functional at work), and work productivity losses. We used the work productivity and activity impairment questionnaire at baseline (pre-CRT), at the end of CRT, and at 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years. A one-sided Cochran-Armitage test was used to analyze within-arm temporal trends, and a χ2 test was used to compare between-arm differences. Among working patients, at each follow-up point, a 1-sided Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used to compare work-productivity scores. Results Patient characteristics in IMPT versus IMRT arms were similar. In the IMPT arm, within-arm analysis demonstrated that an increasing proportion of patients resumed working after IMPT, from 60% (40 of 67) pre-CRT and 71% (30 of 42) at 1 year to 78% (18 of 23) at 2 years (P = 0.025). In the IMRT arm, the proportion remained stable, with 57% (43 of 76) pre-CRT, 54% (21 of 39) at 1 year, and 52% (13 of 25) working at 2 years (P = 0.47). By 2 years after CRT, the between-arm difference between patients who had IMPT and those who had IMRT trended toward significance (P = 0.06). Regardless of treatment arm, among working patients, the most severe work impairments occurred from treatment initiation to the end of CRT, with significant recovery from absenteeism, presenteeism, and productivity impairments by the 2-year follow-up (P < 0.001 for all). Higher magnitudes of recovery from absenteeism (at 1 year, P = 0.05; and at 2 years, P = 0.04) and composite work impairment scores (at 1 year, P = 0.04; and at 2 years, P = 0.04) were seen in patients treated with IMPT versus those treated with IMRT. Conclusion In patients with OPC receiving curative CRT, patients randomized to IMPT demonstrated increasing work and productivity recovery trends. Studies are needed to identify mechanisms underlying head and neck CRT treatment causing work disability and impairment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Grace L Smith
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.,Department of Health Services Research, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Shuangshuang Fu
- Department of Health Services Research, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Matthew S Ning
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Diem-Khanh Nguyen
- University of California Riverside School of Medicine, Riverside, CA, USA
| | - Paul M Busse
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Robert L Foote
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic and Mayo Clinic School of Medicine and Science, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Adam S Garden
- Willis-Knighton Proton Therapy Center, Shreveport, LA, USA
| | - Gary B Gunn
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Clifton D Fuller
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - William H Morrison
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Gregory M Chronowski
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Shalin J Shah
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Lauren L Mayo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jack Phan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jay P Reddy
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - James W Snider
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Samir H Patel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic and Mayo Clinic School of Medicine and Science, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Sanford R Katz
- Willis-Knighton Proton Therapy Center, Shreveport, LA, USA
| | - Alexander Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | | | - Roi Dagan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Nancy Y Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - David I Rosenthal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Steven J Frank
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Elhalawani H, Cardenas CE, Volpe S, Barua S, Stieb S, Rock CB, Lin T, Yang P, Wu H, Zaveri J, Elgohari B, Abdallah LE, Jethanandani A, Mohamed ASR, Court LE, Hutcheson KA, Brandon Gunn G, Rosenthal DI, Frank SJ, Garden AS, Rao A, Fuller CD. 18FDG positron emission tomography mining for metabolic imaging biomarkers of radiation-induced xerostomia in patients with oropharyngeal cancer. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2021; 29:93-101. [PMID: 34195391 PMCID: PMC8239739 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2021.05.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2021] [Revised: 05/11/2021] [Accepted: 05/30/2021] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Head and neck cancers radiotherapy (RT) is associated with inevitable injury to parotid glands and subsequent xerostomia. We investigated the utility of SUV derived from 18FDG-PET to develop metabolic imaging biomarkers (MIBs) of RT-related parotid injury. Methods Data for oropharyngeal cancer (OPC) patients treated with RT at our institution between 2005 and 2015 with available planning computed tomography (CT), dose grid, pre- & first post-RT 18FDG-PET-CT scans, and physician-reported xerostomia assessment at 3-6 months post-RT (Xero 3-6 ms) per CTCAE, was retrieved, following an IRB approval. A CT-CT deformable image co-registration followed by voxel-by-voxel resampling of pre & post-RT 18FDG activity and dose grid were performed. Ipsilateral (Ipsi) and contralateral (contra) parotid glands were sub-segmented based on the received dose in 5 Gy increments, i.e. 0-5 Gy, 5-10 Gy sub-volumes, etc. Median and dose-weighted SUV were extracted from whole parotid volumes and sub-volumes on pre- & post-RT PET scans, using in-house code that runs on MATLAB. Wilcoxon signed-rank and Kruskal-Wallis tests were used to test differences pre- and post-RT. Results 432 parotid glands, belonging to 108 OPC patients treated with RT, were sub-segmented & analyzed. Xero 3-6 ms was reported as: non-severe (78.7%) and severe (21.3%). SUV- median values were significantly reduced post-RT, irrespective of laterality (p = 0.02). A similar pattern was observed in parotid sub-volumes, especially ipsi parotid gland sub-volumes receiving doses 10-50 Gy (p < 0.05). Kruskal-Wallis test showed a significantly higher mean RT dose in the contra parotid in the patients with more severe Xero 3-6mo (p = 0.03). Multiple logistic regression showed a combined clinical-dosimetric-metabolic imaging model could predict the severity of Xero 3-6mo; AUC = 0.78 (95%CI: 0.66-0.85; p < 0.0001). Conclusion We sought to quantify pre- and post-RT 18FDG-PET metrics of parotid glands in patients with OPC. Temporal dynamics of PET-derived metrics can potentially serve as MIBs of RT-related xerostomia in concert with clinical and dosimetric variables.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hesham Elhalawani
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Carlos E Cardenas
- Department of Radiation Physics, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Stefania Volpe
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States.,Department of Oncology and Hemato-oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Souptik Barua
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Rice University, Houston, TX, United States.,Department of Computational Medicine and Bioinformatics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
| | - Sonja Stieb
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Calvin B Rock
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Utah Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, UT, United States
| | - Timothy Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Pei Yang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States.,Key Laboratory of Translational Radiation Oncology, Hunan Cancer Hospital, Xiangya Medical School, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Haijun Wu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Jhankruti Zaveri
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Section of Speech Pathology and Audiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Baher Elgohari
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States.,Department of Clinical Oncology & Nuclear Oncology, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt
| | - Lamiaa E Abdallah
- Department of Clinical Oncology & Nuclear Oncology, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Amit Jethanandani
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Abdallah S R Mohamed
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Laurence E Court
- Department of Radiation Physics, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Katherine A Hutcheson
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Section of Speech Pathology and Audiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - G Brandon Gunn
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - David I Rosenthal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Steven J Frank
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Adam S Garden
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Arvind Rao
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Rice University, Houston, TX, United States.,Department of Computational Medicine and Bioinformatics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.,Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.,Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
| | - Clifton D Fuller
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Grossberg AJ, Rock CD, Edwards J, Mohamed ASR, Ruzensky D, Currie A, Rosemond P, Phan J, Gunn GB, Frank SJ, Morrison WH, Garden AS, Fuller CD, Rosenthal DI. Bioelectrical impedance analysis as a quantitative measure of sarcopenia in head and neck cancer patients treated with radiotherapy. Radiother Oncol 2021; 159:21-27. [PMID: 33736997 PMCID: PMC8205950 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2021.03.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2020] [Revised: 03/04/2021] [Accepted: 03/05/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Sarcopenia is associated with decreased survival in head and neck cancer patients treated with radiotherapy. This study sought to determine whether in-clinic multifrequency bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) can identify survival-associated sarcopenia in patients with head and neck cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS This prospective observational study enrolled 50 patients with head and neck cancer undergoing radiation therapy. Baseline BIA measures of skeletal muscle (SM) mass, fat-free mass (FFM), and fat mass (FM) were compared to CT-based estimates using linear regression. Sex-specific BIA-derived thresholds for sarcopenia were defined by the maximum Youden Index on receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves. Patients were stratified by sarcopenia status and OS was compared using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test. RESULTS Among 48 evaluable patients, BIA measures of body composition were strongly correlated with CT measures: SM mass (r = 0.97; R2 = 0.94; p < 0.0001), FFM (r = 0.97; R2 = 0.94; p < 0.0001) and FM (r = 0.95; R2 = 0.90; p < 0.0001). SM mass index < 9.19 kg/m2 identified sarcopenia men with high sensitivity (91.7%) and specificity (92.9%), whereas in women SM mass index < 6.53 kg/m2 was sensitive for sarcopenia (100%), but not specific. Patients with sarcopenia, defined by either CT or BIA, exhibited decreased OS (HR = not estimable; CT p = 0.009; BIA p = 0.03). CONCLUSION BIA provides accurate estimates of body composition in head and neck cancer patients. Implementation of BIA in clinical practice may identify patients with sarcopenia at risk for poor survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aaron J Grossberg
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Brenden Colson Center for Pancreatic Care, Cancer Early Detection Advanced Research Center, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, USA.
| | - Crosby D Rock
- Paul L. Foster School of Medicine, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center El Paso, El Paso, USA
| | - Jared Edwards
- School of Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, USA
| | | | - Debra Ruzensky
- Department of Clinical Nutrition, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA
| | - Angela Currie
- Department of Clinical Nutrition, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA
| | - Patricia Rosemond
- Department of Clinical Nutrition, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA
| | - Jack Phan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA
| | - G Brandon Gunn
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA
| | - Steven J Frank
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA
| | - William H Morrison
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA
| | - Adam S Garden
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA
| | - Clifton D Fuller
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA
| | - David I Rosenthal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Talwalkar JS, Fortin AH, Morrison LJ, Kliger A, Rosenthal DI, Murtha T, Ellman MS. An Advanced Communication Skills Workshop Using Standardized Patients for Senior Medical Students. MedEdPORTAL 2021; 17:11163. [PMID: 34124349 PMCID: PMC8155077 DOI: 10.15766/mep_2374-8265.11163] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2021] [Accepted: 04/06/2021] [Indexed: 05/30/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Medical students often lack training in advanced communication skills encompassing emotionally fraught situations and those in which an intense emotional response is expected. Such skills are required for clinical situations encountered during residency. We created and evaluated an advanced communication skills workshop (ACSW) using standardized patients for senior medical students. The workshop emphasized communication skills for four scenarios-strong emotion, goals of care, medical error, and palliative care assessment-and utilized formative peer assessment and feedback. METHODS We created the four ACSW cases with case-specific communication behavior checklists and a common modified Master Interview Rating Scale in a Capstone Course for senior medical students. In groups of three, students rotated through three of four stations. Each student conducted one of the interviews while the other two completed the checklists and provided verbal feedback. We performed one-way analyses of variance on Likert responses and content analysis on open responses on a post-ACSW survey. RESULTS Ninety-one students completed the ACSW and survey. Students assigned high value to all four ACSW student roles: interviewer, observer, feedback recipient, and feedback provider. Students rated the experience above average to excellent on nearly all survey items. Open-response themes included "liked the opportunity to give or receive peer feedback" (46%) and "found the checklists helpful" (45%). DISCUSSION Feasible and well received by senior medical students, our ACSW offers an opportunity to practice and observe advanced communication skills and peer feedback. A peer-assisted, formative learning model, the ACSW efficiently addresses a key aspect of residency preparation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jaideep S. Talwalkar
- Associate Professor, Departments of Medicine and Pediatrics, and Director of Clinical Skills, Yale School of Medicine
| | - Auguste H. Fortin
- Professor, Department of Medicine, and Director of Communication Skills Education, Yale School of Medicine
| | - Laura J. Morrison
- Associate Professor, Department of Medicine, and Director of Hospice and Palliative Medicine Fellowship, Yale School of Medicine
| | - Alan Kliger
- Clinical Professor, Department of Medicine, Yale School of Medicine
| | - David I. Rosenthal
- Assistant Professor, Department of Medicine, and Director of Capstone Course, Yale School of Medicine
| | - Tanya Murtha
- Assistant Professor, Department of Pediatrics (Critical Care Medicine), Columbia University
| | - Matthew S. Ellman
- Professor, Department of Medicine, and Director of Medical Student Palliative and End-of-Life Care Education, Yale School of Medicine
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Bahig H, Rosenthal DI, Nguyen-Tan FP, Fuller DC, Yuan Y, Hutcheson KA, Christopoulos A, Nichols AC, Fung K, Ballivy O, Filion E, Ng SP, Lambert L, Dorth J, Hu KS, Palma D. Vocal-cord Only vs. Complete Laryngeal radiation (VOCAL): a randomized multicentric Bayesian phase II trial. BMC Cancer 2021; 21:446. [PMID: 33888069 PMCID: PMC8061218 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-021-08195-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2020] [Accepted: 04/14/2021] [Indexed: 02/03/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Radiotherapy, along with laser surgery, is considered a standard treatment option for patients with early glottic squamous cell cancer (SCC). Historically, patients have received complete larynx radiotherapy (CL-RT) due to fear of swallowing and respiratory laryngeal motion and this remains the standard approach in many academic institutions. Local control (LC) rates with CL-RT have been excellent, however this treatment can carry significant toxicities include adverse voice and swallowing outcomes, along with increased long-term risk of cerebrovascular morbidity. A recent retrospective study reported improved voice quality and similar local control outcomes with focused vocal cord radiotherapy (VC-RT) compared to CL-RT. There is currently no prospective evidence on the safety of VC-RT. The primary objective of this Bayesian Phase II trial is to compare the LC of VC-RT to that of CL-RT in patients with T1N0 glottic SCC. METHODS One hundred and fifty-five patients with T1a-b N0 SCC of the true vocal cords that are n ot candidate or declined laser surgery, will be randomized in a 1:3 ratio the control arm (CL-RT) and the experimental arm (VC-RT). Randomisation will be stratified by tumor stage (T1a/T1b) and by site (each site will be allowed to select one preferred radiation dose regimen, to be used in both arms). CL-RT volumes will correspond to the conventional RT volumes, with the planning target volume extending from the top of thyroid cartilage lamina superiorly to the bottom of the cricoid inferiorly. VC-RT volumes will include the involved vocal cord(s) and a margin accounting for respiration and set-up uncertainty. The primary endpoint will be LC at 2-years, while secondary endpoints will include patient-reported outcomes (voice impairment, dysphagia and symptom burden), acute and late toxicity radiation-induced toxicity, overall survival, progression free survival, as well as an optional component of acoustic and objective measures of voice analysis using the Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice. DISCUSSION This study would constitute the first prospective evidence on the efficacy and safety of VC-RT in early glottic cancer. If positive, this study would result in the adoption of VC-RT as standard approach in early glottic cancer. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03759431 Registration date: November 30, 2018.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Houda Bahig
- grid.410559.c0000 0001 0743 2111Radiation Oncology Department, Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, 1051 Sanguinet, Montreal, QC H2X 3E4 Canada
| | - David I. Rosenthal
- grid.240145.60000 0001 2291 4776Radiation Oncology Department, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe, Houston, TX 77030 USA
| | - Félix-Phuc Nguyen-Tan
- grid.410559.c0000 0001 0743 2111Radiation Oncology Department, Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, 1051 Sanguinet, Montreal, QC H2X 3E4 Canada
| | - David C. Fuller
- grid.240145.60000 0001 2291 4776Radiation Oncology Department, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe, Houston, TX 77030 USA
| | - Ying Yuan
- grid.240145.60000 0001 2291 4776Biostatistics Department, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA
| | - Katherine A. Hutcheson
- grid.240145.60000 0001 2291 4776Head and Neck Surgery Department, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA
| | - Apostolos Christopoulos
- grid.410559.c0000 0001 0743 2111Head and Neck Surgery Department, Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada
| | - Anthony C. Nichols
- grid.39381.300000 0004 1936 8884Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Western University, London, Ontario Canada
| | - Kevin Fung
- grid.39381.300000 0004 1936 8884Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Western University, London, Ontario Canada
| | - Olivier Ballivy
- grid.410559.c0000 0001 0743 2111Radiation Oncology Department, Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, 1051 Sanguinet, Montreal, QC H2X 3E4 Canada
| | - Edith Filion
- grid.410559.c0000 0001 0743 2111Radiation Oncology Department, Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, 1051 Sanguinet, Montreal, QC H2X 3E4 Canada
| | - Sweet Ping Ng
- grid.1055.10000000403978434Radiation Oncology Department, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Louise Lambert
- Radiation Oncology Department, Centre Intégré de Cancérologie de Laval, Laval, Canada
| | - Jennifer Dorth
- grid.67105.350000 0001 2164 3847Radiation Oncology Department, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, USA
| | - Kenneth S. Hu
- Radiation Oncology Department, NYU Langone Health, Newyork, USA
| | - David Palma
- grid.39381.300000 0004 1936 8884Radiation Oncology Department, Western University, London, Ontario Canada
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Ning MS, Das P, Rosenthal DI, Dabaja BS, Liao Z, Chang JY, Gomez DR, Klopp AH, Gunn GB, Allen PK, Nitsch PL, Natter RB, Briere TM, Herman JM, Wells R, Koong AC, McAleer MF. Early and Midtreatment Mortality in Palliative Radiotherapy: Emphasizing Patient Selection in High-Quality End-of-Life Care. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2021; 19:805-813. [PMID: 33878727 DOI: 10.6004/jnccn.2020.7664] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2020] [Accepted: 09/28/2020] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Palliative radiotherapy (RT) is effective, but some patients die during treatment or too soon afterward to experience benefit. This study investigates end-of-life RT patterns to inform shared decision-making and facilitate treatment consistent with palliative goals. MATERIALS AND METHODS All patients who died ≤6 months after initiating palliative RT at an academic cancer center between 2015 and 2018 were identified. Associations with time-to-death, early mortality (≤30 days), and midtreatment mortality were analyzed. RESULTS In total, 1,620 patients died ≤6 months from palliative RT initiation, including 574 (34%) deaths at ≤30 days and 222 (14%) midtreatment. Median survival was 43 days from RT start (95% CI, 41-45) and varied by site (P<.001), ranging from 36 (head and neck) to 53 days (dermal/soft tissue). On multivariable analysis, earlier time-to-death was associated with osseous (hazard ratio [HR], 1.33; P<.001) and head and neck (HR, 1.45; P<.001) sites, multiple RT courses ≤6 months (HR, 1.65; P<.001), and multisite treatments (HR, 1.40; P=.008), whereas stereotactic technique (HR, 0.77; P<.001) and more recent treatment year (HR, 0.82; P<.001) were associated with longer survival. No difference in time to death was noted among patients prescribed conventional RT in 1 to 10 versus >10 fractions (median, 40 vs 47 days; P=.272), although the latter entailed longer courses. The 30-day mortality group included 335 (58%) inpatients, who were 27% more likely to die midtreatment (P=.031). On multivariable analysis, midtreatment mortality among these inpatients was associated with thoracic (odds ratio [OR], 2.95; P=.002) and central nervous system (CNS; OR, 2.44; P=.002) indications, >5-fraction courses (OR, 3.27; P<.001), and performance status of 3 to 4 (OR, 1.63; P=.050). Conversely, palliative/supportive care consultation was associated with decreased midtreatment mortality (OR, 0.60; P=.045). CONCLUSIONS Earlier referrals and hypofractionated courses (≤5-10 treatments) should be routinely considered for palliative RT indications, given the short life expectancies of patients at this stage in their disease course. Providers should exercise caution for emergent thoracic and CNS indications among inpatients with poor prognoses due to high midtreatment mortality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Daniel R Gomez
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | | | | | | | - Paige L Nitsch
- Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | | | - Tina M Briere
- Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Joseph M Herman
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Lake Success, New York
| | - Rebecca Wells
- Department of Management, Policy, and Community Health, University of Texas Health Science Center School of Public Health, Houston, Texas; and
| | | | | |
Collapse
|