Efficacy and Safety of Ensovibep for Adults Hospitalized With COVID-19 : A Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

Ensovibep (MP0420) is a designed ankyrin repeat protein, a novel class of engineered proteins, under investigation as a treatment of SARS-CoV-2 infection.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate if ensovibep, in addition to remdesivir and other standard care, improves clinical outcomes among patients hospitalized with COVID-19 compared with standard care alone.

DESIGN

Double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, clinical trial. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04501978).

SETTING

Multinational, multicenter trial.

PARTICIPANTS

Adults hospitalized with COVID-19.

INTERVENTION

Intravenous ensovibep, 600 mg, or placebo.

MEASUREMENTS

Ensovibep was assessed for early futility on the basis of pulmonary ordinal scores at day 5. The primary outcome was time to sustained recovery through day 90, defined as 14 consecutive days at home or place of usual residence after hospital discharge. A composite safety outcome that included death, serious adverse events, end-organ disease, and serious infections was assessed through day 90.

RESULTS

An independent data and safety monitoring board recommended that enrollment be halted for early futility after 485 patients were randomly assigned and received an infusion of ensovibep (n = 247) or placebo (n = 238). The odds ratio (OR) for a more favorable pulmonary outcome in the ensovibep (vs. placebo) group at day 5 was 0.93 (95% CI, 0.67 to 1.30; P = 0.68; OR > 1 would favor ensovibep). The 90-day cumulative incidence of sustained recovery was 82% for ensovibep and 80% for placebo (subhazard ratio [sHR], 1.06 [CI, 0.88 to 1.28]; sHR > 1 would favor ensovibep). The primary composite safety outcome at day 90 occurred in 78 ensovibep participants (32%) and 70 placebo participants (29%) (HR, 1.07 [CI, 0.77 to 1.47]; HR < 1 would favor ensovibep).

LIMITATION

The trial was prematurely stopped because of futility, limiting power for the primary outcome.

CONCLUSION

Compared with placebo, ensovibep did not improve clinical outcomes for hospitalized participants with COVID-19 receiving standard care, including remdesivir; no safety concerns were identified.

PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE

National Institutes of Health.

A Randomized, Controlled Trial of Ebola Virus Disease Therapeutics

BACKGROUND

Although several experimental therapeutics for Ebola virus disease (EVD) have been developed, the safety and efficacy of the most promising therapies need to be assessed in the context of a randomized, controlled trial.

METHODS

We conducted a trial of four investigational therapies for EVD in the Democratic Republic of Congo, where an outbreak began in August 2018. Patients of any age who had a positive result for Ebola virus RNA on reverse-transcriptase-polymerase-chain-reaction assay were enrolled. All patients received standard care and were randomly assigned in a 1:1:1:1 ratio to intravenous administration of the triple monoclonal antibody ZMapp (the control group), the antiviral agent remdesivir, the single monoclonal antibody MAb114, or the triple monoclonal antibody REGN-EB3. The REGN-EB3 group was added in a later version of the protocol, so data from these patients were compared with those of patients in the ZMapp group who were enrolled at or after the time the REGN-EB3 group was added (the ZMapp subgroup). The primary end point was death at 28 days.

RESULTS

A total of 681 patients were enrolled from November 20, 2018, to August 9, 2019, at which time the data and safety monitoring board recommended that patients be assigned only to the MAb114 and REGN-EB3 groups for the remainder of the trial; the recommendation was based on the results of an interim analysis that showed superiority of these groups to ZMapp and remdesivir with respect to mortality. At 28 days, death had occurred in 61 of 174 patients (35.1%) in the MAb114 group, as compared with 84 of 169 (49.7%) in the ZMapp group (P = 0.007), and in 52 of 155 (33.5%) in the REGN-EB3 group, as compared with 79 of 154 (51.3%) in the ZMapp subgroup (P = 0.002). A shorter duration of symptoms before admission and lower baseline values for viral load and for serum creatinine and aminotransferase levels each correlated with improved survival. Four serious adverse events were judged to be potentially related to the trial drugs.

CONCLUSIONS

Both MAb114 and REGN-EB3 were superior to ZMapp in reducing mortality from EVD. Scientifically and ethically sound clinical research can be conducted during disease outbreaks and can help inform the outbreak response. (Funded by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases and others; PALM ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03719586.).

[Patients treated for one year with tianeptine. Results at one of the centers of South-Eastern France]

Tianeptine is a new antidepressant with a tricyclic molecular structure. Its main neurochemical effect consists in an increase in serotonine re-uptake. Its efficacy as antidepressant and its good clinical safety have been confirmed in controlled trials against reference drugs. 1,231 patients with a DSM III diagnosis of major depression or dysthymic disorder were included in a long-term trial with tianeptine. 510 patients completed the one-year treatment period. The results of a subgroup of 100 patients treated in one of the centres of south-east France will be presented. 47 of these patients completed the trial. This study allowed to evaluate the therapeutic efficacy as well as the clinical safety of tianeptine during long-term prescription. Patients were treated in an open design after a 4-7 day placebo washout period. Therapeutic effects were assessed by the C.G.I. items (1 and 2), MADRS, HARS and HSCL. For the evaluation of clinical and paraclinical safety, spontaneous complaints of the patients and CGI-3 were documented; body weight, blood pressure and blood chemistry were also measured. Homogeneity between completers and non-completers was tested before statistical analysis of the clinical effects. Results of completers were analyzed using a two-way ANOVA (time x subjects); Newman-Keuls tests were performed in the case of a significant time effect. End-point analysis was used to test the results of the total sample. Patients completing the trial had a mean MADRS baseline score of 32.8. Given high this score, the patients have to be considered genuinely depressed at inclusion.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

[Detection of bronchial cancer recurrence in fibrothorax using nuclear magnetic resonance tomography]

A case is reported in which magnetic resonance imaging successfully differentiated tumour nodules from the connective tissue of a fibrothorax. Computed tomography of the thorax had previously failed to distinguish the tumour tissue. This clearly makes magnetic resonance superior to computed tomography in the differentiation of different tissues within a fibrothorax.

[Phase II study with etoposide/vincristine in small cell bronchial cancer (extensive disease)]

The remission rates achieved with the combination of vincristine and etoposide are comparable with other frequently employed therapeutic regimens (ACO/EPICO, cisplatin/etoposide). The combination of etoposide with vincristine represents an alternative, in particular with respect to a merely palliative approach to treatment.

[Value of bronchoalveolar lavage and findings of cytologic studies in the diagnosis of interstitial lung diseases]

In 27 patients with roentgenologically suspected interstitial pulmonary disease, bronchoscopy was carried out with the rigid bronchoscope. The examination material obtained (BAL fluid, transbronchial lung biopsy, perbronchial lymph node biopsy, mucosal biopsy) was submitted to a histological and cytological work-up. The established cell distribution in the BAL fluid confirmed the findings reported in the literature. In sarcoidosis, irrespective of the roentgenological stage, a 30 to 35% lymphocytosis was observed. The combination of BAL, perbronchial lymph node biopsy, transbronchial lung biopsy and bronchial mucosal biopsy permitted confirmation of the sarcoidosis in more than 90% of the cases. The -hit rate- of the perbronchial lymph node biopsy was 90.6% in stage 1, 85% in stage 2, and 77% in stage 3.

[Is there any justification to the scintigraphy and echotomography B association for the tracking down of hepatic metastases? (author's transl)]

Regarding the tracking down of hepatic metastases, a study was made on 58 patients presenting either digestive or genital adenocarcinoma. The determining criterion of selection was the carrying out of the three following tests within the same month (Technetium 99 Scintigraphy, Echotomography B and surgery). The global breakdown of exact answers is in favour of echography (72% against 53%), echography being more reliable than scintigraphy. Therefore echotomography B seems to be the first morphological method that should be proposed; and for improving the tracking down, scintigraphy makes the interpretation of the results more difficult, and reduces the number of correct answers.