Sternal fractures and thoracic injury: an analysis of 288 sternal fractures attending a major trauma centre

INTRODUCTION

Sternal fractures (SF) are uncommon injuries usually associated with a significant mechanism of injury. Concomitant injury is likely, and a risk of mortality is substantial.

AIM

Our aim in this study was to identify the risk factors for mortality in patients who had sustained sternal fractures.

METHODS

We conducted a single centre retrospective review of the trust's Trauma Audit and Research Network Database, from May 2014 to July 2021. Our inclusion criteria were any patients who had sustained a sternal fracture. The regions of injury were defined using the Abbreviated Injury Score. Pearson Chi-Squared, Fisher Exact tests and multivariate regression analyses were performed using IBM SPSS.

RESULTS

A total of 249 patients were identified to have sustained a SF. There were 19 patients (7.63%) who had died. The most common concomitant injuries with SF were Rib fractures (56%), Lung Contusions (31.15%) and Haemothorax (21.88%). There was a significant increase in age (59.93 vs 70.06, p = .037) and admission troponin (36.34 vs. 100.50, p = .003) in those who died. There was a significantly lower GCS in those who died (10.05 vs. 14.01, p < .001). On multi regression analysis, bilateral rib injury (p = 0.037, OR 1.104) was the only nominal variable which showed significance in mortality.

CONCLUSION

Sternal Fractures are uncommon but serious injuries. Our review has identified that bilateral rib injuries, increase in age, low GCS, and high admission troponin in the context of SF, were associated with mortality.

Prognostic indicators and outcomes of hospitalised COVID-19 patients with neurological disease: An individual patient data meta-analysis

Background

Neurological COVID-19 disease has been reported widely, but published studies often lack information on neurological outcomes and prognostic risk factors. We aimed to describe the spectrum of neurological disease in hospitalised COVID-19 patients; characterise clinical outcomes; and investigate factors associated with a poor outcome.

Methods

We conducted an individual patient data (IPD) meta-analysis of hospitalised patients with neurological COVID-19 disease, using standard case definitions. We invited authors of studies from the first pandemic wave, plus clinicians in the Global COVID-Neuro Network with unpublished data, to contribute. We analysed features associated with poor outcome (moderate to severe disability or death, 3 to 6 on the modified Rankin Scale) using multivariable models.

Results

We included 83 studies (31 unpublished) providing IPD for 1979 patients with COVID-19 and acute new-onset neurological disease. Encephalopathy (978 [49%] patients) and cerebrovascular events (506 [26%]) were the most common diagnoses. Respiratory and systemic symptoms preceded neurological features in 93% of patients; one third developed neurological disease after hospital admission. A poor outcome was more common in patients with cerebrovascular events (76% [95% CI 67–82]), than encephalopathy (54% [42–65]). Intensive care use was high (38% [35–41]) overall, and also greater in the cerebrovascular patients. In the cerebrovascular, but not encephalopathic patients, risk factors for poor outcome included breathlessness on admission and elevated D-dimer. Overall, 30-day mortality was 30% [27–32]. The hazard of death was comparatively lower for patients in the WHO European region.

Interpretation

Neurological COVID-19 disease poses a considerable burden in terms of disease outcomes and use of hospital resources from prolonged intensive care and inpatient admission; preliminary data suggest these may differ according to WHO regions and country income levels. The different risk factors for encephalopathy and stroke suggest different disease mechanisms which may be amenable to intervention, especially in those who develop neurological symptoms after hospital admission.

Olecranon fractures: applied anatomy, clinical assessment and evidence-based management

Olecranon fractures are common injuries, making up 10% of all fractures of the upper limb. They usually result from a fall from standing height in older people, or from a direct blow in young people. The olecranon's superficial location, with poor soft tissue and muscle protection, make it liable to fracture following direct impact.

Factors such as the degree of initial force and the quality of the patient's bone result in a range of injury patterns, from simple undisplaced fractures to complex open fracture dislocations. In the context of high energy trauma, the patient should first be assessed for life-threatening injuries. A thorough history and clinical examination including neurovascular assessment should then be completed. Antero-posterior and lateral X-rays are sufficient to confirm the diagnosis. Initial management includes immobilisation in an above elbow backslab, a sling and analgesia.

Owing to the pull of the triceps muscle which attaches to the tip of the olecranon, fracture displacement is common and surgical intervention is often required, usually with good outcomes. Surgical techniques include tension band wiring, open reduction internal fixation with a pre-contoured locking plate and tension band suture fixation. Undisplaced fractures or displaced fractures in older patients can be managed conservatively with an above elbow cast for 4 weeks. This article covers applied anatomy, initial presentation, clinical assessment and evidence-based management.

266 The Effect of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Emergency Theatre Mortality, Time to Intervention and Length of Stay in the First Phase of National Lockdown at a District General Hospital

Aim

This study aimed to investigate the patient population requiring emergency surgery during the first phase of lockdown due to COVID-19 in the United Kingdom and compare it to the equivalent population in the same calendar period for 2019. Thus, we aimed to evaluate the impact of the pandemic on emergency operations.

Method

We retrospectively reviewed patients undergoing surgery in emergency theatres at our district general hospital between March 23^rd and May 11^th in 2019 and 2020. Data collected included demographics (age/gender), National Confidential Enquiry into Patient Outcome and Death (NCEPOD) category and operation. The primary outcome was 90-day post-operative mortality; secondary outcomes included time to intervention and length of inpatient stay.

Results

132 (2020) versus 141 (2019) patients were included with no significant difference in age (p = 0.676) nor sex (p = 0.230). There was no difference in overall 90-day postoperative mortality (p = 0.196). Notably, time to intervention was faster for NCEPOD code 3 patients in 2020 than in 2019 (p = 0.027). Time to intervention in 2020 was longer for those dying within 90 days post-operatively compared to survivors (p = 0.02). There was no difference in length of stay between the years, both overall and when conducting subgroup analyses by NCEPOD category or procedures (fractured neck of femur (p = 0.776), laparoscopies (p = 0.866), laparotomies (p = 0.252)), except for upper limb trauma (p = 0.007).

Conclusions

Patients were appropriately prioritised with no overall change in mortality or length of stay. A national validation audit assessing outcomes of emergency operations during these challenging times would further elucidate risks posed to surgical patients requiring urgent care.

O33 Outcomes of patients undergoing emergency surgery during the first phase of national lockdown in the United Kingdom due to COVID-19 pandemic: experience at a district general hospital

Introduction

This study aimed to assess the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on emergency operations during the first phase of lockdown in the United Kingdom, compared to the equivalent population in the same calendar period in 2019.

Method

We retrospectively reviewed patients undergoing surgery in emergency theatres at our district general hospital between March 23rd and May 11th in 2019 and 2020. Data collected included demographics, National Confidential Enquiry into Patient Outcome and Death (NCEPOD) category and procedure. The primary outcome was 90-day post-operative mortality; secondary outcomes included time to intervention and length of inpatient stay.

Result

132 patients (2020) versus 141 (2019) patients were included with no significant difference in age (P = 0.676), sex (P = 0.230), or overall 90-day postoperative mortality (P = 0.196). Notably, time to intervention was faster for NCEPOD code 3 patients in 2020 than 2019 (P = 0.027). Time to intervention in 2020 was longer for those dying within 90 days post-operatively compared to survivors (P = 0.02). There was no difference in length of stay between years, both overall and when comparing subgroups by NCEPOD category or procedures (fractured neck of femur (P = 0.776), laparoscopies (P = 0.866), laparotomies (P = 0.252)), except for upper limb trauma (P = 0.007).

Conclusion

This study is amongst the first describing the general case mix in emergency theatres in the UK. Patient pre-operative characteristics and demographics did not change. Our data confirms patient prioritisation according to NCEPOD recommendations and streamlining of surgical services, with no difference in overall mortality, time to intervention or length of stay compared to 2019.

Take-home Message

At this district general hospital, patients were appropriately prioritised, and our results show adaptation of hospital practice to emerging national guidelines during the first phase of lockdown. A national validation audit assessing morbidity and mortality outcomes for all NCEPOD patients may be facilitate further understanding of risks posed to patients requiring urgent surgery during these unprecedented times.

Molecular sequencing technologies in the diagnosis and management of prosthetic joint infections

INTRODUCTION

Prosthetic joint infections (PJIs) can be challenging to eradicate and have high morbidity and mortality. Current microbiology culture methods can be associated with a high false-negative rate of up to 50%. Early and accurate diagnosis is crucial for effective treatment, and negative results have been linked to a greater rate of reoperation.

AREAS COVERED

There has been increasing investigation of the use of next-generation sequencing (NGS) technology such as metagenomic shotgun sequencing to help identify causative organisms and decrease the uncertainty around culture-negative infections. The clinical importance of the organisms detected and their management, however, requires further study. The polymerase chain reaction (PCR) has shown promise, but in recent years multiple studies have reported similar or lower sensitivity for bacteria detection in PJIs when compared to traditional culture. Furthermore, issues such as high cost and complexity of sample preparation and data analysis are to be addressed before it can move further toward routine clinical practice.

EXPERT OPINION

Metagenomic NGS has shown results that inspire cautious optimism - both in culture-positive and culture-negative cases of joint infection. Refinement of technique could revolutionize the way PJIs are diagnosed, managed, and drastically improve outcomes from this currently devastating complication.

COVID-19 pandemic did not affect emergency theatre patient demographic and length of stay in the first phase of UK countrywide lockdown in a district general hospital

INTRODUCTION

We aim to identify any changes in outcome for patients undergoing nonelective surgery at the start of the UK pandemic in our district general hospital. This was a single-centre retrospective cohort review of a UK district general hospital serving a population of over 250,000 people.

METHODS

Participants were all patients undergoing a surgical procedure in the acute theatre list between 23 March to 11 May in both 2019 and 2020. Primary outcome was 90-day postoperative mortality. Secondary outcomes include time to surgical intervention and length of inpatient stay.

RESULTS

A total of 132 patients (2020) versus 141 (2019) patients were included. Although overall 90-day postoperative mortality was higher in 2020 (9.8%) compared with 2019 (5.7%), this difference was not statistically significant (p=0.196). In 2020, eight patients tested positive for COVID-19 either as an inpatient or within 2 weeks of discharge, of whom five patients died. Time to surgical intervention was significantly faster for NCEPOD (National Confidential Enquiry into Patient Outcome and Death) code 3 patients in 2020 than in 2019 (p=0.027). There were no significant differences in mean length of inpatient stay.

CONCLUSIONS

We found that patients were appropriately prioritised using NCEPOD classification, with no statistically significant differences in 90-day postoperative mortality and length of inpatient stay compared with the 2019 period. A study on a larger scale would further elucidate the profile and outcomes of patients requiring acute surgery to generate statistical significance.