The Value of Rotavirus Vaccination in Europe: A Call for Action

The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic has pushed many healthcare systems into crisis. High vaccine coverage amongst children reduces emergency room presentations, hospital admissions and deaths due to vaccine-preventable diseases, freeing up healthcare resources including polymerase chain reaction testing for patients with SARS-CoV-2. In Europe, rotavirus gastroenteritis leads to 75,000-150,000 hospitalisations and up to 600,000 medical encounters annually. Nevertheless, in 2022, only 18 countries in Europe (out of 38) have a publicly funded routine universal mass immunisation programme against rotavirus gastroenteritis. Evidence available in the last few years re-emphasises that rotavirus vaccines currently available in Europe are highly effective, preventing up to 96% of rotavirus-related hospitalisations in children less than 1 year of age (potentially 72,000-144,000 hospitalisations Europe-wide). Long-term surveillance indicates that rotavirus vaccination does not result in an overall increase in intussusception. On the contrary, increasing evidence suggests an overall reduction in intussusception in the first 12 months of life when early, high rotavirus vaccine coverage is achieved. Prevention of rotavirus gastroenteritis has marked positive impacts on parental wages and government tax revenue, with benefits extending across the whole economy. In the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic setting there is a new imperative to achieve high levels of paediatric vaccination against vaccine-preventable diseases, including rotavirus gastroenteritis. The introduction of rotavirus universal mass vaccination can be expected to reduce the number of preventable illnesses, hospitalisations and deaths caused by rotavirus gastroenteritis. Reducing vaccine-preventable diseases is particularly urgent at this time when healthcare systems are preoccupied and overwhelmed with SARS-CoV-2. Graphical abstract available for this article.

A review of recommendations for rotavirus vaccination in Europe: Arguments for change

BACKGROUND

More than 10 years after the authorisation of two rotavirus vaccines of demonstrated efficacy and with a strongly positive benefit-risk profile, uptake in Europe remains low. Only 13 countries in Europe provide a fully-funded rotavirus universal mass vaccination (UMV) programme, three provide a partially-funded programme, and one provides full funding for a reduced programme targeting at-risk infants. Around 40% of countries in Europe currently have no existing recommendations for rotavirus vaccine use in children from the national government.

METHODS

We provide an overview of the status of rotavirus vaccine recommendations across Europe and the factors impeding uptake. We consider the evidence for the benefits and risks of vaccination, and argue that cost-effectiveness and cost-saving benefits justify greater access to rotavirus vaccines for infants living in Europe.

RESULTS

Lack of awareness of the direct and indirect burden caused by rotavirus disease, potential cost-saving from rotavirus vaccination including considerable benefits to children, families and society, and government/insurer cost constraints all contribute to complacency at different levels of health policy in individual countries.

CONCLUSIONS

More than 10 years after their introduction, available data confirm the benefits and acceptable safety profile of infant rotavirus UMV programmes. Europe serves to gain considerably from rotavirus UMV in terms of reductions in healthcare resource utilization and related costs in both vaccinated subjects and their unvaccinated siblings through herd protection.

[Pelvic varicose veins thrombosis in a patient with pulmonary embolism]

We describe hereafter a case of idiopathic varicose veins in a patient with pulmonary embolism. To our knowledge, the condition has not been reported yet in the literature and enhances the usefulness of complementing the workup of pulmonary embolism by pelvic examination.

Comparative bioavailability of a metoprolol controlled release formulation and a bisoprolol normal release tablet after single oral dose administration in healthy volunteers

The bioavailability patterns of a 100 mg metoprolol controlled release tablet and a 10 mg bisoprolol normal release tablet were compared in a single dose crossover study in 12 healthy subjects. The plasma drug concentration levels were measured for 36 h post-dose, using HPLC with fluorimetric detection. The 2 formulations were equally well tolerated, headache being the most frequently reported adverse event. Episodes of bradycardia (heart rate < 50 bpm) occurred at a similar rate with both formulations. The plasma metoprolol profile differed significantly (p < 0.05) from the bisoprolol profile regarding time to maximum concentration, mean residence time, the ratio of peak concentration (Cmax) to the area under the curve (AUC) and the plateau time as estimated from the half-value duration. The average drug plasma concentration observed 24 h after administration still accounted for 54% of the Cmax value for the metoprolol controlled release tablet, but only 23% with the bisoprolol normal release tablet. A large inter-individual variability was seen in the bioavailability of metoprolol, with 3 subjects (characterised as CYP2D6 deficient) exhibiting AUC values 8 - 10 times larger than in the other subjects. The controlled release pattern of the formulation was similar in slow and fast metabolizers. No such variability pattern was apparent for bisoprolol. The findings allow to conclude that, after administration of the metoprolol controlled release tablet, the rate of absorption of the active principle is significantly slower, therefore yielding more constant plasma concentration levels over the 24 h post-dose period, than after administration of the bisoprolol normal release tablet.