Competitive Interactions Between Propofol and Diazepam: Studies in GABAA Receptors and Zebrafish

Although propofol is among the most commonly administered general anesthetics, its mechanism of action is not fully understood. It has been hypothesized that propofol acts via a similar mechanism as (R)-ethyl 1-(1-phenylethyl)-1H-imidazole-5-carboxylate (etomidate) by binding within the GABAA receptor transmembrane receptor domain at the two β +/α - subunit interfaces with resultant positive allosteric modulation. To test this hypothesis, we leveraged the ability of diazepam to bind to those sites and act as a competitive antagonist. We used oocyte-expressed α 1 β 3 γ 2L GABAA receptors to define the actions of diazepam (± flumazenil) on currents activated or potentiated by propofol and a zebrafish activity assay to define the impact of diazepam and flumazenil on propofol-induced anesthesia. We found that diazepam increased the amplitudes of GABAA receptor-mediated currents at nanomolar concentrations but reduced them at micromolar concentrations. The current amplitude changes produced by nanomolar diazepam concentrations were inhibited by flumazenil whereas those produced by micromolar diazepam concentrations were not. Studies of agonist potentiation showed that the micromolar inhibitory action of diazepam was surmountable by high concentrations of propofol and produced a rightward shift in the propofol concentration-response curve characterized by a Schild slope not statistically significantly different from 1, consistent with competition between diazepam and propofol. Although micromolar concentrations of diazepam (plus flumazenil) similarly reduced GABAA receptor currents modulated by propofol and etomidate, it only reduced the anesthetic actions of etomidate. We conclude that while both propofol and etomidate can modulate GABAA receptors by binding to the β +/α - subunit interfacial sites, propofol-induced anesthesia likely involves additional target sites. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Although the drug combination of diazepam and flumazenil reverses the GABAA receptor positive modulatory actions of both propofol and (R)-ethyl 1-(1-phenylethyl)-1H-imidazole-5-carboxylate (etomidate), it only reverses the in vivo anesthetic actions of etomidate. These results strongly suggest that distinct mechanisms of action account for the anesthetic actions of these two commonly administered anesthetic agents.

Pharmacological management of severe Cushing's syndrome: the role of etomidate

Cushing's syndrome (CS) is an endocrine disease characterized by excessive adrenocortical steroid production. One of the mainstay pharmacological treatments for CS are steroidogenesis enzyme inhibitors, including the antifungal agent ketoconazole along with metyrapone, mitotane, and aminoglutethimide. Recently, osilodrostat was added to this drug class and approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of Cushing's Disease. Steroidogenesis enzyme inhibitors inhibit various enzymes along the cortisol biosynthetic pathway and may be used preoperatively to lower cortisol levels and reduce surgical risk associated with tumor resection or postoperatively when surgery and/or radiation therapies are not curative. Because their selectivities for steroidogenic enzymes vary, they may even be administered in combination to achieve relatively rapid control of severe hypercortisolemia. Unfortunately, all currently available inhibitors are accompanied by serious adverse side effects that limit dosing and often result in treatment failures. Although more commonly known as a general anesthetic induction agent, etomidate is another member of the steroidogenesis enzyme inhibitor drug class. It suppresses cortisol production primarily by inhibiting 11β-hydroxylase and is the only inhibitor that may be given parenterally. However, the sedative-hypnotic actions of etomidate limit its use as an acute management option for CS. Thus, some have recommended that it be used only in intensive care settings. In this review, we discuss the initial development of etomidate as an anesthetic agent, its subsequent development as a treatment for CS, and the recent advances in dosing and drug development that dissociate sedative-hypnotic and adrenostatic drug actions to facilitate CS treatment in non-critical care settings.

Selective actions of benzodiazepines at the transmembrane anaesthetic binding sites of the GABAA receptor: In vitro and in vivo studies

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

In addition to binding to the classical high-affinity extracellular benzodiazepine binding site of the GABAA receptor, some benzodiazepines occupy transmembrane inter-subunit anaesthetic sites that bind etomidate (β+ /α- sites) or the barbiturate derivative R-mTFD-MPAB (α+ /β- and γ+ /β- sites). We aimed to define the functional effects of these interactions on GABAA receptor activity and animal behaviour.

EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH

With flumazenil blocking classical high-affinity extracellular benzodiazepine site effects, modulation of GABA-activated currents by diazepam, midazolam and flurazepam was measured electrophysiologically in wildtype and M2-15' mutant α1 β3 γ2L GABAA receptors. Zebrafish locomotive activity was also assessed in the presence of each benzodiazepine plus flumazenil.

KEY RESULTS

In the presence of flumazenil, micromolar concentrations of diazepam and midazolam both potentiated and inhibited wildtype GABAA receptor currents. β3 N265M (M2-15' in the β+ /α- sites) and α1 S270I (M2-15' in the α+ /β- site) mutations reduced or abolished potentiation by these drugs. In contrast, the γ2 S280W mutation (M2-15' in the γ+ /β- site) abolished inhibition. Flurazepam plus flumazenil only inhibited wildtype receptor currents, an effect unaltered by M2-15' mutations. In the presence of flumazenil, zebrafish locomotion was enhanced by diazepam at concentrations up to 30 μM and suppressed at 100 μM, suppressed by midazolam and enhanced by flurazepam.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

Benzodiazepine binding to transmembrane anaesthetic binding sites of the GABAA receptor can produce positive or negative modulation manifesting as decreases or increases in locomotion, respectively. Selectivity for these sites may contribute to the distinct GABAA receptor and behavioural actions of different benzodiazepines, particularly at high (i.e. anaesthetic) concentrations.

Computational Approaches to Anesthetic Drug Discovery

All currently available general anesthetics produce potentially deadly side effects. Unfortunately, few approaches have been developed to design safer ones, despite important advances in anesthetic mechanisms research. Cayla and colleagues recently showed that computational methods can be used to identify anesthetic lead compounds devoid of specific side effects.

Behavioral and steroidogenic pharmacology of phenyl ring substituted etomidate analogs in rats

Background

Cushing’s syndrome is an endocrine disorder characterized by the overproduction of adrenocortical steroids. Steroidogenesis enzyme inhibitors are the mainstays of pharmacological treatment. Unfortunately, they produce significant side effects. Among the most potent inhibitors is the general anesthetic etomidate whose GABA_A receptor-mediated sedative-hypnotic actions restrict use. In this study, we defined the sedative-hypnotic and steroidogenesis inhibiting actions of etomidate and four phenyl-ring substituted etomidate analogs (dimethoxy-etomidate, isopropoxy-etomidate, naphthalene-etomidate, and naphthalene (2)-etomidate) that possess negligible GABA_A receptor modulatory activities.

Methods

In the first set of experiments, male Sprague-Dawley rats were assessed for loss of righting reflexes (LoRR) after receiving intravenous boluses of either etomidate (1 mg/kg) or an etomidate analog (40 mg/kg). In the second set of experiments, rats were assessed for LoRR and their abilities to produce adrenocortical and androgenic steroids after receiving 2-h infusions (0.5 mg kg^− 1 min^− 1) of either etomidate or an etomidate analog.

Results

All rats that received etomidate boluses or infusions had LoRR that persisted for minutes or hours, respectively. In contrast, no rat that received an etomidate analog had LoRR. Compared to rats in the vehicle control group, rats that received etomidate analog infusions had plasma corticosterone and aldosterone concentrations that were reduced by 80–84% and 68–94%, respectively. Rats that received etomidate infusions had plasma corticosterone and aldosterone concentrations that were also significantly reduced (by 92 and 96%, respectively). Rats that received etomidate or isopropoxy-etomidate had significant reductions (90 and 57%, respectively) in plasma testosterone concentrations whereas those that received naphthalene-etomidate had significant increases (1400%) in plasma dehydroepiandrosterone concentrations. Neither etomidate nor any etomidate analog significantly affected plasma androstenedione and dihydrotestosterone concentrations.

Conclusions

Our studies demonstrate that the four phenyl-ring substituted etomidate analogs form a novel class of compounds that are devoid of sedative-hypnotic activities and suppress plasma concentrations of adrenocortical steroids but vary in their effects on plasma concentrations of androgenic steroids.

Sources of Variation in Anesthetic Drug Costs

BACKGROUND

Increasing attention has been focused on health care expenditures, which include anesthetic-related drug costs. Using data from 2 large academic medical centers, we sought to identify significant contributors to anesthetic drug cost variation.

METHODS

Using anesthesia information management systems, we calculated volatile and intravenous drug costs for 8 types of inpatient surgical procedures performed from July 1, 2009, to December 31, 2011. For each case, we determined patient age, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status, gender, institution, case duration, in-room provider, and attending anesthesiologist. These variables were then entered into 2 fixed-effects linear regression models, both with logarithmically transformed case cost as the outcome variable. The first model included duration, attending anesthesiologist, patient age, ASA physical status, and patient gender as independent variables. The second model included case type, institution, patient age, ASA physical status, and patient gender as independent variables. When all variables were entered into 1 model, redundancy analyses showed that case type was highly correlated (R = 0.92) with the other variables in the model. More specifically, a model that included case type was no better at predicting cost than a model without the variable, as long as that model contained the combination of attending anesthesiologist and case duration. Therefore, because we were interested in determining the effect both variables had on cost, 2 models were created instead of 1. The average change in cost resulting from each variable compared to the average cost of the reference category was calculated by first exponentiating the β coefficient and subtracting 1 to get the percent difference in cost. We then multiplied that value by the mean cost of the associated reference group.

RESULTS

A total of 5504 records were identified, of which 4856 were analyzed. The median anesthetic drug cost was $38.45 (25th percentile = $23.23, 75th percentile = $63.82). The majority of the variation was not described by our models-35.2% was explained in the model containing case duration, and 32.3% was explained in the model containing case type. However, the largest sources of variation our models identified were attending anesthesiologist, case type, and procedure duration. With all else held constant, the average change in cost between attending anesthesiologists ranged from a cost decrease of $41.25 to a cost increase of $95.67 (10th percentile = -$19.96, 90th percentile = +$20.20) when compared to the provider with the median value for mean cost per case. The average change in cost between institutions was significant but minor ($5.73).

CONCLUSIONS

The majority of the variation was not described by the models, possibly indicating high per-case random variation. The largest sources of variation identified by our models included attending anesthesiologist, procedure type, and case duration. The difference in cost between institutions was statistically significant but was minor. While many prior studies have found significant savings resulting from cost-reducing interventions, our findings suggest that because the overall cost of anesthetic drugs was small, the savings resulting from interventions focused on the clinical practice of attending anesthesiologists may be negligible, especially in institutions where access to more expensive drugs is already limited. Thus, cost-saving efforts may be better focused elsewhere.

Anesthetic Drug Discovery and Development: A Case Study of Novel Etomidate Analogs

All currently available general anesthetic agents possess potentially lethal side effects requiring their administration by highly trained clinicians. Among these agents is etomidate, a highly potent imidazole-based intravenous sedative-hypnotic that deleteriously suppresses the synthesis of adrenocortical steroids in a manner that is both potent and persistent. We developed two distinct strategies to design etomidate analogs that retain etomidate's potent hypnotic activity, but produce less adrenocortical suppression than etomidate. One strategy seeks to reduce binding to 11β-hydroxylase, a critical enzyme in the steroid biosynthetic pathway, which is potently inhibited by etomidate. The other strategy seeks to reduce the duration of adrenocortical suppression after etomidate administration by modifying the drug's structure to render it susceptible to rapid metabolism by esterases. In this chapter, we describe the methods used to evaluate the hypnotic and adrenocortical inhibitory potencies of two lead compounds designed using the aforementioned strategies. Our purpose is to provide a case study for the development of novel analogs of existing drugs with reduced side effects.

Dimethoxy-etomidate: A Nonhypnotic Etomidate Analog that Potently Inhibits Steroidogenesis

Cushing's syndrome is characterized by the overproduction of adrenocortical steroids. Steroidogenesis inhibitors are mainstays of medical therapy for Cushing's syndrome; unfortunately, adverse side effects and treatment failures are common with currently available drugs. The general anesthetic induction agent etomidate is among the most potent inhibitors of adrenocortical steroidogenesis. However, its use as a treatment of Cushing's syndrome is complicated by its sedative-hypnotic activity and ability to produce myoclonus, central nervous system actions thought to be mediated by the GABA_A receptor. Here, we describe the pharmacology of the novel etomidate analog (R)-ethyl 1-(1-(3,5-dimethoxyphenyl)ethyl)-1H-imidazole-5-carboxylate (dimethoxy-etomidate). In contrast to etomidate, dimethoxy-etomidate minimally enhanced GABA-evoked GABA_A receptor-mediated currents even at a near-saturating aqueous concentration. In Sprague-Dawley rats, dimethoxy-etomidate's potency for producing loss of righting reflexes-an animal model of sedation/hypnosis-was 2 orders of magnitude lower than that of etomidate, and it did not produce myoclonus. However, similar to etomidate, dimethoxy-etomidate potently suppressed adrenocortical steroid synthesis primarily by inhibiting 11β-hydroxylase. [³H]etomidate binding to rat adrenocortical membranes was inhibited by dimethoxy-etomidate in a biphasic manner with IC₅₀ values of 8.2 and 3970 nM, whereas that by etomidate was monophasic with an IC₅₀ of 22 nM. Our results demonstrate that, similar to etomidate, dimethoxy-etomidate potently and dose-dependently suppresses adrenocortical steroid synthesis by inhibiting 11β-hydroxylase. However, it is essentially devoid of etomidate's GABA_A receptor positive modulatory and sedative-hypnotic activities and produces no myoclonus, providing proof of concept for the design of etomidate analogs without important central nervous system actions for the pharmacologic treatment of Cushing's syndrome.

Contrasting actions of a convulsant barbiturate and its anticonvulsant enantiomer on the α1 β3 γ2L GABAA receptor account for their in vivo effects

KEY POINTS

Most barbiturates are anaesthetics but unexpectedly a few are convulsants whose mechanism of action is poorly understood. We synthesized and characterized a novel pair of chiral barbiturates that are capable of photolabelling their binding sites on GABAA receptors. In mice the S-enantiomer is a convulsant, but the R-enantiomer is an anticonvulsant. The convulsant S-enantiomer binds solely at an inhibitory site. It is both an open state inhibitor and a resting state inhibitor. Its action is pH independent, suggesting the pyrimidine ring plays little part in binding. The inhibitory site is not enantioselective because the R-enantiomer inhibits with equal affinity. In contrast, only the anticonvulsant R-enantiomer binds to the enhancing site on open channels, causing them to stay open longer. The enhancing site is enantioselective. The in vivo actions of the convulsant S-enantiomer are accounted for by its interactions with GABAA receptors.

ABSTRACT

Most barbiturates are anaesthetics but a few unexpectedly are convulsants. We recently located the anaesthetic sites on GABAA receptors (GABAA Rs) by photolabelling with an anaesthetic barbiturate. To apply the same strategy to locate the convulsant sites requires the creation and mechanistic characterization of a suitable agent. We synthesized enantiomers of a novel, photoactivable barbiturate, 1-methyl-5-propyly-5-(m-trifluoromethyldiazirinyl) phenyl barbituric acid (mTFD-MPPB). In mice, S-mTFD-MPPB acted as a convulsant, whereas R-mTFD-MPPB acted as an anticonvulsant. Using patch clamp electrophysiology and fast solution exchange on recombinant human α1 β3 γ2L GABAA Rs expressed in HEK cells, we found that S-mTFD-MPPB inhibited GABA-induced currents, whereas R-mTFD-MPPB enhanced them. S-mTFD-MPPB caused inhibition by binding to either of two inhibitory sites on open channels with bimolecular kinetics. It also inhibited closed, resting state receptors at similar concentrations, decreasing the channel opening rate and shifting the GABA concentration-response curve to the right. R-mTFD-MPPB, like most anaesthetics, enhanced receptor gating by rapidly binding to allosteric sites on open channels, initiating a rate-limiting conformation change to stabilized open channel states. These states had slower closing rates, thus shifting the GABA concentration-response curve to the left. Under conditions when most GABAA Rs were open, an inhibitory action of R-mTFD-MPPB was revealed that had a similar IC50 to that of S-mTFD-MPPB. Thus, the inhibitory sites are not enantioselective, and the convulsant action of S-mTFD-MPPB results from its negligible affinity for the enhancing, anaesthetic sites. Interactions with these two classes of barbiturate binding sites on GABAA Rs underlie the enantiomers' different pharmacological activities in mice.

Distinct Hypnotic Recoveries After Infusions of Methoxycarbonyl Etomidate and Cyclopropyl Methoxycarbonyl Metomidate: The Role of the Metabolite

BACKGROUND

Methoxycarbonyl etomidate (MOC-etomidate) and cyclopropyl methoxycarbonyl metomidate (CPMM) are rapidly metabolized "soft" etomidate analogs. CPMM's duration of hypnotic effect is context insensitive, whereas MOC-etomidate's is not. In this study, we tested the hypothesis that CPMM's effect is context insensitive because, unlike MOC-etomidate, its metabolite fails to reach physiologically important concentrations in vivo even with prolonged continuous infusion.

METHODS

We compared the potencies with which MOC-etomidate and CPMM activate α1(L264T)β3γ2 γ-aminobutyric acid type A receptors and induce loss-of-righting reflexes (i.e., produce hypnosis) in tadpoles with those of their metabolites (MOC-etomidate's carboxylic acid metabolite [MOC-ECA] and CPMM's carboxylic acid metabolite [CPMM-CA], respectively). We measured metabolite concentrations in the blood and cerebrospinal fluid of Sprague-Dawley rats on CPMM infusion and compared them with those achieved with MOC-etomidate infusion. We measured the rates with which brain tissue from Sprague-Dawley rats metabolize MOC-etomidate and CPMM.

RESULTS

Both analogs and their metabolites enhanced γ-aminobutyric acid type A receptor function and induced loss-of-righting reflexes in a concentration-dependent manner. However, in these 2 assays, CPMM-CA's potency relative to its parent hypnotic was approximately 1:4900 and 1:1900, respectively, whereas MOC-ECA's was only approximately 1:415 and 1:390, respectively. With 2-hour CPMM infusions, CPMM-CA reached respective concentrations in the blood and cerebrospinal fluid that were 2 and >3 orders of magnitude lower than that which produced hypnosis. CPMM was metabolized by the brain tissue at a rate that is approximately 1/15th that of MOC-etomidate.

CONCLUSIONS

Hypnotic recovery after CPMM administration is context insensitive because its metabolite does not accumulate to hypnotic levels in the central nervous system. This reflects the very large potency ratio between CPMM and CPMM-CA and the resistance of CPMM to metabolism by esterases present in the brain.

Total Intravenous Anesthesia Using N-Methyl-D-Aspartate (NMDA) Receptor-Sparing Drugs in a Patient with Anti-NMDA Receptor Encephalitis

Anti-N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor encephalitis is a recently identified syndrome characterized by psychosis and dysautonomia. Treatment includes resection of the underlying tumor. While the pathologic mechanism involves disruption of NMDA function by anti-NMDA receptor autoantibodies, there are few descriptions of the perioperative management or anesthetic approach for such patients. We report a classic presentation of anti-NMDA receptor encephalitis and describe the use of total IV anesthesia with NMDA receptor-sparing drugs. Modest postoperative analgesic requirements, not reported in prior cases, are also described in our report.

The pharmacology of cyclopropyl-methoxycarbonyl metomidate: a comparison with propofol

BACKGROUND

Cyclopropyl-methoxycarbonyl metomidate (CPMM) is a "soft" etomidate analogue currently being developed as a propofol alternative for anesthetic induction and maintenance.

METHODS

We compared the potencies of CPMM and propofol by assessing their abilities to directly activate α1(L264T)β3γ2 gamma-aminobutyric acid type A (GABAA) receptors and induce loss of righting reflexes in tadpoles. We also measured the rates of encephalographic recovery in rats after CPMM and propofol infusions ranging in duration from 5 to 120 minutes.

RESULTS

CPMM and propofol activate GABAA receptors and induce loss of righting reflexes in tadpoles with respective 50% effective concentrations (EC50s) of 3.8 ± 0.4 and 3.9 ± 0.2 μM (GABAA receptor) and 2.6 ± 0.19 and 1.3 ± 0.04 μM (tadpole). Encephalographic recovery after prolonged infusion was faster with CPMM and lacked propofol's context sensitivity.

CONCLUSION

CPMM and propofol have similar potencies in GABAA receptors and tadpoles; however, CPMM provides more rapid and predictable recovery than propofol, particularly after prolonged infusion.

Anesthetic drug development: Novel drugs and new approaches

The ideal sedative–hypnotic drug would be a rapidly titratable intravenous agent with a high therapeutic index and minimal side effects. The current efforts to develop such agents are primarily focused on modifying the structures of existing drugs to improve their pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties. Drugs currently under development using this rational design approach include analogues of midazolam, propofol, and etomidate, such as remimazolam, PF0713, and cyclopropyl methoxycarbonyl-etomidate (MOC-etomidate), respectively. An alternative approach involves the rapid screening of large libraries of molecules for activity in structural or phenotypic assays that approximate anesthetic and target receptor interactions. Such high-throughput screening offers the potential for identifying completely novel classes of drugs. Anesthetic drug development is experiencing a resurgence of interest because there are new demands on our clinical practice that can be met, at least in part, with better agents. The goal of this review is to provide the reader with a glimpse of the novel anesthetic drugs and new developmental approaches that lie on the horizon.

Carboetomidate: an analog of etomidate that interacts weakly with 11β-hydroxylase

BACKGROUND

Carboetomidate is a pyrrole etomidate analog that is 3 orders of magnitude less potent an inhibitor of in vitro cortisol synthesis than etomidate (an imidazole) and does not inhibit in vivo steroid production. Although carboetomidate's reduced functional effect on steroid synthesis is thought to reflect lower binding affinity to 11β-hydroxylase, differential binding to this enzyme has never been experimentally demonstrated. In the current study, we tested the hypothesis that carboetomidate and etomidate bind with differential affinity to 11β-hydroxylase by comparing their abilities to inhibit photoaffinity labeling of purified enzyme by a photoactivatable etomidate analog and to modify the enzyme's absorption spectrum in a way that is indicative of ligand binding. In addition, we made a preliminary exploration of the manner in which etomidate and carboetomidate might differentially interact with this site using spectroscopic methods as well as molecular modeling techniques to better understand the structural basis for their selectivity.

METHODS

The ability of azi-etomidate to inhibit cortisol synthesis was tested by assessing its ability to inhibit cortisol synthesis by H295R cells. The binding affinities of etomidate and carboetomidate to 11β-hydroxylase were compared by assessing their abilities to (1) inhibit photoincorporation of the photolabile etomidate analog [(3)H]azi-etomidate into the enzyme and (2) modify the absorption spectrum of the enzyme's heme group. In silico docking studies of etomidate, carboetomidate, and azi-etomidate binding to 11β-hydroxylase were performed using the computer software GOLD.

RESULTS

Similar to etomidate, azi-etomidate potently inhibits in vitro cortisol synthesis. Etomidate inhibited [(3)H]azi-etomidate photolabeling of 11β-hydroxylase in a concentration-dependent manner. At a concentration of 40 µM, etomidate reduced photoincorporation of [(3)H]azi-etomidate by 96% ± 1% whereas carboetomidate had no experimentally detectable effect. On addition of etomidate to 11β-hydroxylase, a type 2 difference spectrum was produced indicative of etomidate complexation with the enzyme's heme iron; carboetomidate had no effect whereas azi-etomidate produced a reverse type 1 spectrum. Computer modeling studies predicted that etomidate, carboetomidate, and azi-etomidate can fit into the heme-containing pocket that forms 11β-hydroxylase's active site and pose with their carbonyl oxygens interacting with the heme iron and their phenyl rings stacking with phenylalanine-80. However, additional unique poses were identified for etomidate and azi-etomidate that likely account for their higher affinities.

CONCLUSIONS

Carboetomidate's reduced ability to suppress in vitro and in vivo steroid synthesis as compared with etomidate reflects its lower binding affinity to 11β-hydroxylase and may be attributed to carboetomidate's inability to form a coordination bond with the heme iron located at the enzyme's active site.

The pyrrole etomidate analog carboetomidate potently inhibits human 5-HT3A receptor function: comparisons with etomidate and potential implications for emetogenesis

BACKGROUND

5-Hydroxytryptamine type 3 (5-HT(3)) receptors are excitatory ion channels belonging to the cys-loop family of ligand-gated ion channels. They are involved in nausea and vomiting and their antagonists are used clinically as antiemetic drugs. We previously reported the development of a novel pyrrole analog of etomidate, (R)-ethyl 1-(1-phenylethyl)-1H-pyrrole-2-carboxylate (carboetomidate), which retains etomidate's desirable anesthetic and hemodynamic properties, but lacks its potent inhibitory effect on adrenocorticotropic hormone-stimulated steroid synthesis. Also in contrast to etomidate, carboetomidate potently inhibits nicotinic acetylcholine receptors. Because nicotinic acetylcholine and 5-HT(3) receptors are highly homologous, we hypothesized that carboetomidate might also potently inhibit 5-HT(3) receptors with potentially important implications for the drug's emetogenic activity. In the current studies, we investigated and compared modulation of 5-HT(3A) receptors by carboetomidate and etomidate.

METHODS

5-HT(3) receptors were heterologously expressed in human embryonic kidney cells. Drugs were applied with a multichannel superfusion pipette coupled to piezoelectric elements, and currents were recorded from cells in either the whole-cell or excised outside-out patch configuration of patch-clamp recordings.

RESULTS

Carboetomidate and etomidate inhibited integrated 5-HT(3A) receptor-mediated currents with respective half-inhibitory concentrations of 1.9 μM (95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.4-2.7 μM) and 25 μM (95% CI = 17-37 μM). These values may be compared with respective hypnotic concentrations of 5.4 and 2.3 µM. This inhibition reflected hypnotic effects on peak current amplitudes and desensitization rates. Half-inhibitory concentrations for reducing peak current amplitudes were 34 μM (95% CI = 24-48 µM) for carboetomidate and 171 μM (95% CI = 128-228 µM) for etomidate. Half-inhibitory concentrations for reducing the desensitization time constant were 3.5 μM (95% CI = 2.4-5.1 µM) for carboetomidate and 36 μM (95% CI = 21-59 µM) for etomidate.

CONCLUSIONS

In contrast to etomidate, carboetomidate inhibits 5-HT(3A) receptor-mediated currents at hypnotic concentrations. This inhibition is primarily the result of enhancing the rate of desensitization. Because carboetomidate potently inhibits 5-HT(3A) receptors, it may be less emetogenic than etomidate.

Adrenocortical suppression and recovery after continuous hypnotic infusion: etomidate versus its soft analogue cyclopropyl-methoxycarbonyl metomidate

Introduction

Etomidate is no longer administered as a continuous infusion for anesthetic maintenance or sedation, because it results in profound and persistent suppression of adrenocortical steroid synthesis with potentially lethal consequences in critically ill patients. We hypothesized that rapidly metabolized soft analogues of etomidate could be developed that do not produce persistent adrenocortical dysfunction even after prolonged continuous infusion. We hope that such agents might also provide more rapid and predictable anesthetic emergence. We have developed the soft etomidate analogue cyclopropyl-methoxycarbonyl etomidate (CPMM). Upon termination of 120-minute continuous infusions, hypnotic and encephalographic recoveries occur in four minutes. The aims of this study were to assess adrenocortical function during and following 120-minute continuous infusion of CPMM and to compare the results with those obtained using etomidate.

Methods

Dexamethasone-suppressed rats were randomized into an etomidate group, CPMM group, or control group. Rats in the etomidate and CPMM groups received 120-minute continuous infusions of etomidate and CPMM, respectively. Rats in the control group received neither hypnotic. In the first study, adrenocortical function during hypnotic infusion was assessed by administering adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) 90 minutes after the start of the hypnotic infusion and measuring plasma corticosterone concentrations at the end of the infusion 30 minutes later. In the second study, adrenocortical recovery following hypnotic infusion was assessed by administering ACTH every 30 minutes after infusion termination and measuring plasma corticosterone concentrations 30 minutes after each ACTH dose.

Results

During hypnotic infusion, ACTH-stimulated serum corticosterone concentrations were significantly lower in the CPMM and etomidate groups than in the control group (100 ± 64 ng/ml and 33 ± 32 ng/ml versus 615 ± 265 ng/ml, respectively). After hypnotic infusion, ACTH-stimulated serum corticosterone concentrations recovered to control values within 30 minutes in the CPMM group but remained suppressed relative to those in the control group for more than 3 hours in the etomidate group.

Conclusions

Both CPMM and etomidate suppress adrenocortical function during continuous infusion. However, recovery occurs significantly more rapidly following infusion of CPMM.

Azo-propofols: photochromic potentiators of GABA(A) receptors

Shine and rise! GABA(A) receptors are ligand-gated chloride ion channels that respond to γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA), which is the major inhibitory neurotransmitter of the mammalian central nervous system. Azobenzene derivatives of propofol, such as compound 1 (see scheme), increase GABA-induced currents in the dark form and lose this property upon light exposure and thus function as photochromic potentiators. Compound 1 can be employed as a light-dependent general anesthetic in translucent tadpoles.

Allyl m-trifluoromethyldiazirine mephobarbital: an unusually potent enantioselective and photoreactive barbiturate general anesthetic

We synthesized 5-allyl-1-methyl-5-(m-trifluoromethyl-diazirynylphenyl)barbituric acid (14), a trifluoromethyldiazirine-containing derivative of general anesthetic mephobarbital, separated the racemic mixture into enantiomers by chiral chromatography, and determined the configuration of the (+)-enantiomer as S by X-ray crystallography. Additionally, we obtained the (3)H-labeled ligand with high specific radioactivity. R-(-)-14 is an order of magnitude more potent than the most potent clinically used barbiturate, thiopental, and its general anesthetic EC(50) approaches those for propofol and etomidate, whereas S-(+)-14 is 10-fold less potent. Furthermore, at concentrations close to its anesthetic potency, R-(-)-14 both potentiated GABA-induced currents and increased the affinity for the agonist muscimol in human α1β2/3γ2L GABA(A) receptors. Finally, R-(-)-14 was found to be an exceptionally efficient photolabeling reagent, incorporating into both α1 and β3 subunits of human α1β3 GABA(A) receptors. These results indicate R-(-)-14 is a functional general anesthetic that is well-suited for identifying barbiturate binding sites on Cys-loop receptors.

Carboetomidate inhibits alpha4/beta2 neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptors at concentrations affecting animals

BACKGROUND

Carboetomidate is an etomidate derivative that produces hypnosis without inhibiting adrenal corticosteroid synthesis. Similar to etomidate, carboetomidate modulates γ-aminobutyric acid type A receptors, but its effects on other ion channel targets of general anesthetics are unknown.

METHODS

We compared etomidate and carboetomidate effects on human N-methyl-d-aspartate receptors or neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nnAChRs) expressed in Xenopus oocytes, using 2-microelectrode voltage clamp electrophysiology.

RESULTS

Etomidate did not affect either type of receptor at clinically relevant concentrations, whereas carboetomidate concentrations near 50% effective concentration for anesthesia significantly inhibited nnAChRs.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with etomidate, carboetomidate's higher hydrophobicity is associated with greater inhibition of nnAChRs.

p-(4-Azipentyl)propofol: a potent photoreactive general anesthetic derivative of propofol

We synthesized 2,6-diisopropyl-4-[3-(3-methyl-3H-diazirin-3-yl)propyl]phenol (p-(4-azipentyl)propofol), or p-4-AziC5-Pro, a novel photoactivable derivative of the general anesthetic propofol. p-4-AziC5-Pro has an anesthetic potency similar to that of propofol. Like propofol, the compound potentiates inhibitory GABA(A) receptor current responses and allosterically modulates binding to both agonist and benzodiazepine sites, assayed on heterologously expressed GABA(A) receptors. p-4-AziC5-Pro inhibits excitatory current responses of nACh receptors expressed in Xenopus oocytes and photoincorporates into native nACh receptor-enriched Torpedo membranes. Thus, p-4-AziC5-Pro is a functional general anesthetic that both modulates and photoincorporates into Cys-loop ligand-gated ion channels, making it an excellent candidate for use in identifying propofol binding sites.

Pharmacological studies of methoxycarbonyl etomidate's carboxylic acid metabolite

BACKGROUND

Methoxycarbonyl etomidate (MOC-etomidate) is a rapidly metabolized and ultrashort-acting etomidate analog that does not produce prolonged adrenocortical suppression after bolus administration. Its metabolite (MOC-ECA) is a carboxylic acid whose pharmacology is undefined. We hypothesized that MOC-ECA possesses significantly lower pharmacological activity than MOC-etomidate, accounting for the latter's very brief duration of hypnotic action and inability to produce prolonged adrenocortical suppression after bolus administration. To test this hypothesis, we compared the potencies of MOC-ECA and MOC-etomidate in 3 biological assays.

METHODS

The hypnotic potency of MOC-ECA was assessed in tadpoles using a loss-of-righting reflexes assay. The γ-aminobutyric acid type A (GABA(A)) receptor modulatory potencies of MOC-ECA and MOC-etomidate were compared by defining the concentrations of each required to directly activate α(1)(L264T)β(2)γ(2L) GABA(A) receptors. The adrenocortical inhibitory potencies of MOC-ECA and MOC-etomidate were compared by defining the concentrations of each required to inhibit in vitro cortisol production by adrenocortical cells.

RESULTS

MOC-ECA's 50% effective concentration for loss-of-righting reflexes in tadpoles was 2.8 ± 0.64 mM as compared with a previously reported value of 8 ± 2 μM for MOC-etomidate. The 50% effective concentrations for direct activation of GABA(A) receptors were 3.5 ± 0.63 mM for MOC-ECA versus 10 ± 2.5 μM for MOC-etomidate. The half-maximal inhibitory concentration for inhibiting in vitro cortisol production by adrenocortical cells was 30 ± 7 μM for MOC-ECA versus 0.10 ± 0.02 μM for MOC-etomidate.

CONCLUSIONS

In all 3 biological assays, MOC-ECA's potency was approximately 300-fold lower than that of MOC-etomidate.

In vivo and in vitro pharmacological studies of methoxycarbonyl-carboetomidate

BACKGROUND

We previously developed 2 etomidate analogs that retain etomidate's favorable hemodynamic properties but whose adrenocortical effects are reduced in duration or magnitude. Methoxycarbonyl (MOC)-etomidate is rapidly metabolized and ultrashort acting whereas (R)-ethyl 1-(1-phenylethyl)-1H-pyrrole-2-carboxylate (carboetomidate) does not potently inhibit 11β-hydroxylase. We hypothesized that MOC-etomidate's labile ester could be incorporated into carboetomidate to produce a new agent that possesses favorable properties individually found in each agent. We describe the synthesis and pharmacology of MOC-(R)-ethyl 1-(1-phenylethyl)-1H-pyrrole-2-carboxylate (MOC-carboetomidate), a "soft" analog of carboetomidate.

METHODS

MOC-carboetomidate's octanol:water partition coefficient was determined chromatographically and compared with those of etomidate, carboetomidate, and MOC-etomidate. MOC-carboetomidate's 50% effective concentration (EC(50)) and 50% effective dose for loss of righting reflexes (LORR) were measured in tadpoles and rats, respectively. Its effect on γ-aminobutyric acid A (GABA(A)) receptor function was assessed using 2-microelectrode voltage clamp electrophysiological techniques and its metabolic stability was determined in pooled rat blood using high performance liquid chromatography. Its duration of action and effects on arterial blood pressure and adrenocortical function were assessed in rats.

RESULTS

MOC-carboetomidate's octanol:water partition coefficient was 3300 ± 280, whereas those for etomidate, carboetomidate, and MOC-etomidate were 800 ± 180, 15,000 ± 3700, and 190 ± 25, respectively. MOC-carboetomidate's EC(50) for LORR in tadpoles was 9 ± 1 μM and its EC(50) for LORR in rats was 13 ± 5 mg/kg. At 13 μM, MOC-carboetomidate enhanced GABA(A) receptor currents by 400% ± 100%. Its metabolic half-life in pooled rat blood was 1.3 min. The slope of a plot of the duration of LORR in rats versus the logarithm of the hypnotic dose was significantly shallower for MOC-carboetomidate than for carboetomidate (4 ± 1 vs 15 ± 3, respectively; P = 0.0004123). At hypnotic doses, the effects of MOC-carboetomidate on arterial blood pressure and adrenocortical function were not significantly different from those of vehicle alone.

CONCLUSIONS

MOC-carboetomidate is a GABA(A) receptor modulator with potent hypnotic activity that is more rapidly metabolized and cleared from the brain than carboetomidate, maintains hemodynamic stability similar to carboetomidate, and does not suppress adrenocortical function.

p-Trifluoromethyldiazirinyl-etomidate: a potent photoreactive general anesthetic derivative of etomidate that is selective for ligand-gated cationic ion channels

We synthesized the R- and S-enantiomers of ethyl 1-(1-(4-(3-((trifluoromethyl)-3H-diazirin-3-yl)phenyl)ethyl)-1H-imidazole-5-carboxylate (trifluoromethyldiazirinyl-etomidate), or TFD-etomidate, a novel photoactivable derivative of the stereoselective general anesthetic etomidate (R-(2-ethyl 1-(phenylethyl)-1H-imidazole-5-carboxylate)). Anesthetic potency was similar to etomidate's, but stereoselectivity was reversed and attenuated. Relative to etomidate, TFD-etomidate was a more potent inhibitor of the excitatory receptors, nAChR (nicotinic acetylcholine receptor) ((alpha1)(2)beta1delta1gamma1) and 5-HT(3A)R (serotonin type 3A receptor), causing significant inhibition at anesthetic concentrations. S- but not R-TFD-etomidate enhanced currents elicited from inhibitory alpha1beta2gamma2L GABA(A)Rs by low concentrations of GABA, but with a lower efficacy than R-etomidate, and site-directed mutagenesis suggests they act at different sites. [(3)H]TFD-etomidate photolabeled the alpha-subunit of the nAChR in a manner allosterically regulated by agonists and noncompetitive inhibitors. TFD-etomidate's novel pharmacology is unlike that of etomidate derivatives with photoactivable groups in the ester position, which behave like etomidate, suggesting that it will further enhance our understanding of anesthetic mechanisms.

Inhibition of human alpha4beta2 neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptors by volatile aromatic anesthetics depends on drug hydrophobicity

BACKGROUND

Volatile aromatic compounds such as benzene are general anesthetics that cause amnesia, hypnosis, and immobility in response to noxious stimuli when inhaled. Although these compounds are not used clinically, they are frequently found in commercial items such as solvents and household cleaning products and are abused as inhalant drugs. Volatile aromatic anesthetics are useful pharmacological tools for probing the relationship between chemical structure and drug activity at putative general anesthetic targets. Neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine (nACh) receptors are ligand-gated ion channels widely expressed in the brain, which are thought to play important roles in learning and memory. In this study, we tested the hypothesis that aromatic anesthetics reversibly inhibit alpha(4)beta(2) neuronal nACh receptor function and sought to determine the structural correlates of receptor inhibition.

METHODS

Electrophysiological techniques were used to quantify the effects of 8 volatile aromatic anesthetics on currents elicited by 1 mM ACh and mediated by human alpha(4)beta(2) nACh receptors expressed in Xenopus oocytes.

RESULTS

All of the volatile aromatic anesthetics used in this study reversibly inhibited alpha(4)beta(2) nACh receptors with IC(50) values ranging from 0.00091 atm for 1,2-difluorobenzene to 0.045 atm for hexafluorobenzene. With the exception of hexafluorobenzene, all of the compounds had IC(50) values less than minimum alveolar concentration. Inhibitory potency correlated poorly with the cation-pi binding energies of the compounds (r(2) = 0.48, P = 0.059). However, there was a good correlation between inhibitory potency and the octanol/gas partition coefficient (r(2) = 0.87, P = 0.0008).

CONCLUSIONS

Volatile aromatic anesthetics potently and reversibly inhibit human alpha(4)beta(2) neuronal nACh receptors. This inhibition may play a role in producing amnesia. In contrast to N-methyl-d-aspartate receptors, the inhibitory potencies of aromatic anesthetics for alpha(4)beta(2) neuronal nACh receptors seem to be dependent on drug hydrophobicity rather than electrostatic properties. This implies that the volatile aromatic anesthetic binding site in the alpha(4)beta(2) neuronal nACh receptor is hydrophobic in character and differs from the nature of the binding site in N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors.

A comparison of the molecular bases for N-methyl-D-aspartate-receptor inhibition versus immobilizing activities of volatile aromatic anesthetics

BACKGROUND

Aromatic anesthetics exhibit a wide range of N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) receptor inhibitory potencies and immobilizing activities. We sought to characterize the molecular basis of NMDA receptor inhibition using comparative molecular field analysis (CoMFA), and compare the results to those from an equivalent model for immobilizing activity.

METHODS

Published potency data for 14 compounds were supplemented with new values for 2 additional agents. The anesthetics were divided into a training set (n = 12) used to formulate the activity models and a test set (n = 4) used to independently assess the models' predictive capability. The anesthetic structures were geometry optimized using ab initio quantum mechanics and aligned by field-fit minimization to provide the best correlation between the steric and electrostatic fields of the molecules and one or more lead structures. Orientations that yielded CoMFA models with the greatest predictive capability (assessed by leave-one-out cross-validation) were retained.

RESULTS

The final CoMFA model for the inhibition of NR1/NR2B NMDA receptors explained 99.3% of the variance in the observed activities of the 12 training set agents (F(2,)(9) = 661.5, P < 0.0001). The model effectively predicted inhibitory potency for the training set (cross-validated r(2)(CV) = 0.944) and 4 excluded test set compounds (predictive r(2)(Pred) = 0.966). The equivalent model for immobility in response to noxious stimuli explained 98.0% of the variance in the observed activities for the training set (F(2,)(9) = 219.2, P < 0.0001) and exhibited adequate predictive capability for both the training set (r(2)(CV) = 0.872) and test set (r(2)(Pred) = 0.926) agents. Comparison of pharmacophoric maps showed that several key steric and electrostatic regions were common to both activity models, but differences were observed in the relative importance of these key regions with respect to the two aspects of anesthetic activity.

CONCLUSIONS

The similarities in the pharmacophoric maps are consistent with NMDA receptors contributing part of the immobilizing activity of volatile aromatic anesthetics.

Is a new paradigm needed to explain how inhaled anesthetics produce immobility?

A paradox arises from present information concerning the mechanism(s) by which inhaled anesthetics produce immobility in the face of noxious stimulation. Several findings, such as additivity, suggest a common site at which inhaled anesthetics act to produce immobility. However, two decades of focused investigation have not identified a ligand- or voltage-gated channel that alone is sufficient to mediate immobility. Indeed, most putative targets provide minimal or no mediation. For example, opioid, 5-HT3, gamma-aminobutyric acid type A and glutamate receptors, and potassium and calcium channels appear to be irrelevant or play only minor roles. Furthermore, no combination of actions on ligand- or voltage-gated channels seems sufficient. A few plausible targets (e.g., sodium channels) merit further study, but there remains the possibility that immobilization results from a nonspecific mechanism.

Volatile aromatic anesthetics variably impact human gamma-aminobutyric acid type A receptor function

BACKGROUND

The gamma-aminobutyric acid type A (GABA(A)) and N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) receptors are important inhibitory and excitatory neurotransmitter receptors, respectively, in the central nervous system. At the concentrations required to produce immobility in the face of a noxious stimulus, volatile aromatic anesthetics inhibit NMDA receptors to varying degrees, strongly suggesting that they also act at other targets to produce immobilization. In this study, we sought to assess the potential role that GABA(A) receptors play in mediating the behavioral actions of volatile aromatic anesthetics.

METHODS

Electrophysiological techniques were used to quantify the effects of eight volatile aromatic anesthetics and three clinical anesthetics on currents mediated by alpha1beta2gamma2L GABA(A) receptors expressed in Xenopus oocytes.

RESULTS

At equivalent minimal alveolar anesthetic concentration multiples, volatile aromatic anesthetics vary widely in the degrees to which they enhance GABA(A) receptor-mediated currents elicited by low concentrations of GABA. In general, anesthetics that inhibit NMDA receptors most, enhanced GABA(A) receptors least. This reciprocal relationship between anesthetic potency on GABA(A) versus NMDA receptors was also observed for the clinical anesthetics isoflurane, halothane, and cyclopropane. Studies using a range of GABA concentrations indicated that volatile aromatic anesthetics enhance GABA(A) receptor activity by shifting the open-close (gating) equilibrium towards the open channel state.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest that GABA(A) receptors contribute variably to the behavioral actions of volatile anesthetics and imply that the molecular determinants of anesthetic action on NMDA and GABA(A) receptors are distinctly different.

Inhibition of human 5-HT(3A) and 5-HT(3AB) receptors by etomidate, propofol and pentobarbital

The actions of intravenous anaesthetics on 5-HT(3AB) receptors have not been studied. Using oocyte electrophysiology, the effects of etomidate, propofol, and pentobarbital on human 5-HT(3A) and 5-HT(3AB) receptors were studied and compared. Inhibition of peak currents by all three compounds in both receptor subtypes was anaesthetic concentration-dependant and non-competitive. Because the half-maximal inhibitory concentrations for etomidate, propofol and pentobarbital in 5-HT(3A) and 5-HT(3AB) receptors were all above their respective anaesthetic concentrations, the results of our study suggest that neither 5-HT(3) receptor subtype contributes to the anaesthetic actions of etomidate, propofol or pentobarbital.

Hexafluorobenzene acts in the spinal cord, whereas o-difluorobenzene acts in both brain and spinal cord, to produce immobility

BACKGROUND

Previous work demonstrated that isoflurane and halothane act on the spinal cord rather than on the brain to produce immobility in the face of noxious stimulation. These anesthetics share many effects on specific receptors, and thus do not test the broad applicability of the mediation of immobility by the cord. We sought to test such an applicability by determining whether the cord mediated the immobilizing effects of two aromatic anesthetics that differ greatly in their ability to block N-methyl-d-aspartate receptors.

METHODS

We investigated the actions of hexafluorobenzene (HFB) and o-difluorobenzene (ODFB) using an intact goat model that allowed selective delivery of anesthetics to the brain. Because our results suggested a significant cerebral effect of ODFB, in other goats we administered halothane 0.5% to the brain, while determining the ODFB concentration delivered to the body (the cord) required for immobility. We chose halothane because the present and previous studies found that cerebral halothane concentrations alone required for producing immobility far exceeded those required in the cord. We also applied the above techniques to another benzene-containing anesthetic, propofol.

RESULTS

Prebypass minimum alveolar concentration (MAC) for HFB was 0.82% +/- 0.14% (mean +/- sd); increased to 2.04% +/- 0.8% (P < 0.01) during selective delivery to the cranial circulation; and returned to 0.79% +/- 0.28% postbypass. Corresponding values for ODFB were 0.46% +/- 0.07%, 0.63% +/- 0.12% (P < 0.05), and 0.44% +/- 0.10%. ODFB MAC was 0.32% +/- 0.17% during selective halothane delivery to brain. But when ODFB was administered to the whole body, MAC was 0.37% +/- 0.05%, (NS). Like HFB, the halothane requirement increased threefold when delivered only to the head. In four of five animals, propofol requirements increased by 240%, but in one animal propofol requirements decreased, and the overall change was not statistically significant.

CONCLUSIONS

These data suggest that HFB, like halothane, produces immobility, predominantly by a spinal cord action, and that HFB differs from ODFB with respect to brain versus spinal sites of action. Nonetheless, although ODFB can produce immobility via a cerebral action, it also can do this via an independent action in the spinal cord. Thus, our results continue to support the spinal cord as the primary site at which inhaled anesthetics, and perhaps propofol, produce immobility.

Subunit-dependent modulation of the 5-hydroxytryptamine type 3 receptor open-close equilibrium by n-alcohols

5-Hydroxytryptamine (5-HT, serotonin) type 3 (5-HT(3)) receptors belong to the alcohol-sensitive superfamily of Cys-loop ligand-gated ion channels, and they are thought to play an important role in alcoholism. Alcohols with small molecular volumes increase the amplitude of currents evoked by low 5-HT concentrations and shift the 5-HT concentration-response curve for 5-HT(3) receptor activation leftward, indicative of increased receptor sensitivity to agonist. This action is significantly smaller when currents are mediated by heteromeric 5-HT(3AB) receptors compared with homomeric 5-HT(3A) receptors. In this study, we used the highly inefficacious 5-HT(3) receptor agonist dopamine to determine whether this difference between 5-HT(3A) and 5-HT(3AB) receptors reflects differential alcohol modulation of agonist binding affinity or channel gating efficacy. Human recombinant 5-HT(3A) and 5-HT(3AB) receptors were expressed in Xenopus oocytes, and currents were measured in the absence and presence of alcohols using the two-electrode voltage-clamp technique. Modulation by alcohols of peak currents elicited by maximally activating concentrations of dopamine was alcohol concentration-dependent. Potentiation by smaller alcohols was consistently significantly greater in 5-HT(3A) than in 5-HT(3AB) receptors, whereas inhibition by larger alcohols was not. A representative small (butanol) and large (octanol) alcohol failed to alter the EC(50) value for channel activation by dopamine. We conclude that the presence of the 5-HT(3B) subunit in 5-HT(3AB) receptors significantly reduces the enhancement of gating efficacy by small alcohols without altering the inhibitory actions of large alcohols.

Automated Documentation Error Detection and Notification Improves Anesthesia Billing Performance

Background

Documentation of key times and events is required to obtain reimbursement for anesthesia services. The authors installed an information management system to improve record keeping and billing performance but found that a significant number of their records still could not be billed in a timely manner, and some records were never billed at all because they contained documentation errors.

Methods

Computer software was developed that automatically examines electronic anesthetic records and alerts clinicians to documentation errors by alphanumeric page and e-mail. The software's efficacy was determined retrospectively by comparing billing performance before and after its implementation. Staff satisfaction with the software was assessed by survey.

Results

After implementation of this software, the percentage of anesthetic records that could never be billed declined from 1.31% to 0.04%, and the median time to correct documentation errors decreased from 33 days to 3 days. The average time to release an anesthetic record to the billing service decreased from 3.0+/-0.1 days to 1.1+/-0.2 days. More than 90% of staff found the system to be helpful and easier to use than the previous manual process for error detection and notification.

Conclusion

This system allowed the authors to reduce the median time to correct documentation errors and the number of anesthetic records that were never billed by at least an order of magnitude. The authors estimate that these improvements increased their department's revenue by approximately $400,000 per year.

Synthesis of trifluoromethylaryl diazirine and benzophenone derivatives of etomidate that are potent general anesthetics and effective photolabels for probing sites on ligand-gated ion channels

To locate the binding sites of general anesthetics on ligand-gated ion channels, two derivatives of the intravenous general anesthetic etomidate (2-ethyl 1-(phenylethyl)-1H-imidazole-5-carboxylate), in which the 2-ethyl group has been replaced by photoactivable groups based on either aryl diazirine or benzophenone chemistry, have been synthesized and characterized pharmacologically. TDBzl-etomidate (4-[3-(trifluoromethyl)-3H-diazirin-3-yl]benzyl 1-(1-phenylethyl)-1H-imidazole-5-carboxylate) and BzBzl-etomidate (4-benzoylbenzyl-1-(1-phenylethyl)-1H-imidazole-5-carboxylate are both potent general anesthetics with half-effective anesthetic concentrations of 700 and 220 nM, respectively. Both agents resembled etomidate in enhancing currents elicited by low concentrations of GABA on heterologously expressed GABAA receptors and in shifting the GABA concentration-response curve to lower concentrations. They also allosterically enhanced the binding of flunitrazepam to mammalian brain GABAA receptors. Both agents were also effective and selective photolabels, photoincorporating into some, but not all, subunits of the Torpedo nicotinic acetylcholine receptor to a degree that was allosterically regulated by an agonist or a noncompetitive inhibitor. Thus, they have the necessary pharmacological and photochemical properties to be useful in identifying the site of etomidate-induced anesthesia.

Do N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors mediate the capacity of inhaled anesthetics to suppress the temporal summation that contributes to minimum alveolar concentration?

Antagonism of N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) receptors markedly decreases the minimum alveolar concentration (MAC) of inhaled anesthetics. To assess the importance of suppression of the temporal summation NMDA receptor component of MAC, we stimulated the tail of rats with trains of electrical pulses of varying interstimulus intervals (ISIs) and determined the inhaled anesthetic concentrations (crossover concentrations) that suppressed movement at different ISIs. The slopes of crossover concentrations versus ISIs provided a measure of temporal summation for each anesthetic. We studied five anesthetics that differ widely in their in vitro capacity to block NMDA receptors. To block NMDA receptor transmission and reveal the NMDA receptor component, the NMDA receptor antagonist, MK801, was separately added during each anesthetic. Halothane, isoflurane, and hexafluorobenzene did not appreciably suppress the NMDA receptor components of temporal summation, which contributed to 21% to 29% of MAC (P < 0.05 for each). Xenon and o-difluorobenzene suppressed these components to 8% to 0%, respectively, of MAC (neither significant), consistent with their greater NMDA receptor blocking action in vitro. NMDA receptor blockade may contribute to the MAC produced by inhaled anesthetics that potently inhibit NMDA receptors in vitro but not those that have a limited in vitro effect.

Kinetics of anesthetic-induced conformational transitions in a four-alpha-helix bundle protein

Inhaled anesthetics are thought to alter the conformational states of Cys-loop ligand-gated ion channels (LGICs) by binding within discrete cavities that are lined by portions of four alpha-helical transmembrane domains. Because Cys-loop LGICs are complex molecules that are notoriously difficult to express and purify, scaled-down models have been used to better understand the basic molecular mechanisms of anesthetic action. In this study, stopped-flow fluorescence spectroscopy was used to define the kinetics with which inhaled anesthetics interact with (Aalpha(2)-L1M/L38M)(2), a four-alpha-helix bundle protein that was designed to model anesthetic binding sites on Cys-loop LGICs. Stopped-flow fluorescence traces obtained upon mixing (Aalpha(2)-L1M/L38M)(2) with halothane revealed immediate, fast, and slow components of quenching. The immediate component, which occurred within the mixing time of the spectrofluorimeter, was attributed to direct quenching of tryptophan fluorescence upon halothane binding to (Aalpha(2)-L1M/L38M)(2). This was followed by a biexponential fluorescence decay containing fast and slow components, reflecting anesthetic-induced conformational transitions. Fluorescence traces obtained in studies using sevoflurane, isoflurane, and desflurane, which poorly quench tryptophan fluorescence, did not contain the immediate component. However, these anesthetics did produce the fast and slow components, indicating that they also alter the conformation of (Aalpha(2)-L1M/L38M)(2). Cyclopropane, an anesthetic that acts with unusually low potency on Cys-loop LGICs, acted with low apparent potency on (Aalpha(2)-L1M/L38M)(2). These results suggest that four-alpha-helix bundle proteins may be useful models of in vivo sites of action that allow the use of a wide range of techniques to better understand how anesthetic binding leads to changes in protein structure and function.

Contrasting Roles of the N-Methyl-d-Aspartate Receptor in the Production of Immobilization by Conventional and Aromatic Anesthetics

We hypothesized that N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) receptors mediate some or all of the capacity of inhaled anesthetics to prevent movement in the face of noxious stimulation, and that this capacity to prevent movement correlates directly with the in vitro capacity of such anesthetics to block the NMDA receptor. To test this hypothesis, we measured the effect of IV infusion of the NMDA blockers dizocilpine (MK-801) and (R)-4-(3-phosphonopropyl) piperazine-2-carboxylic acid (CPP) to decrease the MAC (the minimum alveolar concentration of anesthetic that prevents movement in 50% of subjects given a noxious stimulation) of 8 conventional anesthetics (cyclopropane, desflurane, enflurane, halothane, isoflurane, nitrous oxide, sevoflurane, and xenon) and 8 aromatic compounds (benzene, fluorobenzene, o-difluorobenzene, p-difluorobenzene, 1,2,4-trifluorobenzene, 1,3,5-trifluorobenzene, pentafluorobenzene, and hexafluorobenzene) and, for comparison, etomidate. We postulated that MK-801 or CPP infusions would decrease MAC in inverse proportion to the in vitro capacity of these anesthetics to block the NMDA receptor. This notion proved correct for the aromatic inhaled anesthetics, but not for the conventional anesthetics. At the greatest infusion of MK-801 (32 microg x kg(-1) x min(-1)) the MACs of conventional anesthetics decreased by 59.4 +/- 3.4% (mean +/- sd) and at 8 microg x kg(-1) x min(-1) by 45.5 +/- 4.2%, a decrease not significantly different from a 51.4 +/- 19.0% decrease produced in the EC50 for etomidate, an anesthetic that acts solely by enhancing gamma-amino butyric acid (GABA) receptors. We conclude that some aromatic anesthetics may produce immobility in the face of noxious stimulation by blocking the action of glutamate on NMDA receptors but that conventional inhaled anesthetics do not.

Differential Modulation of Human N-Methyl-d-Aspartate Receptors by Structurally Diverse General Anesthetics

N-Methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) receptors have a presumed role in excitatory synaptic transmission and nociceptive pathways. Although previous studies have found that inhaled anesthetics inhibit NMDA receptor-mediated currents at clinically relevant concentrations, the use of different experimental protocols, receptor subtypes, and/or tissue sources confounds quantitative comparisons of the NMDA receptor inhibitory potencies of inhaled anesthetics. In the present study, we sought to fill this void by defining, using the two-electrode voltage-clamp technique, the extent to which diverse clinical and aromatic inhaled anesthetics inhibit the NR1/NR2B subtype of the human NMDA receptor expressed in Xenopus laevis oocytes. At 1 minimum alveolar anesthetic concentration (MAC), anesthetic compounds reversibly inhibited NMDA receptor currents by 12 +/- 6% to 74 +/- 6%. These results demonstrate that equianesthetic concentrations of inhaled anesthetics can differ considerably in the extent to which they inhibit NMDA receptors. Such differences may be useful for defining the role that this receptor plays in producing the in vivo actions of general anesthetics.

Anesthetic management for transurethral resection of the bladder in a 74-year-old man with uncorrected tetralogy of Fallot

We report a case of general anesthesia for transurethral resection of the bladder in a 74-year-old male patient with uncorrected tetralogy of Fallot. This case illustrates the pertinent pathophysiology of the complex cardiac lesion related to tetralogy of Fallot as well as the feasibility and issues with regard to the anesthetic management.

General Anesthetic-Induced Channel Gating Enhancement of 5-Hydroxytryptamine Type 3 Receptors Depends on Receptor Subunit Composition

5-Hydroxytryptamine (serotonin) (5-HT) type 3 (5-HT(3)) receptors are members of an anesthetic-sensitive superfamily of Cys-loop ligand-gated ion channels that can be formed as homomeric 5-HT(3A) or heteromeric 5-HT(3AB) receptors. When the efficacious agonist 5-HT is used, the inhaled anesthetics halothane and chloroform (at clinically relevant concentrations) significantly reduce the agonist EC(50) for 5-HT(3A) receptors but not for 5-HT(3AB) receptors. In the present study, we used dopamine (DA), a highly inefficacious agonist for 5-HT(3) receptors, to determine whether the difference in sensitivity between 5-HT(3A) and 5-HT(3AB) receptors to the potentiating effects of halothane and chloroform is due to differential modulation of agonist affinity, channel gating, or both. Using the two-electrode voltage-clamp technique with 5-HT(3A) and 5-HT(3AB) receptors expressed in Xenopus oocytes, we found that chloroform and halothane enhanced currents evoked by receptor-saturating concentrations of DA for both receptor subtypes in a concentration-dependent manner but that the magnitude of enhancement was substantially greater for 5-HT(3A) receptors than for 5-HT(3AB) receptors. Isoflurane induced only a small enhancement of currents evoked by receptor-saturating concentrations of DA for 5-HT(3A) receptors and no enhancement for 5-HT(3AB) receptors. For both receptor subtypes, none of the three test anesthetics significantly altered the agonist EC(50) for DA, implying that these anesthetics do not affect agonist binding affinity. Our results show that chloroform, halothane, and (to a much lesser degree) isoflurane enhance channel gating for 5-HT(3A) receptors and that the incorporation of 5-HT(3B) subunits to produce heteromeric 5-HT(3AB) receptors markedly attenuates the ability of these anesthetics to enhance channel gating.

Molecular properties important for inhaled anesthetic action on human 5-HT3A receptors

Although inhaled anesthetics have diverse effects on 5-hydroxytryptamine type 3 (5-HT3A) receptors, the mechanism accounting for this diversity is not understood. Studies have shown that modulation of 5-HT3A receptor currents by n-alcohols depends on molecular volume, suggesting that steric interactions between n-alcohols and their binding sites define their action on this receptor. Electrostatic interactions also play an important role in anesthetic action on other ligand-gated receptors. We aimed to determine the contribution of molecular volume and electrostatics in defining volatile anesthetic actions on 5-HT3A receptors. Human 5-HT3A receptors were expressed in, and recorded from, Xenopus oocytes using the two-electrode voltage-clamp technique. The effects of a range of volatile anesthetics, n-alcohols, and nonhalogenated alkanes on submaximal serotonin-evoked peak currents, and full serotonin concentration-response curves were defined. Volatile anesthetics and n-alcohols, but not alkanes, smaller than 0.120 nm3 enhanced submaximal serotonin-evoked peak currents whereas all larger agents reduced currents. Most compounds tested inhibited maximal serotonin-evoked peak currents to varying degrees. However, only agents smaller than 0.120 nm3 shifted the 5-HT3A receptor's serotonin concentration-response curve to the left, whereas larger anesthetics shifted them to the right. Modulation of human 5-HT3A-mediated currents by volatile anesthetics exhibits a dependence on molecular volume consistent with the n-alcohols, suggesting that both classes of agents may enhance 5-HT3A receptor function via the same mechanism. Furthermore, the enhancing but not inhibiting effects of anesthetic compounds on 5-HT3A receptor currents are modulated by electrostatic interactions.

Modulation of human 5-hydroxytryptamine type 3AB receptors by volatile anesthetics and n-alcohols

Functional 5-hydroxytryptamine type 3 (5-HT3) receptors can be formed by 5-HT3A subunits alone or in combination with the 5-HT3B subunit, but only the 5-HT3A receptor has been previously studied with respect to the modulation by volatile anesthetics and n-alcohols. Using two-electrode voltage-clamp, we show for the first time the modulation of heteromeric human (h)5-HT3AB receptors, expressed in Xenopus oocytes, by a series of n-alcohols and halogenated volatile anesthetics. At twice their anesthetic concentration, compounds having a molecular volume of less than 110 A3 enhanced submaximal 5-HT-evoked current. Compounds larger than 110 A3 inhibited submaximal 5-HT-evoked current. In experiments examining 5-HT concentration-response relationships, chloroform and butanol caused a slight decrease in the 5-HT EC50. Sevoflurane and octanol inhibited 5-HT-evoked current at all 5-HT concentrations tested but had no effect upon the 5-HT EC50. Compared with previous data on homomeric h5-HT3A receptors, the presence of the h5-HT3B subunit reduces the enhancement of h5-HT3 receptors by smaller halogenated volatile anesthetics and n-alcohols. In summary, these results suggest that heteromeric h5-HT3AB receptors are modulated by halogenated volatile anesthetics at clinically relevant concentrations, in addition to n-alcohols, suggesting that these receptors may be another physiological target for these compounds. The modulation is dependent upon the molecular volume of the compound, further supporting the concept of an anesthetic binding pocket of limited volume common on other Cys-loop ligand-gated ion channels. Incorporation of the 5-HT3B subunit alters either the anesthetic binding site or the allosteric interactions between anesthetic binding and channel opening.

Gamma-Aminobutyric AcidA Receptors Do Not Mediate the Immobility Produced by Isoflurane

Many inhaled anesthetics enhance the effect of the inhibitory neurotransmitter gamma aminobutyric acid (GABA), supporting the view that the GABAA receptor could mediate the capacity of inhaled anesthetics to produce immobility in the face of noxious stimulation (i.e., MAC, the minimum alveolar concentration required to suppress movement in response to a noxious stimulus in 50% of subjects). However, only limited in vivo data support the relevance of the GABAA receptor to MAC. In the present study we used two findings to test for the relevance of this receptor to immobilization for isoflurane: 1) differences among anesthetics in their capacity to enhance the response of receptor expression systems to GABA: isoflurane (considerable enhancement), xenon (minimal enhancement), and cyclopropane (minimal enhancement); and 2) studies showing that the spinal cord mediates MAC for isoflurane. If GABAA receptors mediate isoflurane MAC, then their blockade in the spinal cord should increase isoflurane MAC more than cyclopropane or xenon MAC and the MAC increase should be proportional to the in vitro enhancement of the GABAA receptor. To test this thesis, isoflurane, cyclopropane, or xenon MAC was determined in rats during intrathecal infusion of artificial cerebrospinal fluid (aCSF) via chronically implanted catheters. Then MAC was redetermined during infusion of 1 microL/min aCSF containing either 0.6 or 2.4 mg/mL picrotoxin, which noncompetitively blocks GABAA receptors. There was no consistent increase in MAC consequent to increasing the picrotoxin dose from 0.6 to 2.4 microg/min, which suggests that maximal blockade of GABAA receptors in the spinal cord had been achieved. Picrotoxin infusion increased MAC approximately 40% with all anesthetics. This indicates that GABA release in the spinal cord influences anesthetic requirement. However, the increase did not consistently differ among anesthetics and did not correlate with in vitro enhancement of GABAA receptors by these anesthetics. This supports the view that GABAA receptors do not mediate immobilization for isoflurane.

The N-Methyl-d-aspartate Receptor Inhibitory Potencies of Aromatic Inhaled Drugs of Abuse: Evidence for Modulation by Cation-π Interactions

Benzene and several close structural analogs are inhaled drugs of abuse with general anesthetic activity. By virtue of their pi electron clouds, they may engage in attractive electrostatic interactions with cationic atomic charges on protein targets. In this study, we tested the hypothesis that inhaled drugs of abuse inhibit human N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptors with potencies that correlate with their abilities to engage in cation-pi interactions. Electrophysiological techniques were used to define the NR1/NR2B NMDA receptor inhibitory concentrations of volatile benzene analogs, and computer modeling was used to quantify their abilities to engage in cation-pi interactions and their molecular volumes. In addition, each compound's octanol/gas partition coefficient (a measure of hydrophobicity) was quantified. All 18 compounds inhibited human NR1/NR2B NMDA receptors reversibly and in a concentration-dependent manner. NMDA receptor inhibitory potency correlated strongly with the ability to engage in cation-pi interactions, weakly with hydrophobicity, and was independent of molecular volume. This is consistent with the hypothesis that cation-pi interactions enhance the binding of inhaled drugs of abuse to the NMDA receptor and suggests that the receptor binding site(s) for these drugs possesses significant cationic character.

Inhaled anesthetics and immobility: mechanisms, mysteries, and minimum alveolar anesthetic concentration

Studies using molecular modeling, genetic engineering, neurophysiology/pharmacology, and whole animals have advanced our understanding of where and how inhaled anesthetics act to produce immobility (minimum alveolar anesthetic concentration; MAC) by actions on the spinal cord. Numerous ligand- and voltage-gated channels might plausibly mediate MAC, and specific amino acid sites in certain receptors present likely candidates for mediation. However, in vivo studies to date suggest that several channels or receptors may not be mediators (e.g., gamma-aminobutyric acid A, acetylcholine, potassium, 5-hydroxytryptamine-3, opioids, and alpha(2)-adrenergic), whereas other receptors/channels (e.g., glycine, N-methyl-D-aspartate, and sodium) remain credible candidates.

Modulation of GABA(A) receptor function by nonhalogenated alkane anesthetics: the effects on agonist enhancement, direct activation, and inhibition

At clinically relevant concentrations, ethers, alcohols, and halogenated alkanes enhance agonist action on the gamma-aminobutyric acid(A) (GABA(A)) receptor, whereas nonhalogenated alkanes do not. Many anesthetics also directly activate and/or inhibit GABA(A) receptors, actions that may produce important behavioral effects; although, the effects of nonhalogenated alkane anesthetics on GABA(A) receptor direct activation and inhibition have not been studied. In this study, we assessed the abilities of two representative nonhalogenated alkanes, cyclopropane and butane, to enhance agonist action, directly activate, and inhibit currents mediated by expressed alpha(1)beta(2)gamma(2L) GABA(A) receptors using electrophysiological techniques. Our studies reveal that cyclopro- pane and butane enhance agonist action on the GABA(A) receptor at concentrations that exceed those required to produce anesthesia. Neither nonhalogenated alkane directly activated nor inhibited GABA(A) receptors, even at concentrations that approach their aqueous saturated solubilities. These results strongly suggest that the behavioral actions of nonhalogenated alkane anesthetics do not result from their abilities to enhance agonist actions, directly activate, or inhibit alpha(1)beta(2)gamma(2L) GABA(A) receptors and are consistent with the hypothesis that electrostatic interactions between anesthetics and their protein binding sites modulate GABA(A) receptor potency.

IMPLICATIONS

When normalized to either their in vivo anesthetic potencies or hydrophobicities, cyclopropane and butane are 1-1.5 orders of magnitude less potent enhancers of agonist action on alpha(1beta2gamma2L) GABA(A) receptors than isoflurane. Additionally, cyclopropane and butane fail to directly activate or inhibit receptors, even at near aqueous saturating concentrations. Thus, it is unlikely that either enhancement or inhibition of the most common GABA(A) receptor subtype in the brain accounts for the behavioral activities of cyclopropane and butane.

Acetylcholine receptors and thresholds for convulsions from flurothyl and 1,2-dichlorohexafluorocyclobutane

There are acetylcholine receptors throughout the central nervous system, and they may mediate some forms and aspects of convulsive activity. Most high-affinity binding sites on nicotinic acetylcholine receptors for nicotine, cytisine, and epibatidine in the brain contain the beta2 subunit of the receptor. Transitional inhaled compounds (compounds less potent than predicted from their lipophilicity and the Meyer-Overton hypothesis) and nonimmobilizers (compounds that do not produce immobility despite a lipophilicity that suggests anesthetic qualities as predicted from the Meyer-Overton hypothesis) can produce convulsions. The nonimmobilizer flurothyl [di-(2,2,2,-trifluoroethyl)ether] blocks the action of gamma-aminobutyric acid on gamma-aminobutyric acid(A) receptors, whereas the nonimmobilizer 1,2-dichlorohexafluorocyclobutane (2N, also called F6) does not. 2N can block the action of acetylcholine on nicotinic acetylcholine receptors. We examined the relative capacities of these compounds to cause convulsions in mice having and lacking the beta2 subunit of the acetylcholine receptor. The partial pressure causing convulsions in half the mice (the 50% effective concentration [EC(50)]) was the same as in control mice. For the knockout mice, the EC(50) for flurothyl was 0.00170 +/- 0.00030 atm (mean +/- SD), and for 2N, it was 0.0345 +/- 0.0041 atm. For the control mice, the respective values were 0.00172 +/- 0.00057 atm and 0.0341 +/- 0.0048 atm. The ratio of the 2N to flurothyl EC(50) values was 20.8 +/- 3.5 for the knockout mice and 21.7 +/- 7.0 for the control mice. These results do not support the notion that acetylcholine receptors are important mediators of the capacity of 2N or flurothyl to cause convulsions. However, we also found that both nonimmobilizers inhibit rat alpha4beta2 neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptors at EC(50) partial pressures (0.00091 atm and 0.062 atm for flurothyl and 2N, respectively) that approximate those that produce convulsions (0.0015 atm and 0.04 atm).

IMPLICATIONS

The results from the present study provide conflicting data concerning the notion that acetylcholine receptors mediate the capacity of nonimmobilizers to produce convulsions.

Nonhalogenated anesthetic alkanes and perhalogenated nonimmobilizing alkanes inhibit alpha(4)beta(2) neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptors

The nonhalogenated anesthetic alkanes, cyclopropane and butane, do not enhance gamma-aminobutyric acid-elicited GABAergic currents, suggesting that these agents produce anesthesia via interactions with other molecular targets. Perhalogenated nonimmobilizing alkanes, such as 1,2-dichlorohexafluorocyclobutane and 2,3-dichlorooctafluorobutane, also fail to enhance GABAergic currents, but display specific behavioral effects that are distinct from those of structurally similar anesthetics. At concentrations predicted to be anesthetic, 1,2-dichlorohexafluorocyclobutane and 2,3-dichlorooctafluorobutane produce amnesia but fail to produce immobility. Neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine (nACh) receptors are sensitive to many anesthetics and are thought to have an important role in learning and memory. We postulated that neuronal nACh receptors might mediate the common amnestic action of nonhalogenated and perhalogenated alkanes. To test the hypothesis that neuronal nACh receptors have a role in mediating the behavioral effects of general anesthetics and nonimmobilizers, we quantified the inhibitory potencies of nonhalogenated anesthetic alkanes and perhalogenated nonimmobilizing alkanes on currents mediated by alpha(4)beta(2) neuronal nACh receptors. Our studies reveal that anesthetics and nonimmobilizers significantly inhibit alpha(4)beta(2) neuronal nACh receptors at concentrations that suppress learning and with potencies that correlate with their hydrophobicities. These results support the hypothesis that alpha(4)beta(2) neuronal nACh receptors mediate the amnestic actions of alkanes but not their immobilizing actions.

IMPLICATIONS

The results of this study suggest that the immobilizing actions of general anesthetics do not result from the inhibition of alpha(4beta2) neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptors. However, the inhibition of neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptors may account for the amnestic activities of general anesthetics and nonimmobilizers.