Green hospital pharmacy: A sustainable approach to the medication use process in a tertiary hospital

BACKGROUND

Sustainable management of healthcare waste has a positive impact on the global environment. In order to reduce it, the sustainable practice of the pharmacotherapeutic process in all its stages is essential.

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the sustainability strategies proposed by the pharmacy service to reduce drug waste derived from the pharmacotherapeutic process.

SECONDARY OBJECTIVES

to analyze the stage of the pharmacotherapeutic process and the number and type of drugs involved.

METHODS

The study was carried out in a tertiary level hospital. To coordinate the proposals, a referent pharmacist from every pharmacy department area was selected. Four stages of the process were evaluated (procurement, validation, dispensing and compounding), patients concerned were classified as outpatients or inpatients, and drugs potentially involved were analyzed by the administration route: into oral or parenteral.

RESULTS

28 ideas were proposed, which could affect more than 1200 drugs. 39.3% would affect the validation process, 17.9% the procurement management, 17.9% dispensing and 7.1% the compounding. Implementation feasibility and acceptability of these proposals were evaluated. Those with the greatest potential were: limiting the duration of treatments when possible, favoring the implementation of computer prescription order entry, favoring the use of the oral route over the parenteral route, and implementing computers in the preparation areas to avoid the use of paper guides.

DISCUSSION

In our study, many ideas have been proposed by hospital pharmacists to improve the sustainability of the medication use process. When assessing these proposals by impact and feasibility, according to our results, shorten as much as possible the duration of treatments, computerization of the medication use process and oral administration over intravenous should be prioritized in order to reduce environmental impact.

Abstract PD5-06: Prognostic value of molecular tumor infiltrating lymphocyte (mTIL) signatures in HER2-positive breast cancer patients in N9831 and FinHer/FinXX trials

Background: While previous study showed that the enrichment of immune-related gene expression was associated with outcome in HER2+ patients receiving sequential or concurrent trastuzumab (H), stromal tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (sTIL) have not been consistently shown to associate with outcome in this group of patients. Given that TIL scoring may be subjective, we analyzed molecular signatures of different subsets of tumor infiltrating immune cell populations, using NanoStringTM gene expression data to assess molecular TIL (mTIL) signature enrichment and intrinsic subtype as a function of relapse-free survival (RFS).

Methods: NanoStringTM technology was used to quantify mRNA in samples from 1,280 patients in N9831, 168 patients in FinHer, and 170 patients in FinXX. In N9831, patients in arm A were treated with chemotherapy alone (AC-T), arm B received chemotherapy followed by sequential H (AC-T-H), and arm C received H concurrently with chemotherapy (AC-TH). In the FinHer trial, H was given concurrently for 9 weeks and either 1 year or 9 weeks in FinXX trial. Cox proportional hazard ratio (HR) was used to determine the association of each gene signature with RFS. Different immune subset signatures, including CD45, B-cells, CD8 T-cells, cytotoxic-cells, and T-cells were analyzed using algorithms developed by NanoString.

Results: In N9831, CD45, cytotoxic-cell, and T-cell signatures were significantly associated with improved RFS in patients receiving chemotherapy alone and AC-T-H. However, none of the mTIL signatures were significantly associated with outcome in patients receiving AC-TH. Patients lacking CD45 enrichment had better outcome when H was given concurrently with chemotherapy. The 10-year Kaplan-Meier estimates for RFS in arm B patients with CD45 enrichment or no enrichment were 81.3% and 72.6%, respectively (HR 0.63 [95% CI, 0.42-0.93]; p = 0.02), and in arm C were 83.6% and 79.8%, respectively (HR 0.79, 95%CI 0.49-1.28; p = 0.34). Among patients with HER2-enriched subtype, all of the mTIL signatures were associated with improved RFS in arm A (AC-T) and B (AC-T-H) but remained non-significant in arm C (AC-TH). In patients with luminal subtypes, mTIL signatures were not significantly associated with outcome in patients treated with chemotherapy alone. Similar findings were observed in the FinHer and FinXX trials, in which, none of mTIL signatures were significantly associated with outcome among patients who received H.

Conclusion: This analysis sheds light on previous discrepancy between immune-related gene signature and sTIL findings. Our data also suggests that the poor prognosis associated with lack of infiltrating immune cells can be partly overcome by the concomitant administration of H with chemotherapy. mTIL signatures, specifically CD45, cytoxic, and T cells, were prognostically associated with improved outcome in patients receiving chemotherapy without concurrent trastuzumab. Understanding the role of the immune system in response to H will require a higher degree of granularity than can be achieved by histological quantification of TILs. Further studies are needed to validate the significance of mTIL signatures as predictive or prognostic biomarker in HER+ patients.

Citation Format: Chumsri S, Serie DJ, Mashadi-Hossein A, Tenner KS, Lauttia SL, Moreno-Aspitia A, McLaughlin SA, Nassar A, Warren S, Danaher P, Colon-Otero G, Lindman H, Joensuu H, Perez EA, Thompson EA. Prognostic value of molecular tumor infiltrating lymphocyte (mTIL) signatures in HER2-positive breast cancer patients in N9831 and FinHer/FinXX trials [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2016 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2016 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PD5-06.

SWOG S0800 (NCI CDR0000636131): addition of bevacizumab to neoadjuvant nab-paclitaxel with dose-dense doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide improves pathologic complete response (pCR) rates in inflammatory or locally advanced breast cancer

SWOG S0800, a randomized open-label Phase II clinical trial, compared the combination of weekly nab-paclitaxel and bevacizumab followed by dose-dense doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide (AC) with nab-paclitaxel followed or preceded by AC as neoadjuvant treatment for HER2-negative locally advanced breast cancer (LABC) or inflammatory breast cancer (IBC). Patients were randomly allocated (2:1:1) to three neoadjuvant chemotherapy arms: (1) nab-paclitaxel with concurrent bevacizumab followed by AC; (2) nab-paclitaxel followed by AC; or (3) AC followed by nab-paclitaxel. The primary endpoint was pathologic complete response (pCR) with stratification by disease type (non-IBC LABC vs. IBC) and hormone receptor status (positive vs. negative). Overall survival (OS), event-free survival (EFS), and toxicity were secondary endpoints. Analyses were intent-to-treat comparing bevacizumab to the combined control arms. A total of 215 patients were accrued including 11 % with IBC and 32 % with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). The addition of bevacizumab significantly increased the pCR rate overall (36 vs. 21 %; p = 0.019) and in TNBC (59 vs. 29 %; p = 0.014), but not in hormone receptor-positive disease (24 vs. 18 %; p = 0.41). Sequence of administration of nab-paclitaxel and AC did not affect the pCR rate. While no significant differences in OS or EFS were seen, a trend favored the addition of bevacizumab for EFS (p = 0.06) in TNBC. Overall, Grade 3-4 adverse events did not differ substantially by treatment arm. The addition of bevacizumab to nab-paclitaxel prior to dose-dense AC neoadjuvant chemotherapy significantly improved the pCR rate compared to chemotherapy alone in patients with triple-negative LABC/IBC and was accompanied by a trend for improved EFS. This suggests reconsideration of the role of bevacizumab in high-risk triple-negative locally advanced breast cancer.

Abstract P1-13-02: Early change in topoisomerase 1 (Top1) positive circulating tumor cells (CTCs) is associated with overall survival (OS) in patients with advanced breast cancer after treatment with etirinotecan pegol

Background: Etirinotecan pegol (EP) is a long-acting Top1 inhibitor providing sustained levels of active metabolite throughout the entire chemotherapy cycle. The phase 3 BEACON trial compared EP to treatment of physician's choice (TPC) in patients with advanced breast cancer, demonstrating a non-statistically significant 2.1 month difference in survival favoring EP in the intent to treat population. A novel aspect of the BEACON trial is to explore the utility of biomarkers measured in CTCs for predicting efficacy with EP. Pre- and post-treatment CTCs were isolated from blood of 77% of the 852 BEACON patients. Target-specific pharmacodynamic biomarkers for EP measured in CTCs were analyzed to identify patients most responsive to treatment with EP.

Methods: Donation of blood samples for CTC analysis was voluntary. Participating BEACON patients had serial (baseline, Cycle 2 Day 1 [C2D1], Cycle 4 Day 1 [C4D1], End of Treatment) 7.5-mL whole blood samples drawn in EDTA tubes and shipped within 96 hours ambient to ApoCell (Houston, TX) for processing. PBMCs were separated by Ficoll® gradient, and CTCs were isolated using ApoStream® technology. Isolated cells were deposited on three slides and stained for DAPI, CD45, cytokeratin markers, as well as Top1, Top2, Ki67, γH2AX, Rad51, ABCG2, and TUNEL. Biomarkers were quantified by iCys® laser scanning cytometer equipped with image analysis software, and correlated with OS using Cox multiple regression and Kaplan-Meier analyses.

Results: The CTC substudy yielded 611 pre-treatment, 519 C2D1, 268 C4D1, and 431 End of Treatment samples. Among the successfully processed blood samples, 98% had detectable CTCs, with a median of 63, 46, 51, and 57 CTCs/mL at baseline, C2D1, C4D1, and End of Treatment, respectively. Cox regression analyses of CTC number and percentage of Top1, Top2, Ki67, or TUNEL positive CTCs identified a correlation for post-treatment number of Top1-positive CTCs with OS in patients receiving EP. To assess the impact of Top1-positive CTCs, patients were classified as Top1-High (> median) or Top1-Low (≤ median) based on the percent of Top1-positive CTCs at baseline. Among the Top1-High patients at baseline, significantly improved OS (HR 0.54, p=0.007) was observed for those who converted to Top1-Low after their first treatment with EP (C2D1), but not TPC (HR 1.12, p=0.613). These results suggest that decreased number of Top1-positive CTCs may reflect EP target engagement with Top1, as these patients derived the most benefit from treatment.

Conclusions: CTC collection and analysis was successfully incorporated into the phase 3 BEACON study, with 77% patient participation. CTC detection rate using ApoStream® was high, permitting evaluation of biomarkers at baseline and post-treatment. Significantly improved OS was observed in patients who had a decreased number of Top1-positive CTCs following cycle 1 of EP.

Citation Format: Rugo HS, Cortes J, Awada A, O'Shaughnessy J, Twelves C, Im S-A, Hannah AL, Lu L, Sy S, Caygill K, Zajchowski D, Davis DW, Hoch U, Perez EA. Early change in topoisomerase 1 (Top1) positive circulating tumor cells (CTCs) is associated with overall survival (OS) in patients with advanced breast cancer after treatment with etirinotecan pegol. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2015 Dec 8-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-13-02.

Abstract P4-11-08: Impact of treatment on quality of life (QOL) in the BEACON study, a randomized phase III trial of etirinotecan pegol (EP) versus treatment of physician's choice (TPC) in patients (pts) with advanced breast cancer (aBC) whose disease has progressed following anthracycline (A), taxane (T) and capecitabine (C)

Background: The need remains for novel agents that prolong survival and/or improve QOL in women with aBC. EP is a long-acting topoisomerase 1 inhibitor engineered to produce sustained exposure to irinotecan and its active metabolite SN38. Given previous efficacy seen in an earlier phase II trial in MBC, EP 145 mg/m2 every 3 weeks was compared to TPC (one of 7 single-agent regimens) in the randomized phase 3 BEACON study (NCT01492101). As reported at ASCO 2015 (abstract 1001), EP prolonged median overall survival by 2.1 months, although this did not reach statistical significance (12.4 vs 10.3 months; HR 0.87, p=0.08). Grade ≥ 3 adverse events were significantly less common with EP (48% vs 63% with TPC, p<0.001). We now present results of the QOL analyses.

Methods: Patients completed validated health-related QoL (HRQoL) questionnaires, EORTC QLQ-C30 (version 3.0) and breast cancer-specific QLQ-BR23, pretreatment and every 8 weeks until progression, death or withdrawal of consent. Questionnaires were scored according to the EORTC manual. For each scale, raw scores were standardized via a linear transformation to a range from 0 to 100. Absolute scores and changes from baseline were analyzed longitudinally and categorically using a 5-point difference calculated by treatment group. Comparisons between treatment groups were conducted to evaluate the differences in global health status, functional scores and symptoms over time.

Results: The majority of patients who were randomized (total: 733/852 [86%], EP: 378/429 [88%], TPC: 355/423 [84%]) completed at least one post-baseline HRQoL questionnaire. In the EORTC QLQ-C30, grade ≥ 3 AEs significantly impacted HRQoL measured by global health status and 5 additional functional domains. Of the six domains, compared to TPC in a longitudinal analysis, EP was statistically superior in the mean treatment effect through Week 32 in global health status p=0.02 and physical functioning scale p=0.01. EP was also numerically superior in all other scales. In EORTC QLQ-C30 and BR-23, a total of 13 symptoms were measured and categorically analyzed. There were no treatment differences in 7 of 13 symptom scales. EP was associated with worsening of 3 symptom scales: appetite loss, nausea/vomiting, and diarrhea. TPC was associated with worsening of 2 symptom scales: dyspnea and systemic side effects.

Conclusions: In the phase 3 BEACON trial comparing EP to TPC, the more favorable toxicity profile of EP resulted in an improvement in global health status and physical function (results of the symptom scales confirmed the different toxicities of the two arms). EP remains a promising investigational therapy for aBC.

Citation Format: Cortes J, Awada A, Perez EA, Rugo HS, Twelves C, Im S-A, Zhao C, Hoch U, Ney J, Hannah AL, O'Shaughnessy J. Impact of treatment on quality of life (QOL) in the BEACON study, a randomized phase III trial of etirinotecan pegol (EP) versus treatment of physician's choice (TPC) in patients (pts) with advanced breast cancer (aBC) whose disease has progressed following anthracycline (A), taxane (T) and capecitabine (C). [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2015 Dec 8-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-11-08.

Abstract OT3-01-04: An open-label, single-arm, phase II study of pertuzumab with high-dose trastuzumab for the treatment of central nervous system progression post-radiotherapy in patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer (PATRICIA)

Background: Central nervous system (CNS) metastases are observed in up to half of patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC), with incidence likely to continue to rise due to longer survival through improved systemic treatments. While radiotherapy-based approaches can be effective, there are potential short- and long-term toxicities, and patients frequently progress. CNS response to existing systemic therapies has been generally poor, and there is a high unmet need with no approved treatment for CNS metastases in HER2-positive MBC. Combination of the HER2-targeted monoclonal antibodies trastuzumab and pertuzumab provides a more comprehensive blockade of HER2 than either antibody alone, and data from the phase III CLEOPATRA trial suggest that adding pertuzumab to trastuzumab and docetaxel may delay onset of CNS disease. Trastuzumab concentrations in the CNS are increased under conditions of an impaired blood–brain barrier (BBB) and subtherapeutic levels in the CNS may be related to insufficient dosing rather than inability to cross the BBB. The PATRICIA trial is evaluating the addition of pertuzumab with high-dose trastuzumab to a patient's current systemic treatment for HER2-positive MBC patients with CNS progression post-radiotherapy and stable systemic disease.

Study design: In this US-based, phase II, open-label, single-arm study, patients will receive intravenous pertuzumab (840 mg loading dose followed by 420 mg every 3 weeks) in combination with intravenous high-dose trastuzumab (6 mg/kg weekly) in addition to their current systemic therapy (except for ado-trastuzumab emtansine or lapatinib) until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.

Eligibility criteria: Patients aged ≥18 years with confirmed HER2-positive MBC with new and/or progressive CNS lesions >60 days after whole-brain radiotherapy or stereotactic radiosurgery for CNS metastases, performance status 0–1, and stable systemic disease will be eligible. Patients must have a baseline left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≥50%, no significant history of cardiac disease or current use of anthracyclines, life expectancy >12 weeks, and not be pregnant or lactating.

Aims: The primary efficacy endpoint will be objective response rate (ORR) in the CNS, assessed by the investigator using RANO–BM criteria. Secondary endpoints will include duration of CNS response, progression-free survival (CNS and/or non-CNS), overall survival, and safety. Pharmacokinetic and patient-reported outcomes will also be evaluated. LVEF will be assessed throughout treatment and follow-up. An interim analysis will be performed when 15 patients have completed 2 cycles, and the study will be stopped if no clinical benefit (complete response, partial response, or stable disease in the CNS) is seen or if two or more patients have congestive heart failure events related to trastuzumab or pertuzumab.

Statistical methods: The recruitment target is 40 patients; with 35 evaluable, the 95% confidence interval around an estimated ORR of 20% will be 8.4–36.9%. The trial opens for accrual in Q3 2015.

Citation Format: Lin NU, Pegram MD, Lai C, Lacasia A, Stein A, Yoo B, Perez EA. An open-label, single-arm, phase II study of pertuzumab with high-dose trastuzumab for the treatment of central nervous system progression post-radiotherapy in patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer (PATRICIA). [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2015 Dec 8-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(4 Suppl):Abstract nr OT3-01-04.

Abstract P3-07-04: Intrinsic subtype and therapeutic response among early stage HER2-positive breast tumors from the North Central cancer treatment group (Alliance) N9831 trial

Importance: 20-25% of patients with early stage HER2-positive breast cancer develop tumor relapse after adjuvant trastuzumab. Identification of such patients is a key goal for clinical management decisions.

Objective: To assess molecular heterogeneity among early stage HER2-positive patients using the Prosigna™ algorithm, to define intrinsic subtypes, and to determine the clinical significance of such heterogeneity.

Design: The NanoString® platform was used to measure the abundance of the PAM50 subtype signature transcripts. Samples from the NCCTG (Alliance) N9831 trial were analyzed using the Prosigna™ algorithm to define intrinsic subtype and risk scores. Subtypes were evaluated for recurrence-free survival following chemotherapy with or without trastuzumab.

Setting: Samples were obtained from a multi-center randomized phase III trial of chemotherapy versus chemotherapy plus trastuzumab.

Participants: All tumors were centrally evaluated for HER2 positivity, defined as IHC 3+ and/or FISH >2.0; 1392 patients were evaluated for molecular subtype.

Intervention(s): Patients received adjuvant chemotherapy (doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide followed by paclitaxel) (n=484) or chemotherapy plus trastuzumab (n=908).

Main Outcome Measure(s): The primary outcome was recurrence-free survival as a function of subtype and treatment.

Results: Patients with HER2-positive tumors with HER2-enriched features comprised about 70% of the sample cohort, and these individuals received significant benefit from adjuvant trastuzumab (HR=0.68, 95%CI: 0.52, 0.89, p=0.005), as did the relatively fewer patients (291/1392) with Luminal-type tumors (HR=0.52, 95%CI: 0.32, 0.85, p=0.01). The sample cohort contained a small number of patients with tumors having Basal-like features (97/1392), and the data suggest that these individuals may have received less benefit from trastuzumab, beyond that received from chemotherapy alone (HR=1.06, 95%CI:0.53,2.13, p=0.87).

Conclusions: The majority of HER2-positive tumors are classified as HER2-enriched or Luminal using the Prosigna algorithm, and patients with such tumors benefit from adjuvant trastuzumab. About 10% of HER2-positive tumors exhibit Basal-like genomic features, and such tumors appear to recur at fairly similar frequency irrespective of treatment with chemotherapy or chemotherapy plus trastuzumab. Patients with HER2-positive/Basal-like tumors may represent a cohort that should be considered for enrollment in trials to evaluate emerging novel HER2-targeted agents, other targeted therapies, or combinations of both approaches.

Support provided in part by CA129949 and CA15083.

Citation Format: Perez EA, Ballman KV, Mashadi-Hossein A, Tenner KS, Kachergus JM, Norton N, Necela BM, Carr JM, Ferree S, Perou CM, Cheang MCU, Thompson EA. Intrinsic subtype and therapeutic response among early stage HER2-positive breast tumors from the North Central cancer treatment group (Alliance) N9831 trial. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2015 Dec 8-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-07-04.

Abstract P2-04-02: Immunomodulatory effects of entinostat on PD-L1 and MHC class I and II in different subtypes of breast cancer

Background: Targeting immune checkpoint programmed death receptor 1 (PD-1)/PD-L1 pathway has shown promising clinical activity with some preliminary association of clinical benefit with PD-L1 expression on tumors. Recent preclinical and clinical studies highlight the beneficial immunomodulatory potential of epigenetic therapy. Entinostat is a class I specific histone deacetylase inhibitor (HDACi). A promising preclinical study showed that entinostat in combination with immune checkpoint blockade agent can eradicate modestly immunogenic breast tumors in mice via reduction in immunosuppressive myeloid-derived suppressor cells. In this study, we investigated the effects of entinostat on expression of immune-related genes in breast cancer cells to further explore the potential mechanism of its combined activity.

Method: Gene expression was assessed on Nanostring platform using the nCounter GX Human ImmunologyV2 panel comprised of 594 immune-related and 15 reference genes. Gene expression was normalized to the internal positive controls and reference genes using nSolver2.0 software. Hormone receptor-positive (HR+) breast cancer (MCF-7 and T47D) and triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) cell lines (MDA-MB-231 and Hs578T) were used for the analysis. Gene expression analysis was performed on control and after 24-hour treatment of entinostat at clinically relevant 125 and 500 nM concentrations.

Results: Overall, a greater number of immune-related genes were induced > 2 fold with entinostat at 125 and 500 nM in TNBC compared to HR+: 77 and 118 genes in MDA-MB-231, 80 and 147 genes in Hs578T, 20 and 64 genes in MCF-7, and 73 and 72 genes in T47D, respectively. In particular, MHC class I (HLA-A, HLA-B, HLA-C) and II (HLA-DMA, HLA-DMB, HLA-DOA, HLA-DOB, HLA-DPA1, HLA-DPB1, HLA-DQA1, HLA-DQA2, HLA-DQB1, HLA-DQB2, HLA-DRA, and HLA-DRB1) genes were induced by entinostat in a dose dependent manner (range 1.5-22.44 fold). These inductions were observed in both HR+ and TNBC cell lines. Interestingly, we found higher baseline expression and a several fold increase in PD-L1 expression in TNBC. PD-L1 mRNA expression increased by 1.74 and 2.14 fold in MDA-MB-231 and 3 and 9.6 fold in Hs578T with 125 and 500 nM treatment, respectively. Corresponding increase in PD-L1 protein expression after entinostat treatment was also observed. In contrast, there appeared to be no significant changes in PD-L1 expression after entinostat treatment in MCF-7 and T47D. Furthermore, we also identified 21 genes that were differentially induced by entinostat in TNBC but not in HR+. These genes include PTPN22, ARG2, CISH, IL17A, ICAM2, KIR3DL1, CXCR3, TLR2, CFD, CCR5, IL13, LILRA3, IL8, TNFRSF9, DPP4, MR1, SELPLG, PTGS2, IL1B, CD3D, and MBL2. No significant change in PDL2 expression was observed in any of the cell lines.

Conclusion: Our data suggest that entinostat induces immune-related genes involved in antigen presentation in both ER+ and TNBC cells, potentially increasing the immunogenicity of these tumors. Given the significant induction of PD-L1 expression with entinostat in TNBC, our preclinical data provides support for further investigation of entinostat in combination with anti-PD1 or anti-PD-L1 in this subtype of breast cancer.

Citation Format: Chumsri S, Necela BM, Ordentlich P, Advani P, Moreno-Aspitia A, McLaughlin SA, Geiger X, McDonough M, Vallow LA, Perez EA, Thompson EA. Immunomodulatory effects of entinostat on PD-L1 and MHC class I and II in different subtypes of breast cancer. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2015 Dec 8-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-04-02.

Study of correlation between forced vital capacity and demand for healthcare services in severe asthmatics

BACKGROUND

Involvement of the small airways may be related to increased severity and increased demand for health care services and incurring in high costs, private or for the healthcare system. The hyperinflation consequent to this involvement reduces lung volumes, such as FVC, FEV1 and SVC. The aim of this study was to evaluate the correlation between the predicted values of FVC, FEV1 and SVC with the demand for healthcare services by severe asthmatics.

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated in order of arrival, the medical records of 98 patients with severe asthma, in step 4 treatment in the intercritical period of the disease, correlating the number of times each patient sought health care services represented by admissions to the ER, ICU and hospital wards due to asthma, in the year before the last spirometry and the predicted values of FVC, FEV1 and SVC.

RESULTS

Our sample showed a clear and significant negative correlation between the predicted values of FVC, FEV1 and SVC and demand for healthcare services.

CONCLUSION

For this sample we conclude, that reduced forced vital capacity correlated with asthma severity, defined by greater demand for care in the ER, ICU and hospital ward and was more evident in women.

Endpoint comparison for bone mineral density measurements in North Central Cancer Treatment Group cancer clinical trials N02C1 and N03CC (Alliance)

Bone mineral density (BMD) measurement can vary depending upon anatomical site, machine, and normative values used. This analysis compared different BMD endpoints in two clinical trials. Trial results differed across endpoints. Future clinical trials should consider inclusion of multiple endpoints in sensitivity analysis to ensure sound overall study conclusions.

INTRODUCTION

Methodological issues hamper efficacy assessment of osteoporosis prevention agents in cancer survivors. Osteoporosis diagnosis can vary depending upon which bone mineral density (BMD) anatomical site and machine is used and which set of normative values are applied. This analysis compared different endpoints for osteoporosis treatment efficacy assessment in two clinical studies.

METHODS

Data from North Central Cancer Treatment Group phase III clinical trials N02C1 and N03CC (Alliance) were employed involving 774 patients each comparing two treatments for osteoporosis prevention. Endpoints for three anatomical sites included raw BMD score (RawBMD); raw machine-based, sample-standardized, and reference population-standardized T scores (RawT, TSamp, TRef); and standard normal percentile corresponding to the reference population-standardized T score (TPerc). For each, treatment arm comparison was carried out using three statistical tests using change and percentage change from baseline (CB, %CB) at 1 year.

RESULTS

Baseline correlations among endpoints ranged from 0.79 to 1.00. RawBMD and TPerc produced more statistically significant results (14 and 19 each out of 36 tests) compared to RawT (11/36), TSamp (8/36), and TRef (7/36). Spine produced the most statistically significant results (26/60) relative to femoral neck (20/60) and total hip (13/60). Lastly, CB resulted in 44 statistically significant results out of 90 tests, whereas %CB resulted in only 15 significant results.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment comparisons and interpretations were different across endpoints and anatomical sites. Transforming via sample statistics provided similar results as transforming via reference or machine-based norms. However, RawBMD and TPerc may be more sensitive to change as clinical trial endpoints.

The evaluation of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) in breast cancer: recommendations by an International TILs Working Group 2014

BACKGROUND

The morphological evaluation of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) in breast cancer (BC) is gaining momentum as evidence strengthens for the clinical relevance of this immunological biomarker. Accumulating evidence suggests that the extent of lymphocytic infiltration in tumor tissue can be assessed as a major parameter by evaluation of hematoxylin and eosin (H&E)-stained tumor sections. TILs have been shown to provide prognostic and potentially predictive value, particularly in triple-negative and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-overexpressing BC.

DESIGN

A standardized methodology for evaluating TILs is now needed as a prerequisite for integrating this parameter in standard histopathological practice, in a research setting as well as in clinical trials. This article reviews current data on the clinical validity and utility of TILs in BC in an effort to foster better knowledge and insight in this rapidly evolving field, and to develop a standardized methodology for visual assessment on H&E sections, acknowledging the future potential of molecular/multiplexed approaches.

CONCLUSIONS

The methodology provided is sufficiently detailed to offer a uniformly applied, pragmatic starting point and improve consistency and reproducibility in the measurement of TILs for future studies.

The evaluation of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) in breast cancer: recommendations by an International TILs Working Group 2014

BACKGROUND

The morphological evaluation of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) in breast cancer (BC) is gaining momentum as evidence strengthens for the clinical relevance of this immunological biomarker. Accumulating evidence suggests that the extent of lymphocytic infiltration in tumor tissue can be assessed as a major parameter by evaluation of hematoxylin and eosin (H&E)-stained tumor sections. TILs have been shown to provide prognostic and potentially predictive value, particularly in triple-negative and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-overexpressing BC.

DESIGN

A standardized methodology for evaluating TILs is now needed as a prerequisite for integrating this parameter in standard histopathological practice, in a research setting as well as in clinical trials. This article reviews current data on the clinical validity and utility of TILs in BC in an effort to foster better knowledge and insight in this rapidly evolving field, and to develop a standardized methodology for visual assessment on H&E sections, acknowledging the future potential of molecular/multiplexed approaches.

CONCLUSIONS

The methodology provided is sufficiently detailed to offer a uniformly applied, pragmatic starting point and improve consistency and reproducibility in the measurement of TILs for future studies.

Genetic variant predicts bevacizumab-induced hypertension in ECOG-5103 and ECOG-2100

BACKGROUND

Bevacizumab has broad anti-tumour activity, but substantial risk of hypertension. No reliable markers are available for predicting bevacizumab-induced hypertension.

METHODS

A genome-wide association study (GWAS) was performed in the phase III bevacizumab-based adjuvant breast cancer trial, ECOG-5103, to evaluate for an association between genotypes and hypertension. GWAS was conducted in those who had experienced systolic blood pressure (SBP) >160 mm Hg during therapy using binary analysis and a cumulative dose model for the total exposure of bevacizumab. Common toxicity criteria (CTC) grade 3-5 hypertension was also assessed. Candidate SNP validation was performed in the randomised phase III trial, ECOG-2100.

RESULTS

When using the phenotype of SBP>160 mm Hg, the most significant association in SV2C (rs6453204) approached and met genome-wide significance in the binary model (P=6.0 × 10(-8); OR=3.3) and in the cumulative dose model (P=4.7 × 10(-8); HR=2.2), respectively. Similar associations with rs6453204 were seen for CTC grade 3-5 hypertension but did not meet genome-wide significance. Validation study from ECOG-2100 demonstrated a statistically significant association between this SNP and grade 3/4 hypertension using the binary model (P-value=0.037; OR=2.4).

CONCLUSIONS

A genetic variant in SV2C predicted clinically relevant bevacizumab-induced hypertension in two independent, randomised phase III trials.

EGFR expression is associated with decreased benefit from trastuzumab in the NCCTG N9831 (Alliance) trial

BACKGROUND

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) has been hypothesised to modulate the effectiveness of anti-HER2 therapy. We used a standardised, quantitative immunofluorescence assay and a novel EGFR antibody to evaluate the correlation between EGFR expression and clinical outcome in the North Central Cancer Treatment Group (NCCTG) N9831 trial.

METHODS

Tissue microarrays were constructed that allowed analysis of 1365 patients randomly assigned to receive chemotherapy alone (Arm A), sequential trastuzumab after chemotherapy (Arm B) and chemotherapy with concurrent trastuzumab (Arm C). Measurement of EGFR was performed using the EGFR antibody, D38B1, on the fluorescence-based AQUA platform. The result was validated using an independent retrospective metastatic breast cancer cohort (n=130).

RESULTS

Epidermal growth factor receptor assessed as a continuous (logarithmic transformed) variable shows an association with disease-free survival in Arm C (P=0.009) but not in Arm A or B. High EGFR expression was associated with worse outcome (Hazard ratio (HR)=2.15; 95% CI 1.28-3.60, P=0.004). Validation in a Greek metastatic breast cancer cohort showed an HR associated with high EGFR expression of 1.92 (P=0.0073).

CONCLUSIONS

High expression of EGFR appears to be associated with decreased benefit from adjuvant concurrent trastuzumab. Since other treatment options exist for HER2-driven tumours, further validation of these data may select patients for alternative or additive therapy.

Abstract P2-16-23: The ENCHANT-1 trial (NCT01677455): An open label multicenter phase 2 proof of concept study evaluating first line ganetespib monotherapy in women with metastatic HER2 positive or triple negative breast cancer (TNBC)

Background: Hsp90 is a molecular chaperone protein required for the stabilization and activation of many proteins, referred to as Hsp90 ‘clients’, such as HER2, HIF1-a, EGFR, ER, PI3K, AKT, P53 and VEGFR. The drug candidate, ganetespib is a novel triazolone inhibitor of Hsp90, with over 700 patients treated to date. Ganetespib has shown activity in preclinical models of HER2+, ER+/PR+ and TNBC. Early clinical trials documented ganetespib single agent activity in heavily pretreated HER2+ and TNBC patients. Ganetespib has been well tolerated in clinical trials with a favorable safety profile. This efficacy-screening study is designed to provide further evidence of ganetespib activity and identify potentially predictive biomarkers in metastatic breast cancer (BC).

Methods: The ENCHANT-1 Trial is an international, first-line 2-cohort Phase 2 study in BC patients: Cohort A, HER2 amplified (n = 35), and Cohort B, TNBC (n = 35). Patients who present with previously untreated metastatic disease are eligible for treatment with ganetespib at 150 mg/m2 twice weekly on 3 out of 4 wks, for a total of up to 12 wks. Primary endpoint: ORR assessed using RECIST1.1 criteria. Key secondary endpoints include metabolic response as assessed by PET/CT at wk 3 utilizing modified EORTC criteria. Disease progression (PD) at wk 3 by PET imaging indicates discontinuation of study therapy, and is performed to quickly offer patients with metabolic PD a standard of care treatment.

The study is designed as Simon 2-stage requiring at least one OR in 15 patients for the respective cohort to expand to 35 patients. A Steering Committee is established to oversee the overall study and review the interim results.

Results: The study was initiated in 23 centers globally. At the time of submission, a total of 17 patients had been enrolled; TNBC (n = 15) and HER2 (n = 2). Here we report the interim analysis in the TNBC cohort. The median age was 54 years (range 30 -77) with ECOG PS 0 (n = 7/15). Most patients (n = 9) presented with de novo metastatic disease. 5 patients were not evaluable for PET assessment (3 had not yet reached wk 3 and 2 withdrawn before wk 3 for clinical progression), and 9 patients were not evaluable for objective response at wk 6 (3 withdrawn before or at wk 3 for clinical progression and 6 had not yet reached wk 6 evaluation). In the 10 patients with evaluable PET imaging, 9 patients achieved metabolic (m) response (2 mPR, 4 mSD with dominant tumor shrinkage and 3 SD) and one patient with mPD. In the 6 patients evaluable for OR at wk 6, one patient achieved PR, 2 SD and 3 PD. Treatment with ganetespib was well tolerated; the most common AEs were mild or moderate diarrhea (8/15, 53%), fatigue (5/15, 33%), decreased appetite (4/15, 27%), insomnia (4/15, 27%), and nausea (4/15, 27%).

Conclusion: Ganetespib single agent was generally well tolerated and showed anti-tumor activity TNBC patients as early as 3 weeks following treatment. PET seems to be a good tool to screen antitumor activity of new agents in early settings rather that in heavily pretreated patients. The TNBC cohort has met the protocol criteria for proceeding to stage 2.

Citation Information: Cancer Res 2013;73(24 Suppl): Abstract nr P2-16-23.

Abstract P3-13-04: Effect of age on tolerability and efficacy of eribulin and capecitabine in patients with metastatic breast cancer treated in study 301

Background:

The Phase III trial (NCT00337103) compared eribulin (E) with capecitabine (C) in patients (pts) with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) in the 1st-, 2nd-, and 3rd-line setting. Median overall survival (OS) was 15.9 and 14.5 months (HR 0.88; 95% CI 0.77, 1.00; P = 0.056) and median progression-free survival (PFS) was 4.1 and 4.2 months (HR 1.08; 95% CI 0.93, 1.25; P = 0.30) for E and C, respectively. This analysis compares toxicity and efficacy of E and C in relation to age.

Material and methods:

In this post-hoc exploratory analysis, the effect of age on the incidence of adverse events (AEs), OS, PFS, and objective response rate (ORR) with E and C were analyzed for two age groups: ≤65 years (E, n = 468; C, n = 491) and >65 years (E, n = 86; C, n = 57). For OS and PFS, analyses were stratified by HER2 and geographic region.

Results:

With increasing age, the proportion of pts with worse performance status (PS ≥1: 54.5% vs 69.2% for ≤65 and >65 years, respectively), ER+ (47.4% vs 57.3%), and PgR+ MBC (41.3% vs 45.5%) increased, and the proportion with triple-negative MBC decreased (26.6% vs 20.3%). With both treatments, AEs were reported in a higher proportion of pts in the older age group, this becoming more apparent for grade 3+ AEs (E: 64.6% vs 70.2%, and C: 45.0% vs 54.4% for ≤65 and >65 respectively). With E, there was a trend for increased incidence of grade 3/4 neutropenia (45.0% vs 50.0%) and leukopenia (13.7% vs 22.6%) but, in contrast, decreased peripheral sensory neuropathy (3.9% vs 1.2%) with increasing age. For C, there was a trend for increased palmar-plantar erythrodysethesia syndrome (total: 44.4% vs 50.9%; grade 3/4: 14.1% vs 17.5%), and grade 3/4 fatigue (1.8% vs 7.0%) and diarrhea (4.7% vs 10.5%) with increasing age; emesis and nausea were similar for both age groups. Dose adjustments due to AEs with E were slightly higher in the older age group: withdrawals 7.4% vs 10.7%; dose reductions 31.1% vs 36.9%; and dose delays 30.9% vs 36.9%. With C, there was a trend for an increased incidence of withdrawals (9.2% vs 21.1%) and dose delays (34.2% vs 49.1%) due to AEs with increasing age: the incidence of dose reductions was slightly higher in the older age group (31.3% vs 36.8%). In an unadjusted analysis, a trend for improved OS with E vs C was observed in both subgroups (≤65 years: median 15.8 vs 14.5 months; HR 0.90; 95% CI 0.78, 1.04; P = 0.16, and >65 years: median 18.4 vs 14.1 months; HR 0.74; 95% CI 0.50, 1.12; P = 0.16). PFS and ORR for E and C were: median PFS: E, 4.0 and 5.4 months; C, 4.2 and 5.9 months; ORR: E, 10.9% and 11.6%; C, 11.6% and 10.5%, in the ≤65 and >65 groups respectively.

Conclusions:

This exploratory and unadjusted analysis suggests a trend for improved OS with E in both younger and older pts with MBC. With both treatments there was a suggestion that AEs were reported in a higher proportion of pts in the older age group, this becoming more apparent for grade 3+ events. Specifically, these data suggest an increased incidence of grade 3/4 diarrhea, dose delays, and study withdrawal due to AEs in pts treated with C, and potentially suggest that with E there may be less difference between the AE profile in younger vs older pts than with C.

Citation Information: Cancer Res 2013;73(24 Suppl): Abstract nr P3-13-04.

Abstract P4-01-11: Limits of [18F]-FLT PET as a clinical biomarker of proliferation in breast cancer

Background:

Imaging biomarkers of cellular division offer promise as non-invasive measures of tumor response. 3’-deoxy-3’[18F]-fluorothymidine ([18F]-FLT) positron emission tomography (PET) imaging generally correlates with pathology-based measurements of cancer proliferation, especially the Ki67 score. Though clinical studies have associated changes in [18F]-FLT uptake with therapeutic response, clinical studies validating its ability to assess cell proliferation are comparatively lacking. The goal of this study was to determine quantitative relationships between [18F]-FLT compared with molecular and cellular metrics of proliferation during treatment for locally advanced breast cancer (LABC).

Methods:

Baseline [18F]−FLT-PET scans were obtained prior to the initiation of chemotherapy for LABC from patients enrolled at several academic oncology study sites. MRI scans, and transmission CT scans were obtained. Core needle biopsies were obtained to determine Ki-67 indices using immuno-histochemistry and to assess an mRNA signature based measurement of proliferation. Prospectively specified quantitative relationships between PET, Ki67 immunohistochemistry and the mRNA signature were evaluated using image-matched tumor specimens. Correlations between volumetric MRI changes and pathologic responses were evaluated in a post-hoc exploratory analysis.

Results:

Motivated by the hypothesis that effective chemotherapies should decrease tumor cell proliferation, FLT-PET was compared with biomarkers of proliferation including Ki67 and the mRNA signature during neoadjuvant treatment for LABC. [18F]-FLT correlated both with the Ki67 labeling index (SUVmean r = 0.53) and with the proliferation signature (SUVmean r = 0.7), validating the principle of thymidine analogue imaging. However, variability in the [18F]-FLT PET and tumor cell proliferation measures likely contributed to correlations less than pre-specified target values considered appropriate for clinical use (r > 0.78). Moreover, none of the proliferation biomarkers predicted pathologic complete responses at the end of neoadjuvant therapy ∼16 weeks after the 3 week response scan. In contrast, an evaluation of change in tumor volume measured by MRI after 3 weeks of therapy confirmed its superior ability to predict pCR and tumor re-staging.

Conclusion:

With large numbers of cancer drugs entering therapeutic pipelines, early efficacy measures remain critical for drug development. The 3-4 month neoadjuvant treatment paradigm for LABC offers unique opportunities for drug evaluation. Functional imaging using [18F]-FLT has been advanced as an assessor of cellular proliferation, potentially offering a non-invasive approach to response evaluation. While [18F]-FLT generally correlated with proliferation, its lack of association with patient responses likely limit its clinical utility. On the other hand, the predictive value of MRI offers unique opportunities for future trial designs and confirms previous reports (1).

1. N. M. Hylton et al., Locally advanced breast cancer: MR imaging for prediction of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Radiology 263, 663 (2012).

Citation Information: Cancer Res 2013;73(24 Suppl): Abstract nr P4-01-11.

Abstract P2-16-10: Safety of pertuzumab plus trastuzumab plus vinorelbine for first-line treatment of patients with HER2-positive locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer

Background: HER2 overexpression or amplification, occuring in ∼15-20% of breast cancers (BC), is associated with a poor prognosis. Trastuzumab (T) and pertuzumab (P) are humanized monoclonal antibodies that bind to different HER2 epitopes, inhibiting HER2 signaling. It was previously shown that first-line (1L) treatment of patients (pts) with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC) with vinorelbine (V)+T had similar efficacy to docetaxel+T, but with fewer adverse events (AEs) (HERNATA). In a recent study, P+T+docetaxel significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) compared with T+docetaxel in pts with HER2-positive 1L MBC (CLEOPATRA). The objective of the VELVET study is to investigate the efficacy and safety of P+T+V for 1L treatment of HER2-positive MBC.

Methods: This is a multicenter, open-label, single-arm, two-cohort, Phase II study. The recruitment target is 105 pts per cohort. Pts in Cohort 1 receive P+T+V as separate infusions. Pts in Cohort 2 receive P+T from a single infusion bag followed by V. The initial dose of P is 840 mg, followed by 420 mg q3w; the initial dose of T is 8 mg/kg, followed by 6 mg/kg q3w; V is administered at 25 mg/m2 in Cycle 1, followed by 30-35 mg/m2, on Days 1 and 8 of each cycle, q3w. Pts must have HER2-positive MBC or locally advanced BC (LABC) and a baseline left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of ≥55%. Previous treatment with systemic nonhormonal anticancer therapy in the metastatic setting is not allowed. The primary endpoint is independently assessed overall response rate. Secondary endpoints include PFS, OS, and safety.

Results: Interim safety data are presented for Cohort 1; 106 pts were enrolled. Median age at screening was 56 years. Median interval between initial BC diagnosis and enrollment was 2.6 years. 33% of pts had Stage IV BC at initial BC diagnosis. At diagnosis of advanced disease, 13% and 87% of pts had LABC and MBC, respectively. 54% of pts had previously received chemotherapy, including taxane (38%) and anthracycline (36%). 41% had prior T exposure. A median of 6 cycles of P, T, and V was received at the time of this analysis. An AE overview is shown in the table.

Pts, n(%)N = 106Any AE102(96)Grade 338(36)Grade 417(16)Grade 52(2)aAny serious AE25(24)Most frequent (≥4 pts) grade ≥3 AEs Neutropeniab21(20)Febrile neutropenia6(6)Leukopenia5(5)Asthenia4(4)Constipation4(4)Diarrhea4(4)a Myocardial infarction and septic shock; b Covers ‘neutropenia’ and ‘neutrophil count decreased’

Grade ≥3 neutropenia/febrile neutropenia was experienced by 8% of pts in Cycle 1 and by 14% of pts in Cycle 2; this proportion decreased during subsequent cycles. There was no overall decrease in mean LVEF from baseline.

Conclusions: The combination of P+T+V was well tolerated; no new safety signals were observed. The incidences of grade ≥3 neutropenia, febrile neutropenia, and leukopenia were lower than those previously observed in pts with HER2-positive MBC treated with 1L P+T+docetaxel in CLEOPATRA or those treated with T+V in HERNATA; however, it should be noted that the treatment period in these two studies was longer. Efficacy data for Cohorts 1 and 2 will be reported at the end of the study.

Citation Information: Cancer Res 2013;73(24 Suppl): Abstract nr P2-16-10.

N0539 phase II trial of fulvestrant and bevacizumab in patients with metastatic breast cancer previously treated with an aromatase inhibitor: a North Central Cancer Treatment Group (now Alliance) trial

BACKGROUND

Based on preclinical studies, the vascular endothelial pathway is an important mechanism for estrogen receptor resistance. We conducted a phase II study of fulvestrant and bevacizumab in patients with aromatase inhibitor pretreated metastatic breast cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A single-stage phase II study was conducted with these objectives: 6-month progression-free survival (PFS), tumor response, toxic effect, and overall survival. Regimen: 250 mg fulvestrant days 1 and 15 (cycle 1) then day 1 (cycle 2 and beyond) and 10 mg/kg bevacizumab days 1 and 15 of each 4-week cycle.

RESULTS

At interim analysis, 20 eligible patients initiated treatment, 11 were progression free and on treatment at 3 months, not meeting the protocol-specified efficacy requirements (at least 12 of 20). Accrual remained open during interim analysis with 36 patients enrolling before final study closure. Among the 33 eligible patients, the median PFS was 6.2 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 3.6-10.1 months]. Of the 18 with measurable disease, 4 (22%) patients (95% CI 6% to 48%) had a confirmed tumor response (1 complete, 3 partial). The most common grade 3/4 adverse events were hypertension 3 (9%) and headache 3 (9%).

CONCLUSIONS

The fulvestrant/bevacizumab combination is safe and tolerable; however, it did not meet its statistical end point.

Impact of premenopausal status at breast cancer diagnosis in women entered on the placebo-controlled NCIC CTG MA17 trial of extended adjuvant letrozole

BACKGROUND

MA17 showed improved outcomes in postmenopausal women given extended letrozole (LET) after completing 5 years of adjuvant tamoxifen.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Exploratory subgroup analyses of disease-free survival (DFS), distant DFS (DDFS), overall survival (OS), toxic effects and quality of life (QOL) in MA17 were performed based on menopausal status at breast cancer diagnosis.

RESULTS

At diagnosis, 877 women were premenopausal and 4289 were postmenopausal. Extended LET was significantly better than placebo (PLAC) in DFS for premenopausal [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.26, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.13-0.55; P = 0.0003] and postmenopausal women (HR = 0.67; 95% CI 0.51-0.89; P = 0.006), with greater DFS benefit in those premenopausal (interaction P = 0.03). In adjusted post-unblinding analysis, those who switched from PLAC to LET improved DDFS in premenopausal (HR = 0.15; 95% CI 0.03-0.79; P = 0.02) and postmenopausal women (HR = 0.45; 95% CI 0.22-0.94; P = 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

Extended LET after 5 years of tamoxifen was effective in pre- and postmenopausal women at diagnosis, and significantly better in those premenopausal. Women premenopausal at diagnosis should be considered for extended adjuvant therapy with LET if menopausal after completing tamoxifen.

Abstract P1-12-06: N0937 (Alliance): Preliminary results of a phase II clinical trial of cisplatin and the novel agent brostallicin in patients with metastatic triple negative breast cancer (mTNBC)

Background: TNBC is characterized by unique molecular profiles, aggressive behavior, poor prognosis and lack of targeted therapies. Brostallicin is a novel synthetic compound from the class of DNA minor groove binding (MGB) anti-cancer agents, making it a logical agent to evaluate in the setting of TNBC. It retains activity in cancer cells resistant to alkylating agents, topoisomerase I inhibitors and is fully active against DNA-mismatch repair deficient tumor cells. Preclinical models using cell lines demonstrate that cells expressing relatively high glutathione/glutathione S-transferase (GSH/GST) levels are more susceptible to brostallicin's antitumor efficacy. Cisplatin administration increases expression of GSH/GST in tumor cells, thus leading to an increased anti-tumor efficacy of brostallicin.

Methods: Phase II cooperative group study in pts with mTNBC (³18 years of age with measurable metastatic disease, ER/PR ≤1%; HER2 negative, who had received 0–4 prior chemotherapy regimens in the metastatic setting; with adequate hematologic, renal and hepatic functions; and no active CNS metastases; prior exposure to cisplatin allowed). Cisplatin on Day 1 followed by brostallicin on Day 2, repeated every 21 days. Aim: efficacy of brostallicin and proof of concept of its mechanism of action in mTNBC. Primary endpoint progression-free survival (PFS) at 3 months with 89% power (0.10 significance level) to detect an absolute difference of 20% (35% vs 55%), based on the median PFS of 60 days in pts with mTNBC from the N0234 trial of erlotinib and gemcitabine as 1st/2nd line. Secondary endpoints include ORR, duration of response (DOR), 6-month PFS, OS and AE profile. Tertiary endpoints include assessment of 1) GSH levels prior to the administration of cisplatin and of brostallicin; and 2) the prevalence of BCRA-1 mutation by IHC in primary or metastatic tumor.

Results: Study closed on 3/28/12 and it accrued 48 pts (median f/u 2.3 mo; 0–15.3); 33 pts are off treatment and 15 pts remain on study; 38 pts evaluable for response, and 43 evaluable for AEs. 50% received therapy as 3rd to 5th line. Median number of cycles 2.5 (off-treatment: 2; on-treatment: 3, range 0–15). There are currently 5 confirmed responses (4 PR and 1 CR); DOR: 2.8–13.3 months. The 6-mo PFS is currently 19.2% (95% CI: 8.9%, 41.3%); the median TTP is 3.0 months (95% CI: 1.7 months, 4.2 months). Current data are premature to determine the primary endpoint (3-mo PFS) but we expect to report such data by November 2012. Current toxicity data: 69.7% G3/4 heme toxicity. Non-heme toxicity G3 (30.2%) and G4 (9.3)% (febrile neutropenia 21%; fatigue G3 14%); and no G5 non-heme AE.

Conclusions: The current preliminary data of this trial show very encouraging activity of this regimen (brostallicin plus cisplatin) in mTNBC. Near 1/3 of pts are still currently receiving therapy, and we expect to provide primary and additional secondary endpoint data at SABCS 2012.

Citation Information: Cancer Res 2012;72(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-12-06.

Abstract P1-05-24: Pharmacologic reversion of epigenetic silencing of the PRKD1 promoter blocks breast tumor cell invasion and metastasis

Epigenetic silencing of tumor suppressing genes by promoter-specific DNA methylation is common in many types of cancer. As an early event, this process has been well shown to promote tumor initiation and progression; however little is known how such epigenetic silencing can contribute to tumor metastasis. The PRKD1 gene encodes Protein Kinase D1 (PKD1), a serine/threonine kinase expressed in epithelial cells of the normal mammary gland that maintains the epithelial phenotype of normal breast cells and prevents epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT). PKD1 is also a critical suppressor of tumor cell invasion and is silenced in expression and activity during breast tumor progression. Here, we show that aberrant methylation of PRKD1 promoter region is not only correlated with the silencing of its expression but is also associated with invasiveness of breast cancer cell lines and with aggressiveness of breast tumors. Using the highly invasive MDA-MB-231 cells, we show that the inhibition of PRKD1 promoter methylation with the DNA methyltransferase inhibitor decitabine restores PKD1 expression and significantly decreases their invasive abilities in vitro. More importantly, in a tumor xenograft model it dramatically blocks tumor spread and metastasis to the lung in a PKD1-dependent fashion. Our data suggest that the status of epigenetic regulation of the PRKD1 promoter can provide valid information on the invasiveness of breast tumors, and therefore could serve as an early diagnostic marker. Moreover, targeted upregulation of PKD1 expression may be used as a therapeutic approach to reverse the invasive phenotype of breast cancer cells.

Citation Information: Cancer Res 2012;72(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-05-24.

PD05-03: Impact of Quantitative Measurement of HER2, HER3, HER4, EGFR, ER and PTEN Protein Expression on Benefit to Adjuvant Trastuzumab in Early-Stage HER2+ Breast Cancer Patients in NCCTG N9831

Background: Prediction of benefit from trastuzumab in patients (pts) with HER2+ breast cancer remains an important goal. We sought to investigate the predictive value of quantitative measurement of HER2, HER3, HER4, EGFR, ER and PTEN protein expression on the benefit of trastuzumab in the phase III HER2+ adjuvant N9831 study for pts randomized to chemotherapy alone (Arm A) or chemotherapy with sequential (Arm B) or concurrent trastuzumab (Arm C).

Methods: For each marker, we evaluated quantitative expression, relationship with demographic data, and association with disease-free survival (DFS) of pts. Freshly cut tissue microarray slides with up to three-fold redundancy per specimen from the N9831 cohort were treated identically using the AQUA (Camp, et al; Nat Med 2002, JCO 2008) method of quantitative immunofluorescence for each marker. HER2 was tested with CB11 (mouse monoclonal, Biocare, Inc.) and preliminary results were available for 698 of nearly 1400 pt specimens to be tested. The minimum value per pt was used in statistical analysis. Specimens were classified with high versus low expression based on a median value cutpoint for each marker. Median follow-up was 7.0 yrs.

Results: Quantitative HER2 was compared with centrally performed HER2 testing by IHC and FISH. Median quantitative HER2 via AQUA was 10,017 units for the HER2 IHC 3+ group (n=607) versus 1058, 831, and 970 for the HER2 IHC 2+ (n=68), 1+ (n=11), and 0 (n=11) groups, respectively. The Spearman correlation between quantitative HER2 and FISH HER2/CEP17 ratio was 0.32 (p<0.001). High quantitative HER2 was associated with lower percentage of hormone receptor positivity (48% vs 59%, chi-sq p=0.003) but not associated with age, race, nodal positivity, tumor histology, grade, or size. High HER2 did not impact DFS in any arm of the study (See Table). Data for additional HER2 testing, HER3, HER4, EGFR, ER and PTEN are in process and will be ready by September, 2011.

Conclusions: Similar to results based on standard HER2 testing by IHC and FISH in N9831, quantitative HER2 did not impact benefit from adjuvant trastuzumab. Results for additional markers will be presented. Our complete quantitative results for a second epitope on HER2, HER3, HER4, ER and EGFR will be the first report of these markers in a large patient cohort in the adjuvant setting.

Disease Free Survival

P1-12-13: Comparative Pharmacokinetics (PK) of Trastuzumab Emtansine (T-DM1) in Patients Who Have or Who Have Not Received Prior Treatment for Human Epidermal Growth Factor 2 (HER2)-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer (MBC)

Background: T-DM1, an antibody-drug conjugate composed of trastuzumab, a stable linker, and the cytotoxic agent DM1, is in development for the treatment of HER2−positive cancers. Single-agent T-DM1 3.6 mg/kg every 3 weeks (q3w) has demonstrated clinical activity in 2 phase II studies (TDM4258g and TDM4374g) in patients with pretreated HER2−positive MBC. The efficacy and safety of T-DM1 vs trastuzumab + docetaxel was investigated in patients with no prior MBC treatment in the randomized phase II study TDM4450g/BO21976. Here we report the PK of T-DM1 from that study and compare these data with those from studies that enrolled pretreated patients.

Methods: In all 3 studies, PK parameters, including maximum concentration (Cmax), area under the concentration-time curve (AUC), terminal half-life (t½), steady-state volume of distribution (Vss), and clearance (CL) were estimated by noncompartmental analysis (NCA) for serum T-DM1, serum total trastuzumab (conjugated and unconjugated), and plasma DM1. The effects of baseline trastuzumab and HER2 extracellular domain (ECD) concentration on T-DM1 exposure were explored and the relationship between T-DM1 exposure and clinical response (objective response rate [ORR] and progression-free survival [PFS]) was modeled.

Results: T-DM1 PK from evaluable patients enrolled in 3 studies are shown in Table 1. No significant correlations were observed between efficacy (as measured by ORR) and T-DM1 exposure (AUC, Cmax) after administration of T-DM1 to pretreated patients; efficacy-exposure analyses (ORR and PFS) for previously untreated patients will be presented. Patients with measurable concentrations of trastuzumab at baseline had a greater AUC during cycle 1; however, this did not impact ORR. Baseline circulating HER2 ECD concentrations also had no effect on ORR for pretreated patients. The impact of baseline trastuzumab and HER2 ECD concentrations on ORR and PFS in previously untreated patients will be presented.

PD05-04: Quantitative Measurement of Antigen Degradation in NCCTG N9831 Tissue Microarrays

Background: Unstained recuts from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissues are commonly collected for cooperative group studies. There is concern among pathologists that improper storage conditions can lead to antigen degradation. In an effort to quantify this effect, we compared the expression of HER1 and HER2 on two sets of identical cohort tissue microarrays (TMAs) from the N9831 HER2+ adjuvant phase III trial (NCT00005970; www.clinicaltrials.gov); one freshly cut set (cut April 18, 2011) and a second set stored at 4 degrees for over two years (cut between Nov, 2007 and Jan, 2008).

Methods: The two sets of TMA slides containing 1580 tumor samples from the N9831 cohort were treated identically using the AQUA method of quantitative immunofluorescence. HER1 was tested with D38B1 (rabbit monoclonal, Cell Signaling Technology, Inc.) and HER2 with CB11 (mouse monoclonal, Biocare, Inc.) on tumors from 695 patients (712 specimens) in the fresh TMAs and 779 patients (800 specimens) in the old TMAs in up to three-fold redundancy per specimen.

Results: Frequency distributions of the expression of HER2 revealed bimodality in the fresh TMAs compared to an attenuated distribution of the old cases. The average score of the entire cohort was significantly lower in old TMAs compared to fresh cuts (paired t-test, p<0.0001). Linear regression of the average HER2 scores from new TMAs versus the average scores from old TMAs showed a slope term of 0.52, which is statistically significantly different from the hypothetical value of 1 (p<0.0001). Regressions between any two fresh slides showed slopes close to 1.0. Similar results were seen for HER1, but fewer positive cases made the changes less dramatic.

Conclusions: The storage condition of tissue slides is a critical pre-analytical variable that can dramatically lower the score of HER1 and HER2, artificially. Thus, studies done on inadequately stored slides, either whole sections or TMAs, must be interpreted with caution. Tissue collection and analysis of biomarkers for cooperative group studies should not include unstained recuts, but rather, entire blocks or large cores from tissue blocks.

Citation Information: Cancer Res 2011;71(24 Suppl):Abstract nr PD05-04.

P2-12-02: Correlation between BMI and Clinical Outcome of Patients with Early Stage HER2+ Breast Cancer from the N9831 Clinical Trial

Background

Obesity, as defined by body mass index (BMI), has been associated with increased recurrence rate, shorter DFS and increased death rates due to breast cancer (BC). Most of the studies to date have examined the relationship of BMI and DFS in patients with hormone receptor positive disease. To our knowledge, BMI and its relationship with outcome in early stage HER2 positive breast cancer has not previously been examined. The N9831 is a large phase III trial testing the role of trastuzumab in the adjuvant setting of high risk patients with early stage HER2+ BC. We hypothesized that the occurrence of overweight and obesity may correlate with outcome.

Methods: This analysis presents BMI and its relation to tumor characteristics and DFS in patients (pts) enrolled in the N9831 clinical trial. Pts were categorized as normal weight, overweight or obese using the WHO BMI classification parameters of < 25%, 25–29% and ≥ 30% respectively. For patient characteristics, patients were grouped into non-obese (BMI< 30) and obese (≥ 30) cohorts. DFS was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Comparisons between arms A (chemotherapy alone), B (chemotherapy plus sequential trastuzumab) and C (chemotherapy plus concurrent trastuzumab) were performed using the Cox proportional hazards model, stratified by BMI.

Results: Analysis was completed on 3,017 eligible pts. Obese pts were more likely to be older and postmenopausal (p<0.0001 for both). There was no significant association between BMI and ER/PR status (p=0.07) or histologic tumor grade (p=0.33). Obese pts were found to have significantly larger tumors ≥ 2 cm (p=0.002) and more positive lymph nodes (p=0.02). There was no significant difference in DFS within each intrinsic arm (A, B and C) between the obese and non-obese pts at 3, 5 or 7 yrs of follow up. However, pts in the non-obese group had significantly improved DFS in arm B and C compared to arm A (p=0.001 and p<0.0001 respectively). Also obese pts in arm C had significantly improved DFS compared to obese pts in arm A (p=0.008). There was a trend of improved DFS in the obese group in arm B compared to arm A, but this was not statistically significant (p=0.09). Pts in the normal weight and overweight groups did significantly better in arm B (p=0.02 for both) and arm C (p=0.01 and p=0.002 respectively) compared to arm A.

Conclusions: This analysis of data from the N9831 study confirms that obese pts with early stage HER2+ tumors have worse clinical outcome than pts with BMI < 30%. Adjuvant trastuzumab improved clinical outcome regardless of BMI. This study supports weight loss intervention for obese women with early stage HER2+ BC.

Citation Information: Cancer Res 2011;71(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-12-02.

OT3-01-07: The BEACON Study (BrEAst Cancer Outcomes with NKTR-102): A Phase 3 Open-Label, Randomized, Multicenter Study of NKTR-102 Versus Treatment of Physician's Choice (TPC) in Patients (pts) with Locally Recurrent or Metastatic Breast Cancer (MBC) Previously Treated with an Anthracycline, a Taxane, and Capecitabine (ATC)

Background

NKTR-102 is a next-generation topoisomerase I inhibitor-polymer conjugate with a markedly reduced Cmax and a continuous exposure profile compared to irinotecan. A phase 2 trial of single-agent NKTR-102 compared a dose of 145 mg/m2 every 2w or every 3w in 3rd-line MBC (Awada et al, ASCO 2011). Overall the ORR was 29% (including 3% CR) with the prior ATC subset demonstrating an ORR of 31%. Dosing every 3w was better tolerated; in this arm, median PFS equaled 5.3m and median OS equaled 13.1m.

Trial Design: NKTR-102 will be compared to TPC in an open-label, randomized, parallel, two arm multicenter Phase 3 pivotal study in pts with previously treated locally recurrent or metastatic breast cancer.

Key Entry Criteria: Adult females, with ECOG 0 or 1 with adequate liver, kidney and marrow function. All patients must have received prior therapy with an anthracycline (in neo/adjuvant or metastatic setting or both), a taxane (in neo/adjuvant or metastatic setting or both) and capecitabine (in neo/adjuvant or locally advanced/metastatic setting or both) unless not medically appropriate or explicitly contraindicated for the patient. All chemotherapy- and radiation-related toxicities must have resolved to ≤ Grade 1, except for stable sensory neuropathy ≤ Grade 2 and alopecia. Pts with brain metastases may be eligible, if stable for prior 4 weeks without steroids. Pts with Grade ≥ 2 pre-existing diarrhea or receiving chronic anti-diarrheal supportive care are not eligible.

Statistical Methods: The primary efficacy endpoint is OS. Secondary endpoints include ORR by RECIST v1.1 and PFS. Pts will be randomized 1:1 to NKTR-102 given IV at 145 mg/m2 over 90-min every 21 days or TPC. Patients randomized to TPC will receive single agent chemotherapy, limited to choice of one of the following 5 agents: eribulin, ixabepilone, vinorelbine, gemcitabine, or a taxane. The investigator must decide which agent will be given to the patient prior to randomization. Pts will be stratified by geographical region and disease characteristics.

Target Accrual: Approximately 840 patients (420 pts per treatment arm) will be randomized in order to obtain 615 deaths (alpha = 0.05; power 90% with one interim analysis scheduled when 50% of the deaths have occurred). PK sampling will be performed in a subset of pts and blood and/or tumor samples are planned for potential predictive markers of response and toxicity. Enrollment is expected to remain open until the end of 2013.

Citation Information: Cancer Res 2011;71(24 Suppl):Abstract nr OT3-01-07.

P3-06-02: Identification of Redundant, Tumor Subtype Specific Fusion Transcripts in Primary Breast Tumors

Background: The role of fusion genes and associated fusion transcripts has long been recognized in hematopoietic malignancies. Until quite recently it has been difficult to detect such events on a genomic scale in solid tumors. Consequently, little is known about the potential role of fusion genes, transcripts, and proteins as driver mutations, biomarkers, or therapeutic targets in breast cancer.

Methods: We have developed a novel analytical pipeline, Snowshoes-FTD, for detection of fusion transcripts in breast cancer cell lines and tumor samples (Asmann, et al. NAR 2011; May 27 ePub ahead of print). Preliminary analyses have been carried out with a panel of 8 each ER+, HER2+, and triple negative (TN) primary breast tumors, 8 primary human mammary epithelial cell (HMEC) lines from biopsy samples, plus 16 normal tissues from the Illumina Body Map dataset.

Results: We have identified 120 redundant, tumor-specific fusion transcripts, expressed in two or more tumors and in no non-transformed samples. Sixteen of these represent intrachromosomal fusions and 104 arise from fusion of transcripts that map to two different chromosomes. Every breast tumor expressed one or more fusion transcripts. Twenty-nine fusion transcripts appeared to be tumor subtype specific. Among these, we have identified 2 HER2+, 10 ER+, and 17 triple negative specific redundant transcripts. In general, HER2+ tumors expressed fewer fusion transcripts (range 4 to 28/tumor) compared to TN (range11 to 44/tumor). Chromosomal distribution patterns were also markedly different among the tumor subtypes. For example, ER+ tumors expressed a preponderance of redundant fusion transcripts that involve chr1 and 2, whereas TN tumors had no fusion transcripts that map to either chromosome. Conversely, the predominant locus for TN fusion transcripts was chr19, which contains only one HER2+ fusion and no ER+ fusion transcripts.

Conclusions: Primary breast tumors express many chimaeric transcripts, which we presume to arise primarily from genomic rearrangements. The majority of these transcripts are redundant, and a subset are tumor subtype specific. These transcripts may mark regions of chromosomal instability. HER2+ tumors, in general, appear to evidence less chromosomal instability, as inferred from fusion transcripts; although some HER2+ tumors appear to be quite unstable. TN tumors contain many more redundant fusion transcripts, implying increased genomic instability, particularly in chr19. We conclude that these fusion transcripts represent a class of heretofore unrecognized biomarkers that may be used for sub-classification of breast tumors. Some of these transcripts appear to encode proteins that may function as tumor-subtype-specific driver mutations and may have potential as therapeutic targets in breast cancer.

Citation Information: Cancer Res 2011;71(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-06-02.

OT3-01-14: N0937: Phase II Trial of Brostallicin and Cisplatin in Patients with Metastatic Triple Negative Breast Cancer

Background

Tumors that are negative for estrogen and progesterone receptors and do not over express HER2 are referred as “triple negative” breast cancer (TNBC). These tumors are characterized by unique molecular profiles on gene expression arrays, aggressive behavior with a high recurrence rate, an increased risk of visceral metastases, poor prognosis and lack of targeted therapies. Brostallicin is a novel synthetic compound from the class of DNA minor groove binding (MGB) anti-cancer agents. It retains activity in cancer cells resistant to alkylating agents, topoisomerase I inhibitors and is fully active against DNA-mismatch repair deficient tumor cells. Cells expressing relatively high glutathione/glutathione S-transferase (GSH/GST) levels are more susceptible to brostallicin antitumor efficacy. Cisplatin administration increases expression of GST in tumor cells leading to an increased anti-tumor efficacy of brostallicin.

Trial design: Single-stage phase II study — based on the effects of cisplatin on GSH/GST levels in preclinical models, the most reasonable sequence to explore was cisplatin on Day 1 followed by brostallicin on Day 2 repeated every 21 days.

Eligibility criteria: Women or men ≥18 years of age with confirmed adenocarcinoma of the breast with clinical evidence of measurable metastatic disease and triple negative subtype according to current ASCO CAP guidelines [ER/PR ≤1%; HER2 negative), who received 0–4 prior chemotherapy regimens in the metastatic setting; with adequate hematologic, renal and hepatic functions; and no active CNS metastases.

Aims: To study the efficacy of the novel drug, brostallicin, as well as to serve as proof of concept of its mechanism of action in TNBC. The primary endpoint is to evaluate clinical efficacy of the combination of brostallicin and cisplatin in the treatment of patients with metastatic TNBC, as measured by progression-free survival (PFS) at 3 months with 89% power (0.10 significance level) to detect an absolute difference of 20%. Secondary endpoints include ORR by RECIST, duration of response, 6-month PFS, overall survival (OS) and adverse event profile. Tertiary endpoints include assessment of 1) GSH levels prior to the administration of cisplatin and of brostallicin; and 2) the prevalence of BCRA-1 mutation by IHC in the primary or metastatic tumor.

Statistical methods: The largest 3-month PFS proportion where the proposed treatment regimen would be considered ineffective in this population was estimated at 35% based on the median PFS of 60 days in patients with metastatic TNBC enrolled in the N0234 trial (erlotinib and gemcitabine as 1st/2nd line), and the smallest 3-month PFS success proportion that may warrant subsequent studies with the proposed regimen in this patient population was estimated at 55%. The interim analysis will be reported when the 20th eligible patient has been followed for 3 months.

Present accrual and target accrual: 21 patients have been accrued at the time of abstract submission (June 2011). Target accrual is 42 evaluable patients.

Citation Information: Cancer Res 2011;71(24 Suppl):Abstract nr OT3-01-14.

A phase II pilot trial incorporating bevacizumab into dose-dense doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide followed by paclitaxel in patients with lymph node positive breast cancer: a trial coordinated by the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group

BACKGROUND

E2104 was designed to evaluate the safety of two different strategies incorporating bevacizumab into anthracycline-containing adjuvant therapy as a precursor to a definitive randomized phase III trial.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients were sequentially assigned to one of two treatment arms. In addition to dose-dense doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide followed by paclitaxel (Taxol) (ddAC→T), all patients received bevacizumab (10 mg/kg every 2 weeks × 26) initiated either concurrently with AC (Arm A: ddBAC→BT→B) or with paclitaxel (Arm B: ddAC→BT→B). The primary end point was incidence of clinically apparent cardiac dysfunction (CHF).

RESULTS

Patients enrolled were 226 in number (Arm A 104, Arm B 122). Grade 3 hypertension, thrombosis, proteinuria and hemorrhage were reported for 12, 2, 2 and <1% of patients, respectively. Two patients developed grade 3 or more cerebrovascular ischemia. Three patients in each arm developed CHF. There was no significant difference between arms in the proportion of patients with an absolute decrease in left ventricular ejection fraction of >15% or >10% to below the lower limit of normal post AC or post bevacizumab.

CONCLUSIONS

Incorporation of bevacizumab into anthracycline-containing adjuvant therapy does not result in prohibitive cardiac toxicity. The definitive phase III trial (E5103) was activated with systematic and extensive cardiac monitoring to define the true impact of bevacizumab on cardiac function.

North Central Cancer Treatment Group (NCCTG) N0432: phase II trial of docetaxel with capecitabine and bevacizumab as first-line chemotherapy for patients with metastatic breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Docetaxel (T; Taxotere) with capecitabine (X) is active against metastatic breast cancer (MBC); bevacizumab (BV) has demonstrated efficacy with taxanes in the first-line setting. This study was conducted to assess the safety and efficacy of TX-BV in patients with MBC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In this single-arm, multicenter phase II study, patients received first-line bevacizumab 15 mg/kg and docetaxel 75 mg/m(2) on day 1 and capecitabine 825 mg/m(2) twice per day on days 1-14 every 21 days. Primary and secondary end points were tumor response rate (RR), overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and toxicity.

RESULTS

A total of 45 assessable patients received TX-BV for a median of seven cycles. Two complete and 20 partial responses were observed (overall RR 49%); nine patients had stable disease >6 months, for a clinical benefit rate of 69%. Median response duration was 11.8 months. Median OS and PFS were 28.4 and 11.1 months, respectively. Grade 3/4 adverse events included hand-foot syndrome (29%), fatigue (20%), febrile neutropenia (18%), and diarrhea (18%). In cycles 3-10, median dose levels of docetaxel and capecitabine were 60 mg/m(2) and 660 mg/m(2), respectively.

CONCLUSION

TX-BV demonstrated significant activity; dose modifications were required to manage drug-related toxic effects.

N0332 phase 2 trial of weekly irinotecan hydrochloride and docetaxel in refractory metastatic breast cancer: a North Central Cancer Treatment Group (NCCTG) Trial

BACKGROUND

Because of the single-agent activity of irinotecan hydrochloride, combination of irinotecan and docetaxel treatment against metastatic breast cancer (MBC) should be evaluated.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Single-stage phase 2 study of irinotecan and docetaxel to evaluate tumor response, toxicity, time to progression, and overall survival was carried out. Regimen of docetaxel (25 mg/m(2)) and irinotecan (70 mg/m(2)) was administered on days 1 and 8 of each 3-week cycle. Patients had histologically confirmed breast adenocarcinoma and metastatic cancer measurable with RECIST.

RESULTS

Of 70 patients enrolled, 64 were assessable. Prior treatment with an anthracycline and a taxane was required. Eighteen (28%) patients [95% confidence interval (CI) 15% to 31%] had tumor response, plus four patients had stable disease (less than 30% decrease in sum of longest diameter and less than 20% increase) for >6 months. The clinical benefit rate was 34% overall. Median duration of tumor response was 6.7 months (95% CI 4.2-37.7 months); median follow-up was 18.6 months (range 8.5-37.7 months). The most common severe adverse events included fatigue [n = 16 (25%)] and neutropenia [n = 13 (20%)].

CONCLUSIONS

Weekly dosing of combination of irinotecan and docetaxel is active against MBC. However, the response rate to our regimen was not significantly better than single-agent docetaxel. Other schedules of irinotecan plus docetaxel should be considered for future studies.

NCCTG N0338: effect of docetaxel and carboplatin on VEGF, PGE2, and immune cells in patients with stage II or III breast cancer

Abstract #5110

Background: It has been demonstrated that certain chemotherapeutic drugs such as taxanes increases cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) levels. Upregulation of COX-2 may be a resistance mechanism of the tumor, or a method to modulate toxic effects of the agent. COX-2 is associated with less differentiated and more aggressive breast cancers, and the expression may be a prognostic indicator of disease. Studies defining the “true” impact of therapy on COX-2 activity are lacking. Hypothesis: Chemotherapy increases COX-2 function in patients with invasive breast cancer. This leads to increased PGE2, VEGF, and downregulation of immune responses. Objective: Patients with stage II or III breast cancer were enrolled in a phase II preoperative chemotherapy trial of docetaxel and carboplatin administered every two weeks (4 cycles). We evaluated circulating PGE2, VEGF, and immune cell phenotype at diagnosis and after chemotherapy. Results: Fifty seven patients were enrolled in the study and 32 were analyzed in the lab, most of them being infiltrating ductal carcinoma. Four had complete response, 20 had partial response, and 8 were non-responders. Due to low numbers of patients analyzed, statistical significance was not achieved in most instances. Nevertheless, intriguing data has been generated that warrants further investigation. VEGF/PGE2 versus clinical response to chemotherapy: 86% of the patients in whom VEGF levels decrease post chemotherapy were responders compared to 60% in which VEGF remained unchanged or increased slightly. Responders had decreased VEGF levels on average, while the non-responders increased. Interestingly, even with low sample size, if both VEGF and PGE2 levels increase post treatment the response rate to chemotherapy is significantly lower (55% versus 88% if both VEGF and PGE2 decrease post treatment, p=0.05). Thus, both VEGF and PGE2 are critical factors in determining response rate. Whether COX-2 activity is driving both factors or whether VEGF is independently regulated is yet to be determined. Clinical Response versus Dendritic cell (DCs) / T-cell data: Data revealed highly important trends that warrant future investigation. Patients with increased B7H4 (an immunosuppressive molecule expressed on tolerizing DCs) were non-responders while patients with decreased B7H4 were responders. In contrast, responders had increased levels of CD80 and CD86 (co-stimulatory molecules expressed on activating DCs). VEGF/PGE2 Change versus Dendritic/T-cell data: When VEGF increased post treatment, B7H4 and FoxP3 (T regulatory cells) increased, while CD80, CD86, and CD8 decreased. The association between VEGF and immune cells post chemotherapy treatment is the first indication that VEGF may regulate immune cell function possibly independent of COX-2 activity. These data suggest that anti-VEGF therapy (which may include COX-2 inhibitor) may not only augment responses to chemotherapy but may also augment immune responses post chemotherapy.

Citation Information: Cancer Res 2009;69(2 Suppl):Abstract nr 5110.

Meta-analysis of adverse event rates in 15 North Central Cancer Treatment Group phase II metastatic breast cancer clinical trials for the development of adverse event stopping rules

Abstract #6149

Background: Internal Review Boards and Data and Safety Monitoring Boards often require protocol-specified adverse event (AE) stopping rules for safety monitoring. However, availability of safety data for investigational agent(s) may be limited at the time of protocol development in the phase II setting. This meta-analysis was undertaken to quantify the variability of AE rates in North Central Cancer Treatment Group (NCCTG) phase II metastatic breast cancer (MBC) clinical trials and to investigate whether study factors are associated with AE rates for the development of AE stopping rules in future phase II clinical trials.&#x2028; Methods: All closed NCCTG phase II MBC clinical trials using CTC v2.0 or CTCAE v3.0 for AE monitoring were selected. Rates of G3/4 AEs (overall, hematologic [H], and non-hematologic [NH]) and of study discontinuation [SD] due to AEs were calculated for each trial. Associations between study factors [number of agents (single vs combination); line of therapy (first-line only vs other); and type of therapy (chemotherapy vs other)] and AE rates were assessed via Wilcoxon rank sum tests.&#x2028; Results: 15 trials met inclusion criteria. 7 used CTCAE v3.0; 6 investigated single agents; 5 investigated first-line therapy; and 11 investigated chemotherapy regimens. 694 pts were evaluable for AE analysis. The G3/4 AE rate across trials was 68% (16-98%) overall, 45% (0-96%) H, and 51% (16-78%) NH. The overall rate of SD due to AEs was 13% (0-40%). The overall rate of G3/4 AEs was significantly lower in single agents vs combination regimens (30% vs 86%, p=0.004). This association held for H (2% vs 66%, p&lt;0.0001) and NH (27% vs 57%, p=0.03) Aes. The rate of SD due to AEs was also significantly lower in single agents vs combination regimens (0.5% vs 15%, p=0.04). The rate of G3/4 AEs was significantly higher in first-line only trials vs other trials (overall: 90% vs 47%, p=0.04; H: 73% vs 5%, p=0.02; NH: 66% vs 41%, p=0.08). The rate of SD due to AEs was also significantly higher in first-line only trials (18% vs 4%, p=0.008). The only significant association with chemotherapy vs other therapy was G3/4 H AE rates (51% vs 2%, p=0.02).&#x2028; Discussion: High variability in G3/4 AE rates overall and in H and NH AEs was noted in these 15 trials. There is also high variability in the rates of SD due to AEs. The data suggest that clinical trials with single agent regimens have lower AE rates than combination regimens and, surprisingly, trials of first-line therapy only have higher AE rates than other trials. This may be due to more aggressive therapy being tested in the first-line setting. Although data from previous trials with the investigational agent(s) should be used for developing AE stopping rules when available, this study suggests that study factors such as number of agents and line of therapy can be useful when previous data are limited.

Citation Information: Cancer Res 2009;69(2 Suppl):Abstract nr 6149.

Comparison of binary efficacy endpoints in 11 North Central Cancer Treatment Group phase II metastatic breast cancer clinical trials

Abstract #6147

Background: Phase II metastatic breast cancer (MBC) clinical trials evaluating efficacy of cancer treatments are often designed using a binary primary endpoint (i.e., each evaluable patient [pt] is classified as a “success” or “failure”). In the era of novel agents in cancer research, endpoints such as 6-month progression-free survival [PFS6] for measuring efficacy of cytostatic agents are more commonly being used. This meta-analysis was undertaken to compare two binary classifications of PFS6 and to compare these binary endpoints with other efficacy endpoints in the phase II setting.&#x2028; Material and Methods: All closed North Central Cancer Treatment Group (NCCTG) phase II MBC clinical trials using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) with at least 1 year of follow-up since last pt accrued were selected. All eligible pts initiating treatment were included. Two binary classifications of PFS6 were computed for each trial. Success for PFS6-1 is defined as on study treatment 6 months from registration without documentation of disease progression. Success for PFS6-2 does not require a pt to be on study treatment at 6 months. Also computed for each trial are Kaplan-Meier (KM) estimates of PFS6 (PFS6-KM) and 1-year overall survival (OS1-KM). Trial-level endpoints were summarized using descriptive statistics and compared using weighted (by trial sample sizes) Pearson correlations. Lastly, the concordance rate of PFS6-1 and PFS6-2 status with OS status at 1 year at the pt level was computed across all pts (pts censored for OS prior to one year were excluded [n=10]).&#x2028; Results: 11 trials met inclusion criteria. All trials required measurable disease and had a single arm. 485 evaluable pts were accrued (median 48 pts per trial [range 19-77]). Median PFS6-1 was 27% (range 10-44%) and median PFS6-2 was 34% (range 10-73%). The median trial-level difference between PFS6-1 and PFS6-2 was 5% (range 0-43%). The correlation between PFS6-1 and PFS6-2 was 0.81 (p&lt;0.01). Among the endpoints, PFS6-2 and PFS6-KM had the highest correlation (&gt;0.99, p&lt;0.01) due to only 2 pts being censored for PFS prior to 6 months. Among the PFS endpoints, OS1-KM was most highly correlated with PFS6-1 (0.79, p&lt;0.01) with the correlations with PFS6-2 and PFS6-KM not being statistically different from zero (both 0.59 with p&gt;0.05). However, overall patient-level concordance between PFS6 status and OS status at 1 year was higher using PFS6-2 (68%) than PFS6-1 (59%).&#x2028; Discussion: Differences were observed between the two binary classifications of PFS6. PFS6 with (as compared to without) the requirement that a pt be on study treatment at 6 months appears to have higher correlation with OS at 1 year at the trial level but lower concordance with OS status at 1 year at the pt level. Selection of the historical control should take into consideration the definition of PFS6 being used.

Citation Information: Cancer Res 2009;69(2 Suppl):Abstract nr 6147.

GRB7-dependent pathways are potential therapeutic targets in triple-negative breast cancer

Abstract #25

Background: Breast cancer lacking expression of the estrogen and progesterone receptor and overexpression of HER2/neu (ie, "triple-negative” disease) accounts for about 10-15% of all breast cancer and is characterized by a higher risk of recurrence, early recurrence, resistance to cytotoxic therapy, and lack of any specific targeted therapy.&#x2028; Methods: We extracted RNA from primary tumor samples of 246 patients with stage I-III triple-negative breast cancer (confirmed in a central lab) treated with 4 cycles of adjuvant doxorubicin (60 mg/m2) plus cyclophosphamide (600 mg/m2) or docetaxel (60 mg/m2) who were enrolled on trial E2197, and correlated RNA expression (by quantitative RT-PCR using a panel of 371 rationally selected genes) with recurrence. There was no difference in recurrence between the two treatment arms in the entire study population, nor in the 246 patients in this analysis (of whom 59 recurred) after a median followup of 76 months.&#x2028; Results: Higher expression of GRB7 was the only gene significantly associated with an increased risk of recurrence (nominal p value 0.0000853, Korn's adjusted p value controlling false discovery at 10% (KP10) p=0.0359), but did not correlate with any clinicopathologic features except age (low expression associated with age &gt; 65 years, p=0.03). In a Cox proportional hazards model adjusted for age, nodal status, tumor size, and grade, higher GRB7 expression was associated with an increased risk of recurrence when evaluated as a continuous variable (hazard ratio 3.41; p = 0.001) or as a dichotomous variable (hazard ratio 2.24 above vs. below median; p=0.006). The 5-year recurrence rates were 10.5% (95% C.I.7.8%, 14.1%) in the low and 20.4% (95% C.I. 16.5%, 25.0%) in the high GRB7 groups. There were only six genes whose expression correlated with GRB7 (r&gt; 0.4), including ERBB2 (r=0.70), DDR1 (discoidin domain receptor tyrosine kinase 1; r=0.53), KRT19 (keratin 19; r=0.49), ERBB3 (r=0.48), GPR56 (G protein-coupled receptor 56; r=0.48) and PHB (prohibitin; r=0.42).&#x2028; Conclusions: GRB7 is a calmodulin-binding protein which has an SH2 (Src homology 2) domain that binds to phosphorylated tyrosine residues and other specific protein targets, and which plays a critical role in signaling (EGFR, HER2), motility (eprhins), migration (focal adhesion kinase), and cell-matrix/cell-cell interactions (integrins). Higher GRB7 RNA expression is associated with a significantly higher risk of recurrence in triple-negative breast cancer, indicating that GRB7 or GRB7-dependent pathways are potential therapeutic targets in triple-negative disease.

Citation Information: Cancer Res 2009;69(2 Suppl):Abstract nr 25.

NSABP B-30: definitive analysis of quality of life (QOL) and menstrual history (MH) outcomes from a randomized trial evaluating different schedules and combinations of adjuvant therapy containing doxorubicin, docetaxel and cyclophosphamide in women with operable, node-positive breast cancer

Abstract #76

Background: QOL and MH outcomes were integrated into the NSABP B-30 trial as secondary outcomes to the efficacy analyses which are being presented separately. Explicit secondary aims of the NSABP B-30 study were 1) to compare toxicities among the regimens, 2) to compare QOL, and 3) to examine differences in amenorrhea and its relationship to symptoms, QOL, and efficacy. Here we examine the secondary aims of the study as a companion to the efficacy results that are presented separately.&#x2028; Materials and Methods: 5351 pts with cT1-3, N0-1, M0 were enrolled from 3/1/99 to 3/31/2004. 2170 were enrolled on the QOL study, and 2449 were enrolled on the MH study and were randomized to one of three treatment groups: Group 1 [doxorubicin (A) 60 mg/m2 and C 600 mg/m2 q 3 weeks (wks) x 4 followed by docetaxel (T) 100 mg/m2 q 3 wks x 4; Group 2 [A 50 mg/m2 and T 75 mg/m2 q 3 wks x 4]; Group 3 [A 50 mg/m2 T 75 mg/m2 and cyclophosphamide (C) 500 mg/m2 q 3 wks x 4]. All patients with ER-positive tumors received hormonal therapy after completing chemotherapy. Preliminary results from Group 1 have been reported previously (Swain, et al. Breast Cancer Res Treat, 2008).&#x2028; Results: The protocol specifies that 800 deaths are required for the definitive analysis of treatment, QOL, and MH outcomes, which are expected to occur by fall 2008. For this final report, results from a comparison of the three arms will be analyzed and presented.

Citation Information: Cancer Res 2009;69(2 Suppl):Abstract nr 76.

Serum biomarker analysis in a phase II study of irinotecan in refractory metastatic breast cancer (MBC)

Abstract #6074

Objective: To analyze blood-serum biomarkers (HER2, EGFR, uPA, and TIMP-1) for prediction of response to treatment in conjunction with Study 96-32-55, a multicenter phase II trial assessing the efficacy and tolerability of two irinotecan schedules in anthracycline- or taxane-refractory MBC patients.&#x2028; Methods: MBC patients who experienced disease progression after one to three chemotherapy regimens, including at least one anthracycline- or taxane-based regimen, were randomly assigned to irinotecan in 6-week cycles comprising 100 mg/m2 weekly for 4 weeks, then a 2-week rest or 240 mg/m2 every 3 weeks. During this study the serum samples from each patient were collected at a possibility of three time points; prior to treatment, at the first occurrence of response, and at completion of or withdrawal from treatment. Response prediction was analyzed using predetermined elevated/non-elevated serum biomarker cutoffs. Percentage changes from baseline to first response and disease progression were analyzed.&#x2028; Results: In the weekly arm, the objective response (CR+PR) rate was 23% (95% CI, 13% to 37%), and in the every-3-weeks arm, the objective response rate was 14% (95% CI, 6% to 26%). Serum biomarker levels were determined for HER2, EGFR, uPA, and TIMP-1 prior to treatment for 91 patients. Of these 91 patients, 17 had serum measurements at first response, and 38 had serum measurements at their completion of study due to disease progression. Only 7 patients had serum-levels collected at all three event-points. The baseline levels of sHER2, EGFR, uPA, and TIMP-1 were not different among responders and non-responders (Fisher's Exact p=0.41, 0.26, 0.68, 0.75). sHER2 level increased by 20.6% from baseline to disease progression (p=0.01). TIMP-1 level was 15.2% lower than baseline at first response (p=0.03), 16.5% higher than baseline at disease progression (p=0.01), and for 7 patients with all three event-point measures, TIMP-1 was 21.8% lower than baseline at first response and was 22.3% higher than baseline at disease progression (p=0.02, 0.04).&#x2028; Conclusions: In this study, serum levels of HER2, EGFR, uPA, and TIMP-1 do not appear to be predictive of response. However, interpretation of the data is compromised due to limited availability of serum at all 3 points. Serum HER2 appears higher at disease progression than at baseline. Serum TIMP-1 appears to decrease from baseline to first response, and then appears to increase at disease progression.

Citation Information: Cancer Res 2009;69(2 Suppl):Abstract nr 6074.

Tolerability of lapatinib given concurrently with paclitaxel and trastuzumab as part of adjuvant therapy in patients with resected HER2+ breast cancer: initial safety data from the Mayo Clinic cancer research consortium trial RC0639

Abstract #2109

Background: Despite the impressive results of the recently released trastuzumab adjuvant therapy trials, 15% of patients with HER2 overexpressing or amplified breast cancer developed tumor relapse at 4 years. Lapatinib is a small molecule reversible TKI that inhibits both ErbB1 and ErbB2. The current study was developed to assess the cardiac safety and feasibility of adding lapatinib to paclitaxel and trastuzumab following as part of adjuvant therapy.&#x2028; Methods: A single-arm phase II study of doxorubicin (A, 60 mg/m2 day 1) and cyclophosphamide (C, 600 mg/m2 day 1) [q2w or q3w for 4 cycles]; followed by paclitaxel (P, 80 mg/m2 days 1, 8, 15), trastuzumab (T, 4 mg/kg loading dose then 2 mg/kg days 1, 8, 15), and lapatinib (L, 1000 mg days 1-21) [12 weeks]; followed by T (6 mg/kg day 1) and L (1000 mg days 1-21) [40 weeks] was conducted. The primary endpoint was the incidence of congestive heart failure. The current unplanned safety analysis was undertaken due to the observance of a high rate of G3/4 diarrhea.&#x2028; Results: From April 2007 to June 2008, 98 pts were enrolled and initiated study treatment. Median age was 51 (range 32-72). Among 83 pts with adverse event (AE) data available, 50 (60%) pts have experienced a G3/4 non-hematologic AE. During post-AC treatment, among 53 pts with AE data available, 31 (58.5%) patients have experienced a G3/4 non-hematologic AE with 24 (45%) patients reporting G3/4 diarrhea. Median cycle of onset of G3/4 diarrhea was cycle 5 (first cycle of PTL) with 16 (64%) cases first reported during cycle 5 and 5 (20%) cases first reported during cycle 6. Among 57, 46, 38, and 32 pts receiving treatment with PTL during cycles 5-8, 65%, 57%, 61%, and 72% of patients received the full L dose, respectively. 31 patients have ended active treatment with 10 due to patient refusal and 8 due to adverse events.&#x2028; Conclusions: Preliminary data suggest that L given concurrently with P and T at a dose of 1000 mg per day induces an unacceptable rate of moderate to severe diarrhea. Careful monitoring of diarrhea as well as L dose reduction and initiation of loperamide at first occurrence of diarrhea are recommended. The dose of L when given concurrently with P and T has been amended to 750 mg per day in the current study and safety data for the 1000 mg and 750 mg per day cohorts will be presented. Implications for the ongoing ALTTO study will also be presented.

Citation Information: Cancer Res 2009;69(2 Suppl):Abstract nr 2109.

Clinical outcomes after a diagnosis of brain metastases in patients with estrogen- and/or human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive versus triple-negative breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Women with triple-negative (TN) breast cancer are at increased risk of distant metastases and have reduced survival versus other breast cancer patients. Relative survival of women with TN breast cancer who develop brain metastases is unknown.

METHODS

Patients with breast cancer who developed brain metastases at our institution from 1993 to 2006 were reviewed. Four survival time intervals were compared in patients with TN disease and those with non-TN disease: initial diagnosis to distant metastases, distant metastases to brain metastases, brain metastases to death, and overall diagnosis to death.

RESULTS

One hundred and eighteen patients were identified. Fifty-one (50%) of 103 were estrogen receptor positive, 26 (39%) of 67 were human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 positive, and 20 (22%) of 91 were TN. Survival times were shorter for TN patients, with overall survival of 26 months in TN patients versus 49 months for non-TN patients. In TN patients, time to development of distant metastases, brain metastases, and death after brain metastases was shorter than in non-TN patients.

CONCLUSION

Patients with TN disease were more likely to develop distant metastases earlier than non-TN patients, developed brain metastases sooner, and had shorter overall survival.

Intent-to-treat analysis of the placebo-controlled trial of letrozole for extended adjuvant therapy in early breast cancer: NCIC CTG MA.17

BACKGROUND

MA.17 evaluated letrozole or placebo after 5 years of tamoxifen and showed significant improvement in disease-free survival (DFS) for letrozole [hazard ratio (HR) 0.57, P = 0.00008]. The trial was unblinded and placebo patients were offered letrozole.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

An intent-to-treat analysis of all outcomes, before and after unblinding, on the basis of the original randomization was carried out.

RESULTS

In all, 5187 patients were randomly allocated to the study at baseline and, at unblinding, 1579 (66%) of 2383 placebo patients accepted letrozole. At median follow-up of 64 months (range 16-95), 399 recurrences or contralateral breast cancers (CLBCs) (164 letrozole and 235 placebo) occurred. Four-year DFS was 94.3% (letrozole) and 91.4% (placebo) [HR 0.68, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.55-0.83, P = 0.0001] and showed superiority for letrozole in both node-positive and -negative patients. Corresponding 4-year distant DFS was 96.3% and 94.9% (HR 0.80, 95% CI 0.62-1.03, P = 0.082). Four-year overall survival was 95.1% for both groups. The annual rate of CLBC was 0.28% for letrozole and 0.46% for placebo patients (HR 0.61, 95% CI 0.39-0.97, P = 0.033).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients originally randomly assigned to receive letrozole within 3 months of stopping tamoxifen did better than placebo patients in DFS and CLBC, despite 66% of placebo patients taking letrozole after unblinding.

Premenopausal endocrine-responsive early breast cancer: who receives chemotherapy?

BACKGROUND

The role of chemotherapy in addition to combined endocrine therapy for premenopausal women with endocrine-responsive early breast cancer remains an open question, yet trials designed to answer it have repeatedly failed to adequately accrue. The International Breast Cancer Study Group initiated two concurrent trials in this population: in Premenopausal Endocrine Responsive Chemotherapy (PERCHE), chemotherapy use is determined by randomization and in Tamoxifen and Exemestane Trial (TEXT) by physician choice. PERCHE closed with inadequate accrual; TEXT accrued rapidly.

METHODS

From 2003 to 2006, 1317 patients (890 with baseline data) were randomly assigned to receive ovarian function suppression (OFS) plus tamoxifen or OFS plus exemestane for 5 years in TEXT. We explore patient-related factors according to whether or not chemotherapy was given using descriptive statistics and classification and regression trees.

RESULTS

Adjuvant chemotherapy was chosen for 64% of patients. Lymph node status was the predominant determinant of chemotherapy use (88% of node positive treated versus 46% of node negative). Geography, patient age, tumor size and grade were also determinants, but degree of receptor positivity and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 status were not.

CONCLUSIONS

The perceived estimation of increased risk of relapse is the primary determinant for using chemotherapy despite uncertainties regarding the degree of benefit it offers when added to combined endocrine therapy in this population.

Safety profiles of tamoxifen and the aromatase inhibitors in adjuvant therapy of hormone-responsive early breast cancer

Adjuvant endocrine therapy plays an important role in the management of hormone-receptor-positive early breast cancer, and has increased life expectancy for millions of women. Many patients receive adjuvant treatment for at least 5 years following tumor resection, hence good long-term safety is important for endocrine agents to gain widespread acceptance. Tamoxifen has been used as adjuvant therapy for early breast cancer for many years, and safety data have been well documented, but a poor risk:benefit profile limits treatment duration to 5 years. Increased efficacy over tamoxifen and good tolerability have recently made the third-generation aromatase inhibitors (AIs) the first-choice agents for adjuvant endocrine therapy; however, it is currently not known whether AI therapy, like tamoxifen, will be limited to 5 years. Many side effects of endocrine therapy, such as hot flushes and mood disturbances, are related to estrogen deprivation and are common to tamoxifen and AIs, reflecting the mechanism of action of these drugs. In addition, tamoxifen has estrogenic effects that are beneficial in some tissues: tamoxifen lowers serum cholesterol levels and protects against bone loss and cardiovascular disease, but is also associated with potentially life-threatening side effects, such as endometrial cancer and thromboembolic disease. As AIs lack estrogenic activity, they are not associated with these serious adverse events. Clinical trials comparing AIs with tamoxifen in the adjuvant setting have shown that AIs are well tolerated and are associated with a lower incidence of gynecological symptoms and hot flushes than tamoxifen. However, AIs are associated with musculoskeletal side effects, such as arthralgia, myalgia and bone loss, but these events are preventable or manageable. The effects of AIs on lipid metabolism and the cardiovascular system are still debatable, but placebo-controlled trials provide no evidence to suggest that AIs adversely affect these systems. Furthermore, the AIs allow women to maintain a good quality of life, comparable with women receiving tamoxifen or placebo, and are a cost-effective therapeutic option. Ongoing trials will provide more information regarding the long-term effects of AI therapy and will provide comparative data on the efficacy and safety of the different AIs, thereby helping to determine the optimal treatment strategy for these highly effective and well-tolerated drugs.

Phase II trial of oral vinorelbine for the treatment of metastatic breast cancer in patients ≥65 years of age: an NCCTG study

BACKGROUND

A one-stage phase II trial was conducted to assess the tumor response rate and toxicity profile of single agent oral vinorelbine as first or second-line chemotherapy for women at least 65 years of age with metastatic breast cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Twenty-five patients with metastatic breast cancer aged > or = 65 years of age were enrolled to receive oral vinorelbine on a weekly basis. The oral vinorelbine was given at 60 mg/m2 weekly for the first four doses and was increased to 70 mg/m2 for the subsequent administrations if there was no grade 4 neutropenia or no more than one episode of grade 3 neutropenia. Therapy was continued until progression or intolerable toxicity.

RESULTS

Twenty-five patients were included and evaluable for analysis. One patient (4%) achieved a partial response (PR) that lasted for more than 13 months. Two additional patients remained stable for at least 6 months for a clinical benefit rate (PR + stable disease) of 12%. The 1-year survival rate was estimated to be 48% (95% CI 30% to 74.5%). Median time to progression was estimated to be 4.7 months (95% CI 2.0-5.5 months) and the 9-month disease progression-free rate was estimated to be 8% (95% CI 30.9% to 74.5%). The treatment was fairly well tolerated with grade 3 neutropenia in 12.5%, fatigue in 12.5% of the patients, and grade 2 neuromotor and neurosensory toxicities in 12.5% and 8.3%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Oral vinorelbine as a single agent at these dose and schedule in this population of women > or = 65 years is well tolerated but has a low level of objective efficacy for the treatment of metastatic breast cancer.

A phase II trial of a combination of pemetrexed and gemcitabine in patients with metastatic breast cancer: an NCCTG study

PURPOSE

This phase II study was undertaken to define the efficacy and toxicity of pemetrexed in combination with gemcitabine in patients with metastatic breast cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with measurable metastatic breast cancer who had previously received an anthracycline and a taxane in either the adjuvant or metastatic setting were treated with gemcitabine 1250 mg/m2 (intravenous; days 1 and 8) and pemetrexed 500 mg/m2 (intravenous; day 8) every 21 days.

RESULTS

Fifty-nine patients received a median of five cycles (range one to 22) of treatment and were followed until death or for a median of 28 months (range 19.4-36.6) among living patients. Fourteen partial responses for an overall response rate of 24% [95% confidence interval (CI) 16% to 39%] were documented. Nine (15%; CI 5% to 32%) patients had stable disease for >6 months. The median survival time was 10.3 months (95% CI 8.3-18.9) and the 1 year survival rate was 49% (95% CI 38% to 64%). The median time to progression was estimated to be 3.7 months (95% CI 2.3-5.3). The most common grade 3 or 4 toxicities were neutropenia and thrombocytopenia in 83% and 27% of patients, respectively. Fourteen percent of patients experienced febrile neutropenia. Other common grade 3 or 4 non-hematological toxicities included fatigue (17%), dyspnea (15%), rash (7%) and anorexia (5%).

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of pemetrexed and gemcitabine is clinically active, with an overall response rate of 24% in patients with metastatic breast cancer who have previously been treated with an anthracycline and a taxane. Myelosuppression (66% grade 4 neutropenia and 14% febrile neutropenia) was the major treatment-related toxicity observed for this combination.

The influence of letrozole on serum lipid concentrations in postmenopausal women with primary breast cancer who have completed 5 years of adjuvant tamoxifen (NCIC CTG MA.17L)

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to evaluate changes in serum lipid parameters {cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, triglycerides and lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)]}, in postmenopausal women receiving letrozole or placebo after adjuvant tamoxifen for early stage breast cancer (NCIC CTG MA.17L).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

MA.17L is a substudy of MA.17, a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of letrozole 2.5 mg taken daily for 5 years in postmenopausal women with primary breast cancer completing approximately 5 years of prior adjuvant tamoxifen. Patients consenting to participate in this companion study had blood drawn and lipid parameters (total cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, Lp(a), triglycerides) evaluated at baseline, 6 months, 12 months and yearly thereafter until completion of protocol therapy. It was required that women be non-hyperlipidemic and not taking lipid-lowering drugs at time of entry on this trial.

RESULTS

Three hundred and forty seven women were enrolled in the study. The letrozole and the placebo groups demonstrated marginally significant differences in the percentage change from baseline in HDL cholesterol at 6 months (P=0.049), in LDL cholesterol at 12 months (P=0.033) and triglycerides at 24 months (P=0.036). All comparisons of lipid parameters at other time points were not significantly different between the two treatment groups. No statistically significant differences in the number of patients exceeding the thresholds defined for the lipid parameters were found between the two treatment groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The MA.17 trial demonstrated a significant improvement in disease-free survival with the use of letrozole as extended adjuvant therapy post tamoxifen. Results from this study suggests that letrozole does not significantly alter serum cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, triglycerides or Lp(a) in non-hyperlidiemic postmenopausal women with primary breast cancer treated up to 36 months following at least 5 years of adjuvant tamoxifen therapy. These findings further support the tolerability of extended adjuvant letrozole in postmenopausal women following standard tamoxifen therapy.

A randomized phase II study of sequential docetaxel and doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide in patients with metastatic breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Docetaxel has yielded promising response rates as a component of doxorubicin-based combination schedules in patients with metastatic breast cancer, including docetaxel/doxorubicin and docetaxel/doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide (AC). This randomized two-stage phase II study was conducted to evaluate sequential treatment with docetaxel and AC as first-line treatment in patients with recurrent or metastatic breast cancer previously untreated with chemotherapy for metastatic disease.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Thirty-three patients were randomized to either docetaxel (100 mg/m(2)) on day 1 of a 21-day cycle for three cycles followed by AC (60/600 mg/m(2)) on day 1 of a 21-day cycle for three cycles (n = 17) or vice-versa (n = 16), without prophylactic granulocyte colony-stimulating factor support. In addition, we compared pre-treatment serum sErbB1 and sErbB2 protein concentrations with that of an age- and menopausal status-matched group of healthy women, and examined changes in serum sErbB1 and sErbB2 protein concentrations in these two treatment schedules. Data from each one of the two arms of the trial (docetaxel then AC, or AC and then docetaxel) were analyzed separately.

RESULTS

Enrollment was suspended after the first-stage of accrual, based on statistical design. Confirmed objective response rates after six cycles of treatment were 35% [95% confidence interval (CI) 14% to 62%] with docetaxel then AC and 38% (95% CI 15% to 65%) with AC then docetaxel. Dose reductions were frequent and mostly due to grade 4 neutropenia. Median survival time was 2.5 years in the docetaxel then AC group, and 1.1 years in the AC then docetaxel group. Serum sErbB1 concentrations were not significantly different between the study patients and healthy women, and did not change significantly after three and six cycles of treatment. In contrast, serum sErbB2 concentrations were significantly higher in the study patients compared with healthy women and tended to decrease after three and six cycles of treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Response rates at the end of six cycles of treatment, which led to termination of accrual after the first stage using either the sequence of docetaxel first or docetaxel after AC chemotherapy, were lower than anticipated. However, median survival times and median progression-free survival times are similar to those reported in other studies. These data further suggest that additional studies to assess whether serum sErbB2 concentrations are useful predictors of responsiveness to chemotherapy are warranted.

Multicenter phase II trial of weekly paclitaxel in women with metastatic breast cancer

PURPOSE

We evaluated the safety and efficacy of weekly paclitaxel therapy in women with metastatic breast cancer in a phase II multicenter trial. Entry criteria were relatively liberal to reflect the heterogeneity of metastatic breast cancer in clinical practice.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients had histologically confirmed and measurable metastatic breast cancer. Up to two prior chemotherapy regimens for metastatic disease, including prior therapy with anthracyclines and taxanes and prior high-dose therapy, were allowed. Paclitaxel 80 mg/m(2) was administered weekly for 4 weeks per 4-week cycle.

RESULTS

We enrolled 212 patients; 211 were assessable for toxicity and 177 were assessable for response. Ninety percent of patients had received prior chemotherapy (adjuvant, metastatic, or both), 46% of patients had three or more involved metastatic sites, and 60% of patients had visceral-dominant disease. Responses were documented on two occasions and were independently reviewed. The overall response rate (complete plus partial response) was 21.5% (95% confidence interval, 15.4% to 27.5%), with 41.8% of patients having disease stabilization. Median time to progression was 4.7 months, and overall survival in all 212 patients enrolled was 12.8 months. Therapy was well tolerated, with a 15% incidence of grade 3/4 hematologic toxicity and a 9% incidence of grade 3 neurotoxicity; other serious toxicities were rare. The response rate and toxicity profile in the 34% of patients > or = 65 years of age were similar to that of younger patients.

CONCLUSION

Weekly paclitaxel therapy was well tolerated and demonstrated reasonable activity in this relatively heavily pretreated population with advanced disease. Further study of weekly paclitaxel in combination therapy is warranted.

The role of adjuvant monoclonal antibody therapy for breast cancer: rationale and new studies

HER2 is a member of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) family of tyrosine kinases and is involved in the growth, invasion, metastasis, and prognosis of breast cancer. The rationale for prospective trials evaluating the role of anti-HER2 monoclonal antibody therapy for patients with high-risk HER2-positive resected breast cancer is based on several factors. These include 1) the relative and absolute poor prognosis of patients with node-positive, HER2-positive breast cancer; 2) the emerging data of potential importance concerning anthracyclines as a component of adjuvant therapy for patients with HER2-positive breast cancer; 3) the role of taxanes in the management of patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer; and 4) the feasibility and efficacy of molecularly targeted anti-HER2 monoclonal antibody treatment alone or in combination with chemotherapy for patients with advanced breast cancer.

A preliminary study of serum concentrations of soluble epidermal growth factor receptor (sErbB1), gonadotropins, and steroid hormones in healthy men and women

Soluble ErbB (sErbB) growth factor receptors are being investigated as cancer biomarkers. Gonadotropic and steroid hormones have been shown to modulate the expression of ERBB family members in vivo. Accordingly, the range of sErbB1 values and their relationship to gonadotropic and steroid hormones need to be established in healthy subjects to provide a baseline for future clinical studies. We assayed sera from healthy men and women to determine p110 sErbB1 concentrations by acridinium-linked immunosorbent assay (ALISA). Follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), estradiol, and testosterone concentrations were measured using the ACS:180 Immunoassay Analyzer. Luteinizing hormone (LH) and progesterone concentrations were quantified using the Access Immunoassay System. Unadjusted for age, p110 sErbB1 concentrations in healthy men and women do not differ significantly. However, sErbB1 concentrations show a strong age-gender interaction, increasing with age in men but decreasing with age in women. Consequently, sErbB1 concentrations are significantly higher in premenopausal women compared with either postmenopausal women or age-matched men and in age-matched men compared with postmenopausal women. Serum sErbB1 concentrations show significant negative associations with both FSH and LH concentrations in healthy women and a significant positive association with FSH concentrations in healthy men. Univariate linear regression models show that these respective gonadotropic hormones and age are independent predictors of sErbB1 concentrations in men and women. Multivariate models show that when age and FSH and LH concentrations are mutually adjusted for each other, they account for 22% of the variability observed in sErbB1 concentrations in healthy women. These data support the hypothesis that gonadotropic and steroid hormones may modulate ERBB1 expression in vivo and suggest that age- and gonadotropin-adjusted sErbB1 concentrations may be of clinical utility. Furthermore, these data demonstrate that gender, age, menstrual cycle phase, menopausal status, and exogenous hormone use must be considered when using serum p110 sErbB1 concentrations as cancer biomarkers.