Neurophysiologic cut off values for safe resection of patients with supratentorial gliomas

BACKGROUND

Gliomas have infiltrative nature and tumor volume has direct prognostic value. Optimal resection limits delineated by high-frequency monopolar stimulation with multipulse short train technique is still a matter of debate for safe surgery without (or with acceptable) neurological deficits. It is also an enigma whether the same cut-off values are valid for high and low grades. We aimed to analyze the value of motor mapping/monitoring findings on postoperative motor outcome in diffuse glioma surgery.

METHODS

Patients who were operated on due to glioma with intraoperative neuromonitorization at our institution between 2017 and 2021 were analyzed. Demographic information, pre- and post-operative neurological deficit, magnetic resonance images, resection rates, and motor evoked potential (MEP) findings were analyzed.

RESULTS

Eighty-seven patients of whom 55 had high-grade tumors were included in the study. Total/near-total resection was achieved in 85%. Subcortical motor threshold (ScMTh) from resection cavity to the corticospinal tract was ≤ 2mA in 17; 3 mA in 14; 4 mA in 6; 5 mA in 7, and ≥5mA in 50 patients. On the 6th month examination, six patients (5 with high-grade tumor) had motor deficits. These patients had changes in MEP that exceeded critical threshold during monitoring. Receiver operating characteristic analysis revealed 2.5 mA ScMTh as the cut-off point for limb paresis after awakening and 6 months for the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Subcortical mapping with MEP monitoring helps to achieve safe wider resection. The optimal safe limit for SCMTh was determined as 2.5 mA. Provided that safe threshold values are maintained in MEP, surgeon may force the functional limits by lowering the SCMTh to 1 mA, especially in low-grade gliomas.

Tensile properties of the superior glenohumeral and coracohumeral ligaments

Recent evidence has shown that the superior glenohumeral ligament (SGHL) and coracohumeral ligament (CHL) are important static stabilizers. To clarify the function of these two ligaments, we studied their tensile properties with bone-ligament-bone complexes from fresh-frozen shoulders, 10 SGHLs and 10 CHLs. Each ligament's cross-sectional area was measured, and uniaxial tensile testing of each complex was performed. The stiffness, ultimate load, percent elongation, and energy absorbed to failure of each bone-ligament-bone complex were derived from its load-elongation curve. The cross-sectional area of the coracohumeral ligament was significantly greater than that of the superior glenohumeral ligament of their midportions (CHL, 53.7 +/- 3.2 mm2 vs. SGHL, 11.3 +/- 1.6 mm2, p < 0.05). Results also reveal significant differences between the tensile properties for the two ligaments, with the coracohumeral ligament possessing greater stiffness (CHL, 36.7 +/- 5.9 N/mm vs. SGHL, 17.4 +/- 1.5 N/mm, p < 0.05) and ultimate load (CHL, 359.8 +/- 40.3 N vs. SGHL, 101.9 +/- 11.5 N, p < 0.05) than the superior glenohumeral ligament. Our findings confirm that the coracohumeral ligament is an important capsuloligamentous structure of the glenohumeral joint.

A biomechanical analysis of rotator cuff deficiency in a cadaveric model

We conducted this cadaveric study to define a biomechanical rationale for rotator cuff function in several deficiency states. A dynamic shoulder testing apparatus was used to examine change in middle deltoid muscle force and humeral translation associated with simulated rotator cuff tendon paralyses and various sizes of rotator cuff tears. Supraspinatus paralysis resulted in a significant increase (101%) in the middle deltoid force required to initiate abduction. This increase diminished to only 12% for full glenohumeral abduction. The glenohumeral joint maintained ball-and-socket kinematics during glenohumeral abduction in the scapular plane with an intact rotator cuff. No significant alterations in humeral translation occurred with a simulated supraspinatus paralysis, nor with 1-, 3-, and 5-cm rotator cuff tears, provided the infraspinatus tendon was functional. Global tears resulted in an inability to elevate beyond 25 degrees of glenohumeral abduction despite a threefold increase in middle deltoid force. These results validated the importance of the supraspinatus tendon during the initiation of abduction. Glenohumeral joint motion was not affected when the "transverse force couple" (subscapularis, infraspinatus, and teres minor tendons) remained intact. Significant changes in glenohumeral joint motion occurred only if paralysis or anatomic deficiency violated this force couple. Finally, this model confirmed that rotator cuff disease treatment must address function in addition to anatomy.

Mechanical properties of the long head of the biceps tendon

In this study, the geometric and mechanical properties of the long head of the biceps tendon were determined in order to elucidate its role in shoulder stability. We used a laser-micrometer system to measure the cross-sectional area and shape of seven fresh-frozen tendons at three levels: proximal, middle, and distal levels. The cross-sectional areas were found to be 22.7 +/- 9.3 mm2, 22.7 +/- 3.5 mm2, and 10.8 +/- 2.7 mm2, respectively. While statistically significant differences could not be demonstrated between the magnitudes of the areas, a consistent difference in shape was noted between the proximal and middle levels, the tendon being flatter as it progressed over the humeral head and more triangular as it passed through the bicipital groove. We then performed cyclic relaxation tests and uniaxial tensile testing of the tendons which revealed a cyclic stress relaxation of 18 +/- 4% over ten cycles. All tensile failures occurred within the mid-portion of the tendon substance. Additionally, the modulus was calculated between 3% and 6% strain and found to be 421 +/- 212 MPa, while the ultimate tensile strength, ultimate strain, and strain energy density were 32.5 +/- 5.3 MPa, 10.1 +/- 2.7 %, and 1.9 +/- 0.4 MPa, respectively. These mechanical properties of the long head of the biceps tendon are of the same order of magnitude as tendons from other joints. The high stiffness of this tendon indicates that it has an ability to support the large load transferred to it by the muscle and to act as a humeral head depressor.