In vitro activity of sulbactam-durlobactam against colistin-resistant and/or cefiderocol-non-susceptible, carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii collected in U.S. hospitals

The activity of a novel β-lactamase inhibitor combination, sulbactam-durlobactam (SUL-DUR), was tested against 87 colistin-resistant and/or cefiderocol-non-susceptible carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii clinical isolates collected from U.S. hospitals between 2017 and 2019. Among them, 89% and 97% were susceptible to SUL-DUR and imipenem plus SUL-DUR, with MIC50/MIC90 values of 2 µg/mL/8 µg/mL and 1 µg/mL/4 µg/mL, respectively. The presence of amino acid substitutions in penicillin-binding protein 3, including previously reported A515V or T526S, was associated with SUL-DUR non-susceptibility.

Atypical presentation of progressive disseminated histoplasmosis in a patient recently diagnosed with AIDS

Opportunistic infections, including progressive disseminated histoplasmosis (PDH), may have variable and surprising presentations in patients with AIDS. This can be either a primary infection or reactivation of a latent infection. Latent infections may occur due to being unmasked by the immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome after the initiation of combined antiretroviral therapy. PDH can be difficult to diagnose in patients with AIDS due to its variable presentation and many overlapping symptoms with other opportunistic infections. Serum and urine antigen testing are highly sensitive and typically used as the initial diagnostic test to workup suspected PDH. However, negative antigen and antibody tests do not rule out Histoplasmosis capsulatum infection and suspicion should remain high for PDH in the right clinical context. A definitive diagnosis may require biopsy-proven narrow-based budding yeast. We present an interesting patient with AIDS who presented with worsening cognitive decline and was ultimately diagnosed with PDH based on biopsy histopathology in the setting of negative antigen and antibody testing.

Clinical Impact of Ceftriaxone Resistance in Escherichia coli Bloodstream Infections: A Multicenter Prospective Cohort Study

Background

Ceftriaxone-resistant (CRO-R) Escherichia coli bloodstream infections (BSIs) are common.

Methods

This is a prospective cohort of patients with E coli BSI at 14 United States hospitals between November 2020 and April 2021. For each patient with a CRO-R E coli BSI enrolled, the next consecutive patient with a ceftriaxone-susceptible (CRO-S) E coli BSI was included. Primary outcome was desirability of outcome ranking (DOOR) at day 30, with 50% probability of worse outcomes in the CRO-R group as the null hypothesis. Inverse probability weighting (IPW) was used to reduce confounding.

Results

Notable differences between patients infected with CRO-R and CRO-S E coli BSI included the proportion with Pitt bacteremia score ≥4 (23% vs 15%, P = .079) and the median time to active antibiotic therapy (12 hours [interquartile range {IQR}, 1-35 hours] vs 1 hour [IQR, 0-6 hours]; P < .001). Unadjusted DOOR analyses indicated a 58% probability (95% confidence interval [CI], 52%-63%) for a worse clinical outcome in CRO-R versus CRO-S BSI. In the IPW-adjusted cohort, no difference was observed (54% [95% CI, 47%-61%]). Secondary outcomes included unadjusted and adjusted differences in the proportion of 30-day mortality between CRO-R and CRO-S BSIs (-5.3% [95% CI, -10.3% to -.4%] and -1.8 [95% CI, -6.7% to 3.2%], respectively), postculture median length of stay (8 days [IQR, 5-13 days] vs 6 days [IQR, 4-9 days]; P < .001), and incident admission to a long-term care facility (22% vs 12%, P = .045).

Conclusions

Patients with CRO-R E coli BSI generally have poorer outcomes compared to patients infected with CRO-S E coli BSI, even after adjusting for important confounders.

Assessment of invitrosynergy of daptomycin or vancomycin plus ceftaroline for daptomycin non-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus

The combination of vancomycin or daptomycin plus ceftaroline has showed synergistic results in vitro. This study aimed to investigate in vitro synergy of vancomycin or daptomycin plus ceftaroline for seven patients with daptomycin non-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (SA) bacteremia Thirteen isolates from seven patients were evaluated: two methicillin-susceptible and five methicillin-resistant SA infections. All patients were treated with daptomycin and became non-susceptible (minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) >1 μg/mL) with therapy or had resistant strains initially. Time kill experiments were completed with 0.25 × MIC, 0.5 × MIC, and 0.75 × MIC concentrations. No synergy was seen at 0.25 × MIC. Synergy was observed for 4 isolates with vancomycin plus ceftaroline and with daptomycin plus ceftaroline for 2 isolates at 0.5 × MIC. These results are in accordance with literature that supports synergistic combinations of daptomycin or vancomycin with ceftaroline for SA bacteremia. Daptomycin non-susceptible SA bacteremia presents a treatment challenge.

Cold Agglutinin Disease and Autoimmune Hemolytic Anemia with Pulmonary Embolism as a Presentation of COVID-19 Infection

BACKGROUND

Lymphopenia, thrombocytopenia, and elevated D-dimer and ferritin levels are frequently reported in patients with severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Here we report a case of cold agglutinin disease (CAD), autoimmune hemolytic anemia (AIHA), and pulmonary embolism as a presentation of COVID-19 infection.

CASE REPORT

A 51-year-old African-American woman presented to the emergency room with fever and shortness of breath. She was tachycardic, febrile, and had an oxygen saturation of 88% on room air. Laboratory studies showed hemoglobin (Hb) 5.1 g/dL, D-dimer 4.55 μg/mL, and C-reactive protein 12.3 mg/dL. Computed tomography scan of the chest showed acute pulmonary embolism involving the bilateral lower lobe segmental branches. Her influenza test was negative, but her SARS-CoV-2 test returned positive. Due to severe anemia, she was not started on any anticoagulation. Haptoglobin was low. Direct antiglobulin test returned positive for anticomplement and negative for anti-immunoglobulin G. Cold agglutinin titer was 80. Mycoplasma, Epstein-Barr virus, parvovirus, human immunodeficiency viruses, and acute hepatitis screen were negative. Abdominal and pelvic computed tomography showed a normal liver and spleen without lymphadenopathy. Peripheral blood smear showed red blood cell agglutination. On Day 2, she became hypoxic requiring 6 L oxygen. Since her Hb remained stable, she was started on low-intensity unfractionated heparin. Inflammatory markers subsequently improved and she was weaned off oxygen. Her Hb remained stable at 9 g/dL and she was discharged home. After 2 weeks, her Hb increased to 11 g/dL.

CONCLUSION

As exemplified in this case report, COVID-19 infection can lead to thromboembolism, CAD, and AIHA and it should be recognized as a potential etiology to such rare diseases.

Combatting resistant enterococcal infections: a pharmacotherapy review

INTRODUCTION

The role of enterococci in infectious diseases has evolved from a gut and urinary commensal to a major pathogen of concern. Few options exist for resistant enterococci, and appropriate use of the available agents is crucial.

AREAS COVERED

Herein, the authors discuss antibiotics with clinically useful activity against Enterococcus faecalis and E. faecium. The article specifically discusses: antibiotics active against enterococci and their mechanism of resistance, pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic principles, in vitro combinations, and clinical studies which focus on urinary tract, intra-abdominal, central nervous system, and bloodstream infections due to enterococci.

EXPERT OPINION

Aminopenicillins are preferred over all other agents when enterococci are susceptible and patients can tolerate them. Daptomycin and linezolid have demonstrated clinical efficacy against vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE). Synergistic combinations are often warranted in complex infections of high inoculum and biofilms while monotherapies are generally appropriate for uncomplicated infections. Although active against resistant enterococci, the pharmacokinetics, efficacy and safety of tigecycline and quinupristin/dalfopristin can problematical for severe infections. For cystitis, amoxicillin, nitrofurantoin, or fosfomycin are ideal. Recently, approved agents such as tedizolid and oritavancin have good in vitro activity against VRE but clinical studies against other resistant enterococci are lacking.

Daptomycin nonsusceptible vancomycin resistant Enterococcus bloodstream infections in patients with hematological malignancies: risk factors and outcomes

Daptomycin is typically the treatment of choice for vancomycin resistant Enterococcus (VRE) bloodstream infections (BSI) in patients with hematological malignancies, but increasingly daptomycin nonsusceptible VRE are being reported. We reviewed our experience with daptomycin nonsusceptible VRE BSI among patients with hematological malignancies. We compared risk factors and outcomes of 20 patients with daptomycin nonsusceptible VRE BSI (case patients) with 40 matched control patients with daptomycin susceptible VRE BSI. Case patients had more complications (6/20 vs. 2/40, p = .013); all-cause mortality was similar in both groups. By multivariable analysis, only prior daptomycin exposure within 90 days was significantly associated with daptomycin nonsusceptible VRE BSI (odds ratio 26.71; p < .0001). In 25% of case patients, all of whose VRE isolates had an initial minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of 4 μg/mL, nonsusceptibility developed during treatment, raising the question of whether higher doses of daptomycin should be used for VRE BSI in hematology patients.