Adjuvant platinum versus capecitabine for residual, invasive, triple-negative breast cancer: Patient-reported outcomes in ECOG-ACRIN EA1131

BACKGROUND

Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are a better tool for evaluating the experiences of patients who have symptomatic, treatment-associated adverse events (AEs) compared with clinician-rated AEs. The authors present PROs assessing health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and treatment-related neurotoxicity for adjuvant capecitabine versus platinum on the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group-American College of Radiology Imaging Network (ECOG-ACRIN) EA1131 trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT02445391).

METHODS

Participants completed the National Comprehensive Cancer Network Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast Cancer Symptom Index (NFBSI-16) and the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Gynecologic Oncology Group neurotoxicity subscale (platinum arm only) at baseline, cycle 3 day 1 (C3D1), 6 months, and 15 months. Because of early termination, power was insufficient to test the hypothesis that HRQoL, as assessed by the NFBSI-16 treatment side-effect (TSE) subscale, would be better at 6 and 15 months in the capecitabine arm; all analyses were exploratory. Means were compared by using t-tests or the Wilcoxon rank-sum test, and proportions were compared by using the χ2 test.

RESULTS

Two hundred ninety-six of 330 eligible patients provided PROs. The mean NFBSI-16 TSE subscale score was lower for the platinum arm at baseline (p = .02; absolute difference, 0.6 points) and for the capecitabine arm at C3D1 (p = .04; absolute difference, 0.5 points), but it did not differ at other times. The mean change in TSE subscale scores differed between the arms from baseline to C3D1 (platinum arm, 0.15; capecitabine arm, -0.72; p = .03), but not from baseline to later time points. The mean decline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Gynecologic Oncology Group neurotoxicity subscale scores exceeded the minimal meaningful change (1.38 points) from baseline to each subsequent time point (all p < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the similar frequency of clinician-rated AEs, PROs identified greater on-treatment symptom burden with capecitabine and complemented clinician-rated AEs by characterizing patients' experiences during chemotherapy.

A randomised phase II trial of a trivalent ganglioside vaccine targeting GM2, GD2 and GD3 combined with immunological adjuvant OPT-821 versus OPT-821 alone in metastatic sarcoma patients rendered disease-free by surgery

BACKGROUND

Recurrence after resection of metastatic sarcoma is common. The gangliosides GM2, GD2 and GD3 are strongly expressed across sarcoma subtypes. We hypothesised that generation of anti-ganglioside antibodies would control micrometastases and improve outcomes in sarcoma patients who were disease-free after metastasectomy.

METHODS

We conducted a randomised phase II trial of the immunological adjuvant OPT-821 with a KLH-conjugated ganglioside vaccine targeting GM2, GD2 and GD3, versus OPT-821 alone in patients with metastatic sarcoma following complete metastasectomy. Patients received 10 subcutaneous injections at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 8, 16, 28, 40, 52, 68 and 84 and were followed for evidence of recurrent disease. The primary end-point was relapse-free survival. Secondary end-points included overall survival and serologic response.

RESULTS

A total of 136 patients were randomised, 68 to each arm. The mean age was 51.2, 52.2% were male, 90.4% had relapsed disease, 86.8% had high-grade tumours and 14% had ≥4 metastases resected. Histologies included leiomyosarcoma (33%), spindle cell sarcoma (14%), undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (13%), osteosarcoma (10%), synovial sarcoma (9%), liposarcoma (9%) and others (12%). Most adverse events were Grade ≤2 (83.8% and 70.6% in the vaccine and adjuvant arms, respectively). The most common (≥20% of patients) were injection site reaction (89.7%), fatigue (44.1%) and pyrexia (27.9%) on the vaccine arm, and injection site reaction (69.1%) on the adjuvant only arm. The 1-year relapse-free survival rate (34.5% and 34.8% in the vaccine and OPT-821 monotherapy arm, respectively) did not differ between arms (P = 0.725). One-year overall survival rates were 93.1% and 91.5% in the vaccine and OPT-821 monotherapy arm, respectively (P = 0.578). Serologic responses at week 9 were more frequent on the vaccine arm (96.5% of patients) than in the adjuvant arm (32.8%), and the difference between groups was durable.

CONCLUSIONS

A sustained serologic response to vaccination was induced with the vaccine, but no difference in recurrence-free or overall survival was observed between treatment arms.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov identifier: NCT01141491.

Abstract P4-10-02: Patient-reported outcomes in EA1131: A randomized phase III trial of platinum vs. capecitabine in patients with residual triple-negative breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy

Background: Understanding health-related quality of life (HRQOL), including side effects, is critical to guide supportive care during chemotherapy. The EA1131 trial demonstrated that Platinum (Plat) was unlikely to improve outcomes compared to capecitabine (Cape) in patients with stage II-III triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) of basal subtype and ≥1 cm residual disease after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC), supporting Cape as the continued standard of care. Patient-reported outcomes (PRO) were administered as a sub-study to understand HRQOL and symptoms from the patient’s perspective. Methods: EA1131 was amended in 9/2017 to add PRO endpoints and all patients enrolled after this amendment were eligible for the PRO sub-study. The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast Cancer Symptom Index (FBSI) and the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy/Gynecologic Oncology Group Neurotoxicity Subscale (NtxS; Plat arm only) were administered at baseline (BL), cycle 3 day 1 (C3D1), and following treatment at 6 and 15 months. Due to early trial termination, the PRO sub-study target accrual (n=362) was not reached. It was hypothesized that HRQOL, assessed by the FBSI-Treatment Side Effect (TSE) subscale (range 0-16, higher score = less side effects, better HRQOL), would indicate fewer post-treatment side effects at 6 and 15 months following Plat compared to Cape. The Wilcoxon rank sum test was used to compare FBSI-TSE subscale scores and total FBSI scores (range 0-64, higher score = better overall HRQOL) between arms at BL, C3D1, 6 months and 15 months. Two-sample t-tests were used to compare change in FBSI-TSE subscale scores and total FBSI scores from BL to C3D1 between arms. Change in NtxS scores (range 0-44, higher score = less neurotoxicity) from BL to C3D1 was evaluated with the paired t-test. Analyses were exploratory and p-values &lt;0.05 considered significant without multiple comparisons adjustment. Results: Of 331 patients eligible for the PRO sub-study (156 Plat arm, 175 Cape arm), 296 (89.4%) completed ≥1 PRO. Mean FBSI-TSE subscale scores were better for Cape at BL (Cape 14.5, Plat 13.9, p-value 0.02), for Plat at C3D1 (Cape 13.5, Plat 14.0, p-value 0.04), and did not differ at 6 months (Cape 14.6, Plat 14.7, p-value 0.70) or 15 months (Cape 14.9, Plat 14.5, p-value 0.44). FBSI-TSE subscale scores worsened from BL to C3D1 for Cape but not for Plat (mean change Cape -0.72, mean change Plat 0.15, p-value 0.003). FBSI-TSE subscale change scores from BL to C3D1 exceeded the threshold for clinically meaningful worsening (&gt; 1.5 points) in 27% of patients on Cape and 23% of patients on Plat (p-value 0.51). Mean total FBSI scores did not differ between arms at any time (BL: Cape 50.6, Plat 49.7; C3D1: Cape 48.1, Plat 48.0; 6 months: Cape 49.9, Plat 51.1; 15 months: Cape 53.3, Plat 50.3; all p &gt; 0.05). Mean change in total FBSI scores from BL to C3D1 did not differ between arms (Cape -2.20, Plat -1.83, p = 0.75). Mean (standard deviation) NtxS scores for the Plat arm were 38 (6.3), 36.1 (7.8), 36 (7.1) and 34.5 (7.9) at BL, C3D1, 6 months and 15 months, respectively. Mean NtxS score decreased (indicating worsening neurotoxicity) from BL to C3D1 (p-value 0.006). Conclusions: Despite more frequent severe toxicity by CTCAE criteria for Plat than Cape, patient-reported side effects worsened during treatment with Cape but not Plat. Overall, changes in HRQOL were small for both arms and resolved after therapy. However approximately one-fourth of patients had clinically meaningful worsening side effects on both arms. PRO-assessed neurotoxicity increased in the Plat arm. This PRO sub-study demonstrates that PROs capture toxicities beyond CTCAE criteria and provides novel data about patients’ experience during adjuvant chemotherapy following NAC for TNBC.

Citation Format: Karen L Smith, Fengmin Zhao, Ingrid A Mayer, Amye J Tevaarwerk, Sofia F Garcia, Carlos L Arteaga, William F Symmans, Ben H Park, Brian L Burnette, Della F Makower, Margaret Block, Kimberly A Morley, Chirag R Jani, Craig Mescher, Shabana J Dewani, Ursa Brown-Glaberman, Lisa E Flaum, Erica L Mayer, William M Sikov, Eve T Rodler, Angela M DeMichele, Joseph A Sparano, Antonio C Wolff, Kathy D Miller, Lynne I Wagner. Patient-reported outcomes in EA1131: A randomized phase III trial of platinum vs. capecitabine in patients with residual triple-negative breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-10-02.

Randomized Phase III Postoperative Trial of Platinum-Based Chemotherapy Versus Capecitabine in Patients With Residual Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Following Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: ECOG-ACRIN EA1131

PURPOSE

Patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) and residual invasive disease (RD) after completion of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) have a high-risk for recurrence, which is reduced by adjuvant capecitabine. Preclinical models support the use of platinum agents in the TNBC basal subtype. The EA1131 trial hypothesized that invasive disease-free survival (iDFS) would not be inferior but improved in patients with basal subtype TNBC treated with adjuvant platinum compared with capecitabine.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with clinical stage II or III TNBC with ≥ 1 cm RD in the breast post-NAC were randomly assigned to receive platinum (carboplatin or cisplatin) once every 3 weeks for four cycles or capecitabine 14 out of 21 days every 3 weeks for six cycles. TNBC subtype (basal v nonbasal) was determined by PAM50 in the residual disease. A noninferiority design with superiority alternative was chosen, assuming a 4-year iDFS of 67% with capecitabine.

RESULTS

Four hundred ten of planned 775 participants were randomly assigned to platinum or capecitabine between 2015 and 2021. After median follow-up of 20 months and 120 iDFS events (61% of full information) in the 308 (78%) patients with basal subtype TNBC, the 3-year iDFS for platinum was 42% (95% CI, 30 to 53) versus 49% (95% CI, 39 to 59) for capecitabine. Grade 3 and 4 toxicities were more common with platinum agents. The Data and Safety Monitoring Committee recommended stopping the trial as it was unlikely that further follow-up would show noninferiority or superiority of platinum.

CONCLUSION

Platinum agents do not improve outcomes in patients with basal subtype TNBC RD post-NAC and are associated with more severe toxicity when compared with capecitabine. Participants had a lower than expected 3-year iDFS regardless of study treatment, highlighting the need for better therapies in this high-risk population.

A randomized phase III post-operative trial of platinum-based chemotherapy (P) versus capecitabine (C) in patients (pts) with residual triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) following neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC): ECOG-ACRIN EA1131

605

Background: Pts with TNBC who have residual invasive disease (RD) after completion of NAC have a very high risk for recurrence, which is reduced by adjuvant capecitabine (C). Pre-clinical models support the use of platinum agents (P) in the TNBC basal subtype. EA1131 tested the hypothesis that invasive disease-free survival (iDFS) would not be inferior but improved in pts with basal subtype TNBC after NAC with the adjuvant use of a P instead of C (primary objective). Methods: Pts with clinical stage II/III TNBC post neoadjuvant taxane +/- anthracycline-based chemotherapy with at least 1 cm RD in the surgical specimen were randomized (1:1) to receive P (carboplatin or cisplatin once every 3 weeks for 4 cycles) or C (14/7d every 3 weeks for 6 cycles). TNBC subtype (basal vs. non-basal) was analyzed in the surgical specimen by PAM50. A non-inferiority design (non-inferiority margin of hazard ratio [HR] of 1.154) with superiority alternative (alternative HR of 0.754) was chosen, assuming a 4-year iDFS of 67% for the C arm. Non-inferiority was tested first. If non-inferiority was shown, a formal test for superiority of P compared to C would be conducted. Results: 401 participants were randomized to P or C between 2015 and 2020 (recruitment goal, 775), 310 (77%) had TNBC basal subtype disease (primary analysis population). Pts’ median age was 52 years, 71% were White and 19% Black. At diagnosis, most tumors were high grade (78%), T2 (59%), 47% N0, and 40% N1. Residual tumors were 37% ypT1, 44% ypT2, and 47% ypN0. Overall incidence of any toxicity was similar (83% with P, 80% with C), but grade 3 and 4 toxicities (no grade 5) were more common with P (25% vs 15%). After median follow-up of 18 months, 113 iDFS events (58% of full information) had occurred. 3-year iDFS for P arm was 40% (95%CI, 29%-51%) and 44% (95%CI, 32%-55%) for C arm. The HR for arms P/C was 1.09 (95% Repeated Confidence Interval, 0.62-1.90) and the probability of eventually rejecting the null of inferiority (i.e., conditional power) was 6%. The Data Safety and Monitoring Committee recommended stopping the trial at the 5th interim analysis in March 2021 since it was unlikely that the trial would be able to show non-inferiority or superiority of the P arm. Conclusions: Participants with TNBC with RD after NAC had a lower than expected 3-year iDFS regardless of study treatment. Available data show that it is very unlikely that the study would be able to establish non-inferiority of P to C. In addition, severe toxicities were more common with P. In pts with TNBC, particularly basal subtype, with at least 1 cm RD after NAC and high-risk of recurrence, adjuvant P use does not improve outcomes. Correlative analyses of RD tissue (NGS), circulating markers (ctDNA and CTC pre/post treatment), and patient-reported outcomes (PRO) questionnaires will now occur. Clinical trial information: NCT02445391.

Clinical benefit of antiangiogenic therapy in advanced and metastatic chondrosarcoma

Chondrosarcoma is the most common bone sarcoma in adults. Conventional chondrosarcoma, the commonest histological subtype, is largely resistant to anthracycline-based chemotherapy. There have been anecdotal reports of durable clinical benefit with antiangiogenic agents in this disease. A retrospective search of patients treated at three sarcoma referral centers was performed to identify patients with advanced chondrosarcoma treated with antiangiogenic agents. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of antiangiogenic agents in advanced chondrosarcoma. Ten patients were identified; seven with conventional, one each with clear cell, extraskeletal mesenchymal chondrosarcoma and extraskeletal myxoid chondrosarcoma. The median progression-free survival for patients with conventional and clear cell sarcoma was 22.6 months. Median overall survival has not been met. Antiangiogenic therapy was well tolerated in this series of patients. Our retrospective data suggest that antiangiogenic therapy can provide prolonged clinical benefit in advanced chondrosarcoma patients. Further prospective trials are required to precisely define the role of this class of agent in advanced chondrosarcoma.

Abstract P4-22-11: Combined targeted therapies for advanced triple negative breast cancer: A phase II trial of nab-paclitaxel and bevacizumab followed by maintenance targeted therapy with bevacizumab and erlotinib

Background: Chemotherapy remains the mainstay of therapy for patients with metastatic triple negative breast cancer (TNBC). We hypothesized that the addition of biologic agents targeting key pathways (bevacizumab targeting angiogenesis and erlotinib directed against EGFR) may prolong progression free survival (PFS) and offer a novel treatment strategy free from chemotherapy for patients with metastatic TNBC.

Methods: Patients with TNBC receiving initial therapy for metastatic disease were eligible for this multicenter phase II trial (NCT00733408) conducted at an academic center and affiliated, community practice sites. Induction therapy included nab-paclitaxel 100 mg/m2 IV Qweek (wk) and Bevacizumab 10 mg/kg IV Q2wks x 24 weeks. Patients free of progression at 24 wks began maintenance therapy with bevacizumab 10 mg/kg IV Q2wks and erlotinib 150 mg po daily until progression with radiographic assessment every 8 wks. Primary objective was PFS with secondary objectives of response rate, overall survival (OS) and safety. All eligible patients were included in the analysis of PFS and OS. Response was evaluated among patients with measurable disease by RECIST 1.1 with central review. Patients with inadequate disease assessments were coded as non-responders. Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate PFS and OS with patients censored at date of last tumor assessment (PFS) or date of last follow up (OS).

Results: From April 2009 – December 2015, 58 patients (median age 54, range 33-83) were enrolled; 56 (97%) had measurable disease, and all had metastatic TNBC by local assessment. 33 (57%) patients completed induction; 22 (38%) came off study during induction; 3 (5%) continue on maintenance therapy. 4 patients discontinued therapy prior to first assessment. As of June 8, 2016, 53 patients (91%) have progressed. Median follow up for surviving patients is 14.5 months (range 4.1-65.4). Median PFS is 7.7 months (95% CI 5.7, 9.5). Of 56 patients with measurable disease, 38 (66%) had partial response (PR); 10 (17%) with stable disease for clinical benefit rate (CBR) of 86%. Median OS is 18.2 months (95% CI 16.3, 24.5). Most common grade 3-4 toxicities during induction were neutropenia [17 (29%), 1 grade 4], fatigue [13 (22%), all grade 3], leukopenia [7 (12%), all grade 3], and neuropathy [7 (12%), all grade 3]. Rash was most common ≥ grade 3 toxicity during maintenance [4 (7%), grade 3]. One patient experienced clinical CHF during maintenance month 16 requiring bevacizumab discontinuation. Conclusions: Nab-paclitaxel and bevacizumab followed by maintenance targeted therapy with bevacizumab and erlotinib was well tolerated. While the observed PFS did not meet pre-specified criteria of interest, the majority of patients experienced clinical benefit (86%) with 30 (57%) receiving maintenance targeted therapy. Correlative studies are ongoing. Supported by Genentech (OSI4266s), Celegene (AX-CL-BRST-PI-003828) and Janssen.

Citation Format: Specht JM, Gadi VK, Gralow JR, Korde LA, Linden HM, Salazar LG, Rodler ET, Cundy A, Buening BJ, Baker KK, Redman MW, Kurland BF, Garrison MA, Smith JC, vanHaelst C, Anderson JE. Combined targeted therapies for advanced triple negative breast cancer: A phase II trial of nab-paclitaxel and bevacizumab followed by maintenance targeted therapy with bevacizumab and erlotinib [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2016 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2016 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-22-11.

Phase I Study of Veliparib (ABT-888) Combined with Cisplatin and Vinorelbine in Advanced Triple-Negative Breast Cancer and/or BRCA Mutation-Associated Breast Cancer

PURPOSE

Cisplatin is synergistic with vinorelbine and the PARP inhibitor veliparib, and has antineoplastic activity in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) and BRCA mutation-associated breast cancer. This phase I study assessed veliparib with cisplatin and vinorelbine.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

A 3+3 dose-escalation design evaluated veliparib administered twice daily for 14 days with cisplatin (75 mg/m(2) day 1) and vinorelbine (25 mg/m(2) days 1, 8) every 21 days, for 6 to 10 cycles, followed by veliparib monotherapy. Pharmacokinetics, measurement of poly(ADP-ribose) in peripheral blood mononuclear cells, and preliminary efficacy were assessed. IHC and gene-expression profiling were evaluated as potential predictors of response.

RESULTS

Forty-five patients enrolled in nine dose cohorts plus five in an expansion cohort at the highest dose level and recommended phase II dose, 300 mg twice daily. The MTD of veliparib was not reached. Neutropenia (36%), anemia (30%), and thrombocytopenia (12%) were the most common grade 3/4 adverse events. Best overall response for 48 patients was radiologic response with 9-week confirmation for 17 (35%; 2 complete, 15 partial), and stable disease for 21 (44%). Germline BRCA mutation presence versus absence was associated with 6-month progression-free survival [PFS; 10 of 14 (71%) vs. 8 of 27 (30%), mid-P = 0.01]. Median PFS for all 50 patients was 5.5 months (95% confidence interval, 4.1-6.7).

CONCLUSIONS

Veliparib at 300 mg twice daily combined with cisplatin and vinorelbine is well tolerated with encouraging response rates. A phase II randomized trial is planned to assess veliparib's contribution to cisplatin chemotherapy in metastatic TNBC and BRCA mutation-associated breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res; 22(12); 2855-64. ©2016 AACR.

Phase I trial of preoperative chemoradiation plus sorafenib for high-risk extremity soft tissue sarcomas with dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI correlates

PURPOSE

We conducted a phase I trial of the addition of sorafenib to a chemoradiotherapy regimen in patients with high-risk (intermediate/high grade, >5 cm) extremity soft tissue sarcoma undergoing limb salvage surgery. We conducted a correlative study of quantitative dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) to assess response to treatment.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Patients were treated at increasing dose levels of sorafenib (200 mg daily, 400 mg daily, 400 mg twice daily) initiated 14 days before three preoperative and three postoperative cycles of epirubicin/ifosfamide. Radiation (28 Gy) was administered during cycle 2 with epirubicin omitted. The primary objective was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of sorafenib. DCE-MRI was conducted at baseline, after 2 weeks of sorafenib, and before surgery. The imaging data were subjected to quantitative pharmacokinetic analyses.

RESULTS

Eighteen subjects were enrolled, of which 16 were evaluable. The MTD of sorafenib was 400 mg daily. Common grade 3-4 adverse events included neutropenia (94%), hypophosphatemia (75%), anemia (69%), thrombocytopenia (50%), and neutropenic fever/infection (50%). Of note, 38% developed wound complications requiring surgical intervention. The rate of ≥95% histopathologic tumor necrosis was 44%. Changes in DCE-MRI biomarker ΔK(trans) after 2 weeks of sorafenib correlated with histologic response (R(2) = 0.67, P = 0.012) at surgery.

CONCLUSION

The addition of sorafenib to preoperative chemoradiotherapy is feasible and warrants further investigation in a larger trial. DCE-MRI detected changes in tumor perfusion after 2 weeks of sorafenib and may be a minimally invasive tool for rapid assessment of drug effect in soft tissue sarcoma.

Outcome of leiomyosarcoma of bone: A single center experience

e21502

Background: Leiomyosarcoma (LMS) of bone is a very rare sarcoma subtype. These tumors are managed akin to osteosarcoma, with neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery. The precise role of chemotherapy remains to be defined. Methods: Patients treated with primary bone LMS at the University of Washington between 2002 and 2012 were included. Patients with high grade tumors were treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and surgery; whereas those with low grade tumors were treated with surgical resection alone. Chemotherapy consisted of doxorubicin and ifosfamide x 2 cycles. Treatment details included: initial treatment (surgery versus chemo), surgical and pathological margins, and timing of chemotherapy. Follow-up data included: time to local recurrence, time to metastasis, time to last follow up if alive, or time to death. Results: Ten patients were identified, 4 male and 6 female. Median age at diagnosis: 52 years (range 29 - 91). The primary site was the distal femur in 5 patients, and the hemipelvis, acetabulum, proximal femur, distal clavicle and mid-shaft of femur in 1 patient each. Median tumor size at diagnosis was 8 cm. Five were high-grade tumors; 3 were intermediate and 2 were low grade. Four of 10 patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy, with the following histological response; 70%, 30%, 15% and <5%. None of these patients had a dimensional radiological response to chemotherapy. Of the patients treated with surgery alone, one developed a local recurrence and another developed metastatic disease. Of the patients treated with chemotherapy and surgery, 1 died from an unrelated cause. Median follow-up was 9 months (range 0 - 83). Median DFS was 9 months (range 0 - 83). OS has not yet been reached. Conclusions: Surgical resection remains the mainstay of management of LMS of bone. The role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy requires further evaluation. Larger collaborative studies and biomarker analyses are essential to evaluate optimal treatment strategies for this rare disease.

A randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, multi-institutional, cross-over, phase II.5 study of saracatinib (AZD0530), a selective Src kinase inhibitor, in patients with recurrent osteosarcoma localized to the lung

TPS10591

Background: Osteosarcoma is a rare cancer and 33% of patients who have completed primary treatment will recur. The Src pathway has been implicated in the metastatic behavior of several tumors including osteosarcoma where 95% of samples express Src or have evidence of downstream activation of this pathway. Saracatinib (AZD0530) is a potent and selective Src kinase inhibitor. The recommended phase II dose in adults was found to be 175mg daily. The primary goal of this study is to determine if treatment with Saracatinib can increase progression free survival (PFS) for patients who have undergone complete resection of metastatic osteosarcoma nodules in the lung. Secondary goals are evaluation of overall survival, time to treatment failure, and evaluation of several biological correlatives. Methods: This is a multi-institutional, phase II.5, placebo-controlled study with an accrual goals of 88 randomized patients. Patients between 15 and 75 years, with histological confirmation of recurrent osteosarcoma, localized to the lung, who have potential for complete surgical resection, are eligible for enrollment. After complete resection, patients are randomized to treatment with saracatinib or placebo, of a daily oral dose of 175 mg, continuously for up to 1 year or until progression. Patients who recur in the lung while on-study and who are amenable to complete surgical resection will be un-blinded. Those patients who received placebo may have the option to undergo surgical resection. If fully resected, they will be offered therapy with saracatinib under the same treatment guidelines as above. As of January 2013, 38 patients have enrolled and 32 patients met the criteria to be randomized and began oral therapy with either saracatinib or placebo. An interim analysis is planned after 40 patients have been randomized. Clinical trial information: NCT00752206.

SARC006: Phase II trial of chemotherapy in sporadic and neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1)-associated high-grade malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors (MPNSTs)

10522

Background: MPNSTs occur in 10% of the NF1 population, and retrospective, pooled analyses have reported worse chemotherapy response for NF1 (9-18%) compared to sporadic MPNSTs (39-55%). Methods: We prospectively evaluated the objective response (OR) rate, [complete responses (CR) and partial responses (PR) WHO criteria] of children and adults with high-grade, unresectable or metastatic chemotherapy naive NF1 associated versus sporadic MPNST after 2 cycles of ifosfamide and doxorubicin (IA) followed by 2 cycles of ifosfamide and etoposide (IE) as primary endpoint. This was followed by surgery and/or radiation for local control and up to 2 more cycles of IA and IE each. Pathology was centrally confirmed. A Simon optimal two-stage design was used with a target response rate of 40% and 17 patients per stratum in the first stage. With 4+/17 ORs, enrollment was to be expanded to 37 patients per stratum, and 11+/37 ORs would be potentially consistent with a 40% OR rate. Results: Both initial stages met criteria for enrollment expansion with 4/17 PRs in NF1 and 4/12 PRs in sporadic MPNSTs, but only 1 additional PR was observed in the expanded NF1 stratum. Of the 9 PRs, 5 were first observed after 2 cycles IA, and additional 4 after 2 cycles IE. Enrollment was slower than expected and the trial was closed before full accrual. Conclusions: While the primary trial objective was not reached due to slow enrollment, with only 5/29 ORs in the NF1 stratum the desired OR rate of 11+/37 would have unlikely been met even if accrual had been completed. We observed a lower OR rate in NF1 compared to sporadic MPNSTs similar to retrospective literature reports. However, our trial was not powered to detect a difference in response rates between the two strata. In addition to PRs after both IA and IE, disease stabilization was achieved in most patients. Novel strategies including the evaluation of targeted agents in combination with chemotherapy should be considered. Clinical trial information: NCT00304083. [Table: see text]

A phase II study evaluating the safety and efficacy of sunitinib with weekly paclitaxel followed by doxorubicin and daily oral cyclophosphamide plus G-CSF as neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NC) for locally advanced (LABC) or inflammatory breast cancer (IBC)

1090

Background: Sunitinib (S) is an oral tyrosine kinase inhibitor with anti-tumor and anti-angiogenic activity. The primary objective of this trial was to assess the pathologic complete response rate (pCR) in patients (pts) treated with NC consisting of S with weekly paclitaxel (T) followed by doxorubicin and daily oral cyclophosphamide plus G-CSF (AC+G-CSF). Correlative studies including circulating biomarkers are reported separately. Methods: Pts with HER2 negative LABC or IBC were eligible for this multicenter, phase II trial. Pts received S 25 mg po daily with T 80 mg/m2 IV Qweek (wk) x 12 wks, then AC+G-CSF (doxorubicin 24 mg/m2 IV Qwk + oral cyclophosphamide 60 mg/m2po daily + G-CSF 5 mcg/kg SC days 2-7) x 15 wks. pCR in the breast and axilla was assessed at surgery, and the MDACC CPS+EG score (validated score combining clinical and pathologic results for predicting survival in the neoadjuvant setting) was calculated. Results: 70 pts (ages 33-79) were enrolled; 68 received protocol therapy. 37 (53%) had ER and/or PR positive tumors. 2 patients were unevaluable (hypersensitivity to T, toxicity possibly related to S) and 3 withdrew consent prior to surgery. 61 pts reported any grade AE in S+P period. Among grade 3 or 4 AEs, neutropenia was most common in S+P period occurring in 31/68 (46%). pCR in the breast was observed in 27% (17/63, 95% CI 17%-40%) and breast and axilla in 15/63 (24%). In pts with ER positive tumors, pCR rate in breast was 8/34 (24%) and 9/29 (31%) for pts with ER negative tumors. 18 evaluable pts (29%) had CPS+EG scores ≤2, 40 (63%) had CPS+EG scores of ≥3, and 5 had insufficient information to calculate the CPS+EG score. When response was defined as pCR and/or CPS+EG score ≤ 2, 28 pts (44%) were responders. Conclusions: NC with T+S followed by AC+G-CSF was well tolerated. Using a combined definition of response of pCR and/or CPS+EG score ≤2, 28/63 (44%) pts had response; 19/34 (56%) for ER positive and 9/29 (31%) for ER negative disease. The addition of S to NC may result in promising incremental benefit for pts with ER positive breast cancer. Clinical trial information: NCT00513695.

Systemic therapy in primary angiosarcoma of the spleen

Primary splenic angiosarcoma is a very rare neoplasm with a high propensity for metastatic disease and poor prognosis. There is a paucity of literature concerning this specific sarcoma subtype and the role of systemic therapy is not well defined. A retrospective review of the prospectively maintained University of Washington/Seattle Cancer Care Alliance Sarcoma Unit database was performed to identify patients with splenic angiosarcoma treated between 2007 and 2012. In total there were 19 patients with angiosarcoma treated at the Seattle Cancer Care Alliance from 2007 to 2012. The number of patients with splenic angiosarcoma was 2 (11%). The first patient was a woman aged 57 years who was referred with metastatic splenic angiosarcoma to the liver, post-splenectomy. She was treated with 4 cycles of weekly paclitaxel prior to metastatic resection and 4 cycles of the same drug in an adjuvant scenario, achieving a pathological complete response to treatment. She is alive and on third-line systemic therapy. The second patient was a male patient aged 30 years who presented with metastatic high-grade splenic angiosarcoma and was treated with 3 lines of systemic therapy, including doxorubicin, paclitaxel and gemcitabine+docetaxel, but developed a gastrointestinal metastasis with subsequent gastrointestinal bleeding. Splenic angiosarcoma is a very rare neoplasm. Surgery remains the mainstay of management for localized disease. Paclitaxel administered weekly proved to be well-tolerated and resulted in a good radiological response in one of our patients, enabling resection of metastatic disease. Durable clinical benefit can be achieved in metastatic splenic angiosarcoma with multi modality management.

Feasibility study of FDG PET as an indicator of early response to aromatase inhibitors and trastuzumab in a heterogeneous group of breast cancer patients

BACKGROUND

In breast cancer endocrine therapy, post-therapy Ki-67 assay of biopsy material predicts recurrence-free survival but is invasive and prone to sampling error. [18F]Fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) has shown an early agonist or 'flare' response to tamoxifen and estradiol, but has not been tested in response to estrogen-lowering aromatase inhibitors (AIs). We hypothesized that decreased agonistic response to AIs would result in early FDG uptake decline. We also measured early response to trastuzumab (T), another targeted agent for breast cancer with differing mechanisms of action. Our study was designed to test for an early decline in FDG uptake in response to AI or T and to examine association with Ki-67 measures of early response.

METHODS

Patients with any stage of newly diagnosed or recurrent breast cancer were eligible and enrolled prior to initiation (or resumption) of AI or T therapy. FDG PET and tissue biopsy were planned before and after 2 weeks of AI or T therapy, with pretreatment archival tissue permitted. Cutoffs of ≥20% decline in standardized uptake value (SUV) as FDG PET early response and ≤5% post-treatment expression as Ki-67 early response were defined prior to analysis.

RESULTS

Forty-two patients enrolled, and 40 (28 AI, 12 T) completed serial FDG-PET imaging. Twenty-two patients (17 AI, 5 T) had newly diagnosed disease, and 23 (14 AI, 9 T) had metastatic disease (5 newly diagnosed). Post-treatment biopsy was performed in 25 patients (63%) and was either refused or not feasible in 15. Post-treatment biopsy yielded tumor in only 17/25 cases (14 AI, 3 T). Eleven of 14 AI patients with post-therapy tissue showed FDG PET early response, and there was 100% concordance of PET and post-therapy Ki-67 early response. For the T group, 6/12 showed an FDG PET early response, including 2/3 patients with post-therapy biopsy, all with Ki-67 >5%.

CONCLUSIONS

Substantial changes in FDG PET SUV occurred over 2 weeks of AI therapy and were associated with low post-therapy proliferation. SUV decline was seen in response to T, but few tissue samples were available to test association with Ki-67. Our results support further investigation of FDG PET as a biomarker for early response to AI therapy.

Phase I study of neoadjuvant chemoradiation (CRT) plus sorafenib (S) for high-risk extremity soft tissue sarcomas (STS)

10011^

Background: We previously reported a regimen of epirubicin/ifosfamide (E/I) and hypofractionated radiation (RT) followed by surgery and postoperative E/I. We hypothesize that S + CRT is safe and augments activity through anti-angiogenic mechanisms. We performed dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI using shutter speed pharmacokinetic analysis (SSM DCE-MRI) to assess preoperative therapy effect. Methods: Subjects with >5 cm, grade 2-3 extremity STS were treated in cohorts of escalating S dose using a 3+3 design based on dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) during the first 8 weeks. Daily S was initiated 14 days prior to E/I (E 30 mg/m2/day days 1-3 and I 2.5 g/m2/day days 1-3 every 21 days for 3 pre- and 3 postoperative cycles). 28 Gy preoperative RT was administered in 8 fractions during cycle 2 (E omitted). Primary objective was to determine maximum tolerated dose (MTD). DCE-MRI was performed at baseline, after 2 weeks S, and prior to surgery. Results: 16 subjects were enrolled. Histologies included pleomorphic (5), synovial (5), liposarcoma (3), other (3). All were extremity (12 lower, 4 upper) tumors. Median tumor size was 11.7 cm. The MTD of S was 400 mg daily (see table). Most common grade 3/4 adverse events among all dose levels were neutropenia (94%), anemia (75%), hypophosphatemia (69%), thrombocytopenia (56%), neutropenic fever/infection (50%), and hypokalemia (31%). 38% developed wound complications requiring surgical intervention including amputation in 1 subject. 44% had >95% histologic necrosis at surgery. No subjects have recurred with median follow-up of 15 (6-27) months. 8 subjects underwent DCE-MRI. Changes in SSM DCE-MRI biomarkers after 2 weeks S correlated with histologic response (R2=0.71). Conclusions: The addition of S to CRT is feasible with promising activity that warrants further investigation. Rate of wound complications is similar to other reports of preoperative radiation. SSM DCE-MRI detected changes in tumor perfusion after only 2 weeks of S and may prove useful to assess early drug effect in STS. [Table: see text]

Randomized multicenter double-blind phase II trial: The immunological adjuvant OPT-821 with or without a trivalent ganglioside vaccine in metastatic sarcoma patients following metastasectomy

TPS10103

Background: The gangliosides GM2, GD2, and GD3 are strongly expressed in sarcoma and represent novel antitumor targets. We have demonstrated the safety and immunogenicity of individual monovalent ganglioside conjugate vaccines when administered with OPT821, a synthetic saponin adjuvant that augments the T-cell response. Antitumor effects are observed with anti-ganglioside antibodies in preclinical models, with greatest benefit seen in the micrometastatic setting. Patients (pts) with metastatic sarcoma rendered disease-free by surgery are at high risk for disease recurrence, with no therapy demonstrated to improve outcomes. Therefore, this population is ideally suited to test the efficacy of vaccine induced anti-ganglioside antibodies. We thus initiated this randomized double-blind phase II study of OPT821 with or without a trivalent ganglioside vaccine composed of GM2, GD2 lactone and GD3 lactone conjugated to KLH, an immunogenic carrier protein. Methods: A total of 134 pts will be randomized on a 1:1 basis stratified by disease state (relapsed disease vs metastasis at time of diagnosis), disease-free interval and number of relapses. Key inclusion criteria include stage IV sarcoma (locoregional recurrence is not sufficient) rendered disease-free following surgery or multi-modality therapy, no more than 8 weeks since surgery, and no continuous use of anti-inflammatory medications. Pts with Ewings sarcoma, GIST and rhabdomyosarcoma (except pleomorphic/anaplastic) are ineligible. Eligible pts will receive 10 subcutaneous injections in the outpatient setting over 84 weeks. The primary endpoint is progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary objectives include overall survival (OS) and 1- and 3-year PFS rate. Exploratory objectives include correlation of serologic response to outcome, comparison of tumor ganglioside expression at baseline and at recurrence, and analysis of circulating tumor cells. Enrollment began in July 2010. As of January 1, 2012, 83 patients had been recruited from 12 participating sites. Clinicaltrials.gov#: NCT01141491. Funded by Mabvax Therapeutics and NIH (R21CA13386).

P1-17-04: Phase I Study of PARP Inhibitor ABT-888 (Veliparib) in Combination with Cisplatin and Vinorelbine for Patients with Advanced Triple Negative Breast Cancer and/or BRCA-Mutation Associated Breast Cancer

Background: Inhibitors of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) have shown preclinical and clinical activity in targeting tumors with pre-existing DNA repair defects, in particular BRCA1 and BRCA2 deficient tumors. Cisplatin (CP) has demonstrated synergy with ABT-888 (veliparib) in breast cancer xenograft models and has anti-tumor activity in triple negative (TN) and BRCA-1 deficient breast cancer. Vinorelbine (V) combined with CP has shown safety and efficacy in patients with pretreated metastatic breast cancer.

Methods: We are conducting a phase I study to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic profiles (PD), and preliminary anti-tumor activity of veliparib in combination with CP and V in patients (pts) with metastatic breast cancer who are either TN or who have BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation associated breast cancer. Cohorts receive escalating doses of ABT-888 orally BID days 1–14, CP 75 mg/m2 intravenously (IV) day 1 and V 25 mg/m2 IV days 1,8 every 21 days, in a 3+3 design.

Results: As of 6/14/11, 18 eligible female pts have been enrolled. The median age at registration was 50 years (range 34–78 years). Sixteen pts received at least one prior metastatic regimen (range 0–8). Three pts had previously treated brain metastases. BRCA mutation status was as follows: BRCA1+ (3 pts); BRCA2+ (2 pts); confirmed mutation negative (8 pts); unknown (5 pts). Four pts received the 20 mg BID veliparib dose (one patient in the cohort died of progressive disease early in cycle 1 and was replaced), 3 received 30 mg BID, 6 received 40 mg BID, and 5 have been enrolled at dose level 4 (60 mg BID). Dose limiting toxicities occurred in one patient at the 40 mg BID dose (grade 4 thrombocytopenia), and one patient at the 60 mg BID dose (grade 3 neutropenic fever). Adverse events are typical for a platinum-based chemotherapy regimen and include nausea, fatigue, thrombocytopenia, and neutropenia. MTD has not been reached. Of 11 pts evaluable for radiographic response to date, 6 (55%) had a PR (3 of whom have a BRCA mutation) and 5 (45%) had stable disease. Correlative studies will use immunohistochemistry and gene expression array to evaluate the profile of TN breast cancer and predictors of response to treatment.

Conclusion: Veliparib in combination with CP and V has been generally well tolerated to date. Objective anti-tumor activity was seen in BRCA mutation carriers and in pts with sporadic TN breast cancer. PK, PD, and biomarker analysis is underway. Enrollment continues in the dose escalation cohorts.

Citation Information: Cancer Res 2011;71(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-17-04.

P2-09-09: Dynamic FDG PET and DCE-MRI To Assess Tumor Metabolism and Blood Flow in Response to Neoadjuvant Sunitinib and Paclitaxel Followed by AC + G-CSF in Patients with Locally-Advanced (LABC) and/or Inflammatory Breast Cancer (IBC)

Background

Kinetic analysis of FDG PET and DCE-MRI can identify patterns of breast tumor metabolism and perfusion that predict pathologic response, relapse, and survival in patients (pts) receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NC). We are enrolling pts with LABC or IBC on a phase II trial of neoadjuvant sunitinib and metronomic chemotherapy. The addition of sunitinib, a tyrosine kinase inhibitor of VEGFR1-3, PDGFR, c-KIT, to NC is hypothesized to increase rate of pathologic complete response (pCR). Assessment of FDG PET measures of glucose metabolism (Ki), glucose delivery (K1) which approximates blood flow, and MRI measures of blood flow and vascularity (peak enhancement (PE), signal enhancement ratio (SER), and volume) during NC offers the opportunity to evaluate the in vivo pharmacodynamics of sunitinib.

Methods: Pts with HER2−negative LABC or IBC participated in a companion imaging trial with [18F]-FDG PET and DCE-MRI before NC (T0), after a 1 wk run-in of sunitinib 25 mg po daily (T1), after 12 wks of paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 IV Qwk and sunitinib 25 mg po daily (T2), and prior to breast surgery (T3) after 15 wks of doxorubicin 24 mg/m2 IV Qwk, cyclophosphamide 60 mg/m2 po daily with G-CSF 5 mcg/kg SC days 2–6 each wk. FDG metabolic rate (Ki), glucose delivery (K1), and MR indices (PE, SER, volume) were assessed. Imaging parameters were compared for groups defined by NC pathologic complete response (pCR) vs. non-pCR using a two-sample t-test.

Results: The imaging trial included 14 pts. Median age was 50 years (43-79). All had HER2−negative LABC (n=13, 93%) or IBC (n=1, 7%). Most tumors were ductal (n=12, 86%) and high grade (n=9, 64%). Seven (50%) tumors were ER negative. pCR was observed in 4/14 (29%) pts in this cohort. Changes in Ki, K1, and MRI volume were observed between baseline (T0) and the sunitinib run-in (T1). For example, 8/14 (57%) had a decrease in K1 of &gt;20%, and 3 (21%) had an increase of ≥20%. These 1 week changes did not predict subsequent response to NC. However, declines in Ki and K1 between baseline (T0) and following sunitinib and paclitaxel (T2) did predict pCR. The average change in glucose metabolism (Ki) was a 95% decline with pCR and a 68% decline otherwise (p= 0.007). The average T0-T2 K1 change was 83% decline for pts with pCR and 47% decline otherwise (p= 0.029). In contrast to our previous studies in LABC pts treated with NC where decline in K1 was predictive of response, decline in Ki appears to be the more robust predictor of response in this cohort. Of 11 pts with PET scans at T2 and T3, 5 showed marked increase (&gt;20%) in Ki and 6 showed marked increase in K1 after withdrawal of sunitinib.

Conclusion: Changes in breast tumor glucose metabolism (Ki), glucose delivery (K1), and blood flow (MR PE, SER, volume) can be detected after 1 wk of sunitinib, but are not predictive of response to NC. In the setting of anti-vascular therapy, measures of tumor glucose metabolism (Ki) are predictive and perhaps, more predictive of outcome than measures of glucose delivery (K1) which may be altered by sunitinib.

Citation Information: Cancer Res 2011;71(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-09-09.

(18)F-FDG PET in sarcoma treatment response imaging

Sarcomas are a biologically complex group of diseases that exhibit variable responses to single or combination therapy. (18)F-FDG PET imaging contributes to sarcoma treatment response assessment as an objective semiquantitative biomarker of response. In this review, background and experience in (18)F-FDG PET as a biomarker that successfully identifies tumor response is assessed.