Artificial intelligence-enhanced electrocardiography for accurate diagnosis and management of cardiovascular diseases

Electrocardiography (ECG), improved by artificial intelligence (AI), has become a potential technique for the precise diagnosis and treatment of cardiovascular disorders. The conventional ECG is a frequently used, inexpensive, and easily accessible test that offers important information about the physiological and anatomical state of the heart. However, the ECG can be interpreted differently by humans depending on the interpreter's level of training and experience, which could make diagnosis more difficult. Using AI, especially deep learning convolutional neural networks (CNNs), to look at single, continuous, and intermittent ECG leads that has led to fully automated AI models that can interpret the ECG like a human, possibly more accurately and consistently. These AI algorithms are effective non-invasive biomarkers for cardiovascular illnesses because they can identify subtle patterns and signals in the ECG that may not be readily apparent to human interpreters. The use of AI in ECG analysis has several benefits, including the quick and precise detection of problems like arrhythmias, silent cardiac illnesses, and left ventricular failure. It has the potential to help doctors with interpretation, diagnosis, risk assessment, and illness management. Aside from that, AI-enhanced ECGs have been demonstrated to boost the identification of heart failure and other cardiovascular disorders, particularly in emergency department settings, allowing for quicker and more precise treatment options. The use of AI in cardiology, however, has several limitations and obstacles, despite its potential. The effective implementation of AI-powered ECG analysis is limited by issues such as systematic bias. Biases based on age, gender, and race result from unbalanced datasets. A model's performance is impacted when diverse demographics are inadequately represented. Potentially disregarded age-related ECG variations may result from skewed age data in training sets. ECG patterns are affected by physiological differences between the sexes; a dataset that is inclined toward one sex may compromise the accuracy of the others. Genetic variations influence ECG readings, so racial diversity in datasets is significant. Furthermore, issues such as inadequate generalization, regulatory barriers, and interpretability concerns contribute to deployment difficulties. The lack of robustness in models when applied to disparate populations frequently hinders their practical applicability. The exhaustive validation required by regulatory requirements causes a delay in deployment. Difficult models that are not interpretable erode the confidence of clinicians. Diverse dataset curation, bias mitigation strategies, continuous validation across populations, and collaborative efforts for regulatory approval are essential for the successful deployment of AI ECG in clinical settings and must be undertaken to address these issues. To guarantee a safe and successful deployment in clinical practice, the use of AI in cardiology must be done with a thorough understanding of the algorithms and their limits. In summary, AI-enhanced electrocardiography has enormous potential to improve the management of cardiovascular illness by delivering precise and timely diagnostic insights, aiding clinicians, and enhancing patient outcomes. Further study and development are required to fully realize AI's promise for improving cardiology practices and patient care as technology continues to advance.

Impacts of the advancement in artificial intelligence on laboratory medicine in low- and middle-income countries: Challenges and recommendations-A literature review

Background and Aims

Artificial intelligence (AI) has emerged as a transformative force in laboratory medicine, promising significant advancements in healthcare delivery. This study explores the potential impact of AI on diagnostics and patient management within the context of laboratory medicine, with a particular focus on low- and middle-income countries (LMICs).

Methods

In writing this article, we conducted a thorough search of databases such as PubMed, ResearchGate, Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar within 20 years. The study examines AI's capabilities, including learning, reasoning, and decision-making, mirroring human cognitive processes. It highlights AI's adeptness at processing vast data sets, identifying patterns, and expediting the extraction of actionable insights, particularly in medical imaging interpretation and laboratory test data analysis. The research emphasizes the potential benefits of AI in early disease detection, therapeutic interventions, and personalized treatment strategies.

Results

In the realm of laboratory medicine, AI demonstrates remarkable precision in interpreting medical images such as radiography, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging. Its predictive analytical capabilities extend to forecasting patient trajectories and informing personalized treatment strategies using comprehensive data sets comprising clinical outcomes, patient records, and laboratory results. The study underscores the significance of AI in addressing healthcare challenges, especially in resource-constrained LMICs.

Conclusion

While acknowledging the profound impact of AI on laboratory medicine in LMICs, the study recognizes challenges such as inadequate data availability, digital infrastructure deficiencies, and ethical considerations. Successful implementation necessitates substantial investments in digital infrastructure, the establishment of data-sharing networks, and the formulation of regulatory frameworks. The study concludes that collaborative efforts among stakeholders, including international organizations, governments, and nongovernmental entities, are crucial for overcoming obstacles and responsibly integrating AI into laboratory medicine in LMICs. A comprehensive, coordinated approach is essential for realizing AI's transformative potential and advancing health care in LMICs.

Meningitis in Niger Republic amidst COVID-19: current issues and novel recommendations

Amidst coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), there has been a misplaced priority on meningitis in the Niger Republic, thus refocusing resources and attention away from the continuing meningitis campaign in the Niger Republic. The over-strained state of public health resources and staff has also led to decreased surveillance, postponed diagnoses, and constrained immunization efforts in Niger Republic. This review aims to bridge the gaps regarding meningitis amid COVID-19 in Niger Republic and offer recommendations to government to mitigate meningitis in the country, with the hope of finding a permanent solution to this debilitating disease. The authors reviewed 45 past and present pieces of literature on meningitis and COVID-19 from 2013 to 2023 in well-renowned scientific databases such as PubMed, ResearchGate, Google Scholar, African Journals Online, Medline, and Embase. Since 2015, Niger Republic has experienced multiple meningitis epidemics that have resulted in 20, 789 cases and 1, 369 deaths [a case fatality rate (CFR) of 6.6%]. A total of 231 cases of meningitis were reported from 1 November 2021 to 31 January 2022. And recently, 559 cases of meningitis (of which 111 are laboratory confirmed), including 18 deaths (overall CFR 3.2%), occurred in the Zinder region, southeast of Niger Republic, from 1 November 2022 to 27 January 2023. Meningitis remains a public health concern in the world, especially in Niger Republic, which could lead to serious long-term complications. Therefore, adequate and novel measures and therapeutic actions should be implemented by the Niger Government to lessen the burden of the disease in the country.