Impact of intraoral scanner, scanning strategy, and scanned arch on the scan accuracy of edentulous arches: An in vitro study.
J Prosthet Dent 2023:S0022-3913(23)00069-0. [PMID:
36841708 DOI:
10.1016/j.prosdent.2023.01.027]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2022] [Revised: 01/23/2023] [Accepted: 01/25/2023] [Indexed: 02/27/2023]
Abstract
STATEMENT OF PROBLEM
The scanning strategy used when making complete arch digital scans affects the accuracy of the scan, and the accuracy of the strategy may be influenced by the scanner used. However, these effects have not been investigated thoroughly with complete arch edentulous scanning.
PURPOSE
The purpose of this in vitro study was to determine the effect of scanning strategies and the scanned arch on the accuracy of complete arch edentulous scans using 2 intraoral scanner (IOS) systems.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
Two IOSs were used (TRIOS 4 and Emerald S) to scan maxillary and mandibular typodonts using 6 scanning strategies (test scans), and conventional impressions of both arches were also made. By using a metrology software program, test scans were superimposed onto a reference scan, and the root mean square (RMS) of the absolute deviation values was calculated to express trueness. The sample with the best trueness was used as reference onto which the remaining samples from the same group were superimposed, and the RMS of the absolute deviation values was calculated to express precision. Statistical modeling was applied using the fixed effects models (α=.05).
RESULTS
The main effects of scanner and strategy significantly impacted the trueness RMS values (P<.001), with significant interactions between them (P=.012). The main effects of scanner, strategy, and arch significantly impacted the precision of RMS values (P=.004), (P=.033), and (P=.023). Conventional impressions and the TRIOS 4 scanner had comparable accuracy, while the Emerald S scanner was inferior to both. P-O-B had the highest overall accuracy and strategy ZZ had the worst. Better precision was found with the maxillary arch.
CONCLUSIONS
The scanner type and scanning strategy significantly impacted the accuracy of the digital scans of completely edentulous arches, with a significant interaction between scanner and strategy. The arch being scanned had a significant effect on scan precision but not on scan trueness.
Collapse