The need for long-term treatment of peptic ulcer

Some 10% of the population in Western countries will suffer a duodenal ulcer or gastric ulcer at some time in their lives. Although there has been an improvement in the survival rate of patients with peptic ulcer haemorrhage, the mortality is still approximately 10%. There is evidence to suggest that peptic ulcer disease is a life-long condition and that ulcers remain active with an unchanged potential for complications such as haemorrhage and perforation. Over the past 15 years anti-ulcer drugs with different mechanisms of action have been developed, and their use results in complete healing of an ulcer in four to eight weeks. However, most patients experience recurrence of their peptic ulcer after discontinuation of the healing therapy. Studies of continuous H2-receptor antagonist therapy have shown that recurrence occurs less frequently than in untreated patients, is largely asymptomatic, and is rarely characterized by haemorrhagic complications. Limited data on therapy for the eradication of Helicobacter pylori suggest that this may be an alternative approach for selected patients. As protection afforded by H2-receptor antagonists remains undiminished over the course of several years and is also observed in ulcers which have bled in the past, the implementation of long-term management with these agents constitutes a rational policy.

Novel non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: what we have learned from animal studies

The use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) is frequently associated with serious adverse effects related to the inhibition of cyclooxygenase (COX) in tissues where prostanoids exert physiological effects, such as gastric mucosal defence, renal homeostasis and platelet aggregation. The discovery of a second COX isoform (COX-2) specifically induced in pathological tissues led to the development of selective COX-2 inhibitors, believed to have an improved safety profile compared to traditional NSAIDs. Animal studies, however, have revealed a protective role for the COX-2 enzyme in the stomach, kidney, heart, vasculature and reproductive system, and therefore, the safety of COX-2 selective inhibitors needs to be reassessed. On the other hand, new therapeutic indications have emerged as a result of the role played by COX-2 overexpression in cancer or Alzheimer's disease. A second approach aimed at obtaining safer NSAIDs is based on the gastroprotective effects of nitric oxide (NO). Traditional NSAIDs chemically linked to NO-releasing moieties retain the therapeutic efficacy, but not the adverse effects, of the parent NSAIDs. Moreover, additional therapeutic applications in cardiovascular diseases, Alzheimer's disease and cancer have been suggested. Animal data, however, need to be confirmed in large clinical trials. Finally, the increase in endogenous NO via a selective increase in inducible NO synthase in the gastric mucosa is the mechanism underlying the good gastric tolerability and the gastroprotective effects of the non-selective NSAID amtolmetin guacyl, documented to date in the rat.

[Nitric oxide and gastroduodenal damage caused by NSAIDs. Recent findings and clinical implications]

A significant role of nitric oxide (NO) is being acknowledged gastroduodenal mucosa defense mechanism(s) against the injurious effect of NSAIDs. Many of the NO effects recall those of prostaglandins, such as direct protection of epithelial cells, mucus release, repair of mucosal erosions or ulcerations, mast cell degranulation. Other co-effects prove to be the inhibition of neutrophil adherence to the vascular endothelium, also associated with an improved mucosal blood flow. NO may also act by scavenging oxygen-derivedfree radicals. Consequently, in order to reduce the NSAID gastrotoxicity has been proposed: a) the linking of a NO-releasing mojety to these agents (NSAID NO-donors); b) the use of amtolmetin guacyl (AMG), a drug which induces an increase in the gastric mucosa NO concentration via direct stimulation of the local endogenous synthesis of this gas. Clinical studies on the efficacy and tolerability have been carried out with AMG versus other NSAIDs (diclofenac, indomethacin, piroxicam, naproxen) in patients with osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis and a number of post-traumatic arthropathies. As far as clinical symptoms are concerned AMG proves to be equally effective, but significantly better as far as gastroscopic lesions are concerned. NONSAIDs and AMG may play an important role among the long-term treatment of chronic inflammatory osteoarticular and rheumatic diseases.

[Lansoprazole: an analysis of the clinical trials in the 3 years of 1997-1999]

Aim of this overview was to evaluate the main clinical trials with lansoprazole published from 1997 to 1999 in English-language journals, regarding gastroesophageal reflux disease, peptic ulcer, NSAID-induced ulcer, and ZES. Results of clinical trials for therapy and prevention of lesions/symptoms have been evaluated separately. In direct comparisons, lansoprazole alone (not combined with antibiotics) proves to be equieffective to other PPI and more effective than H2-RA in both therapy and prevention of GERD, peptic ulcer (a part from anti-Hp regimens) and NSAID-induced ulcer. Among Hp-eradicating regimens in patients with peptic ulcer or functional dyspepsia, lansoprazole-based triple therapy is equal in efficacy to other PPI-based or RBC-based triple therapies and, in any case, significantly better than dual therapies. The in vitro anti-Hp activity of lansoprazole, more marked than with other PPI, does not seem to effort clinical advantages. Safety of lansoprazole is largely satisfactory and no different from other PPI and H2-RA.

[NSAID-induced gastroduodenal damage: strategies for prevention]

The improved knowledge of the mechanism by which NSAIDs work and damage the gastrointestinal (GI) mucosal suggested a series of measures for the prevention of NSAIDs-induced GI lesions, apart from the use of those proved to be less toxic. PPI have now been definitively shown to be more effective in the relief of symptoms and in the healing and prevention of ulcers/erosions than H2-antagonists and also better tolerated than misoprostol. Other more innovative approaches include selective and highly selective COX-2 inhibitors, NSAIDs containing NO or stimulating the gastric endogenous biosynthesis of NO, and chiral NSAIDs. Clinical usefulness of other compounds, including NSAIDs associated with zwitterionic phospholipids or fibroblast growth factor, is still under investigation.

[Functional dyspepsia in the aged]

Functional dyspepsia (FD) is a very common syndrome in general population which does not spare the elderly. To define the pathophysiology of FD (GI secretion and motility, visceral sensitivity, psyche) in the elderly proves to be a difficult task, because it is hard enough in itself to discriminate between troubles due to "normal" ageing and manifestations of diseases to which the elderly are particularly susceptible. At any event, unlike in non-elderly dyspeptics, in elderly patients thorough GI investigations are always absolutely mandatory. Dietary recommendations should be simple and reasonable. Drug therapy by antisecretory and prokinetic agents should not be too strong, because the elderly are particularly sensitive to drugs, and are often taking other drugs for extra-intestinal pathology.

Lansoprazole versus omeprazole for duodenal ulcer healing and prevention of relapse: a randomized, multicenter, double-masked trial

The aim of this randomized, multicenter, double-masked, parallel-group study was to compare the efficacy of lansoprazole with that of omeprazole monotherapy in duodenal ulcer healing and prevention of relapse. A total of 251 patients with duodenal ulcer were treated with either lansoprazole 30 mg/d (n = 167) or omeprazole 40 mg/d (n = 84). Patients with healed ulcers were then randomly allocated to 12 months of maintenance therapy with lansoprazole 15 mg/d (n = 74), lansoprazole 30 mg/d (n = 71), or omeprazole 20 mg/d (n = 73). Healing rates at 4 weeks (intent-to-treat analysis) were 93.9% (95% confidence interval [CI], 90.2% to 97.6%) with lansoprazole and 97.5% (95% CI, 93.7% to 100%) with omeprazole; there were no significant differences between groups. Endoscopic relapse rates after 6 months were 4.5% (95% CI, 0% to 10.6%) with lansoprazole 15 mg, 0% with lansoprazole 30 mg, and 6.3% (95% CI, 1.5% to 12.5%) with omeprazole 20 mg, compared with 3.3% (95% CI, 0% to 8.2%), 0%, and 3.5% (95% CI, 0% to 8.8%), respectively, at 12 months. Again, there were no significant differences between groups. The incidence of adverse events during acute treatment was 6.0% and 7.1% in the lansoprazole and omeprazole groups, respectively; during maintenance therapy, the incidences were 12.2% (lansoprazole 15 mg), 5.6% (lansoprazole 30 mg), and 11.0% (omeprazole 20 mg). Within treatment groups, pain was significantly ameliorated after the acute phase but not after maintenance therapy (P < 0.05); no differences were observed between groups. Gastrin values increased significantly after acute therapy (P < 0.05), persisted at these increased levels during maintenance therapy, and returned to normal after 6-month follow-up. Both lansoprazole and omeprazole were highly effective and well tolerated in the treatment of duodenal ulcer; relapse rates were similar for all doses studied. Thus no additional benefit is to be gained from using a proton-pump inhibitor at a dose > 15 mg lansoprazole to prevent relapse.

[Peptic ulcer, functional dyspepsia, Helicobacter pylori: a 1998 stock-taking on the topic of their correlation and therapeutic strategies]

While the correlation between Helicobacter pylori and peptic ulcer is accepted worldwide, the role of Hp in functional dyspepsia is still a debatable issue. Therefore, Hp eradication in all dyspeptic patients has both supporters and opponents. In contrast, anti-Hp regimens are increasingly well defined, most convincing treatments being triple therapies consisting of one proton pump inhibitor (PPI) or ranitidine bismuth citrate (RBC) plus two antimicrobials. Duration of anti-Hp regimens varies from 2 weeks (more usually adopted in USA) and 1 week (more usually adopted in Europe). Due to the short and simple anti-Hp triple therapies, side effects prove to be few and negligible and patient compliance is significantly better. By contrast, Hp resistance to extensively used antimicrobials, such as metronidazole and clarithromycin, is more than an emerging problem causing significantly lower eradication rates. Very recent data indicate that RBC-based triple therapy is much less affected by the helicobacterial resistance, and is also effective in non-responders to a PPI-based triple therapy.

[NSAID-induced gastrointestinal diseases: recent data on pathogenesis and prevention]

Our knowledge of the mechanism by which aspirin and traditional NSAIDs work and damage the gastrointestinal mucosa, recently markedly improved, has suggested a number of measures for the prevention of the NSAID-induced GI lesions. Among these, perhaps the most innovative approach seems to be the nitric oxide-releasing NSAIDs or compounds, like amtolmetin guacyl, that work by increasing the endogenous biosynthesis of NO selectively at gastric mucosa level. Further data, stemming from large RCTs and confirming the results of experimental studies and the initial clinical experiences, are needed to better define the true clinical impact of this approach.

Ranitidine bismuth citrate with either clarithromycin 1 g/day or 1.5 g/day is equally effective in the eradication of H. pylori and healing of duodenal ulcer

BACKGROUND

No randomized double-blind studies have been performed to compare clarithromycin 1 g/day with higher doses of the macrolide (1.5 g/day) when combined with ranitidine bismuth citrate (RBC).

AIM

To compare H. pylori eradication and ulcer healing rates of RBC 400 mg b.d. for 4 weeks combined for the first 2 weeks either with clarithromycin 500 mg b.d. (Group A) or clarithromycin 500 mg t.d.s. (Group B).

METHODS

Two hundred and seventy-three patients with H. pylori-positive active duodenal ulcer were included. H. pylori infection was detected by CLO-test and histology on antral and corpus biopsies before and at least 4 weeks after the end of therapy. Eradication was assumed if both CLO-test and histology results were negative for H. pylori.

RESULTS

Eradication/healing rates according to intention-to-treat and per protocol analysis were 76/82% and 87/92% for Group A and 78/85% and 88/95% for Group B, respectively (P = N.S.). Adverse events were reported by 7% and 12% of patients in Groups A and B, respectively, and they were generally mild.

CONCLUSIONS

RBC in co-prescription with clarithromycin 500 mg b.d. is as effective as RBC plus clarithromycin 500 t.d.s. in eradicating H. pylori and healing duodenal ulcers.

Randomised trial of single and repeated fibrin glue compared with injection of polidocanol in treatment of bleeding peptic ulcer

BACKGROUND

Although injection treatments for ulcer haemostasis seem to be effective, recurrent bleeding remains a serious problem. Large randomised clinical trials are required to show differences between treatment modalities for gastrointestinal bleeding. The aim of this study was to compare the safety and efficacy of repeated endoscopic injection of fibrin glue (FG) with that of single endoscopic injection of polidocanol in the prevention of recurrent bleeding.

METHODS

854 patients with active gastroduodenal bleeding (spurting, oozing), or ulcers with a visible non-bleeding vessel, were randomly assigned one of three endoscopic treatments: single application of polidocanol 1%, single application of FG, or daily repeated application of FG until the visible vessel had disappeared. All patients were pretreated with local injection of epinephrine (1/10,000), and had daily repeat endoscopies until the vessel observed at initial endoscopy was no longer visible.

FINDINGS

Recurrent bleeding rates among the 790 patients in whom the rates could be assessed were 58 (22.8%) of 254 in the polidocranol group, 51 (19.2%) of 266 in the FG-single group, and 41 (15.2%) of 270 in the FG-repeated group. The difference between FG-repeated treatment and polidocanol was significant (p = 0.036). Treatment failed, making other treatments (including surgery) necessary, in 34 (13.0%) of 261 in the polidocanol group, 34 (12.4%) of 274 in the FG-single group, and 21 (7.7%) of 274 in the FG-repeated group. The difference between FG-repeated treatment and polidocanol was significant (p = 0.046). The 30-day-mortality rates were low in all three treatment groups (polidocanol 4.7%; FG-single treatment 5.3%, FG-repeated treatment 4.3%). The safety profiles of the three treatment strategies were similar.

INTERPRETATION

Repeated injection with FG glue is significantly more effective than injection with polidocanol 1% in the treatment of bleeding from gastroduodenal ulcers.

[The epidemiology of the gastroduodenal damage induced by aspirin and other nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs]

A substantial body of studies (controlled, cohort and case-control studies) now confirm the long established impression that there is an increased prevalence of gastric and duodenal ulcer and of associated complications in subjects treated with aspirin (ASA) or with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). The overall percentage of ulcers/erosions in patients treated with ASA ranges from 10 to 50% with a relative risk of bleeding ranging from 1.8 to 15%. The overall relative risk of ulcers/erosions in NSAIDs-treated subjects is around 3%, with complications detectable in 2.4% of cases. The risk of lesions and complications associated with ASA/NSAIDs is more marked in patients aged over 65, in those with a previous history of ulcer (both symptomatic and silent), in those treated with substantial doses or with combinations of NSAIDs and in those concomitantly using anticoagulants and/or steroids. The epidemiological data highlight the importance of implementing ASA/NSAIDs therapy only when strictly necessary as well as the advisability of adopting as broad a range of measures as possible to reduce the tissue-damaging effects of these pharmacological agents.

[The medical therapy of chronic pancreatitis. Problems, progress and outlook]

The aims of medical therapy in chronic pancreatitis are mainly to relieve the recurrent pain and to correct any malabsorption secondary to digestive insufficiency resulting from deficient exocrine pancreatic function. The treatment of the pain initially involves the use of dietary measures and analgesic drugs. The results of the use of pancreatic extracts and somatostatin reported in the literature are controversial, as are those of coeliac plexus block. Of unquestionable efficacy, at least in the short to medium term, are surgical decompression interventions in patients, with pain refractory to these measures and who present significant dilation of Wirsung's duct at ERCP. Endoscopic decompression constitutes an alternative to surgical decompression. In view of the transitory results of endoscopic decompression, which, in any event, should be implemented only by endoscopists possessing the necessary experience and expertise, the use of this technique may perhaps be targeted at carefully selected patients to be submitted to surgical decompression. As far as maldigestion is concerned, which occurs only when the pancreatic functional deficit reaches 90% or more, replacement therapy with pancreatic extracts must be resorted to. Multi-Unit Dose preparations are to be preferred, consisting in gastro-protected microspheres measuring not more than 2 mm in diameter and containing high doses of lipase, since at least 30,000 I.U. of lipase are required in the post-prandial phase for reasonably satisfactory correction of the steatorrhoea. Should this fail to prove effective, it is good policy to add antisecretory drugs (H2-antagonists, proton-pump inhibitors).

[The eradication of Helicobacter pylori and the prevention of ulcer recurrence. The certainties and the open problems]

Maintenance treatment with antisecretory agents, and above all with H2-RA, is a therapeutic option still largely favoured by physicians. However, in the last decades the pathogenetic role of Helicobacter pylori (Hp) in duodenal and gastric ulcer has met with increasingly convincing confirmation. Actually, Hp eradication brings about a dramatic and persistent decrease in ulcer relapse rate. At present, there is a general agreement that Hp-positive patients, with ulcer whether ab initio or recurrent, need to be treated with anti-Hp regimens. The first choice therapy, according to some clinicians, should be the classic triple therapy (colloidal bismuth, metronidazole and tetracicline or amoxicillin) associated or not with a proton pomp inhibitors (PPI) or H2-RA. Though supported by other gastroenterologists, dual therapy with a PPI plus amoxicillin raises some perplexity due to the unpredictable variability of the results. Non-bismuth triple therapy, consisting in 2 antimicrobial and 1 antisecretory agent, for which a duration of only 1 week would seem sufficient even at low dosage, is currently meeting with greater favour. The FDA approval is probably imminent for 2 anti-Hp regimens consisting in clarithromycin plus a PPI or the complex salt ranitidine-bismuth citrate.

[Diet and drugs in the therapy of nonorganic dyspepsia: the hypothesis and factual data]

Non-organic dyspepsia, although not frequently reported, is still a disorder which is difficult to classify in nosographic and physiopathological terms, a fact which inevitably influences the indications for its treatment. Non-pharmacological treatment of non-organic dyspepsia includes changes in dietary and behavioural habits which, even if established on empirical grounds, play a far from ancillary role. When considered appropriate, pharmacological treatment must be formulated solely on the basis of controlled clinical trials vs placebo given the well-known significance of the placebo effect in this and other so-called "functional" diseases. The therapeutic strategies which are most subject to verification are based on the one hand on the neutralisation or inhibition of gastric acid secretion and, on the other, on the improvement of gastrointestinal motility. Surprisingly, the widely used antacid drugs are among those which have been less well studied and show the lowest efficacy. Among the anti-secretory drugs, pirenzepine is approximately 25% more effective than placebo. H2-antagonists, the drugs which have been most closely studied both in terms of the number of trials and the size of the sample populations studied, produce contradictory results. However, a meta-analysis of the trials shows an overall 18% improvement in efficacy compared to placebo. The overall results of studies on prokinetic compounds are "good" in meta-analytical terms, with an improved efficacy of 50% compared to placebo. This is not necessarily due to the superiority of prokinetic compared to anti-secretory drugs and can be explained by the reduced placebo effect in trials using prokinetic drugs or a greater presence in the latter of dyspepsia which is physiopathologically correlated to motor discord. Among the future drugs still being studied, it is particularly worth mentioning fedotozine, a specific K opioid receptor agonist which appears to have provided extremely interesting results in preliminary studies. The role of barrier drugs, such as sucralfate and colloidal bismuth, continues to remain unclear and in particular the latter might be of increased use if evidence of a relationship between Helicobacter pylori and non-organic dyspepsia were reinforced; this relationship may in fact not exist in all dyspeptic patients but only in a subgroup. Lastly, the problem of the duration of pharmacological treatment still remains unsolved, as do the questions of whether longterm treatment should be conceived once acute symptoms have disappeared and whether it is possible to hypothesise differentiated pharmacological treatment depending on the clinical variants of functional dyspepsia which have been defined with greater attention over the course of the past decade.

Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) of gallbladder stones: experience in Bolzano

During a period of 24 months, 115 patients with symptomatic gallbladder stones (77 females, 38 males; median age 46 years, range 22-87) were treated by extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy with a Lithostar Plus. Concomitant bile acid dissolution therapy (ursodeoxycholic acid + chenodeoxycholic acid 7.5 mg/kg/day each or tauroursodesoxycholic acid 5-10mg/kg/day) was administered until 3 months after total fragment clearance. Complete clearance of all fragments was obtained after 6, 9, 12, 18 and 24 months in, respectively, 30, 45, 51, 62 and 72%. Life table analysis of the subgroups showed significantly better clearance results in patients with fragments < 5mm at the first extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy session (67%) than in patients with larger fragments (39%) (p < 0.01). Patients with solitary stones < 20mm cleared their fragments better (58%) at 12 months than those with multiple stones (49%), but the differences were not statistically significant. Stone recurrence was 6% at 1 year and was lower in patients with solitary stones (3%) than in those with multiple stones (12%). Major side effects consisted in 2 cases of mild acute pancreatits and 19% of biliary colics.

Oral cromolyn sodium in comparison with elimination diet in the irritable bowel syndrome, diarrheic type. Multicenter study of 428 patients

BACKGROUND

In a significant number of patients affected by the irritable bowel syndrome, an adverse reaction to food is proposed to be a causative factor. A diet that eliminates the offending foods is the obvious treatment for such adverse reactions. Compliance with a dietetic regimen is often poor and sometimes not completely free from risks.

METHODS

Since the diarrheic type of irritable bowel syndrome seems mainly affected by food intolerance, and previous observations suggested that oral cromolyn sodium is effective in such patients, a multicenter therapeutic trial in the diarrheic type of irritable bowel syndrome was carried out in 346 of 409 patients with this disease, to evaluate the effects of oral cromolyn sodium and compare its efficacy with that of an elimination diet.

RESULTS

Symptoms related to the irritable bowel syndrome improved in 60% of patients treated with elimination diet and in 67% of those treated with oral cromolyn sodium (1500 mg/day) for 1 month. Moreover, in both groups clinical results were significantly better in the patients positive to the skin prick test than in the negative ones.

CONCLUSIONS

These results confirm the high prevalence of adverse reactions to foods in diarrheic irritable bowel syndrome and the usefulness of cromolyn sodium treatment in these patients.

Chronic gastritis, intestinal metaplasia, dysplasia and Helicobacter pylori in gastric cancer: putting the pieces together

Chronic gastritis may favour the development of gastric cancer more as a condition than as precancerous lesion. Since, in most cases, it is pathologically correlated with Helicobacter pylori infection, it is reasonable to postulate at least an indirect role for this organism in the pathogenesis of gastric cancer. H. pylori, however, is only one of the risk factors involved, in that additional factors (excess salt, cigarette smoking, deficiency of foodstuffs with an antioxidizing effect) may facilitate the malignant transformation of chronic atrophic gastritis into intestinal-type gastric cancer. Gastric carcinogenesis therefore presents itself as a multifactorial, multistage process, furthered by the occurrence of precancerous lesions which are usually interrelated (type-III intestinal metaplasia, severe dysplasia) and by functional alterations such as achlorhydria, which, though it is not enough in itself to cause gastric cancer, promotes abnormal intragastric bacterial development, a condition which may be followed by abnormal intragastric formation of cancerogenous nitroso compounds. The existence of a close correlation between both gastric cancer and H. pylori infection and low socio-economic and hygienic status of the population lends further strength to the hypothesis that an "H. pylori factor" is involved in gastric carcinogenesis. Consequently, to reduce the risk of gastric cancer, various strategies have been devised to prevent H. pylori infection (improvement in socio-environmental conditions, anti-H. pylori vaccine) and/or to eradicate the organism (by means of therapeutic regimens including antimicrobial agents, which, however, can be implemented only in patients who have not developed diffuse atrophy and/or dysplasia, in whom H. pylori may no longer be detectable). Definitive proof of the real extent of the relationship between H. pylori and gastric cancer and of the efficacy of therapeutic and preventive measures can be provided only by controlled trials in populations with a high prevalence of chronic non-atrophic gastritis which are difficult to organize.

Placebo and placebo effect: their impact on the evaluation of drug response in patients

Placebo, defined as any therapeutic procedure, without any specific activity, given deliberately to have an effect on a patient, symptom, syndrome or disease, has a great impact in the evaluation of drug response. The possible pathways via which the possible effect brings about clinical and physiological changes remain unknown, but a humoral mechanism seems to be implicated in some placebo effects (e.g. placebo-induced analgesia). The placebo effect depends on many factors, including the type of patient, the personality of the physician, the doctor-patient relationship and the type and even the colour of the drug preparation. Placebo control is important particularly when the disease is characterized by frequent spontaneous periods of acute exacerbation and remission. Functional (such as dyspepsia and irritable bowel syndrome) and organic (such as peptic ulcer and inflammatory bowel disease) gastrointestinal diseases have got great benefit from placebo-controlled clinical trials. In such trials the more effective the placebo is, the more difficult it will be to demonstrate the efficacy of active drug in statistical terms. Nevertheless, provided the use of placebo be ethical for a given condition, placebo-controlled trials are the only objective way of assessing correctly drug response in patients.

[Helicobacter pylori and the treatment of gastric ulcer. Reflections and uncertainties]

The authors examine the relationship between Helicobacter pylori and gastric ulcer therapy, analyzing both the data suggesting that eradication of the organism renders the gastric mucosa less susceptible to development of gastric ulcer and the substantial body of evidence to the contrary. They review the results reported in clinical trials with colloidal bismuth subcitrate, antimicrobial agents (furazolidone), and combinations of antiulcer and antimicrobial agents (H2-antagonist + cefixime, H2-antagonist + metronidazole). Also analyzed is the relationship between Helicobacter pylori eradication and ulcer recurrence; only one study is available on this aspect, and the limited evidence it provides in favour of a prophylactic effect of eradication therapy is not entirely convincing. The authors conclude that there is no reasonable case for the dogmatic assumption that eradication of Helicobacter pylori facilitates either acute healing or long-term prophylaxis of gastric ulcer, though certain subgroups of gastric ulcer patients may benefit from eradication therapy.

Helicobacter pylori and gastric ulcer therapy: reflections and uncertainties

The relationship between Helicobacter pylori (HP) and gastric ulcer therapy is examined by analyzing both the data that suggest that eradication of HP renders the gastric mucosa less susceptible to development of gastric ulcer as well as the substantial body of evidence that does not support this contention. The results reported in clinical trials with colloidal bismuth citrate, antimicrobial agents (furazolidone), and combinations of anti-ulcer and antimicrobial agents (H2-antagonist+cefixime, H2-antagonist+metronidazole) are reviewed. Also analyzed is the relationship between HP eradication and ulcer recurrence. Only one study is available on this aspect, and the limited evidence it provides in favour of a prophylactic effect of eradication therapy is not entirely convincing. The authors conclude that there is no reasonable case for the dogmatic assumption that eradication of HP facilitates either acute healing or long-term prophylaxis of gastric ulcer, though certain subgroups of gastric ulcer patients may benefit from eradication therapy.

[No acid, no ulcer: such a simple axiom?]

According to the traditional view gastric acid and pepsin are a sine qua non for ulcer development. Acid suppression, however, is far from being the only successful therapeutic approach, and similar healing rates are achieved by drugs with substantially different mechanisms of action--antacids, H2-antagonists, antimuscarinics, cytoprotective and site-protective agents--thus denoting a multifactorial pathogenesis. Even with the antisecretory compounds, the relationship between gastric acid and ulcer healing gives rise to perplexity: antacids prove effective at widely varying doses; pirenzipine and H2-blockers, which are clinically equieffective, differ considerably in antisecretory efficacy; H2-antagonist studies on early vs late postprandial dosing yield contradictory clinical results; morning and bedtime single administrations of H2-antagonists prove equiactive on ulcer healing, leading to a reappraisal of the alleged importance of nocturnal acidity. Ulcer sealants such as colloidal bismuth and sucralfate prove as effective as H2-antagonists despite their total lack of antisecretory activity, thereby apparently undermining the primary pathogenetic role of acid. However, with the spectacular 100% healing rates achieved by the protonpump blocker, omeprazole, the wheel has come full circle, and gastric acid appears to re-emerge as a primary element in pathogenesis. Specific therapy, based on the predominant pathogenetic factor involved, is likely to be a feasible proposition, but, at present, remains little more than a remote possibility.

Misoprostol prevents NSAID-induced gastroduodenal lesions in patients with osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis

The clinical use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) is associated with significant adverse effects on the integrity of the gastrointestinal (GI) mucosa. A unique, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized, multicentre study investigated the prophylactic co-therapy with misoprostol, a novel PGE1 analog, for the prevention of the NSAID-induced gastric and duodenal mucosal lesions. The study also investigated whether the co-therapy with misoprostol could interfere with the anti-rheumatic action of the NSAIDs using detailed rheumatological assessments. Patients with osteoarthritis or rheumatoid arthritis had to be free of symptoms and significant erosive and/or haemorrhagic lesions of the upper GI tract. The patients were randomized to co-therapy with misoprostol or its matching placebo. Follow-up endoscopy and symptoms assessment were carried out within 4 weeks and compared to pre-study findings. Misoprostol significantly reduced (p less than 0.01) the incidence of erosive and/or haemorrhagic gastric and duodenal mucosal lesions. Misoprostol also reduced the proportion of patients with epigastric pain (p less than 0.01). Misoprostol was well tolerated and did not interfere with the anti-rheumatic activity of the administered NSAID. We conclude that misoprostol is safe and effective in the protection against NSAID-induced gastric and duodenal mucosal lesions and symptoms.

Antisecretory agents, peptic secretion and serum pepsinogen in man

Less attention has been devoted to the effects of antisecretory agents on pepsin secretion than to those on gastric acid secretion, particularly in human subjects. Moreover, comparison of the various trials is far from being simple and straightforward owing to the fact that the studies available present substantial variability in terms of types of subjects (controls, DU patients), gastric secretion (basal, stimulated), type of stimulation (pentagastrin, histamine, insulin, meals, sham feeding) antisecretory drug administration route (oral, i.v.) and considered parameters (concentration, output). This review of the published data reveals that all antisecretory agents reduce pepsin output, regardless of their sometimes very different mechanism of action. Despite this, there are differences in antisecretory effects according to the agent used to stimulate gastric secretion. Even within a single drug class (H2-antagonists, prostaglandins) there may be differences depending on the potency of the compound used.

Effects of sucralfate and sulglycotide treatment on active gastritis and Helicobacter pylori colonization of the gastric mucosa in non-ulcer dyspepsia patients

We conducted a double-blind randomized treatment study on patients affects by non-ulcer dyspepsia in whom multiple biopsy specimens showed active gastritis. Patients were given either 3 g/day of sucralfate (n = 39) or 600 mg/day of sulglycotide (n = 50) for 6 wk, a glycopeptide isolated from pig duodenum constituents. Endoscopy was carried out at baseline and at the end of treatment. We took biopsies from the gastric body (twice) and antrum (six times) at each endoscopy in order to determine grade and extent of gastritis and Helicobacter pylori colonization. Both treatments induced a marked regression of active gastritis (sucralfate group: p less than 0.05 and p less than 0.0001, respectively, in body and in antrum; sulglycotide group: p less than 0.01 and p less than 0.001, respectively). Conversely, Helicobacter pylori colonization remained unchanged at the end of the treatments. At baseline, a close relationship was found between grade of active inflammation in each biopsy and Helicobacter pylori density. After therapy, the association was lost in each treatment group. These results suggest that there can be a remission of active gastritis in patients with non-ulcer dyspepsia even without changes in Helicobacter pylori colonization. This result can be achieved by enhancing the protective properties of the gastric mucosa.

The gastric acid conundrum in peptic ulcer

According to the traditional view, gastric acid and pepsin are a sine qua non for ulcer development. Acid suppression, however, is far from being the only successful therapeutic approach, and similar healing rates are achieved by drugs with substantially different mechanism of action antacids, H2-antagonists, antimuscarinics, cytoprotective and site-protective agents-thus denoting a multifactorial pathogenesis. Even with the antisecretory compounds, the relationship between gastric acid and ulcer healing gives rise to perplexity: antacids prove effective at widely varying doses; pirenzipine and H2-blockers, which are clinically equieffective, differ considerably in antisecretory efficacy; H2-antagonist studies on early vs late postprandial dosing, yield contradictory clinical results; morning and bedtime single administration of H2-antagonists prove equiactive on ulcer healing, leading to a appraisal of the alleged importance of nocturnal acidity. Ulcer sealants such as colloidal bismuth and sucralfate prove as effective as H2-antagonists despite their total lack of antisecretory activity, thereby reapparently under-mining the primary pathogenetic role of acid. However, with the spectacular 100% healing rates achieved by the proton-pump blocker, omeprazole, the wheel has come full circle, and gastric acid appears to re-emerge as a primary element in pathogenesis. Specific therapy, based on the predominant pathogenetic factor involved, is likely to be a feasible proposition, but, at present, remains little more than a remote possibility.

Longterm treatment of irritable bowel syndrome with cimetropium bromide: a double blind placebo controlled clinical trial

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of cimetropium bromide, a new antimuscarinic compound, in relieving symptoms of patients with irritable bowel syndrome over a three month period. Seventy consecutive outpatients were given cimetropium (50 mg tid) or placebo according to a double blind, randomised, parallel groups design. Symptoms were evaluated initially and at monthly intervals up to the end of the study period. One patient receiving placebo withdrew because of treatment failure. Pain score decreased by 40, 66, 85% in the cimetropium group, at the end of the first, second and third months respectively, compared with 26, 32 and 52% reductions among controls (p = 0.0005). At the end of treatment there was a 86% reduction in the number of abdominal pain episodes per day in the cimetropium group compared with 50% in the placebo group (p = 0.001). Constipation and diarrhoea scores decreased by 59 and 49% in the cimetropium treated patients, compared with 37 and 39% in controls, the differences between being not significant. At the end of the study 89% of the patients treated with cimetropium considered themselves as globally improved as opposed to 69% in the placebo group (p = 0.039). The corresponding 95% confidence intervals for the differences between the proportion of improved patients in the two groups were from 11% to 29%. Six patients taking cimetropium complained of slight dry mouth. The results of this study showed that cimetropium bromide is effective in relieving pain in patients with irritable bowel syndrome.

Drug treatment of functional dyspepsia. A meta-analysis of randomized controlled clinical trials

The results of therapeutic trials in functional dyspepsia (FD), a frequently encountered condition, are contradictory. Our aim, then, was to produce a pooled estimate, or meta-analysis, of a series of short-term randomized placebo-controlled clinical trials on the pharmacological treatment of FD with antisecretory and gastrokinetic drugs. We retrieved trials for analysis purposes by consulting computerized data bases and by scanning published reviews, Current Contents, and references cited in the individual studies. We also requested bibliographical updates from the medical departments of the manufacturers of the drugs used in the various trials. Of 74 trials retrieved by these means, 23 proved eligible for meta-analysis on the basis of six selection criteria defined a priori. Results were expressed in terms of "therapeutic success" (TS), which includes "symptom-free patients," patients with "significant improvement in symptoms," "excellent results," and so on. The differences in TS rates between the various drugs and placebo were calculated in each trial as the algebraic difference together with the respective 95% confidence interval (95% C.I.); the pooling of results of all eligible trials was done using Cochran's weighted method. With antisecretory drugs, the mean difference in TS rates versus placebo was +20% (95% C.I.: 14-24%). The therapeutic gain for the respective antisecretory agents was 25% (95% C.I.: 14-36%) in the case of pirenzepine and 18% (95% C.I.: 12-24%) in the case of H2 antagonists. Meta-analysis of trials with gastrokinetic drugs also showed superior efficacy of these agents compared with placebo, with a mean difference in TS rates of +46% (95% C.I.: 40-52%).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Octatropine-methyl-bromide and sulglycotide salt in the short-term treatment of active duodenal ulcer. A double blind endoscopic study of 40 outpatients

Forty outpatients with endoscopically confirmed duodenal ulcers were entered in a double blind trial. They were randomly allocated to octatropine-methyl-bromide and sulglycotide salt (GVP) or placebo. The results show that the combination of the two drugs is less efficacious than the two constituent substances taken separately, is not more efficacious than placebo in ulcer healing, and is ineffective with regard to ulcer pain.

Oxmetidine in the short term treatment of active duodenal ulcer. A review and commentary

Oxmetidine is an H2-antagonist like cimetidine containing an imidazole ring in its molecule, but differing from cimetidine in that it contains in the side-chain a substituted isocytosine moiety in place of the cyanoguanidine group. Nine controlled clinical trials are critically analysed in detail. The overall results show that the antiulcer activity of oxmetidine is not significantly different from that of cimetidine with mean healing rates by week 4 of 74.9% and 75.3%, respectively. Healing rates proved to be lower in smokers than in non-smokers in all trials but one. Satisfactory response as regards symptoms was obtained both with oxmetidine and cimetidine. A certain degree of variability with regard to the untoward effects was found, but in all cases failed to prove significant from the clinical point of view. However, a better definition of oxmetidine safety requires a study on a large number of patients and for a longer period.

Campylobacter pylori and non-ulcer dyspepsia. 1. The final results of a double-blind multicentre trial for treatment with pirenzepine in Italy

In a double-blind multicentre trial to study the effect of pirenzepine in the treatment of non-ulcer dyspepsia, 104 of 128 patients, 52 in each of the study and control groups, completed the 4 weeks of the investigation. There was improvement of the endoscopic and clinical findings but no change of the degree of the mucosal inflammation or the extent of colonisation by campylobacter pylori. The mode of action of pirenzepine in patients with non-ulcer dyspepsia associated with campylobacter related gastroduodenitis remains obscure. Further studies are needed to investigate the possibility of a causal relationship between mucosal colonisation with campylobacter pylori and gastroduodenitis specially in cases of non-ulcer dyspepsia.

Cisapride versus placebo in reflux esophagitis. A multicenter double-blind trial

In a 6 to 12-week double-blind trial, the effect of cisapride (10 mg q.i.d.) was compared with that of placebo in 63 patients with esophagitis confirmed by endoscopy and/or biopsy. In only one patient (3%) in the cisapride group but in 43% of the placebo patients (p = 0.001), symptoms had not improved after 6 weeks. Forty patients continued treatment until week 12. At that time, control endoscopy showed a significantly (p = 0.005) higher rate of healing (no erosions, ulcers, or bleeding mucosa) in the cisapride patients (63%) than in the placebo patients (12%). At week 12, only three of the 21 cisapride patients still had moderate reflux symptoms, whereas eight of the 19 placebo patients had moderate or severe symptoms (p less than 0.05). Cisapride patients also took significantly (p less than 0.001) less antacids during the trial. These results show that cisapride, 10 mg q.i.d., heals esophagitis lesions and greatly reduces associated symptoms. The treatment was well tolerated.

First-degree atrioventricular block in a young duodenal ulcer patient treated with a standard oral dose of ranitidine

A 20-year-old male patient on oral treatment with ranitidine 300 mg/day in a single bedtime dose was admitted to hospital for a brief episode of syncope which had occurred 20 min earlier. All clinical, laboratory and instrumental examinations yielded negative findings, except for electrocardiographic evidence of first-degree atrioventricular block. Administration of atropine produced transient disappearance of the block, which disappeared altogether after discontinuing ranitidine treatment. Two separate rechallenges with ranitidine each produced recurrence of (asymptomatic) first-degree atrioventricular block at electrocardiographic examination, but oral treatment with cimetidine (400-800 mg/day) and famotidine (40-80 mg/day) induced no electrocardiographic abnormalities. The hypothesis that this patient may be abnormally susceptible to the cholinergic or cholinergic-like effect of ranitidine, a side effect unrelated to the drug's primary H2-blocking action, would appear to be consistent with evidence of an increased vagal tone of the atrioventricular node as revealed by atrial pacing. However, the ability of ranitidine to release histamine in man and the potential dysrhythmia-inducing effect of histamine should also be taken into consideration.

Influence of ulcer healing agents on ulcer relapse after discontinuation of acute treatment: a pooled estimate of controlled clinical trials

Whether or not the incidence of ulcer relapse varies according to the drug used to produce initial healing is a controversial matter. We tackled this problem using data from 15 eligible trials from 25 published controlled trials in patients followed up for six to 12 months. Pooled estimates of differences in ulcer relapse incidence between patients initially healed with H2-antagonists and patients initially healed with non-H2-antagonist drugs were calculated. The overall incidence of relapse in patients healed with comparator drugs is 11 percentage units lower at six and 12 months, than that observed in H2-antagonist-healed patients. The confidence intervals are +/- 8% at six months and +/- 7% at 12 months. These data suggest the existence of a different effect on relapse incidence for the entire class of comparator drugs taken as a whole, compared with H2-antagonists. On considering the non-H2-antagonists singly, this conclusion holds good only in the case of tripotassium dicitrato bismuthate.

Omeprazole vs. ranitidine in the short-term treatment of duodenal ulcer: an Italian multicenter study

A double-blind, double-dummy, randomized Italian multicenter trial was carried out to compare the efficacy and safety of omeprazole 20 mg in the morning and ranitidine 150 mg b.i.d. in short-term treatment of acute duodenal ulcer. One hundred and twenty-one patients (61 in the omeprazole and 60 in the ranitidine group) with endoscopically proven active duodenal ulcer, completed the study. The healing rates after 2, 4 and 6 weeks were 66, 97 and 100%, respectively, with omeprazole and 53, 85 and 92%, respectively, with ranitidine. The difference was statistically significant (p less than 0.05) at weeks 4 and 6. Night and day pain were markedly reduced during both treatments, as also antacid consumption. Both drugs were well tolerated, and the adverse events were infrequent and moderate. In our experience, omeprazole 20 mg once daily seems to be superior to ranitidine 150 mg b.i.d. in the short-term treatment of duodenal ulcer.

Short-term treatment of reflux oesophagitis with ranitidine 300 mg nocte. Italian multicentre study

A multicentre study involving 9 Italian institutions was carried out to compare the efficacy and safety of ranitidine 150 mg b.i.d. and ranitidine 300 mg nocte in the treatment of reflux oesophagitis. 117 patients with histologically proven oesophagitis were randomly allocated to two comparable treatment groups. Efficacy and reliability were evaluated by clinical and laboratory tests at the beginning of the study, and at 3 and 6 weeks; endoscopy and biopsies were performed at the beginning and at 6 weeks. Treatment with ranitidine for 6 weeks led to total disappearance of gastro-oesophageal reflux symptoms in 60% of patients, with percentages of partial improvement varying between 85% and 95% of cases. Improvement in the results of endoscopic examination was 85%, of which 55% were cured. Microscopic examination revealed an improvement of 36% and 44%, with a cure rate of 18% and 26% respectively. With regard neither to the regression of symptoms nor to the macroscopic and microscopic inflammation of the oesophageal mucosa did statistical examination show significant differences in the therapeutic efficacy of ranitidine 150 mg b.i.d. or 300 mg nocte for treatment of reflux oesophagitis.

Comparison of once-daily bedtime administration of famotidine and ranitidine in the short-term treatment of duodenal ulcer. A multicenter, double-blind, controlled study

A multicenter, double-blind, randomized, controlled study was conducted in 234 duodenal ulcer patients to compare the efficacy and safety of the H2-receptor antagonists famotidine and ranitidine in the treatment of duodenal ulcer. Patients received 40 mg famotidine (119 patients) or 300 mg ranitidine (115 patients) once daily at bedtime for 4 weeks. If ulcer lesions persisted, treatment was extended to 6 weeks. Efficacy was assessed by relief of symptoms and endoscopic findings of ulcer healing. Safety was determined on the basis of reports of side effects, results of laboratory tests, and, in selected patients, changes in plasma levels of hormones. The 4- and 6-week healing rates achieved with famotidine were 76% and 91%, respectively, and with ranitidine they were 76% and 87%, respectively; the differences in healing rates for the two drugs were not statistically significant. Similarly, both drugs provided satisfactory relief of pain and dyspeptic symptoms. However, famotidine produced significantly (P less than 0.05) greater relief of postprandial fullness and heartburn. The incidence of untoward effects was low in both treatment groups, and abnormal results in laboratory tests were observed in only one patient, a chronic alcoholic receiving famotidine, who withdrew from the study because of a slight elevation in serum transaminase levels. One patient in the ranitidine treatment group dropped out of the study because of a generalized urticarial rash; however, a causal relationship between drug and effect could not be established. The authors conclude that famotidine may be regarded as the best alternative to ranitidine in the treatment of duodenal ulcer.

Inhibitory effect of famotidine on cat gastric secretion

The inhibitory effect of the novel H2 receptor antagonist famotidine was studied in conscious gastric fistula cats against dimaprit-induced hypersecretion, in comparison with ranitidine. On the secretory plateau induced by dimaprit (2 mumol kg-1 h-1) famotidine (0.05-0.2 mumol kg-1 i.v.) exerted a dose-dependent inhibitory effect, being approximately 4.5 times as potent as ranitidine (ID50 values were 0.067 +/- 0.015 and 0.30 +/- 0.025 mumol kg-1 for famotidine and ranitidine, respectively). No significant differences were found between the two drugs, as for the time-course of the inhibitory effect. Famotidine (0.01-0.32 mumol kg-1 h-1) caused a parallel displacement of the dose-response curve to dimaprit to the right, without reducing the maximum response to the stimulant, thus behaving as a competitive antagonist, like ranitidine. pA2 values for famotidine and ranitidine were 7.95 and 6.92, respectively. In the same range of doses famotidine dose-dependently reduced also the secretory response to histamine. From these data it was concluded that famotidine is a potent histamine H2 receptor antagonist in the cat gastric mucosa; moreover, conversely from "in vitro" data, the antagonism was surmountable even at the highest doses tested. In vivo experiment, therefore, did not reveal any particular feature of this compound, apart from the undoubtedly high potency, in comparison with other members of the family.

Comparison between ranitidine 150 mg b.d. and ranitidine 300 mg nocte in the treatment of duodenal ulcer

A multicenter trial was undertaken to assess the clinical usefulness of a single night-time dose of ranitidine in the short-term healing of duodenal ulcer. 384 patients with endoscopically diagnosed duodenal ulcer were randomly allocated to treatment with ranitidine either 150 mg b.d. or 300 mg as a single night-time dose for four weeks. The patients not healed after four weeks were again treated for four weeks. Of the 356 patients who completed the study, according to the protocol, 148 of 176 (84.1%) recovered on ranitidine 150 mg b.d. and 147 of 180 (81.7%) recovered on 300 mg nocte after four weeks. The healing rates increased to 95.8% and 94.8% respectively after four more weeks. Ulcer symptoms were rapidly reduced with no significant differences between the two treatment groups. There were no unwanted effects in either group and no significant abnormal biochemical or hematological changes. The results of this study support the hypothesis that ranitidine 300 mg given as one night-time dose and ranitidine 150 mg b.d. are equally effective. Ranitidine 300 mg once daily in a clinical practice may be advantageous to the patient.

CA 19-9 assay in differential diagnosis of pancreatic carcinoma from inflammatory pancreatic diseases

Levels of a new carbohydrate antigen CA 19-9, which is a monosialoganglioside identified by a monoclonal antibody raised against colorectal carcinoma cells, were compared to carcinoembryonic antigen and tissue polypeptide antigen assays in 250 sera from patients with different pancreatic diseases including acute pancreatitis, chronic pancreatitis, and pancreatic cancer. All three tumoral markers were elevated at the onset of an acute pancreatic attack in a few patients. All but five patients with chronic pancreatitis displayed normal levels with each of the three markers; in two of these five cases an extraintestinal cancer was later discovered. CA 19-9 displayed higher sensitivity and predictive value of a negative result than the other two markers. The best operational characteristic of CA 19-9 was its high predictive value for a positive test which suggests a "ruling in" usage of it for pancreatic cancer diagnosis. CA 19-9 assay was of extreme value in disclosing both localized and metastatic pancreatic cancer while the other two markers were more often positive in the latter case. Of 71 cancer patients with positive markers, only four would have escaped a right diagnosis by assaying CA 19-9 alone.