Five waves of COVID-19 pandemic in Italy: results of a national survey evaluating the impact on activities related to arrhythmias, pacing, and electrophysiology promoted by AIAC (Italian Association of Arrhythmology and Cardiac Pacing)

BACKGROUND

The subsequent waves of the COVID-19 pandemic in Italy had a major impact on cardiac care.

METHODS

A survey to evaluate the dynamic changes in arrhythmia care during the first five waves of COVID-19 in Italy (first: March-May 2020; second: October 2020-January 2021; third: February-May 2021; fourth: June-October 2021; fifth: November 2021-February 2022) was launched.

RESULTS

A total of 127 physicians from arrhythmia centers (34% of Italian centers) took part in the survey. As compared to 2019, a reduction in 40% of elective pacemaker (PM), defibrillators (ICD), and cardiac resynchronization devices (CRT) implantations, with a 70% reduction for ablations, was reported during the first wave, with a progressive and gradual return to pre-pandemic volumes, generally during the third-fourth waves, slower for ablations. For emergency procedures (PM, ICD, CRT, and ablations), recovery from the initial 10% decline occurred in most cases during the second wave, with some variability. However, acute care for atrial fibrillation, electrical cardioversions, and evaluations for syncope showed a prolonged reduction of activity. The number of patients with devices which started remote monitoring increased by 40% during the first wave, but then the adoption of remote monitoring declined.

CONCLUSIONS

The dramatic and profound derangement in arrhythmia management that characterized the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic was followed by a progressive return to the volume of activities of the pre-pandemic periods, even if with different temporal dynamics and some heterogeneity. Remote monitoring was largely implemented during the first wave, but full implementation is needed.

Third-generation laser balloon ablation for atrial fibrillation treatment: a multicenter experience

Background

Laser balloon ablation is a promising option for performing pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) which is the cornerstone of invasive atrial fibrillation (AF) treatment.

Purpose

We aimed to investigate the acute efficacy and safety of the novel third-generation of the laser balloon system in an initial multicenter experience.

Methods

First and consecutive patients who underwent PVI with LB3 for drug-resistant paroxysmal or persistent AF at 7 Italian sites were included in this analysis. Study endpoints were acute procedural efficacy, defined as successful isolation of all identified PVs without radiofrequency touch-up, total and fluoroscopy times, and periprocedural complications.

Results

Our population included 86 patients (81% males, mean age 60.6±9.5 years) who underwent a procedure of PVI using LB3 between June 2020 and March 2021.

Most patients had paroxysmal AF (74%) and were in sinus rhythm at the beginning of the procedure. The mean procedure time was 138±60 min; fluoroscopy time was 22±17 min and the mean ablation time was 44±40 min. Of the 313 targeted PVs, 311 (99.4%) could be isolated with first-pass LB3 application, while 2 (0.6%) required radiofrequency touchup. At the end of the procedure, all patients were in sinus rhythm and 26 (32%) received electrical cardioversion to achieve stable sinus rhythm.

The total rate of major compilations was 1.2% (1/82 patients): one pericardial tamponade requiring epicardial puncture. No surgical intervention was necessary, and the patient recovered without any sequalae. There were no vascular access complications or phrenic nervy palsy. Three pinhole balloon raptures (3.5%) were observed during energy applications that required replacement of the whole system but had no effect on patient safety.

Conclusions

In a first multicenter experience, the LB3 system for PVI was safe with excellent acute efficacy.

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding sources: None.

P5238Rate, cause and costs of Heart Failure hospitalizations following ICD/CRT-D replacement: preliminary data from an Italian multicenter registry

Background

Heart failure hospitalizations (HFHs) likely represent the main health care expenditure also in implantable cardiac defibrillators (ICDs) and cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillators (CRT-D) recipients yet the event rate of HFH and the associated costs after device replacement or upgrade are unknown.

Purpose

To report HFH rates and associated costs within 12 months following ICD/CRT-D device replacement or upgrade procedure from ICD to CRT-D.

Methods

The DEtect long-term COmplications after icD rEplacement (DECODE) was a prospective, single-arm, multicenter cohort study exploring complications in ICD/CRT-D recipients undergoing device replacement or upgrade from ICD to CRT-D. All clinical and survival data of these patients at 12-month follow-up were prospectively analyzed. For each adjudicated HFH, the admission and discharge date were recorded, and ICD-9-CM diagnoses and procedure codes were obtained. The estimated reimbursement for each hospitalization was calculated according to the 2012 Italian national reimbursement rates.

Results

Between 2013 and 2015, 983 patients (mean age = 71 years, mean LVEF = 35%, NYHA class I/II = 75.6%) were enrolled: 900 (91.6%) patients underwent device replacement (446 ICD/454 CRT-D) and 83 (8.4%) upgrade from ICD to CRT-D. After 12 months, 66 (6.7%) patients died, 40 (60.6%) for cardiovascular reasons. Fifty-five (5.6%) patients experienced at least 1 HFH. Overall, 91 HFH (9.6% event rate 95% CI, 7.7–11.7) occurred. Among the variables tested at univariate analysis, only LVEF ≤35%, AF history and renal disease were confirmed as HFH predictors at multivariate analysis. HFH rate was significantly higher following upgrade procedures and occurrence of HFH was associated with an eleven-fold increased mortality risk (95% CI: 5.9 to 20.5; p<0.0001). The cumulative cost associated with HFHs incurred over the 12 months follow-up was 515305 €. The mean cost per HFH was 5662±9497 € [ranging from 3144 € to 64479 €] while the mean cost per patient with events was 9369±12687 €.

Conclusion

Underlying cardiac disease and renal failure are the main drivers of HFH and mortality, and of higher healthcare expenditures in ICD/CRT-D recipients following device replacement or upgrade. Accurate clinical assessment is needed to support the decision-maker at the time of ICD replacement to take an appropriate clinical and economic sustainable decision.

Acknowledgement/Funding

None