Different response to the long-acting somatostatin analogues lanreotide and octreotide in a patient with a malignant carcinoid

INTRODUCTION

Somatostatin (SST) analogues are cornerstones in the symptomatic management of patients suffering from carcinoid tumors, and antiproliferative activity has also been reported for these agents. The most commonly applied SST analogues are octreotide (OCT) and lanreotide (LAN), which are both available in a slow release formulation. To the current knowledge, both OCT and LAN are thought to be equally effective for the management of various disorders. We report the case of a patient with a disseminated carcinoid, who progressed during dose-intensified treatment with slow-release LAN in combination with interferon-alpha, but developed a pronounced response after treatment was switched to the application of a depot formulation of OCT.

CASE REPORT

A 46-year-old woman was admitted to our department for the evaluation of persistent flushing, diarrhea and dyspnea. After a diagnosis of metastatic carcinoid had been established, treatment with LAN (30 mg i.m. every 10 days) along with interferon-alpha 3 x 5 MU/week was initiated. In spite of successful blocking of tumoral SST receptors as judged by SST receptor scintigraphy and subjective improvement of symptoms, the patient had progressive disease. As she refused chemotherapy, treatment was switched to a depot formulation of OCT (20 mg i.m. every 4 weeks), resulting both in a disappearance of symptoms as well as tumor regression as seen on CT scanning.

CONCLUSION

To our knowledge, this is the first case demonstrating both a symptomatic as well as objective response to OCT following progression during therapy with LAN in a patient with a carcinoid tumor. Our results suggest that refractoriness to treatment including a long-acting SST analogue does not automatically imply resistance to a related agent and should alert clinicians to the potential of non-cross-resistance between SST analogues in neuroendocrine malignancies.

Treatment of advanced gastric cancer with oral etoposide, leucovorin and tegafur: experience with an oral modification of the etoposide, leucovorin and 5-fluorouracil (ELF) regimen

Recent data have suggested enhanced therapeutic activity with prolonged administration of both etoposide as well as fluoropyrimidines in the treatment of gastrointestinal malignancies. Based on this rationale, we investigated the clinical effectiveness and tolerance of an oral modification of the widely applied etoposide, leucovorin and 5-fluorouracil (ELF) regimen in patients with advanced gastric cancer. 32 patients with advanced gastric cancer were treated with oral etoposide (100 mg), leucovorin (3 x 100 mg), and tegafur (3 x 200 mg) over 14-21 days for a maximum of six cycles. Objective response was seen in only 5 patients (16%), stable disease was documented in 7 (22%), while the remaining patients progressed during therapy. The median time to progression was 2.8 months (range 0.7-12 months) and median overall survival was 6 months (range 1-18+ months). Due to grade 3 nausea/emesis, 8 patients discontinued treatment prematurely, while 12 patients experienced anorexia and progressive weight loss. Haematological toxicity was modest, with 4 patients developing asymptomatic grade 3-4 granulocytopenia. We conclude that this oral combination regimen cannot be recommended for the treatment of advanced gastric cancer.

Association between Helicobacter pylori infection and pancreatic cancer

PURPOSE

In order to determine whether infection with Helicobacter pylori might be associated with pancreatic adenocarcinoma, we performed a study to compare the H. pylori seroprevalence rate between patients with pancreatic carcinoma and matched control subjects.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Blood samples from 92 patients with histologically confirmed diagnosis of pancreatic adenocarcinoma admitted to our hospital between January 1994 and July 1995 were analyzed for the presence of IgG antibodies against H. pylori by a commercially available enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Thirty patients with gastric cancer, 35 patients with colorectal cancer, and 27 healthy volunteers served as controls. In addition to these serological analyses, tumor specimens from 20 patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma were microscopically investigated for the presence of H. pylori.

RESULTS

65% of pancreatic cancer patients and 69% of those with gastric cancer were found to be seropositive, while only 45% of the other controls tested positive. Statistical analysis revealed no difference in seropositivity between the cohort of patients suffering from pancreatic and gastric cancer. The rate of seropositivity was more prominent, however, in pancreatic cancer patients when compared with those suffering from colorectal cancer combined with normal controls (p = 0.035), with an odds ratio of 2.1 (1.1-4.1). Microscopic evaluation of human pancreatic cancer specimens showed no evidence for the presence of H. pylori.

CONCLUSION

Our data suggest an association between H. pylori infection and pancreatic cancer. Despite demonstration of a positive relationship and its physiological plausibility, larger prospective studies are needed to confirm our preliminary findings and to assess H. pylori as a potential carcinogenic risk factor.

Treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer with epirubicin, 5-fluorouracil and 1-leucovorin: a phase II study

BACKGROUND

Preclinical data suggest that the levorotatory isomer of leucovorin (1-LV) can augment the cytotoxic effects of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) more effectively than racemic LV. A phase II study was initiated to evaluate the effect of a combination of the pure L-isomer of LV and 5-FU along with epirubicin in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Twenty-eight consecutive, previously untreated patients with measurable metastatic adenocarcinoma of the pancreas were enrolled in this study. Treatment consisted of epirubicin 50 mg/m2 on day 1 and 5-FU 400 mg/m2 plus 1-LV 100 mg/m2 both administered on days 1 to 5. Treatment cycles were repeated every four weeks for a total of six months unless progressive disease was documented earlier. The study endpoints were survival, toxicity, objective response as well as palliative beneficial effects of the regimen in terms of performance status, body weight and pain.

RESULTS

Six patients had a partial response (21%; 95% CI, 8% to 44%) and 10 (36%) stable disease (35%), while the remaining 12 patients (43%) progressed during treatment. The median time to treatment failure was 2.9 months (range 1.2-13.7 months), and the median survival time was six months (range 1.8-19 months), with three patients (11%) being alive after one year. Beneficial palliative effects in terms of performance status, body weight and/or pain were seen in 12 of 28 patients (43%): an improvement in performance status was recorded in four patients, pain was attenuated and/or analgetic consumption reduced by > or = 50% in eight patients, and five patients had weight gain of > 5% of their pretreatment body weight. Treatment-associated side effects were generally mild to moderate. Severe adverse reactions included (asymptomatic) granulocytopenia in five, mucositis and/or diarrhea WHO grade 3 in four patients.

CONCLUSION

Our data suggest that epirubicin plus 5-FU and 1-LV is a tolerable regimen that has some positive effects in the treatment of pancreatic cancer. Since this regimen, however, is unlikely to offer any major therapeutic advantage compared to monochemotherapy or other combination regimens, the search for novel and more effective cytotoxic agents must continue.

Comparison of iodine-123-vasoactive intestinal peptide receptor scintigraphy and indium-111-CYT-103 immunoscintigraphy

Recently, we have shown that the expression of receptors for vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP) on intestinal adenocarcinomas can be used for in vivo targeting of primary or metastatic tumor sites using 123I-labeled VIP. Several other receptors and antigens including the TAG-72 protein have also been implemented for in vivo localization purposes. In this study, we have compared the in vitro and in vivo binding of 123I-VIP and of the 111In-labeled monoclonal antibody (MAb) directed against TAG-72 (OncoScint; 111In-CR-103) in patients with intestinal adenocarcinomas in a single-blinded, prospectively randomized trial.

METHODS

Twenty patients were administered either 123I-VIP (150-200 MBq; 1 microgram) or 111In-CYT-103 (150 MBq; 1 mg) for one imaging study. After interim analysis demonstrated superior imaging with 123I-VIP, the next 10 patients (accounting for a total of 50 patients) enrolled in this trial underwent both studies in random order to allow for a direct comparison.

RESULTS

In total, 123I-VIP scans were true-positive in 28 of 30 patients (93%) versus 17 of 30 patients administered 111In-CYT-103 (56%). In the subgroup of 10 patients enrolled in the second part of the study, primary intestinal adenocarcinomas were imaged in five of five patients with 123I-VIP and in only two of these patients with 111In-CYT-103. Liver metastases were visualized in five of six patients by 123I-VIP receptor scanning and in four of these patients with 111In-CYT-103. The in vitro results indicated significant binding of 123I-VIP to primary colorectal tumors as well as to HT29 and COLO320 adenocarcinoma cells. In vitro, adenocarcinoma cells also expressed abundant numbers of the TAG-72 antigen.

CONCLUSION

Intestinal adenocarcinomas co-express VIP receptors and the IAG-72 antigen. Despite significant in vitro binding of both agents, however, the VIP receptor scan is more sensitive in localizing intestinal adenocarcinomas and metastatic spread.