Long-Acting Lipoglycopeptides for the Treatment of Bone and Joint Infections

Background: The long-acting lipoglycopeptides dalbavancin and oritavancin possess excellent microbiologic activity against gram-positive bacteria and provide prolonged tissue exposure at sites of infection. Moreover, these antibiotics are well tolerated and do not require therapeutic drug monitoring. Methods: Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic experiments ascertained that one to two doses of these long-acting agents can provide an extended period (≥6 weeks) of antimicrobial therapy. Results: Clinical studies subsequently found that microbiologic and clinical response rates with these agents were comparable to standard antibiotic agents used in the treatment of bone and joint infections. In addition, pharmacoeconomic analyses have discovered cost savings with the use of these antimicrobial agents in the treatment of serious deep-seated bacterial infections. Conclusions: Thus, these long-acting lipoglycopeptides offer potential for cost-effective outpatient parenteral antibiotic therapy of difficult to treat infections, such as osteomyelitis.

Plazomicin: A New Aminoglycoside

Plazomicin (ACHN-490) is a novel parenteral aminoglycoside developed to target multidrug-resistant Enterobacteriaceae. It has recently been approved by the Food and Drug Administration for the management of complicated urinary tract infections and pyelonephritis caused by susceptible organisms. When compared with meropenem, plazomicin was not inferior. The adverse-event profile for plazomicin was comparable to meropenem except for an increased additional rise in serum creatinine in the plazomicin arm compared with the meropenem arm. This review focuses on the mode of action, antimicrobial activity, pharmacokinetics, clinical indications, and safety profile of this drug. Considerations for formulary addition and its place in therapy are also discussed.

Monte Carlo Simulation Methodologies for β-Lactam/β-Lactamase Inhibitor Combinations: Effect on Probability of Target Attainment Assessments

Monte Carlo simulations (MCSs) are used in antibiotic development to predict the probability of pharmacodynamic target attainment (PTA) for a dosing regimen. However, for β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations (BL-BLICs), methods for linking simulated concentration profiles of the β-lactam (BL) and β-lactamase inhibitor (BLI) components are rarely described. Using a previously defined pharmacokinetic model of ceftazidime/avibactam from critically ill patients, we performed four 5000-patient MCSs using different methods of increasing complexity to couple the BL and BLI components and compared PTA for ceftazidime and avibactam targets of >70% fT>MIC and >70% fT>1 mg/L, respectively, at MICs from 1 to 128 mg/L. Method A ignored all covariates and correlations, whereas methods B, C, and D enhanced associations by adding (B) pharmacokinetic parameter correlation within each drug only; (C) pharmacokinetic parameter correlation within each drug and creatinine clearance (CRCL); and (D) pharmacokinetic parameter correlation within each drug, CRCL, and pharmacokinetic parameter correlation between drugs. Method D produced a simulated patient population that best recapitulated the observed relationships between pharmacokinetic parameters in actual patients. Ceftazidime/avibactam PTA at MIC 8 mg/L (the susceptibility break point) and 16 mg/L ranged from 92.4% to 98.3% and 80.2% to 88.4%, respectively. PTA was lowest with method A, whereas PTA estimates were similar for all other methods. Compared with ignoring all pharmacokinetic parameter associations, the inclusion of covariate relationships and parameter correlation between both components of ceftazidime/avibactam leads to fewer patients with discordant pharmacokinetic parameters and results in higher PTA. Consideration of these methodologies should guide future MCS analyses for BL-BLIC.

Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Analysis of Ceftazidime/Avibactam in Critically Ill Patients

BACKGROUND

The pharmacokinetics, especially the volume of distribution (Vd), of ß-lactam antibiotics can be altered in critically ill patients. This can lead to decreased serum concentrations and a reduction in clinical cures. Ceftazidime/avibactam (CZA) is a new antimicrobial agent utilized in critically ill patients although its pharmacokinetics has not been well defined in these patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In this study, the serum concentrations of CZA from adult patients treated in an intensive care unit (ICU) with standard dosing regimens were measured and both pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters were computed. The pharmacodynamic analyses included Monte Carlo simulations to determine the probability of target attainment (PTA: free ceftazidime concentrations exceed the minimum inhibitory concentration [MIC] for 50% of the dosing interval; free avibactam concentrations exceed 1 mg/L over the dosing interval) and serum time-kill curves against multi-drug-resistant Enterobacteriaceae susceptible to CZA. Serum concentrations were measured in 10 critically ill patients at two, four, six, and eight hours after multiple doses (infused over two hours) of CZA.

RESULTS

A significant linear relation between creatinine clearance and total body clearance was identified for both ceftazidime (R = 0.91) and avibactam (R = 0.88). The mean clearance, volume of distribution, and half-life for ceftazidime were 6.1 ± 3.8 L/h, 35 ± 10.5 L, and 4.8 ± 2.15 h, respectively. For avibactam, these values were 11.1 ± 6.8 L/h, 50.8 ± 14.3 L, and 4.1 ± 2.1 h, respectively. Ceftazidime/avibactam achieved optimal PTA for bacteria with MICs of 16 mg/L or less. Furthermore, time-kill experiments revealed that serum concentrations of CZA, at each collection time, exhibited bactericidal (≥ 3 log₁₀ CFU/mL reduction) activity against each of the study isolates.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, our study results suggest that the current dosing regimens of CZA can provide effective antimicrobial activity in ICU patients against CZA-susceptible (MIC ≤8 mg/L) isolates.

Profile of oritavancin and its potential in the treatment of acute bacterial skin structure infections

Oritavancin, a semisynthetic derivative of the glycopeptide antibiotic chloroeremomycin, received the US Food and Drug Administration approval for the treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections caused by susceptible Gram-positive bacteria in adults in August 2014. This novel second-generation semisynthetic lipoglycopeptide antibiotic has activity against a broad spectrum of Gram-positive bacteria, including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), vancomycin-intermediate S. aureus (VISA), and vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus. Oritavancin inhibits bacterial cell wall synthesis and is rapidly bactericidal against many Gram-positive pathogens. The long half-life of this drug enables a single-dose administration. Oritavancin is not metabolized in the body, and the unchanged drug is slowly excreted by the kidneys. In two large Phase III randomized, double-blind, clinical trials, oritavancin was found to be non-inferior to vancomycin in achieving the primary composite end point in the treatment of acute Gram-positive skin and skin structure infections. Adverse effects noted were mostly mild with nausea, headache, and vomiting being the most common reported side effects. Oritavancin has emerged as another useful antimicrobial agent for treatment of acute Gram-positive skin and skin structure infections, including those caused by MRSA and VISA.

Oritavancin: A Long-Half-Life Lipoglycopeptide

Oritavancin is a lipoglycopeptide antibiotic that has been shown to be effective for the treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSIs). This antibiotic has multiple mechanisms of action including inhibiting peptidoglycan cell wall synthesis and disrupting bacterial cell membrane, leading to cell death. Oritavancin is highly active against common gram-positive pathogens including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, vancomycin-intermediate S. aureus, vancomycin-resistant S. aureus, and vancomycin-resistant enterococci. The drug is administered as a single intravenous dose of 1200 mg over 3 hours in adult patients, and because of its terminal half-life of 393 hours, repeat dosing is not required in the treatment of ABSSIs. There is a very slow elimination from tissue sites, and no dosing adjustments are required for renal or hepatic insufficiency. Two clinical trials have demonstrated noninferiority compared with vancomycin in the treatment of ABSSSIs. Other than liver enzyme elevation and the occurrence of osteomyelitis, oritavancin has been associated with adverse events similar to those of vancomycin in follow-up for up to 60 days. Patients should be monitored for osteomyelitis and alternate therapy given in the case of confirmed or suspected osteomyelitis. Although oritavancin is an attractive antibiotic to consider in the outpatient area, its efficacy and safety in the treatment of other sites of infection are yet to be established.

A pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic analysis of ceftaroline prophylaxis in patients with external ventricular drains

BACKGROUND

Ceftaroline is a broad-spectrum cephalosporin antibiotic with activity against drug-resistant bacteria, including strains of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), and may be useful to prevent and treat ventriculostomy-related infections (VRIs). The purpose of this study was to analyze the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of prophylactic ceftaroline in neurosurgical patients with an external ventricular drain (EVD).

METHODS

Adult patients in the neurosurgical intensive care unit with an EVD were given prolonged prophylaxis with ceftaroline. Serum and cerebral spinal fluid (CSF) were obtained simultaneously at 2, 6, and 12 h after initiation of the fourth dose of ceftaroline and concentrations were measured by a liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry assay. Time-kill curves against isolates of coagulase-negative S. aureus, methicillin-sensitive S. aureus, MRSA, and Streptococcus pneumoniae were determined in serum and CSF at each collection time point.

RESULTS

A total of five patients with a mean age of 63 y and mean weight of 83 kg were enrolled. The mean CSF:serum penetration ratios of ceftaroline were 0.005 (0.5%), 0.021 (2.1%), and 0.043 (4.3%) at 2, 6, and 12 h, respectively. The mean ceftaroline exposure ratio area under the curve (AUC)csf/AUCserum) was 0.011 (1.1%). Bactericidal activity at each collection time point was observed against each strain of staphylococci from serum samples and a penicillin-sensitive strain of S. pneumoniae from CSF samples.

CONCLUSION

This investigation suggests that ceftaroline could have clinical utility for the prevention of VRIs in patients with EVDs.

Higher clinical success in patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus treated with linezolid compared with vancomycin: results from the IMPACT-HAP study

Introduction

Controversy exists regarding optimal treatment for ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). The primary objective of this study was to compare clinical success of linezolid versus vancomycin for the treatment of patients with MRSA VAP.

Methods

This was a multicenter, retrospective, observational study of patients with VAP (defined according to Centers for Disease Control and Prevention criteria) due to MRSA who were treated with linezolid or vancomycin. MRSA VAP was considered when MRSA was isolated from a tracheal aspirate or bronchoalveolar lavage. Clinical success was evaluated by assessing improvement or resolution of signs and symptoms of VAP by day 14. After matching on confounding factors, logistic regression models were used to determine if an association existed between treatment arm and clinical success.

Results

A total of 188 patients were evaluated (101 treated with linezolid and 87 with vancomycin). The mean ± standard deviation Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II score was 21 ± 11 for linezolid- and 19 ± 9 for vancomycin-treated patients (P = 0.041). Clinical success occurred in 85% of linezolid-treated patients compared with 69% of vancomycin-treated patients (P = 0.009). After adjusting for confounding factors, linezolid-treated patients were 24% more likely to experience clinical success than vancomycin-treated patients (P = 0.018).

Conclusions

This study adds to the evidence indicating that patients with MRSA VAP who are treated with linezolid are more likely to respond favorably compared with patients treated with vancomycin.

Tigecycline: an update

Tigecycline is a broad-spectrum antibiotic with activity against difficult-to-treat pathogens such as methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus spp., Acinetobacter baumannii, and Gram-negative bacterial strains that produce extended-spectrum β-lactamases. Minimal organ toxicity and lack of dosage adjustment in most patients are important considerations for tigecycline use. Tigecycline has been shown to be as effective and safe as standard antimicrobial therapy for treatment of adults with complicated intra-abdominal infections, complicated skin and skin structure infections, and community-acquired bacterial pneumonia. The clearest applications of tigecycline are for on-label indications. Whether tigecycline should be utilized as therapy for other infections including hospital-acquired infections with a high likelihood of multidrug-resistant pathogens is a complex issue that requires ongoing assessment. This article offers an updated overview of tigecycline clinical studies, current microbial resistance patterns, pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic investigations, and safety analyses.

Pharmacokinetics and monte carlo simulations of doripenem in patients with febrile neutropenia

BACKGROUND

Doripenem is a group 2 carbapenem with enhanced in vitro activity against gram-negative bacteria including Pseudomonas aeruginosa. There is a paucity of pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic data on doripenem in patients with febrile neutropenia.

OBJECTIVE

To conduct a pharmacokinetic evaluation of 2 doses of doripenem in patients with febrile neutropenia and provide probability estimates of attaining effective drug exposure against common gram-negative pathogens.

METHODS

We obtained multiple blood samples from 12 adults with febrile neutropenia who were receiving either 500 mg or 1000 mg of intravenous doripenem over 4 hours every 8 hours. Following at least 2 doses, serum concentrations were measured in each subject at 1, 4, 6, and 8 hours after initiation of a dose by a validated high-performance liquid chromatography assay. The derived pharmacokinetic parameters from these serum levels were used to perform a 5000-patient Monte Carlo simulation against bacteria with minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of 0.008-64 mg/L to determine probability estimates of the time in which unbound drug concentrations remain above the MIC (fT(>MIC)).

RESULTS

The mean pharmacokinetic parameters in these patients were a volume of distribution of 43.9 L, an elimination rate constant of 0.37 h(-1), a total clearance of 14.4 L/h, and an area under the concentration-time curve of 57.6 mg•h/L. An optimal probability of target attainment (40% fT(>MIC)) of 90% was obtained against bacteria with MICs ≤2 mg/L and ≤4 mg/L with 500-mg and 1000-mg doses, respectively. Adverse events associated with doripenem were not observed.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings from this analysis of doripenem suggest that higher doses, as well as prolonged infusions, may be necessary to optimally treat selected gram-negative bacteria (eg, P. aeruginosa) in patients with febrile neutropenia.

Summary of ceftaroline fosamil clinical trial studies and clinical safety

In October 2010, the new cephalosporin, ceftaroline fosamil, was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for therapy of community-acquired bacterial pneumonia (CABP) and acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSIs). The active metabolite, ceftaroline, demonstrates in vitro activity against typical bacterial pathogens most often associated with CABP or ABSSSIs, including resistant Gram-positive pathogens such as multidrug-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. The efficacy and safety of ceftaroline fosamil was assessed in 2 large phase 3 programs of randomized, double-blind, clinical trials for CABP and ABSSSIs. For both indications, therapy with ceftaroline fosamil was observed to be noninferior to the comparator agents (ceftriaxone for CABP and vancomycin plus aztreonam for ABSSSIs) at both a standard test of cure assessment time (8-15 days after discontinuation of study drug) and an early assessment time point (day 3 or 4 of study). In the integrated analysis of the trials for CABP (FOCUS 1 and 2), clinical cure rates for the ceftaroline group were numerically higher than those for the ceftriaxone group (for the clinically evaluable population 84.3% vs 77.7%; difference: 6.6%; 95% confidence interval, 1.6%-11.8%). Among patients with CABP caused by S. pneumoniae, clinical cure rates were markedly higher in the ceftaroline treatment group than in the ceftriaxone treatment group (59 of 69 [85.5%] vs 48 of 70 [68.6%], respectively). For the ABSSSI studies (CANVAS 1 and 2), microbiologically evaluable (ME) success rates were similar between the treatment groups. Notably, the clinical cure rates in ME patients with methicillin-resistant S. aureus ABSSSIs were 142 of 152 (93.4%) and 115 of 122 (94.3%), for ceftaroline and vancomycin plus aztreonam, respectively, and did not differ from those achieved in infections due to methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (93.0%-94.5%). Ceftaroline fosamil was well tolerated, with a safety profile similar to the comparator agents used in these phase 3 trials.

Ceftaroline: a novel cephalosporin with activity against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus

Ceftaroline (PPI 0903, formerly TAK-599), the active metabolite of a N-phosphono prodrug, ceftaroline fosamil, has been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections and community-acquired bacterial pneumonia. This antimicrobial agent binds to penicillin binding proteins (PBP) inhibiting cell wall synthesis and has a high affinity for PBP2a, which is associated with methicillin resistance. Ceftaroline is consistently active against multidrug-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae and Staphylococcus aureus, including methicillin-resistant, vancomycin-intermediate, linezolid-resistant, and daptomycin-nonsusceptible strains. It possesses variable activity against Enterobacteriaceae and good activity against oral anaerobes. The drug is usually administrated intravenously at 600 mg every 12 h. Ceftaroline has low protein binding and is excreted by the kidneys and thus requires dose adjustments in individuals with renal failure. Clinical trials have demonstrated noninferiority when compared with vancomycin in the treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections and noninferiority when compared with ceftriaxone in the treatment of community-acquired bacterial pneumonia. Ceftaroline demonstrated a safety profile similar to that of comparator drugs in clinical trials.

Therapeutic options for diabetic foot infections: a review with an emphasis on tissue penetration characteristics

Foot complications are common in diabetic patients; foot ulcers are among the more serious consequences. These ulcers frequently become infected, and if not treated promptly and appropriately, diabetic foot infections can lead to septic gangrene and amputation. Foot infections may be classified as mild, moderate, or severe; this largely determines the approach to therapy. Staphylococcus aureus is the most common pathogen in these infections, and the increasing incidence of methicillin-resistant S aureus during the past two decades has further complicated antibiotic treatment. Chronic infections are often polymicrobial. Physiologic changes, and local and systemic inflammation, can affect the plasma and tissue pharmacokinetics of antimicrobial agents in diabetic patients, leading to impaired target-site penetration. Knowledge of the serum and tissue concentrations of antibiotics in diabetic patients is, therefore, important for choosing the optimal drug and dose. This article reviews the commonly used therapeutic options for treatment, including many newer antibiotics developed to target multidrug-resistant gram-positive bacteria, and includes available data relating specifically to the tissue penetration of these agents.

The importance of tissue penetration in achieving successful antimicrobial treatment of nosocomial pneumonia and complicated skin and soft-tissue infections caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: vancomycin and linezolid

BACKGROUND

The rising prevalence of nosocomial methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and the recent emergence of community-associated MRSA are major clinical, public health, and economic challenges. MRSA is a leading cause of nosocomial pneumonia and complicated skin and soft-tissue infections (cSSTI). Vancomycin and linezolid are two commonly used antimicrobial agents with activity against Gram-positive pathogens, particularly MRSA, that are used to treat both nosocomial pneumonia and cSSTI. Recently, the therapeutic efficacy of vancomycin in the treatment of hospitalized patients with MRSA infections has been questioned due to the emergence of MRSA strains with reduced susceptibility to vancomycin together with concerns related to inadequate dosing and poor tissue penetration of the drug.

SCOPE

A literature review was conducted to investigate the pharmacokinetics and pulmonary and tissue penetration of vancomycin and linezolid. Using MEDLINE and EMBASE, the most relevant articles in English published over the past 25 years (up to October 2008) were identified and summarized. Studies in human volunteers and adult patients that measured concentrations of antibiotic in serum, epithelial lining fluid (ELF), and tissue were selected for further review.

FINDINGS

For both drugs, pharmacokinetic studies were conducted in diverse patient populations and employed varying techniques to measure tissue concentrations. Vancomycin concentrations in ELF ranged from 5 to 25% of simultaneous plasma levels, while concentrations in whole homogenized lung tissue were slightly higher (24-41%). Distribution of vancomycin into soft tissue was variable. For linezolid, overall mean concentrations in ELF and in soft tissue were generally similar or higher than simultaneous plasma levels, although variability in tissue penetration across studies in healthy volunteers and patients was seen.

LIMITATIONS

The studies included in this review vary greatly in their designs and patient populations; this, together with methodologic difficulties, limits the interpretation of the data.

CONCLUSIONS

In the absence of clinical data correlating ELF concentrations and clinical outcome, the clinical significance of differences in pulmonary penetration of vancomycin and linezolid is unknown. Higher vancomycin serum concentrations may be necessary to achieve appropriate lung concentrations to optimize treatment outcomes. Linezolid demonstrates adequate penetration into lung and other soft issues with sustained concentrations above the minimum inhibitory concentrations for susceptible pathogens, including MRSA, for the majority of the dosing interval. Examination of the pharmacokinetic data adds insights not provided by the clinical trial data and together provides clinicians with a more comprehensive basis for selecting appropriate antimicrobial therapy for the treatment of serious MRSA infections.

Urinary bactericidal activity of single doses (250, 500, 750 and 1000 mg) of levofloxacin against fluoroquinolone-resistant strains of Escherichia coli

Increasing resistance to fluoroquinolones in uropathogens has become a clinical concern. The purpose of this study was to analyse the urinary bactericidal activity (UBA) of levofloxacin against fluoroquinolone-resistant strains of Escherichia coli. Ten healthy adult subjects (aged 23-60 years) received single doses of levofloxacin (250, 500, 750 and 1000 mg) and then blood and urine samples were collected in intervals (0-1.5, 1.5-4, 4-8, 8-12 and 12-24h) over 24h. Both serum and urine concentrations were measured by a validated high-performance liquid chromatography assay. Bactericidal titres in urine were determined against E. coli isolates with minimum inhibitory concentrations of 0.125, 4, 8, 16, 32 and 64microg/mL for levofloxacin. The mean serum pharmacokinetic parameters for these doses of levofloxacin were similar to previously published values. The mean peak urinary concentrations (0-1.5h) were 210, 347, 620 and 536microg/mL for the 250, 500, 750 and 1000 mg dose, respectively. Each dose of levofloxacin exhibited early (0-1.5h time period) bactericidal activity in urine in virtually all subjects against E. coli strains with MICs<or=32microg/mL. Moreover, high-dose (750 mg and 1000 mg) levofloxacin provided prolonged (8-12h time period) bactericidal activity in 9/10 subjects against E. coli isolates with MICs up to 32microg/mL. In summary, this ex vivo investigation found that high-dose levofloxacin can produce early and prolonged UBA against fluoroquinolone-resistant strains of E. coli. Patient outcome studies are needed to determine whether these findings translate into clinical cures.

Serum bactericidal activities of moxifloxacin and levofloxacin against aerobic and anaerobic intra-abdominal pathogens

We studied the serum bactericidal activity (SBA) of moxifloxacin and levofloxacin against common pathogens associated with complicated intra-abdominal infections. Ten healthy volunteers received a single dose of moxifloxacin (400 mg) and levofloxacin (750 mg) and serum samples were collected at 2, 4, 8, 12, and 24h after the dose of each drug. Bactericidal titers in serum over time were determined for aerobic gram-negative bacilli (Escherichia coli, Klebseilla pneumoniae, and Enterobacter cloacae) and anaerobic bacteria (Bacteroides fragilis, Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron, Prevotella bivia, and Finegoldia magna). Both fluoroquinolones provided rapid (2h) attainment and prolonged (24h) SBA (titers > or = 1:8) against each of the aerobic bacilli studied. SBA was observed for at least 12h against B. fragilis strains with MICs < or = 2 microg/ml to moxifloxacin and < or = 4 microg/ml to levofloxacin. Prolonged (12h) SBA (titers > or = 1:2) was also observed against isolates of B. thetaiotaomicron, P. bivia, and F. magna with moxifloxacin < or = MICs 2 microg/ml.

New drugs to treat skin and soft tissue infections

Due to increasing antimicrobial resistance, a pressing need exists for new antibiotics to treat skin and soft tissue infections. Several newer agents such as tigecycline, daptomycin, and linezolid have been important additions for the treatment of multidrug-resistant pathogens. New drugs in development such as dalbavancin and ceftobiprole will further enhance our ability to treat mixed infections and improve patient compliance. These promising new antimicrobials will likely grow in importance as resistant bacterial strains increase in community-acquired infections.

Linezolid tissue penetration and serum activity against strains of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus with reduced vancomycin susceptibility in diabetic patients with foot infections

OBJECTIVES

Linezolid soft tissue penetration and serum antimicrobial activity were analysed in six patients with peripheral vascular disease and severe diabetic foot infections requiring surgical intervention.

METHODS

Blood draws (1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 h after initiation of a 1 h infusion) and a viable soft tissue sample at the site of infection were obtained in patients receiving linezolid (600 mg every 12 h) on the day of surgery. Concentrations of linezolid were determined by HPLC in both tissue (pre-treated with tissue lysis buffer) and serum. In addition, serum inhibitory and bactericidal activity (dilution titres 1:2-1:32) of linezolid was determined in these patients against strains of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) with reduced susceptibility to vancomycin (vancomycin MICs = 2, 4, 8, 256 and >256 mg/L).

RESULTS

Linezolid concentrations in tissue were found to be 51% (range, 18% to 78%) of simultaneous serum concentrations. Rapid (1 h) and prolonged (12 h) inhibitory activity (titres > or = 1:2) was observed for linezolid against each of the study isolates. Furthermore, bactericidal activity (titres > or = 1:2) was observed for at least 6 h (50% of the dosing interval) against four of these five strains.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest that linezolid could be effective in the treatment of multidrug-resistant MRSA even when concentrations at the infection site are diminished due to impaired blood flow.

Symmetry breaking of in-plane order in confined copolymer mesophases

Packing of spherical-domain block copolymer mesophases confined to a thin film is investigated as a function of the number of layers n. We find an abrupt transition from hexagonal to orthorhombic in-plane ordering of domains when n is increased from 4 to 5. As n increases further (up to 23 in this study), the symmetry of the orthorhombic phase asymptotically approaches that of the body-centered cubic (110) plane. These results are interpreted in terms of the energetics of competing packings in the bulk and at the film interfaces. Detailed structural and thermodynamic properties are obtained with self-consistent field theory.

Single-crystal diffraction from two-dimensional block copolymer arrays

The structure of oriented 2D block copolymer single crystals is characterized by grazing-incidence small-angle x-ray diffraction, demonstrating long-range sixfold orientational order. From line shape analysis of the higher-order Bragg diffraction peaks, we determine that translational order decays algebraically with a decay exponent eta=0.2, consistent with the Kosterlitz-Thouless-Halperin-Nelson-Young theory for a 2D crystal with a shear modulus mu=2 x 10(-4) N/m.

Human serum activity of telithromycin, azithromycin and amoxicillin/clavulanate against common aerobic and anaerobic respiratory pathogens

Telithromycin is a new ketolide antimicrobial with a good in vitro activity against both aerobic and anaerobic respiratory pathogens. In this study, we evaluated the antibacterial activity over time of telithromycin (800mg), azithromycin (500mg), and amoxicillin/clavulanate (875/125mg) in serum following single oral doses of these agents to 10 healthy subjects. Inhibitory and bactericidal titers were determined at 2, 6, 12, and 24h after each dose and the median titer was used to determine antibacterial activity. Against two azithromycin-resistant strains of Streptococcus pneumoniae, both telithromycin (MIC=0.25 and 0.5 microg/mL) and amoxicillin/clavulanate exhibited inhibitory and cidal activity for at least 6h. All three antibiotics provided prolonged (>or=12h) inhibitory activity against strains of Hemophilus influenzae (telithromycin MIC=4.0 microg/ml). Both telithromycin and amoxicillin/clavulanate exhibited rapid and prolonged inhibitory activity (>or=12h) against each of the anaerobes studied (Finegoldia [Peptostreptococcus] magna Peptostreptococcus micros, Prevotella bivia, and Prevotella melaninogenica). Moreover, both agents provided bactericidal activity against both Prevotella species. In this ex vivo pharmacodynamic study, we found that telithromycin provided rapid and prolonged antibacterial activity in serum against macrolide-resistant strains of S. pneumoniae, beta-lactamase-positive and -negative strains of H. influenzae, and common respiratory anaerobic pathogens. These findings suggest that telithromycin could have clinical utility in the treatment of community-acquired mixed aerobic-anaerobic respiratory tract infections, including chronic sinusitis and aspiration pneumonia.

Tigecycline: A Critical Analysis

Tigecycline (GAR-936) is the first glycylcycline antibiotic to be approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The drug overcomes the 2 major resistance mechansisms of tetracycline: drug-specific efflux pump acquisition and ribosomal protection. Tigecycline is active against many gram-positive and -negative organisms, including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, vancomycin-intermediate and -resistant enterococci, and extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae. It is also active against many anaerobic bacteria, as well as atypical pathogens, including rapidly growing, nontuberculous mycobacteria. Tigecycline is concentrated in cells and is eliminated primarily via biliary excretion. Diminished renal function does not significantly alter its systemic clearance. Furthermore, tigecycline does not interfere with common cytochrome P450 enzymes, making pharmacokinetic drug interactions uncommon. It provides parenteral therapy for complicated skin/skin-structure and intra-abdominal infections. The only prominent adverse effects are associated with tolerability, most notably nausea and vomiting. Tigecycline will be most useful as empirical therapy for polymicrobial infections, especially in cases in which deep tissue penetration is needed or in which multidrug-resistant pathogens are suspected.

Fluoroquinolones and Anaerobes

The usefulness of fluoroquinolones for the treatment of mixed aerobic and anaerobic infections has been investigated since these agents started being used in clinical practice. Newer compounds have increased in vitro activity against anaerobes, but clinically relevant susceptibility breakpoints for these bacteria have not been established. Pharmacodynamic analyses and corroboration by new data from clinical trials have enhanced our knowledge concerning the use of fluoroquinolones to treat selective anaerobic pathogens. These studies suggest that newer agents could be useful in the treatment of several types of mixed aerobic and anaerobic infections, including skin and soft-tissue, intra-abdominal, and respiratory infections. The major concerns with expanding the use of fluoroquinolones to treat anaerobic infections have been reports of increasing resistance in Bacteroides group isolates and the impact of these antibiotics on the incidence of Clostridium difficile-associated disease.

Antimicrobial Resistance in the Hospital Setting: Impact, Trends, and Infection Control Measures

The growing threat posed by antibiotic-resistant pathogens is a major challenge for infectious disease practitioners and public health officials. In recent years, the prevalence of resistance among key bacterial pathogens, including Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Streptococcus pneumoniae, and Enterococcus sp, has increased at an alarming rate. The impact of antimicrobial resistance is manifold and can ultimately lead to treatment failure and increased morbidity and mortality. To control the spread of resistance and subsequent impact, a multifaceted approach is warranted. Awareness and surveillance of antimicrobial resistance, prudent use of antibiotics, and compliance with infection control techniques may help contain the emergence and spread of resistant organisms.

Safety of Newer Parenteral Antibiotics

Several parenteral antimicrobials have been introduced into clinical practice over the course of the last decade. Some of these agents (e.g., linezolid, daptomycin, and tigecycline) are prototypes of new classes of compounds. In comparative clinical trials, these newer anti-infectives have been shown to be safe and to have low rates of discontinuation by patients. However, long-term use has revealed unique toxicities associated with the use of some of these drugs. The adverse events and potential drug interactions associated with the use of these antibiotics are variable and require familiarity with the safety profile of each drug. It is especially important that clinicians be able to recognize serious adverse events associated with the use of specific drugs, because most of the adverse events can be readily reversed by cessation of therapy.

Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Linezolid in Obese Patients with Cellulitis

BACKGROUND:

Linezolid is an oxazolidinone antimicrobial with excellent oral bioavailability and tissue penetration and is active against multidrug-resistant skin/soft tissue pathogens.

OBJECTIVE:

To study the pharmacokinetics and antibacterial activity of linezolid against selective skin/soft tissue pathogens in obese patients.

METHODS:

We obtained multiple serum samples from 7 obese patients (>50% over their calculated ideal body weight) receiving oral linezolid 600 mg every 12 hours for treatment of cellulitis. Following a minimum of 3 doses, serum concentrations of linezolid were measured in each subject prior to (trough) and 1 and 6 hours after a dose. These samples were then tested against clinical isolates of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) (linezolid minimum inhibitory concentrations [MICs] 1.0, 2.0, 4.0 μg/mL) and one strain each of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium (VRE) (MIC 2.0 μg/mL), Bacteroides fragilis (MIC 2.0 μg/mL), and Peptostreptococcus magnus (MIC 1.0 μg/mL). Serum inhibitory titers (SITs) and bactericidal titers (SBTs) were measured at each time point, and the median activity for these 7 patients was calculated.

RESULTS:

Mean linezolid serum concentrations were 4.2, 12.3, and 7.2 μg/mL at these respective time points. Median SITs for 12 hours (100% of the dosing interval) were observed against each organism with the exception of the least susceptible strain of MRSA (MIC 4.0 μg/mL); serum inhibitory activity was observed only at the one-hour time point against this isolate. Furthermore, prolonged (⩾6 h) median SBTs were observed against one isolate of MRSA (MIC 1.0 μg/mL) as well as the strain of VRE and P. magnus.

CONCLUSIONS:

Serum concentrations of oral linezolid in this patient population were diminished compared with those of healthy volunteers, but still provided prolonged serum inhibitory activity against common pathogens associated with skin/soft tissue infections. One treatment concern would be an obese patient receiving oral linezolid who was infected with a less susceptible (MIC ⩾4.0 μg/mL) strain of S. aureus. Bactericidal activity was also observed against selective pathogens.

Urinary concentrations and bactericidal activities of newer fluoroquinolones in healthy volunteers

Eleven healthy male subjects participated in a crossover study to compare the urine concentrations and bactericidal activities of newer fluoroquinolones against common uropathogens. Each volunteer received a single oral dose of gatifloxacin (400 mg), levofloxacin (250 mg), moxifloxacin (400 mg) and trovafloxacin (200 mg), and a urine sample was obtained at 2, 6, 12 and 24 h after the dose. Urine concentrations were highest with gatifloxacin and levofloxacin and lowest with trovafloxacin. Each drug concentration was studied against a levofloxacin susceptible and moderately-susceptible strain of Escherichia coli (minimal inhibitory concentration, MICs: 0.125 and 4 mg/l), K. pneumoniae (MICs: 0.125 and 4 mg/l), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (MICs: 0.5 and 4 mg/l) and Enterococcus faecalis (MICs: 0.25 and 4 mg/l). The duration of urine bactericidal activity (UBA) was based upon the median bactericidal titre at each time period. Both gatifloxacin and levofloxacin exhibited prolonged (> or = 6 h) UBA against all of the study isolates. Moxifloxacin exhibited prolonged UBA against both isolates of E. coli, K. pneumoniae and E. faecalis but not against either strain of P. aeruginosa. Prolonged UBA was not observed for trovafloxacin against the moderately-susceptible strains with the exception of E. faecalis. Furthermore, UBA was not observed for trovafloxacin against the susceptible strain of P. aeruginosa. Although these newer fluoroquinolones exhibited similar in vitro activity against these uropathogens, only those compounds with the highest urinary concentrations (gatifloxacin and levofloxacin) produced prolonged UBA against both strains of P. aeruginosa. The findings from this study suggest that both microbiological activity and urinary concentrations are important parameters to consider when choosing a fluoroquinolone for empirical treatment of urinary tract infections (UTIs).

Serum Bactericidal Activity of the Methoxyfluoroquinolones Gatifloxacin and Moxifloxacin against Clinical Isolates of Staphylococcus Species: Are the Susceptibility Breakpoints Too High?

Healthy volunteers received a single dose of gatifloxacin and moxifloxacin (400 mg each), and serum samples were obtained from these volunteers over a 24-h period. Prolonged (> or =12 h) serum bactericidal activity (SBA) was observed for both agents against staphylococcal isolates with minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of gatifloxacin of < or =0.5 mug/mL. In strains with gatifloxacin MICs of 1.0 mug/mL, SBA was observed for < or =6 h, and, for isolates with gatifloxacin MICs of 2.0 mug/mL, little or no SBA was observed for either drug. The relative lack of SBA against less susceptible strains of staphylococci suggests that the current susceptibility breakpoint concentration (MIC, 2.0 mug/mL) for these methoxyfluoroquinolones against Staphylococcus is too high.

Bactericidal activities of methoxyfluoroquinolones gatifloxacin and moxifloxacin against aerobic and anaerobic respiratory pathogens in serum

Gatifloxacin (Bristol-Myers Squibb) and moxifloxacin (Bayer) are new methoxyfluoroquinolones with broad-spectrum activity against aerobic and anaerobic pathogens of the respiratory tract. In this investigation, we analyzed the bactericidal activity in serum over time of these antimicrobials against three aerobic (Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae, and Staphylococcus aureus) and four anaerobic (Peptostreptococcus micros, Peptostreptococcus magnus, Fusobacterium nucleatum, and Prevotella melaninogenica) bacteria associated with respiratory tract infections. Serum samples were obtained from 11 healthy male subjects following a single 400-mg oral dose of gatifloxacin and moxifloxacin. These samples were collected prior to and at 2, 6, 12, and 24 h after the dose of each drug. Gatifloxacin exhibited bactericidal activity for a median of 12 h against Streptococcus pneumoniae (MIC = 0.5 micro g/ml), Peptostreptococcus micros (MIC = 0.25 micro g/ml), and F. nucleatum (MIC = 0.5 micro g/ml) and 24 h against H. influenzae (MIC = 0.03 micro g/ml), Staphylococcus aureus (MIC = 0.125 micro g/ml), Peptostreptococcus magnus (MIC = 0.125 micro g/ml), and Prevotella melaninogenica (MIC = 0.5 micro g/ml). Moxifloxacin exhibited bactericidal activity for a median of 24 h against Streptococcus pneumoniae (MIC = 0.125 micro g/ml), H. influenzae (MIC = 0.015 micro g/ml), Staphylococcus aureus (MIC = 0.06 micro g/ml), F. nucleatum (MIC = 0.5 micro g/ml), Prevotella melaninogenica (MIC =0.5 micro g/ml), Peptostreptococcus magnus (MIC = 0.125 micro g/ml), and Peptostreptococcus micros (MIC = 0.25 micro g/ml). The results from this pharmacodynamic study suggest that these fluoroquinolones would have prolonged killing activity against these organisms in vivo and may have clinical utility in the treatment of mixed aerobic-anaerobic respiratory tract infections.

Review of the in vitro activity and potential clinical efficacy of levofloxacin in the treatment of anaerobic infections

The activity of levofloxacin against aerobic bacteria has been well documented both in vitro and clinically, but its anaerobic activity has been infrequently studied. This new fluoroquinolone exhibits good in vitro activity (MIC(S) < or =2.0 microg/mL) against many anaerobic pathogens associated with acute sinusitis, bite wounds, and other soft-tissue infections. It is less active against Bacteroides fragilis (MIC (90)=2-4 microg/mL ) and has poor inhibitory activity against non-fragilis B. fragilis group species that are associated with gastrointestinal and genitourinary tract infections. Levofloxacin does not antagonize the in vitro activity of clindamycin and metronidazole and often provides additive or synergistic activity against anaerobic bacteria with these agents. In pharmacodynamic models, levofloxacin exhibits rapid bactericidal activity at 2-4 times the MIC of anaerobic bacteria. Prolonged killing is observed when the area-under-the concentration-time-curve to MIC ratio is greater than 40. In clinical efficacy trials, levofloxacin has been effective in the treatment of patients with gynecologic, skin and skin-structure, and bone infections involving anaerobic pathogens. Both micro-biologic and pharmacodynamic studies support further evaluations of levofloxacin in the treatment of selective mixed aerobic/anaerobic infections.

Serum bactericidal activity of extended-release clarithromycin against macrolide-resistant strains of Streptococcus pneumoniae

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To investigate the serum bactericidal activity (SBA) over time of extended-release clarithromycin against moderately resistant strains of Streptococcus pneumoniae.

DESIGN

Prospective, single-dose pharmacodynamic study.

SETTING

University-affiliated research center.

SUBJECTS

Eleven healthy male volunteers.

INTERVENTION

All volunteers received a single dose of extended-release clarithromycin as two 500-mg tablets, and blood samples were obtained at 0, 2, 6, 12, and 24 hours after administration of the dose.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

For each blood sample, a serum bactericidal titer (SBT) was determined against S. pneumoniae strains with minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of 0.5, 1.0, 2.0, 4.0, and 8.0 microg/ml to clarithromycin. The median SBT was determined for each time period. The extended-release formulation of clarithromycin exhibited SBA for 24 hours against pneumococcal strains with MICs of 0.5, 1.0, and 2.0 microg/ml. No SBA was observed against isolates with MICs of 4.0 or 8.0 microg/ml.

CONCLUSION

The extended-release formulation of clarithromycin, taken once/day, will provide SBA for 24 hours against strains of S. pneumoniae with MICs of 2.0 microg/ml or less.

Viral load as a surrogate end point in HIV disease

OBJECTIVE

To examine the role of viral load as a surrogate end point for HIV disease progression and death.

DATA SOURCES

A MEDLINE search was conducted for the years 1990-March 2001. In addition, relevant articles were cross-referenced to screen for additional information.

STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION

Data regarding the validity of viral load as a surrogate end point for disease progression or death are cited. Emphasis was placed on randomized, controlled trials, but descriptive studies are also included.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Recently, viral load has emerged as an important biomarker for monitoring HIV disease and antiretroviral therapy. Both baseline viral load and changes in viral load with time predict HIV disease progression and death. In fact, disease progression increases consistently once viral load exceeds 10,000 copies/mL, and AIDS and death primarily occur in patients with viral loads > 100,000 copies/mL. Changes that occur in viral load after initiation of antiretroviral therapy, however, do not fully explain the entire treatment effect. Also, separate comparisons of antiretroviral regimens may demonstrate similar differences in viral load changes but not similar differences in disease progression.

CONCLUSIONS

Viral load is an important monitoring parameter for HIV disease and antiretroviral therapy. However, changes in viral load do not explain the entire clinical improvement that occurs after initiation of therapy. Although viral load is a clinically important surrogate end point for HIV disease, it cannot fully account for all associated treatment effects.

Standardization of broth microdilution and disk diffusion susceptibility tests for Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae and Haemophilus somnus: quality control standards for ceftiofur, enrofloxacin, florfenicol, gentamicin, penicillin, tetracycline, tilmicosin, and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole

Quality control (QC) standards for the in vitro antimicrobial susceptibility testing of two fastidious veterinary pathogens, Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae and Haemophilus somnus, were developed in a multilaboratory study according to procedures established by the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards for broth microdilution and disk diffusion testing. The medium recommended for the broth microdilution testing is cation-adjusted Mueller-Hinton broth supplemented with 2% lysed horse blood, 2% yeast extract, and 2% supplement C. This medium has been designated veterinary fastidious medium. The medium recommended for the disk diffusion testing is chocolate Mueller-Hinton agar. The recommended QC organisms are A. pleuropneumoniae ATCC 27090 and H. somnus ATCC 700025. The QC MICs of ceftiofur, enrofloxacin, florfenicol, gentamicin, penicillin, tetracycline, tilmicosin, and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole were determined for each isolate, as were the zone size ranges. Of the results from the participating laboratories, 94.0% of the zone diameter results and 97.0% of the MIC results fell within the suggested QC ranges for all compounds. These QC guidelines should allow greater accuracy in interpreting results when testing these antimicrobial agents against fastidious pathogens.

Comparative serum bactericidal activity of clarithromycin and azithromycin against macrolide-sensitive and resistant strains of Streptococcus pneumoniae

The serum pharmacodynamics of clarithromycin and azithromycin were studied against isolates of S. pneumoniae, including efflux resistant (M. phenotype) strains, by analyzing their serum bactericidal activity (SBA) over time. Normal healthy subjects were given a single 500 mg oral dose of these macrolides and serum samples were collected over 12 hrs. Paired isolates with MICs ranging from 0.25 ug/ml to 8.0 ug/ml were analyzed. Prolonged (at least 6 hrs) SBA was observed with clarithromycin for strains with MICs < or = 2.0 ug/ml. No SBA was observed in strains with MICs >or = 4.0 ug/ml. Azithromycin exhibited SBA for at least 6 hrs for strains up to a MIC = 0.5 ug/ml. No SBA was observed for isolates with MICs > or = 1.0 ug/ml. In contrast to azithromycin, clarithromycin exhibited SBA for at least one-half of its normal dosing interval against S. pneumoniae strains well above its current susceptibility breakpoint concentration of 0.25 microg/ml. These findings may have relevance to the ongoing debate as to the appropriate susceptibility breakpoints for the newer macrolides.

Cost-effectiveness of sparfloxacin compared with other oral antimicrobials in outpatient treatment of community-acquired pneumonia

We examined the cost-effectiveness of sparfloxacin compared with other selected oral antimicrobials in outpatient treatment of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) using clinical pathway-based decision analysis. Cost estimates were obtained from medical claims databases and Medicare reimbursement schedules. Probability estimates were derived from published clinical trials, the medical literature, and clinical expert opinion. Overall adjusted efficacy rates were 89% for sparfloxacin, 79.4% for azithromycin, 77.8% for clarithromycin, 73% for cefaclor, 70.8% for amoxicillin-clavulanic acid, and 69% for erythromycin. The expected total cost/CAP episode of treatment with sparfloxacin was $216.07 compared with $258.97, $297.08, $345.75, $389.80, and $395.93 for azithromycin, clarithromycin, erythromycin, amoxicillin-clavulanic acid, and cefaclor, respectively. Therapy with sparfloxacin for managing CAP is cost effective-relative to other commonly prescribed antibiotics, resulting in net cost savings.

Comparison of single-dose fosfomycin and a 7-day course of nitrofurantoin in female patients with uncomplicated urinary tract infection

This multicenter clinical trial compared single-dose fosfomycin tromethamine with a 7-day course of nitrofurantoin for the treatment of acute uncomplicated lower urinary tract infection (UTI) in female patients. Healthy females with symptoms of acute uncomplicated UTI were enrolled in a double-masked, randomized clinical trial. Assessable patients had >10(5) colony-forming units per milliliter of a uropathogen in a clean-voided midstream urine sample. Patients received a single 3-g dose of fosfomycin tromethamine plus 7 days of placebo capsules or a single 3-g dose of placebo plus 7 days of nitrofurantoin monohydrate/macrocrystal 100-mg capsules. Treatment efficacy was assessed by both bacteriologic and clinical response 5 to 11 days after the initial treatment dose (visit 2) and 5 to 11 days (visit 3) and 4 to 6 weeks (visit 4) after the last day of medication. Of the 749 patients initially enrolled in the study, 375 received fosfomycin and 374 received nitrofurantoin. There were no clinical differences in patient characteristics between the 2 groups at study entry. Overall, 94% of pretreatment isolates were susceptible to fosfomycin and 83% were susceptible to nitrofurantoin. Bacteriologic cure rates at the first follow-up visit (5 to 11 days after initiation of treatment) were 78% and 86% for fosfomycin and nitrofurantoin, respectively (P = 0.02). At visit 3 (1 week posttreatment), they were 87% and 81% for fosfomycin and nitrofurantoin, respectively (P = 0.17). Both treatment groups had an 80% overall clinical success rate (cure and improvement). Twenty patients (5.3%) who received fosfomycin and 21 patients (5.6%) who received nitrofurantoin reported an adverse effect related to study medication. The most common side effects related to fosfomycin treatment were diarrhea (2.4%), vaginitis (1.8%), and nausea (0.8%). Both bacteriologic and clinical cure rates observed with a single 3-g dose of fosfomycin were comparable to those achieved with a 7-day course of nitrofurantoin in female patients with acute uncomplicated UTI.

Fosfomycin tromethamine: single-dose treatment of acute cystitis

Fosfomycin tromethamine is an oral antimicrobial indicated for the treatment of uncomplicated lower urinary tract infections (UTIs). This agent is active in the urine against common uropathogens that are associated with cystitis in women, including organisms resistant to other antibiotics. A single dose of fosfomycin tromethamine is well absorbed and produces a therapeutic concentration in the urine for one to three days. Comparative clinical trials suggest that a single 3.0-g dose of fosfomycin tromethamine is as clinically effective as 7- to 10-day treatment regimens of standard agents such as nitrofurantoin, norfloxacin, and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole used to treat UTIs. Fosfomycin tromethamine is well tolerated and appears safe for use during pregnancy. Quality-of-life advantages, such as enhanced compliance and convenience, are also important aspects of fosfomycin tromethamine therapy.

Newer oral antimicrobials for resistant respiratory tract pathogens. Which show the most promise?

As antimicrobial resistance to tried-and-true drugs continues to build, an arsenal of new drugs aimed at resistant respiratory tract pathogens is needed. Penicillin is now ineffective against several common pathogens, including many pneumococcal organisms. Newer antimicrobials, including macrolides, cephalosporins, and fluoroquinolones, have been developed to take its place. The authors of this article present a progress report of the fight against respiratory tract infection and an assessment of the most promising newer agents for use against multidrug-resistant pathogens.

Urinary pharmacodynamics of low-dose ciprofloxacin and ofloxacin

The incidence of resistant uropathogens to the fluoroquinolones is increasing, but their effectiveness in the urine against these strains is unknown. In this investigation, we studied the urinary pharmacodynamics of ciprofloxacin (100 mg) and ofloxacin (200 mg) against urinary isolates that were moderately resistant to ciprofloxacin (Escherichia coli, MIC = 4; Klebsiella pneumoniae, MIC = 4. Staphylococcus saprophyticus, MIC = 8) and ofloxacin. Seven healthy female volunteers received three doses (one dose every 12 h) of ciprofloxacin and ofloxacin in a randomized, crossover design with a 1-week washout period between regimens. Urine bactericidal activity was determined after the first and third dose of each drug. Both ciprofloxacin and ofloxacin exhibited prolonged (> or = 6 h) urine bactericidal activity against the E. coli and K. pneumoniae isolates after the first dose. No bactericidal activity was demonstrated for ciprofloxacin against the S. saprophyticus strain. In contrast, ofloxacin exhibited urine bactericidal activity for 8 h against this isolate. Similar findings were observed after the third dose, with the exception that ciprofloxacin exhibited a short period (4 h) of bactericidal activity against the S. saprophyticus strain. In summary, low-dose regimens of ciprofloxacin and ofloxacin exhibited prolonged bactericidal activity against moderately resistant strains of common bacterial uropathogens. Only ofloxacin demonstrated bactericidal activity in the urine during the first dosing interval against a moderately resistant isolate of S. saprophyticus.

Single-dose treatment of acute cystitis with fosfomycin tromethamine

OBJECTIVE

To review the clinical pharmacology of fosfomycin tromethamine, a new antimicrobial agent for the treatment of uncomplicated lower urinary tract infections (UTIs).

DATA SOURCE

Publications in English on fosfomycin, fosfomycin tromethamine, and fosfomycin trometamol (MEDLINE, 1970-1997), as well as unpublished studies submitted to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), were reviewed.

STUDY SELECTION

Comparative, randomized, controlled studies were used to analyze the efficacy and safety of fosfomycin tromethamine.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Fosfomycin tromethamine is an oral antimicrobial indicated for the treatment of uncomplicated lower UTIs. This agent is active in the urine against common uropathogens that are associated with cystitis in women, including organisms resistant to other antibiotics. A single dose of fosfomycin tromethamine is well absorbed and produces therapeutic concentrations in the urine for 2-4 days. Comparative clinical trials suggest that a single dose of fosfomycin tromethamine 3.0 g is as clinically effective as 7- to 10-day treatment regimens of standard agents used to treat UTIs, such as nitrofurantoin, norfloxacin, and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole. Fosfomycin tromethamine is well tolerated and appears safe to use during pregnancy.

CONCLUSIONS

Fosfomycin tromethamine is the only antimicrobial to be approved by the FDA for single-dose therapy in women with acute cystitis. It is as effective and safe as multidose comparators and appears safe to use during pregnancy. The acquisition cost of this new drug will need to be weighed against the improved compliance and convenience associated with its use in the treatment of uncomplicated UTIs.

Sparfloxacin: potential clinical and economic impact in the treatment of respiratory infections

Sparfloxacin is a new oral fluoroquinolone antimicrobial that is highly active against common respiratory pathogens, including multiresistant strains. It is well absorbed and has excellent penetration into upper and lower respiratory tissues. Sparfloxacin is administered once a day and does not interfere with the metabolism of other drugs. The agent is highly effective and safe in the treatment of acute sinusitis, exacerbations of chronic bronchitis, and community-acquired pneumonia. Due to its activity against multidrug-resistant respiratory pathogens, it has the potential to prevent hospitalization as well as decrease parenteral antibiotic therapy. Consequently, it may generate significant pharmacoeconomic benefits to patients and payers of medical care.