The I4RON-HF study, Intravenous Iron Isomaltoside for Inpatients veRsus Outpatient Asians with Heart Failure

Background and purpose

Iron deficiency (ID) impacts ∼50% of heart failure (HF) patients [1] and is a risk factor and strong predictor for death and mortality with or without anaemia [2]. Oral iron appears to be ineffective whilst intravenous iron (IV-iron) has proven to be efficacious however data is primarily from a Caucasian population [3] despite ID being more prevalent amongst Asians. The I4RON-HF study assesses efficacy of high-dose IV-iron versus oral iron in stable outpatients and inpatients amongst an Asian population recovering from episodes of decompensated HF.

Methods

This is a single-centre randomized controlled study, where patients who had symptomatic heart failure (Ejection Fraction <50% and New York Heart Association class 2–3) were randomized into two groups. The intervention arm received anywhere from 500mg to 1500mg of IV Iron Isomaltoside as a single infusion, whereas the control arm received routine iron supplements.

The primary study endpoint was the percentage of patients achieving iron repletion at 4,8 and 12 months after enrolment. Secondary endpoints included clinical parameters (6-minute walk test, NYHA status and 2D-Echocardiogram), and biochemical parameters (Serum NTproBNP, Cardiac Troponin-T and hemogloblin) at 4,8 and 12 months.

Results

A total of 65 patients were enrolled (male 55%), 33 in the interventional arm and 32 in the control arm. There were no patients lost to follow up. 96.9% of patients in the IV Iron arm achieved the primary endpoint at 4 months, compared to 68.7% in the control group. These findings we consistent at 8 months (90.9% vs 65.6%) and 12 months (90.9% vs 56.2%). Looking at the secondary endpoints, the IV Iron cohort recorded a 11.14% increase in Hemogloblin levels versus the control arm which recorded a reduction of 16.23%. There was also lower NTproBNP levels in the IV iron group (81.6% reduction) versus the control group (66.3% reduction). Clinically, the patients who received IV iron had a 42.98% increase in their 6-minute walk test from baseline, compared to an increase of 8.61% in the control arm. There were no significant echocardiographic changes.

Conclusion

These findings in our single-centre study support the efficacy of IV iron over oral supplements in the treatment of iron deficiency amongst Asian heart failure patients. The secondary endpoints also indicate better clinical and biochemical outcomes when iron stores are successfully repleted. Lastly, this study demonstrates the feasibility and safety of outpatient administration of high-dose IV-iron. Results from large-scale clinical studies looking at hard endpoints (mortality, HF hospitalization) are expected to further advance understandings.

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding sources: Foundation. Main funding source(s): National Heart Institute (Institut Jantung Negara) FoundationCompai Pharma

Prevalence of olfactory and taste dysfunction in COVID-19 patients: a community care facility study

Purpose

We aim to study the prevalence of olfactory and taste dysfunction (OTD) in subjects residing in a Community Care Facility (CCF), a center unique to Singapore that is dedicated to isolate foreign workers with COVID-19 infection who have mild disease with minimal or no symptoms.

Methods

This is a cross-sectional study analyzing data prospectively collected from COVID-19-positive subjects who were admitted into a single-center Singapore EXPO CCF from 1st May 2020 to 1st July 2020. The following variables were collected: age, gender, ethnicity, anosmia, ageusia and acute respiratory infection (ARI) symptoms. Symptoms of anosmia and ageusia were self-declared via a mandatory questionnaire administered on admission.

Results

A total of 1983 subjects were included. The overall prevalence of anosmia and ageusia is 3.0% and 2.6%, respectively. 58% of anosmic subjects have co-existent ageusia and 72.6% of anosmic subjects have no concurrent sinonasal symptoms. OTD is less likely to present in subjects who are asymptomatic for ARI, compared to those symptomatic for ARI (anosmia: 2.0% versus 4.4% p = 0.002; ageusia: 1.6% versus 4.2% p < 0.001). There is a difference in the prevalence of OTD between the different ethnic groups (Indian, Chinese, Bangladeshi and Others), with Chinese and Bangladeshi reporting a higher prevalence (p < 0.043)

Conclusion

The true prevalence of OTD in COVID-19-positive subjects may be low with aggressive screening of all subjects, including those asymptomatic for ARI.

Development of an enhanced acute care surgery service in response to the COVID-19 global pandemic

BACKGROUND

As the COVID-19 pandemic sweeps across the world, healthcare departments must adapt to meet the challenges of service provision and staff/patient protection. Unlike elective surgery, acute care surgery (ACS) workloads cannot be artificially reduced providing a unique challenge for administrators to balance healthcare resources between the COVID-19 surge and regular patient admissions.

METHODS

An enhanced ACS (eACS) model of care is described with the aim of limiting COVID-19 healthcare worker and patient cross-infection as well as providing 24/7 management of emergency general surgical (GS) and trauma patients. The eACS service comprised 5 independent teams covering a rolling 1:5 24-hr call. Attempts to completely separate eACS teams and patients from the elective side were made. The service was compared to the existing ACS service in terms of clinical and efficiency outcomes. Finally, a survey of staff attitudes towards these changes, concerns regarding COVID-19 and psychological well-being was assessed.

RESULTS

There were no staff/patient COVID-19 cross-infections. Compared to the ACS service, eACS patients had reduced overall length of stay (2-days), time spent in the Emergency Room (46 min) and time from surgery to discharge (2.4-hours). The eACS model of care saved financial resources and bed-days for the organisation. The changes were well received by team-members who also felt that their safety was prioritised.

CONCLUSION

In healthcare systems not overwhelmed by COVID-19, an eACS model may assist in preserving psychological well-being for healthcare staff whilst providing 24/7 care for emergency GS and trauma patients.