Early and late implications of COVID-19 on male reproductive health: 3 years of data

INTRODUCTION

COVID-19 (coronavirus disease 2019), caused by SARS-CoV-2 (severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2), has significantly affected global health. Research has shown that the virus can be found at high concentrations in male gonadal tissue. Yet, the virus's long-term implications on male reproductive health remains relatively unclear.

OBJECTIVE

A comprehensive narrative review of published literature regarding COVID-19's short- and long-term implications on male reproductive health.

METHODS

A literature search of the PubMed and EMBASE databases was performed for articles ranging from November 2019 to August 2022. Studies that focused on the impact of COVID-19 on male reproductive health were selected for review. Studies were included if they were written in English and reported semen analyses, pathologic gonadal tissue analyses, serum androgen assays, or a combination of these in patients with COVID-19. Moreover, literature was included on COVID-19 vaccinations' impacts on male reproductive health. Case reports and other narrative reviews were excluded from this review.

RESULTS

SARS-CoV-2 has been detected in cadaveric testicular tissue during the initial stages of infection in fatal cases of the disease, demonstrating marked inflammatory changes and decreased spermatogenesis in patients with COVID-19. Several studies have revealed a negative impact on androgens during acute illness and in the ensuing months, but data on the recovery of androgen levels are confounding and limited in scope. COVID-19 does have significant negative impacts on bulk semen parameters, as confirmed in studies comparing pre- and post-COVID-19 semen samples. Vaccination is a valuable tool for protecting patients from the negative impacts of the virus and has been shown to have no negative impact on male reproductive potential.

CONCLUSION

Given the virus's impacts on testicular tissue, androgens, and spermatogenesis, COVID-19 can negatively affect male reproductive health for an extended period. Therefore, vaccinations should continue to be recommended to all eligible patients.

Peyronie's Disease: What About the Female Sexual Partner?

INTRODUCTION

Peyronie's disease (PD) is an acquired wound-healing disorder of the penis involving fibrosis and scar formation within the tunica albuginea that can lead to various penile deformities resulting in penile pain, sexual dysfunction, low self-esteem, and emotional distress. While many studies highlight the psychosocial impact of PD on the patient, little is known about the female partner's experience regarding PD and its management.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate and summarize the available clinical data on the effects of the disease and its management on female sexual partners of patients with PD.

METHODS

A search of the available medical literature using the MEDLINE and PubMed databases was performed. The queried terms included the following: Peyronie's disease, partner, female, dyspareunia, relationship, satisfaction, survey, and outcome. Studies were included only if the female sexual partners were directly evaluated or interviewed.

RESULTS

PD can have a significant impact on the sexual function and satisfaction of female sexual partners. Most female sexual partners reported an improvement in their relationship, a decrease in sexual dysfunction, and improved overall satisfaction after both surgical and nonsurgical treatment.

CONCLUSION

PD can be emotionally debilitating for patients and their partners. It has been associated with depression, social stigmatization, isolation, diminished self-worth, and avoidance of intimacy. A partner's experience with PD, as well as its management and outcomes, is an understudied entity that warrants further investigation and may be useful in guiding future treatment approaches. Kern T, Ye N, Abdelsayed GA. Peyronie's Disease: What About the Female Sexual Partner?. Sex Med Rev 2021;9:230-235.

A Comparison of Hemostatic Patches Versus Pericardium Allograft for the Treatment of Complex Peyronie's Disease With Penile Prosthesis and Plaque Incision

OBJECTIVE

To compare outcomes between hemostatic patches (HP) versus pericardium allografts (PA) for complex Peyronie's disease with erectile dysfunction managed with inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP) and plaque incision and grafting (PIG).

METHODS

We reviewed all men who underwent IPP with PIG for PD at our institution (4/2010-9/2018). PIG was performed via relaxing tunical incisions during IPP implantation following manual modeling if there was persistent curve >30^° and/or significant narrowing. Tunical defects >2 cm were grafted. PA (Coloplast, Minneapolis, MN) or HP consisting of either Evarrest, Nu-Knit (Ethicon Inc., Somerville, NJ), or TachoSil (Baxter Int., Deerfield, IL) were used.

RESULTS

HP was placed in 18 men (n = 10 Evarrest, n = 6 Nu-Knit, and n = 2 TachoSil), 15 had PA. There was no difference in mean age, preoperative curvature (HP:75° vs PA:78°), or grafted area (HP:11.9 cm² vs PA:10.9 cm²) between HP and PA cohorts. Mean operative time was shorter for HP (122 vs 166 minutes, P = .01). Median follow-up: 6.6 months (range: 2-27 months) for HP and 34.6 months (range: 13-103 months) for PA. Residual curvature >20° was present following HP in 16.7% (n = 3) and PA in 13.3% (n = 2; P = 1.0). There were no complications attributable to HP/PA material and no IPP herniation through the tunical defect. Postoperatively, 94.4% (n = 17) of HP and 93.3% (n = 14) of PA patients were engaged in penetrative intercourse (P = 1.0).

CONCLUSION

HP are effective materials to cover the tunical defect over an IPP following plaque incision for PD. HP outcomes are similar to PA, while operative time is shorter for HP.

Effect of a Smoking Cessation Program on Sexual Function Recovery Following Robotic Prostatectomy at Kaiser Permanente Southern California

INTRODUCTION

The association between cigarette smoking and erectile dysfunction has been well established. Studies demonstrate improvements in erectile rigidity and tumescence as a result of smoking cessation. Radical prostatectomy is also associated with worsening of erectile function secondary to damage to the neurovascular bundles. To our knowledge, no previous studies have examined the relationship between smoking cessation after prostate cancer diagnosis and its effect on sexual function following robotic prostatectomy. We sought to demonstrate the utility of a smoking cessation program among patients with prostate cancer who planned to undergo robotic prostatectomy at Kaiser Permanente Southern California.

METHODS

All patients who underwent robotic prostatectomy between March 2011 and April 2013 with known smoking status were included, and were followed-up through November 2014. All smokers were offered the smoking cessation program, which included wellness coaching, tobacco cessation classes, and pharmacotherapy. Patients completed the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite-26 (EPIC-26) health-related quality-of-life (HR-QOL) survey at baseline and postoperatively at 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months. There were 2 groups based on smoking status: Continued smoking vs quitting group. Patient's age, Charlson Comorbidity Score, body mass index, educational level, median household income, family history of prostate cancer, race/ethnicity, language, nerve-sparing status, and preoperative/postoperative clinicopathology and EPIC-26 HR-QOL scores were examined. A linear regression model was used to predict sexual function recovery.

RESULTS

A total of 139 patients identified as smokers underwent the smoking cessation program and completed the EPIC-26 surveys. Fifty-six patients quit smoking, whereas 83 remained smokers at last follow-up. All demographics and clinicopathology were matched between the 2 cohorts. Smoking cessation, along with bilateral nerve-sparing status, were the only 2 modifiable factors associated with improved sexual function after prostatectomy (6.57 points, p = 0.0226 and 8.97 points, p = 0.0485, respectively).

CONCLUSION

In the setting of robotic prostatectomy, perioperative smoking cessation is associated with a significant improvement in long-term sexual functional outcome when other factors are adjusted.

Healthcare utilization in men with poorer sexual and urinary function recovery following robot-assisted radical prostatectomy

PURPOSE

Robotic radical prostatectomy focuses on oncologic cure, urinary continence and sexual function recovery. However, little is known about the effect of declines in urinary continence and sexual function on healthcare utilization. We aim to identify these factors.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From March 2011 to September 2013, all men undergoing robotic prostatectomy within our healthcare system were enrolled. Men completed the expanded prostate cancer index composite-26 survey at the time of diagnosis and 90 days post-operatively. Patients were stratified according to change in scores in the sexual function and urinary incontinence domains. Patient, treatment and post-op utilization patterns were examined for association with the extent of decline in sexual function and urinary continence. Multivariate linear regression was used to identify factors independently associated with decline in continence and sexual function.

RESULTS

A total of 411 men who completed the baseline survey and at 90 days postoperatively were included. On multivariate linear regression, younger age (p < 0.01), higher preoperative sexual function (< 0.01), single marital status (p = 0.04) and more post-surgery email contacts (p = 0.04) were associated with higher declines in sexual function. For continence, no family history of prostate cancer (p = 0.01), higher baseline continence (p < 0.01) and more post-surgery physical therapy visits (p < 0.01) were associated with higher declines.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with the poorest quality of life outcomes at 90 days post-operatively were more likely to seek care via email and physical therapy encounters related to sexual function and urinary incontinence, respectively. This suggests that maximizing post-treatment quality of life can potentially reduce healthcare utilization.

Does the Level of Assistant Experience Impact Operative Outcomes for Robot-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy?

PURPOSE

A skilled assistant surgeon is presumed necessary during robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) to minimize warm ischemia time (WIT) and to facilitate complex renorrhaphy. Studies observing impact of resident participation have focused on robotic prostatectomies, showing no impact on core surgical outcomes. Herein, we evaluated the level of experience of the bedside assistant and its impact on perioperative outcomes in RAPN.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All RAPN cases in our healthcare system from January 2011 to December 2013 were retrospectively reviewed. The cases were divided into teaching and nonteaching hospitals. There were 18 fellowship-trained attending surgeons. At teaching hospitals, surgeries were performed by an attending physician and postgraduate year (PGY)-2 or PGY-3 resident at bedside; at nonteaching hospitals, surgeries were performed by two attending surgeons. We compared age, gender, body mass index, Charlson comorbidity index, operative difficulty by R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score, and operative outcomes (WIT, estimated blood loss, operative time (OT), positive margin rate, length of stay (LOS), postoperative glomerular filtration rate, and readmission rate).

RESULTS

Of the 170 patients captured, 162 had R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score and WIT: 112 from teaching hospitals and 50 from nonteaching hospitals. Patient characteristics were equivalent between both cohorts with the exception of the R.E.N.A.L. score, which was higher (6.3 vs 5.7, p = 0.046) in the teaching hospitals cohort. Regarding operative outcomes, we noted an overall increase in LOS by 1 day (p = 0.001) and OT by 16 minutes (p = 0.011) in the teaching hospitals.

CONCLUSION

We observed that increased LOS was the only clinically relevant measure negatively impacted by resident physician involvement during RAPN.