1
|
Coluccio C, Facciorusso A, Forti E, De Nucci G, Mitri RD, Togliani T, Cugia L, Ofosu A, Anderloni A, Tarantino I, Fabbri C, Crinò SF. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided drainage of pancreatic collections with dedicated metal stents: A nationwide, multicenter, propensity score-matched comparison. Dig Liver Dis 2024; 56:159-169. [PMID: 37517962 DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2023.07.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2023] [Revised: 07/08/2023] [Accepted: 07/11/2023] [Indexed: 08/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The new dedicated stents for endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided transluminal drainage of peri‑pancreatic fluid collections (PFCs) demonstrated optimal efficacy and safety profiles. AIMS This study aimed to evaluate the safety, technical and clinical success, and recurrence rate of PFCs drained with Lumen Apposing Metal Stent (LAMS) or Bi-Flanged Metal Stent (BFMS). METHODS Data from a multicenter series of PFCs treated with LAMS or BFMS at 30 Italian centers during a 5-year period were retrieved. The rate of adverse events (AEs), technical success, clinical success, PFC recurrence were evaluated. To overcome biases, a 1-to-1 match was created using propensity score analysis. RESULTS Out of 476 patients, 386 were treated with LAMS and 90 with BFMS, with a median follow-up of 290 days (95% CI 244 to 361). Using propensity score matching, 84 patients were assigned to each group. The incidence of AEs did not differ between the two stents (13.1% versus 15.5%, p = 0.29), mainly bleeding or recurrence rate (4.7% versus 3.5%, p = 1). Technical and clinical success in the BFMS and LAMS groups were 92% versus 95% (p = 0.36) and 91% versus 94% (p = 0.64), respectively. CONCLUSION Our study demonstrates that LAMS and BFMS have comparable safety profiles with similar technical and clinical success rates for EUS-guided PFC drainage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chiara Coluccio
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, Forlì-Cesena Hospitals, AUSL Romagna, Forlì, 47121, Italy.
| | - Antonio Facciorusso
- Section of Gastroenterology, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Foggia, Foggia, 71100, Italy
| | - Edoardo Forti
- Operative Endoscopy Unit, Niguarda Ca' Granda Hospital, Milano, 20100, Italy
| | - Germana De Nucci
- Department of Gastroenterology, Salvini Hospital, Garbagnate, 20024, Italy
| | - Roberto Di Mitri
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, Arnas Civico Hospital, Palermo, 90100, Italy
| | - Thomas Togliani
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, ASST Carlo Poma, Mantua, 46100, Italy
| | - Luigi Cugia
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Department, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Sassari, Sassari, 07100, Italy
| | - Andrew Ofosu
- Division of Digestive Diseases, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, 45219, USA
| | - Andrea Anderloni
- Endoscopy Unit, First Department of Internal Medicine, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, University of Pavia, Pavia, 27100, Italy
| | - Ilaria Tarantino
- Endoscopy Service, Department of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Services, ISMETT, Palermo, 90100, Italy
| | - Carlo Fabbri
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, Forlì-Cesena Hospitals, AUSL Romagna, Forlì, 47121, Italy
| | - Stefano Francesco Crinò
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, The Pancreas Institute, University Hospital of Verona, Verona, 37100, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Crinò SF, Napoleon B, Facciorusso A, Lakhtakia S, Borbath I, Caillol F, Do-Cong Pham K, Rizzatti G, Forti E, Palazzo L, Belle A, Vilmann P, van Laethem JL, Mohamadnejad M, Godat S, Hindryckx P, Benson A, Tacelli M, De Nucci G, Binda C, Kovacevic B, Jacob H, Partelli S, Falconi M, Salvia R, Landoni L, Larghi A. Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Radiofrequency Ablation Versus Surgical Resection for Treatment of Pancreatic Insulinoma. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2023; 21:2834-2843.e2. [PMID: 36871765 DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2023.02.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 24.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2022] [Revised: 02/14/2023] [Accepted: 02/21/2023] [Indexed: 03/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS Endoscopic ultrasound-guided radiofrequency ablation (EUS-RFA) is emerging as a safe and effective treatment for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. We aimed to compare EUS-RFA and surgical resection for the treatment of pancreatic insulinoma (PI). METHODS Patients with sporadic PI who underwent EUS-RFA at 23 centers or surgical resection at 8 high-volume pancreatic surgery institutions between 2014 and 2022 were retrospectively identified and outcomes compared using a propensity-matching analysis. Primary outcome was safety. Secondary outcomes were clinical efficacy, hospital stay, and recurrence rate after EUS-RFA. RESULTS Using propensity score matching, 89 patients were allocated in each group (1:1), and were evenly distributed in terms of age, sex, Charlson comorbidity index, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, body mass index, distance between lesion and main pancreatic duct, lesion site, size, and grade. Adverse event (AE) rate was 18.0% and 61.8% after EUS-RFA and surgery, respectively (P < .001). No severe AEs were observed in the EUS-RFA group compared with 15.7% after surgery (P < .0001). Clinical efficacy was 100% after surgery and 95.5% after EUS-RFA (P = .160). However, the mean duration of follow-up time was shorter in the EUS-RFA group (median, 23 months; interquartile range, 14-31 months vs 37 months; interquartile range, 17.5-67 months in the surgical group; P < .0001). Hospital stay was significantly longer in the surgical group (11.1 ± 9.7 vs 3.0 ± 2.5 days in the EUS-RFA group; P < .0001). Fifteen lesions (16.9%) recurred after EUS-RFA and underwent a successful repeat EUS-RFA (11 patients) or surgical resection (4 patients). CONCLUSION EUS-RFA is safer than surgery and highly effective for the treatment of PI. If confirmed in a randomized study, EUS-RFA treatment can become first-line therapy for sporadic PI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefano Francesco Crinò
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, The Pancreas Institute, University Hospital of Verona, Verona, Italy.
| | - Bertrand Napoleon
- Service de Gastroentérologie, Hôpital Privé Jean Mermoz, Ramsay Générale de Santé, Lyon, France
| | - Antonio Facciorusso
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy
| | | | - Ivan Borbath
- Department of Hepato-gastroenterology, Cliniques Universitaires St Luc, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Fabrice Caillol
- Endoscopy Unit, Paoli Calmettes Institute, Marseille, France
| | | | - Gianenrico Rizzatti
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Edoardo Forti
- Digestive and Interventional Endoscopy Unit, ASST Niguarda, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Arthur Belle
- Department of Gastroenterology, Cochin Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Peter Vilmann
- Department of Gastroenterology, Herlev-Gentofte Hospital, Herlev, Denmark
| | - Jean-Luc van Laethem
- Hepato-Gastroenterology, Hôpital Erasme, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Mehdi Mohamadnejad
- Digestive Disease Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Sebastien Godat
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Pieter Hindryckx
- Department of Gastroenterology, University of Ghent, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Ariel Benson
- Institute of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Hadassah Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel and Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Matteo Tacelli
- Pancreato-biliary Endoscopy and EUS Division, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Germana De Nucci
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, ASST Rhodense, Garbagnate Milanese, Milan, Italy
| | - Cecilia Binda
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Ospedale Morgagni-Pierantoni, AUSL Romagna, Forlì, Italy
| | - Bojan Kovacevic
- Department of Gastroenterology, Herlev-Gentofte Hospital, Herlev, Denmark
| | - Harold Jacob
- Institute of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Hadassah Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel and Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Stefano Partelli
- Pancreatic and Transplant Surgery Unit, Pancreas Translational and Clinical Research Centre, San Raffaele IRCCS, Università Vita-Salute, Milan, Italy
| | - Massimo Falconi
- Pancreatic and Transplant Surgery Unit, Pancreas Translational and Clinical Research Centre, San Raffaele IRCCS, Università Vita-Salute, Milan, Italy
| | - Roberto Salvia
- General and Pancreatic Surgery Department, Pancreas Institute, University of Verona Hospital Trust, Verona, Italy
| | - Luca Landoni
- General and Pancreatic Surgery Department, Pancreas Institute, University of Verona Hospital Trust, Verona, Italy
| | - Alberto Larghi
- Department of Medicine, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Mangiavillano B, Crinò SF, Facciorusso A, Di Matteo F, Barbera C, Larghi A, Rizzatti G, Carrara S, Spadaccini M, Auriemma F, Fabbri C, Binda C, Coluccio C, Marocchi G, Staiano T, Conti Bellocchi MC, Bernardoni L, Eusebi LH, Cirota GG, De Nucci G, Stigliano S, Manes G, Bonanno G, Ofosu A, Lamonaca L, Paduano D, Spatola F, Repici A. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy with or without macroscopic on-site evaluation: a randomized controlled noninferiority trial. Endoscopy 2023; 55:129-137. [PMID: 36044915 DOI: 10.1055/a-1915-5263] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND : The advantage of using the macroscopic on-site evaluation (MOSE) technique during endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy (EUS-FNB) performed with 22G Franseen needles has not been investigated. We aimed to compare EUS-FNB with MOSE vs. EUS-FNB performed with three needle passes. METHODS : This randomized trial involved 10 Italian referral centers. Consecutive patients referred for EUS-FNB of pancreatic or nonpancreatic solid lesions were included in the study and randomized to the two groups. MOSE was performed by gross visualization of the collected material by the endoscopists and considered adequate when a white/yellowish aggregate core longer than 10 mm was retrieved. The primary outcome was diagnostic accuracy. Secondary outcomes were specimen adequacy, number of needle passes, and safety. RESULTS : 370 patients with 234 pancreatic lesions (63.2 %) and 136 nonpancreatic lesions (36.8 %) were randomized (190 EUS-FNB with MOSE and 180 with standard EUS-FNB). No statistically significant differences were found between EUS-FNB with MOSE and conventional EUS-FNB in terms of diagnostic accuracy (90.0 % [95 %CI 84.8 %-93.9 %] vs. 87.8 % [95 %CI 82.1 %-92.2 %]; P = 0.49), sample adequacy (93.1 % [95 %CI 88.6 %-96.3 %] vs. 95.5 % [95 %CI 91.4 %-98 %]; P = 0.31), and rate of adverse events (2.6 % vs. 1.1 %; P = 0.28). The median number of passes was significantly lower in the EUS-FNB with MOSE group (1 vs. 3; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS : The accuracy of EUS-FNB with MOSE is noninferior to that of EUS-FNB with three needle passes. MOSE reliably assesses sample adequacy and reduces the number of needle passes required to obtain the diagnosis with a 22G Franseen needle.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benedetto Mangiavillano
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Mater Domini - Castellanza, Varese, Italy.,Humanitas University, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy
| | - Stefano Francesco Crinò
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, The Pancreas Institute, G.B. Rossi University Hospital, Verona, Italy
| | - Antonio Facciorusso
- Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy
| | | | | | - Alberto Larghi
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Gianenrico Rizzatti
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Silvia Carrara
- Humanitas Clinical and Research Center - IRCCS, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Marco Spadaccini
- Humanitas Clinical and Research Center - IRCCS, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco Auriemma
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Mater Domini - Castellanza, Varese, Italy
| | - Carlo Fabbri
- Endoscopy Unit, Morgagni-Pietrantoni Hospital, Forlì-Cesena, Italy
| | - Cecilia Binda
- Endoscopy Unit, Morgagni-Pietrantoni Hospital, Forlì-Cesena, Italy
| | - Chiara Coluccio
- Endoscopy Unit, Morgagni-Pietrantoni Hospital, Forlì-Cesena, Italy
| | | | - Teresa Staiano
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Candiolo Cancer Institute IRCCS, Candiolo, Turin, Italy
| | | | - Laura Bernardoni
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, The Pancreas Institute, G.B. Rossi University Hospital, Verona, Italy
| | - Leonardo Henri Eusebi
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, S. Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, Bologna, Italy
| | - Giovanna Grazia Cirota
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, S. Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, Bologna, Italy
| | - Germana De Nucci
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, ASST Rhodense, Garbagnate Milanese, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Gianpiero Manes
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, ASST Rhodense, Garbagnate Milanese, Milan, Italy
| | - Giacomo Bonanno
- Digestive Endoscopy, Humanitas - Istituto Clinico Catanese, Catania, Italy
| | - Andrew Ofosu
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
| | - Laura Lamonaca
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Mater Domini - Castellanza, Varese, Italy
| | - Danilo Paduano
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Mater Domini - Castellanza, Varese, Italy
| | - Federica Spatola
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Mater Domini - Castellanza, Varese, Italy
| | - Alessandro Repici
- Humanitas University, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy.,Humanitas Clinical and Research Center - IRCCS, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Fiori G, Spada C, Soru P, Tontini GE, Bravi I, Cesana BM, Cesaro P, Manes G, Orsatti A, Prada A, Quadarella A, Schettino M, Spina L, Trovato C, Carnovali M, Vecchi M, Cavallaro F, Codazzi M, De Nucci G, De Roberto G, Devani M, Di Paolo D, Elli L, Hinkel C, Jakobs R, Janke D, Lombardo V, Lovera M, Radaelli F, Ravizza D, Uebel P, Valats JC, Vollmar J, Zimmermann T, Ciprandi G. Pharmacokinetics of oral mannitol for bowel preparation for colonoscopy. Clin Transl Sci 2022; 15:2448-2457. [PMID: 37074807 PMCID: PMC9579383 DOI: 10.1111/cts.13373] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2022] [Revised: 06/16/2022] [Accepted: 07/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
This study aimed to define the pharmacokinetics (PKs) of oral mannitol used as an osmotic laxative for bowel preparation for colonoscopy. The PKs of oral mannitol was evaluated in a substudy as part of a phase II dose‐finding, international, multicenter, randomized, parallel‐group, endoscopist‐blinded study. Patients were randomly assigned to take 50, 100, or 150 g mannitol. Venous blood samples were drawn at baseline (T0), 1 h (T1), 2 h (T2), 4 h (T4), and 8 h (T8) after completion of mannitol self‐administration. The mean mannitol plasma concentrations (mg/ml) were dose‐dependent with a consistent difference among doses. The mean maximum concentration (Cmax) ± SD was 0.63 ± 0.15, 1.02 ± 0.28, and 1.36 ± 0.39 mg/ml, in the three dosage groups, respectively. The mean area under the curve from zero to infinity (AUC0−∞) was 2.667 ± 0.668, 4.992 ± 1.706, and 7.403 ± 3.472 mg/ml*h in the 50, 100, and 150 g mannitol dose groups, respectively. Bioavailability was similar in the three dose groups and was just over 20% (0.243 ± 0.073, 0.209 ± 0.081, and 0.228 ± 0.093 in the 50, 100, and 150 g mannitol dose groups, respectively). The present study showed that the bioavailability of oral mannitol is just over 20% and is similar for the three tested doses (50, 100, and 150 g). The linear increase in Cmax, AUC0−t8, and AUC0−∞ must be considered when choosing the oral mannitol dose for bowel preparation to avoid its systemic osmotic effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giancarla Fiori
- Divisione di Endoscopia, Istituto Europeo di Oncologia IRCCS Milan Italy
| | - Cristiano Spada
- U.O. Endoscopia Digestiva, Fondazione Poliambulanza – Istituto Ospedaliero Brescia Italy
| | - Pietro Soru
- Divisione di Endoscopia, Istituto Europeo di Oncologia IRCCS Milan Italy
| | - Gian Eugenio Tontini
- Department of Pathophysiology and Organ Transplantation University of Milan Milan Italy
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit IRCCS Fondazione Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico Milan Italy
| | - Ivana Bravi
- Divisione di Endoscopia, Istituto Europeo di Oncologia IRCCS Milan Italy
| | - Bruno Mario Cesana
- Department of Molecular and Transactional Medicine, Statistics and Biomathematics Unit, Faculty of Medicine and Surgery University of Brescia Brescia Italy
| | - Paola Cesaro
- U.O. Endoscopia Digestiva, Fondazione Poliambulanza – Istituto Ospedaliero Brescia Italy
| | - Gianpiero Manes
- U.O.C. Gastroenterologia, ASST Rhodense Presidi di Rho e Garbagnate Garbagnate Milanese (MI) Italy
| | | | - Alberto Prada
- Servizio Gastroenterologia ed Endoscopia Digestiva Istituto Auxologico Italiano Milan Italy
| | - Alessandro Quadarella
- U.O. Endoscopia Digestiva, Fondazione Poliambulanza – Istituto Ospedaliero Brescia Italy
| | - Mario Schettino
- U.O.C. Gastroenterologia, ASST Rhodense Presidi di Rho e Garbagnate Garbagnate Milanese (MI) Italy
| | - Luisa Spina
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit IRCCS Fondazione Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico Milan Italy
| | - Cristina Trovato
- Divisione di Endoscopia, Istituto Europeo di Oncologia IRCCS Milan Italy
| | | | - Maurizio Vecchi
- Department of Pathophysiology and Organ Transplantation University of Milan Milan Italy
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit IRCCS Fondazione Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico Milan Italy
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Mangiavillano B, Spatola F, Facciorusso A, De Nucci G, Ligresti D, Henry Eusebi L, Lisotti A, Auriemma F, Lamonaca L, Paduano D, Crinò S, Scarlata S, Troncone E, Del Vecchio Blanco G, Manes G, Traina M, Bertani A, Ofosu A, Binda C, Fabbri C, Muscatiello N, Fusaroli P, Repici A, Carrara S. Transesophageal endoscopic ultrasound in the diagnosis of the lung masses: a multicenter experience with fine-needle aspiration and fine-needle biopsy needles. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2022; 34:757-762. [PMID: 35482928 DOI: 10.1097/meg.0000000000002383] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/10/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIM Intraparenchymal lung masses inaccessible through bronchoscopy or endobronchial ultrasound guidance pose a diagnostic challenge. Furthermore, some fragile or hypoxic patients may be poor candidates for transbronchial approaches. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration/biopsy (EUS-FNA/FNB) offers a potential diagnostic approach to lung cancers adjacent to the esophagus. We aimed to evaluate the feasibility, accuracy, and safety of trans-esophageal EUS-FNA/FNB for tissue sampling of pulmonary nodules. METHODS We retrospectively analyzed data from patients with pulmonary lesions who underwent EUS-FNA/FNB between March 2015 and August 2021 at eight Italian endoscopic referral centers. RESULTS A total of 47 patients (36 male; mean age 64.47 ± 9.05 years) were included (22 EUS-FNAs and 25 EUS-FNBs). Overall diagnostic accuracy rate was 88.9% (76.3-96.2%). The sensitivity and diagnostic accuracy were superior for EUS FNB sampling versus EUS-FNA (100% vs. 78.73%); P = 0.05, and (100% vs. 78.57%); P = 0.05, respectively. Additionally, sample adequacy was superior for EUS-FNB sampling versus EUS-FNA (100% vs. 78.5%); P = 0.05. Multivariate logistic regression analysis for diagnostic accuracy showed nodule size at the cutoff of 15 mm (OR 2.29, 1.04-5.5, P = 0.05) and use of FNB needle (OR 4.33, 1.05-6.31, P = 0.05) as significant predictors of higher diagnostic accuracy. There were no procedure-related adverse events. CONCLUSION This study highlights the efficacy and safety of EUS-FNA/FNB as a minimally invasive procedure for diagnosing and staging peri-esophageal parenchymal lung lesions. The diagnostic yield of EUS-FNB was superior to EUS-FNA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benedetto Mangiavillano
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Mater Domini, Castellanza VA
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Via Rita Levi Montalcini 4, Pieve Emanuele, Milan
| | - Federica Spatola
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Via Rita Levi Montalcini 4, Pieve Emanuele, Milan
- Section of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Department of Health Promotion, Mother and Child Care, Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties, PROMISE, University of Palermo, Palermo
| | - Antonio Facciorusso
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Endoscopy Unit, University of Foggia, Foggia
| | - Germana De Nucci
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, ASST Rhodense, Garbagnate Milanese, Milan
| | - Dario Ligresti
- Digestive Endoscopy Service, Department of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Services, IRCCS - ISMETT, Palermo
| | - Leonardo Henry Eusebi
- Division of Gastroenterology and Endoscopy, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, S. Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, Bologna
| | - Andrea Lisotti
- Gastroenterology Unit, Hospital of Imola, University of Bologna, Imola
| | | | - Laura Lamonaca
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Mater Domini, Castellanza VA
| | - Danilo Paduano
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Mater Domini, Castellanza VA
| | - Stefano Crinò
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, The Pancreas Institute, G.B. Rossi University Hospital, Verona
| | - Simone Scarlata
- Geriatrics, Unit of Respiratory Pathophysiology, Campus Bio-Medico University and Teaching Hospital, Rome
| | - Edoardo Troncone
- Department of Systems Medicine, Gastroenterology Unit, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", Rome
| | | | - Giampiero Manes
- Digestive Endoscopy Service, Department of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Services, IRCCS - ISMETT, Palermo
| | - Mario Traina
- Digestive Endoscopy Service, Department of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Services, IRCCS - ISMETT, Palermo
| | - Alessandro Bertani
- IRCCS - ISMETT, Thoracic Surgery, Department for the Treatment and Study of Cardiothoracic Diseases and Cardiothoracic Transplantation, Palermo, Italy
| | - Andrew Ofosu
- Division of Digestive Diseases, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH
| | - Cecilia Binda
- Digestive Endoscopy and Gastroenterology Unit, AUSL Romagna, Morgagni-Pierantoni Hospital and Bufalini Hospital, Forlì- Cesena
| | - Carlo Fabbri
- Digestive Endoscopy and Gastroenterology Unit, AUSL Romagna, Morgagni-Pierantoni Hospital and Bufalini Hospital, Forlì- Cesena
| | - Nicola Muscatiello
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Endoscopy Unit, University of Foggia, Foggia
| | - Pietro Fusaroli
- Gastroenterology Unit, Hospital of Imola, University of Bologna, Imola
| | - Alessandro Repici
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Via Rita Levi Montalcini 4, Pieve Emanuele, Milan
- IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital - Endoscopic Unit, Department of Gastroenterology, via Manzoni 56, 20089 Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Silvia Carrara
- IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital - Endoscopic Unit, Department of Gastroenterology, via Manzoni 56, 20089 Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Antolino L, D'Angelo F, Scarpino S, De Nucci G, Bianco G, Aurello P, Petrucciani N, Segreto M, Santoro R, Nigri G, Agnes S, Ramacciato G. TP53 Arg72Pro polymorphism in pancreatic cancer: a novel risk factor? European Journal of Surgical Oncology 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2021.12.217] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|
7
|
Radaelli F, Frazzoni L, Repici A, Rondonotti E, Mussetto A, Feletti V, Spada C, Manes G, Segato S, Grassi E, Musso A, Di Giulio E, Coluccio C, Manno M, De Nucci G, Festa V, Di Leo A, Marini M, Ferraris L, Feliziani M, Amato A, Soriani P, Del Bono C, Paggi S, Hassan C, Fuccio L. Clinical management and patient outcomes of acute lower gastrointestinal bleeding. A multicenter, prospective, cohort study. Dig Liver Dis 2021; 53:1141-1147. [PMID: 33509737 DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2021.01.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2020] [Revised: 01/02/2021] [Accepted: 01/05/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIM Although acute lower GI bleeding (LGIB) represents a significant healthcare burden, prospective real-life data on management and outcomes are scanty. Present multicentre, prospective cohort study was aimed at evaluating mortality and associated risk factors and at describing patient management. METHODS Adult outpatients acutely admitted for or developing LGIB during hospitalization were consecutively enrolled in 15 high-volume referral centers. Demographics, comorbidities, medications, interventions and outcomes were recorded. RESULTS Overall 1,198 patients (1060 new admissions;138 inpatients) were included. Most patients were elderly (mean-age 74±15 years), 31% had a Charlson-Comorbidity-Index ≥3, 58% were on antithrombotic therapy. In-hospital mortality (primary outcome) was 3.4% (95%CI 2.5-4.6). At logistic regression analysis, independent predictors of mortality were increasing age, comorbidity, inpatient status, hemodynamic instability at presentation, and ICU-admission. Colonoscopy had a 78.8% diagnostic yield, with significantly higher hemostasis rate when performed within 24-hours than later (21.3% vs.10.8%, p = 0.027). Endoscopic hemostasis was associated with neither in-hospital mortality nor rebleeding. A definite or presumptive source of bleeding was disclosed in 90.4% of investigated patients. CONCLUSION Mortality in LGIB patients is mainly related to age and comorbidities. Although early colonoscopy has a relevant diagnostic yield and is associated with higher therapeutic intervention rate, endoscopic hemostasis is not associated with improved clinical outcomes [ClinicalTrial.gov number: NCT04364412].
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Alessandro Repici
- Istituto Clinico Humanitas, Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Italy
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Sergio Segato
- Ospedale di Circolo e Fondazione Macchi, Varese, Italy
| | | | - Alessandro Musso
- Città della Salute e della Scienza, Presidio Le Molinette, Torino, Italy
| | | | | | - Mauro Manno
- Azienda USL di Modena, Ospedale di Carpi e Mirandola, Italy
| | | | | | | | - Mario Marini
- Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Senese, Siena, Italy
| | - Luca Ferraris
- ASST Valle Olona, Presidio Ospedaliero di Gallarate, Italy
| | | | - Arnaldo Amato
- Gastroenterology Unit, Ospedale Valduce, Como, Italy
| | - Paola Soriani
- Azienda USL di Modena, Ospedale di Carpi e Mirandola, Italy
| | - Chiara Del Bono
- Policlinico Sant'Orsola Malpighi, Università di Bologna, Italy
| | - Silvia Paggi
- Gastroenterology Unit, Ospedale Valduce, Como, Italy
| | | | - Lorenzo Fuccio
- Policlinico Sant'Orsola Malpighi, Università di Bologna, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Nicola M, Onorati M, Albertoni MM, Bianchi CL, De Nucci G, Mandelli ED, Nicola L, Di Nuovo F. Fine Needle Aspiration versus Fine Needle Biopsy of Biliopancreatic Lesions: Are They Really Opposing Techniques or Can They Be Complementary? Our Experience in a Large Cohort of Cases from a Single Institution. Acta Cytol 2020; 65:40-47. [PMID: 33099544 DOI: 10.1159/000510755] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2020] [Accepted: 08/07/2020] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Nowadays, endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided fine needle aspiration (FNA), and fine needle biopsy (FNB) are considered the best procedures for the diagnosis of biliopancreatic lesions. These methods represent a milestone since they proved to be both safe for the patient and useful to achieve diagnostic material useful to plan the best treatment strategy. OBJECTIVE Since in the literature, a debate between cytology and histology supporters is still ongoing and the trend is changing in favor of FNB, we would like to present our experience about the diagnostic yield of FNA and FNB. The aim of our study is to highlight FNA versus FNB diagnostic role of biliopancreatic lesions, highlight advantages, and drawbacks of these procedures, and our view on these 2 procedures and whether they should still be considered complementary or opposing techniques. METHODS We retrospectively reviewed our hospital series of 469 EUS diagnostics procedures of biliopancreatic lesions performed in 419 patients, between 2015 and 2019. RESULTS The overall adequacy rates of FNA and FNB were, respectively, 98.9 and 100%. Stratifying cases according to anatomic location of the mass (pancreas vs. biliary system), we detected 168 malignancies out of 349 pancreatic lesions (168/349; 48.1%), while biliary system cases positive for malignancy represented 33.8% (23/68 cases) (p value = 0.045, χ2 test). As for concomitant FNB, our series displayed a high rate of diagnostic concordance (88.8%). CONCLUSIONS Despite numerous data published, it is still unclear which is the most feasible method to use; therefore, we compared FNA, FNB, or their combination to understand the best applicable technique. Our experience confirmed that FNA is extremely efficient in the diagnosis of biliopancreatic lesions, especially in the hands of expert endoscopists and pathologists. Considering anatomic location, EUS-FNA is more accurate for mass-forming neoplasms in the pancreatic parenchyma rather than for lesions of the biliary system. Moreover, concomitant FNB usually confirmed the cytological diagnosis, allowing a deeper immunohistochemical characterization of the neoplasia. This proves that a "pure" cytology and "pure" histology approach should be looked differently since these are complementary techniques especially if we can obtain a cellblock from FNA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marta Nicola
- Pathology Unit, ASST Rhodense, Garbagnate Milanese, Italy,
| | - Monica Onorati
- Pathology Unit, ASST Rhodense, Garbagnate Milanese, Italy
| | | | | | - Germana De Nucci
- Gastroenterology Unit, ASST Rhodense, Garbagnate Milanese, Italy
| | | | - Lidia Nicola
- Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Barresi L, Tacelli M, Crinò SF, Attili F, Petrone MC, De Nucci G, Carrara S, Manfredi G, Capurso G, De Angelis CG, Crocellà L, Fantin A, Dore MF, Garribba AT, Tarantino I, De Pretis N, Pagliari D, Rossi G, Manes G, Preatoni P, Barbuscio I, Tuzzolino F, Traina M, Frulloni L, Costamagna G, Arcidiacono PG, Buscarini E, Pezzilli R. Multicentric Italian survey on daily practice for autoimmune pancreatitis: Clinical data, diagnosis, treatment, and evolution toward pancreatic insufficiency. United European Gastroenterol J 2020; 8:705-715. [PMID: 32397913 DOI: 10.1177/2050640620924302] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) is a rare, and relatively new, form of chronic pancreatitis. The management of AIP can vary considerably among different centres in daily clinical practice. OBJECTIVES The aim of this study is to present a picture of epidemiological, clinical characteristics, outcomes, and the real-life practice in terms of management in several academic and non-academic centres in Italy. METHODS Data on the clinical presentation, diagnostic work-up, treatments, frequency of relapses, and long-term outcomes were retrospectively collected in a cohort of AIP patients diagnosed at 14 centres in Italy. RESULTS One hundred and six patients were classified as type 1 AIP, 48 as type 2 AIP, and 19 as not otherwise specified. Epidemiological, clinical, radiological, and serological characteristics, and relapses were similar to those previously reported for different types of AIP. Endoscopic cytohistology was available in 46.2% of cases, and diagnostic for AIP in only 35.2%. Steroid trial to aid diagnosis was administered in 43.3% cases, and effective in 93.3%. Steroid therapy was used in 70.5% of cases, and effective in 92.6% of patients. Maintenance therapy with low dose of steroid (MST) was prescribed in 25.4% of cases at a mean dose of 5 (±1.4) mg/die, and median time of MST was 60 days. Immunosuppressive drugs were rarely used (10.9%), and rituximab in 1.7%. Faecal elastase-1 was evaluated in only 31.2% of patients, and was pathological in 59.2%. CONCLUSIONS In this cohort of AIP patients, diagnosis and classification for subtype was frequently possible, confirming the different characteristics of AIP1 and AIP2 previously reported. Nevertheless, we observed a low use of histology and steroid trial for a diagnosis of AIP. Steroid treatment was the most used therapy in our cohort. Immunosuppressants and rituximab were rarely used. The evaluation of exocrine pancreatic insufficiency is underemployed considering its high prevalence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luca Barresi
- Endoscopy Service, Department of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Services, IRCCS-ISMETT (Mediterranean Institute for Transplantation and Highly Specialized Therapies), Palermo, Italy
| | - Matteo Tacelli
- Endoscopy Service, Department of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Services, IRCCS-ISMETT (Mediterranean Institute for Transplantation and Highly Specialized Therapies), Palermo, Italy.,Section of Gastroenterology, Biomedical Department of Internal and Specialized Medicine (DI.BI.M.I.S.), University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| | - Stefano Francesco Crinò
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, The Pancreas Institute, University Hospital of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Fabia Attili
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy
| | - Maria Chiara Petrone
- Pancreato-Biliary Endoscopy and Endosonography Division, Pancreas Translational and Clinical Research Center, San Raffaele Scientific Institute IRCCS, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milano, Italy
| | - Germana De Nucci
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, ASST Rhodense, Garbagnate Milanese Hospitals, Milano, Italy
| | - Silvia Carrara
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Division of Gastroenterology, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center-IRCCS Rozzano (MI), Italy
| | - Guido Manfredi
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Department, Maggiore Hospital, ASST Crema, Crema, Italy
| | - Gabriele Capurso
- Pancreato-Biliary Endoscopy and Endosonography Division, Pancreas Translational and Clinical Research Center, San Raffaele Scientific Institute IRCCS, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milano, Italy.,Digestive and Liver Disease Unit, S. Andrea Hospital, Roma, Italy
| | | | - Lucia Crocellà
- Gastroenterology Unit, Mauriziano Umberto I Hospital, Torino, Italy
| | - Alberto Fantin
- Department of Surgical, Oncological and Gastroenterological Sciences, Gastroenterology Division, Azienda Ospedaliera di Padova, University of Padova, Padua, Italy
| | | | | | - Ilaria Tarantino
- Endoscopy Service, Department of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Services, IRCCS-ISMETT (Mediterranean Institute for Transplantation and Highly Specialized Therapies), Palermo, Italy
| | - Nicolò De Pretis
- Gastroenterology unit, Pancreas center, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Danilo Pagliari
- Division of Internal Medicine and Gastroenterology & Pancreatic Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli-IRCCS, Universita' del Sacro Cuore, Roma, Italy
| | - Gemma Rossi
- Pancreato-Biliary Endoscopy and Endosonography Division, Pancreas Translational and Clinical Research Center, San Raffaele Scientific Institute IRCCS, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milano, Italy
| | - Gianpiero Manes
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, ASST Rhodense, Garbagnate Milanese Hospitals, Milano, Italy
| | - Paoletta Preatoni
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Division of Gastroenterology, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center-IRCCS Rozzano (MI), Italy
| | - Ilenia Barbuscio
- Endoscopy Service, Department of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Services, IRCCS-ISMETT (Mediterranean Institute for Transplantation and Highly Specialized Therapies), Palermo, Italy.,Department of Surgical, Oncological and Gastroenterological Sciences, Gastroenterology Division, Azienda Ospedaliera di Padova, University of Padova, Padua, Italy
| | - Fabio Tuzzolino
- Research Office, IRCCS ISMETT (Mediterranean Institute for Transplantation and Advanced Specialized Therapies), Palermo, Italy
| | - Mario Traina
- Endoscopy Service, Department of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Services, IRCCS-ISMETT (Mediterranean Institute for Transplantation and Highly Specialized Therapies), Palermo, Italy
| | - Luca Frulloni
- Gastroenterology unit, Pancreas center, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Guido Costamagna
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy.,Centre for Endoscopic Research Therapeutics and Training-CERTT, Università del SacroCuore, Roma, Italy
| | - Paolo Giorgio Arcidiacono
- Pancreato-Biliary Endoscopy and Endosonography Division, Pancreas Translational and Clinical Research Center, San Raffaele Scientific Institute IRCCS, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milano, Italy
| | - Elisabetta Buscarini
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Department, Maggiore Hospital, ASST Crema, Crema, Italy
| | - Raffaele Pezzilli
- Pancreas Unit, Department of Gastroenterology, Sant'Orsola Polyclinic, Bologna, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Grassia R, Imperatore N, Capone P, Cereatti F, Forti E, Antonini F, Tanzi GP, Martinotti M, Buffoli F, Mutignani M, Macarri G, Manes G, Vecchi M, De Nucci G. EUS-guided tissue acquisition in chronic pancreatitis: Differential diagnosis between pancreatic cancer and pseudotumoral masses using EUS-FNA or core biopsy. Endosc Ultrasound 2020; 9:122-129. [PMID: 32295970 PMCID: PMC7279087 DOI: 10.4103/eus.eus_75_19] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and Objective: EUS-FNA sensitivity for malignancy in parenchymal masses of patients with concurrent chronic pancreatitis (CP) has been reported to be unsatisfactory. The aim of the present study was to directly compare the diagnostic accuracy of EUS-FNA and EUS-fine-needle biopsy (FNB) in differentiating between inflammatory masses and malignancies in the setting of CP. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of prospective, multicentric databases of all patients with pancreatic masses and clinico-radiological-endosonographic features of CP who underwent EUS-FNA or FNB. Results: Among 1124 patients with CP, 210 patients (60% males, mean age: 62.7 years) with CP and pancreatic masses met the inclusion criteria and were enrolled. In the FNA group (110 patients), a correct diagnosis was obtained in all but 18 cases (diagnostic accuracy 83.6%, sensitivity 69.5%, specificity 100%, positive predictive value [PPV] 100%, and negative predictive value [NPV] 73.9%); by contrast, among 100 patients undergoing FNB, a correct diagnosis was obtained in all but seven cases (diagnostic accuracy 93%, sensitivity 86.8%, specificity 100%, PPV 100%, and NPV 87%) (P = 0.03, 0.03, 1, 1, and 0.07, respectively). At binary logistic regression, focal pancreatitis (odds of event occurrence [OR]: 4.9; P < 0.001), higher Ca19-9 (OR: 2.3; P = 0.02), and FNB (OR: 2.5; P < 0.01) were the only independent factors associated with a correct diagnosis. Conclusion: EUS-FNB is effective in the differential diagnosis between pseudotumoral masses and solid neoplasms in CP, showing higher diagnostic accuracy and sensitivity than EUS-FNA. EUS-FNB should be considered the preferred diagnostic technique for diagnosing cancer in the setting of CP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roberto Grassia
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Cremona Hospital, Cremona, Italy
| | - Nicola Imperatore
- Gastroenterology, Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, School of Medicine, "Federico II" of Naples, Naples, Italy
| | - Pietro Capone
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Hospital "A. Maresca", Torre del Greco, Naples, Italy
| | - Fabrizio Cereatti
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Cremona Hospital, Cremona, Italy
| | - Edoardo Forti
- Gastroenterology Unit, Niguarda Ca' Granda Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Filippo Antonini
- Department of Gastroenterology, A. Murri Hospital, Polytechnic University of Marche, Fermo, Italy
| | | | | | - Federico Buffoli
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Cremona Hospital, Cremona, Italy
| | | | - Giampiero Macarri
- Department of Gastroenterology, A. Murri Hospital, Polytechnic University of Marche, Fermo, Italy
| | - Gianpiero Manes
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, A.O. Salvini, Garbagnate Milanese, Milan, Italy
| | - Maurizio Vecchi
- Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, San Donato Milanese, Milan, Italy
| | - Germana De Nucci
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, A.O. Salvini, Garbagnate Milanese, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Amato A, Radaelli F, Correale L, Di Giulio E, Buda A, Cennamo V, Fuccio L, Devani M, Tarantino O, Fiori G, De Nucci G, De Bellis M, Hassan C, Repici A. Intra-procedural and delayed bleeding after resection of large colorectal lesions: The SCALP study. United European Gastroenterol J 2019; 7:1361-1372. [PMID: 31839962 DOI: 10.1177/2050640619874176] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2019] [Accepted: 08/12/2019] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and aim The safety of endoscopic resection of large colorectal lesions (LCLs) (≥20 mm) is clinically relevant. The aim of the present study was to assess the rate of post-resection adverse events (AEs) in a real-life setting. Patients and methods In a prospective, multicentre, observational study, data from consecutive resections of LCLs over a 6-month period were collected in 24 centres. Patients were followed up at 15 days from resection for AEs. The primary endpoint was intra-procedural bleeding according to lesion morphology. Secondary endpoints were delayed bleeding and perforation. Patient and polyp characteristics, and polypectomy techniques were analysed with respect to the bleeding events. Results In total, 1504 patients (female/male: 633/871, mean age, 66.1) with 1648 LCLs (29.1% pedunculated and 70.9% non-pedunculated lesions) were included. Overall, 168 (11.2%) patients had post-resection bleeding (8.5 and 2.0% immediate and delayed, respectively), while 15 (1.0%) cases of perforation occurred. Independent predictors of immediate bleeding for pedunculated lesions were bleeding prophylaxis (odds ratio (OR) 0.28, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.13-0.62), simple polypectomy (versus endoscopic mucosal resection, OR 0.38, 95% CI 0.17-0.88) and inpatient setting (OR 2.21, 95% CI 1.07-5.08), while bleeding prophylaxis (OR 0.37, 95% CI 0.30-0.98), academic setting (OR 0.27, 95% CI 0.12-0.54) and size (OR 1.03, 95% CI 1.00-1.05) were predictors for those non-pedunculated. Indication for colonoscopy (screening versus diagnostic (OR 0.33, 95% CI 0.12-0.86)), antithrombotic therapy (OR 3.12, 95% CI 1.54-6.39) and size (OR 2.34, 95% CI 1.12-4.87) independently predicted delayed bleeding. Conclusions A low rate of post-resection AEs was observed in a real-life setting, reassuring as to the safety of endoscopic resection of ≥2 cm colorectal lesions. Bleeding prophylaxis reduced the intra-procedural bleeding risk, while antithrombotic therapy increased delayed bleeding.CLINICALTRIAL: (NCT02694120).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arnaldo Amato
- Division of Digestive Endoscopy and Gastroenterology, Valduce Hospital, Como, Italy
| | - Franco Radaelli
- Division of Digestive Endoscopy and Gastroenterology, Valduce Hospital, Como, Italy
| | - Loredana Correale
- Department of Gastroenterology, Nuovo Regina Margherita Hospital, Roma, Italy
| | | | - Andrea Buda
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, S.Maria del Prato Hospital, Feltre, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Cennamo
- Unit of Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy, Maggiore Hospital, Bologna, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Fuccio
- Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Policlinico S. Orsola, Bologna, Italy
| | - Massimo Devani
- Department of Gastroenterology, Rho Hospital, Rho, Italy
| | | | - Giancarla Fiori
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, European Institute of Oncology, Milano, Italy
| | - Germana De Nucci
- Department of Gastroenterology, Salvini Hospital, Garbagnate, Italy
| | - Mario De Bellis
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, Department of Abdominal Oncology, Istituto Nazionale Tumore, Napoli, Italy
| | - Cesare Hassan
- Department of Gastroenterology, Nuovo Regina Margherita Hospital, Roma, Italy
| | - Alessandro Repici
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Division of Gastroenterology, Humanitas Research Hospital, Milano, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Crinò SF, Manfrin E, Scarpa A, Baldaque-Silva F, Carrara S, De Nucci G, Di Mitri R, Ginés A, Iglesias-Garcia J, Itoi T, Kitano M, Nguyen NQ, Deprez PH, Poley JW, Shami VM, Tarantino I, Larghi A. EUS-FNB with or without on-site evaluation for the diagnosis of solid pancreatic lesions (FROSENOR): Protocol for a multicenter randomized non-inferiority trial. Dig Liver Dis 2019; 51:901-906. [PMID: 30975612 DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2019.03.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2019] [Accepted: 03/14/2019] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE) of cytological specimensacquired with EUS-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) represents the most accurate available technique to reach a definitive diagnosis in patients with pancreatic solid masses. Recently, needles with high histological yield have been developed for EUS-guided fine needle biopsy (EUS-FNB), with which the need for ROSE can be potentially overcome. AIMS The primary aim is to compare the diagnostic accuracy of EUS-FNB with or without ROSE. The main endpoint will be measured against the gold standard diagnosis (surgical pathology whenever available or diagnostic work-up in agreement with a clinical course of at least six months). Secondary endpoints include: (a) safety; (b) presence of tissue core; (c) quality of specimens; (d) time of the sampling procedure. Reliability of macroscopic on-site evaluation (MOSE) by endosonographers will be also assessed. METHODS FROSENOR is an international randomized non-inferiority ongoing study at sixteen centers in four continents. Eight hundred patients will be randomized in two arms (EUS-FNB + ROSE vs. EUS-FNB alone) and outcomes compared. Sample size has been calculated in order to demonstrate the non-inferiority of FNB alone. Randomization and data collection will be performed online. DISCUSSION This study will ascertain if ROSE is still needed when performing EUS-FNB of solid pancreatic lesions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefano Francesco Crinò
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, The Pancreas Institute, G.B. Rossi University Hospital, Verona, Italy.
| | - Ermina Manfrin
- Department of Diagnostics and Public Health, G.B. Rossi University Hospital, Verona, Italy
| | - Aldo Scarpa
- Department of Diagnostics and Public Health, G.B. Rossi University Hospital, Verona, Italy; ARC-Net Research Centre, G.B. Rossi University Hospital, Verona, Italy
| | - Francisco Baldaque-Silva
- Department of Upper GI Diseases, Unit of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, Karolinska University Hospital and Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Silvia Carrara
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Division of Gastroenterology, Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Germana De Nucci
- Department of Gastroenterology, Rho and Garbagnate Milanese Hospital, ASST Rhodense, Milano, Italy
| | - Roberto Di Mitri
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, Arnas Civico Di Cristina Benfratelli Hospital, Palermo, Italy
| | - Angel Ginés
- Gastrointestinal Department, Clinic Hospital of Barcelona, IDIBAPS, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Julio Iglesias-Garcia
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital of Santiago de Compostela, Spain
| | - Takao Itoi
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Masayuki Kitano
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kindai University School of Medicine, Osakasayama, Japan
| | - Nam Quoc Nguyen
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Pierre H Deprez
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Clinic of Saint-Luc, Catholic University of Leuven, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Jan-Werner Poley
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Vanessa M Shami
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - Ilaria Tarantino
- Endoscopy Service, Department of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Services, Mediterranean Institute for Transplantation and Advanced Specialized, Palermo, Italy
| | - Alberto Larghi
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, University Hospital A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Roma, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Antonini F, Delconte G, Fuccio L, De Nucci G, Fabbri C, Armellini E, Frazzoni L, Fornelli A, Magarotto A, Mandelli E, Occhipinti P, Masci E, Manes G, Macarri G. EUS-guided tissue sampling with a 20-gauge core biopsy needle for the characterization of gastrointestinal subepithelial lesions: A multicenter study. Endosc Ultrasound 2019; 8:105-110. [PMID: 29770781 PMCID: PMC6482599 DOI: 10.4103/eus.eus_1_18] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and Objective: A new 20-gauge (G) biopsy needle with a core-trap technology has been developed with a large core size and enhanced flexibility. The aim of this multicenter study was to determine the feasibility, efficacy, and safety of EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy (EUS-FNB) with the new 20G needle in diagnosing subepithelial lesions (SELs). Materials and Methods: Retrospectively collected data from consecutive patients with SELs undergoing EUS-FNB with the 20G needle at five centers were analyzed. Results: A total of 50 SELs were included. The mean lesion size was 43.1 ± 17.5 mm. The lesion locations were esophagus (n = 1), stomach (n = 37), distal duodenum (n = 5), rectum (n = 6), and colon (n = 1). The procedure was technically feasible in all patients. Definitive diagnosis with full histological assessment including immunohistochemistry was obtained in 88% (44/50) of the patients. Considering malignant versus benign lesions, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were 85% (95% confidence interval [CI] 70.2–94.3), 100% (95% CI 58.7%–100%), 100% (95% CI 85.1%–100%), and 62.5 (95% CI 27.7–84.8), respectively. No major complications requiring additional care have been observed. Conclusions: In this multicenter study, we found that EUS-FNB with the new 20G core needle is an effective and safe method for the diagnosis of SELs with a high rate of producing adequate histological material and high diagnostic accuracy even from difficult-to-approach anatomical locations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Filippo Antonini
- Unit of Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy, Augusto Murri Hospital, Fermo, Italy
| | - Gabriele Delconte
- Diagnostic and Therapeutic Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milano, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Fuccio
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Sant'Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, Bologna, Italy
| | - Germana De Nucci
- Unit of Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy, ASST Rhodense, Garbagnate Milanese (MI), Italy
| | - Carlo Fabbri
- Unit of Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy, AUSL Bologna, Bellaria-Maggiore Hospital, Bologna, Italy
| | - Elia Armellini
- Division of Gastroenterology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria "Maggiore della Carità", Novara, Italy
| | - Leonardo Frazzoni
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Sant'Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, Bologna, Italy
| | - Adele Fornelli
- Unit of Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy, AUSL Bologna, Bellaria-Maggiore Hospital, Bologna, Italy
| | - Andrea Magarotto
- Diagnostic and Therapeutic Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milano, Italy
| | - Enzo Mandelli
- Unit of Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy, ASST Rhodense, Garbagnate Milanese (MI), Italy
| | - Pietro Occhipinti
- Division of Gastroenterology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria "Maggiore della Carità", Novara, Italy
| | - Enzo Masci
- Diagnostic and Therapeutic Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milano, Italy
| | - Gianpiero Manes
- Unit of Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy, ASST Rhodense, Garbagnate Milanese (MI), Italy
| | - Giampiero Macarri
- Unit of Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy, Augusto Murri Hospital, Fermo, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
La Rocca F, Molino C, Petrocelli M, Di Capua F, Fusco F, De Nucci G, De Sena G. A case of obscure gastrointestinal bleeding in a 18-year-old woman. Ann Ital Chir 2014; 85:S2239253X14022257. [PMID: 32516875] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
In this report, we discuss a case of an 18 year-old woman with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding (OGIB) revealed to be originated from a Meckel's diverticulum. OGIB is defined as persistent or recurrent bleeding from a difficult to identify source and accounts for approximately 5% of all cases of GI bleeding. Lesions in the small bowel most commonly cause it. OGIB represents one of the most challenging disorders faced by gastroenterologists due to its evasive nature and difficulty in identifying the exact source of the bleeding. Recent technological advances such as capsule endoscopy, balloon-assisted enteroscopy, spiral enteroscopy and CTE have significantly improved our ability to diagnose and manage these patients. We report this case to assess the importance of laparoscopy that nowadays is the only procedure that successfully detected the site of bleeding in up to 100% of cases. KEY WORDS: Enterorrhagia, Gastrointestinal bleeding, Meckel's diverticulum, Obscure gastrointestinal bleeding.
Collapse
|
15
|
Manguso F, Riccio E, Bennato R, Picascia S, Martino R, De Nucci G, Fiorito R, Balzano A. In-hospital mortality in non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding Forrest 1 patients. Scand J Gastroenterol 2009; 43:1432-41. [PMID: 18759153 DOI: 10.1080/00365520802307989] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding (NVUGIB) is recognized world-wide as a common cause of emergency hospitalization, and it often represents a life-threatening event. The purpose of this prospective study was to assess in-hospital mortality in NVUGIB Forrest 1 patients admitted to the emergency unit owing to active bleeding. MATERIAL AND METHODS We enrolled all patients consecutively admitted to the emergency unit for NVUGIB, acutely bleeding at endoscopy (spurting or oozing). Demographic characteristics, clinical and biochemical parameters, endoscopic findings and treatments were evaluated. RESULTS Of a total of 142 patients (98 M (69%), mean age+/-SD=66+/-14 years), spurting (16 (11.3%)) and oozing (126 (88.7%)) were identified. All patients received endoscopic treatment within 6 h of admission and were managed according to the guidelines. Seventeen (12%) patients suffered rebleeding, 4 patients (2.8%) required surgery to stop the bleeding, and 8 (5.6%) died during hospitalization (4 within 5 days and the remainder within 24 days of admission) - 3 as a consequence of bleeding (2.1%) and 5 of non-surgical complications (3.5%). Cox regression analysis showed that the lesions in more than one segment of the esophagogastroduodenal tract (p=0.008, hazard ratio (95% CI)=7.623 (1.680-34.600)) and the number of blood units transfused during the first 48 h of hospitalization (p=0.038, 2.075 (1.041-4.135)) were predictive of in-hospital death. CONCLUSIONS In Forrest 1 patients given rapid endoscopic treatment, in-hospital mortality seems to be related to the contemporaneous presence of bleeding and non-bleeding lesions in more than one segment of the esophagogastroduodenal tract and the number of blood units transfused during the first 48 h of hospitalization.
Collapse
|