Characterization of Gut Microbiome Composition in Patients with Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Treated with Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy

INTRODUCTION

Patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) achieving a pathological complete response (pCR) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy have a better event-free survival. The role of gut microbiome in early TNBC is underexplored.

METHODS

Microbiome was analyzed by 16SrRNA sequencing.

RESULTS

Twenty-five patients with TNBC treated with neoadjuvant anthracycline/taxane-based chemotherapy were included. Fifty-six percent achieved a pCR. Fecal samples were collected before (t0), at 1 (t1), and 8 weeks (t2) from chemotherapy. Overall, 68/75 samples (90.7%) were suitable for microbiome analysis. At t0, pCR group showed a significantly higher α-diversity as compared with no-pCR, (P = .049). The PERMANOVA test on β-diversity highlighted a significant difference in terms of BMI (P = 0.039). Among patients with available matched samples at t0 and t1, no significant variation in microbiome composition was reported over time.

CONCLUSIONS

Fecal microbiome analysis in early TNBC is feasible and deserves further investigation in order to unravel its complex correlation with immunity and cancer.

Abstract P4-02-13: Homologous recombination deficiency, RB-loss gene signatures, intrinsic subtype and response to neoadjuvant treatment in HR+/HER2- early breast cancer: a correlative analysis of two phase II trials

Background: Hormone-receptor (HR)+/HER2- breast cancer (BC) is a biologically heterogeneous disease. Homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) and BRCA mutations have been previously reported to be associated with worse outcomes in HR+/HER2- metastatic BC patients receiving CDK4/6 inhibitors and endocrine therapy. Here, we assess the relation between HRD and RB-loss signatures, intrinsic subtyping, the PAM50-based chemo-endocrine score, and response to chemotherapy-based therapy and endocrine treatment in HR+/HER2- early BC. Methods: GIADA is a multicentric neoadjuvant phase II trial that treated premenopausal patients with Luminal B (LumB)-like BC (HR-positive, HER2-negative, with Ki67>20% and/or histologic Grade 3) with a combination of chemotherapy, immunotherapy and endocrine treatment. Expression of 758 genes on baseline tumor samples from all 43 patients was quantified by nCounter platform. The LETLOB phase II trial randomized postmenopausal women with clinical stage II-IIIA HR+/HER2- BC to neoadjuvant letrozole + lapatinib or letrozole + placebo for 6 months (Guarneri, JCO 2014). Gene-expression data (Affymetrix platform) from pre-treatment frozen core-biopsies was available from 66 out of 92 pts enrolled. Intrinsic subtype was assigned using a research-based PAM50 subtype predictor. A published HRD signature (Peng, Nat Commun 2014) and a signature of RB loss (RBsig), previously reported to potentially predict resistance to CDK4/6 inhibitors in HR+/HER2- BC (Malorni, Oncotarget 2016) were computed. The PAM50 based chemo-endocrine score (CES) was calculated using published definition (Prat, CCR 2017). Higher values of CES indicate increased endocrine sensitivity, while lower values indicate chemosensitivity. Association between genomic signatures was assessed through Pearson’s correlation coefficient. Association of genomic signatures with pCR was assessed through logistic regression and association with PEPI scores was assessed through Kruskal-Wallis test. Results: HRD signature levels were significantly higher in non-luminal (Basal-like and HER2-enriched) tumors as compared to Luminal (A or B) tumors (p>0.001 in the GIADA trial, p=0.021 in the LETLOB trial). Moreover, higher levels of HRD signature were associated with higher levels of RB-loss signature (Pearson correlation 0.355, p=0.020 in the GIADA trial; Pearson correlation 0.942, p< 0.001 in the LETLOB trial), higher levels of Basal-like signature (Pearson correlation 0.502, p< 0.001 in the GIADA trial; Pearson correlation 0.373, p=0.002 in the LETLOB trial) and lower levels of CES (Pearson correlation -0.422, p=0.005 in the GIADA trial; Pearson correlation -0.763, p< 0.001 in the LETLOB trial), indicative of higher chemosensitivity. In the GIADA trial, higher levels of HRD signature (p=0.018) and RBloss signature (p=0.073) and lower levels of CES (p=0.007) were associated with higher pCR rates after chemo, endocrine and immunotherapy. In the LETLOB trial, lower levels of HRD signature (p=0.068) and RBloss signature (p=0.042) and higher levels of CES (p=0.050) were associated with higher sensitivity to endocrine treatment (lower PEPI scores, 0 vs 1-3 vs 4 or more, after neoadjuvant letrozole). Conclusions: In HR+/HER2- early BC, HRD gene signatures, RB-loss gene signatures and non-luminal (especially Basal-like) intrinsic subtyping are associated with each other and associated with higher sensitivity to chemotherapy-based therapy and lower sensitivity to endocrine treatment. These observations might help correctly tailor systemic therapy, including biologic agents, in patients with HR+/HER2- early and advanced BC.

Citation Format: Gaia Griguolo, Federica Miglietta, Laia Paré, Daniele G. Generali, Antonio Frassoldati, Antonino Musolino, Simon Spazzapan, Grazia Vernaci, Tommaso Giarratano, Marcello Lo Mele, Giancarlo Bisagni, Federico Piacentini, Enrico Tagliafico, Katia Cagossi, Francesca Schiavi, Claudia Pinato, Aleix Prat, Valentina Guarneri, Maria Vittoria Dieci. Homologous recombination deficiency, RB-loss gene signatures, intrinsic subtype and response to neoadjuvant treatment in HR+/HER2- early breast cancer: a correlative analysis of two phase II trials [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-02-13.

Prognostic impact of extracranial disease control in HER2+ breast cancer-related brain metastases

BACKGROUND

Brain metastases (BM) are common among HER2+ breast cancer (BC) and prognostic stratification is crucial for optimal management. BC-GPA score and subsequent refinements (modified-GPA, updated-GPA) recapitulate prognostic factors. Since none of these indexes includes extracranial disease control, we evaluated its prognostic value in HER2+ BCBM.

METHODS

Patients diagnosed with HER2+ BCBM at Istituto Oncologico Veneto-Padova (2002-2021) and Montpellier Cancer Institute (2001-2015) were included as exploratory and validation cohorts, respectively. Extracranial disease control at BM diagnosis (no disease/stable disease/response vs. progressive disease) was evaluated.

RESULTS

In the exploratory cohort of 113 patients (median OS 12.2 months), extracranial control (n = 65, 57.5%) was significantly associated with better OS at univariate (median OS 17.7 vs. 8.7 months, p = 0.005) and multivariate analysis after adjustment for BC-GPA (HR 0.61, 95% CI 0.39-0.94), modified-GPA (HR 0.64, 95% CI 0.42-0.98) and updated-GPA (HR 0.63, 95% CI 0.41-0.98). The prognostic impact of extracranial disease control (n = 66, 56.4%) was then confirmed in the validation cohort (n = 117) at univariate (median OS 20.2 vs. 9.1 months, p < 0.001) and multivariate analysis adjusting for BC-GPA (HR 0.41, 95% CI 0.27-0.61), modified-GPA (HR 0.44, 95% CI 0.29-0.67) and updated-GPA (HR 0.42, 95% CI 0.28-0.63).

CONCLUSIONS

Extracranial disease control provides independent prognostic information in HER2+ BCBM beyond commonly used prognostic scores.

HER2-low-positive breast cancer: evolution from primary tumor to residual disease after neoadjuvant treatment

Approximately a half of breast tumors classified as HER2-negative exhibit HER2-low-positive expression. We recently described a high instability of HER2-low-positive expression from primary breast cancer (BC) to relapse. Previous studies reporting discordance in HER2 status between baseline biopsy and residual disease (RD) in patients undergoing neoadjuvant treatment did not include the HER2-low-positive category. The aim of this study is to track the evolution of HER2-low-positive expression from primary BC to RD after neoadjuvant treatment. Patients undergoing neoadjuvant treatment with available baseline tumor tissue and matched samples of RD (in case of no pCR) were included. HER2-negative cases were sub-classified as HER2-0 or HER2-low-positive (IHC 1+ or 2+ and ISH negative). Four-hundred forty-six patients were included. Primary BC phenotype was: HR-positive/HER2-negative 23.5%, triple-negative (TN) 35%, HER2-positive 41.5%. HER2-low-positive cases were 55.6% of the HER2-negative cohort and were significantly enriched in the HR-positive/HER2-negative vs. TN subgroup (68.6% vs. 46.8%, p = 0.001 χ2 test). In all, 35.3% of non-pCR patients (n = 291) had a HER2-low-positive expression on RD. The overall rate of HER2 expression discordance was 26.4%, mostly driven by HER2-negative cases converting either from (14.8%) or to (8.9%) HER2-low-positive phenotype. Among HR-positive/HER2-negative patients with HER2-low-positive expression on RD, 32.0% and 57.1% had an estimated high risk of relapse according to the residual proliferative cancer burden and CPS-EG score, respectively. In conclusion, HER2-low-positive expression showed high instability from primary BC to RD after neoadjuvant treatment. HER2-low-positive expression on RD may guide personalized adjuvant treatment for high-risk patients in the context of clinical trials with novel anti-HER2 antibody-drug conjugates.

Gene-expression signatures to inform neoadjuvant treatment decision in HR+/HER2- breast cancer: Available evidence and clinical implications

Over the last few years, the indication for chemotherapy use in HR+/HER2- early BC has been significantly modified by the introduction of gene-expression profiling. In the adjuvant setting, several gene-expression signatures have been validated to discriminate early stage HR+/HER2- BC with different prognosis and to identify patients for which adjuvant chemotherapy can be spared. Considering their ability to optimize the choice of adjuvant treatment and the increasing use of neoadjuvant approach in early BC, the potential use of gene-expression signatures to discriminate patients to be candidate to neoadjuvant chemotherapy or endocrine treatment appears particularly appealing. Indeed, the San Gallen Consensus Conference panel recently endorsed the use of genomic assays on core biopsies as a potential strategy for choosing the type of neoadjuvant treatment (chemotherapy or endocrine therapy) in selected patients. In this context, we here review evidence supporting the use of most common commercially available gene-expression signatures (Oncotype DX, MammaPrint, PAM50, EndoPredict and Breast Cancer Index) in patients receiving neoadjuvant therapy for HR+/HER2- BC. Data on the association of gene expression signatures and response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy or neoadjuvant endocrine therapy will be reviewed and the clinical implications of this data to guide the clinical decision-making process in early HR+/HER2- BC will be discussed.

Impact of estrogen receptor levels on outcome in non-metastatic triple negative breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant/adjuvant chemotherapy

Although 1% is the recommended cut-off to define estrogen receptor (ER) positivity, a 10% cut-off is often used in clinical practice for therapeutic purposes. We here evaluate clinical outcomes according to ER levels in a monoinstitutional cohort of non-metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (BC) patients undergoing (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy. Clinicopathological data of 406 patients with ER < 10% HER2-negative BC treated with (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy between 01/2000 and 04/2019 were collected. Patients were categorized in ER-negative (ER < 1%; N = 364) and ER-low positive (1-9%, N = 42). At a median follow-up of 54 months, 88 patients had relapsed and 64 died. No significant difference was observed in invasive relapse-free survival (iRFS) and overall survival (OS) according to ER expression levels, both at univariate and multivariate analysis (5-years iRFS 74.0% versus 73.1% for ER-negative and ER-low positive BC, respectively, p = 0.6; 5-years OS 82.3% versus 76.7% for ER-negative and ER-low positive BC, respectively, p = 0.8). Among the 165 patients that received neoadjuvant chemotherapy, pathological complete response rate was similar in the two cohorts (38% in ER-negative, 44% in ER-low positive, p = 0.498). In conclusion, primary BC with ER1-9% shows similar clinical behavior to ER 1% BC. Our results suggest the use of a 10% cut-off, rather than <1%, to define triple-negative BC.

ESR1 Gene Mutation in Hormone Receptor-Positive HER2-Negative Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients: Concordance Between Tumor Tissue and Circulating Tumor DNA Analysis

Endocrine therapy represents the cornerstone of treatment in hormone receptor-positive (HR+), HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer (mBC). The natural course of this disease is marked by endocrine resistance, mainly due to Estrogen Receptor 1 (ESR1) acquired mutations. The aim of this study is to evaluate the concordance between ESR1 status in metastatic tumor specimens and matched circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA). Forty-three patients with HR+, HER2-negative mBC underwent both a metastatic tumor biopsy and a liquid biopsy at the time of disease progression. DNA extracted from formalin fixed paraffin embedded (FFPE) tumor specimens and ctDNA from matched plasma were analyzed by droplet digital (dd)PCR for the main ESR1 mutations (Y537S, Y537C, Y537N, D538G, E380Q). We observed a total mutation rate of 21%. We found six mutations on tissue biopsy: Y537S (1), D538G (2), Y537N (1), E380Q (2). Three patients with no mutations in tumor tissue had mutations detected in ctDNA. The total concordance rate between ESR1 status on tumor tissue and plasma was 91%. Our results confirm the potential role of liquid biopsy as a non-invasive alternative to tissue biopsy for ESR1 mutation assessment in mBC patients.

Validation of Residual Proliferative Cancer Burden as a Predictor of Long-Term Outcome Following Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients with Hormone Receptor-Positive/Human Epidermal Growth Receptor 2-Negative Breast Cancer

Background

The integration of residual cancer burden (RCB) and post‐treatment Ki67 as residual proliferative cancer burden (RPCB) has been proposed as a stronger predictor of long‐term outcome in unselected patients with breast cancer (BC) undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT), as compared with RCB. However, no specific analysis in hormone‐receptor‐positive (HR+) human epidermal growth receptor 2‐negative (HER2−) BC is available so far.

Materials and Methods

A cohort of 130 patients with HR+/HER2− BC who underwent NACT between 2000 and 2014 was included. Archival surgical specimens were evaluated for RCB. RPCB was calculated by combining RCB and Ki67 as previously described. Patients were categorized in four RCB and RPCB categories (pathological complete response and tertiles). Disease‐free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) estimates were determined by Kaplan‐Meier analysis and compared using the log‐rank test. Overall change of χ² and c‐indexes were used to compare the performance of the prognostic models.

Results

RPCB was calculated for 85 patients. After a median follow up of 8.5 years, RCB was associated with OS (p = .048) but not with DFS (p = .152); RPCB was instead significantly associated with both DFS and OS (p = .034 and p < .001, respectively). In terms of OS, RPCB provided a significant amount of prognostic information beyond RCB (∆χ² 5.73, p < .001). In addition, c‐index for OS prediction was significantly higher for RPCB as compared with RCB (0.79 vs. 0.61, p = .03).

Conclusion

This is the first study evaluating RPCB in patients with HR+/HER2− BC treated with NACT. In this independent cohort, RPCB was a strong predictor of DFS and OS. The better performance of RPCB versus RCB was in part due to the ability of RPCB to discriminate a subgroup of patients with a particularly worse prognosis after NACT, who may be candidates for clinical trials evaluating novel adjuvant strategies.

Implications for Practice

The present work validated residual proliferative cancer burden (RPCB) as a strong predictor of long‐term outcome in patients with hormone receptor‐positive human epidermal growth receptor 2‐negative (HR+/HER2−) breast cancer (BC) treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. In addition, results from the present study suggest RPCB as a promising tool to identify patients with HR+/HER2− BC who might potentially benefit from the inclusion in clinical trials evaluating novel or escalated postneoadjuvant treatment strategies because it allowed to discriminate a subgroup of patients with particularly poor prognosis despite having received subsequent endocrine therapy in the adjuvant setting.

This article reports on the prognostic value of the Residual Proliferative Cancer Burden index in a cohort of patients with HR‐positive HER2‐negative breast cancer undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Use of scalp cooling device to prevent alopecia for early breast cancer patients receiving chemotherapy: A prospective study

Chemotherapy-induced alopecia (CIA) affects the majority of patients receiving chemotherapy (CT) for early breast cancer. It is a highly distressing side effect of CT, with psychological and social impact. Primary aim of the present analysis was to assess the efficacy of scalp cooling with DigniCap® in preventing CIA. Success rate was defined as patients' self-reported hair loss <50% according to Dean scale. In this analysis, we reported success rate at 3 weeks after the first CT course and at 3 weeks after the last CT course. Secondary endpoints included self-reported tolerability and patients' judgment on scalp cooling performance. Consecutive early breast cancer patients admitted to Istituto Oncologico Veneto who were recommended to receive neoadjuvant or adjuvant CT, were eligible to undergo scalp cooling during the CT administration within this study. 135 patients were included: 74% received adjuvant CT and 26% neoadjuvant CT (P < .001). The type of CT was: docetaxel-cyclophosphamide (26%), paclitaxel (23%), epirubicin-cyclophosphamide followed by paclitaxel (32%), and paclitaxel followed by epirubicincyclophosphamide (19%). The rate of success in preventing alopecia was 77% (104/135) at 3 weeks from the start of CT and 60% (81/135) at 3 weeks from the end of treatment. Higher success rates were reported in non-anthracycline (71%) compared to anthracycline-containing CT regimens (54%; P < 0.001). Premature discontinuation of scalp cooling was reported in 29/135 patients (21.5%), including withdrawal for alopecia (16/29), for low scalp cooling tolerability (8/29) or both (5/29). Scalp cooling was generally well tolerated. These results overall suggest that the use of scalp cooling is effective in preventing alopecia in the majority of early breast cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant or adjuvant CT, especially for patients undergoing a taxane-based non-anthracycline regimen.

Androgen Receptor Expression and Association With Distant Disease-Free Survival in Triple Negative Breast Cancer: Analysis of 263 Patients Treated With Standard Therapy for Stage I-III Disease

Background: We evaluated immunohistochemical AR expression and correlation with prognosis in a large series of homogeneously treated patients with primary TNBC.

Material and Methods: Patients diagnosed with stage I-III TNBC between 2000 and 2015 at Istituto Oncologico Veneto who received treatment with surgery and neoadjuvant and/or adjuvant chemotherapy were included. Whole tissue slides were stained for AR. AR-positive expression was defined as >1% of positively stained tumor cells. Distant-disease-free survival (DDFS) was calculated from diagnosis to distant relapse or death. Late-DDFS was calculated from the landmark of 3 years after diagnosis until distant relapse or death.

Results: We included 263 primary TNBC patients. Mean AR expression was 14% (range 0–100%), and 29.7% (n = 78) of patients were AR+. AR+ vs. AR- cases presented more frequently older age (p < 0.001), non-ductal histology (p < 0.001), G1-G2 (p = 0.003), lower Ki67 (p < 0.001) and lower TILs (p = 0.008). At a median follow up of 81 months, 23.6% of patients experienced a DDFS event: 33.3% of AR+ and 19.5% of AR- patients (p = 0.015). 5 years DDFS rates were 67.2% and 80.6% for AR+ and AR- patients (HR = 1.82 95%CI 1.10–3.02, p = 0.020). AR maintained an independent prognostic role beyond stage, but when TILs were added to the model only stage and TILs were independent prognostic factors. AR was the only factor significantly associated with late-DDFS: 16.4% of AR+ and 3.4% of AR- patients experienced a DDFS after the landmark of 3 years after diagnosis (p = 0.001). Late-DDFS rates at 5 years from the 3-year landmark were 75.8% for AR+ and 95.2% for AR- patients (log-rank p < 0.001; HR = 5.67, 95%CI 1.90–16.94, p = 0.002).

Conclusions: AR expression is associated with worse outcome for patients with TNBC. In particular, AR+ TNBC patients are at increased risk of late DDFS events. These results reinforce the rationale of AR targeting in AR+ TNBC.

Abstract P6-18-24: Lapatinib-based therapies after pertuzumab and/or T-DM1 for HER2+ metastatic breast cancer patients

Background:

Trastuzumab + pertuzumab + taxane and ado-trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) are standard first and second-line therapies for HER2+ metastatic breast cancer. Lapatinib is approved in combination with capecitabine in trastuzumab-resistant patients and in combination with letrozole in hormone receptor positive HER2+ pts for whom endocrine treatment is indicated. In Italy, L is also approved in combination with trastuzumab for hormone receptor-negative HER2+ pts. There are only few data on the activity of lapatinib in pts who received prior pertuzumab and /or T-DM1.

Methods: We retrospectively analysed HER2+ metastatic breast cancer pts who received lapatinib after prior pertuzumab and/or T-DM1 from July 2013 to June 2018. Objective response rate (ORR) was assessed according to RECIST 1.1. Progression-free survival (PFS) was calculated from lapatinib-based therapy starting to disease progression (PD) or last follow-up. Overall Survival (OS) was calculated from lapatinib-based therapy starting to death or last follow up.

Results: Data from 32 HER2+ mBC treated with lapatinib-based therapy were recorded: 30 pts (94%) received lapatinib combined with capecitabine, 1 pt received lapatinib combined with letrozole and 1 pt received lapatinib combined with trastuzumab. All patients had been treated with prior T-DM1 and 9 (28%) with prior pertuzumab for metastatic breast cancer. Setting of treatment with lapatinib-based therapy was: 2° line (n=2, 6%), 3° line (n=17, 53%) and &gt;4° line (n=13, 41%).

Patients characteristics were as follows: median age 55 years (range 35-71), hormone receptor positive 66% (n=21), stage IV at diagnosis 34% (n=11), visceral involvement at lapatinib-based therapy starting 91% (n=29).

As of June 2018, lapatinib-based therapy was ongoing for 4 pts and 28 pts discontinued treatment due to disease progression (median number of courses for these pts was 8.5, range 2-27).

ORR in evaluable pts was: complete response (n=1, 3%), partial response (n=13, 41%), stable disease (n=9, 28%), disease progression (n=9, 28%). Median PFS was 6.4 months (95% CI 3.0-9.8). As of June 2018, 14 pts (44%) were alive, median OS was 11.8 months (95% CI 9.9-13.6).

Conclusion: These results confirm that lapatinib-based therapy retains clinical efficacy in HER2+ metastatic breast cancer pts treated with prior pertuzumab and/or T-DM1 and represents a valid therapeutic option in this setting.

Citation Format: Frezzini S, Giarratano T, Dieci MV, Giorgi CA, Griguolo G, Vernaci G, Menichetti A, Mantiero M, Tasca G, Faggioni G, Falci C, Miglietta F, Mioranza E, Angelini S, Ghiotto C, Conte P, Guarneri V. Lapatinib-based therapies after pertuzumab and/or T-DM1 for HER2+ metastatic breast cancer patients [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P6-18-24.

Patterns of Fertility Preservation and Pregnancy Outcome After Breast Cancer at a Large Comprehensive Cancer Center

Background: In the last decades, long-term outcomes of breast cancer (BC) patients have improved, raising new survivorship issues, including fertility preservation and safety of pregnancy after BC. This study assesses evolution in patterns of fertility discussion/preservation over time and reports pregnancy outcomes in a cohort of young BC patients.

Methods: A retrospective cohort of 590 BC patients aged ≤40 diagnosed between 2000 and 2016 at a large cancer center was identified. Fertility counseling and preservation patterns for patients receiving chemotherapy were analyzed and compared for two cohorts: 2004–2006 and 2014–2016 (total n = 161). Outcomes were reported for patients with documented pregnancy after BC.

Results: Significantly, more patients diagnosed in 2014–2016 had evidence of discussion on fertility issues and/or application of fertility preservation techniques versus patients diagnosed in 2004–2006 (82.9% vs. 66.0%, p = 0.017). In particular, there was a significant difference in rate of documented fertility issues discussion (67.6% vs. 34.0%, p < 0.001). Age >35 and parity were associated with lower rates of fertility discussion/preservation. However, rates significantly improved over time (77.6% in 2014–2016 vs. 58.1% in 2004–2006 for patients aged >35, p = 0.046; 80.7% in 2014–2016 vs. 57.6% in 2004–2006 for patients with children at diagnosis, p = 0.018). Twenty-six patients with pregnancy after BC were identified; eight delivered at the age of >40. No complications for women or newborns were reported. Only two patients experienced BC relapse.

Conclusions: In this small retrospective cohort, no safety concerns were identified for pregnancy after BC. The importance attributed by clinicians to address fertility issues has increased over time.