Quantitative impact of the first COVID-19 lockdown on nuclear medicine in France: the CORALINE study

PURPOSE

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic reshaped the usual risk: benefit equilibrium that became a trade-off between the infection exposure risk for the patient (and for staff) and the risk associated with delaying or cancelling the nuclear medicine examination. This study aimed at quantifying the impact of the first COVID-19 lockdown in France on nuclear medicine examination volume together with volume of examination cancellation and non-attendance.

METHODS

We retrospectively assessed the volume of planned examinations from 1 month before to 1 month after the first lockdown in French high-volume nuclear medicine departments (NMD) sharing the same information management system including both university hospitals, UH (n = 7), and cancer centres, CC (n = 2).

RESULTS

The study enrolled 31,628 consecutive patients referred for a nuclear medicine examination performed or not (NMEP or NMEnP). The total volume of NMEP significantly dropped by 43.4% between the 4 weeks before and after the starting of the lockdown. The comparison of the percentage of NMEP and NMEnP between UH and CC is significantly different (p < 0.001). The percentage of NMEP during the study was 67.9% in UH vs 84.7% in CC. Percentages of NMEnP in UH and CC were due respectively to cancellation by the patient (14.9 vs 7.4%), cancellation by the NMD (9.5 vs 3.4%), cancellation by the referring physician (5.1 vs 4.4%) and non-attender patients (2.7 vs 0.2%).

CONCLUSION

The study underlines the public health issue caused by COVID-19 above the pandemic itself and should be useful in preparing for potential resource utilisation and staffing requirements.

Simplified Quantification Method for In Vivo SPECT Imaging of the Vesicular Acetylcholine Transporter with 123I-Iodobenzovesamicol

(123)I-iodobenzovesamicol is a SPECT radioligand selective for the vesicular acetylcholine transporter (VAChT) and used to assess the integrity of cholinergic pathways in various neurologic disorders. The current noninvasive method for quantitative analysis of (123)I-iodobenzovesamicol, based on multilinear reference tissue model 2 (MRTM2), requires repeated scans for several hours, limiting its application in clinical trials. Our objective was to validate a simplified acquisition method based on a single (123)I-iodobenzovesamicol static scan preserving the quantification accuracy. Three acquisition times were tested comparatively to a kinetic analysis using MRTM2.

METHODS

Six healthy volunteers underwent a dynamic SPECT acquisition comprising 14 frames over 28 h and an MR imaging scan. MR images were automatically segmented, providing the volumes of 19 regions of interest (ROIs). SPECT datasets were coregistered with MR images, and regional time-activity curves were derived. For each ROI, a complete MRTM2 pharmacokinetic analysis, using the cerebellar hemispheres as the reference region, led to the calculation of a (123)I-iodobenzovesamicol-to-VAChT binding parameter, the nondisplaceable binding potential (BP(ND-MRTM2)). A simplified analysis was also performed at 5, 8, and 28 h after injection, providing a simplified BP(ND), given as BP(ND-t) = C(ROI) - C(cerebellar hemispheres)/C(cerebellar hemispheres), with C being the averaged radioactive concentration.

RESULTS

No significant difference was found among BP(ND-5 h), BP(ND-8 h), and BP(ND-MRTM2) in any of the extrastriatal regions explored. BP(ND-28 h) was significantly higher than BP(ND-5 h), BP(ND-8 h), and BP(ND-MRTM2) in 9 of the 17 regions explored (P < 0.05). BP(ND-5 h), BP(ND-8 h), and BP(ND-28 h) correlated significantly with BP(ND-MRTM2) (P < 0.05; ρ = 0.99, 0.98, and 0.92, respectively). In the striatum, BP(ND-28 h) was significantly higher than BP(ND-5 h) and BP(ND-8 h). BP(ND-5 h) differed significantly from BP(ND-MRTM2) (P < 0.05), with BP(ND-5 h) being 43.6% lower.

CONCLUSION

In the extrastriatal regions, a single acquisition at 5 or 8 h after injection provides quantitative results similar to a pharmacokinetic analysis. However, with the highest correlation and accuracy, 5 h is the most suitable time to perform an accurate (123)I-iodobenzovesamicol quantification. In the striatum, none of the 3 times has led to an accurate quantification.

Kidney intragraft donor-specific antibodies as determinant of antibody-mediated lesions and poor graft outcome

Allograft pathology, antibody-tissue interaction as demonstrated by C4d deposition and serological evidence of donor-specific antibodies (DSA) are the cardinal diagnostic features of antibody-mediated lesions (AML) in kidney transplantation. However, discrepancy between histological and serological findings is common, and more reliable diagnostic tools are called for. Here, we asked whether the in situ detection of DSA could serve as marker for AML. To that end, we applied the anti-HLA single antigen flow bead assay to eluates from 51 needle core graft biopsies performed for cause. Intragraft antibody profiles were correlated to serum DSA (sDSA), histological data and transplant outcome. The prevalence and the mean number of intragraft DSA (gDSA) were lower than that of sDSA (15/51 gDSA+ vs. 37/51 sDSA+ patients; 1.64 gDSA vs. 2.24 sDSA per patient). DSA were detected in all anti-HLA antibody-positive biopsies (15/15). The presence of gDSA was significantly associated with (1) microcirculation lesions taken individually (g, cg) and analyzed in functional clusters (ptc + g + cg > 0, cg + mm > 0), (2) C4d positivity and (3) a worse short-term transplant outcome (p = 0.05). These associations were not found for patients presenting only sDSA. Taken together, these results indicate that gDSA is a severity marker of antibody-mediated pathogenic process.