Race, Ethnicity, and Ancestry in Clinical Pathways: A Framework for Evaluation

Clinical algorithms, or "pathways," promote the delivery of medical care that is consistent and equitable. Race, ethnicity, and/or ancestry terms are sometimes included in these types of guidelines, but it is unclear if this is appropriate for clinical decision-making. At our institution, we developed and applied a structured framework to determine whether race, ethnicity, or ancestry terms identified in our clinical pathways library should be retained, modified, or removed. First, we reviewed all text and associated reference documents for 132 institutionally-developed clinical pathways and identified 8 pathways that included race, ethnicity, or ancestry terms. Five pathways had clear evidence or a change in institutional policy that supported removal of the term. Multispecialty teams conducted additional in-depth evaluation of the 3 remaining pathways (Acute Viral Illness, Hyperbilirubinemia, and Weight Management) by applying the framework. In total, based on these reviews, race, ethnicity, or ancestry terms were removed (n = 6) or modified (n = 2) in all 8 pathways. Application of the framework established several recommended practices, including: (1) define race, ethnicity, and ancestry rigorously; (2) assess the most likely mechanisms underlying epidemiologic associations; (3) consider whether inclusion of the term is likely to mitigate or exacerbate existing inequities; and (4) exercise caution when applying population-level data to individual patient encounters. This process and framework may be useful to other institutional programs and national organizations in evaluating the inclusion of race, ethnicity, and ancestry in clinical guidelines.

Accuracy of identifying pediatric acute bacterial sinusitis diagnoses in outpatient claims data

PURPOSE

Acute bacterial sinusitis is among the most frequent outpatient infections in children and adolescents and is well suited to study in large healthcare utilization databases, but the validity of International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision (ICD-10) codes together with antibiotic prescriptions to identify cases of acute bacterial sinusitis has not been established. We aimed to evaluate the validity of ICD-10 codes combined with antibiotic prescriptions to identify new diagnoses of acute bacterial sinusitis among pediatric patients evaluated in the outpatient setting.

METHODS

Children and adolescents aged 17 years and younger with an outpatient diagnosis of acute sinusitis along with an antibiotic prescription from an ambulatory facility affiliated with the Mass General Brigham health system were identified via a clinical data warehouse. Patients were stratified by age (0-5 years, 6-11 years, and 12-17 years), and 50 cases per age group were randomly sampled. Medical records were independently reviewed by two pediatric infectious diseases physicians to assess for the documentation of a clinician-defined diagnosis of acute bacterial sinusitis. Positive predictive values (PPVs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated.

RESULTS

A total of 150 patients were included in the final cohort. Frontal, maxillary, and "unspecified" sinuses accounted for 88% of the diagnoses. The positive predictive value of the algorithm to identify clinician-defined diagnoses of acute bacterial sinusitis was 92% (95% CI 87%, 95%). The PPVs were consistent across age strata.

CONCLUSIONS

ICD-10 codes for acute sinusitis, when paired with a same-day antibiotic prescription, have a high positive predictive value among a cohort of pediatric patients, suggesting that they can be used to study new acute bacterial sinusitis diagnoses with claims.

1126. Short-Course Therapy and Transition to Enteral Antibiotics for Uncomplicated Bacteremia Due to Enterobacterales Species

Background

Gram-negative bacteremia historically has been treated with 10-14 days of parenteral antibiotics. However, data supporting this practice are lacking, and recent evidence shows equivalent outcomes for short-course (SC) therapy (7 days) and early (by day 5) conversion to highly bioavailable enteral (PO) antibiotics for Enterobacterales bacteremia.

Methods

Under a QI framework, we used PDSA cycles to reduce treatment duration and increase use of PO levofloxacin or trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole for uncomplicated Enterobacterales bacteremia among Infectious Diseases (ID) clinicians at a children’s hospital in Boston, MA. We conducted an education session on evidence to support these practices for ID faculty and fellows in October 2020. In December 2020, we implemented standardized recommendations for a 7-day duration and early PO transition for eligible patients (≥ 3-months-old, ≤ 2 days monomicrobial bacteremia, with source control and return to baseline clinical status) that could be inserted automatically into electronic consult notes. In February 2021, we reinforced this practice to ID providers. We collected data before and after these interventions on ID recommendations and on patients’ actual antibiotic management.

Results

From 11/01/20 to 05/31/21, mean recommended treatment decreased from 10.6 to 9.5 days; however, mean duration received was similar (11.2 vs 11.7 days) (Figure 1). The percentage of patients for whom ID recommended PO conversion and in whom transition to PO agents by day 5 occurred increased from 27% to 37.5%.

Conclusion

Education and creation of automated standardized recommendations led to decreased recommended treatment durations and increased PO conversions for Enterobacterales bacteremia, but only modestly. This quality improvement initiative demonstrates the potential benefits of education and electronic documentation tools to facilitate evidence-based practice changes, but also highlights the difficulty in changing practice even amongst ID clinicians. Further PDSA cycles will be targeted at increasing more consistent awareness among a large ID division in addition to other stakeholders.

Disclosures

Gabriella S. Lamb, MD, MPH, Nothing to disclose

Correlation of SARS-CoV-2 Nucleocapsid Antigen and RNA Concentrations in Nasopharyngeal Samples from Children and Adults Using an Ultrasensitive and Quantitative Antigen Assay

Diagnosis of COVID-19 by PCR offers high sensitivity, but the utility of detecting samples with high cycle threshold (CT ) values remains controversial. Currently available rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) for SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid antigens (Ag) have sensitivity well below PCR. The correlation of Ag and RNA quantities in clinical nasopharyngeal (NP) samples is unknown. An ultrasensitive, quantitative electrochemiluminescence immunoassay for SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid (the MSD S-PLEX SARS-CoV-2 N assay) was used to measure Ag in clinical NP samples from adults and children previously tested by PCR. The S-PLEX Ag assay had a limit of detection (LOD) of 0.16 pg/ml and a cutoff of 0.32 pg/ml. Ag concentrations measured in clinical NP samples (collected in 3.0 ml of media) ranged from less than 160 fg/ml to 2.7 μg/ml. Log-transformed Ag concentrations correlated tightly with CT values. In 35 adult and 101 pediatric PCR-positive samples, the sensitivities were 91% (95% confidence interval, 77 to 98%) and 79% (70 to 87%), respectively. In samples with a CT of ≤35, the sensitivities were 100% (88 to 100%) and 96% (88 to 99%), respectively. In 50 adult and 40 pediatric PCR-negative specimens, the specificities were 100% (93 to 100%) and 98% (87 to 100%), respectively. Nucleocapsid concentrations in clinical NP samples span 8 orders of magnitude and correlate closely with RNA concentrations (CT values). The S-PLEX Ag assay showed 96 to 100% sensitivity in samples from children and adults with CT values of ≤35, and a specificity of 98 to 100%. These results clarify Ag concentration distributions in clinical samples, providing insight into the performance of Ag RDTs and offering a new approach to diagnosis of COVID-19.

Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Infection in Febrile Neonates

Most severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infections in pediatric patients are mild or asymptomatic. However, infants have emerged at higher risk of hospitalization and severe outcomes in pediatric coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). We report a case series of 4 full-term neonates hospitalized with fever and found to have SARS-CoV-2 infection with a spectrum of illness severities. Two neonates required admission to the intensive care unit for respiratory insufficiency and end organ involvement. Half of the patients were found to have a coinfection. One neonate received antiviral therapy with remdesivir and is, to our knowledge, the youngest patient to receive this drug for COVID-19. All neonates had favorable outcomes.