Eribulin Treatment for Patients with Metastatic Breast Cancer: The UK Experience - A Multicenter Retrospective Study

INTRODUCTION

This study examined real-world data from patients who received eribulin for metastatic breast cancer (MBC) collected from 14 hospitals across the UK.

METHODS

Anonymized data were collected retrospectively from patients with MBC who had received eribulin. The data included the hormone-receptor status, histological diagnosis, age, prior chemotherapy, response to eribulin, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

Among 577 patients analyzed, the median age was 56 years, and most patients (73%) were estrogen-receptor positive. The median OS was 288 days (95% confidence interval [CI]: 261-315), and the PFS was 117 days (95% CI: 105-129). The median OS was higher among older patients (≥65 vs. <65 years: 325 days [95% CI: 264-385] vs. 285 days [95% CI: 252-317]; p = 0.028). The median OS was also higher in patients who received eribulin after fewer prior lines of chemotherapy (≤2 vs. >2 prior: 328 days [95% CI: 264-385] vs. 264 days [95% CI: 229-298]; p = 0.042).

DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION

These retrospective data suggest that eribulin can be successfully used in older patients with MBC. Eribulin treatment was more effective in earlier-line settings, which, while predictable, supports consideration of eribulin as a second-line treatment option.

Eribulin for the treatment of advanced breast cancer: A prospective observational registry study

OBJECTIVE

Eribulin treatment improved overall survival with predictable toxicities in phase 3 trials of patients with previously treated, locally advanced/metastatic breast cancer. This study (NCT02443428) prospectively observed eribulin-treated patients in real-world clinical practice.

METHODS

This observational multicentre registry study enrolled 76 patients with locally advanced/metastatic breast cancer who had ≤2 prior chemotherapeutic regimens for advanced disease. Eribulin was administered at a 1.23 mg/m² dose (days 1 and 8 of every 21-day cycle). Adverse events (AEs) were monitored and effectiveness was assessed per local practice.

RESULTS

AEs occurred in 98.7% of patients; 88.2% had eribulin-related AEs. The most common AEs were fatigue (64.5%), alopecia (36.8%), nausea (35.5%) and constipation (30.3%). Serious AEs occurred in 42.1% of patients. The most common grade 3/4 AEs were neutropenia (9.2%), febrile neutropenia (9.2%), dyspnoea (5.3%) and pleural effusion (5.3%). No fatal AEs occurred. Dose reductions occurred in 31.6% of patients, 42.1% experienced dose delays and 9.2% discontinued due to worsening condition. There were complete responses in 2.6% and partial responses in 15.8% of patients. Median time to progression and overall survival were 4.0 and 8.3 months, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Eribulin was well tolerated in real-world clinical practice, comparable to safety and effectiveness reported in other clinical trials.

The Impact of COVID-19 on the Delivery of Systemic Anti-Cancer Treatment at Guy's Cancer Centre

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to assess the outcome of cancer patients undergoing systemic anti-cancer treatment (SACT) at our centre to help inform future clinical decision-making around SACT during the COVID-19 pandemic.

METHODS

Patients receiving at least one episode of SACT for solid tumours at Guy's Cancer Centre between 1 March and 31 May 2020 and the same period in 2019 were included in the study. Data were collected on demographics, tumour type/stage, treatment type (chemotherapy, immunotherapy, biological-targeted) and SARS-CoV2 infection.

RESULTS

A total of 2120 patients received SACT in 2020, compared to 2449 in 2019 (13% decrease). From 2019 to 2020, there was an increase in stage IV disease (62% vs. 72%), decrease in chemotherapy (42% vs. 34%), increase in immunotherapy (6% vs. 10%), but similar rates of biologically targeted treatments (37% vs. 38%). There was a significant increase in 1st and 2nd line treatments in 2020 (68% vs. 81%; p < 0.0001) and reduction in 3rd and subsequent lines (26% vs. 15%; p = 0.004) compared to 2019. Of the 2020 cohort, 2% patients developed SARS-CoV2 infections.

CONCLUSIONS

These real-world data from a tertiary Cancer Centre suggest that despite the challenges faced due to the COVID-19 pandemic, SACT was able to be continued without any significant effects on the mortality of solid-tumour patients. There was a low rate (2%) of SARS-CoV-2 infection which is comparable to the 1.4%-point prevalence in our total cancer population.

Abstract PS8-22: Augmentation of a minimal multidisciplinary tumor board with clinical decision support to triage breast cancer patients in the UK

BackgroundAll UK cancer patients undergo required assessments by a full Multidisciplinary Tumor Board (fMTB) at key treatment decision points, placing a resource burden on the healthcare system. Watson for Oncology (WfO) is a decision-support system that presents therapeutic options to cancer-treating clinicians. This study is an initial phase of an evaluation at Guys and St. Thomas’ NHS Hospital (GSTT), designed to explore the extent to which WfO can be used by the fMTB to triage less complex patient cases and ultimately reduce workload and time pressures currently experienced by fMTBs. We conducted a concordance study with two minimal MTB teams (mMTB) for Stage I-III breast cancer patients.

MethodsBreast cancer cases (N=63) treated from 2017-2018 at GSTT were evaluated by 2 independent mMTBs, blinded to each other and previous fMTB decisions rendered prior to this study. Each mMTB consisted of a senior medical oncologist and surgeon; GSTT’s 12+ member fMTB is comprised of oncologists, surgeons, radiologists, pathologists and others. mMTBs were shown options that were either listed as ‘recommended’ or ‘for consideration’ by WfO and given the opportunity to revise prior decisions. The combined 4-person minimal MTB (cmMTB) consisting of both 2-person mMTBs provided a current consensus best-practice plan and systemic therapy recommendations for discordant cases. We evaluated the concordance of WfO’s systemic therapeutic recommendations and mMTBs, as well as concordance with the cmMTB. Previous decisions by the fMDTB were also compared to decisions by the cmMTB. Univariate logistic regression explored characteristics predictive of concordance with the cmMTB.

ResultsFor treatment plans, WFO’s therapeutic options had higher concordance with cmMTB decisions than either mMTB alone (concordance 93.7% vs. 92.1%) or the previous decisions by the fMTB (87.3). For systemic therapy decisions, the WfO-cmMDTB concordance was 70.2%; however, adjusting for non-NICE approved drugs and the common practice of Carboplatin use in the UK, concordance increased to 91.5%. Previous decisions by the fMTB had the lowest concordance with the cmMTB (87.3%). Adjusting for the UK-practice related use of Carboplatin, WfO had slightly higher concordance with cmMTB systemic therapy decisions than either mMTB alone (89.4% and 87.2%). Univariate analysis with this limited sample revealed non-significant trends in association between mMTB’s concordance with WfO and stage of cN at diagnosis, HER2 status, tumor location and grade. For example, mMTBs concordance with WfO tended to improve when tumor grade was high. Non-significant trends were also identified in the association between WfO-treatment concordance and tumor location, where treatment concordance increased with medial tumor location.

ConclusionIn this small cohort study, a clinical decision-support tool demonstrated better agreement with UK best practice treatment than a 2-person mMTB and may have a role in triaging breast cancer cases in the UK.

Citation Format: Hartmut Kristeleit, Martha Martin, Christina Karampera, Rezzan Hekmat, Bertha IntHout, Ashutosh Kothari, Majid Kazmi, Amanda Clery, Yanzhong Wang, Bolaji Coker, Winnie Felix, Anita Preininger, Suwei Wang, Roy Vergis, Tom Eggebraaten, Christopher Gloe, Irene Dankwa-Mullan, Gretchen Jackson, Anna Rigg, Danny Ruta. Augmentation of a minimal multidisciplinary tumor board with clinical decision support to triage breast cancer patients in the UK [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2020 San Antonio Breast Cancer Virtual Symposium; 2020 Dec 8-11; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS8-22.

Fulvestrant Plus Vistusertib vs Fulvestrant Plus Everolimus vs Fulvestrant Alone for Women With Hormone Receptor-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer: The MANTA Phase 2 Randomized Clinical Trial

Question

Does the addition of vistusertib increase progression-free survival and other measures of antitumor activity of fulvestrant in postmenopausal women with estrogen receptor–positive advanced or metastatic breast cancer that progressed after prior therapy with aromatase inhibitors?

Findings

This randomized clinical trial in 333 patients failed to demonstrate a benefit of vistusertib plus fulvestrant vs fulvestrant alone. In addition, the outcomes in both vistusertib groups were inferior to those in the group treated with fulvestrant plus everolimus.

Meaning

The results suggest that dual mammalian target of rapamycin inhibition with vistusertib at the maximal tolerated doses is inferior to mammalian target of rapamycin complex 1 inhibition with the rapamycin analogue everolimus.

Importance

Randomized clinical trials have demonstrated a substantial benefit of adding everolimus to endocrine therapy. Everolimus inhibits the mammalian target of rapamycin complex 1 (mTORC1) complex but not mTORC2, which can set off an activating feedback loop via mTORC2. Vistusertib, a dual inhibitor of mTORC1 and mTORC2, has demonstrated broad activity in preclinical breast cancer models, showing superior activity to everolimus.

Objective

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of vistusertib in combination with fulvestrant compared with fulvestrant alone or fulvestrant plus everolimus in postmenopausal women with estrogen receptor–positive advanced or metastatic breast cancer.

Design, Setting, and Participants

The MANTA trial is an open-label, phase 2 randomized clinical trial in which 333 patients with estrogen receptor–positive breast cancer progressing after prior aromatase inhibitor treatment underwent randomization (2:3:3:2) between April 1, 2014, and October 24, 2016, at 88 sites in 9 countries: 67 patients were assigned to receive fulvestrant, 103 fulvestrant plus vistusertib daily, 98 fulvestrant plus vistusertib intermittently, and 65 fulvestrant plus everolimus. Treatment was continued until disease progression, development of unacceptable toxic effects, or withdrawal of consent. Analysis was performed on an intention-to-treat basis.

Interventions

Fulvestrant alone or in combination with vistusertib (continuous or intermittent dosing schedules) or everolimus.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS).

Results

Among the 333 women in the study (median age, 63 years [range, 56-70 years]), median PFS was 5.4 months (95% CI, 3.5-9.2 months) with fulvestrant, 7.6 months (95% CI, 5.9-9.4 months) with fulvestrant plus daily vistusertib, 8.0 months (95% CI, 5.6-9.9 months) with fulvestrant plus intermittent vistusertib, and 12.3 months (95% CI, 7.7-15.7 months) with fulvestrant plus everolimus. There was no significant difference in PFS between those receiving fulvestrant plus daily or intermittent vistusertib and fulvestrant alone (hazard ratio, 0.88 [95% CI, 0.63-1.24]; P = .46; and hazard ratio, 0.79 [95% CI, 0.55-1.12]; P = .16).

Conclusions and Relevance

The combination of fulvestrant plus everolimus demonstrated significantly longer PFS compared with fulvestrant plus vistusertib or fulvestrant alone. The trial failed to demonstrate a benefit of adding the dual mTORC1 and mTORC2 inhibitor vistusertib to fulvestrant.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02216786 and EudraCT number: 2013-002403-34

Abstract 3888: Intracranial evaluation of the in vivo pharmacokinetics, brain distribution, and efficacy of rucaparib in BRCA-mutant, triple-negative breast cancer

Background: The poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor rucaparib is approved for use in recurrent ovarian cancer; however, there are limited data on the activity of rucaparib in patients with central nervous system (CNS) involvement. The goals of these studies were to evaluate the pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) of rucaparib and to correlate these results with the efficacy observed in a BRCA1-mutant xenograft model of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). In addition, a case report where rucaparib demonstrated clinical activity in the CNS of a patient with BRCA2-mutant breast cancer is presented.

Methods and Results: In a PK study in CD-1 mice, rucaparib demonstrated limited brain penetration after a single oral dose of 150 mg/kg, with a mean free brain-to-plasma AUC ratio (Kpuu, brain) of 0.09. The free brain Cmax of rucaparib was 8.59 ng/mL, which was comparable to its free cerebrospinal fluid Cmax (6.69 ng/mL) but significantly lower than the total Cmax measured in the brain (118 ng/mL). The antitumor efficacy of rucaparib was evaluated in orthotopic and intracranial tumor models using the BRCA1-mutant MDA-MB-436 TNBC cell line. In the orthotopic setting, rucaparib ≥50 mg/kg BID resulted in &gt;100% tumor growth inhibition (TGI) after 28 days of dosing. Higher levels of rucaparib were observed in the tumor relative to plasma at all doses evaluated. A PK-PD analysis showed an inverse correlation between poly(ADP-ribose) and rucaparib levels in the plasma and tumor, with decreased poly(ADP-ribose) levels correlating with greater TGI. To evaluate intracranial efficacy, a luciferase labelled MDA-MB-436 cell line was employed and tumor burden was evaluated by weekly bioluminescence measurements. Rucaparib 150 mg/kg BID demonstrated efficient suppression of tumor growth after 43 days of dosing, with &gt;100% TGI. In support of these preclinical findings, a patient with germline BRCA2-mutant metastatic breast cancer who had progressive CNS disease following whole brain radiation therapy was treated with rucaparib 600 mg PO BID for 9 months under a compassionate use program. A reduction of multiple metastatic brain lesions was observed based on MRI scans taken before and after rucaparib treatment. The patient also experienced complete resolution of neurological symptoms.

Conclusions: In vivo PK studies confirmed the limited brain penetration of rucaparib in a murine model with an intact blood-brain barrier. Nevertheless, antitumor efficacy was observed in a BRCA1-mutant intracranial TNBC mouse model, and clinical activity has been observed in a patient with germline BRCA2-mutant breast cancer and CNS involvement who was treated with rucaparib. Further studies are warranted to elucidate the activity of rucaparib in the brain.

Citation Format: Minh Nguyen, Liliane Robillard, Thomas C. Harding, Jim J. Xiao, Andrew D. Simmons, Hartmut Kristeleit, Michelle (Mingxiang) Liao. Intracranial evaluation of the in vivo pharmacokinetics, brain distribution, and efficacy of rucaparib in BRCA-mutant, triple-negative breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2019; 2019 Mar 29-Apr 3; Atlanta, GA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 3888.

Immunogenicity and safety of the adjuvanted recombinant zoster vaccine in patients with solid tumors, vaccinated before or during chemotherapy: A randomized trial

BACKGROUND

The adjuvanted recombinant zoster vaccine (RZV) has demonstrated >90% efficacy against herpes zoster in adults ≥50 years of age and 68% efficacy in autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients ≥18 years of age. We report the immunogenicity and safety of RZV administered to patients with solid tumors (STs) before or at the start of a chemotherapy cycle.

METHOD

In this phase 2/3 observer-blind, multicenter study (NCT01798056), patients with STs who were ≥18 years of age were randomized (1:1) to receive 2 doses of RZV or placebo 1-2 months apart and stratified (4:1) according to the timing of the first dose with respect to the start of a chemotherapy cycle (first vaccination 8-30 days before the start or at the start [±1 day] of a chemotherapy cycle). Anti-glycoprotein E (gE) antibody concentrations, gE-specific CD4+ T cell frequencies, and vaccine response rates (VRRs) were assessed 1 month after dose 1 and 1 and 12 months after dose 2. Reactogenicity and safety were assessed in the total vaccinated cohort through 12 months after dose 2.

RESULTS

There were 232 participants in the total vaccinated cohort, 185 participants in the according-to-protocol cohort for humoral immunogenicity, and 58 participants in the according-to-protocol cohort for cell-mediated immunogenicity. Postvaccination anti-gE antibody concentrations, gE-specific CD4+ T cell frequencies and VRRs were higher in RZV recipients than in placebo recipients. Solicited adverse events (AEs) were more frequent among RZV recipients than placebo recipients. Incidence of unsolicited AEs, serious AEs, fatalities, and potential immune-mediated diseases were similar between RZV and placebo recipients.

CONCLUSION

RZV was immunogenic in patients with STs receiving immunosuppressive chemotherapies. Humoral and cell-mediated immune responses persisted 1 year after vaccination. No safety concerns were identified.

Prediction of therapy response in bone-predominant metastatic breast cancer: comparison of [18F] fluorodeoxyglucose and [18F]-fluoride PET/CT with whole-body MRI with diffusion-weighted imaging

PURPOSE

To compare [18F]-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) and [18F]-sodium fluoride (NaF) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) with whole-body magnetic resonance with diffusion-weighted imaging (WB-MRI), for endocrine therapy response prediction at 8 weeks in bone-predominant metastatic breast cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Thirty-one patients scheduled for endocrine therapy had up to five bone metastases measured [FDG, NaF PET/CT: maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax); WB-MRI: median apparent diffusion coefficient (ADCmed)] at baseline and 8 weeks. To detect the flare phenomenon, a 12-week NaF PET/CT was also performed if 8-week SUVmax increased. A 25% parameter change differentiated imaging progressive disease (PD) from non-PD and was compared to a 24-week clinical reference standard and progression-free survival (PFS).

RESULTS

Twenty-two patients (median age, 58.6 years, range, 40-79 years) completing baseline and 8-week imaging were included in the final analysis. Per-patient % change in NaF SUVmax predicted 24-week clinical PD with sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of 60, 73.3, and 70%, respectively. For FDG SUVmax the results were 0, 100, and 76.2% and for ADCmed, 0, 100 and 72.2%, respectively. PFS < 24 weeks was associated with % change in SUVmax (NaF: 41.7 vs. 0.7%, p = 0.039; FDG: - 4.8 vs. - 28.6%, p = 0.005) but not ADCmed (- 0.5 vs. 10.1%, p = 0.098). Interlesional response heterogeneity occurred in all modalities and NaF flare occurred in seven patients.

CONCLUSIONS

FDG PET/CT and WB-MRI best predicted clinical non-PD and both FDG and NaF PET/CT predicted PFS < 24 weeks. Lesional response heterogeneity occurs with all modalities and flare is common with NaF PET/CT.

Association of clinicopathological parameters with outcome in patients with metastatic breast cancer treated with eribulin in South East London

e12567

Background: Eribulin is licensed for the ≥2-line treatment of patients with metastatic breast cancer. We assessed outcome of eribulin treatment in real world patients. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of consecutive patients treated with eribulin for metastatic breast cancer at Guys Cancer Centre and affiliated units in South East London between Oct 2011 and Nov 2016. All data was extracted from electronic patient records. Results: We identified 158 patients with a median age of 55.8 years (range 30-94). Median WHO performance status (PS) was 1 (0-4). 68% were of white ethnicity, 23% black and 5% other. 67% were ER+, 13% Her2+ and 26% triple negative breast cancer (TNBC). 96% had visceral disease and 15% of patients had CNS involvement. Eribulin was given in 1% of patients as 1st line, 10% as 2nd, 51% as 3rd, 21% as 4th and 17% as 5thline treatment or beyond. Patients received a median of 4 cycles of eribulin (range 1-35). Median overall survival (OS) was 9.3 months and progression free survival (PFS) 3.4 months. A response was seen in 34% of patients, disease stability in 19%. OS was significantly better for patients > 60 years of age compared to < 60 years (10.3 vs 8.3 months, HR 1.45, 95% CI 1.04-2.10). OS for ER+ was 10.2 vs 7.6 months for ER- and for TNBC. OS for white patients was 9.4 months vs 8 months for black ethnicity. Black patients were younger (median age 50.5 vs 59.9). We observed that amongst TNBC patients black ethnicity had a trend towards longer survival (9.1 months for black vs 7.7 months for white). Due to the retrospective nature of this study toxicity was not well documented. Dose reductions were required in 35% of patients and 3% experienced neutropenic fever. Conclusions: OS was inferior to documented outcome in the EMBRACE trial (9.3 vs 13.1 months). This is despite a lower median number of previous lines of chemotherapy. Our cohort had a poorer baseline PS (20% PS2, 3% PS3 and above vs 8% PS2 in EMBRACE) and a higher proportion of black patients (23% vs 4% in EMBRACE). 15% had known CNS disease. The observation that triple negative patients of black ethnicity fare better than white patients treated with eribulin warrants further exploration.

Long-term Follow-up Data from Pivotal Studies of Adjuvant Trastuzumab in Early Breast Cancer

The addition of adjuvant trastuzumab therapy for 1 year to standard chemotherapy significantly improved disease-free survival and overall survival versus chemotherapy alone in a number of pivotal early breast cancer studies. Here we review long-term follow-up data on the efficacy, cardiac safety, and general safety of trastuzumab in these pivotal studies. We also evaluate ongoing phase II/III adjuvant trials with newer HER2-targeted agents and the efficacy and safety of the recently developed subcutaneous (SC) formulation of trastuzumab in early breast cancer. Long-term follow-up data confirm the significant survival benefit afforded by the addition of trastuzumab to chemotherapy in patients with HER2-positive disease, with an acceptable safety profile. Long-term cardiac safety data suggest that the incidence of cardiac adverse events is maintained at a relatively low level with continued follow-up. At this present time, 1 year of trastuzumab treatment remains the standard of care in HER2-positive early breast cancer. Future adjuvant trastuzumab treatment strategies should focus on reducing cardiotoxicity, particularly in elderly patients, by identifying potential predictive biomarkers of cardiac dysfunction. Clinicians must also decide whether to omit trastuzumab in women who would achieve little benefit from treatment to avoid cardiotoxicity.

IGN-311. Igeneon

Igeneon, under license from Protein Design Labs, is developing IGN-311, an intravenous humanized monoclonal antibody against the Lewis Y carbohydrate antigen, as a potential agent for the passive immunotherapy of cancer, particularly epithelial tumors affecting breast, colon, gastric and pancreatic tissues. A phase I/II trial of IGN-311 was initiated in July 2005.

Phase I study to determine the safety, tolerability and immunostimulatory activity of thalidomide analogue CC-5013 in patients with metastatic malignant melanoma and other advanced cancers

We assessed the safety, tolerability and efficacy of the immunomodulatory drug, CC-5013 (REVIMID™), in the treatment of patients with metastatic malignant melanoma and other advanced cancers. A total of 20 heavily pretreated patients received a dose-escalating regimen of oral CC-5013. Maximal tolerated dose, toxicity and clinical responses were evaluated and analysis of peripheral T-cell surface markers and serum for cytokines and proangiogenic factors were performed. CC-5013 was well tolerated. In all, 87% of adverse effects were classified as grade 1 or grade 2 according to Common Toxicity Criteria and there were no serious adverse events attributable to CC-5013 treatment. Six patients failed to complete the study, three because of disease progression, two withdrew consent and one was entered inappropriately and withdrawn from the study. The remaining 14 patients completed treatment without dose reduction, with one patient achieving partial remission. Evidence of T-cell activation was indicated by significantly increased serum levels of sIL-2 receptor, granulocyte–macrophage colony-stimulating factor, interleukin-12 (IL-12), tumour necrosis factor-α and IL-8 in nine patients from whom serum was available. However, levels of proangiogenic factors vascular endothelial growth factor and basic foetal growth factor were not consistently affected. This study demonstrates the safety, tolerability and suggests the clinical activity of CC-5013 in the treatment of refractory malignant melanoma. Furthermore, this is the first report demonstrating T-cell stimulatory activity of this class of compound in patients with advanced cancer.

Nitrite and nitrate levels in patients with cirrhosis of the liver: influence of kidney function and fasting state

BACKGROUND

Increased serum nitrite/nitrate (NOx) levels, the stable metabolites of nitric oxide (NO), have been reported in patients with cirrhosis. NOx levels, however, are influenced not only by endogenous NO synthesis but also by urinary NOx excretion and dietary intake. We attempted to elucidate factors that influence NOx levels independently of endogenous NO production and to determine the conditions under which NOx levels reflect endogenous production in patients with cirrhosis and healthy controls.

METHODS

NOx serum concentrations and urinary NOx excretion were determined by means of the Griess reaction in relation to Child-Pugh score, kidney function, fasting state, and after exposure to tap water.

RESULTS

Multifactor regression analysis showed inulin clearance (P = 0.0074) and Child-Pugh score (P = 0.0001) to be independent factors predicting NOx levels in patients with cirrhosis. NOx serum levels correlated negatively with the inulin clearance (P < 0.0001), which deteriorated with progressive loss of liver function. NOx levels decreased by about 30% within a 24-h fasting period. After 24 h fasting urinary NOx excretion was not significantly increased in patients with advanced cirrhosis.

CONCLUSION

NOx serum levels, taken as a surrogate for endogenous NO formation, have to be viewed with caution in patients with cirrhosis because they often have impaired kidney function. However, in steady-state conditions after an adequate fasting period NOx levels might be good prognostic markers in patients with cirrhosis since they reflect two possible sequelae of liver insufficiency-namely, increased NO formation and impaired kidney function.