Oligometastatic sarcoma treated with Curative intent Ablative Radiotherapy (OSCAR): A multicenter study on behalf of AIRO (Italian association of Radiotherapy and clinical Oncology)

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy (SABR) is emerging as a valid alternative to surgery in the oligometastatic setting in soft tissue sarcomas (STS), although robust data are lacking. The aim of this study is to evaluate toxicity and efficacy of SABR in oligometastatic STS.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This is a retrospective multicenter study including adult patients affected by stage IV STS, treated with SABR for a maximum of 5 cranial or extracranial metastases in up to 3 different organs. SABR was delivered with ablative purposes. Study endpoints were overall survival (OS), local control (LC), distant progression free survival (DPFS), time to polymetastatic progression (TTPP), time to new systemic therapy (TTNS) and toxicity.

RESULTS

From 10 Italian RT centers, 138 patients (202 metastases) treated between 2010 and 2022 were enrolled in the study. Treatment was generally well tolerated, no acute or late toxicity ≥ G3 was recorded. Median follow up was 42.5 months. Median OS was 39.7 months. Actuarial OS at 1 and 2 years was 91.5 % and 72.7 %. Actuarial LC at 1 and 2 years was 94.8 % and 88.0 %. Median DPFS was 9.7 months. Actuarial DPFS at 1 and 2 years was 40.8 % and 19.4 %.

CONCLUSION

SABR is a safe and effective approach for the treatment of oligometastatic sarcoma. One out of 5 patients is free of progression at 2-years.

Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Spine Oligometastases: A Multicentre Retrospective Study From the Italian Association of Radiotherapy and Clinical Oncology (AIRO)

AIM

To evaluate the efficacy of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for spine oligometastases.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a multicentre retrospective study of a series of patients who received SBRT for spine oligometastases. The efficacy of SBRT was evaluated in terms of local control as the primary endpoint. Survival outcomes were also analysed to identify predictive factors for clinical outcomes. Toxicity was assessed according to CTCAE v4.0.

RESULTS

Between March 2018 and July 2022, 183 lesions in 177 patients were analysed. In most patients, SBRT was delivered to a single spine metastasis (82%) for a median total dose of 21 Gy (14-35 Gy) in three fractions (one to five fractions) and a median BED10 = 119 Gy (57.7-152 Gy). Local control rates were 90.3% at 1 year, 84.3% at 2 years and 84.3% at 3 years. Distant progression-free survival rates were 33.1%, 18.5% and 12.4% at 1, 2 and 3 years, with prostate histology (P = 0.023), oligorecurrent disease (P = 0.04) and BED10 > 100 Gy (P = 0.04) found to be predictive on univariate analysis. A further oligometastatic progression was observed in 33 patients (18.6%) treated with a second course of SBRT, reporting at univariate analysis improved overall survival rates (P = 0.01). Polymetastases-free survival rates were 57.8%, 43.4% and 32.4%; concurrent therapy was related to improved outcomes at multivariate analysis (P = 0.009). Overall survival rates were 91.8%, 79.6% and 65.9%, with prostate histology and non-cervical metastases related to better overall survival at multivariate analysis. Pain-flare after SBRT was recorded in 3.3%; five patients underwent surgical decompression after SBRT; there were no grade ≥3 adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

In our experience of only oligometastatic patients, spine SBRT gave excellent results in terms of safety and efficacy. Prostate histology and oligorecurrent disease were predictive factors for improved clinical outcomes; also, patients who experienced a further oligoprogression after SBRT maintained a survival advantage compared with polymetastatic progression. No severe adverse events were reported.

Management of Patients with Gastric or Gastroesophageal Junction Cancer: From Theory to Integrated Clinical Path- ways Implementation in the Real World

INTRODUCTION

Best care of esophagogastric junction and gastric cancer (EGC) requires a complex, timely interaction between members of a multi-disciplinary team (MDT). An integrated clinical pathway (ICP) is necessary to achieve this goal as well as the implementation of its use in daily practice. The objective of this study was to elaborate on an integrated clinical pathway for the multi-disciplinary management of ECG. Authors also put in act an implementation program to improve adherence to guidelines thought an ICP.

METHOD

This prospective work carried out by a multi-institutional MDT in Italy identified expert panel extracted relevant recommendations and/or statements from published papers and guidelines obtaining a set of crucial interventions employed the Estimate-Talk-Estimate method. A flow-chart diagram was elaborated to elicit the process at a glance. The primary outcome measure was the elaboration of an ICP with a high consensus rate also reported as a snapshot diagram and its implementation in daily clinical practice. An accredited certification body agency validated results, and an implementation process was started in several hospitals known to treat ECG.

RESULTS

A methodologist aggregated a multi-disciplinary panel of experts from different institutions. The panel elaborated a flow-chart diagram with crucial intervention highlight and connecting lines, as well as outcome measures. An accredited certification body agency validated the entire process, representing the basis for empowerment and implementation among patients and oncological professionals in various hospitals.

CONCLUSION

The multi-disciplinary and multi-institutional expert panel successfully elaborated on a validated ICP for all stages ECG. An in-hospital implementation program has been programmed.

A multicenter LArge retrospectIve daTabase on the personalization of Stereotactic ABlative Radiotherapy use in lung metastases from colon-rectal cancer: the LaIT-SABR study

INTRODUCTION

stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) has been shown to increase survival in oligometastatic disease, but local control of colorectal metastases remains poor. We aimed to identify potential predictive factors of SBRT response through a multicenter large retrospective database and to investigate the progression to the polymetastatic disease (PMD).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

the study involved 23 centers, and was approved by the Ethical Committee (Prot. Negrar 2019-ZT). 1033 lung metastases were reported. Clinical and biological parameters were evaluated as predictive for local progression-free survival (FLP). Secondary end-point was the time to the polymetastatic conversion (tPMC).

RESULTS

Two-year FLP was 75.4%. Two-year FLP for lesions treated with a BED <100 Gy, 100-124 Gy, and ≥125 Gy was 76.1%, 70.6%, and 94% (p=0.000). Two-year FLP for lesion measuring ≤10 mm, 10-20 mm, and >20 mm was 79.7%, 77.1%, and 66.6% (p=0.027). At the multivariate analysis a BED ≥125 Gy significantly reduced the risk of local progression (HR 0.24, 95%CI 0.11-0.51; p=0.000). Median tPMC was 26.8 months. Lesions treated with BED ≥125 Gy reported a significantly longer tPMC as compared to lower BED. The median tPMC for patients treated to 1, 2-3 or 4-5 simultaneous oligometastases was 28.5, 25.4, and 9.8 months (p=0.035).

CONCLUSION

The present is the largest series of lung colorectal metastases treated with SABR. The results support the use of SBRT in lung oligometastatic colorectal cancer patients as it might delay the transition to PMD or offer relatively long disease-free period in selected cases. Predictive factors were identified for treatment personalization.

National kidney allograft sharing: a decision analysis

BACKGROUND

Expansion of the current program of national sharing of cadaveric kidney allografts is of uncertain benefit, and the logistical barriers to expanding organ sharing are large. This study estimated the improvement in allograft survival from expanding organ sharing in the United States.

METHODS

A decision analysis based on allograft survival data from cadaveric allograft recipients throughout the United States compared the mean allograft survival resulting from four allograft-sharing strategies: no national sharing, national sharing of allografts matched at 6 histocompatibility alleles, national sharing of allografts matched at 4 or more alleles, and national sharing of allografts matched at 2 or more alleles.

RESULTS

Sharing allografts matched at 4 or more alleles was optimal (mean allograft survival=6.35 years). This survival was little better than the mean survival of the other three strategies (no national sharing, 6.21 years; national sharing of allografts matched at 6 alleles, 6.31 years; and sharing of allografts matched at 2 or more alleles, 6.33 years). The increment in the proportion of allografts surviving 4 years or more under the optimal strategy compared with no national sharing was <2%. A similar decision model comparing kidney transplant outcomes before and after the introduction of cyclosporine showed that this drug has had a much greater impact on mean allograft survival than would be expected to occur with national allograft sharing: 6.07 years with cyclosporine versus 3.79 years without cyclosporine.

CONCLUSIONS

Expanding national allograft sharing would achieve little improvement in mean allograft survival. The limited benefit and logistical barriers to expansion of allograft sharing should be considered before following recommendations to expand the current U.S. allograft-sharing program.

Recipient body size and cadaveric renal allograft survival

Transplantation of renal allografts inadequate to meet recipient metabolic demands has been hypothesized to be one cause of chronic allograft failure. This cohort study examined the relationship of each of three measures of recipient body size and one measure of recipient metabolic rate to the rate of allograft failure among 239 recipients of cadaveric renal allografts between 1985 and 1990. All subjects were followed until allograft failure, death, or December 31, 1992, whichever occurred first. Using multivariate Cox proportional hazards analysis, all measures of recipient size and metabolic rate were found to be strong and statistically significant predictors of allograft survival adjusted for other predictors of allograft survival including allograft rejection, delayed allograft function, recipient race, prior renal transplantation, and donor age. The adjusted relative risk (RR) of allograft failure for a 15-kg increase in recipient body weight was 1.47, P < 0.0001 (95% confidence interval (CI), 1.21-1.78); adjusted RR for a 10-U increase in recipient body mass index was 2.34, P < 0.0001 (95% CI, 1.53-3.58); adjusted RR for a 0.5 m2 increase in recipient body surface area was 2.34, P < 0.001 (95% CI, 1.40-3.91); and adjusted RR for a 250 Kcal increase in metabolic rate was 1.49, P < 0.01 (95% CI, 1.17-1.89). These results are consistent with prior research indicating that a renal tissue supply-demand mismatch may accelerate failure of renal allografts. Alternative explanations of this relationship between recipient body size and allograft survival include inadequate immunosuppressive medication administration among recipients with a larger body size. Additional research is warranted to examine more fully the relationship between recipient body size and allograft survival.