Imperfect vaccine can yield multiple Nash equilibria in vaccination games

As infectious diseases continue to threaten communities across the globe, people are faced with a choice to vaccinate, or not. Many factors influence this decision, such as the cost of the disease, the chance of contracting the disease, the population vaccination coverage, and the efficacy of the vaccine. While the vaccination games in which individuals decide whether to vaccinate or not based on their own interests are gaining in popularity in recent years, the vaccine imperfection has been an overlooked aspect so far. In this paper we investigate the effects of an imperfect vaccine on the outcomes of a vaccination game. We use a simple SIR compartmental model for the underlying model of disease transmission. We model the vaccine imperfection by adding vaccination at birth and maintain a possibility for the vaccinated individual to become infected. We derive explicit conditions for the existence of different Nash equilibria, the solutions of the vaccination game. The outcomes of the game depend on the complex interplay between disease transmission dynamics (the basic reproduction number), the relative cost of the infection, and the vaccine efficacy. We show that for diseases with relatively low basic reproduction numbers (smaller than about 2.62), there is a little difference between outcomes for perfect or imperfect vaccines and thus the simpler models assuming perfect vaccines are good enough. However, when the basic reproduction number is above 2.62, then, unlike in the case of a perfect vaccine, there can be multiple equilibria. Moreover, unless there is a mandatory vaccination policy in place that would push the vaccination coverage above the value of unstable Nash equilibrium, the population could eventually slip to the "do not vaccinate" state. Thus, for diseases that have relatively high basic reproduction numbers, the potential for the vaccine not being perfect should be explicitly considered in the models.

Voluntary vaccination may not stop monkeypox outbreak: A game-theoretic model

Monkeypox (MPX) is a viral zoonotic disease that was endemic to Central and West Africa. However, during the first half of 2022, MPX spread to almost 60 countries all over the world. Smallpox vaccines are about 85% effective in preventing MPX infections. Our objective is to determine whether the vaccines should be mandated or whether voluntary use of the vaccine could be enough to stop the MPX outbreak. We incorporate a standard SVEIR compartmental model of MPX transmission into a game-theoretical framework. We study a vaccination game in which individuals decide whether or not to vaccinate by assessing their benefits and costs. We solve the game for Nash equilibria, i.e., the vaccination rates the individuals would likely adopt without any outside intervention. We show that, without vaccination, MPX can become endemic in previously non-endemic regions, including the United States. We also show that to "not vaccinate" is often an optimal solution from the individual's perspective. Moreover, we demonstrate that, for some parameter values, there are multiple equilibria of the vaccination game, and they exhibit a backward bifurcation. Thus, without centrally mandated minimal vaccination rates, the population could easily revert to no vaccination scenario.