Contingent attentional capture or delayed allocation of attention?

Under certain circumstances, external stimuli will elicit an involuntary shift of spatial attention, referred to as attentional capture. According to the contingent involuntary orienting account (Folk, Remington, & Johnston, 1992), capture is conditioned by top-down factors that set attention to respond involuntarily to stimulus properties relevant to one's behavioral goals. Evidence for this comes from spatial cuing studies showing that a spatial cuing effect is observed only when cues have goal-relevant properties. Here, we examine alternative, decision-level explanations of the spatial cuing effect that attribute evidence of capture to postpresentation delays in the voluntary allocation of attention, rather than to on-line involuntary shifts in direct response to the cue. In three spatial cuing experiments, delayed-allocation accounts were tested by examining whether items at the cued location were preferentially processed. The experiments provide evidence that costs and benefits in spatial cuing experiments do reflect the on-line capture of attention. The implications of these results for models of attentional control are discussed.

Combining attributes in rapid serial visual presentation tasks

A series of three exploratory experiments sought to compare and contrast two broad classes of theory pertaining to visual information pick-up. One theoretical approach, exemplified by Keele and Neill (1978) and by Treisman (1977) emphasizes the relatively passive, parallel development of information codes, with subsequent attentional integration of contiguous codes into a percept. Another theoretical approach, exemplified by Broadbent (1977a) emphasizes the relatively active, sequential, recursive interrogation of a visual display in which the pick-up of each piece of information guides the perceptual system in its quest for more information. The manner in which separable attributes of visual information are picked up and combined was studied by manipulating the roles of different attributes in a rapid serial visual presentation (RSVP) paradigm. Observers were asked to report the name of a letter in a specified target colour; to report the colour of a specified target letter; to report the colour of a specified target numeral embedded in a list of letters; to report the colour of an unspecified numeral embedded in a list of letters; and to perform the latter two tasks without knowing in which of two alternating spatial positions the target might appear. Examination of the patterns of mis-combinations of attributes from target and non-target stimuli yields evidence both for and against each theoretical position, and suggests that the two might better be considered as modes of processing available to the perceptual system, rather than as intrinsic properties of that system.

Moving attention through visual space

Several experiments have shown that attention as measured by simple reaction time to luminance increments can be shifted in the visual field while the eyes are kept in a fixed position. The shift of attention appears to take place within 50 msec following a cue indicating the most likely position of the target. The present study reports that these shifts of attention can be time locked to a central cue. Moreover, they show that a probe event located between the cue and the target receives maximal facilitation from attention at a time prior to maximal facilitation at the target. These results provide support for an analogue movement of attention across the visual field that does not involve the suppression found during saccades.

Moving attention through visual space

Several experiments have shown that attention as measured by simple reaction time to luminance increments can be shifted in the visual field while the eyes are kept in a fixed position. The shift of attention appears to take place within 50 msec following a cue indicating the most likely position of the target. The present study reports that these shifts of attention can be time locked to a central cue. Moreover, they show that a probe event located between the cue and the target receives maximal facilitation from attention at a time prior to maximal facilitation at the target. These results provide support for an analogue movement of attention across the visual field that does not involve the suppression found during saccades.