Awareness during laryngoscopy and intubation: quantitating incidence following induction of balanced anesthesia with etomidate and cisatracurium as detected with the isolated forearm technique.
J Clin Anesth 2000;
12:104-8. [PMID:
10818323 DOI:
10.1016/s0952-8180(00)00127-6]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
STUDY OBJECTIVE
To measure the incidence of awareness during induction of anesthesia with etomidate and fentanyl, and to model its frequency as a function of dose of etomidate.
DESIGN
Prospective cohort study.
SETTING
Anesthesia department of a university hospital.
PATIENTS
30 ASA physical status I, II, and III patients undergoing elective general surgery.
INTERVENTIONS
Patients were assigned to one of three groups of etomidate (0.2 mg/kg, 0.3 mg/kg, 0.4 mg/kg) and received fentanyl (2 microg/kg) and 2 x ED(95) of cisatracurium (0.1 mg/kg). Neuromuscular block was monitored with a peripheral nerve stimulator. Intubation was performed after maximum T(1)-depression. To identify awareness, the isolated forearm technique (IFT) was used. The IFT was performed by prompting the patient every 20 seconds. Only a verified response was considered a positive IFT response. Anesthesia was maintained with isoflurane in oxygen/air and fentanyl.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS
Maximum neuromuscular block occurred after 352 +/- 96 seconds and intubation was performed 424 +/- 86 seconds after loss of consciousness (LOC). Awareness was dose dependent: 80% of patients receiving 0.2 mg/kg etomidate, 70% of patients receiving 0.3 mg/kg etomidate, and 20% of patients receiving 0.4 mg/kg etomidate had a positive IFT response. Awareness occurred in one patient 3 minutes after LOC, in 65% during laryngoscopy, and in 30% within the following 120 seconds. One patient had explicit recall without finding awareness unpleasant. Hemodynamic parameters did not differ between patients with a positive or a negative IFT response.
CONCLUSIONS
The incidence of awareness during bolus induction can be modeled as dose dependent. However, when combining a short-acting induction drug and a delayed-onset neuromuscular blocker, the continuous infusion of the hypnotic drug may prevent awareness during induction.
Collapse