1
|
Sijmons JML, Zamaray B, Veld JV, Warps AK, Dekker JWT, Tuynman JB, van Westreenen HL, Consten ECJ, Tanis PJ. Relief of Obstruction in Left-Sided Obstructive Colon Cancer: Nationwide Analysis of Applied Treatment in the Palliative Setting. J Gastrointest Cancer 2024:10.1007/s12029-023-01010-6. [PMID: 38168860 DOI: 10.1007/s12029-023-01010-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/24/2023] [Indexed: 01/05/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND For relief of bowel obstruction in left-sided obstructive colon cancer (LSOCC), a self-expandable metal stent (SEMS) or decompressing stoma (DS) can be placed. In a curative setting, these two strategies have been extensively studied as a bridge to elective resection. Guidelines recommend SEMS as the preferred option in the palliative setting, but adherence in daily practice is unknown. Therefore, this study aimed to gain more insight into patients with LSOCC who received palliative treatment with SEMS or DS at a national level. METHODS A retrospective population-based cohort study was conducted in the Netherlands. Data from the Netherlands Cancer Registry (NCR) on all patients with LSOCC treated with DS or SEMS not followed by resection of the primary tumour between January 1, 2015, and December 31, 2019, were analysed. Type of treatment (DS or SEMS) for different clinical scenarios, was the main outcome of this study, and was also evaluated over the years (2015-2019). RESULTS Palliative treatment with SEMS or DS for LSOCC was performed in 1077 patients, of whom 79.2% had metastatic disease (M1). Patients without metastatic disease (M0) were older (≥ 80 years M0 67.4%, M1 25.3%, P < 0.001), had a worse clinical condition (ASA III 51.4% versus 36.37%, ASA IV-V 13.3% versus 4.0% P < 0.001) and presented with higher tumour stage (cT4 55.4% versus 33.5%, % P < 0.001). DS was performed in 91.5% of the patients and SEMS in 8.5%. The proportion of DS did not significantly differ between patients with M1 and M0 (91.8% vs. 90.2% respectively, P = 0.525). No increase in SEMS application was observed over the years, with a stable overall proportion of DS of 91-92% per year. In the multivariable analyses, ninety-day mortality and overall survival were not significantly different between SEMS and DS. CONCLUSIONS This study revealed that DS was the primary treatment modality for palliative management of LSOCC in the Netherlands between 2015 and 2019, while the guidelines recommended SEMS as preferred treatment. For patients with LSOCC eligible for stenting in the palliative setting, SEMS placement should become more available and accessible as the preferred treatment option, to avoid a stoma in the terminal phase of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J M L Sijmons
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9 Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Dutch Institute for Clinical Auditing, Rijsburgerweg 10, Leiden, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Treatment and quality of life, De Boelelaan 1118, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - B Zamaray
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9 Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Treatment and quality of life, De Boelelaan 1118, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - J V Veld
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - A K Warps
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Centre Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - J W T Dekker
- Department of Surgery, Reinier de Graaf Groep, Reinier de Graafweg 5, Delft, The Netherlands
| | - J B Tuynman
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - H L van Westreenen
- Department of Surgery, Isala Hospital, Dokter van Heesweg 2, Zwolle, The Netherlands
| | - E C J Consten
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Centre Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, Groningen, The Netherlands
- Meander Medical Centre, Department of Surgery, Maatweg 3, Amersfoort, The Netherlands
| | - P J Tanis
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9 Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Treatment and quality of life, De Boelelaan 1118, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
- Department of Surgical Oncology and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Erasmus MC, Doctor Molewaterplein 40, Rotterdam, 3015 GD, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Giesen LJX, Dekker JWT, Verseveld M, Crolla RMPH, van der Schelling GP, Verhoef C, Olthof PB. Implementation of robotic rectal cancer surgery: a cross-sectional nationwide study. Surg Endosc 2023; 37:912-920. [PMID: 36042043 PMCID: PMC9945537 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-022-09568-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2022] [Accepted: 08/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
AIM An increasing number of centers have implemented a robotic surgical program for rectal cancer. Several randomized controls trials have shown similar oncological and postoperative outcomes compared to standard laparoscopic resections. While introducing a robot rectal resection program seems safe, there are no data regarding implementation on a nationwide scale. Since 2018 robot resections are separately registered in the mandatory Dutch Colorectal Audit. The present study aims to evaluate the trend in the implementation of robotic resections (RR) for rectal cancer relative to laparoscopic rectal resections (LRR) in the Netherlands between 2018 and 2020 and to compare the differences in outcomes between the operative approaches. METHODS Patients with rectal cancer who underwent surgical resection between 2018 and 2020 were selected from the Dutch Colorectal Audit. The data included patient characteristics, disease characteristics, surgical procedure details, postoperative outcomes. The outcomes included any complication within 90 days after surgery; data were categorized according to surgical approach. RESULTS Between 2018 and 2020, 6330 patients were included in the analyses. 1146 patients underwent a RR (18%), 3312 patients a LRR (51%), 526 (8%) an open rectal resection, 641 a TaTME (10%), and 705 had a local resection (11%). The proportion of males and distal tumors was higher in the RR compared to the LRR. Over time, the proportion of robotic procedures increased from 15% (95% confidence intervals (CI) 13-16%) in 2018 to 22% (95% CI 20-24%) in 2020. Conversion rate was lower in the robotic group [4% (95% CI 3-5%) versus 7% (95% CI 6-8%)]. Anastomotic leakage rate was similar with 16%. Defunctioning ileostomies were more common in the RR group [42% (95% CI 38-46%) versus 29% (95% CI 26-31%)]. CONCLUSION Rectal resections are increasingly being performed through a robot-assisted approach in the Netherlands. The proportion of males and low rectal cancers was higher in RR compared to LRR. Overall outcomes were comparable, while conversion rate was lower in RR, the proportion of defunctioning ileostomies was higher compared to LRR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L J X Giesen
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
- Department of Surgery, Franciscus Gasthuis & Vlietland, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - J W T Dekker
- Department of Surgery, Reinier de Graaf Gasthuis, Delft, The Netherlands
| | - M Verseveld
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, Franciscus Gasthuis & Vlietland, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - R M P H Crolla
- Department of Surgery, Amphia Hospital, Breda, The Netherlands
| | | | - C Verhoef
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - P B Olthof
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ubels S, Verstegen M, Klarenbeek B, Bouwense S, van Berge Henegouwen M, Daams F, van Det MJ, Griffiths EA, Haveman JW, Heisterkamp J, Koshy R, Nieuwenhuijzen G, Polat F, Siersema PD, Singh P, Wijnhoven B, Hannink G, van Workum F, Rosman C, Matthée E, Slootmans CAM, Ultee G, Schouten J, Gisbertz SS, Eshuis WJ, Kalff MC, Feenstra ML, van der Peet DL, Stam WT, van Etten B, Poelmann F, Vuurberg N, van den Berg JW, Martijnse IS, Matthijsen RM, Luyer M, Curvers W, Nieuwenhuijzen T, Taselaar AE, Kouwenhoven EA, Lubbers M, Sosef M, Lecot F, Geraedts TCM, van Esser S, Dekker JWT, van den Wildenberg F, Kelder W, Lubbers M, Baas PC, de Haas JWA, Hartgrink HH, Bahadoer RR, van Sandick JW, Hartemink KJ, Veenhof X, Stockmann H, Gorgec B, Weeder P, Wiezer MJ, Genders CMS, Belt E, Blomberg B, van Duijvendijk P, Claassen L, Reetz D, Steenvoorde P, Mastboom W, Klein Ganseij HJ, van Dalsen AD, Joldersma A, Zwakman M, Groenendijk RPR, Montazeri M, Mercer S, Knight B, van Boxel G, McGregor RJ, Skipworth RJE, Frattini C, Bradley A, Nilsson M, Hayami M, Huang B, Bundred J, Evans R, Grimminger PP, van der Sluis PC, Eren U, Saunders J, Theophilidou E, Khanzada Z, Elliott JA, Ponten J, King S, Reynolds JV, Sgromo B, Akbari K, Shalaby S, Gutschow CA, Schmidt H, Vetter D, Moorthy K, Ibrahim MAH, Christodoulidis G, Räsänen JV, Kauppi J, Söderström H, Manatakis DK, Korkolis DP, Balalis D, Rompu A, Alkhaffaf B, Alasmar M, Arebi M, Piessen G, Nuytens F, Degisors S, Ahmed A, Boddy A, Gandhi S, Fashina O, Van Daele E, Pattyn P, Robb WB, Arumugasamy M, Al Azzawi M, Whooley J, Colak E, Aybar E, Sari AC, Uyanik MS, Ciftci AB, Sayyed R, Ayub B, Murtaza G, Saeed A, Ramesh P, Charalabopoulos A, Liakakos T, Schizas D, Baili E, Kapelouzou A, Valmasoni M, Pierobon ES, Capovilla G, Merigliano S, Silviu C, Rodica B, Florin A, Cristian Gelu R, Petre H, Guevara Castro R, Salcedo AF, Negoi I, Negoita VM, Ciubotaru C, Stoica B, Hostiuc S, Colucci N, Mönig SP, Wassmer CH, Meyer J, Takeda FR, Aissar Sallum RA, Ribeiro U, Cecconello I, Toledo E, Trugeda MS, Fernández MJ, Gil C, Castanedo S, Isik A, Kurnaz E, Videira JF, Peyroteo M, Canotilho R, Weindelmayer J, Giacopuzzi S, De Pasqual CA, Bruna M, Mingol F, Vaque J, Pérez C, Phillips AW, Chmelo J, Brown J, Han LE, Gossage JA, Davies AR, Baker CR, Kelly M, Saad M, Bernardi D, Bonavina L, Asti E, Riva C, Scaramuzzo R, Elhadi M, Abdelkarem Ahmed H, Elhadi A, Elnagar FA, Msherghi AAA, Wills V, Campbell C, Perez Cerdeira M, Whiting S, Merrett N, Das A, Apostolou C, Lorenzo A, Sousa F, Adelino Barbosa J, Devezas V, Barbosa E, Fernandes C, Smith G, Li EY, Bhimani N, Chan P, Kotecha K, Hii MW, Ward SM, Johnson M, Read M, Chong L, Hollands MJ, Allaway M, Richardson A, Johnston E, Chen AZL, Kanhere H, Prasad S, McQuillan P, Surman T, Trochsler MI, Schofield WA, Ahmed SK, Reid JL, Harris MC, Gananadha S, Farrant J, Rodrigues N, Fergusson J, Hindmarsh A, Afzal Z, Safranek P, Sujendran V, Rooney S, Loureiro C, Leturio Fernández S, Díez del Val I, Jaunoo S, Kennedy L, Hussain A, Theodorou D, Triantafyllou T, Theodoropoulos C, Palyvou T, Elhadi M, Abdullah Ben Taher F, Ekheel M, Msherghi AAA. Severity of oEsophageal Anastomotic Leak in patients after oesophagectomy: the SEAL score. Br J Surg 2022. [DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znac226] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Anastomotic leak (AL) is a common but severe complication after oesophagectomy. It is unknown how to determine the severity of AL objectively at diagnosis. Determining leak severity may guide treatment decisions and improve future research. This study aimed to identify leak-related prognostic factors for mortality, and to develop a Severity of oEsophageal Anastomotic Leak (SEAL) score.
Methods
This international, retrospective cohort study in 71 centres worldwide included patients with AL after oesophagectomy between 2011 and 2019. The primary endpoint was 90-day mortality. Leak-related prognostic factors were identified after adjusting for confounders and were included in multivariable logistic regression to develop the SEAL score. Four classes of leak severity (mild, moderate, severe, and critical) were defined based on the risk of 90-day mortality, and the score was validated internally.
Results
Some 1509 patients with AL were included and the 90-day mortality rate was 11.7 per cent. Twelve leak-related prognostic factors were included in the SEAL score. The score showed good calibration and discrimination (c-index 0.77, 95 per cent c.i. 0.73 to 0.81). Higher classes of leak severity graded by the SEAL score were associated with a significant increase in duration of ICU stay, healing time, Comprehensive Complication Index score, and Esophagectomy Complications Consensus Group classification.
Conclusion
The SEAL score grades leak severity into four classes by combining 12 leak-related predictors and can be used to the assess severity of AL after oesophagectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sander Ubels
- Department of Surgery, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Centre , Nijmegen , the Netherlands
| | - Moniek Verstegen
- Department of Surgery, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Centre , Nijmegen , the Netherlands
| | - Bastiaan Klarenbeek
- Department of Surgery, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Centre , Nijmegen , the Netherlands
| | - Stefan Bouwense
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre+ , Maastricht , the Netherlands
| | - Mark van Berge Henegouwen
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Cancer Centre Amsterdam, University of Amsterdam , Amsterdam , the Netherlands
| | - Freek Daams
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Cancer Centre Amsterdam, University of Amsterdam , Amsterdam , the Netherlands
| | - Marc J van Det
- Department of Surgery, ZGT hospital group , Almelo , the Netherlands
| | - Ewen A Griffiths
- Department of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham , Birmingham , UK
- Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham , Birmingham , UK
| | - Jan W Haveman
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen , Groningen , the Netherlands
| | - Joos Heisterkamp
- Department of Surgery, Elisabeth-TweeSteden Hospital , Tilburg , the Netherlands
| | - Renol Koshy
- Department of Surgery, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospital NHS Trust , Newcastle upon Tyne , UK
- Department of Surgery, University Hospitals of Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust , Coventry , UK
| | | | - Fatih Polat
- Department of Surgery, Canisius-Wilhelmina Hospital , Nijmegen , the Netherlands
| | - Peter D Siersema
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Centre , Nijmegen , The Netherlands
| | - Pritam Singh
- Department of Surgery, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust , Nottingham , UK
- Department of Surgery, Regional Oesophago-Gastric Unit, Royal Surrey County Hospital , Guildford , UK
| | - Bas Wijnhoven
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Centre , Rotterdam , the Netherlands
| | - Gerjon Hannink
- Department of Operating Rooms, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Centre , Nijmegen , The Netherlands
| | - Frans van Workum
- Department of Surgery, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Centre , Nijmegen , the Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, Canisius-Wilhelmina Hospital , Nijmegen , the Netherlands
| | - Camiel Rosman
- Department of Surgery, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Centre , Nijmegen , the Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Warps AK, Saraste D, Westerterp M, Detering R, Sjövall A, Martling A, Dekker JWT, Tollenaar RAEM, Matthiessen P, Tanis PJ. National differences in implementation of minimally invasive surgery for colorectal cancer and the influence on short-term outcomes. Surg Endosc 2022; 36:5986-6001. [PMID: 35258664 PMCID: PMC9283170 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-021-08974-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2021] [Accepted: 12/31/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Background The timing and degree of implementation of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for colorectal cancer vary among countries. Insights in national differences regarding implementation of new surgical techniques and the effect on postoperative outcomes are important for quality assurance, can show potential areas for country-specific improvement, and might be illustrative and supportive for similar implementation programs in other countries. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate differences in patient selection, applied techniques, and results of minimal invasive surgery for colorectal cancer between the Netherlands and Sweden. Methods Patients who underwent elective minimally invasive surgery for T1-3 colon or rectal cancer (2012–2018) registered in the Dutch ColoRectal Audit or Swedish ColoRectal Cancer Registry were included. Time trends in the application of MIS were determined. Outcomes were compared for time periods with a similar level of MIS implementation (Netherlands 2012–2013 versus Sweden 2017–2018). Multilevel analyses were performed to identify factors associated with adverse short-term outcomes. Results A total of 46,095 Dutch and 8,819 Swedish patients undergoing MIS for colorectal cancer were included. In Sweden, MIS implementation was approximately 5 years later than in the Netherlands, with more robotic surgery and lower volumes per hospital. Although conversion rates were higher in Sweden, oncological and surgical outcomes were comparable. MIS in the Netherlands for the years 2012–2013 resulted in a higher reoperation rate for colon cancer and a higher readmission rate but lower non-surgical complication rates for rectal cancer if compared with MIS in Sweden during 2017–2018. Conclusion This study showed that the implementation of MIS for colorectal cancer occurred later in Sweden than the Netherlands, with comparable outcomes despite lower volumes. Our study demonstrates that new surgical techniques can be implemented at a national level in a controlled and safe way, with thorough quality assurance. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00464-021-08974-1.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A K Warps
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Centre, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA, Leiden, Netherlands.,Dutch Institute for Clinical Auditing, Rijnsburgerweg 10, 2333 AA, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - D Saraste
- Department of Surgery, Södersjukhuset, 118 83, Stockholm, Sweden.,Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Insitutet, 171 76, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - M Westerterp
- Department of Surgery, Haagland Medisch Centrum, Lijnbaan 32, 2512 VA, Den Haag, Netherlands
| | - R Detering
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - A Sjövall
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Insitutet, 171 76, Stockholm, Sweden.,Department of Surgery, Karolinska University Hospital, Anna Steckséns gata 53, 171 64, Solna, Sweden
| | - A Martling
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Insitutet, 171 76, Stockholm, Sweden.,Department of Surgery, Karolinska University Hospital, Anna Steckséns gata 53, 171 64, Solna, Sweden
| | - J W T Dekker
- Department of Surgery, Reinier de Graaf Groep, Reinier de Graafweg 5, 2625 AD, Delft, Netherlands
| | - R A E M Tollenaar
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Centre, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA, Leiden, Netherlands.,Dutch Institute for Clinical Auditing, Rijnsburgerweg 10, 2333 AA, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - P Matthiessen
- Department of Surgery, Örebro University Hospital, von Rosens väg 1, 70185, Örebro, Sweden.,Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Örebro University, 70182, Örebro, Sweden
| | - P J Tanis
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, University of Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Giesen LJX, Olthof PB, Elferink MAG, van Westreenen HL, Beets GL, Verhoef C, Dekker JWT. Changes in rectal cancer treatment after the introduction of a national screening program; Increasing use of less invasive strategies within a national cohort. Eur J Surg Oncol 2021; 48:1117-1122. [PMID: 34872776 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2021.11.132] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2021] [Revised: 11/18/2021] [Accepted: 11/26/2021] [Indexed: 10/19/2022] Open
Abstract
AIM Organ preserving treatment strategies and the introduction of a colorectal cancer-screening program have likely influenced the resection rates of rectal cancer. The aim of this study is to assess the influence of these developments on rectal cancer treatment and resection rates in the Netherlands. METHODS Patients diagnosed with non-metastatic rectal cancer between 2013 and 2018, were selected from the Netherlands Cancer Registry. The distribution of surgical and neo-adjuvant treatment and resection rates were analyzed and compared over time. RESULTS Between 2013 and 2018 22640 patients were diagnosed with non-metastatic rectal cancer. The incidence of early stage (cT1) disease increased from 141 (4%) in 2013 to 448 (12%) in 2018. The use of neoadjuvant radiotherapy and chemo-radiotherapy dropped from 39% to 21% and 34%-25%, respectively. A decrease in surgical resection rates (including TEM) was observed from 85% to 73%. The proportion of patients who underwent endoscopic resections increased from 3% to 10%. The decrease in surgical resection rates was larger in patients treated with neo-adjuvant chemo-radiotherapy. CONCLUSION An increase in stage I disease is noted after the introduction of the screening program. Surgical resection rates for rectal cancer have fallen over time. Endoscopic resections due to more early-stage disease probably accounts for a large part of this decline. Furthermore, a watch and wait approach after neo-adjuvant chemo-radiotherapy may play an important role as well.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L J X Giesen
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - P B Olthof
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Surgery, Reinier de Graaf Gasthuis, Delft, the Netherlands
| | - M A G Elferink
- Department of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation IKNL, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | | | - G L Beets
- Department of Surgery, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - C Verhoef
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - J W T Dekker
- Department of Surgery, Reinier de Graaf Gasthuis, Delft, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Warps AK, Tollenaar RAEM, Tanis PJ, Dekker JWT. Postoperative complications after colorectal cancer surgery and the association with long-term survival. Eur J Surg Oncol 2021; 48:873-882. [PMID: 34801319 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2021.10.035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2021] [Revised: 09/22/2021] [Accepted: 10/30/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Complications after colorectal cancer surgery can worsen long-term survival. The aim of this nationwide study was to determine the impact of different types of complications on overall survival (OS) and conditional survival if still alive one year postoperatively (CS-1) after colorectal cancer surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS All patients registered in the Dutch ColoRectal Audit after resection of primary colorectal cancer between 2011 and 2017 and with known survival status were included. Multivariable Cox regression models were used to assess the association of complications with OS and CS-1, thereby calculating the Hazard Ratio (HR) with 95% Confidence Interval. RESULTS 43,908 colon and 16,955 rectal cancer patients were included. Median follow-up time was 66.1 and 66.5 months, respectively. Five-year OS after colon cancer resection was 73.2% without complications, and 65.4% with surgical, 52.9% with non-surgical and 51.8% with combined type of complications (p < 0.001). Corresponding 5-year OS for rectal cancer patients was 76.9%, 72.7%, 64.9%, and 63.2% (p < 0.001). In colon cancer, multivariable analyses revealed HR 1.198 (1.136-1.264) for surgical, HR 1.489 (1.423-1.558) for non-surgical and HR 1.590 (1.505-1.681) for combined type of complications. For rectal cancer, these HRs were 1.193 (1.097-1.2297), 1.456 (1.346-1.329), and 1.489 (1.357-1.633). Surgical complications were associated with worse CS-1 in rectal cancer (HR 1.140 (1.050-1.260), but not in colon cancer (HR 1.007 (0.943-1.075)). CONCLUSION Non-surgical complications have higher impact on survival than surgical complications. The impact of surgical complications on survival was still measurable after surviving the first year in rectal cancer but not in colon cancer patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A K Warps
- Leiden University Medical Centre, Department of Surgery, Albinusdreef 2, 2333, ZA, Leiden, the Netherlands; Dutch Institute for Clinical Auditing, Rijnsburgerweg 10, 2333, AA, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - R A E M Tollenaar
- Leiden University Medical Centre, Department of Surgery, Albinusdreef 2, 2333, ZA, Leiden, the Netherlands; Dutch Institute for Clinical Auditing, Rijnsburgerweg 10, 2333, AA, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - P J Tanis
- Amsterdam University Medical Centres, Department of Surgery, University of Amsterdam, Cancer Centre Amsterdam, 1117 Boelelaan, 1081, HV, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - J W T Dekker
- Reinier de Graaf Groep, Department of Surgery, Reinier de Graafweg 5, 2625, AD, Delft, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Warps AK, Detering R, Tollenaar RAEM, Tanis PJ, Dekker JWT. Textbook outcome after rectal cancer surgery as a composite measure for quality of care: A population-based study. Eur J Surg Oncol 2021; 47:2821-2829. [PMID: 34120807 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2021.05.045] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2021] [Revised: 04/09/2021] [Accepted: 05/28/2021] [Indexed: 10/21/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Textbook outcome is a composite measure of combined outcome indicators, which has been suggested to be of additional value over single outcome parameters in clinical auditing of surgical treatment. This study aimed to assess textbook outcome after rectal cancer surgery as short-term marker for quality of care. MATERIALS AND METHODS Patients who underwent elective rectal cancer surgery between 2012 and 2019 and registered in the Dutch ColoRectal Audit were included. Textbook outcome was achieved when the following criteria were met: 30-day and primary hospital admission survival, no reintervention, tumour-free margins, no postoperative complications, a hospital stay of less than 14 days and no readmission. Hospital variation was evaluated in case-mix corrected funnel-plots. A multilevel logistic regression analysis was performed to identify associated factors with textbook outcome. RESULTS The study population consisted of 20,521 patients who underwent primary rectal cancer surgery, of whom 56.3% achieved textbook outcome. Postoperative complications were the main contributor to not achieving textbook outcome. Case-mix corrected funnel plots demonstrated that underperforming hospitals in 2012-2015 were no underperformers in 2016-2019 anymore. Female sex, laparoscopic surgery, and rectal resection without defunctioning stoma creation were positively associated with textbook outcome. CONCLUSION Textbook outcome after rectal cancer resection is mainly driven by postoperative complications. Although textbook outcome showed some discriminating value for identifying underperforming hospitals, it does not fit the plan-do-check-act cycle of clinical auditing. In our opinion, textbook outcome has little added value to the current outcome indicators for rectal cancer surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A K Warps
- Leiden University Medical Centre, Department of Surgery, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA, Leiden, the Netherlands; Dutch Institute for Clinical Auditing, Rijnsburgerweg 10, 2333 AA, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - R Detering
- Amsterdam University Medical Centres, Department of Surgery, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - R A E M Tollenaar
- Leiden University Medical Centre, Department of Surgery, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA, Leiden, the Netherlands; Dutch Institute for Clinical Auditing, Rijnsburgerweg 10, 2333 AA, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - P J Tanis
- Amsterdam University Medical Centres, Department of Surgery, University of Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - J W T Dekker
- Reinier de Graaf Groep, Department of Surgery, Reinier de Graafweg 5, 2625 AD, Delft, the Netherlands.
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Giesen LJX, Olthof PB, Elferink MAG, Verhoef C, Dekker JWT. Surgery for rectal cancer: Differences in resection rates among hospitals in the Netherlands. Eur J Surg Oncol 2021; 47:2384-2389. [PMID: 33985828 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2021.04.030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2020] [Revised: 03/14/2021] [Accepted: 04/21/2021] [Indexed: 10/21/2022] Open
Abstract
AIM Numerous quality improvement initiatives for rectal cancer surgery have focused on textbook outcome parameters. In these studies, resection rate and patients who did not undergo surgery are not included, but these parameters might help to evaluate the surgical care for rectal cancer. The aim of this study is to assess the variation of non-metastatic rectal cancer resection rates among hospitals and its effect on patient outcomes. METHODS All patients diagnosed with non-metastatic rectal cancer between 2013 and 2018 were selected from the Netherlands Cancer Registry. Hospitals were categorized in quartiles according to resection rates. A multivariable logistic analysis was performed to determine variation in resection rate between these quartiles using a logistic regression analysis to correct for confounders. The association between resection rates and survival was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier method and Cox-regression analysis. RESULTS A total of 22,530 patients were included in the analysis. Resection rates varied from 68 to 89% between hospitals. After multivariable analysis, resection rate remained significantly different among the quartiles when correcting for several factors (odds ratio (95%Confidence-interval) 1.71 (1.56-1.88), 2.42 (2.19-2.67), and 4.04 (3.61-4.53) for increasing resection rate quartiles, in reference to the lowest quartile). A higher resection rate was associated with better overall survival, in multivariable analysis this survival benefit could no longer be identified. CONCLUSION There is a substantial variation in resection rates for rectal cancer among hospitals in the Netherlands with an impact on overall survival. This may be a relevant issue when analyzing the overall quality of rectal cancer care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L J X Giesen
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - P B Olthof
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Surgery, Reinier de Graaf Gasthuis, Delft, the Netherlands
| | - M A G Elferink
- Department of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL), Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - C Verhoef
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - J W T Dekker
- Department of Surgery, Reinier de Graaf Gasthuis, Delft, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Warps AK, Detering R, Dekker JWT, Tollenaar RAEM, Tanis PJ. A 10-Year Evaluation of Short-Term Outcomes After Synchronous Colorectal Cancer Surgery: a Dutch Population-Based Study. J Gastrointest Surg 2021; 25:2637-2648. [PMID: 34031855 PMCID: PMC8523499 DOI: 10.1007/s11605-021-05036-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/02/2021] [Accepted: 05/03/2021] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Synchronous colorectal cancer (CRC) has been associated with higher postoperative morbidity and mortality rates compared to solitary CRC. The influence of improved CRC care and introduction of screening on these outcomes remains unknown. This study aimed to evaluate time trends in incidence, population characteristics, and short-term outcomes of synchronous CRC patients at the population level over a 10-year time period. METHODS Data of all patients that underwent resection for primary CRC were extracted from the Dutch ColoRectal Audit (2010-2019). Analyses were stratified for solitary and synchronous colon and rectal cancer. Multilevel logistic regression analyses were used to determine factors associated with pathological and surgical outcomes. RESULTS Among 100,474 patients, 3.1% underwent surgery for synchronous CRC. A screening-related decrease for surgically treated left-sided solitary and synchronous colon cancer and a temporary increase for exclusively right-sided colon cancer were observed. Synchronous CRC patients had higher rates of complicated postoperative course, failure to rescue, and mortality. Bilateral synchronous colon cancer was more often treated with subtotal colectomy (25.4%) and demonstrated higher rates of surgical complications, reinterventions, prolonged hospital stay, and mortality than other synchronous tumor locations. DISCUSSION National bowel screening resulted in contradictory effects on surgical resections for synchronous CRCs depending on sidedness. Bilateral synchronous colon cancer required more often extended resection resulting in significantly worse outcomes than other synchronous tumor locations. Identification of low volume, high complex CRC subpopulations is relevant for individualized care and has implications for case-mix correction and benchmarking in clinical auditing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A. K. Warps
- grid.10419.3d0000000089452978Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands ,grid.511517.6Dutch Institute for Clinical Auditing, Rijnsburgerweg 10, 2333 AA Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - R. Detering
- grid.7177.60000000084992262Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - J. W. T. Dekker
- grid.415868.60000 0004 0624 5690Department of Surgery, Reinier de Graaf Groep, Reinier de Graafweg 5, 2625 AD Delft, The Netherlands
| | - R. A. E. M. Tollenaar
- grid.10419.3d0000000089452978Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands ,grid.511517.6Dutch Institute for Clinical Auditing, Rijnsburgerweg 10, 2333 AA Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - P. J. Tanis
- grid.7177.60000000084992262Department of Surgery, Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Warps AK, de Neree tot Babberich MPM, Dekker E, Wouters MWJM, Dekker JWT, Tollenaar RAEM, Tanis PJ. Interhospital referral of colorectal cancer patients: a Dutch population-based study. Int J Colorectal Dis 2021; 36:1443-1453. [PMID: 33743051 PMCID: PMC8195929 DOI: 10.1007/s00384-021-03881-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/04/2021] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Interhospital referral is a consequence of centralization of complex oncological care but might negatively impact waiting time, a quality indicator in the Netherlands. This study aims to evaluate characteristics and waiting times of patients with primary colorectal cancer who are referred between hospitals. METHODS Data were extracted from the Dutch ColoRectal Audit (2015-2019). Waiting time between first tumor-positive biopsy until first treatment was compared between subgroups stratified for referral status, disease stage, and type of hospital. RESULTS In total, 46,561 patients were included. Patients treated for colon or rectal cancer in secondary care hospitals were referred in 12.2% and 14.7%, respectively. In tertiary care hospitals, corresponding referral rates were 43.8% and 66.4%. Referred patients in tertiary care hospitals were younger, but had a more advanced disease stage, and underwent more often multivisceral resection and simultaneous metastasectomy than non-referred patients in secondary care hospitals (p<0.001). Referred patients were more often treated within national quality standards for waiting time compared to non-referred patients (p<0.001). For referred patients, longer waiting times prior to MDT were observed compared to non-referred patients within each hospital type, although most time was spent post-MDT. CONCLUSION A large proportion of colorectal cancer patients that are treated in tertiary care hospitals are referred from another hospital but mostly treated within standards for waiting time. These patients are younger but often have a more advanced disease. This suggests that these patients are willing to travel more but also reflects successful centralization of complex oncological patients in the Netherlands.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A. K. Warps
- grid.10419.3d0000000089452978Department of Surgery and Biomedical Data Sciences, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333ZA Leiden, Netherlands ,Scientific Bureau, Dutch Institute for Clinical Auditing, Rijnsburgerweg 10, 2333AA Leiden, Netherlands
| | - M. P. M. de Neree tot Babberich
- grid.7177.60000000084992262Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105AZ Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - E. Dekker
- grid.7177.60000000084992262Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105AZ Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - M. W. J. M. Wouters
- grid.10419.3d0000000089452978Department of Surgery and Biomedical Data Sciences, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333ZA Leiden, Netherlands ,Scientific Bureau, Dutch Institute for Clinical Auditing, Rijnsburgerweg 10, 2333AA Leiden, Netherlands ,grid.430814.aDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066CX Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - J. W. T. Dekker
- grid.415868.60000 0004 0624 5690Department of Surgery, Reinier de Graaf Groep, Reinier de Graafweg 5, 2625AD Delft, Netherlands
| | - R. A. E. M. Tollenaar
- grid.10419.3d0000000089452978Department of Surgery and Biomedical Data Sciences, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333ZA Leiden, Netherlands ,Scientific Bureau, Dutch Institute for Clinical Auditing, Rijnsburgerweg 10, 2333AA Leiden, Netherlands
| | - P. J. Tanis
- grid.7177.60000000084992262Department of Surgery, Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105AZ Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Detering R, van Oostendorp SE, Meyer VM, van Dieren S, Bos ACRK, Dekker JWT, Reerink O, van Waesberghe JHTM, Marijnen CAM, Moons LMG, Beets-Tan RGH, Hompes R, van Westreenen HL, Tanis PJ, Tuynman JB. MRI cT1-2 rectal cancer staging accuracy: a population-based study. Br J Surg 2020; 107:1372-1382. [PMID: 32297326 PMCID: PMC7496930 DOI: 10.1002/bjs.11590] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2019] [Revised: 02/05/2020] [Accepted: 02/17/2020] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
Background Adequate MRI‐based staging of early rectal cancers is essential for decision‐making in an era of organ‐conserving treatment approaches. The aim of this population‐based study was to determine the accuracy of routine daily MRI staging of early rectal cancer, whether or not combined with endorectal ultrasonography (ERUS). Methods Patients with cT1–2 rectal cancer who underwent local excision or total mesorectal excision (TME) without downsizing (chemo)radiotherapy between 1 January 2011 and 31 December 2018 were selected from the Dutch ColoRectal Audit. The accuracy of imaging was expressed as sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value. Results Of 7382 registered patients with cT1–2 rectal cancer, 5539 were included (5288 MRI alone, 251 MRI and ERUS; 1059 cT1 and 4480 cT2). Among patients with pT1 tumours, 54·7 per cent (792 of 1448) were overstaged by MRI alone, and 31·0 per cent (36 of 116) by MRI and ERUS. Understaging of pT2 disease occurred in 8·2 per cent (197 of 2388) and 27·9 per cent (31 of 111) respectively. MRI alone overstaged pN0 in 17·3 per cent (570 of 3303) and the PPV for assignment of cN0 category was 76·3 per cent (2733 of 3583). Of 834 patients with pT1 N0 disease, potentially suitable for local excision, tumours in 253 patients (30·3 per cent) were staged correctly as cT1 N0, whereas 484 (58·0 per cent) and 97 (11·6 per cent) were overstaged as cT2 N0 and cT1–2 N1 respectively. Conclusion This Dutch population‐based analysis of patients who underwent local excision or TME surgery for cT1–2 rectal cancer based on preoperative MRI staging revealed substantial overstaging, indicating the weaknesses of MRI and missed opportunities for organ preservation strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R Detering
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - S E van Oostendorp
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, VU University, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - V M Meyer
- Department of Surgery, Zwolle, the Netherlands
| | - S van Dieren
- Clinical Research Unit, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - A C R K Bos
- Department of Research, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - J W T Dekker
- Department of Surgery, Reinier de Graaf Hospital, Delft, the Netherlands
| | - O Reerink
- Department of Radiotherapy, Isala Hospital, Zwolle, the Netherlands
| | | | | | - L M G Moons
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - R G H Beets-Tan
- Department of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - R Hompes
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | - P J Tanis
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - J B Tuynman
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, VU University, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Detering R, Saraste D, de Neree tot Babberich MPM, Dekker JWT, Wouters MWJM, van Geloven AAW, Bemelman WA, Tanis PJ, Martling A, Westerterp M. International evaluation of circumferential resection margins after rectal cancer resection: insights from the Swedish and Dutch audits. Colorectal Dis 2020; 22:416-429. [PMID: 31696599 PMCID: PMC7187294 DOI: 10.1111/codi.14903] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2019] [Accepted: 10/18/2019] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
AIM This study aimed to determine predictive factors for the circumferential resection margin (CRM) within two northern European countries with supposed similarity in providing rectal cancer care. METHOD Data for all patients undergoing rectal resection for clinical tumour node metastasis (TNM) stage I-III rectal cancer were extracted from the Swedish ColoRectal Cancer Registry and the Dutch ColoRectal Audit (2011-2015). Separate analyses were performed for cT1-3 and cT4 stage. Predictive factors for the CRM were determined using univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses. RESULTS A total of 6444 Swedish and 12 089 Dutch patients were analysed. Over time the number of hospitals treating rectal cancer decreased from 52 to 42 in Sweden, and 82 to 79 in the Netherlands. In the Swedish population, proportions of cT4 stage (17% vs 8%), multivisceral resection (14% vs 7%) and abdominoperineal excision (APR) (37% vs 31%) were higher. The overall proportion of patients with a positive CRM (CRM+) was 7.8% in Sweden and 5.4% in the Netherlands. In both populations with cT1-3 stage disease, common independent risk factors for CRM+ were cT3, APR and multivisceral resection. No common risk factors for CRM+ in cT4 stage disease were found. An independent impact of hospital volume on CRM+ could be demonstrated for the cT1-3 Dutch population. CONCLUSION Within two northern European countries with implemented clinical auditing, rectal cancer care might potentially be improved by further optimizing the treatment of distal and locally advanced rectal cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R. Detering
- Department of SurgeryAmsterdam UMCUniversity of AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands,Scientific bureau of the Dutch Institute of Clinical AuditingLeidenThe Netherlands
| | - D. Saraste
- Department of Molecular Medicine and SurgeryKarolinska Institutet,StockholmSweden
| | - M. P. M. de Neree tot Babberich
- Scientific bureau of the Dutch Institute of Clinical AuditingLeidenThe Netherlands,Department of Gastroenterology and HepatologyAmsterdam UMCUniversity of AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| | - J. W. T. Dekker
- Department of SurgeryReinier de Graaf Hospital,DelftThe Netherlands
| | - M. W. J. M. Wouters
- Scientific bureau of the Dutch Institute of Clinical AuditingLeidenThe Netherlands,Department of Surgical OncologyNetherlands Cancer Institute–Antoni van Leeuwenhoek HospitalAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| | | | - W. A. Bemelman
- Department of SurgeryAmsterdam UMCUniversity of AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| | - P. J. Tanis
- Department of SurgeryAmsterdam UMCUniversity of AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| | - A. Martling
- Department of Molecular Medicine and SurgeryKarolinska Institutet,StockholmSweden
| | - M. Westerterp
- Department of Colorectal SurgeryHaaglanden Medical CenterThe HagueThe Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Sparreboom CL, Komen N, Rizopoulos D, Verhaar AP, Dik WA, Wu Z, van Westreenen HL, Doornebosch PG, Dekker JWT, Menon AG, Daams F, Lips D, van Grevenstein WMU, Karsten TM, Bayon Y, Peppelenbosch MP, Wolthuis AM, D'Hoore A, Lange JF. A multicentre cohort study of serum and peritoneal biomarkers to predict anastomotic leakage after rectal cancer resection. Colorectal Dis 2020; 22:36-45. [PMID: 31344302 PMCID: PMC6973162 DOI: 10.1111/codi.14789] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2019] [Accepted: 07/19/2019] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
AIM Anastomotic leakage (AL) is one of the most feared complications after rectal resection. This study aimed to assess a combination of biomarkers for early detection of AL after rectal cancer resection. METHOD This study was an international multicentre prospective cohort study. All patients received a pelvic drain after rectal cancer resection. On the first three postoperative days drain fluid was collected daily and C-reactive protein (CRP) was measured. Matrix metalloproteinase-2 (MMP2), MMP9, glucose, lactate, interleukin 1-beta (IL1β), IL6, IL10, tumour necrosis factor alpha (TNFα), Escherichia coli, Enterococcus faecalis, lipopolysaccharide-binding protein and amylase were measured in the drain fluid. Prediction models for AL were built for each postoperative day using multivariate penalized logistic regression. Model performance was estimated by the c-index for discrimination. The model with the best performance was visualized with a nomogram and calibration was plotted. RESULTS A total of 292 patients were analysed; 38 (13.0%) patients suffered from AL, with a median interval to diagnosis of 6.0 (interquartile ratio 4.0-14.8) days. AL occurred less often after partial than after total mesorectal excision (4.9% vs 15.2%, P = 0.035). Of all patients with AL, 26 (68.4%) required reoperation. AL was more often treated by reoperation in patients without a diverting ileostomy (18/20 vs 8/18, P = 0.03). The prediction model for postoperative day 1 included MMP9, TNFα, diverting ileostomy and surgical technique (c-index = 0.71). The prediction model for postoperative day 2 only included CRP (c-index = 0.69). The prediction model for postoperative day 3 included CRP and MMP9 and obtained the best model performance (c-index = 0.78). CONCLUSION The combination of serum CRP and peritoneal MMP9 may be useful for earlier prediction of AL after rectal cancer resection. In clinical practice, this combination of biomarkers should be interpreted in the clinical context as with any other diagnostic tool.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C. L. Sparreboom
- Department of SurgeryErasmus MC – University Medical CentreRotterdamThe Netherlands
| | - N. Komen
- Department of Abdominal SurgeryUniversity Hospital AntwerpUniversity of AntwerpEdegemBelgium
| | - D. Rizopoulos
- Department of BiostatisticsErasmus MC – University Medical CenterRotterdamThe Netherlands
| | - A. P. Verhaar
- Department of Gastroenterology and HepatologyErasmus MC – University Medical CenterRotterdamThe Netherlands
| | - W. A. Dik
- Department of ImmunologyLaboratory Medical ImmunologyErasmus MC – University Medical CenterRotterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Z. Wu
- Department of SurgeryErasmus MC – University Medical CentreRotterdamThe Netherlands
| | | | - P. G. Doornebosch
- Department of SurgeryIJsselland ZiekenhuisCapelle aan den IjsselThe Netherlands
| | - J. W. T. Dekker
- Department of SurgeryReinier de Graaf GasthuisDelftThe Netherlands
| | - A. G. Menon
- Department of SurgeryIJsselland ZiekenhuisCapelle aan den IjsselThe Netherlands,Department of SurgeryHavenziekenhuisRotterdamThe Netherlands
| | - F. Daams
- Department of SurgeryVU University Medical CenterAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| | - D. Lips
- Department of SurgeryJeroen Bosch ZiekenhuisHertogenboschThe Netherlands
| | | | - T. M. Karsten
- Department of SurgeryOnze Lieve Vrouwe GasthuisAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Y. Bayon
- Sofradim Production, A Medtronic CompanyTrévouxFrance
| | - M. P. Peppelenbosch
- Department of Gastroenterology and HepatologyErasmus MC – University Medical CenterRotterdamThe Netherlands
| | - A. M. Wolthuis
- Department of Abdominal SurgeryUniversity Hospital LeuvenLeuvenBelgium
| | - A. D'Hoore
- Department of Abdominal SurgeryUniversity Hospital LeuvenLeuvenBelgium
| | - J. F. Lange
- Department of SurgeryErasmus MC – University Medical CentreRotterdamThe Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Lambrichts DPV, Bolkenstein HE, van der Does DCHE, Dieleman D, Crolla RMPH, Dekker JWT, van Duijvendijk P, Gerhards MF, Nienhuijs SW, Menon AG, de Graaf EJR, Consten ECJ, Draaisma WA, Broeders IAMJ, Bemelman WA, Lange JF. Multicentre study of non-surgical management of diverticulitis with abscess formation. Br J Surg 2019; 106:458-466. [PMID: 30811050 PMCID: PMC6593757 DOI: 10.1002/bjs.11129] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2018] [Revised: 10/13/2018] [Accepted: 01/10/2019] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
This multicentre retrospective cohort study included 447 patients with Hinchey Ib and II diverticular abscesses, who were treated with antibiotics, with or without percutaneous drainage. Abscesses of 3 and 5 cm in size were at higher risk of short‐term treatment failure and emergency surgery respectively. Initial non‐surgical treatment of Hinchey Ib and II diverticular abscesses was comparable between patients treated with antibiotics only and those who underwent percutaneous drainage in combination with antibiotics, with regard to short‐ and long‐term outcomes.
![]() Most do not need drainage
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D P V Lambrichts
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.,Department of Surgery, Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - H E Bolkenstein
- Department of Surgery, Meander Medical Centre, Amersfoort, the Netherlands
| | | | - D Dieleman
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - R M P H Crolla
- Department of Surgery, Amphia Hospital, Breda, the Netherlands
| | - J W T Dekker
- Department of Surgery, Reinier de Graaf Gasthuis, Delft, the Netherlands
| | | | - M F Gerhards
- Department of Surgery, Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - S W Nienhuijs
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | - A G Menon
- Department of Surgery, Havenziekenhuis, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.,Department of Surgery, IJsselland Hospital, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - E J R de Graaf
- Department of Surgery, IJsselland Hospital, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - E C J Consten
- Department of Surgery, Meander Medical Centre, Amersfoort, the Netherlands
| | - W A Draaisma
- Department of Surgery, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, 's-Hertogenbosch, the Netherlands
| | - I A M J Broeders
- Department of Surgery, Meander Medical Centre, Amersfoort, the Netherlands
| | - W A Bemelman
- Department of Surgery, Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - J F Lange
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.,Department of Surgery, Havenziekenhuis, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.,Department of Surgery, IJsselland Hospital, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Sparreboom CL, Komen N, Rizopoulos D, van Westreenen HL, Doornebosch PG, Dekker JWT, Menon AG, Tuynman JB, Daams F, Lips D, van Grevenstein WMU, Karsten TM, Lange JF, D'Hoore A, Wolthuis AM. Transanal total mesorectal excision: how are we doing so far? Colorectal Dis 2019; 21:767-774. [PMID: 30844130 PMCID: PMC6850385 DOI: 10.1111/codi.14601] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2018] [Accepted: 02/25/2019] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
AIM This subgroup analysis of a prospective multicentre cohort study aims to compare postoperative morbidity between transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) and laparoscopic total mesorectal excision (LaTME). METHOD The study was designed as a subgroup analysis of a prospective multicentre cohort study. Patients undergoing TaTME or LaTME for rectal cancer were selected. All patients were followed up until the first visit to the outpatient clinic after hospital discharge. Postoperative complications were classified according to the Clavien-Dindo classification and the comprehensive complication index (CCI). Propensity score matching was performed. RESULTS In total, 220 patients were selected from the overall prospective multicentre cohort study. After propensity score matching, 48 patients from each group were compared. The median tumour height for TaTME was 10.0 cm (6.0-10.8) and for LaTME was 9.5 cm (7.0-12.0) (P = 0.459). The duration of surgery and anaesthesia were both significantly longer for TaTME (221 vs 180 min, P < 0.001, and 264 vs 217 min, P < 0.001). TaTME was not converted to laparotomy whilst surgery in five patients undergoing LaTME was converted to laparotomy (0.0% vs 10.4%, P = 0.056). No statistically significant differences were observed for Clavien-Dindo classification, CCI, readmissions, reoperations and mortality. CONCLUSION The study showed that TaTME is a safe and feasible approach for rectal cancer resection. This new technique obtained similar postoperative morbidity to LaTME.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C. L. Sparreboom
- Department of SurgeryErasmus University Medical CenterRotterdamThe Netherlands
| | - N. Komen
- Department of SurgeryUniversity Hospital AntwerpEdegemBelgium
| | - D. Rizopoulos
- Department of BiostatisticsErasmus University Medical CenterRotterdamThe Netherlands
| | | | - P. G. Doornebosch
- Department of SurgeryIJsselland ZiekenhuisCapelle aan den IJsselThe Netherlands
| | - J. W. T. Dekker
- Department of SurgeryReinier de Graaf GasthuisDelftThe Netherlands
| | - A. G. Menon
- Department of SurgeryIJsselland ZiekenhuisCapelle aan den IJsselThe Netherlands
| | - J. B. Tuynman
- Department of SurgeryVU University Medical CenterAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| | - F. Daams
- Department of SurgeryVU University Medical CenterAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| | - D. Lips
- Department of SurgeryJeroen Bosch ZiekenhuisHertogenboschThe Netherlands
| | | | - T. M. Karsten
- Department of SurgeryOnze Lieve Vrouwe GasthuisAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| | - J. F. Lange
- Department of SurgeryErasmus University Medical CenterRotterdamThe Netherlands
| | - A. D'Hoore
- Departmenf of Abdominal SurgeryUniversity Hospital LeuvenLeuvenBelgium
| | - A. M. Wolthuis
- Departmenf of Abdominal SurgeryUniversity Hospital LeuvenLeuvenBelgium
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Claassen YHM, Bastiaannet E, van Eycken E, Van Damme N, Martling A, Johansson R, Iversen LH, Ingeholm P, Lemmens VEPP, Liefers GJ, Holman FA, Dekker JWT, Portielje JEA, Rutten HJ, van de Velde CJH. Time trends of short-term mortality for octogenarians undergoing a colorectal resection in North Europe. Eur J Surg Oncol 2019; 45:1396-1402. [PMID: 31003722 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2019.03.041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2019] [Revised: 03/10/2019] [Accepted: 03/28/2019] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Decreased cancer specific survival in older colorectal patients is mainly due to mortality in the first year, emphasizing the importance of the first postoperative year. This study aims to gain an overview and time trends of short-term mortality in octogenarians (≥80 years) with colorectal cancer across four North European countries. METHODS Patients of 80 years or older, operated for colorectal cancer (stage I-III) between 2005 and 2014, were included. Population-based cohorts from Belgium, Denmark, the Netherlands, and Sweden were collected. Separately for colon- and rectal cancer, 30-day, 90-day, one-year, and excess one-year mortality were calculated. Also, short-term mortality over three time periods (2005-2008, 2009-2011, 2012-2014) was analyzed. RESULTS In total, 35,158 colon cancer patients and 10,144 rectal cancer patients were included. For colon cancer, 90-day mortality rate was highest in Denmark (15%) and lowest in Sweden (8%). For rectal cancer, 90-day mortality rate was highest in Belgium (11%) and lowest in Sweden (7%). One-year excess mortality rate of colon cancer patients decreased from 2005 to 2008 to 2012-2014 for all countries (Belgium: 17%-11%, Denmark: 21%-15%, the Netherlands: 18%-10%, and Sweden: 10%-8%). For rectal cancer, from 2005 to 2008 to 2012-2014 one-year excess mortality rate decreased in the Netherlands from 16% to 7% and Sweden: 8%-2%). CONCLUSIONS Short-term mortality rates were high in octogenarians operated for colorectal cancer. Short-term mortality rates differ across four North European countries, but decreased over time for both colon and rectal cancer patients in all countries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Y H M Claassen
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, the Netherlands.
| | - E Bastiaannet
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, the Netherlands; Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | | | | | - A Martling
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - R Johansson
- Department of Radiation Science, Oncology, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
| | - L H Iversen
- Department of Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark; Danish Colorectal Cancer Group (DCCG.dk), Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - P Ingeholm
- Department of Pathology, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - V E P P Lemmens
- Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization, Utrecht, the Netherlands; Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - G J Liefers
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, the Netherlands
| | - F A Holman
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, the Netherlands
| | - J W T Dekker
- Department of Surgery, Reinier de Graaf Hospital, Delft, the Netherlands
| | - J E A Portielje
- Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - H J Rutten
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Netherlands; GROW: School of Oncology and Developmental Biology, University of Maastricht, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - C J H van de Velde
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Souwer ETD, Hultink D, Bastiaannet E, Hamaker ME, Schiphorst A, Pronk A, van der Bol JM, Steup WH, Dekker JWT, Portielje JEA, van den Bos F. The Prognostic Value of a Geriatric Risk Score for Older Patients with Colorectal Cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 2018; 26:71-78. [PMID: 30362061 PMCID: PMC6338720 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-018-6867-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2018] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION VMS is a Dutch risk assessment tool for hospitalized older adults that includes a short evaluation of four geriatric domains: risk for delirium, risk for undernutrition, risk for physical impairments, and fall risk. We investigated whether the information derived from this tool has prognostic value for outcomes of colorectal surgery. METHODS All consecutive patients over age 70 years who underwent elective colorectal cancer surgery in three Dutch hospitals (2014-2016) were studied. The presence of risk was scored prior to surgery and per geriatric domain as either 0 (risk absent) or 1 (risk present). The total number of geriatric risk factors was summed. The primary outcome was long-term survival. Secondary outcomes were postoperative complications, including delirium. Cox proportional hazards models were used to evaluate the sumscore and risk factors associated with overall survival. RESULTS Five hundred fifty patients were included. Median age was 76.5 years, and median follow-up was 870 days. Patients with intermediate (1-2) or high (3-4) sumscore were independently associated with lower overall survival, with hazard ratio (HR) of 1.9 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.1-3.5; p = 0.03] and 8.7 (95% CI 4.0-19.2; p < 0.001), respectively. Sumscores were also associated with postoperative complications (intermediate sumscore OR 1.8; 95% CI 1.2-2.7; high sumscore OR 2.4; 95% CI 1.02-5.5). CONCLUSIONS This easy-to-use geriatric sumscore has strong associations with long-term outcome and morbidity after colorectal cancer surgery. This information may be included in risk models for morbidity and mortality and can be used in shared decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E T D Souwer
- Department of Internal Medicine, Haga Hospital, PO Box 40551, 2504 LN, The Hague, The Netherlands.
| | - D Hultink
- Department of Internal Medicine, Haga Hospital, PO Box 40551, 2504 LN, The Hague, The Netherlands
| | - E Bastiaannet
- Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.,Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - M E Hamaker
- Department of Geriatrics, Diakonessenhuis, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - A Schiphorst
- Department of Surgery, Diakonessenhuis, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - A Pronk
- Department of Surgery, Diakonessenhuis, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - J M van der Bol
- Department of Geriatrics, Reinier de Graaf Gasthuis, Delft, The Netherlands
| | - W H Steup
- Department of Surgery, Haga Hospital, The Hague, The Netherlands
| | - J W T Dekker
- Department of Surgery, Reinier de Graaf Gasthuis, Delft, The Netherlands
| | - J E A Portielje
- Department of Internal Medicine, Haga Hospital, PO Box 40551, 2504 LN, The Hague, The Netherlands.,Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - F van den Bos
- Department of Internal Medicine, Haga Hospital, PO Box 40551, 2504 LN, The Hague, The Netherlands.,Department of Geriatrics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Hupkens BJP, Breukink SO, Olde Reuver Of Briel C, Tanis PJ, de Noo ME, van Duijvendijk P, van Westreenen HL, Dekker JWT, Chen TYT, Juul T. Dutch validation of the low anterior resection syndrome score. Colorectal Dis 2018; 20:881-887. [PMID: 29679514 DOI: 10.1111/codi.14228] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2017] [Accepted: 03/26/2018] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
AIM The aim of this study was to validate the Dutch translation of the low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) score in a population of Dutch rectal cancer patients. METHOD Patients who underwent surgery for rectal cancer received the LARS score questionnaire, a single quality of life (QoL) category question and the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30 questionnaire. A subgroup of patients received the LARS score twice to assess the test-retest reliability. RESULTS A total of 165 patients were included in the analysis, identified in six Dutch centres. The response rate was 62.0%. The percentage of patients who reported 'major LARS' was 59.4%. There was a high proportion of patients with a perfect or moderate fit between the QoL category question and the LARS score, showing a good convergent validity. The LARS score was able to discriminate between patients with or without neoadjuvant radiotherapy (P = 0.003), between total and partial mesorectal excision (P = 0.008) and between age groups (P = 0.039). There was a statistically significant association between a higher LARS score and an impaired function on the global QoL subscale and the physical, role, emotional and social functioning subscales of the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire. The test-retest reliability of the LARS score was good, with an interclass correlation coefficient of 0.79. CONCLUSION The good psychometric properties of the Dutch version of the LARS score are comparable overall to the earlier validations in other countries. Therefore, the Dutch translation can be considered to be a valid tool for assessing LARS in Dutch rectal cancer patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B J P Hupkens
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - S O Breukink
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - C Olde Reuver Of Briel
- Dutch Institute for Clinical Auditing, Leiden, The Netherlands.,Medical Research Data Management, Deventer, The Netherlands
| | - P J Tanis
- Department of Surgery, Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - M E de Noo
- Department of Surgery, Deventer Hospital, Deventer, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - J W T Dekker
- Department of Surgery, Reinier de Graaf Hospital, Delft, The Netherlands
| | - T Y T Chen
- Department of Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - T Juul
- Department of Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Breugom AJ, Bastiaannet E, Dekker JWT, Wouters MWJM, van de Velde CJH, Liefers GJ. Decrease in 30-day and one-year mortality over time in patients aged ≥75 years with stage I-III colon cancer: A population-based study. Eur J Surg Oncol 2018; 44:1889-1893. [PMID: 30262327 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2018.08.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2018] [Revised: 08/03/2018] [Accepted: 08/17/2018] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Monitoring time trends of cancer mortality is essential. Thirty-day mortality is an important surgical outcome measure, though postoperative mortality exceeds to one year after surgery in patients with colorectal cancer. The aim of this nationwide observational study was to assess changes over time in 30-day and one-year mortality in patients with stage I-III colorectal cancer. METHODS All surgically treated patients with stage I-III colorectal cancer, diagnosed between 2009 and 2013 were selected from the Netherlands Cancer Registry. Changes in 30-day and one-year mortality were assessed using logistic regression by tumour localisation (colon, rectum) and age group (<75 years, ≥75 years). RESULTS Overall, 41,186 patients were included. Among patients with colon cancer ≥75 years, 30-day mortality decreased from 8.3% in 2009 to 6.2% in 2013 (p-value for trend = 0.011), and one-year mortality from 18.5% in 2009 to 15.0% in 2013 (p-value for trend = 0.007). No significant differences in mortality over time were observed for patients <75 years with colon cancer and for patients with rectal cancer. CONCLUSION Thirty-day and one-year mortality decreased over time in patients ≥75 years with stage I-III colon cancer, though the absolute decrease is small. However, 30-day mortality and in particular the one-year mortality are both still high in older patients with colorectal cancer and will need to be focused on to further improve outcomes for these patient subgroups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A J Breugom
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - E Bastiaannet
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands; Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - J W T Dekker
- Department of Surgery, Reinier de Graaf Gasthuis, Delft, The Netherlands
| | - M W J M Wouters
- Department of Surgery, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - C J H van de Velde
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - G J Liefers
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Coebergh van den Braak RRJ, van Rijssen LB, van Kleef JJ, Vink GR, Berbee M, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Bloemendal HJ, Bruno MJ, Burgmans MC, Busch ORC, Coene PPLO, Coupé VMH, Dekker JWT, van Eijck CHJ, Elferink MAG, Erdkamp FLG, van Grevenstein WMU, de Groot JWB, van Grieken NCT, de Hingh IHJT, Hulshof MCCM, Ijzermans JNM, Kwakkenbos L, Lemmens VEPP, Los M, Meijer GA, Molenaar IQ, Nieuwenhuijzen GAP, de Noo ME, van de Poll-Franse LV, Punt CJA, Rietbroek RC, Roeloffzen WWH, Rozema T, Ruurda JP, van Sandick JW, Schiphorst AHW, Schipper H, Siersema PD, Slingerland M, Sommeijer DW, Spaander MCW, Sprangers MAG, Stockmann HBAC, Strijker M, van Tienhoven G, Timmermans LM, Tjin-a-Ton MLR, van der Velden AMT, Verhaar MJ, Verkooijen HM, Vles WJ, de Vos-Geelen JMPGM, Wilmink JW, Zimmerman DDE, van Oijen MGH, Koopman M, Besselink MGH, van Laarhoven HWM. Nationwide comprehensive gastro-intestinal cancer cohorts: the 3P initiative. Acta Oncol 2018; 57:195-202. [PMID: 28723307 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2017.1346381] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The increasing sub-classification of cancer patients due to more detailed molecular classification of tumors, and limitations of current trial designs, require innovative research designs. We present the design, governance and current standing of three comprehensive nationwide cohorts including pancreatic, esophageal/gastric, and colorectal cancer patients (NCT02070146). Multidisciplinary collection of clinical data, tumor tissue, blood samples, and patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures with a nationwide coverage, provides the infrastructure for future and novel trial designs and facilitates research to improve outcomes of gastrointestinal cancer patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS All patients aged ≥18 years with pancreatic, esophageal/gastric or colorectal cancer are eligible. Patients provide informed consent for: (1) reuse of clinical data; (2) biobanking of primary tumor tissue; (3) collection of blood samples; (4) to be informed about relevant newly identified genomic aberrations; (5) collection of longitudinal PROs; and (6) to receive information on new interventional studies and possible participation in cohort multiple randomized controlled trials (cmRCT) in the future. RESULTS In 2015, clinical data of 21,758 newly diagnosed patients were collected in the Netherlands Cancer Registry. Additional clinical data on the surgical procedures were registered in surgical audits for 13,845 patients. Within the first two years, tumor tissue and blood samples were obtained from 1507 patients; during this period, 1180 patients were included in the PRO registry. Response rate for PROs was 90%. The consent rate to receive information on new interventional studies and possible participation in cmRCTs in the future was >85%. The number of hospitals participating in the cohorts is steadily increasing. CONCLUSION A comprehensive nationwide multidisciplinary gastrointestinal cancer cohort is feasible and surpasses the limitations of classical study designs. With this initiative, novel and innovative studies can be performed in an efficient, safe, and comprehensive setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - L. B. van Rijssen
- Department of Surgery, Academic Medical Center, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - J. J. van Kleef
- Department of Medical Oncology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - G. R. Vink
- Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - M. Berbee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Maastro Clinic, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | | | - H. J. Bloemendal
- Department of Medical Oncology, Meander Medisch Centrum, Amersfoort, The Netherlands
| | - M. J. Bruno
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - M. C. Burgmans
- Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - O. R. C. Busch
- Department of Surgery, Academic Medical Center, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - P. P. L. O. Coene
- Department of Surgery, Maasstad Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - V. M. H. Coupé
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - J. W. T. Dekker
- Department of Surgery, Reinier de Graaf Hospital, Delft, The Netherlands
| | - C. H. J. van Eijck
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - M. A. G. Elferink
- Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - F. L. G. Erdkamp
- Department of Medical Oncology, Zuyderland Medisch Centrum, Heerlen, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - N. C. T. van Grieken
- Department of Pathology, VU University Medical Center, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - M. C. C. M. Hulshof
- Department of Radiotherapy, Academic Medical Center, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - J. N. M. Ijzermans
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - M. Los
- Department of Medical Oncology, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| | - G. A. Meijer
- Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - I. Q. Molenaar
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | | - M. E. de Noo
- Department of Surgery, Deventer Hospital, Deventer, The Netherlands
| | | | - C. J. A. Punt
- Department of Medical Oncology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - R. C. Rietbroek
- Department of Medical Oncology, Rode Kruis Hospital, Beverwijk, The Netherlands
| | - W. W. H. Roeloffzen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Treant Zorggroep, Hoogeveen, The Netherlands
| | - T. Rozema
- Department of Radiotherapy, Instituut Verbeeten, Tilburg, The Netherlands
| | - J. P. Ruurda
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - J. W. van Sandick
- Department of Surgery, Netherlands Cancer Institute – Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - H. Schipper
- Stichting voor Patiënten met Kanker aan het Spijsverteringskanaal (SPKS), Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - P. D. Siersema
- Department of Gastroenterology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - M. Slingerland
- Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - D. W. Sommeijer
- Department of Medical Oncology, Flevoziekenhuis, Almere, The Netherlands
| | - M. C. W. Spaander
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - M. A. G. Sprangers
- Department of Medical Psychology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - M. Strijker
- Department of Surgery, Academic Medical Center, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - G. van Tienhoven
- Department of Radiotherapy, Academic Medical Center, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - L. M. Timmermans
- Stichting voor Patiënten met Kanker aan het Spijsverteringskanaal (SPKS), Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - M. L. R. Tjin-a-Ton
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Rivierenland, Tiel, The Netherlands
| | | | - M. J. Verhaar
- Department of Medical Oncology, Zuwe Hofpoort Hospital, Woerden, The Netherlands
| | - H. M. Verkooijen
- Department of Epidemiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - W. J. Vles
- Department of Surgery, Ikazia Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - J. W. Wilmink
- Department of Medical Oncology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - D. D. E. Zimmerman
- Department of Surgery, Elisabeth-Tweesteden Hospital, Tilburg, The Netherlands
| | - M. G. H. van Oijen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - M. Koopman
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - M. G. H. Besselink
- Department of Surgery, Academic Medical Center, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Wilson MJ, Dekker JWT, Harlaar JJ, Jeekel J, Schipperus M, Zwaginga JJ. The role of preoperative iron deficiency in colorectal cancer patients: prevalence and treatment. Int J Colorectal Dis 2017; 32:1617-1624. [PMID: 28889320 PMCID: PMC5635103 DOI: 10.1007/s00384-017-2898-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/30/2017] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In preoperative blood management of colorectal cancer patients, intravenous iron therapy is increasingly used to treat anaemia and prevent red blood cell transfusions. However, while iron deficiency is the most common cause of anaemia, little is known about the prevalence and namely type of iron deficiency in this population, whereas both types of iron deficiency (i.e. absolute and functional iron deficiency) are recommended to be treated differently by international cancer guidelines. OBJECTIVE The aim of present study is to investigate the prevalence and namely type of iron deficiency in colorectal cancer patients, and to assess its clinical relevance. METHODS Preoperative iron status, clinical parameters (i.e. age, ASA classification, tumour location, tumour stage) and postoperative complications were retrospectively collected for all newly diagnosed colorectal cancer patients in our institution over a 3-year period. RESULTS Iron deficiency was observed in 163 (48.1%) of 339 patients. Of these iron-deficient patients, 3.7% had an isolated absolute iron deficiency (AID) and 15.3% a functional iron deficiency (FID), while the rest had a combination of AID and FID. Anaemia was present in 66.1% of iron-deficient patients. Iron deficiency was significantly associated with an increased postoperative complication rate (univariable OR 1.94, p = 0.03, multivariable OR 1.84, p = 0.07), with right-sided tumours (p < 0.001), high ASA classification (p = 0.002), advanced tumour stage (p = 0.01) and advanced age (p = 0.04). In comparing clinical parameters between patients with AID and FID, advanced age was significantly associated with FID (p = 0.03), and the presence of anaemia with AID (p = 0.02). CONCLUSION In preoperative colorectal cancer patients, there is a high prevalence of iron deficiency, including a high percentage of patients with-a component of-functional iron deficiency, associated with the increased postoperative complication rate. As both types of iron deficiency require a different treatment strategy, our results illustrate the therapeutic potential of especially intravenous iron supplementation in patients with severe iron deficiency and stress the urgency of routinely monitoring preoperative iron status and differentiation between types of iron deficiency. As iron therapy may also be potentially harmful in respect to stimulation of tumour growth, future clinical trials assessing the long-term effect of iron therapy are necessary.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M J Wilson
- TRIP Hemovigilance and Biovigilance Office, Leiden, the Netherlands.
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - J W T Dekker
- Department of Surgery, Reinier de Graaf Hospital, Delft, the Netherlands
| | - J J Harlaar
- Department of Surgery, Westfriesgasthuis Hoorn, Hoorn, the Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, VU Medical Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - J Jeekel
- Department of Neuroscience, Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - M Schipperus
- TRIP Hemovigilance and Biovigilance Office, Leiden, the Netherlands
- Department of Hematology, Haga Teaching Hospital, The Hague, the Netherlands
| | - J J Zwaginga
- Sanquin Research, Center for Clinical Transfusion Research, Leiden, the Netherlands
- Department of Immunohematology and Blood Transfusion, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Breugom AJ, van Dongen DT, Bastiaannet E, Dekker FW, van der Geest LGM, Liefers GJ, Marinelli AWKS, Mesker WE, Portielje JEA, Steup WH, Tseng LNL, van de Velde CJH, Dekker JWT. Association Between the Most Frequent Complications After Surgery for Stage I–III Colon Cancer and Short-Term Survival, Long-Term Survival, and Recurrences. Ann Surg Oncol 2016; 23:2858-65. [DOI: 10.1245/s10434-016-5226-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2015] [Indexed: 01/26/2023]
|
23
|
Dekker JWT, Gooiker GA, Bastiaannet E, van den Broek CBM, van der Geest LGM, van de Velde CJ, Tollenaar RAEM, Liefers GJ. Cause of death the first year after curative colorectal cancer surgery; a prolonged impact of the surgery in elderly colorectal cancer patients. Eur J Surg Oncol 2014; 40:1481-7. [PMID: 24985723 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2014.05.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 77] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2014] [Revised: 04/06/2014] [Accepted: 05/13/2014] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The 1-year mortality after colorectal cancer surgery is high and explains age related differences in colorectal cancer survival. To gain better insight in its etiology, cause of death for these patients was studied. METHODS All 1924 patients who had a resection for stage I-III colorectal cancer from 2006 to 2008 in the Western region of the Netherlands were identified. Data were merged with cause of death data from the Central Bureau of Statistics Netherlands. To calculate excess mortality as compared to the general population, national data were used. RESULTS Overall 13.2% of patients died within the first postoperative year. One-year mortality increased with age. It was as high as 43% in elderly patients that underwent emergency surgery. In 75% of patients, death was attributed to the colorectal cancer. In 25% of all patients, registered deaths were attributed to postoperative complications. Elderly patients with comorbidity more frequently died due to complications (p < 0.01). Death of other causes was similar to background mortality according to age group. CONCLUSION In the presently studied cohort of patients that died within one year of surgery, cause of death was predominantly attributed to colorectal cancer. However, because it is not to be expected that in this cohort the number of deaths from recurrences is very high, the excess 1-year mortality indicates a prolonged impact of the surgery, especially in elderly patients. Therefore, in these patients we should focus on limiting the physiological impact of the surgery and be more involved in the post-hospital period.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J W T Dekker
- Leiden University Medical Center, Department of Surgery, Leiden, The Netherlands; Reinier de Graaf Gasthuis, Department of Surgery, Delft, The Netherlands.
| | - G A Gooiker
- Leiden University Medical Center, Department of Surgery, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - E Bastiaannet
- Leiden University Medical Center, Department of Surgery, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - C B M van den Broek
- Leiden University Medical Center, Department of Surgery, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - L G M van der Geest
- Comprehensive Cancer Centre the Netherlands (CCCNL), Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - C J van de Velde
- Leiden University Medical Center, Department of Surgery, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - R A E M Tollenaar
- Leiden University Medical Center, Department of Surgery, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - G J Liefers
- Leiden University Medical Center, Department of Surgery, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Snijders HS, Bakker IS, Dekker JWT, Vermeer TA, Consten ECJ, Hoff C, Klaase JM, Havenga K, Tollenaar RAEM, Wiggers T. High 1-year complication rate after anterior resection for rectal cancer. J Gastrointest Surg 2014; 18:831-8. [PMID: 24249050 DOI: 10.1007/s11605-013-2381-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2013] [Accepted: 10/01/2013] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Surgical options after anterior resection for rectal cancer include a primary anastomosis, anastomosis with a defunctioning stoma, and an end colostomy. This study describes short-term and 1-year outcomes of these different surgical strategies. METHODS Patients undergoing surgical resection for primary mid and high rectal cancer were retrospectively studied in seven Dutch hospitals with 1-year follow-up. Short-term endpoints were postoperative complications, re-interventions, prolonged hospital stay, and mortality. One-year endpoints were unplanned readmissions and re-interventions, presence of stoma, and mortality. RESULTS Nineteen percent of 388 included patients received a primary anastomosis, 55% an anastomosis with defunctioning stoma, and 27% an end colostomy. Short-term anastomotic leakage was 10% in patients with a primary anastomosis vs. 7% with a defunctioning stoma (P = 0.46). An end colostomy was associated with less severe re-interventions. One-year outcomes showed low morbidity and mortality rates in patients with an anastomosis. Patients with a defunctioning stoma had high (18%) readmissions and re-intervention (12%) rates, mostly due to anastomotic leakage. An end colostomy was associated with unplanned re-interventions due to stoma/abscess problems. During follow-up, there was a 30% increase in patients with an end colostomy. CONCLUSIONS This study showed a high 1-year morbidity rate after anterior resection for rectal cancer. A defunctioning stoma was associated with a high risk for late complications including anastomotic leakage. An end colostomy is a safe alternative to prevent anastomotic leakage, but stomal problems cannot be ignored. Selecting low-risk patients for an anastomosis may lead to favorable short- and 1-year outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H S Snijders
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Centre, P.O. Box 9600, 2300, RC, Leiden, The Netherlands,
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Bakker IS, Snijders HS, Wouters MW, Havenga K, Tollenaar RAEM, Wiggers T, Dekker JWT. High complication rate after low anterior resection for mid and high rectal cancer; results of a population-based study. Eur J Surg Oncol 2014; 40:692-8. [PMID: 24655803 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2014.02.234] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2013] [Revised: 01/17/2014] [Accepted: 02/18/2014] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Surgical resection is the cornerstone of treatment for rectal cancer patients. Treatment options consist of a primary anastomosis, anastomosis with defunctioning stoma or end-colostomy with closure of the distal rectal stump. This study aimed to compare postoperative outcome of these three surgical options. METHODS Data was derived from the national database of the Dutch Surgical Colorectal Audit. Mid and high rectal cancer patients who underwent rectal cancer resection between January 2011 and December 2012 were included. Endpoints were postoperative complications including anastomotic leakage, reinterventions, hospital stay and mortality within 30 days postoperative. RESULTS In total, 2585 patients were included. Twenty-five per cent of all patients received a primary anastomosis; 51% an anastomosis with defunctioning stoma, and 24% an end-colostomy. More than one third of patients developed postoperative complications, the lowest rate being in the primary anastomosis group. Anastomotic leakage rates were 12% in patients with a primary anastomosis, and 9% in patients with an anastomosis with defunctioning stoma (p < 0.05). Multivariate analysis showed more postoperative complications, prolonged hospital stay, and increased mortality rates in patients with a defunctioning stoma or end-colostomy. The latter had proportionally less invasive reinterventions when compared to the other two groups. CONCLUSIONS Patients with a primary anastomosis had the best postoperative outcome. A defunctioning stoma leads to a lower anastomotic leakage rate, though is associated with higher rates of complications, prolonged hospital stay and mortality. The decision to create a defunctioning stoma should be focus of future studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- I S Bakker
- University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Abdominal Surgery, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
| | - H S Snijders
- Leiden University Medical Center, Department of Surgery, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - M W Wouters
- Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Department of Surgical Oncology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - K Havenga
- University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Abdominal Surgery, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - R A E M Tollenaar
- Leiden University Medical Center, Department of Surgery, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - T Wiggers
- University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Abdominal Surgery, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - J W T Dekker
- Reinier de Graaf Hospital, Department of Surgery, Delft, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Bos MMEM, Bakhshi-Raiez F, Dekker JWT, de Keizer NF, de Jonge E. Outcomes of intensive care unit admissions after elective cancer surgery. Eur J Surg Oncol 2013; 39:584-92. [PMID: 23490335 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2013.02.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2012] [Revised: 01/12/2013] [Accepted: 02/06/2013] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Postoperative care for major elective cancer surgery is frequently provided on the Intensive Care Unit (ICU). OBJECTIVE To analyze the characteristics and outcome of patients after ICU admission following elective surgery for different cancer diagnoses. METHODS We analyzed all ICU admissions following elective cancer surgery in the Netherlands collected in the National Intensive Care Evaluation registry between January 2007 and January 2012. RESULTS 28,973 patients (9.0% of all ICU admissions; 40% female) were admitted to the ICU after elective cancer surgery. Of these admissions 77% were planned; in 23% of cases the decision for ICU admission was made during or directly after surgery. The most frequent malignancies were colorectal cancer (25.6%), lung cancer (18.5%) and tumors of the central nervous system (14.3%). Mechanical ventilation was necessary in 24.8% of all patients, most frequently after surgery for esophageal (62.5%) and head and neck cancer (50.2%); 20.7% of patients were treated with vasopressors in the acute postoperative phase, in particular after surgery for esophageal cancer (41.8%). The median length of stay on the ICU was 0.9 days (interquartile ranges [IQR] 0.8-1.5); surgery for esophageal cancer was associated with the longest ICU length of stay (median 2.0 days) with the largest variation (IQR 1.0-4.8 days). ICU mortality was 1.4%; surgery for gastrointestinal cancer was associated with the highest ICU mortality (colorectal cancer 2.2%, pancreatico-cholangiocarcinoma 2.0%). CONCLUSION Elective cancer surgery represents a significant part of all ICU admissions, with a short length of stay and low mortality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M M E M Bos
- Reinier de Graaf Hospital, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, Delft, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Dekker JWT, van den Broek CBM, Bastiaannet E, van de Geest LGM, Tollenaar RAEM, Liefers GJ. Importance of the first postoperative year in the prognosis of elderly colorectal cancer patients. Ann Surg Oncol 2011; 18:1533-9. [PMID: 21445672 PMCID: PMC3087879 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-011-1671-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 140] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2010] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Background Elderly colorectal cancer patients have worse prognosis than younger patients. Age-related survival differences may be cancer or treatment related, but also due to death from other causes. This study aims to compare population-based survival data for young (<65 years), aged (65–74 years), and elderly (≥75 years) colorectal cancer patients. Methods All patients operated for stage I–III colorectal cancer between 1991 and 2005 in the western region of The Netherlands were included. Crude survival, relative survival, and conditional relative survival curves, under the condition of surviving 1 year, were made for colon and rectal cancer patients separately. Furthermore, 30-day, 1-year, and 1-year excess mortality data were compared. Results A total of 9,397 stage I–III colorectal cancer patients were included in this study. Crude survival curves showed clear survival differences between the age groups. These age-related differences were less prominent in relative survival and disappeared in conditional relative survival (CRS). Only in stage III disease did elderly patients have worse CRS than young patients. Furthermore, significant age-related differences in 30-day and 1-year excess mortality were found. Thirty-day mortality vastly underestimated 1-year mortality for all age groups. Conclusions Elderly colorectal cancer patients who survive the first year have the same cancer-related survival as younger patients. Therefore, decreased survival in the elderly is mainly due to differences in early mortality. Treatment of elderly colorectal cancer patients should focus on perioperative care and the first postoperative year.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J W T Dekker
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
Boers KE, Dekker JWT, Yedema CA. [Diagnostic image (98). A woman with a vanished intra-uterine device]. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 2002; 146:1412. [PMID: 12174435] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/26/2023]
Abstract
A 36-year-old woman suffered from abdominal pain immediately after placement of an intra-uterine device (IUD). Abdominal X-ray revealed that the IUD had perforated the uterus and lay in the peritoneal cavity.
Collapse
|