1
|
Bakkers C, Rovers KP, Rijken A, Simkens GAAM, Bonhof CS, Nienhuijs SW, Burger JWA, Creemers GJM, Brandt-Kerkhof ARM, Tuynman JB, Aalbers AGJ, Wiezer MJ, de Reuver PR, van Grevenstein WMU, Hemmer PHJ, Punt CJA, Tanis PJ, Mols F, de Hingh IHJT. Perioperative Systemic Therapy Versus Cytoreductive Surgery and HIPEC Alone for Resectable Colorectal Peritoneal Metastases: Patient-Reported Outcomes of a Randomized Phase II Trial. Ann Surg Oncol 2023; 30:2678-2688. [PMID: 36754943 PMCID: PMC10085918 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-023-13116-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2021] [Accepted: 01/02/2023] [Indexed: 02/10/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND As part of a randomized phase II trial in patients with isolated resectable colorectal peritoneal metastases (CPMs), the present study compared patient-reported outcomes (PROs) of patients treated with perioperative systemic therapy versus cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS-HIPEC) alone. Also, PROs of patients receiving perioperative systemic therapy were explored. PATIENTS AND METHODS Eligible patients were randomized to perioperative systemic therapy (experimental) or CRS-HIPEC alone (control). PROs were assessed using EORTC QLQ-C30, QLQ-CR29, and EQ-5D-5L questionnaires at baseline, after neoadjuvant treatment (experimental), and at 3 and 6 months postoperatively. Linear mixed modeling was used to compare five predefined PROs (visual analog scale, global health status, physical functioning, fatigue, C30 summary score) between arms and to longitudinally analyze PROs in the experimental arm. RESULTS Of 79 analyzed patients, 37 (47%) received perioperative systemic therapy. All predefined PROs were comparable between arms at all timepoints and returned to baseline at 3 or 6 months postoperatively. The experimental arm had worsening of fatigue [mean difference (MD) + 14, p = 0.001], loss of appetite (MD + 15, p = 0.003), hair loss (MD + 18, p < 0.001), and loss of taste (MD + 27, p < 0.001) after neoadjuvant treatment. Except for loss of appetite, these PROs returned to baseline at 3 or 6 months postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS In patients with resectable CPM randomized to perioperative systemic therapy or CRS-HIPEC alone, PROs were comparable between arms and returned to baseline postoperatively. Together with the trial's previously reported feasibility and safety data, these findings show acceptable tolerability of perioperative systemic therapy in this setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Bakkers
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Cancer Institute, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - K P Rovers
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Cancer Institute, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - A Rijken
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Cancer Institute, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - G A A M Simkens
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Cancer Institute, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - C S Bonhof
- Center of Research on Psychological and Somatic Disorders, Department of Medical and Clinical Psychology, Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands.,Department of Research, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization (IKNL), Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - S W Nienhuijs
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Cancer Institute, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - J W A Burger
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Cancer Institute, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - G J M Creemers
- Department of Medical Oncology, Catharina Cancer Institute, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - A R M Brandt-Kerkhof
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - J B Tuynman
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, VUMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - A G J Aalbers
- Department of Surgery, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - M J Wiezer
- Department of Surgery, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| | - P R de Reuver
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | | | - P H J Hemmer
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - C J A Punt
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - P J Tanis
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - F Mols
- Center of Research on Psychological and Somatic Disorders, Department of Medical and Clinical Psychology, Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands.,Department of Research, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization (IKNL), Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - I H J T de Hingh
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Cancer Institute, Eindhoven, The Netherlands. .,GROW - School for Oncology and Development Biology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Hoek VT, Edomskis PP, Stark PW, Lambrichts DPV, Draaisma WA, Consten ECJ, Lange JF, Bemelman WA, Hop WC, Opmeer BC, Reitsma JB, Scholte RA, Waltmann EWH, Legemate A, Bartelsman JF, Meijer DW, de Brouwer M, van Dalen J, Durbridge M, Geerdink M, Ilbrink GJ, Mehmedovic S, Middelhoek P, Boom MJ, Consten ECJ, van der Bilt JDW, van Olden GDJ, Stam MAW, Verweij MS, Vennix S, Musters GD, Swank HA, Boermeester MA, Busch ORC, Buskens CJ, El-Massoudi Y, Kluit AB, van Rossem CC, Schijven MP, Tanis PJ, Unlu C, van Dieren S, Gerhards MF, Karsten TM, de Nes LC, Rijna H, van Wagensveld BA, Koff eman GI, Steller EP, Tuynman JB, Bruin SC, van der Peet DL, Blanken-Peeters CFJM, Cense HA, Jutte E, Crolla RMPH, van der Schelling GP, van Zeeland M, de Graaf EJR, Groenendijk RPR, Karsten TM, Vermaas M, Schouten O, de Vries MR, Prins HA, Lips DJ, Bosker RJI, van der Hoeven JAB, Diks J, Plaisier PW, Kruyt PM, Sietses C, Stommel MWJ, Nienhuijs SW, de Hingh IHJT, Luyer MDP, van Montfort G, Ponten EH, Smulders JF, van Duyn EB, Klaase JM, Swank DJ, Ottow RT, Stockmann HBAC, Vermeulen J, Vuylsteke RJCLM, Belgers HJ, Fransen S, von Meijenfeldt EM, Sosef MN, van Geloven AAW, Hendriks ER, ter Horst B, Leeuwenburgh MMN, van Ruler O, Vogten JM, Vriens EJC, Westerterp M, Eijsbouts QAJ, Bentohami A, Bijlsma TS, de Korte N, Nio D, Govaert MJPM, Joosten JJA, Tollenaar RAEM, Stassen LPS, Wiezer MJ, Hazebroek EJ, Smits AB, van Westreenen HL, Lange JF, Brandt A, Nijboer WN, Mulder IM, Toorenvliet BR, Weidema WF, Coene PPLO, Mannaerts GHH, den Hartog D, de Vos RJ, Zengerink JF, Hoofwijk AGM, Hulsewé KWE, Melenhorst J, Stoot JHMB, Steup WH, Huijstee PJ, Merkus JWS, Wever JJ, Maring JK, Heisterkamp J, van Grevenstein WMU, Vriens MR, Besselink MGH, Borel Rinkes IHM, Witkamp AJ, Slooter GD, Konsten JLM, Engel AF, Pierik EGJM, Frakking TG, van Geldere D, Patijn GA, D’Hoore BAJL, de Buck AVO, Miserez M, Terrasson I, Wolthuis A, di Saverio S, de Blasiis MG. Laparoscopic peritoneal lavage versus sigmoidectomy for perforated diverticulitis with purulent peritonitis: three-year follow-up of the randomised LOLA trial. Surg Endosc 2022; 36:7764-7774. [PMID: 35606544 PMCID: PMC9485102 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-022-09326-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2021] [Accepted: 05/01/2022] [Indexed: 10/31/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background
This study aimed to compare laparoscopic lavage and sigmoidectomy as treatment for perforated diverticulitis with purulent peritonitis during a 36 month follow-up of the LOLA trial.
Methods
Within the LOLA arm of the international, multicentre LADIES trial, patients with perforated diverticulitis with purulent peritonitis were randomised between laparoscopic lavage and sigmoidectomy. Outcomes were collected up to 36 months. The primary outcome of the present study was cumulative morbidity and mortality. Secondary outcomes included reoperations (including stoma reversals), stoma rates, and sigmoidectomy rates in the lavage group.
Results
Long-term follow-up was recorded in 77 of the 88 originally included patients, 39 were randomised to sigmoidectomy (51%) and 38 to laparoscopic lavage (49%). After 36 months, overall cumulative morbidity (sigmoidectomy 28/39 (72%) versus lavage 32/38 (84%), p = 0·272) and mortality (sigmoidectomy 7/39 (18%) versus lavage 6/38 (16%), p = 1·000) did not differ. The number of patients who underwent a reoperation was significantly lower for lavage compared to sigmoidectomy (sigmoidectomy 27/39 (69%) versus lavage 17/38 (45%), p = 0·039). After 36 months, patients alive with stoma in situ was lower in the lavage group (proportion calculated from the Kaplan–Meier life table, sigmoidectomy 17% vs lavage 11%, log-rank p = 0·0268). Eventually, 17 of 38 (45%) patients allocated to lavage underwent sigmoidectomy.
Conclusion
Long-term outcomes showed that laparoscopic lavage was associated with less patients who underwent reoperations and lower stoma rates in patients alive after 36 months compared to sigmoidectomy. No differences were found in terms of cumulative morbidity or mortality. Patient selection should be improved to reduce risk for short-term complications after which lavage could still be a valuable treatment option.
Graphical abstract
Collapse
|
3
|
van Grevenstein WMU, van der Linde EM, Heetman JG, Lange JF, Ten Cate TJ, Wauben LSGL, Dekker-van Doorn CM. Crew Resource Management Training for Surgical Teams, A Fragmented Landscape. J Surg Educ 2021; 78:2102-2109. [PMID: 34134934 DOI: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2021.05.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2021] [Accepted: 05/20/2021] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Medical Crew Resource Management (CRM) training courses are designed to increase patient safety by reducing the effects of human errors. These training courses are most popular in surgery and a wide range of medical CRM training courses for surgical teams is now available. However, the effects of these CRM training courses on patient outcomes are inconclusive. Although surgical teams feel the need to be trained in team collaboration skills, they are often puzzled about what criteria to apply when choosing a medical CRM training course. This study aimed to compare CRM training courses on didactic components and simulation-exercises to explore if these courses are interchangeable. METHODS In this qualitative study, semi-structured interviews were conducted among 10 main CRM training providers of surgical teams in the Netherlands. RESULTS Although a large variety was found in the content of CRM training courses, the most substantial differences were found in the simulation-exercises. Nine out of 10 trainers stated that standard simulation-exercises would be a step forward to ensure quality in CRM trainings. According to the trainers, the implementation of medical CRM can reduce human errors and as a result, preventable patient complications. They suggested a quality standard for CRM trainers in the medical field to ensure the quality of medical team training as a way to reach this. CONCLUSIONS Medical CRM training courses are diverse and noninterchangeable. Trainers expect that if CRM becomes part of surgical training and is embedded in operating theatre culture, it could be of great value for patients and professionals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - E M van der Linde
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands; Research Centre Innovations in Care, Rotterdam University of Applied Sciences, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - J G Heetman
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - J F Lange
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Th J Ten Cate
- Centre for Research and Development of Education, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - L S G L Wauben
- Research Centre Innovations in Care, Rotterdam University of Applied Sciences, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Biomechanical Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands
| | - C M Dekker-van Doorn
- Research Centre Innovations in Care, Rotterdam University of Applied Sciences, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Verweij ME, Hoendervangers S, Couwenberg AM, Burbach JPM, Berbee M, Buijsen J, Roodhart J, Reerink O, Pronk A, Consten ECJ, Smits AB, Heikens JT, van Grevenstein WMU, Intven MPW, Verkooijen HM. Impact of dose-escalated chemoradiation on quality of life in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer: two year follow-up of the randomized RECTAL-BOOST trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2021; 112:694-703. [PMID: 34634436 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2021.09.052] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2021] [Revised: 09/28/2021] [Accepted: 09/30/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Dose-escalated chemoradiation (CRT) for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) did not result in higher complete response rates, but initiated more tumor regression in the randomized XXXXX trial (Clinicaltrials.gov XXXXX). This study compared patient reported outcomes (PROs) between patients who received dose-escalated CRT (5 × 3Gy boost + CRT) or standard CRT for two years following randomization. METHODS Patients with LARC, participating in the XXXXX trial, filled out EORTC QLQ-C30 and CR29 questionnaires on quality of life (QoL) and symptoms at baseline, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months following start of treatment. Between-group differences in functional QoL domains were estimated using a linear mixed-effects model and expressed as effect size (ES). Symptom scores were compared using Mann-Whitney U test. RESULTS Patients treated with dose-escalated CRT (boost group, n=51) experienced a significantly stronger decline in global health at 3 and 6 months (ES -0,4 and ES -0,4), physical functioning at 6 months (ES -1,1), role functioning at 3 and 6 months (ES -0,8 and ES -0,6) and social functioning at 6 months (ES -0,6) compared to patients treated with standard CRT (control group, n=64). The boost group reported significantly more fatigue at 3 and 6 months (83% vs. 66% resp. 89% vs. 76%), pain at 3 and 6 months (67% vs. 36% resp. 80% vs. 44%) and diarrhea at 3 months (45% vs. 29%) compared to the control group. From 12 months onwards, QoL and symptoms were similar between groups, apart from more blood/mucus in stool in the boost group. CONCLUSION In patients with LARC, dose-escalated CRT resulted in a transient deterioration in global health, physical, role, and social functioning and more pain, fatigue and diarrhea at 3 and 6 months following start of treatment compared to standard CRT. From 12 months onwards, the impact of dose-escalated CRT on QoL largely resolved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M E Verweij
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands; Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
| | - S Hoendervangers
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands; Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - A M Couwenberg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Ziekenhuis, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - J P M Burbach
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - M Berbee
- Department of Radiation Oncology (Maastro), GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - J Buijsen
- Department of Radiation Oncology (Maastro), GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - J Roodhart
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - O Reerink
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Isala Clinic, Zwolle, The Netherlands
| | - A Pronk
- Department of Surgery, Diakonessenhuis, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - E C J Consten
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands; Department of Surgery, Meander Medical Center, Amersfoort, The Netherlands
| | - A B Smits
- Department of Surgery, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| | - J T Heikens
- Department of Surgery, Hospital Rivierenland, Tiel, The Netherlands
| | | | - M P W Intven
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - H M Verkooijen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Schraa SJ, van Rooijen KL, van der Kruijssen DEW, Rubio Alarcón C, Phallen J, Sausen M, Simmons J, Coupé VMH, van Grevenstein WMU, Elias S, Verkooijen HM, Laclé MM, Bosch LJW, van den Broek D, Meijer GA, Velculescu VE, Fijneman RJA, Vink GR, Koopman M. Circulating tumor DNA guided adjuvant chemotherapy in stage II colon cancer (MEDOCC-CrEATE): study protocol for a trial within a cohort study. BMC Cancer 2020; 20:790. [PMID: 32819390 PMCID: PMC7441668 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-020-07252-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2020] [Accepted: 08/03/2020] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Accurate detection of patients with minimal residual disease (MRD) after surgery for stage II colon cancer (CC) remains an urgent unmet clinical need to improve selection of patients who might benefit form adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT). Presence of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is indicative for MRD and has high predictive value for recurrent disease. The MEDOCC-CrEATE trial investigates how many stage II CC patients with detectable ctDNA after surgery will accept ACT and whether ACT reduces the risk of recurrence in these patients. METHODS/DESIGN MEDOCC-CrEATE follows the 'trial within cohorts' (TwiCs) design. Patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) are included in the Prospective Dutch ColoRectal Cancer cohort (PLCRC) and give informed consent for collection of clinical data, tissue and blood samples, and consent for future randomization. MEDOCC-CrEATE is a subcohort within PLCRC consisting of 1320 stage II CC patients without indication for ACT according to current guidelines, who are randomized 1:1 into an experimental and a control arm. In the experimental arm, post-surgery blood samples and tissue are analyzed for tissue-informed detection of plasma ctDNA, using the PGDx elio™ platform. Patients with detectable ctDNA will be offered ACT consisting of 8 cycles of capecitabine plus oxaliplatin while patients without detectable ctDNA and patients in the control group will standard follow-up according to guideline. The primary endpoint is the proportion of patients receiving ACT when ctDNA is detectable after resection. The main secondary outcome is 2-year recurrence rate (RR), but also includes 5-year RR, disease free survival, overall survival, time to recurrence, quality of life and cost-effectiveness. Data will be analyzed by intention to treat. DISCUSSION The MEDOCC-CrEATE trial will provide insight into the willingness of stage II CC patients to be treated with ACT guided by ctDNA biomarker testing and whether ACT will prevent recurrences in a high-risk population. Use of the TwiCs design provides the opportunity to randomize patients before ctDNA measurement, avoiding ethical dilemmas of ctDNA status disclosure in the control group. TRIAL REGISTRATION Netherlands Trial Register: NL6281/NTR6455 . Registered 18 May 2017, https://www.trialregister.nl/trial/6281.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S J Schraa
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - K L van Rooijen
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - D E W van der Kruijssen
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - C Rubio Alarcón
- Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - J Phallen
- The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA
| | - M Sausen
- Personal Genome Diagnostics, Baltimore, MD, 21224, USA
| | - J Simmons
- Personal Genome Diagnostics, Baltimore, MD, 21224, USA
| | - V M H Coupé
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - W M U van Grevenstein
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - S Elias
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - H M Verkooijen
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - M M Laclé
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - L J W Bosch
- Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - D van den Broek
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - G A Meijer
- Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - V E Velculescu
- The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA
| | - R J A Fijneman
- Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - G R Vink
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - M Koopman
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
van den Berg I, van de Weerd S, Roodhart JML, Vink GR, van den Braak RRJC, Jimenez CR, Elias SG, van Vliet D, Koelink M, Hong E, van Grevenstein WMU, van Oijen MGH, Beets-Tan RGH, van Krieken JHJM, IJzermans JNM, Medema JP, Koopman M. Improving clinical management of colon cancer through CONNECTION, a nation-wide colon cancer registry and stratification effort (CONNECTION II trial): rationale and protocol of a single arm intervention study. BMC Cancer 2020; 20:776. [PMID: 32811457 PMCID: PMC7433093 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-020-07236-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2020] [Accepted: 07/29/2020] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND It is estimated that around 15-30% of patients with early stage colon cancer benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy. We are currently not capable of upfront selection of patients who benefit from chemotherapy, which indicates the need for additional predictive markers for response to chemotherapy. It has been shown that the consensus molecular subtypes (CMSs), defined by RNA-profiling, have prognostic and/or predictive value. Due to postoperative timing of chemotherapy in current guidelines, tumor response to chemotherapy per CMS is not known, which makes the differentiation between the prognostic and predictive value impossible. Therefore, we propose to assess the tumor response per CMS in the neoadjuvant chemotherapy setting. This will provide us with clear data on the predictive value for chemotherapy response of the CMSs. METHODS In this prospective, single arm, multicenter intervention study, 262 patients with resectable microsatellite stable cT3-4NxM0 colon cancer will be treated with two courses of neoadjuvant and two courses of adjuvant capecitabine and oxaliplatin. The primary endpoint is the pathological tumor response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy per CMS. Secondary endpoints are radiological tumor response, the prognostic value of these responses for recurrence free survival and overall survival and the differences in CMS classification of the same tumor before and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The study is scheduled to be performed in 8-10 Dutch hospitals. The first patient was included in February 2020. DISCUSSION Patient selection for adjuvant chemotherapy in early stage colon cancer is far from optimal. The CMS classification is a promising new biomarker, but a solid chemotherapy response assessment per subtype is lacking. In this study we will investigate whether CMS classification can be of added value in clinical decision making by analyzing the predictive value for chemotherapy response. This study can provide the results necessary to proceed to future studies in which (neo) adjuvant chemotherapy may be withhold in patients with a specific CMS subtype, who show no benefit from chemotherapy and for whom possible new treatments can be investigated. TRIAL REGISTRATION This study has been registered in the Netherlands Trial Register (NL8177) at 11-26-2019, https://www.trialregister.nl/trial/8177 . The study has been approved by the medical ethics committee Utrecht (MEC18/712).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- I van den Berg
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - S van de Weerd
- Laboratory for Experimental Oncology and Radiobiology, Center for Experimental and Molecular Medicine, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105, AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
- Oncode Institute, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - J M L Roodhart
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - G R Vink
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
- Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation, department of research, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | | | - C R Jimenez
- Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam UMC- location VUmc, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - S G Elias
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - D van Vliet
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - M Koelink
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - E Hong
- Department of radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - W M U van Grevenstein
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - M G H van Oijen
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - R G H Beets-Tan
- Department of radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - J H J M van Krieken
- Department of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - J N M IJzermans
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - J P Medema
- Laboratory for Experimental Oncology and Radiobiology, Center for Experimental and Molecular Medicine, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105, AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
- Oncode Institute, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - M Koopman
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Hoendervangers S, Burbach JPM, Lacle MM, Koopman M, van Grevenstein WMU, Intven MPW, Verkooijen HM. Pathological Complete Response Following Different Neoadjuvant Treatment Strategies for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol 2020; 27:4319-4336. [PMID: 32524461 PMCID: PMC7497700 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-020-08615-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2019] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
Background Pathological complete response (pCR) following neoadjuvant treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) is associated with better survival, less local recurrence, and less distant failure. Furthermore, pCR indicates that the rectum may have been preserved. This meta-analysis gives an overview of available neoadjuvant treatment strategies for LARC and analyzes how these perform in achieving pCR as compared with the standard of care. Methods Pubmed, Embase, and Cochrane Central bibliographic databases were searched. Randomized controlled trials in which patients received neoadjuvant treatment for MRI-staged nonmetastatic resectable LARC were included. The primary outcome was pCR, defined as ypT0N0. A meta-analysis of studies comparing an intervention with standard fluoropyrimidine-based chemoradiation (CRT) was performed. Results Of the 17 articles included in the systematic review, 11 were used for the meta-analysis. Addition of oxaliplatin to fluoropyrimidine-based CRT resulted in significantly more pCR compared with fluoropyrimidine-based CRT only (OR 1.46), but at the expense of more ≥ grade 3 toxicity. Other treatment strategies, including consolidation/induction chemotherapy and short-course radiotherapy (SCRT), did not improve pCR rates. None of the included trials reported a benefit in local control or OS. Five-year DFS was significantly worse after SCRT-delay compared with CRT (59% vs. 75.1%, HR 1.93). Conclusions All included trials fail to deliver high-level evidence to show an improvement in pCR compared with standard fluoropyrimidine-based CRT. The addition of oxaliplatin might result in more pCR but at the expense of more toxicity. Furthermore, this benefit does not translate into less local recurrence or improved survival. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1245/s10434-020-08615-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Hoendervangers
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands. .,Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| | - J P M Burbach
- Department of Surgery, MC Leeuwarden, Leeuwarden, The Netherlands
| | - M M Lacle
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - M Koopman
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | | - M P W Intven
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - H M Verkooijen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Hoendervangers S, Sparreboom CL, Intven MPW, Lange JF, Verkooijen HM, Doornebosch PG, van Grevenstein WMU. The effect of neoadjuvant short-course radiotherapy and delayed surgery versus chemoradiation on postoperative outcomes in locally advanced rectal cancer patients - A propensity score matched nationwide audit-based study. Eur J Surg Oncol 2020; 46:1605-1612. [PMID: 32192792 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2020.03.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2019] [Revised: 01/27/2020] [Accepted: 03/03/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate differences in postoperative outcomes between short-course radiotherapy and delayed surgery (SCRT-delay) and chemoradiation (CRT) in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). BACKGROUND Previous trials suggest that SCRT-delay could serve as an adequate neoadjuvant treatment for LARC. Therefore, in frail LARC patients SCRT-delay is recommended as an alternative to CRT. However, data on postoperative outcomes after SCRT-delay in comparison to CRT is scarce. METHODS This was an observational study with data from the Dutch ColoRectal Audit (DCRA). LARC patients who underwent surgery (2014-2017) after an interval of ≥6 weeks were included. Missing values were replaced by multiple imputation. Propensity score matching (PSM), using age, Charlson Comorbidity Index, cT-stage and surgical procedure, was applied to create comparable groups. Differences in postoperative outcomes were analyzed using Chi-square test for categorical variables, independent sample t-test for continuous variables and Mann-Whitney U test for non-parametric data. RESULTS 2926 patients were included. In total, 288 patients received SCRT-delay and 2638 patients underwent CRT. Patients in the SCRT-delay group were older and had more comorbidities. Also, ICU-admissions and permanent colostomies were more common, as well as pulmonic, cardiologic, infectious and neurologic complications. After PSM, both groups comprised 246 patients with equivalent age, comorbidities and tumor stage. There were no differences in postoperative complications. CONCLUSION Postoperative complications were not increased in LARC patients undergoing SCRT-delay as neoadjuvant treatment. Regarding treatment-related complications, SCRT-delay is a safe alternative neoadjuvant treatment option for frail LARC patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Hoendervangers
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands; Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
| | - C L Sparreboom
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - M P W Intven
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - J F Lange
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Surgery, IJsselland Ziekenhuis, Capelle a/d Ijssel, the Netherlands
| | - H M Verkooijen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - P G Doornebosch
- Department of Surgery, IJsselland Ziekenhuis, Capelle a/d Ijssel, the Netherlands
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Sparreboom CL, Komen N, Rizopoulos D, Verhaar AP, Dik WA, Wu Z, van Westreenen HL, Doornebosch PG, Dekker JWT, Menon AG, Daams F, Lips D, van Grevenstein WMU, Karsten TM, Bayon Y, Peppelenbosch MP, Wolthuis AM, D'Hoore A, Lange JF. A multicentre cohort study of serum and peritoneal biomarkers to predict anastomotic leakage after rectal cancer resection. Colorectal Dis 2020; 22:36-45. [PMID: 31344302 PMCID: PMC6973162 DOI: 10.1111/codi.14789] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2019] [Accepted: 07/19/2019] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
AIM Anastomotic leakage (AL) is one of the most feared complications after rectal resection. This study aimed to assess a combination of biomarkers for early detection of AL after rectal cancer resection. METHOD This study was an international multicentre prospective cohort study. All patients received a pelvic drain after rectal cancer resection. On the first three postoperative days drain fluid was collected daily and C-reactive protein (CRP) was measured. Matrix metalloproteinase-2 (MMP2), MMP9, glucose, lactate, interleukin 1-beta (IL1β), IL6, IL10, tumour necrosis factor alpha (TNFα), Escherichia coli, Enterococcus faecalis, lipopolysaccharide-binding protein and amylase were measured in the drain fluid. Prediction models for AL were built for each postoperative day using multivariate penalized logistic regression. Model performance was estimated by the c-index for discrimination. The model with the best performance was visualized with a nomogram and calibration was plotted. RESULTS A total of 292 patients were analysed; 38 (13.0%) patients suffered from AL, with a median interval to diagnosis of 6.0 (interquartile ratio 4.0-14.8) days. AL occurred less often after partial than after total mesorectal excision (4.9% vs 15.2%, P = 0.035). Of all patients with AL, 26 (68.4%) required reoperation. AL was more often treated by reoperation in patients without a diverting ileostomy (18/20 vs 8/18, P = 0.03). The prediction model for postoperative day 1 included MMP9, TNFα, diverting ileostomy and surgical technique (c-index = 0.71). The prediction model for postoperative day 2 only included CRP (c-index = 0.69). The prediction model for postoperative day 3 included CRP and MMP9 and obtained the best model performance (c-index = 0.78). CONCLUSION The combination of serum CRP and peritoneal MMP9 may be useful for earlier prediction of AL after rectal cancer resection. In clinical practice, this combination of biomarkers should be interpreted in the clinical context as with any other diagnostic tool.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C. L. Sparreboom
- Department of SurgeryErasmus MC – University Medical CentreRotterdamThe Netherlands
| | - N. Komen
- Department of Abdominal SurgeryUniversity Hospital AntwerpUniversity of AntwerpEdegemBelgium
| | - D. Rizopoulos
- Department of BiostatisticsErasmus MC – University Medical CenterRotterdamThe Netherlands
| | - A. P. Verhaar
- Department of Gastroenterology and HepatologyErasmus MC – University Medical CenterRotterdamThe Netherlands
| | - W. A. Dik
- Department of ImmunologyLaboratory Medical ImmunologyErasmus MC – University Medical CenterRotterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Z. Wu
- Department of SurgeryErasmus MC – University Medical CentreRotterdamThe Netherlands
| | | | - P. G. Doornebosch
- Department of SurgeryIJsselland ZiekenhuisCapelle aan den IjsselThe Netherlands
| | - J. W. T. Dekker
- Department of SurgeryReinier de Graaf GasthuisDelftThe Netherlands
| | - A. G. Menon
- Department of SurgeryIJsselland ZiekenhuisCapelle aan den IjsselThe Netherlands,Department of SurgeryHavenziekenhuisRotterdamThe Netherlands
| | - F. Daams
- Department of SurgeryVU University Medical CenterAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| | - D. Lips
- Department of SurgeryJeroen Bosch ZiekenhuisHertogenboschThe Netherlands
| | | | - T. M. Karsten
- Department of SurgeryOnze Lieve Vrouwe GasthuisAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Y. Bayon
- Sofradim Production, A Medtronic CompanyTrévouxFrance
| | - M. P. Peppelenbosch
- Department of Gastroenterology and HepatologyErasmus MC – University Medical CenterRotterdamThe Netherlands
| | - A. M. Wolthuis
- Department of Abdominal SurgeryUniversity Hospital LeuvenLeuvenBelgium
| | - A. D'Hoore
- Department of Abdominal SurgeryUniversity Hospital LeuvenLeuvenBelgium
| | - J. F. Lange
- Department of SurgeryErasmus MC – University Medical CentreRotterdamThe Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Sparreboom CL, Komen N, Rizopoulos D, van Westreenen HL, Doornebosch PG, Dekker JWT, Menon AG, Tuynman JB, Daams F, Lips D, van Grevenstein WMU, Karsten TM, Lange JF, D'Hoore A, Wolthuis AM. Transanal total mesorectal excision: how are we doing so far? Colorectal Dis 2019; 21:767-774. [PMID: 30844130 PMCID: PMC6850385 DOI: 10.1111/codi.14601] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2018] [Accepted: 02/25/2019] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
AIM This subgroup analysis of a prospective multicentre cohort study aims to compare postoperative morbidity between transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) and laparoscopic total mesorectal excision (LaTME). METHOD The study was designed as a subgroup analysis of a prospective multicentre cohort study. Patients undergoing TaTME or LaTME for rectal cancer were selected. All patients were followed up until the first visit to the outpatient clinic after hospital discharge. Postoperative complications were classified according to the Clavien-Dindo classification and the comprehensive complication index (CCI). Propensity score matching was performed. RESULTS In total, 220 patients were selected from the overall prospective multicentre cohort study. After propensity score matching, 48 patients from each group were compared. The median tumour height for TaTME was 10.0 cm (6.0-10.8) and for LaTME was 9.5 cm (7.0-12.0) (P = 0.459). The duration of surgery and anaesthesia were both significantly longer for TaTME (221 vs 180 min, P < 0.001, and 264 vs 217 min, P < 0.001). TaTME was not converted to laparotomy whilst surgery in five patients undergoing LaTME was converted to laparotomy (0.0% vs 10.4%, P = 0.056). No statistically significant differences were observed for Clavien-Dindo classification, CCI, readmissions, reoperations and mortality. CONCLUSION The study showed that TaTME is a safe and feasible approach for rectal cancer resection. This new technique obtained similar postoperative morbidity to LaTME.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C. L. Sparreboom
- Department of SurgeryErasmus University Medical CenterRotterdamThe Netherlands
| | - N. Komen
- Department of SurgeryUniversity Hospital AntwerpEdegemBelgium
| | - D. Rizopoulos
- Department of BiostatisticsErasmus University Medical CenterRotterdamThe Netherlands
| | | | - P. G. Doornebosch
- Department of SurgeryIJsselland ZiekenhuisCapelle aan den IJsselThe Netherlands
| | - J. W. T. Dekker
- Department of SurgeryReinier de Graaf GasthuisDelftThe Netherlands
| | - A. G. Menon
- Department of SurgeryIJsselland ZiekenhuisCapelle aan den IJsselThe Netherlands
| | - J. B. Tuynman
- Department of SurgeryVU University Medical CenterAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| | - F. Daams
- Department of SurgeryVU University Medical CenterAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| | - D. Lips
- Department of SurgeryJeroen Bosch ZiekenhuisHertogenboschThe Netherlands
| | | | - T. M. Karsten
- Department of SurgeryOnze Lieve Vrouwe GasthuisAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| | - J. F. Lange
- Department of SurgeryErasmus University Medical CenterRotterdamThe Netherlands
| | - A. D'Hoore
- Departmenf of Abdominal SurgeryUniversity Hospital LeuvenLeuvenBelgium
| | - A. M. Wolthuis
- Departmenf of Abdominal SurgeryUniversity Hospital LeuvenLeuvenBelgium
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Ubink I, Bolhaqueiro ACF, Elias SG, Raats DAE, Constantinides A, Peters NA, Wassenaar ECE, de Hingh IHJT, Rovers KP, van Grevenstein WMU, Laclé MM, Kops GJPL, Borel Rinkes IHM, Kranenburg O. Organoids from colorectal peritoneal metastases as a platform for improving hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy. Br J Surg 2019; 106:1404-1414. [PMID: 31197820 PMCID: PMC6771632 DOI: 10.1002/bjs.11206] [Citation(s) in RCA: 53] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2019] [Revised: 03/11/2019] [Accepted: 03/15/2019] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Background Patients with peritoneal metastases from colorectal cancer have a poor prognosis. If the intraperitoneal tumour load is limited, patients may be eligible for cytoreductive surgery followed by hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). This treatment has improved overall survival, but recurrence rates are high. The aim of this study was to create a preclinical platform for the development of more effective intraperitoneal chemotherapy strategies. Methods Using organoid technology, five tumour cultures were generated from malignant ascites and resected peritoneal metastases. These were used in an in vitro HIPEC model to assess sensitivity to mitomycin C (MMC) and oxaliplatin, the drugs used most commonly in HIPEC. The model was also used to test a rational combination treatment involving MMC and inhibitors of the checkpoint kinase ATR. Results MMC was more effective in eliminating peritoneal metastasis‐derived organoids than oxaliplatin at clinically relevant concentrations. However, the drug concentrations required to eliminate 50 per cent of the tumour cells (IC50) were higher than the median clinical dose in two of five organoid lines for MMC, and all five lines for oxaliplatin, indicating a general resistance to monotherapy. ATR inhibition increased the sensitivity of all peritoneal metastasis‐derived organoids to MMC, as the IC50 decreased 2·6–12·4‐fold to well below concentrations commonly attained in clinical practice. Live‐cell imaging and flow cytometric analysis showed that ATR inhibition did not release cells from MMC‐induced cell cycle arrest, but caused increased replication stress and accelerated cell death. Conclusion Peritoneal metastasis‐derived organoids can be used to evaluate existing HIPEC regimens on an individual‐patient level and for development of more effective treatment strategies.
Surgical relevance Cytoreductive surgery followed by hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) has improved prognosis of patients with peritoneal metastases from colorectal cancer, but disease recurrence is common. More effective and personalized HIPEC is urgently needed. Organoid technology is frequently used for drug screens, as patient‐derived organoids can accurately predict clinical therapeutic response in vitro. A panel of organoids was established from peritoneal metastases from colorectal cancer and used to develop a model for testing HIPEC regimens in vitro. Patient‐derived organoids differed in sensitivity to commonly used chemotherapeutics, in line with variable clinical outcomes following cytoreductive surgery–HIPEC. Combining MMC with an ATR inhibitor improved the efficacy of MMC. Peritoneal metastasis‐derived organoids can be used as a platform to test novel (combination) strategies that increase HIPEC efficacy. In the future, organoids could be used to select patent‐tailored HIPEC regimens.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- I Ubink
- Department of Surgical Oncology, UMC Utrecht Cancer Centre, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - A C F Bolhaqueiro
- Oncode Institute, Hubrecht Institute - Royal Academy of Arts and Sciences and University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - S G Elias
- Julius Centre for Health Sciences and Primary Care, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - D A E Raats
- Department of Surgical Oncology, UMC Utrecht Cancer Centre, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - A Constantinides
- Department of Surgical Oncology, UMC Utrecht Cancer Centre, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - N A Peters
- Department of Surgical Oncology, UMC Utrecht Cancer Centre, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - E C E Wassenaar
- Department of Surgical Oncology, UMC Utrecht Cancer Centre, Utrecht, the Netherlands.,Department of Surgery, St Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, the Netherlands
| | - I H J T de Hingh
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Netherlands.,GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - K P Rovers
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | - W M U van Grevenstein
- Department of Surgical Oncology, UMC Utrecht Cancer Centre, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - M M Laclé
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - G J P L Kops
- Oncode Institute, Hubrecht Institute - Royal Academy of Arts and Sciences and University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - I H M Borel Rinkes
- Department of Surgical Oncology, UMC Utrecht Cancer Centre, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - O Kranenburg
- Department of Surgical Oncology, UMC Utrecht Cancer Centre, Utrecht, the Netherlands.,Utrecht Platform for Organoid Technology, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Ubink I, van Eden WJ, Snaebjornsson P, Kok NFM, van Kuik J, van Grevenstein WMU, Laclé MM, Sanders J, Fijneman RJA, Elias SG, Borel Rinkes IHM, Aalbers AGJ, Kranenburg O. Histopathological and molecular classification of colorectal cancer and corresponding peritoneal metastases. Br J Surg 2018; 105:e204-e211. [PMID: 29341165 DOI: 10.1002/bjs.10788] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2017] [Revised: 09/19/2017] [Accepted: 11/16/2017] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with colorectal peritoneal carcinomatosis have a very poor prognosis. The recently developed consensus molecular subtype (CMS) classification of primary colorectal cancer categorizes tumours into four robust subtypes, which could guide subtype-targeted therapy. CMS4, also known as the mesenchymal subtype, has the greatest propensity to form distant metastases. CMS4 status and histopathological features of colorectal peritoneal carcinomatosis were investigated in this study. METHODS Fresh-frozen tissue samples from primary colorectal cancer and paired peritoneal metastases from patients who underwent cytoreductive surgery combined with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy were collected. Histopathological features were analysed, and a reverse transcriptase-quantitative PCR test was used to assess CMS4 status of all collected lesions. RESULTS Colorectal peritoneal carcinomatosis was associated with adverse histopathological characteristics, including a high percentage of stroma in both primary tumours and metastases, and poor differentiation grade and high-grade tumour budding in primary tumours. Furthermore, CMS4 was significantly enriched in primary tumours with peritoneal metastases, compared with unselected stage I-IV tumours (60 per cent (12 of 20) versus 23 per cent; P = 0.002). The majority of peritoneal metastases (75 per cent, 21 of 28) were also classified as CMS4. Considerable intrapatient subtype heterogeneity was observed. Notably, 15 of 16 patients with paired tumours had at least one CMS4-positive tumour location. CONCLUSION Significant enrichment for CMS4 was observed in colorectal peritoneal carcinomatosis. Surgical relevance Cytoreductive surgery combined with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS-HIPEC) improves survival of selected patients with colorectal peritoneal carcinomatosis, but recurrence is common. Histopathological and molecular analysis of colorectal peritoneal carcinomatosis could provide clues for development of novel therapies. In this study, colorectal peritoneal carcinomatosis was found to be enriched for tumours with high stromal content and CMS4-positive status. To further improve prognosis for patients with colorectal peritoneal carcinomatosis, therapies that target tumour-stroma interaction could be added to CRS-HIPEC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- I Ubink
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Cancer Centre, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - W J van Eden
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - P Snaebjornsson
- Department of Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - N F M Kok
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - J van Kuik
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - W M U van Grevenstein
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Cancer Centre, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - M M Laclé
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - J Sanders
- Department of Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - R J A Fijneman
- Department of Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - S G Elias
- Julius Centre for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - I H M Borel Rinkes
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Cancer Centre, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - A G J Aalbers
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - O Kranenburg
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Cancer Centre, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.,Division of Biomedical Genetics, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Coebergh van den Braak RRJ, van Rijssen LB, van Kleef JJ, Vink GR, Berbee M, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Bloemendal HJ, Bruno MJ, Burgmans MC, Busch ORC, Coene PPLO, Coupé VMH, Dekker JWT, van Eijck CHJ, Elferink MAG, Erdkamp FLG, van Grevenstein WMU, de Groot JWB, van Grieken NCT, de Hingh IHJT, Hulshof MCCM, Ijzermans JNM, Kwakkenbos L, Lemmens VEPP, Los M, Meijer GA, Molenaar IQ, Nieuwenhuijzen GAP, de Noo ME, van de Poll-Franse LV, Punt CJA, Rietbroek RC, Roeloffzen WWH, Rozema T, Ruurda JP, van Sandick JW, Schiphorst AHW, Schipper H, Siersema PD, Slingerland M, Sommeijer DW, Spaander MCW, Sprangers MAG, Stockmann HBAC, Strijker M, van Tienhoven G, Timmermans LM, Tjin-a-Ton MLR, van der Velden AMT, Verhaar MJ, Verkooijen HM, Vles WJ, de Vos-Geelen JMPGM, Wilmink JW, Zimmerman DDE, van Oijen MGH, Koopman M, Besselink MGH, van Laarhoven HWM. Nationwide comprehensive gastro-intestinal cancer cohorts: the 3P initiative. Acta Oncol 2018; 57:195-202. [PMID: 28723307 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2017.1346381] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The increasing sub-classification of cancer patients due to more detailed molecular classification of tumors, and limitations of current trial designs, require innovative research designs. We present the design, governance and current standing of three comprehensive nationwide cohorts including pancreatic, esophageal/gastric, and colorectal cancer patients (NCT02070146). Multidisciplinary collection of clinical data, tumor tissue, blood samples, and patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures with a nationwide coverage, provides the infrastructure for future and novel trial designs and facilitates research to improve outcomes of gastrointestinal cancer patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS All patients aged ≥18 years with pancreatic, esophageal/gastric or colorectal cancer are eligible. Patients provide informed consent for: (1) reuse of clinical data; (2) biobanking of primary tumor tissue; (3) collection of blood samples; (4) to be informed about relevant newly identified genomic aberrations; (5) collection of longitudinal PROs; and (6) to receive information on new interventional studies and possible participation in cohort multiple randomized controlled trials (cmRCT) in the future. RESULTS In 2015, clinical data of 21,758 newly diagnosed patients were collected in the Netherlands Cancer Registry. Additional clinical data on the surgical procedures were registered in surgical audits for 13,845 patients. Within the first two years, tumor tissue and blood samples were obtained from 1507 patients; during this period, 1180 patients were included in the PRO registry. Response rate for PROs was 90%. The consent rate to receive information on new interventional studies and possible participation in cmRCTs in the future was >85%. The number of hospitals participating in the cohorts is steadily increasing. CONCLUSION A comprehensive nationwide multidisciplinary gastrointestinal cancer cohort is feasible and surpasses the limitations of classical study designs. With this initiative, novel and innovative studies can be performed in an efficient, safe, and comprehensive setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - L. B. van Rijssen
- Department of Surgery, Academic Medical Center, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - J. J. van Kleef
- Department of Medical Oncology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - G. R. Vink
- Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - M. Berbee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Maastro Clinic, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | | | - H. J. Bloemendal
- Department of Medical Oncology, Meander Medisch Centrum, Amersfoort, The Netherlands
| | - M. J. Bruno
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - M. C. Burgmans
- Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - O. R. C. Busch
- Department of Surgery, Academic Medical Center, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - P. P. L. O. Coene
- Department of Surgery, Maasstad Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - V. M. H. Coupé
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - J. W. T. Dekker
- Department of Surgery, Reinier de Graaf Hospital, Delft, The Netherlands
| | - C. H. J. van Eijck
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - M. A. G. Elferink
- Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - F. L. G. Erdkamp
- Department of Medical Oncology, Zuyderland Medisch Centrum, Heerlen, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - N. C. T. van Grieken
- Department of Pathology, VU University Medical Center, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - M. C. C. M. Hulshof
- Department of Radiotherapy, Academic Medical Center, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - J. N. M. Ijzermans
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - M. Los
- Department of Medical Oncology, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| | - G. A. Meijer
- Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - I. Q. Molenaar
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | | - M. E. de Noo
- Department of Surgery, Deventer Hospital, Deventer, The Netherlands
| | | | - C. J. A. Punt
- Department of Medical Oncology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - R. C. Rietbroek
- Department of Medical Oncology, Rode Kruis Hospital, Beverwijk, The Netherlands
| | - W. W. H. Roeloffzen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Treant Zorggroep, Hoogeveen, The Netherlands
| | - T. Rozema
- Department of Radiotherapy, Instituut Verbeeten, Tilburg, The Netherlands
| | - J. P. Ruurda
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - J. W. van Sandick
- Department of Surgery, Netherlands Cancer Institute – Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - H. Schipper
- Stichting voor Patiënten met Kanker aan het Spijsverteringskanaal (SPKS), Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - P. D. Siersema
- Department of Gastroenterology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - M. Slingerland
- Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - D. W. Sommeijer
- Department of Medical Oncology, Flevoziekenhuis, Almere, The Netherlands
| | - M. C. W. Spaander
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - M. A. G. Sprangers
- Department of Medical Psychology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - M. Strijker
- Department of Surgery, Academic Medical Center, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - G. van Tienhoven
- Department of Radiotherapy, Academic Medical Center, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - L. M. Timmermans
- Stichting voor Patiënten met Kanker aan het Spijsverteringskanaal (SPKS), Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - M. L. R. Tjin-a-Ton
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Rivierenland, Tiel, The Netherlands
| | | | - M. J. Verhaar
- Department of Medical Oncology, Zuwe Hofpoort Hospital, Woerden, The Netherlands
| | - H. M. Verkooijen
- Department of Epidemiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - W. J. Vles
- Department of Surgery, Ikazia Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - J. W. Wilmink
- Department of Medical Oncology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - D. D. E. Zimmerman
- Department of Surgery, Elisabeth-Tweesteden Hospital, Tilburg, The Netherlands
| | - M. G. H. van Oijen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - M. Koopman
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - M. G. H. Besselink
- Department of Surgery, Academic Medical Center, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Borstlap WAA, Tanis PJ, Koedam TWA, Marijnen CAM, Cunningham C, Dekker E, van Leerdam ME, Meijer G, van Grieken N, Nagtegaal ID, Punt CJA, Dijkgraaf MGW, De Wilt JH, Beets G, de Graaf EJ, van Geloven AAW, Gerhards MF, van Westreenen HL, van de Ven AWH, van Duijvendijk P, de Hingh IHJT, Leijtens JWA, Sietses C, Spillenaar-Bilgen EJ, Vuylsteke RJCLM, Hoff C, Burger JWA, van Grevenstein WMU, Pronk A, Bosker RJI, Prins H, Smits AB, Bruin S, Zimmerman DD, Stassen LPS, Dunker MS, Westerterp M, Coene PP, Stoot J, Bemelman WA, Tuynman JB. A multi-centred randomised trial of radical surgery versus adjuvant chemoradiotherapy after local excision for early rectal cancer. BMC Cancer 2016; 16:513. [PMID: 27439975 PMCID: PMC4955121 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-016-2557-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 62] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2016] [Accepted: 07/13/2016] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Rectal cancer surgery is accompanied with high morbidity and poor long term functional outcome. Screening programs have shown a shift towards more early staged cancers. Patients with early rectal cancer can potentially benefit significantly from rectal preserving therapy. For the earliest stage cancers, local excision is sufficient when the risk of lymph node disease and subsequent recurrence is below 5 %. However, the majority of early cancers are associated with an intermediate risk of lymph node involvement (5–20 %) suggesting that local excision alone is not sufficient, while completion radical surgery, which is currently standard of care, could be a substantial overtreatment for this group of patients. Methods/Study design In this multicentre randomised trial, patients with an intermediate risk T1-2 rectal cancer, that has been locally excised using an endoluminal technique, will be randomized between adjuvant chemo-radiotherapylimited to the mesorectum and standard completion total mesorectal excision (TME). To strictly monitor the risk of locoregional recurrence in the experimental arm and enable early salvage surgery, there will be additional follow up with frequent MRI and endoscopy. The primary outcome of the study is three-year local recurrence rate. Secondary outcomes are morbidity, disease free and overall survival, stoma rate, functional outcomes, health related quality of life and costs. The design is a non inferiority study with a total sample size of 302 patients. Discussion The results of the TESAR trial will potentially demonstrate that adjuvant chemoradiotherapy is an oncological safe treatment option in patients who are confronted with the difficult clinical dilemma of a radically removed intermediate risk early rectal cancer by polypectomy or transanal surgery that is conventionally treated with subsequent radical surgery. Preserving the rectum using adjuvant radiotherapy is expected to significantly improve morbidity, function and quality of life if compared to completion TME surgery. Trial registration NCT02371304, registration date: February 2015
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- W A A Borstlap
- Department of Surgery, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - P J Tanis
- Department of Surgery, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - T W A Koedam
- Department of Surgery, VU University Medical Center, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - C A M Marijnen
- Department of Radiotherapy, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - C Cunningham
- Department of Surgery, Oxford University Hospital, Oxford, UK
| | - E Dekker
- Department of Gastroenterology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - M E van Leerdam
- Department of Gastroenterology, Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - G Meijer
- Department of Pathology, Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - N van Grieken
- Department of Pathology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - I D Nagtegaal
- Department of Pathology, RadboudUMC, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - C J A Punt
- Department of Medical Oncology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - M G W Dijkgraaf
- Clinical Research Unit, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - J H De Wilt
- Department of Surgery, RadboudUMC, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - G Beets
- Department of Surgery, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - E J de Graaf
- Department of Surgery, IJselland Hospital, Capelle aan de Ijssel, The Netherlands
| | | | - M F Gerhards
- Department of surgery, Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | | - I H J T de Hingh
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - J W A Leijtens
- Department of Surgery, Laurentius Hospital, Roermond, The Netherlands
| | - C Sietses
- Department of Surgery, Gelderse Vallei Hospital, Ede, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - C Hoff
- Department of Surgery, Medisch Centrum Leewarden, Leeuwarden, The Netherlands
| | - J W A Burger
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - A Pronk
- Department of Surgery, Diaconessenziekehuis, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - R J I Bosker
- Department of Surgery, Deventer Hospital, Deventer, The Netherlands
| | - H Prins
- Department of Surgery, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, Den Bosch, The Netherlands
| | - A B Smits
- Department of Surgery, Sint. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| | - S Bruin
- Department of Surgery, Slotervaart Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - D D Zimmerman
- Department of Surgery, Elisabeth-TweeSteden Hospital, Tilburg, The Netherlands
| | - L P S Stassen
- Department of Surgery, MUMC, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - M S Dunker
- Department of Surgery, Noordwest Ziekenhuisgroep, Alkmaar, The Netherlands
| | - M Westerterp
- Department of Surgery, Medical Center Haaglanden, The Hague, The Netherlands
| | - P P Coene
- Department of Surgery, Maasstad Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - J Stoot
- Department of Surgery, Zuyderland Hospital, Sittard, The Netherlands
| | - W A Bemelman
- Department of Surgery, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - J B Tuynman
- Department of Surgery, VU University Medical Center, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Walma MS, Burbach JPM, Verheijen PM, Pronk A, van Grevenstein WMU. Vacuum-assisted closure therapy for infected perineal wounds after abdominoperineal resection. A retrospective cohort study. Int J Surg 2015; 26:18-24. [PMID: 26718610 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2015.12.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/04/2015] [Revised: 11/18/2015] [Accepted: 12/01/2015] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Perineal wound complications are a main problem after abdominoperineal resection (APR). There is little evidence concerning perineal wound management. This study describes and evaluates the role of vacuum-assisted closure (VAC) therapy in wound management strategies of perineal wound infections after APR. METHODS Patients undergoing APR for malignant disease between January 2007 and January 2013 were identified retrospectively. Data regarding occurrence and management of perineal wound complications were collected. Perineal wound infections were classified into minor or major complications and time to wound healing was measured. Time to wound healing was compared between patients receiving routine care or with additional VAC therapy. RESULTS Of 171 included patients, 76 (44.4%) had minor and 36 (21.1%) major perineal wound infections. Management of major infected perineal wounds consisted of drainage (n = 16), debridement (n = 4), drainage combined with debridement (n = 4), VAC therapy alone (n = 5), or VAC therapy combined with other treatments (n = 7). Median duration of perineal wound healing in major infected wounds was 141 days (range 17-739). Median time to wound healing was not different in patients treated with (172 days, range 23-368) or without VAC therapy (131 days, range 17-739). DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION In this study, VAC therapy did not shorten time to wound healing. However, prospective studies are required to investigate the role of VAC therapy in management of infected perineal wounds after APR. Up to then, wound management will remain to be based on clinical perception and 'gut-feeling'.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M S Walma
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Centre, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| | - J P M Burbach
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Centre, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - P M Verheijen
- Department of Surgery, Meander Medical Centre, Maatweg 3, 3813 TZ, Amersfoort, The Netherlands
| | - A Pronk
- Department of Surgery, Diakonessenhuis, Bosboomstraat 1, 3582 KE, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - W M U van Grevenstein
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Centre, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Wauben LSGL, van Grevenstein WMU, Goossens RHM, van der Meulen FH, Lange JF. Operative notes do not reflect reality in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 2011; 98:1431-6. [DOI: 10.1002/bjs.7576] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/30/2011] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Operative notes represent an essential element in safe patient care and should therefore be clear and accurate. This comparative study examined whether operative notes accurately represented the laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) as performed.
Methods
Nine Dutch teaching and non-teaching hospitals were invited to record 20 successive LCs each and to collect the corresponding operative notes. The main outcome measures were overall differences and correspondence between video recordings and notes based on the Dutch guideline for LC and the occurrence of iatrogenic gallbladder perforation. A comparison was made of the cumulative results of recordings and operative notes, and individual recordings were compared with the corresponding notes.
Results
Seven hospitals participated in the study; 125 video recordings and operative notes were fully analysed. Recordings showed more steps of the procedure than did notes. Individual comparisons showed significant differences (P≤0·001) between the recording and the corresponding note for the steps ‘Introducing trocars under vision’, ‘Condition of the gallbladder’, ‘Critical view of safety’ and ‘Removing first and second trocar under vision’. Iatrogenic gallbladder perforation with spilled bile occurred in 31 patients (24·8 per cent), and was both recorded and reported in 29 patients. Iatrogenic gallbladder perforation with spilled bile and spilled stones occurred in 15 patients (12·0 per cent), and was recorded and reported in 11 patients.
Conclusion
Operative notes do not adequately represent the actual LCs performed as they describe fewer important procedural steps. It is suggested that operative notes should include video recordings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L S G L Wauben
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Applied Ergonomics and Design, Faculty of Industrial Design Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands
| | - W M U van Grevenstein
- Department of Oncological and Gastrointestinal Surgery, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - R H M Goossens
- Department of Neuroscience, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Applied Ergonomics and Design, Faculty of Industrial Design Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands
| | - F H van der Meulen
- Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands
| | - J F Lange
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Aalbers AGJ, ten Kate M, van Grevenstein WMU, Hofland LJ, Wiemer EAC, Jeekel J, van Eijck CHJ. A small mammal model of tumour implantation, dissemination and growth factor expression after partial hepatectomy. European Journal of Surgical Oncology (EJSO) 2008; 34:469-75. [PMID: 17442529 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2007.02.035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2006] [Accepted: 02/28/2007] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Surgical resection remains the most effective therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer confined to the liver, although the extrahepatic recurrence rate is high. AIM OF THE STUDY To develop a mammal model in order to investigate by which mechanisms liver surgery affects distant tumour recurrence. METHODS In this animal study the effect of partial hepatectomy (phX) on the development of tumour noduli in the lungs was evaluated. CC531 rat colon carcinoma cells were inoculated i.v. 24h before, during or 24h after surgery. Rat serum was obtained at different time-points after phX and added to in vitro CC531 cell cultures. Finally, phX was compared with an ileum resection (ilX). RESULTS phX leads to increased tumour noduli in the lungs, compared to Sham operation (p=0.002), but only when performed directly before the injection of tumour cells and not when performed 24h before or after the inoculation. Comparable results were obtained for ilX. No growth stimulation of tumour cells after incubation with rat serum, obtained at different time-points after phX, could be detected in vitro. CONCLUSION Not only phX, but also surgery, in general promotes distant tumour recurrence exerting the effect during the early phase of tumour cell adhesion and not during tumour outgrowth.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A G J Aalbers
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus Medical Centre, University Hospital Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
van Grevenstein WMU, Hofland LJ, van Rossen MEE, van Koetsveld PM, Jeekel J, van Eijck CHJ. Inflammatory cytokines stimulate the adhesion of colon carcinoma cells to mesothelial monolayers. Dig Dis Sci 2007; 52:2775-83. [PMID: 17394066 DOI: 10.1007/s10620-007-9778-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2006] [Accepted: 01/18/2007] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
Surgical handling of the peritoneum causes an inflammatory reaction, during which a potentially lethal cocktail of active mediators is produced, including cytokines and growth factors. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of inflammatory cytokines on the interaction between tumor and mesothelial cells. Tumor cell adhesion to a mesothelial monolayer was assessed after preincubation of the mesothelium with interleukin (IL)-1beta, IL-6, and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha. Preincubation of the mesothelial monolayer with IL-1beta or TNF-alpha resulted in enhanced tumor cell adhesion of Caco2 and HT29 colon carcinoma cells. The amount of stimulation for the Caco2 cells was between 20% and 40% and for HT29 cells between 30% and 70%. Blocking experiments with anti-IL-1beta and anti-TNF-alpha resulted in significant inhibition of the cytokine-stimulated tumor cell adhesion. The presented results prove that IL-1beta and TNF-alpha are significant stimulating factors in tumor cell adhesion in vitro and may therefore account for tumor recurrence to the peritoneum in vivo.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- W M U van Grevenstein
- Laboratories for Experimental Surgery and Oncology, Erasmus MC Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
van den Tol MP, ten Raa S, van Grevenstein WMU, van Rossen MEE, Jeekel J, van Eijck CHJ. The post-surgical inflammatory response provokes enhanced tumour recurrence: a crucial role for neutrophils. Dig Surg 2007; 24:388-94. [PMID: 17785985 DOI: 10.1159/000107781] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2006] [Accepted: 11/29/2006] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIMS Peritoneal trauma activates a cascade of peritoneal defence mechanisms responsible for postoperative intra-abdominal tumour recurrence. After peritoneal trauma, inflammatory cells and soluble factors are present in the abdominal cavity and can be captured in lavage fluids. The present study evaluated which component enhances intra-abdominal tumour recurrence. Furthermore, we evaluated which inflammatory cells are present and studied the influence of anti-neutrophil serum (ANS) on peritoneal tumour recurrence. METHODS In a peritoneal trauma model in rats, postoperative lavage fluids were collected and separated into cellular and supernatant components. Both components were injected in naïve rats together with CC531s colon carcinoma cells. In a second experiment, rats were treated with one or three doses of ANS. RESULTS Intraperitoneal injection of naïve recipients with inflammatory cells or supernatant resulted in significant tumour recurrence. Severe peritoneal trauma provoked significant intra-abdominal neutrophil influx which could be prevented by ANS. Treatment with one dose did not affect blood cell counts and significantly reduced tumour recurrence. Treatment with three doses of ANS decreased blood lymphocytes, monocytes, and neutrophils and induced tumour load. CONCLUSIONS Neutrophils play a crucial role in postoperative adhesion and growth of spilled tumour cells after surgical peritoneal trauma. Prevention of peritoneal neutrophil influx reduces local tumour recurrence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M P van den Tol
- Department of Surgical Oncology, VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|