1
|
Lugtenberg RT, Fischer MJ, de Jongh F, Kobayashi K, Inoue K, Matsuda A, Kubota K, Weijl N, Yamaoka K, Ramai SRS, Nortier JWR, Putter H, Gelderblom H, Kaptein AA, Kroep JR. Using a quality of life (QoL)-monitor: preliminary results of a randomized trial in Dutch patients with early breast cancer. Qual Life Res 2020; 29:2961-2975. [PMID: 32529343 PMCID: PMC7591431 DOI: 10.1007/s11136-020-02549-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/08/2020] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Purpose The diagnosis and treatment of cancer negatively affect patients’ physical, functional and psychological wellbeing. Patients’ needs for care cannot be addressed unless they are recognized by healthcare providers (HCPs). The use of quality of life (QoL) assessments with feedback to HCPs might facilitate the identification and discussion of QoL-topics. Methods 113 patients with stage I–IIIB breast cancer treated with chemotherapy were included in this randomized controlled trial. Patients were randomly allocated to receive either usual care, or usual care with an intervention consisting of a QoL-monitor assessing QoL, distress and care needs before every chemotherapy cycle visit. Patients completed questionnaires regarding QoL, illness perceptions, self-efficacy, and satisfaction with communication. From the 2nd visit onwards, patients in the intervention arm and their HCPs received a copy of the QoL overview and results were shown in patients’ medical files. Audio-recordings and patients’ self-reports were used to investigate effects on communication, patient management and patient-wellbeing. A composite score for communication was calculated by summing the number of QoL-topics discussed during each consultation. Results Use of the QoL-monitor resulted in a higher communication score (0.7 topics increase per visit, p = 0.04), especially regarding the disease-specific and psychosocial issues (p < 0.01). There were no differences in patient management, QoL, illness perceptions or distress. Patients in the experimental arm (n = 60) had higher scores on satisfaction with communication (p < 0.05). Conclusions Use of a QoL-monitor during chemotherapy in patients with early breast cancer might result in a more frequent discussion of QoL-topics, associated with high levels of patients’ satisfaction. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1007/s11136-020-02549-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R T Lugtenberg
- Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, P.O. Box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands.
| | - M J Fischer
- Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, P.O. Box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands.,Department of Medical Psychology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - F de Jongh
- Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, P.O. Box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands.,Department of Medical Psychology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - K Kobayashi
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Saitama International Medical Center, Saitama, Japan
| | - K Inoue
- Division of Breast Oncology, Saitama Cancer Center, Saitama, Japan
| | - A Matsuda
- Department of Hygiene and Public Health, Teikyo University Graduate School of Public Health, Tokyo, Japan
| | - K Kubota
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine and Oncology, Nippon Medical School, Saitama, Japan
| | - N Weijl
- Department of Medical Oncology, HMC Bronovo Hospital, The Hague, The Netherlands
| | - K Yamaoka
- Department of Hygiene and Public Health, Teikyo University Graduate School of Public Health, Tokyo, Japan
| | - S R S Ramai
- Department of Pulmonology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - J W R Nortier
- Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, P.O. Box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - H Putter
- Department of Medical Statistics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - H Gelderblom
- Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, P.O. Box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - A A Kaptein
- Department of Medical Psychology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - J R Kroep
- Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, P.O. Box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Blok EJ, Kroep JR, Meershoek-Klein Kranenbarg E, Duijm-de Carpentier M, Nortier JWR, Rutgers EJT, van de Velde CJH. Abstract P3-12-08: Evaluation of treatment compliance during extended endocrine therapy; secondary analysis of the IDEAL trial. Cancer Res 2018. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs17-p3-12-08] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
In the first clinical trial reports about extended endocrine therapy in early breast cancer, treatment compliance appeared as a major concern. Earlier, it was shown in the IDEAL trial that approximately 35% of all patients stopped therapy before the allocated time. This additional study was conducted to evaluate the factors contributing to early treatment discontinuation.
Methods: In the IDEAL trial, a total of 1824 patients were randomized between either 2.5 or 5 years of extended letrozole, after 5 years of any adjuvant endocrine therapy. Only eligible patients who started therapy were included in the analysis. Adverse events were collected until 30 days after last treatment dose Reasons for ending therapy were collected prospectively at the time of treatment discontinuation.
Results: The majority of early treatment discontinuation was caused by adverse events (AEs) (n=372, 20.4% of all patients, 58% of all early treatment discontinuations). The most frequently reported AEs associated to treatment discontinuation were arthralgia (n=71, 9.9% of AEs associated treatment discontinuation), fatigue (n=48, 6.7%), depression (n=47, 6.5%), hot flashes (n=47, 6.5%) and alopecia (n=39, 5.4%). Of all AEs associated to early discontinuation, 86% was grade 1 or 2 (table 1). All grade 5 events were not associated to therapy.
Table 1 - Overview of adverse events most frequently associated to early treatment discontinuation Grade 1Grade 2Grade 3Grade 4Grade 5TotalArthralgia2236121071Fatigue192610148Depression202160047Hot flashes162092047Alopecia28731039Total (all AEs)30231680136720
Furthermore, the influence of previous type of adjuvant endocrine therapy was evaluated. Of all patients initiallytreated with 5 years of tamoxifen, 29% stopped due to an AE. In contrast, patients who were treated with aromatase inhibitors during the first 5 years, either with monotherapy or after 2-3 years of tamoxifen, stopped due to AEs in 22% and 18% respectively (Pearson Chi-square p-value 0.001). The average number of AEs per patient per previous treatment group was 2.27 for tamoxifen monotherapy, 2.03 for AI monotherapy and 1.73 in the sequential group. Corrected for the number of AEs in each group, patients pre-treated with 5 years of tamoxifen had a chance of treatment discontinuation of 12.7% per AE, compared to 10.8% and 10.4% for AI monotherapy and sequential therapy respectively. Additionally, of patients that completed regular adjuvant therapy between 1 and 2 years before randomization, 34% stopped due to adverse events. In contrast, of patients that completed therapy within 6 months before randomization stopped in 19% of all cases (Pearson Chi-square p-value <0.001).
Conclusion: We have shown that adverse events are an important factor in early treatment discontinuation. Furthermore, the relation between adverse events and early discontinuation is influenced by the type of earlier therapy, with the highest rate of discontinuation for AI-naïve patients. This suggests that after 5 years of tamoxifen, patients are more inclined to stop therapy when encountering new AI-related adverse events compared to patients who were pre-treated with an AI.
Citation Format: Blok EJ, Kroep JR, Meershoek-Klein Kranenbarg E, Duijm-de Carpentier M, Nortier JWR, Rutgers EJTh, van de Velde CJH. Evaluation of treatment compliance during extended endocrine therapy; secondary analysis of the IDEAL trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2017 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2017 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-12-08.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- EJ Blok
- Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands; Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - JR Kroep
- Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands; Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | | | - M Duijm-de Carpentier
- Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands; Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - JWR Nortier
- Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands; Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - EJTh Rutgers
- Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands; Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - CJH van de Velde
- Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands; Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Fischer MJ, Inoue K, Matsuda A, Kroep JR, Nagai S, Tozuka K, Momiyama M, Weijl NI, Langemeijer-Bosman D, Ramai SRS, Nortier JWR, Putter H, Yamaoka K, Kubota K, Kobayashi K, Kaptein AA. Cross-cultural comparison of breast cancer patients' Quality of Life in the Netherlands and Japan. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2017; 166:459-471. [PMID: 28762012 PMCID: PMC5668344 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-017-4417-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2017] [Accepted: 07/24/2017] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Purpose Cultural differences are hypothesized to influence patients’ Quality of Life (QoL) reports. However, there is a lack of empirical cross-cultural studies comparing QoL of patients with cancer. This study aims to compare QoL of women with breast cancer in the Netherlands and Japan, and to investigate the association of QoL with sociodemographic, clinical, and psychological variables (illness perceptions). Methods Dutch (n = 116) and Japanese (n = 148) women with early breast cancer undergoing chemotherapy completed the EORTC QLQ-C30 and Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire immediately before their second cycle of chemotherapy. Results Dutch women reported poorer Physical, Role, Emotional, and Cognitive functioning than Japanese women. Additionally, illness perceptions were significantly different in Japan and the Netherlands, but these did not vary across treatment type. In Japan, QoL of women receiving AC-chemotherapy was better than that of women receiving FEC-chemotherapy, whereas in the Netherlands, QoL did not vary as a function of chemotherapy. Illness perceptions about symptom severity, adverse consequences, and emotional representations were negatively related to most domains of patients’ QoL in both countries. Adding illness perceptions as covariates to the ANOVA analyses rendered the effects of country and treatment type on QoL non-significant. Conclusions Comparing Dutch and Japanese women with early breast cancer revealed important differences in treatment modalities and illness perceptions which both appear to influence QoL. Perceptions about cancer have been found to vary across cultures, and our study suggests that these perceptions should be considered when performing cross-cultural studies focusing on patient-reported outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M J Fischer
- Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, 2300 RC Leiden, P.O. Box 9600, Leiden, The Netherlands.
| | - K Inoue
- Division of Breast Oncology, Saitama Cancer Center, Saitama, Japan
| | - A Matsuda
- Department of Hygiene and Public Health, Teikyo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - J R Kroep
- Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, 2300 RC Leiden, P.O. Box 9600, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - S Nagai
- Division of Breast Oncology, Saitama Cancer Center, Saitama, Japan
| | - K Tozuka
- Division of Breast Oncology, Saitama Cancer Center, Saitama, Japan
| | - M Momiyama
- Division of Breast Oncology, Saitama Cancer Center, Saitama, Japan
| | - N I Weijl
- Department of Medical Oncology, Medical Center Haaglanden, The Hague, The Netherlands
| | - D Langemeijer-Bosman
- Department of Medical Oncology, Medical Center Haaglanden, The Hague, The Netherlands
| | - S R S Ramai
- Department of Pulmonology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - J W R Nortier
- Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, 2300 RC Leiden, P.O. Box 9600, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - H Putter
- Department of Medical Statistics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - K Yamaoka
- Graduate School of Public Health, Teikyo University, Saitama, Japan
| | - K Kubota
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine and Oncology, Nippon Medical School, Saitama, Japan
| | - K Kobayashi
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Saitama International Medical Center, Saitama, Japan
| | - A A Kaptein
- Unit of Psychology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Vliek SB, Meershoek-Klein Kranenbarg E, van Rossum AGJ, Tanis BC, Putter H, van der Velden AWG, Hendriks MP, van Bochove A, van Riet Y, van Leeuwen-Stok AE, Tjan-Heijnen VCG, Kroep JR, Nortier JWR, van de Velde CJH, Linn SC. Abstract S6-02: The efficacy and safety of the addition of ibandronate to adjuvant hormonal therapy in postmenopausal women with hormone-receptor positive early breast cancer. First results of the TEAM IIB trial (BOOG 2006-04). Cancer Res 2017. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs16-s6-02] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background:
Results of clinical trials concerning adjuvant bisphosphonates for the prevention of (bone) metastases in patients with early breast cancer are conflicting. A recent large meta-analysis, however, suggests that bisphosphonates reduce the incidence of (bone) metastases and improve skeletal-related events in early breast cancer patients. Subgroup analyses show that postmenopausal women seem to benefit the most. In this subgroup a modest overall survival benefit was observed with the addition of adjuvant bisphosphonates to standard adjuvant systemic therapy (EBCTCG, Lancet, 2015). TEAM IIB, a randomized phase III study (ISRCTN17633610), prospectively investigates the value of the addition of ibandronate to adjuvant hormonal therapy in postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer.
Methods:
Postmenopausal women with stage I-III breast cancer and an indication for adjuvant hormonal treatment were randomized to receive at least 5 years of hormonal therapy (tamoxifen followed by at least 2-3 years exemestane, or in case of high risk at least 5 years of exemestane) with or without ibandronate 50mg orally, once daily for three years. Primary endpoint was disease-free survival (DFS). Secondary endpoints included time to and rate of bone metastases, other sites of recurrence, overall survival and safety. The study was amended because of slower than anticipated accrual and the sample size calculations were amended accordingly in June 2009. To detect a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.615 with a 2-sided alpha of 0.05 and a power of 0.8, 139 DFS-events were required in the intention-to-treat population.
Results: Between February 2007 and May 2014, 1116 patients were enrolled in 37 hospitals in the Netherlands of whom 40% had positive axillary lymph nodes and 56% of all patients received (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy (>95% anthracyclines, 69% taxanes). Baseline characteristics were well balanced. At September 9, 2016, 143 DFS events had been reported. Median follow-up was 4.6 years and 80 patients were still on ibandronate treatment. Adherence to 3 years ibandronate was 67%, 21 patients randomized to receive ibandronate never started. 19 patients, of whom 9 in the control group were excluded because of major ineligibility.
In the ibandronate treated group 3-year DFS was 94.4% versus 90.8% in the control group (HR 0.84; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.60-1.17). In total, 48 patients in the ibandronate versus 45 in the control group died, of whom 18 (37,5%) versus 28 (62,2%) of breast cancer. 3 years after randomization 1.6% of ibandronate treated patients developed bone metastases versus 4.6% in patients who were treated with adjuvant hormonal therapy only (HR 0.76; [CI] 0.43-1.32). 14 (29,2%) versus 9 (20%) of patients died because of secondary malignancies respectively.
There was no significant difference in creatinine clearance during the first three years after randomization. 36 Serious adverse events (SAEs) were reported in the ibandronate group versus 51 in the control group. Of patients randomized to ibandronate 4 developed osteonecrosis, but without residual complaints.
Conclusion: So far, at a median follow-up of 4.6 years there is no statistically significant benefit from adding ibandronate to adjuvant hormonal treatment in postmenopausal women with hormone-receptor positive early breast cancer. However, since hazard rates are in favor of ibandronate longer follow-up is warranted before final conclusions can be drawn.
Citation Format: Vliek SB, Meershoek-Klein Kranenbarg E, van Rossum AGJ, Tanis BC, Putter H, van der Velden AWG, Hendriks MP, van Bochove A, van Riet Y, van Leeuwen-Stok AE, Tjan-Heijnen VCG, Kroep JR, Nortier JWR, van de Velde CJH, Linn SC. The efficacy and safety of the addition of ibandronate to adjuvant hormonal therapy in postmenopausal women with hormone-receptor positive early breast cancer. First results of the TEAM IIB trial (BOOG 2006-04) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2016 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2016 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(4 Suppl):Abstract nr S6-02.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- SB Vliek
- Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands; Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, Netherlands; Martini Ziekenhuis, Groningen, Netherlands; Northwest Clinics, Alkmaar, Netherlands; Zaans Medisch Centrum, Zaandam, Netherlands; Catharina Ziekenhuis, Eindhoven, Netherlands; Groene Hart Ziekenhuis, Gouda, Netherlands; Dutch Breast Cancer Research Group, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - E Meershoek-Klein Kranenbarg
- Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands; Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, Netherlands; Martini Ziekenhuis, Groningen, Netherlands; Northwest Clinics, Alkmaar, Netherlands; Zaans Medisch Centrum, Zaandam, Netherlands; Catharina Ziekenhuis, Eindhoven, Netherlands; Groene Hart Ziekenhuis, Gouda, Netherlands; Dutch Breast Cancer Research Group, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - AGJ van Rossum
- Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands; Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, Netherlands; Martini Ziekenhuis, Groningen, Netherlands; Northwest Clinics, Alkmaar, Netherlands; Zaans Medisch Centrum, Zaandam, Netherlands; Catharina Ziekenhuis, Eindhoven, Netherlands; Groene Hart Ziekenhuis, Gouda, Netherlands; Dutch Breast Cancer Research Group, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - BC Tanis
- Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands; Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, Netherlands; Martini Ziekenhuis, Groningen, Netherlands; Northwest Clinics, Alkmaar, Netherlands; Zaans Medisch Centrum, Zaandam, Netherlands; Catharina Ziekenhuis, Eindhoven, Netherlands; Groene Hart Ziekenhuis, Gouda, Netherlands; Dutch Breast Cancer Research Group, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - H Putter
- Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands; Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, Netherlands; Martini Ziekenhuis, Groningen, Netherlands; Northwest Clinics, Alkmaar, Netherlands; Zaans Medisch Centrum, Zaandam, Netherlands; Catharina Ziekenhuis, Eindhoven, Netherlands; Groene Hart Ziekenhuis, Gouda, Netherlands; Dutch Breast Cancer Research Group, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - AWG van der Velden
- Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands; Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, Netherlands; Martini Ziekenhuis, Groningen, Netherlands; Northwest Clinics, Alkmaar, Netherlands; Zaans Medisch Centrum, Zaandam, Netherlands; Catharina Ziekenhuis, Eindhoven, Netherlands; Groene Hart Ziekenhuis, Gouda, Netherlands; Dutch Breast Cancer Research Group, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - MP Hendriks
- Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands; Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, Netherlands; Martini Ziekenhuis, Groningen, Netherlands; Northwest Clinics, Alkmaar, Netherlands; Zaans Medisch Centrum, Zaandam, Netherlands; Catharina Ziekenhuis, Eindhoven, Netherlands; Groene Hart Ziekenhuis, Gouda, Netherlands; Dutch Breast Cancer Research Group, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - A van Bochove
- Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands; Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, Netherlands; Martini Ziekenhuis, Groningen, Netherlands; Northwest Clinics, Alkmaar, Netherlands; Zaans Medisch Centrum, Zaandam, Netherlands; Catharina Ziekenhuis, Eindhoven, Netherlands; Groene Hart Ziekenhuis, Gouda, Netherlands; Dutch Breast Cancer Research Group, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Y van Riet
- Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands; Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, Netherlands; Martini Ziekenhuis, Groningen, Netherlands; Northwest Clinics, Alkmaar, Netherlands; Zaans Medisch Centrum, Zaandam, Netherlands; Catharina Ziekenhuis, Eindhoven, Netherlands; Groene Hart Ziekenhuis, Gouda, Netherlands; Dutch Breast Cancer Research Group, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - AE van Leeuwen-Stok
- Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands; Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, Netherlands; Martini Ziekenhuis, Groningen, Netherlands; Northwest Clinics, Alkmaar, Netherlands; Zaans Medisch Centrum, Zaandam, Netherlands; Catharina Ziekenhuis, Eindhoven, Netherlands; Groene Hart Ziekenhuis, Gouda, Netherlands; Dutch Breast Cancer Research Group, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - VCG Tjan-Heijnen
- Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands; Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, Netherlands; Martini Ziekenhuis, Groningen, Netherlands; Northwest Clinics, Alkmaar, Netherlands; Zaans Medisch Centrum, Zaandam, Netherlands; Catharina Ziekenhuis, Eindhoven, Netherlands; Groene Hart Ziekenhuis, Gouda, Netherlands; Dutch Breast Cancer Research Group, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - JR Kroep
- Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands; Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, Netherlands; Martini Ziekenhuis, Groningen, Netherlands; Northwest Clinics, Alkmaar, Netherlands; Zaans Medisch Centrum, Zaandam, Netherlands; Catharina Ziekenhuis, Eindhoven, Netherlands; Groene Hart Ziekenhuis, Gouda, Netherlands; Dutch Breast Cancer Research Group, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - JWR Nortier
- Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands; Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, Netherlands; Martini Ziekenhuis, Groningen, Netherlands; Northwest Clinics, Alkmaar, Netherlands; Zaans Medisch Centrum, Zaandam, Netherlands; Catharina Ziekenhuis, Eindhoven, Netherlands; Groene Hart Ziekenhuis, Gouda, Netherlands; Dutch Breast Cancer Research Group, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - CJH van de Velde
- Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands; Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, Netherlands; Martini Ziekenhuis, Groningen, Netherlands; Northwest Clinics, Alkmaar, Netherlands; Zaans Medisch Centrum, Zaandam, Netherlands; Catharina Ziekenhuis, Eindhoven, Netherlands; Groene Hart Ziekenhuis, Gouda, Netherlands; Dutch Breast Cancer Research Group, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - SC Linn
- Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands; Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, Netherlands; Martini Ziekenhuis, Groningen, Netherlands; Northwest Clinics, Alkmaar, Netherlands; Zaans Medisch Centrum, Zaandam, Netherlands; Catharina Ziekenhuis, Eindhoven, Netherlands; Groene Hart Ziekenhuis, Gouda, Netherlands; Dutch Breast Cancer Research Group, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Blok EJ, Derks MGM, Kuppen PJK, Meershoek-Klein Kranenbarg EM, Engels CC, Liefers GJ, Putter H, Seynaeve CM, Kroep JR, Nortier JWR, Rea DW, Hasenburg A, Markopoulos CJ, Paridaens R, Bartlett JMS, van de Velde CJH. Abstract PD2-07: 10-year follow-up and biomarker discovery for adjuvant endocrine therapy; results of the TEAM trial. Cancer Res 2017. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs16-pd2-07] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Optimal endocrine therapy for postmenopausal, hormone-receptor positive (HR+) early breast cancer remains a point of discussion. The Tamoxifen Exemestane Adjuvant Multinational (TEAM) phase III trial showed no significant differences for disease free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) at 5 years between exemestane monotherapy and sequential treatment (tamoxifen followed by exemestane). We now report disease related outcomes at 10 years of follow-up (FU), and an explorative analysis to assess the predictive value of clinicopathological and immune-related biomarkers.
In the TEAM trial, postmenopausal women with HR+ positive early breast cancer were randomly assigned to exemestane alone or sequential therapy. For this analysis, TEAM patients from countries that completed 10 years of FU were included. The primary endpoint was DFS at ten years, analyzed by intention to treat. Secondary outcomes were OS and cumulative incidence of relapse. An explorative per protocol analysis for relapse free survival (RFS) was performed to identify predictive pathological and immunological biomarkers, including centrally determined ER (ER-poor 0-6 vs ER-rich 7-8) and PR (0-4 vs 5-8) Allred scores, and the immunological markers CD8, FoxP3, classical HLA class 1 and HLA-G which were described earlier (Engels et al, Breast Cancer Treat Res, 2015).
In total, 6120 patients were eligible for the current analysis, 3075 patients with exemestane monotherapy and 3045 patients randomized to sequential treatment. Median follow up was 9.83 years. DFS was 66.8% in the exemestane group and 66.8% in the sequential group (hazard ratio (HR) 0.96, 95% CI 0.88-1.05, p=0.389). OS was 74% in the exemestane, and 73% in the sequential group, respectively (HR 0.98, 95% CI 0.89-1.09, p=0.737). The cumulative incidence of relapse was 20% and 22% in the exemestane and sequential groups, respectively (HR 0.88, 95% CI 0.79-0.99, p=0.031).
In the explorative per protocol analysis (n=4041), Allred score were available for 2996 patients; immunological markers for 1754 patients. Patients with above median numbers of FoxP3-positive T-cells showed a benefit of exemestane monotherapy for RFS (HR 0.56, 95% CI 0.42-0.75, p<0.001) in contrast to patients with low numbers of FoxP3-positive cells (HR 1.0, 95% CI 0.77-1.32, p=0.97, p-value for interaction 0.004). A high tumor differentiation grade was associated with more benefit for exemestane monotherapy (grade 1/2 HR 0.78, 95% CI 0.65-0.94, p=0.01, grade 3/4 HR 0.61, 95% CI 0.49-0.75, p<0.001), with a borderline significant interaction (p=0.07). ER Allred score showed a borderline significant treatment by marker effect interaction (ER-rich HR 0.69 (95% CI 0.58-0.81, p<0.001); ER-poor HR 0.94 (95% CI 0.65-1.34, p=0.71, p for interaction 0.12).
After ten years of follow up, both exemestane monotherapy and sequential therapy remain appropriate options for postmenopausal HR+ early breast cancer patients. Interestingly, the number of regulatory T-cells was a predictive factor for the benefit of exemestane monotherapy, which implies a role of the local immune system in endocrine therapy. Furthermore, data suggested that patients with a higher differentiation grade or ER-rich tumor derive more benefit from exemestane monotherapy.
Citation Format: Blok EJ, Derks MGM, Kuppen PJK, Meershoek-Klein Kranenbarg EM, Engels CC, Liefers G-J, Putter H, Seynaeve CM, Kroep JR, Nortier JWR, Rea DW, Hasenburg A, Markopoulos CJ, Paridaens R, Bartlett JMS, van de Velde CJH. 10-year follow-up and biomarker discovery for adjuvant endocrine therapy; results of the TEAM trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2016 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2016 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PD2-07.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- EJ Blok
- Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands; Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands; University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom; University Hospital Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany; Athens University Medical School, Athens, Greece; University Hospital Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Transformative Pathology, Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Canada
| | - MGM Derks
- Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands; Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands; University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom; University Hospital Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany; Athens University Medical School, Athens, Greece; University Hospital Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Transformative Pathology, Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Canada
| | - PJK Kuppen
- Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands; Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands; University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom; University Hospital Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany; Athens University Medical School, Athens, Greece; University Hospital Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Transformative Pathology, Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Canada
| | - EM Meershoek-Klein Kranenbarg
- Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands; Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands; University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom; University Hospital Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany; Athens University Medical School, Athens, Greece; University Hospital Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Transformative Pathology, Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Canada
| | - CC Engels
- Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands; Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands; University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom; University Hospital Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany; Athens University Medical School, Athens, Greece; University Hospital Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Transformative Pathology, Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Canada
| | - G-J Liefers
- Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands; Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands; University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom; University Hospital Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany; Athens University Medical School, Athens, Greece; University Hospital Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Transformative Pathology, Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Canada
| | - H Putter
- Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands; Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands; University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom; University Hospital Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany; Athens University Medical School, Athens, Greece; University Hospital Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Transformative Pathology, Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Canada
| | - CM Seynaeve
- Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands; Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands; University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom; University Hospital Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany; Athens University Medical School, Athens, Greece; University Hospital Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Transformative Pathology, Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Canada
| | - JR Kroep
- Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands; Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands; University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom; University Hospital Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany; Athens University Medical School, Athens, Greece; University Hospital Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Transformative Pathology, Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Canada
| | - JWR Nortier
- Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands; Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands; University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom; University Hospital Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany; Athens University Medical School, Athens, Greece; University Hospital Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Transformative Pathology, Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Canada
| | - DW Rea
- Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands; Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands; University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom; University Hospital Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany; Athens University Medical School, Athens, Greece; University Hospital Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Transformative Pathology, Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Canada
| | - A Hasenburg
- Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands; Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands; University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom; University Hospital Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany; Athens University Medical School, Athens, Greece; University Hospital Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Transformative Pathology, Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Canada
| | - CJ Markopoulos
- Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands; Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands; University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom; University Hospital Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany; Athens University Medical School, Athens, Greece; University Hospital Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Transformative Pathology, Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Canada
| | - R Paridaens
- Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands; Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands; University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom; University Hospital Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany; Athens University Medical School, Athens, Greece; University Hospital Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Transformative Pathology, Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Canada
| | - JMS Bartlett
- Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands; Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands; University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom; University Hospital Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany; Athens University Medical School, Athens, Greece; University Hospital Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Transformative Pathology, Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Canada
| | - CJH van de Velde
- Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands; Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands; University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom; University Hospital Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany; Athens University Medical School, Athens, Greece; University Hospital Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Transformative Pathology, Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Fontein DBY, Charehbili A, Nortier JWR, Putter H, Kranenbarg EMK, Kroep JR, Linn SC, van de Velde CJH. Specific adverse events are associated with response to exemestane therapy in postmenopausal breast cancer patients: Results from the TEAMIIA study (BOOG2006-04). Eur J Surg Oncol 2016; 43:619-624. [PMID: 28017458 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2016.07.146] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2016] [Revised: 06/26/2016] [Accepted: 07/04/2016] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE In the adjuvant setting, specific adverse events (AEs) such as vasomotor symptoms (VMS) and musculoskeletal AEs are associated with relapse-free survival in aromatase inhibitor (AI)-treated patients. In the neoadjuvant setting, specific AEs may be associated with tumor response to AIs as well. METHODS Between 2007 and 2012, 107 patients participated in the prospective TEAMIIA trial, a prospective, phase II trial investigating 6 months of neoadjuvant exemestane in patients with strongly ER-positive breast cancer. Radiological response (≥30% decrease in tumor size) was studied in relation to VMSs and MSAEs. Pearson's Chi-Square tests and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to evaluate of statistical significance (p < 0.05). RESULTS Out of 102 patients 26 patients (25.4%) experienced at least one episode of VMS and 27 patients (26.4%) experienced MSAE. Out of 240 reported adverse events, 71 were specific AEs (40 MSAEs, 31 VMSs). Radiological response was greater in patients who reported VMSs compared to patients who did not (70.8% vs. 49.3%, multivariate OR 2.91, 95% C.I. 1.03-8.26, P = 0.045). No significant advantage towards better response was observed in patients who experienced MSAEs (60.0% vs. 53.3%, univariate OR 1.33, 95% C.I. 0.53-3.38, P = 0.545). CONCLUSION VMSs are associated with tumor response to neoadjuvant exemestane and may be useful for predicting treatment outcomes of AI treatment at an early stage in patients treated with neoadjuvant AIs.
Collapse
MESH Headings
- Aged
- Aged, 80 and over
- Androstadienes/adverse effects
- Aromatase Inhibitors/adverse effects
- Arthralgia/chemically induced
- Arthritis/chemically induced
- Breast Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging
- Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy
- Breast Neoplasms/metabolism
- Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/diagnostic imaging
- Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/drug therapy
- Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/metabolism
- Carcinoma, Lobular/diagnostic imaging
- Carcinoma, Lobular/drug therapy
- Carcinoma, Lobular/metabolism
- Disease-Free Survival
- Female
- Hot Flashes/chemically induced
- Humans
- Joint Diseases/chemically induced
- Logistic Models
- Magnetic Resonance Imaging
- Mammography
- Mastectomy
- Middle Aged
- Multivariate Analysis
- Musculoskeletal Diseases/chemically induced
- Myalgia/chemically induced
- Neoadjuvant Therapy
- Odds Ratio
- Osteoporosis/chemically induced
- Postmenopause
- Prognosis
- Receptors, Estrogen/metabolism
- Treatment Outcome
- Ultrasonography, Mammary
- Vasomotor System
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D B Y Fontein
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - A Charehbili
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands; Department of Clinical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
| | - J W R Nortier
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - H Putter
- Department of Medical Statistics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | | | - J R Kroep
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - S C Linn
- Department of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - C J H van de Velde
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Komen MMC, Smorenburg CH, Nortier JWR, van der Ploeg T, van den Hurk CJG, van der Hoeven JJM. Results of scalp cooling during anthracycline containing chemotherapy depend on scalp skin temperature. Breast 2016; 30:105-110. [PMID: 27689316 DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2016.09.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2015] [Revised: 08/16/2016] [Accepted: 09/10/2016] [Indexed: 10/20/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The success of scalp cooling in preventing or reducing chemotherapy induced alopecia (CIA) is highly variable between patients undergoing similar chemotherapy regimens. A decrease of the scalp skin temperature seems to be an important factor, but data on the optimum temperature reached by scalp cooling to prevent CIA are lacking. This study investigated the relation between scalp skin temperature and its efficacy to prevent CIA. MATERIALS AND METHODS In this explorative study, scalp skin temperature was measured during scalp cooling in 62 breast cancer patients undergoing up to six cycles of anthracycline containing chemotherapy. Scalp skin temperature was measured by using two thermocouples at both temporal sides of the head. The primary end-point was the need for a wig or other head covering. RESULTS Maximal cooling was reached after 45 min and was continued for 90 min after chemotherapy infusion. The scalp skin temperature after 45 min cooling varied from 10 °C to 31 °C, resulting in a mean scalp skin temperature of 19 °C (SEM: 0,4). Intrapersonal scalp skin temperatures during cooling were consistent for each chemotherapy cycle (ANOVA: P = 0,855). Thirteen out of 62 patients (21%) did not require a wig or other head covering. They appeared to have a significantly lower mean scalp skin temperature (18 °C; SEM: 0,7) compared to patients with alopecia (20 °C; SEM: 0,5) (P = 0,01). CONCLUSION The efficacy of scalp cooling during chemotherapy is temperature dependent. A precise cut-off point could not be detected, but the best results seem to be obtained when the scalp temperature decreases below 18 °C. TRIALREGISTER. NL NTR NUMBER 3082.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M M C Komen
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Oncology, Noordwest Ziekenhuisgroep, Wilhelminalaan 12, Alkmaar, 1815 JD, The Netherlands.
| | - C H Smorenburg
- Department of Medical Oncology, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Plesmanlaan 121, Amsterdam, 1066 CX, The Netherlands.
| | - J W R Nortier
- Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Centre, PO Box 9600, Leiden, 2300 RC, The Netherlands.
| | - T van der Ploeg
- Science Department, Noordwest Ziekenhuisgroep, Wilhelminalaan 12, Alkmaar, 1815 JD, The Netherlands.
| | - C J G van den Hurk
- Comprehensive Cancer Organisation the Netherlands, PO Box 231, Eindhoven, 5600 AE, The Netherlands.
| | - J J M van der Hoeven
- Department of Medical Oncology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, 6525 GA, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Kroep JR, Charehbili A, Coleman RE, Aft RL, Hasegawa Y, Winter MC, Weilbaecher K, Akazawa K, Hinsley S, Putter H, Liefers GJ, Nortier JWR, Kohno N. Effects of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with or without zoledronic acid on pathological response: A meta-analysis of randomised trials. Eur J Cancer 2015; 54:57-63. [PMID: 26722766 PMCID: PMC4928630 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2015.10.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2015] [Revised: 10/12/2015] [Accepted: 10/17/2015] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Purpose The addition of bisphosphonates to adjuvant therapy improves survival in postmenopausal breast cancer (BC) patients. We report a meta-analysis of four randomised trials of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (CT) +/− zoledronic acid (ZA) in stage II/III BC to investigate the potential for enhancing the pathological response. Methods Individual patient data from four prospective randomised clinical trials reporting the effect of the addition of ZA on the pathological response after neoadjuvant CT were pooled. Primary outcomes were pathological complete response in the breast (pCRb) and in the breast and lymph nodes (pCR). Trial-level and individual patient data meta-analyses were done. Predefined subgroup-analyses were performed for postmenopausal women and patients with triple-negative BC. Results pCRb and pCR data were available in 735 and 552 patients respectively. In the total study population ZA addition to neoadjuvant CT did not increase pCRb or pCR rates. However, in postmenopausal patients, the addition of ZA resulted in a significant, near doubling of the pCRb rate (10.8% for CT only versus 17.7% with CT+ZA; odds ratio [OR] 2.14, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.01–4.55) and a non-significant benefit of the pCR rate (7.8% for CT only versus 14.6% with CT+ZA; OR 2.62, 95% CI 0.90–7.62). In patients with triple-negative BC a trend was observed favouring CT+ZA. Conclusion This meta-analysis shows no impact from the addition of ZA to neoadjuvant CT on pCR. However, as has been seen in the adjuvant setting, the addition of ZA to neoadjuvant CT may augment the effects of CT in postmenopausal patients with BC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J R Kroep
- Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - A Charehbili
- Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - R E Coleman
- Sheffield Cancer Research Centre, Weston Park Hospital, Sheffield, United Kingdom
| | - R L Aft
- Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, USA
| | - Y Hasegawa
- Hirosaki Municipal Hospital, Aomori, Japan
| | - M C Winter
- Sheffield Cancer Research Centre, Weston Park Hospital, Sheffield, United Kingdom
| | - K Weilbaecher
- Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, USA
| | | | - S Hinsley
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - H Putter
- Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - G J Liefers
- Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - J W R Nortier
- Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - N Kohno
- Kobe Kaisei Hospital, Kobe, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Charehbili A, Hamdy NAT, Smit VTHBM, Kessels L, van Bochove A, van Laarhoven HW, Putter H, Meershoek-Klein Kranenbarg E, van Leeuwen-Stok AE, van der Hoeven JJM, van de Velde CJH, Nortier JWR, Kroep JR. Vitamin D (25-0H D3) status and pathological response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in stage II/III breast cancer: Data from the NEOZOTAC trial (BOOG 10-01). Breast 2015; 25:69-74. [PMID: 26614548 DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2015.10.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2015] [Revised: 10/17/2015] [Accepted: 10/20/2015] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Serum levels of 25-OH vitamin D3 (vitamin D) have been shown to be prognostic for disease-free survival in patients with breast cancer. We investigated the predictive value of these levels for pathological response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer taking part in the NEOZOTAC phase-III trial. Additionally, the effect of chemotherapy on vitamin D levels was studied. MATERIALS AND METHODS Serum vitamin D was measured at baseline and before the last cycle of chemotherapy. The relationship between these measurements and clinical outcome, as defined by pathological complete response in breast and lymph nodes (pCR) was examined. RESULTS Baseline and end of treatment vitamin D data were available in 169 and 91 patients, respectively. Median baseline vitamin D values were 58.0 nmol/L. In patients treated with chemotherapy only, serum vitamin D levels decreased during neoadjuvant chemotherapy (median decrease of 16 nmol/L, P = 0.003). The prevalence of vitamin D levels < 50 nmol/L increased from 38.3% at baseline to 55.9% after chemotherapy. In the total population, baseline and end of therapy vitamin D levels were not related to pathological response. No associations were found between pCR and vitamin D level changes. CONCLUSION The significant decrease in vitamin D post-neoadjuvant chemotherapy suggests that vitamin D levels should be monitored and in case of decrease of vitamin D levels, correction may be beneficial for skeletal health and possibly breast cancer outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Charehbili
- Leiden University Medical Center, Department of Medical Oncology, The Netherlands; Leiden University Medical Center, Department of Surgery, The Netherlands
| | - N A T Hamdy
- Leiden University Medical Center, Department of Endocrinology & Metabolic Diseases, The Netherlands
| | - V T H B M Smit
- Leiden University Medical Center, Department of Pathology, The Netherlands
| | - L Kessels
- Deventer Ziekenhuis, Department of Clinical Oncology, The Netherlands
| | - A van Bochove
- Zaans Medisch Centrum, Department of Clinical Oncology, The Netherlands
| | - H W van Laarhoven
- Radboud Universiteit Nijmegen/AMC Amsterdam, Department of Medical Oncology, The Netherlands
| | - H Putter
- Leiden University Medical Center, Department of Medical Statistics, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - J J M van der Hoeven
- Leiden University Medical Center, Department of Medical Oncology, The Netherlands
| | - C J H van de Velde
- Leiden University Medical Center, Department of Surgery, The Netherlands
| | - J W R Nortier
- Leiden University Medical Center, Department of Medical Oncology, The Netherlands
| | - J R Kroep
- Leiden University Medical Center, Department of Medical Oncology, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Charehbili A, de Groot S, van der Straaten T, Swen JJ, Pijl H, Gelderblom H, van de Velde CJH, Nortier JWR, Guchelaar HJ, Kroep JR. Exploratory analysis of candidate germline gene polymorphisms in breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant anthracycline-containing chemotherapy and associations with febrile neutropenia. Pharmacogenomics 2015; 16:1267-76. [PMID: 26289095 DOI: 10.2217/pgs.15.74] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
AIM SNPs may be associated with (side) effects of chemotherapy and may be useful as biomarkers to predict febrile neutropenia. PATIENTS & METHODS 187 DNA samples extracted from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue from patients with stage II/III HER2-negative breast cancer were genotyped. RESULTS Candidate SNPs were selected and explored for association with febrile neutropenia and/or pathological complete response. TT genotype of 388 C>T in FGFR4 (rs351855) had a tendency toward higher incidence of febrile neutropenia during neoadjuvant chemotherapy, compared with the CT (p = 0.383) genotype and compared with the CC genotype (p = 0.068). CONCLUSION The TT genotype of 388 C>T FGFR4 may be related to incidence of febrile neutropenia during neoadjuvant TAC (docetaxel, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide) chemotherapy and is possibly useful as a patient-related risk factor when assessing febrile neutropenia risk. Original submitted 23 January 2015; Revision submitted 26 May 2015.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Charehbili
- Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, PO Box 9600, Albinusdreef 2, 2300 RC Leiden, The Netherlands.,Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - S de Groot
- Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, PO Box 9600, Albinusdreef 2, 2300 RC Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - T van der Straaten
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy & Toxicology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - J J Swen
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy & Toxicology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - H Pijl
- Department of Endocrinology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - H Gelderblom
- Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, PO Box 9600, Albinusdreef 2, 2300 RC Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - C J H van de Velde
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - J W R Nortier
- Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, PO Box 9600, Albinusdreef 2, 2300 RC Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - H J Guchelaar
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy & Toxicology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - J R Kroep
- Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, PO Box 9600, Albinusdreef 2, 2300 RC Leiden, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Fontein DBY, Klinten Grand M, Nortier JWR, Seynaeve C, Meershoek-Klein Kranenbarg E, Dirix LY, van de Velde CJH, Putter H. Dynamic prediction in breast cancer: proving feasibility in clinical practice using the TEAM trial. Ann Oncol 2015; 26:1254-1262. [PMID: 25862439 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdv146] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/16/2014] [Accepted: 03/05/2015] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Predictive models are an integral part of current clinical practice and help determine optimal treatment strategies for individual patients. A drawback is that covariates are assumed to have constant effects on overall survival (OS), when in fact, these effects may change during follow-up (FU). Furthermore, breast cancer (BC) patients may experience events that alter their prognosis from that time onwards. We investigated the 'dynamic' effects of different covariates on OS and developed a nomogram to calculate 5-year dynamic OS (DOS) probability at different prediction timepoints (tP) during FU. METHODS Dutch and Belgian postmenopausal, endocrine-sensitive, early BC patients enrolled in the TEAM trial were included. We assessed time-varying effects of specific covariates and obtained 5-year DOS predictions using a proportional baselines landmark supermodel. Covariates included age, histological grade, hormone receptor and HER2 status, T- and N-stage, locoregional recurrence (LRR), distant recurrence, and treatment compliance. A nomogram was designed to calculate 5-year DOS based on individual characteristics. RESULTS A total of 2602 patients were included (mean FU 6.2 years). N-stage, LRR, and HER2 status demonstrated time-varying effects on 5-year DOS. Hazard ratio (HR) functions for LRR, high-risk N-stage (N2/3), and HER2 positivity were HR = (8.427 × 0.583[Formula: see text], HR = (3.621 × 0.816[Formula: see text], and HR = (1.235 × 0.851[Formula: see text], respectively. Treatment discontinuation was associated with a higher mortality risk, but without a time-varying effect [HR 1.263 (0.867-1.841)]. All other covariates were time-constant. DISCUSSION The current nomogram accounts for elapsed time since starting adjuvant endocrine treatment and optimizes prediction of individual 5-year DOS during FU for postmenopausal, endocrine-sensitive BC patients. The nomogram can facilitate in determining whether further therapy will benefit an individual patient, although validation in an independent dataset is still needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - J W R Nortier
- Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden
| | - C Seynaeve
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - L Y Dirix
- Department of Medical Oncology, Academisch Ziekenhuis Sint-Augustinus Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | | | - H Putter
- Department of Medical Statistics.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Kool M, Fontein DBY, Meershoek-Klein Kranenbarg E, Nortier JWR, Rutgers EJT, Marang-van de Mheen PJ, van de Velde CJH. Long term effects of extended adjuvant endocrine therapy on quality of life in breast cancer patients. Breast 2015; 24:224-9. [PMID: 25704982 DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2015.01.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/17/2014] [Revised: 12/10/2014] [Accepted: 01/28/2015] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The standard treatment for hormone-receptor positive, postmenopausal early breast cancer patients is 5 years of adjuvant endocrine therapy. Previous studies demonstrate that prolonging adjuvant endocrine therapy may improve disease-free survival. However, endocrine therapy is known for its adverse events, which may negatively affect Quality of Life (QoL). The aim of this study is to assess the impact of extended adjuvant endocrine therapy on long-term QoL outcomes. METHODS 471 patients selected from the IDEAL trial were invited to complete a questionnaire 1-1.5 years after starting with extended therapy. The questionnaire consisted of the EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-BR23 questionnaires. Mean QoL outcomes were compared with EORTC reference values for stage I and II breast cancer patients and the general population. Furthermore, QoL outcomes were compared between different treatment regimens. A difference of eight points was considered clinically relevant. RESULTS IDEAL patients receiving extended adjuvant endocrine therapy have significantly and clinically relevant better global QoL compared with reference values for stage I and II breast cancer patients (79.6 versus 64.6; p < 0.01) and the general population (79.6 versus 71.2; p < 0.01). Similar results were found for emotional function, pain, appetite loss, diarrhea and financial problems. Between treatment regimens prior to extended adjuvant endocrine therapy, differences were only found on specific QoL domains (e.g. arm symptoms). CONCLUSION Breast cancer patients on extended adjuvant endocrine therapy have significantly and clinically relevant better global QoL compared with other stage I-II breast cancer patients and the general population, 6-8.5 years after diagnosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Kool
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands; Department of Medical Decision Making, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - D B Y Fontein
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | | | - J W R Nortier
- Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - E J T Rutgers
- Department of Surgery, Netherlands Cancer Institution, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - P J Marang-van de Mheen
- Department of Medical Decision Making, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - C J H van de Velde
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Dekker TJA, Charehbili A, Smit VTHBM, ten Dijke P, Kranenbarg EMK, van de Velde CJH, Nortier JWR, Tollenaar RAEM, Mesker WE, Kroep JR. Disorganised stroma determined on pre-treatment breast cancer biopsies is associated with poor response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy: Results from the NEOZOTAC trial. Mol Oncol 2015; 9:1120-8. [PMID: 25735561 DOI: 10.1016/j.molonc.2015.02.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2014] [Revised: 01/18/2015] [Accepted: 02/05/2015] [Indexed: 10/24/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The tumor-associated stroma is of importance for tumor progression and is generally accepted to have a significant influence on patient prognosis. However, little is known regarding specific features of tumor-associated stromal tissues and response to (neoadjuvant) chemotherapy. This study investigated the predictive value of extracellular matrix organization on response to chemotherapy in patients treated in the NEOZOTAC trial. METHODS Stromal organisation was analyzed via a simple method using image analysis software on hematoxylin and eosin (H&E)-stained slides from primary tumor biopsies collected as part of the NEOZOTAC trial. Heidenhain's AZAN trichrome-stained slides were also analyzed for comparison of collagen evaluation. Sections were stained for phospho-Smad2 (pS2) in order to determine the relationship of TGF-β signaling with stromal organization. RESULTS A statistically significant relationship was observed between stroma consisting of organised collagen and pathological response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (Odds Ratio 0.276, 95%CI 0.124-0.614, P = 0.002). This parameter was also related to ER-status (P = 0.003), clinical tumor -status (P = 0.041), nodal status (P = 0.029) and pS2 status (P = 0.025). Correlation between stromal organisation determined on H&E-stained and AZAN-stained tissue sections was high (Pearson's correlation coefficient = 0.806). CONCLUSION Intratumoral stromal organisation determined using pre-treatment breast cancer biopsies was related to pathological response to chemotherapy. This parameter might play a role in the management of breast cancer for identifying those patients that are likely to benefit from neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T J A Dekker
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, The Netherlands; Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, The Netherlands
| | - A Charehbili
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, The Netherlands; Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, The Netherlands
| | - V T H B M Smit
- Department of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Center, The Netherlands
| | - P ten Dijke
- Department of Molecular Cell Biology and Cancer Genomics Centre Netherlands, Leiden University Medical Center, The Netherlands; Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research, Uppsala, Sweden
| | | | - C J H van de Velde
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, The Netherlands
| | - J W R Nortier
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, The Netherlands
| | - R A E M Tollenaar
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, The Netherlands
| | - W E Mesker
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, The Netherlands
| | - J R Kroep
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
van der Geest LGM, Portielje JEA, Wouters MWJM, Weijl NI, Tanis BC, Tollenaar RAEM, Struikmans H, Nortier JWR. Complicated postoperative recovery increases omission, delay and discontinuation of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with Stage III colon cancer. Colorectal Dis 2014; 15:e582-91. [PMID: 23679338 DOI: 10.1111/codi.12288] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2012] [Accepted: 02/15/2013] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
AIM The study included investigation of factors determining suboptimal adjuvant chemotherapy of patients diagnosed with Stage III colon cancer. METHOD All 606 patients diagnosed with Stage III colon cancer between 2006 and 2008 in the western part of the Netherlands were included. Patient [gender, age, comorbidity and socio-economic status (SES)], tumour (location, stage and grade) and treatment (emergency surgery, laparoscopic surgery, reoperation, hospital stay and multidisciplinary meeting) factors were examined in logistic regression analyses predicting a complicated postoperative period and omission, delay and discontinuation of adjuvant chemotherapy. RESULTS Overall, 27% of all patients experienced a complicated postoperative period, which was independently associated with emergency surgery, older age, multiple comorbidity, male gender and poor tumour grade. Of patients who survived this period, 60% received chemotherapy. Chemotherapy was omitted more often in women, the elderly and in patients with Stage IIIB, reoperation, prolonged hospital stay and (borderline) after open surgery. Of patients who received chemotherapy, 86% started within 8 weeks after surgery. Patients with a higher SES, reoperation and prolonged hospital stay had a higher probability of a delayed start. Sixty-seven per cent of patients completed their chemotherapy. For women, elderly patients and patients with prolonged hospital stay a higher probability of discontinuation was noted. CONCLUSION Age was the most important predictive factor for receiving adjuvant chemotherapy. However, at all ages, complicated postoperative recovery negatively influenced the administration of chemotherapy to Stage III colon cancer patients, as well as a timely start and completion of chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L G M van der Geest
- Comprehensive Cancer Centre The Netherlands (CCCNL), Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Charehbili A, Wasser MN, Smit VTHBM, Putter H, van Leeuwen-Stok AE, Meershoek-Klein Kranenbarg WM, Liefers GJ, van de Velde CJH, Nortier JWR, Kroep JR. Accuracy of MRI for treatment response assessment after taxane- and anthracycline-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy in HER2-negative breast cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 2014; 40:1216-21. [PMID: 25150151 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2014.07.036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2014] [Revised: 06/23/2014] [Accepted: 07/14/2014] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Studies suggest that MRI is an accurate means for assessing tumor size after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). However, accuracy might be dependent on the receptor status of tumors. MRI accuracy for response assessment after homogenous NAC in a relative large group of patients with stage II/III HER2-negative breast cancer has not been reported before. METHODS 250 patients from 26 hospitals received NAC (docetaxel, adriamycin and cyclophosphamide) in the context of the NEOZOTAC trial. MRI was done after 3 cycles and post-NAC. Imaging (RECIST 1.1) and pathological (Miller and Payne) responses were recorded. Accuracy measures were calculated and MRI and pathologically assessed tumor sizes were correlated. Tumor size over- and underestimation were quantified. RESULTS Accuracy of MRI for determining pathological complete response (pCR) was 76%. The ROC-curve of MRI response and pCR had an area under the curve value of 0.63 (95% C.I. 0.52-0.74). The correlation coefficient of MRI and histopathological tumor measurements was 0.46 (p < 0.001). Correlations were different for ER-positive (r = 0.40, p < 0.001) and ER-negative (r = 0.76, p < 0.001) breast tumors. MRI under- and overestimated the tumor size in 47% and 40% of all patients. In cases of substantial tumor size underestimation (>2 cm), surgical margins were more often tumor positive compared to the rest of the patients (33% vs.12%, p = 0.005). CONCLUSION MRI measurements correlated moderately with tumor size on the surgical specimen. Only in ER-negative breast tumors, MRI tumor sizes correlated sufficiently with residual tumor size on the pathological specimen. Therefore, post-NAC MRI should be interpreted with caution.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Charehbili
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, The Netherlands; Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, The Netherlands.
| | - M N Wasser
- Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, The Netherlands
| | - V T H B M Smit
- Department of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Center, The Netherlands
| | - H Putter
- Department of Medical Statistics, Leiden University Medical Center, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - G J Liefers
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, The Netherlands
| | - C J H van de Velde
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, The Netherlands
| | - J W R Nortier
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, The Netherlands
| | - J R Kroep
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
van Iersel LBJ, de Leede EM, Vahrmeijer AL, Tijl FGJ, den Hartigh J, Kuppen PJK, Hartgrink HH, Gelderblom H, Nortier JWR, Tollenaar RAEM, van de Velde CJH. Isolated hepatic perfusion with oxaliplatin combined with 100 mg melphalan in patients with metastases confined to the liver: A phase I study. Eur J Surg Oncol 2014; 40:1557-63. [PMID: 25125340 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2014.06.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2014] [Revised: 06/18/2014] [Accepted: 06/26/2014] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
AIM To improve isolated hepatic perfusion (IHP), we performed a phase I dose-escalation study to determine the optimal oxaliplatin dose in combination with a fixed melphalan dose. METHODS Between June 2007 and July 2008, 11 patients, comprising of 8 colorectal cancer and 3 uveal melanoma patients and all with isolated liver metastases, were treated with a one hour IHP with escalating doses of oxaliplatin combined with 100 mg melphalan. Samples of blood and perfusate were taken during IHP treatment for pharmacokinetic analysis of both drugs and patients were monitored for toxicity, response and survival. RESULTS Dose limiting sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (SOS) occurred at 150 mg oxaliplatin. The areas under the concentration-time curves (AUC) of oxaliplatin at the maximal tolerated dose (MTD) of 100 mg oxaliplatin ranged from 11.9 mg/L h to 16.5 mg/L h. All 4 patients treated at the MTD showed progressive disease 3 months after IHP. CONCLUSIONS In view of similar and even higher doses of oxaliplatin applied in both systemic treatment and hepatic artery infusion (HAI), applying this dose in IHP is not expected to improve treatment results in patients with isolated hepatic metastases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L B J van Iersel
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - E M de Leede
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - A L Vahrmeijer
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - F G J Tijl
- Department of Extra Corporal Circulation, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - J den Hartigh
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Toxicology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - P J K Kuppen
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - H H Hartgrink
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - H Gelderblom
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - J W R Nortier
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - R A E M Tollenaar
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - C J H van de Velde
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Smorenburg CH, de Groot SM, van Leeuwen-Stok AE, Hamaker ME, Wymenga AN, de Graaf H, de Jongh FE, Braun JJ, Los M, Maartense E, van Tinteren H, Nortier JWR, Seynaeve C. A randomized phase III study comparing pegylated liposomal doxorubicin with capecitabine as first-line chemotherapy in elderly patients with metastatic breast cancer: results of the OMEGA study of the Dutch Breast Cancer Research Group BOOG. Ann Oncol 2014; 25:599-605. [PMID: 24504445 PMCID: PMC4433520 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdt588] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2013] [Revised: 12/01/2013] [Accepted: 12/02/2013] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Prospective data on chemotherapy for elderly patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) remain scarce. We compared the efficacy and safety of first-line chemotherapy with pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) versus capecitabine in MBC patients aged ≥65 years in a multicentre, phase III trial. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients were randomized to six cycles of PLD (45 mg/m(2) every 4 weeks) or eight cycles of capecitabine (1000 mg/m(2) twice daily, day 1-14 every 3 weeks). RESULTS The study enrolled 78 of the planned 154 patients and was closed prematurely due to slow accrual and supply problems of PLD. Many included patients were aged ≥75 years (54%) and vulnerable (≥1 geriatric condition: 71%). The median dose intensity was 85% for PLD and 84% for capecitabine, respectively. In both arms, the majority of patients completed at least 12 weeks of treatment (PLD 73%; capecitabine 74%). After a median follow-up of 39 months, 77 patients had progressed and 62 patients had died of MBC. Median progression-free survival was 5.6 versus 7.7 months (P = 0.11) for PLD and capecitabine, respectively. Median overall survival was 13.8 months for PLD and 16.8 months for capecitabine (P = 0.59). Both treatments were feasible, grade 3 toxicities consisting of fatigue (both arms: 13%), hand-foot syndrome (PLD: 10%; capecitabine: 16%), stomatitis (PLD: 10%; capecitabine: 3%), exanthema (PLD: 5%) and diarrhoea (PLD: 3%; capecitabine: 5%). Only 1 of 10 patients aged ≥80 years completed chemotherapy, while 3 and 6 patients discontinued treatment due to toxicity or progressive disease, respectively. CONCLUSION Both PLD and capecitabine demonstrated comparable efficacy and acceptable tolerance as first-line single-agent chemotherapy in elderly patients with MBC, even in vulnerable patients or patients aged ≥75 years. However, patients aged ≥80 years were unlikely to complete chemotherapy successfully. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBERS EudraCT 2006-002046-10; ISRCTN 11114726; CKTO 2006-09; BOOG 2006-02.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C H Smorenburg
- Department of Internal Medicine, Medical Center Alkmaar, Alkmaar.
| | - S M de Groot
- Comprehensive Cancer Center the Netherlands, Amsterdam
| | | | - M E Hamaker
- Department of Geriatric Medicine, Diakonessenhuis, Utrecht
| | - A N Wymenga
- Department of Internal Medicine, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede
| | - H de Graaf
- Department of Internal Medicine, Medical Center Leeuwarden, Leeuwarden
| | - F E de Jongh
- Department of Internal Medicine, Ikazia Hospital, Rotterdam
| | - J J Braun
- Department of Internal Medicine, Vlietland Hospital, Schiedam
| | - M Los
- Department of Internal Medicine, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein
| | - E Maartense
- Department of Internal Medicine, Reinier de Graaf Hospital, Delft
| | - H van Tinteren
- Biometrics Department, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam
| | - J W R Nortier
- Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden
| | - C Seynaeve
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus Medical Center-Daniel den Hoed Cancer Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Charehbili A, van de Ven S, Smit VTHBM, Meershoek-Klein Kranenbarg E, Hamdy NAT, Putter H, Heijns JB, van Warmerdam LJC, Kessels L, Dercksen M, Pepels MJ, Maartense E, van Laarhoven HWM, Vriens B, Wasser MN, van Leeuwen-Stok AE, Liefers GJ, van de Velde CJH, Nortier JWR, Kroep JR. Addition of zoledronic acid to neoadjuvant chemotherapy does not enhance tumor response in patients with HER2-negative stage II/III breast cancer: the NEOZOTAC trial (BOOG 2010-01). Ann Oncol 2014; 25:998-1004. [PMID: 24585721 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdu102] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/02/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The role of zoledronic acid (ZA) when added to the neoadjuvant treatment of breast cancer (BC) in enhancing the clinical and pathological response of tumors is unclear. The effect of ZA on the antitumor effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy has not prospectively been studied before. PATIENTS AND METHODS NEOZOTAC is a national, multicenter, randomized study comparing the efficacy of TAC (docetaxel, adriamycin and cyclophosphamide i.v.) followed by granulocyte colony-stimulating factor on day 2 with or without ZA 4 mg i.v. q 3 weeks inpatients withstage II/III, HER2-negative BC. We present data on the pathological complete response (pCR in breast and axilla), on clinical response using MRI, and toxicity. Post hoc subgroup analyses were undertaken to address the predictive value of menopausal status. RESULTS Addition of ZA to chemotherapy did not improve pCR rates (13.2% for TAC+ZA versus 13.3% for TAC). Postmenopausal women (N = 96) had a numerical benefit from ZA treatment (pCR 14.0% for TAC+ZA versus 8.7% for TAC, P = 0.42). Clinical objective response did not differ between treatment arms (72.9% versus 73.7%). There was no difference in grade III/IV toxicity between treatment arms. CONCLUSIONS Addition of ZA to neoadjuvant chemotherapy did not improve pathological or clinical response to chemotherapy. Further investigations are warranted in postmenopausal women with BC, since this subgroup might benefit from ZA treatment.
Collapse
|
19
|
Issa DE, Gelderblom H, Lugtenburg PJ, van Herk-Sukel MP, Houweling LMA, De La Orden M, van der Werf-Langenberg ME, Nortier JWR, de Jong FA. Healthcare utilisation in patients with breast cancer or non-Hodgkin lymphoma who experienced febrile neutropenia in the Netherlands: a retrospective matched control study using the PHARMO database. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 2014; 24:232-41. [PMID: 24528512 DOI: 10.1111/ecc.12189] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/07/2014] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Few data have been published on healthcare resource utilisation associated with chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia (FN) in Europe. Using the PHARMO record linkage system, we identified incident adult patients with a primary hospital discharge diagnosis of breast cancer (BC) or non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) from 1998 to 2008. Patients who experienced FN were matched 1:2 non-FN reference patients. Of 1033 BC patients, 80 (8%) had FN and were matched with 160 reference patients; and of 486 NHL patients, 95 (20%) had FN and 89 were matched with 178 reference patients. Significantly more FN patients were hospitalised for any cause than reference patients: BC, 81% vs. 24% (OR 12.6; 95% CI 5.7-27.8); NHL, 82% vs. 44% (OR 6.7; 95% CI 3.3-13.9). Median length of all-cause hospitalisation stay was higher for FN patients: BC, 4.0 vs. 1.0 days; NHL, 8.5 vs. 1.8 days. The median (interquartile range) number of medication treatments was higher for FN patients: BC, 5.5 (4.0-7.5) vs. 2.0 (2.0-4.0); NHL, 8.0 (5.0-11.0) vs. 3.0 (2.0-4.0). In conclusion, FN in patients with BC or NHL had increased healthcare utilisation compared with non-FN patients; thus, efforts to reduce FN are warranted to reduce cost and improve outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D E Issa
- Department of Haematology, VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Hamaker ME, Seynaeve C, Wymenga ANM, van Tinteren H, Nortier JWR, Maartense E, de Graaf H, de Jongh FE, Braun JJ, Los M, Schrama JG, van Leeuwen-Stok AE, de Groot SM, Smorenburg CH. Baseline comprehensive geriatric assessment is associated with toxicity and survival in elderly metastatic breast cancer patients receiving single-agent chemotherapy: results from the OMEGA study of the Dutch breast cancer trialists' group. Breast 2013; 23:81-7. [PMID: 24314824 DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2013.11.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 86] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2013] [Revised: 10/15/2013] [Accepted: 11/15/2013] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
AIM To evaluate the association between baseline comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) or the Groningen Frailty Indicator (GFI) and toxicity in elderly metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients treated with first-line palliative chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS MBC patients (≥65 years) were randomized between pegylated liposomal doxorubicine or capecitabine. CGA included instrumental activities of daily living (IADL), cognition using the mini-mental state examination (MMSE), mood using the geriatric depression scale (GDS), comorbidity using the Charlson index, polypharmacy and nutritional status using the body mass index. Frailty on CGA was defined as one or more of the following: IADL ≤ 13, MMSE ≤ 23, GDS ≥ 5, BMI ≤ 20, ≥5 medications or Charlson ≥2. The cut-off for frailty on the GFI was ≥4. RESULTS Of the randomized 78 patients (median age 75.5 years, range 65.8-86.8 years), 73 were evaluable for CGA; 52 (71%) had one or more geriatric conditions. Grade 3-4 chemotherapy-related toxicity was experienced by 19% of patients without geriatric conditions compared to 56% of patients with two geriatric conditions and 80% of those with three or more (p = 0.002). Polypharmacy was the only individual factor significantly associated with toxicity (p = 0.001). GFI had a sensitivity of 69% and a specificity of 76% for frailty on CGA, and was not significantly associated with survival or toxicity. CONCLUSION In this study of elderly patients with MBC, the number of geriatric conditions correlated with grade 3-4 chemotherapy-related toxicity. Therefore, in elderly patients for whom chemotherapy is being considered, a CGA could be a useful addition to the decision-making process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M E Hamaker
- Department of Geriatric Medicine, Diakonessenhuis Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| | - C Seynaeve
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus University Medical Centre - Daniel den Hoed Cancer Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - A N M Wymenga
- Department of Internal Medicine, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - H van Tinteren
- Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital/NKI, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - J W R Nortier
- Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - E Maartense
- Department of Internal Medicine, Reinier de Graaf Hospital, Delft, The Netherlands
| | - H de Graaf
- Department of Medical Oncology, Medical Center Leeuwarden, Leeuwarden, The Netherlands
| | - F E de Jongh
- Department of Internal Medicine, Ikazia Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - J J Braun
- Department of Internal Medicine, Vlietland Hospital, Schiedam, The Netherlands
| | - M Los
- Department of Internal Medicine, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| | - J G Schrama
- Department of Internal Medicine, Spaarne Hospital, Hoofddorp, The Netherlands
| | | | - S M de Groot
- Dutch Breast Cancer Trialists' Group BOOG/Comprehensive Cancer Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - C H Smorenburg
- Department of Internal Medicine, Medical Centre Alkmaar, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
van den Hurk CJG, van den Akker-van Marle ME, Breed WPM, van de Poll-Franse LV, Nortier JWR, Coebergh JWW. Impact of scalp cooling on chemotherapy-induced alopecia, wig use and hair growth of patients with cancer. Eur J Oncol Nurs 2013; 17:536-40. [PMID: 23571182 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejon.2013.02.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2012] [Revised: 02/18/2013] [Accepted: 02/25/2013] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Cytotoxic therapy for patients with cancer frequently induces reversible, but long-lasting alopecia which might be prevented by scalp cooling. This study evaluates the effectiveness of scalp cooling with respect to the severity of chemotherapy-induced alopecia (CIA) and the purchase and use of wigs and head covers. MATERIALS AND METHODS In this observational study, scalp-cooled patients (n = 160) were compared with non scalp-cooled patients (n = 86) with several types of cancer. Patients were enrolled in 15, mostly general hospitals prior to taxane and/or anthracycline-based chemotherapy. Patients completed four questionnaires between the start and one year after the last chemotherapy. RESULTS Severity of CIA, and purchasing and actually wearing wigs and head covers were significantly lower among scalp-cooled than non scalp-cooled patients. Overall, scalp cooling reduced the use of wigs and head covers by 40%. Among 84 scalp-cooled patients who purchased a wig (53%), only 52 patients actually wore it (62%), and they just wore it intensively (86% daily) for less than six months (80%). Especially young patients camouflaged CIA with a head cover instead of a wig. DISCUSSION The relatively long duration of CIA, the wish of many patients to camouflage or rather prevent it and the 40% reduction for head covering by scalp cooling, makes it a worthwhile supportive intervention. However, (cost-) effectiveness can be improved. Many scalp-cooled patients purchased a wig unnecessarily.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C J G van den Hurk
- Research Department, Comprehensive Cancer Centre South, PO Box 231, 5600 AE Eindhoven, The Netherlands; Department of Clinical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Centre, PO Box 9600, 2300 RC Leiden, The Netherlands.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
van de Ven S, Liefers GJ, Putter H, van Warmerdam LJ, Kessels LW, Dercksen W, Pepels MJ, Maartense E, van Laarhoven HWM, Vriens B, Smit VTHBM, Wasser MNJM, Meershoek-Klein KEM, van Leeuwen-Stok E, van de Velde CJH, Nortier JWR, Kroep JR. Abstract PD07-06: NEO-ZOTAC: Toxicity data of a phase III randomized trial with NEOadjuvant chemotherapy (TAC) with or without ZOledronic acid (ZA) for patients with HER2-negative large resectable or locally advanced breast cancer (BC). Cancer Res 2012. [DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.sabcs12-pd07-06] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: The role of bisphosphonates (BP) when added to the (neo)adjuvant treatment of BC in enhancing the efficacy of therapy is still unknown. NEOZOTAC investigates the efficacy of ZA added to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with HER2-negative BC.
Trial design: NEOZOTAC is a Dutch multicenter study. Patients are 1:1 randomized to 3-weekly TAC (docetaxel 75mg/m2, adriamycin 50 mg/m2 and cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m2 i.v., day 1) chemotherapy supported by pegfilgrastim (6 mg sc), day 2 with or without ZA (4 mg i.v. within 24 hr after chemotherapy) q3 weeks.
Eligibility criteria: Main inclusion criteria: stage II or III, measurable, HER2-negative BC, age ≥18 years, WHO 0–2, adequate bone marrow-, renal-, and liver function, absence of prior BP usage and absence of active dental problems.
Study endpoint: The primary endpoint is the pathologic complete response (pCR) rate. Secondary endpoints are toxicity, clinical response, tumor heterogeneity in core biopsy vs. operation specimen, and (disease free) survival. Optional side studies include fluorescent imaging (SoftScan®), changes in bone markers, single nucleotide polymorphisms and the insulin-like growth factor pathway, circulating tumor and endothelial cells and the false-negative rate of the sentinel node biopsy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
Statistical Methods: Using a 5% significance level based on the two-sided Fishers exact test with a power of 80%, 250 patients (125/arm) are needed to show an improvement of the pCR-rate from 17% to 34% in the experimental arm. Randomization was done according to the Pococks minimisation technique stratified by cT, cN, and estrogen receptor status. Toxicity is analyzed using the Exact (2-sided) Chi-Square test.
Results: From July 2010 to April 2012, 250 patients from 25 participating sites were randomized. Toxicity data of 173 patients are currently available and data of all 250 patients will be presented at SABCS. Patient characteristics are presented in table 1.
Hematological and non-hematological toxicities were not significantly different between both treatment arms. Main grade 3/4 NCI-CTCv4 toxicities were neutropenia (8%), followed by febrile neutropenia (7%), fatigue (6%), diarrhea, hypertension, nausea (3%) and vomiting (1.2%). Bone pain, myalgia, and hypocalcemia occurred in one patient in the TAC-ZA arm (0.6%). Osteonecrosis of the jaw was not observed.
Conclusions: Neoadjuvant TAC supported by pegfilgrastim plus ZA is feasible. No significant difference in toxicity are reported compared with the control arm.
Citation Information: Cancer Res 2012;72(24 Suppl):Abstract nr PD07-06.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S van de Ven
- Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC), Leiden, Netherlands; Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, Netherlands; Deventer Hospital, Deventer, Netherlands
| | - G-j Liefers
- Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC), Leiden, Netherlands; Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, Netherlands; Deventer Hospital, Deventer, Netherlands
| | - H Putter
- Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC), Leiden, Netherlands; Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, Netherlands; Deventer Hospital, Deventer, Netherlands
| | - LJ van Warmerdam
- Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC), Leiden, Netherlands; Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, Netherlands; Deventer Hospital, Deventer, Netherlands
| | - LW Kessels
- Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC), Leiden, Netherlands; Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, Netherlands; Deventer Hospital, Deventer, Netherlands
| | - W Dercksen
- Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC), Leiden, Netherlands; Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, Netherlands; Deventer Hospital, Deventer, Netherlands
| | - MJ Pepels
- Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC), Leiden, Netherlands; Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, Netherlands; Deventer Hospital, Deventer, Netherlands
| | - E Maartense
- Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC), Leiden, Netherlands; Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, Netherlands; Deventer Hospital, Deventer, Netherlands
| | - HWM van Laarhoven
- Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC), Leiden, Netherlands; Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, Netherlands; Deventer Hospital, Deventer, Netherlands
| | - B Vriens
- Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC), Leiden, Netherlands; Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, Netherlands; Deventer Hospital, Deventer, Netherlands
| | - VTHBM Smit
- Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC), Leiden, Netherlands; Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, Netherlands; Deventer Hospital, Deventer, Netherlands
| | - MNJM Wasser
- Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC), Leiden, Netherlands; Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, Netherlands; Deventer Hospital, Deventer, Netherlands
| | - Kranenbarg EM Meershoek-Klein
- Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC), Leiden, Netherlands; Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, Netherlands; Deventer Hospital, Deventer, Netherlands
| | - E van Leeuwen-Stok
- Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC), Leiden, Netherlands; Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, Netherlands; Deventer Hospital, Deventer, Netherlands
| | - CJH van de Velde
- Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC), Leiden, Netherlands; Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, Netherlands; Deventer Hospital, Deventer, Netherlands
| | - JWR Nortier
- Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC), Leiden, Netherlands; Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, Netherlands; Deventer Hospital, Deventer, Netherlands
| | - JR Kroep
- Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC), Leiden, Netherlands; Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, Netherlands; Deventer Hospital, Deventer, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Fontein DBY, Houtsma D, Hille ETM, Seynaeve C, Putter H, Meershoek-Klein Kranenbarg E, Guchelaar HJ, Gelderblom H, Dirix LY, Paridaens R, Bartlett JMS, Nortier JWR, van de Velde CJH. Relationship between specific adverse events and efficacy of exemestane therapy in early postmenopausal breast cancer patients. Ann Oncol 2012; 23:3091-3097. [PMID: 22865782 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mds204] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Many adverse events (AEs) associated with aromatase inhibitors (AIs) involve symptoms related to the depletion of circulating estrogens, and may be related to efficacy. We assessed the relationship between specific AEs [hot flashes (HF) and musculoskeletal AEs (MSAE)] and survival outcomes in Dutch and Belgian patients treated with exemestane (EXE) in the Tamoxifen Exemestane Adjuvant Multinational (TEAM) trial. Additionally, the relationship between hormone receptor expression and AEs was assessed. METHODS Efficacy end points were relapse-free survival (RFS), overall survival (OS) and breast cancer-specific mortality (BCSM), starting at 6 months after starting EXE treatment. AEs reported in the first 6 months of treatment were included. Specific AEs comprised HF and/or MSAE. Landmark analyses and Cox proportional hazards models assessed survival differences up to 5 years. RESULTS A total of 1485 EXE patients were included. Patients with HF had a better RFS than patients without HF [multivariate hazard ratio (HR) 0.393, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.19-0.813; P = 0.012]. The occurrence of MSAE versus no MSAE did not relate to better RFS (multivariate HR 0.677, 95% CI 0.392-1.169; P = 0.162). Trends were maintained for OS and BCSM. Quantitative hormone receptor expression was not associated with specific AEs. CONCLUSIONS Some AEs associated with estrogen depletion are related to better outcomes and may be valuable biomarkers in AI treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D B Y Fontein
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden
| | - D Houtsma
- Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden
| | - E T M Hille
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden
| | - C Seynaeve
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC-Daniel den Hoed Cancer Center, Rotterdam
| | - H Putter
- Department of Medical Statistics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden
| | | | - H J Guchelaar
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy & Toxicology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - H Gelderblom
- Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden
| | | | | | - J M S Bartlett
- Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Canada; Department of Pathology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - J W R Nortier
- Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden
| | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
van Steenbergen LN, Lemmens VEPP, Rutten HJT, Wymenga ANM, Nortier JWR, Janssen-Heijnen MLG. Increased adjuvant treatment and improved survival in elderly stage III colon cancer patients in The Netherlands. Ann Oncol 2012; 23:2805-2811. [PMID: 22562836 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mds102] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND We determined to what extent patients with colon cancer stage III ≥ 75 years received adjuvant chemotherapy and the impact on overall and disease-specific survival. PATIENTS AND METHODS Data from The Netherlands Cancer Registry on all 8051 patients with colon cancer stage III ≥ 75 years diagnosed in 1997-2009 were included. Trends in adjuvant chemotherapy administration were analysed and multivariable overall and disease-specific survival analyses were performed. RESULTS The proportion of stage III colon cancer patients ≥ 75 years who received adjuvant chemotherapy increased from 12%in 1997-2000 to 23% in 2007-2009 (P < 0.0001), with a marked age gradient and large geographic variation. Five-year overall survival increased over time from 28% in 1997-2000 to 35% in 2004-2006 (P < 0.0001). Sixty percent of patients died of colorectal cancer. Adjuvant chemotherapy was the strongest positive predictor of survival in this retrospective study (hazard ratio = 0.5; 95% confidence interval: 0.4-0.5). CONCLUSION There has been an increase in administration of adjuvant chemotherapy to elderly patients with stage III colon cancer in The Netherlands since 1997. Survival of elderly patients with stage III colon cancer increased over time, at least partly due to stage migration. The large effect of adjuvant chemotherapy on survival in this study is likely to be associated with the selection of fitter patients for adjuvant treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - V E P P Lemmens
- Eindhoven Cancer Registry, Comprehensive Cancer Centre South, Eindhoven; Department of Public Health, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam
| | - H J T Rutten
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven
| | - A N M Wymenga
- Department of Internal Medicine, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede
| | | | - M L G Janssen-Heijnen
- Eindhoven Cancer Registry, Comprehensive Cancer Centre South, Eindhoven; Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Viecuri Medical Centre, Venlo, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Vestjens JHMJ, Pepels MJ, de Boer M, Borm GF, van Deurzen CHM, van Diest PJ, van Dijck JAAM, Adang EMM, Nortier JWR, Rutgers EJT, Seynaeve C, Menke-Pluymers MBE, Bult P, Tjan-Heijnen VCG. Relevant impact of central pathology review on nodal classification in individual breast cancer patients. Ann Oncol 2012; 23:2561-2566. [PMID: 22495317 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mds072] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In the MIRROR study, pN0(i + ) and pN1mi were associated with reduced 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) compared with pN0. Nodal status (N-status) was assessed after central pathology review and restaging according to the sixth AJCC classification. We addressed the impact of pathology review. PATIENTS AND METHODS Early favorable primary breast cancer patients, classified pN0, pN0(i + ), or pN1(mi) by local pathologists after sentinel node procedure, were included. We assessed the impact of pathology review on N-status (n = 2842) and 5-year DFS for those without adjuvant therapy (n = 1712). RESULTS In all, 22% of the 1082 original pN0 patients was upstaged. Of the 623 original pN0(i + ) patients, 1% was downstaged, 26% was upstaged. Of 1137 patients staged pN1mi, 15% was downstaged, 11% upstaged. Originally, 5-year DFS was 85% for pN0, 74% for pN0(i + ), and 73% for pN1mi; HR 1.70 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.27-2.27] and HR 1.57 (95% CI 1.16-2.13), respectively, compared with pN0. By review staging, 5-year DFS was 86% for pN0, 77% for pN0(i + ), 77% for pN1mi, and 74% for pN1 + . CONCLUSION Pathology review changed the N-classification in 24%, mainly upstaging, with potentially clinical relevance for individual patients. The association of isolated tumor cells and micrometastases with outcome remained unchanged. Quality control should include nodal breast cancer staging.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J H M J Vestjens
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, GROW-School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht
| | - M J Pepels
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, GROW-School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht
| | - M de Boer
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, GROW-School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht
| | - G F Borm
- Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and HTA, Radboud University Medical Centre Nijmegen, Nijmegen
| | | | - P J van Diest
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht
| | - J A A M van Dijck
- Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and HTA, Radboud University Medical Centre Nijmegen, Nijmegen
| | - E M M Adang
- Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and HTA, Radboud University Medical Centre Nijmegen, Nijmegen
| | - J W R Nortier
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden
| | - E J Th Rutgers
- Department of Surgery, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam
| | - C Seynaeve
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology
| | - M B E Menke-Pluymers
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus Medical Centre-Daniel den Hoed Cancer Centre, Rotterdam
| | - P Bult
- Department of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Centre Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - V C G Tjan-Heijnen
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, GROW-School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht.
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
van Nes JGH, Fontein DBY, Hille ETM, Voskuil DW, van Leeuwen FE, de Haes JCJM, Putter H, Seynaeve C, Nortier JWR, van de Velde CJH. Quality of life in relation to tamoxifen or exemestane treatment in postmenopausal breast cancer patients: a Tamoxifen Exemestane Adjuvant Multinational (TEAM) Trial side study. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2012; 134:267-76. [PMID: 22453754 PMCID: PMC3397233 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-012-2028-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2012] [Accepted: 03/08/2012] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
Tamoxifen and aromatase inhibitors are associated with side effects which can significantly impact quality of life (QoL). We assessed QoL in the Tamoxifen Exemestane Adjuvant Multinational (TEAM) Trial and compared these data with reported adverse events in the main database. 2,754 Dutch postmenopausal early breast cancer patients were randomized between 5 years of exemestane, or tamoxifen (2.5–3 years) followed by exemestane (2.5–2 years). 742 patients were invited to participate in the QoL side study and complete questionnaires at 1 (T1) and 2 (T2) years after start of endocrine treatment. Questionnaires comprised the EORTC QLQ-C30 and BR23 questionnaires, supplemented with FACT-ES questions. 543 patients completed questionnaires at T1 and 454 patients (84 %) at T2. Overall QoL and most functioning scales improved over time. The only clinically relevant and statistically significant difference between treatment types concerned insomnia; exemestane-treated patients reported more insomnia than tamoxifen-treated patients. Discrepancy was observed between QoL issue scores reported by the patients and adverse events reported by physicians. Certain QoL issues are treatment- and/or time-specific and deserve attention by health care providers. There is a need for careful inquiry into QoL issues by those prescribing endocrine treatment to optimize QoL and treatment adherence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J G H van Nes
- Department of Surgery, K6-R, Leiden University Medical Centre, P.O. Box 9600, 2300, RC, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Thyroid cancer is a heterogeneous disease that is classified into differentiated thyroid carcinoma (DTC), undifferentiated/anaplastic thyroid carcinoma (ATC) and medullary thyroid carcinoma. Results of conventional treatment modalities in advanced thyroid cancer have been disappointing and therefore, new therapies are needed. METHODS We searched PubMed, The Cochrane Library, Medline and EMBASE databases and abstracts published in annual proceedings for new treatment modalities in advanced thyroid cancer. We also searched for ongoing trials in www.clinicaltrials.gov. RESULTS Six phase I, 17 phase II and 1 phase III trials with tyrosine kinase inhibitors were carried out. We found 2 pilot studies and 11 phase II trials with redifferentiation therapies, mainly in DTC. For antiproliferative approaches, three phase I and four phase II trials were found. Immunomodulatory gene therapy was tested in a pilot study in ATC patients. Two phase II trials were carried out with immunotherapy. One phase I and nine phase II trials were found with radionucleotide therapy in patients with DTC. CONCLUSION The developments in the treatment of advanced thyroid cancer are intriguing. Future trials should aim at combinations of targeted agents with or without other treatment modalities, and will hopefully contribute to further improvement of outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - J W A Smit
- Endocrinology and Metabolic Diseases, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Lam SW, de Groot SM, Honkoop AH, Jager A, ten Tije AJ, Bos MMEM, Linn SC, van den BJ, Nortier JWR, Braun JJ, de Graaf H, Portielje JEA, Los M, Gooyer DD, van Tinteren H, Boven E. PD07-07: Combination of Paclitaxel and Bevacizumab without or with Capecitabine as First-Line Treatment of HER2−Negative Locally Recurrent or Metastatic Breast Cancer (LR/MBC): First Results from a Randomized, Multicenter, Open-Label, Phase II Study of the Dutch Breast Cancer Trialists' Group (BOOG). Cancer Res 2011. [DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.sabcs11-pd07-07] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: First-line treatment of HER2−negative LR/MBC with paclitaxel (T) and bevacizumab (A) has demonstrated improved progression-free survival (PFS) and overall response rate (ORR) when compared with T alone (E2100). We determined whether addition of capecitabine (X) to AT is safe and would be better effective than AT in women with HER2−negative LR/MBC.
Methods: Eligibility criteria were age ≥18 & ≤75 years, measurable or non-measurable HER2−negative LR/MBC, ECOG PS 0–1 and no prior chemotherapy for LR/MBC. Patients were randomized in 1:1 ratio to receive AT (4-week cycle of T 90 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, 15 and A 10 mg/kg on days 1, 15 for 6 cycles, followed by A 15 mg/kg on day 1 given 3-weekly for subsequent cycles) or ATX (3-week cycle of T 90 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, A 15 mg/kg on day 1 and X 825 mg/m2 bid on days 1–14 for 8 cycles, followed by A 15 mg/kg on day 1 and X 825 mg/m2 bid on days 1–14 given 3-weekly for subsequent cycles). Treatment was discontinued at disease progression, unmanageable toxicity or withdrawal of consent. The primary endpoint was PFS. Secondary endpoints were overall survival, ORR, duration of response and toxicity. Efficacy was evaluated according to RECIST 1.0 and toxicity was assessed according to NCI CTCAE 3.0.
Results: From June 2007 till December 2010, 312 patients were recruited at 36 sites. The median age was 56 years (range 32–76). Among all patients, 52% had ECOG 0, 85% were hormone-receptor positive, 86% had measurable disease and 8% had bone-only metastases. These factors were well balanced between both arms. A total of 48% and 33% of patients, respectively, received prior hormonal therapy or radiotherapy for LR/MBC. At the data cut-off of 1st June 2011, the median follow-up duration was 23 months. 311 patients received at least one cycle of treatment and were evaluable for safety. The median number of treatment cycles in AT was 9 and in ATX was 11 (both 33 weeks). An ORR of ≥40% was reached in patients with measurable disease in both groups. The incidence of serious adverse events (SAEs) was 47% and 40% for AT and ATX, respectively, while that of treatment-related SAEs was 12% and 19%, respectively. Treatment-related deaths were 2% for AT and 2% for ATX. The overall rate of AEs grade 3 or 4 was similar in both arms as shown in Table 1, except for hand-foot syndrome grade 3 and neutropenia grade 3 in ATX. In addition, 6 patients with pulmonary embolism were reported in ATX.
Conclusions: ATX was well tolerable, although more patients experienced hand-foot syndrome grade 3 and thromboembolic events than patients treated with AT. The efficacy data will be presented at the meeting. Support: This study was supported by Roche.
Citation Information: Cancer Res 2011;71(24 Suppl):Abstract nr PD07-07.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- SW Lam
- 1VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Comprehensive Cancer Centre the Netherlands, Netherlands; Isala Clinics, Zwolle, Netherlands; Erasmus Medical Center-Daniel den Hoed Cancer Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands; Tergooi Hospitals, Hilversum, Netherlands; Reinier de Graaf Hospital, Delft, Netherlands; The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Albert Schweitzer Hospital, Dordrecht, Netherlands; Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands; Vlietland Hospital, Schiedam, Netherlands; Medical Center Leeuwarden, Leeuwarden, Netherlands; Haga Hospital, The Hague, Netherlands; St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, Netherlands; Franciscus Hospital, Roosendaal, Netherlands
| | - SM de Groot
- 1VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Comprehensive Cancer Centre the Netherlands, Netherlands; Isala Clinics, Zwolle, Netherlands; Erasmus Medical Center-Daniel den Hoed Cancer Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands; Tergooi Hospitals, Hilversum, Netherlands; Reinier de Graaf Hospital, Delft, Netherlands; The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Albert Schweitzer Hospital, Dordrecht, Netherlands; Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands; Vlietland Hospital, Schiedam, Netherlands; Medical Center Leeuwarden, Leeuwarden, Netherlands; Haga Hospital, The Hague, Netherlands; St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, Netherlands; Franciscus Hospital, Roosendaal, Netherlands
| | - AH Honkoop
- 1VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Comprehensive Cancer Centre the Netherlands, Netherlands; Isala Clinics, Zwolle, Netherlands; Erasmus Medical Center-Daniel den Hoed Cancer Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands; Tergooi Hospitals, Hilversum, Netherlands; Reinier de Graaf Hospital, Delft, Netherlands; The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Albert Schweitzer Hospital, Dordrecht, Netherlands; Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands; Vlietland Hospital, Schiedam, Netherlands; Medical Center Leeuwarden, Leeuwarden, Netherlands; Haga Hospital, The Hague, Netherlands; St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, Netherlands; Franciscus Hospital, Roosendaal, Netherlands
| | - A Jager
- 1VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Comprehensive Cancer Centre the Netherlands, Netherlands; Isala Clinics, Zwolle, Netherlands; Erasmus Medical Center-Daniel den Hoed Cancer Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands; Tergooi Hospitals, Hilversum, Netherlands; Reinier de Graaf Hospital, Delft, Netherlands; The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Albert Schweitzer Hospital, Dordrecht, Netherlands; Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands; Vlietland Hospital, Schiedam, Netherlands; Medical Center Leeuwarden, Leeuwarden, Netherlands; Haga Hospital, The Hague, Netherlands; St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, Netherlands; Franciscus Hospital, Roosendaal, Netherlands
| | - AJ ten Tije
- 1VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Comprehensive Cancer Centre the Netherlands, Netherlands; Isala Clinics, Zwolle, Netherlands; Erasmus Medical Center-Daniel den Hoed Cancer Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands; Tergooi Hospitals, Hilversum, Netherlands; Reinier de Graaf Hospital, Delft, Netherlands; The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Albert Schweitzer Hospital, Dordrecht, Netherlands; Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands; Vlietland Hospital, Schiedam, Netherlands; Medical Center Leeuwarden, Leeuwarden, Netherlands; Haga Hospital, The Hague, Netherlands; St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, Netherlands; Franciscus Hospital, Roosendaal, Netherlands
| | - MMEM Bos
- 1VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Comprehensive Cancer Centre the Netherlands, Netherlands; Isala Clinics, Zwolle, Netherlands; Erasmus Medical Center-Daniel den Hoed Cancer Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands; Tergooi Hospitals, Hilversum, Netherlands; Reinier de Graaf Hospital, Delft, Netherlands; The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Albert Schweitzer Hospital, Dordrecht, Netherlands; Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands; Vlietland Hospital, Schiedam, Netherlands; Medical Center Leeuwarden, Leeuwarden, Netherlands; Haga Hospital, The Hague, Netherlands; St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, Netherlands; Franciscus Hospital, Roosendaal, Netherlands
| | - SC Linn
- 1VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Comprehensive Cancer Centre the Netherlands, Netherlands; Isala Clinics, Zwolle, Netherlands; Erasmus Medical Center-Daniel den Hoed Cancer Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands; Tergooi Hospitals, Hilversum, Netherlands; Reinier de Graaf Hospital, Delft, Netherlands; The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Albert Schweitzer Hospital, Dordrecht, Netherlands; Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands; Vlietland Hospital, Schiedam, Netherlands; Medical Center Leeuwarden, Leeuwarden, Netherlands; Haga Hospital, The Hague, Netherlands; St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, Netherlands; Franciscus Hospital, Roosendaal, Netherlands
| | - Bosch J van den
- 1VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Comprehensive Cancer Centre the Netherlands, Netherlands; Isala Clinics, Zwolle, Netherlands; Erasmus Medical Center-Daniel den Hoed Cancer Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands; Tergooi Hospitals, Hilversum, Netherlands; Reinier de Graaf Hospital, Delft, Netherlands; The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Albert Schweitzer Hospital, Dordrecht, Netherlands; Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands; Vlietland Hospital, Schiedam, Netherlands; Medical Center Leeuwarden, Leeuwarden, Netherlands; Haga Hospital, The Hague, Netherlands; St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, Netherlands; Franciscus Hospital, Roosendaal, Netherlands
| | - JWR Nortier
- 1VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Comprehensive Cancer Centre the Netherlands, Netherlands; Isala Clinics, Zwolle, Netherlands; Erasmus Medical Center-Daniel den Hoed Cancer Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands; Tergooi Hospitals, Hilversum, Netherlands; Reinier de Graaf Hospital, Delft, Netherlands; The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Albert Schweitzer Hospital, Dordrecht, Netherlands; Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands; Vlietland Hospital, Schiedam, Netherlands; Medical Center Leeuwarden, Leeuwarden, Netherlands; Haga Hospital, The Hague, Netherlands; St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, Netherlands; Franciscus Hospital, Roosendaal, Netherlands
| | - JJ Braun
- 1VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Comprehensive Cancer Centre the Netherlands, Netherlands; Isala Clinics, Zwolle, Netherlands; Erasmus Medical Center-Daniel den Hoed Cancer Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands; Tergooi Hospitals, Hilversum, Netherlands; Reinier de Graaf Hospital, Delft, Netherlands; The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Albert Schweitzer Hospital, Dordrecht, Netherlands; Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands; Vlietland Hospital, Schiedam, Netherlands; Medical Center Leeuwarden, Leeuwarden, Netherlands; Haga Hospital, The Hague, Netherlands; St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, Netherlands; Franciscus Hospital, Roosendaal, Netherlands
| | - H de Graaf
- 1VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Comprehensive Cancer Centre the Netherlands, Netherlands; Isala Clinics, Zwolle, Netherlands; Erasmus Medical Center-Daniel den Hoed Cancer Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands; Tergooi Hospitals, Hilversum, Netherlands; Reinier de Graaf Hospital, Delft, Netherlands; The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Albert Schweitzer Hospital, Dordrecht, Netherlands; Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands; Vlietland Hospital, Schiedam, Netherlands; Medical Center Leeuwarden, Leeuwarden, Netherlands; Haga Hospital, The Hague, Netherlands; St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, Netherlands; Franciscus Hospital, Roosendaal, Netherlands
| | - JEA Portielje
- 1VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Comprehensive Cancer Centre the Netherlands, Netherlands; Isala Clinics, Zwolle, Netherlands; Erasmus Medical Center-Daniel den Hoed Cancer Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands; Tergooi Hospitals, Hilversum, Netherlands; Reinier de Graaf Hospital, Delft, Netherlands; The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Albert Schweitzer Hospital, Dordrecht, Netherlands; Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands; Vlietland Hospital, Schiedam, Netherlands; Medical Center Leeuwarden, Leeuwarden, Netherlands; Haga Hospital, The Hague, Netherlands; St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, Netherlands; Franciscus Hospital, Roosendaal, Netherlands
| | - M Los
- 1VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Comprehensive Cancer Centre the Netherlands, Netherlands; Isala Clinics, Zwolle, Netherlands; Erasmus Medical Center-Daniel den Hoed Cancer Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands; Tergooi Hospitals, Hilversum, Netherlands; Reinier de Graaf Hospital, Delft, Netherlands; The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Albert Schweitzer Hospital, Dordrecht, Netherlands; Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands; Vlietland Hospital, Schiedam, Netherlands; Medical Center Leeuwarden, Leeuwarden, Netherlands; Haga Hospital, The Hague, Netherlands; St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, Netherlands; Franciscus Hospital, Roosendaal, Netherlands
| | - DD Gooyer
- 1VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Comprehensive Cancer Centre the Netherlands, Netherlands; Isala Clinics, Zwolle, Netherlands; Erasmus Medical Center-Daniel den Hoed Cancer Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands; Tergooi Hospitals, Hilversum, Netherlands; Reinier de Graaf Hospital, Delft, Netherlands; The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Albert Schweitzer Hospital, Dordrecht, Netherlands; Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands; Vlietland Hospital, Schiedam, Netherlands; Medical Center Leeuwarden, Leeuwarden, Netherlands; Haga Hospital, The Hague, Netherlands; St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, Netherlands; Franciscus Hospital, Roosendaal, Netherlands
| | - H van Tinteren
- 1VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Comprehensive Cancer Centre the Netherlands, Netherlands; Isala Clinics, Zwolle, Netherlands; Erasmus Medical Center-Daniel den Hoed Cancer Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands; Tergooi Hospitals, Hilversum, Netherlands; Reinier de Graaf Hospital, Delft, Netherlands; The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Albert Schweitzer Hospital, Dordrecht, Netherlands; Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands; Vlietland Hospital, Schiedam, Netherlands; Medical Center Leeuwarden, Leeuwarden, Netherlands; Haga Hospital, The Hague, Netherlands; St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, Netherlands; Franciscus Hospital, Roosendaal, Netherlands
| | - E Boven
- 1VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Comprehensive Cancer Centre the Netherlands, Netherlands; Isala Clinics, Zwolle, Netherlands; Erasmus Medical Center-Daniel den Hoed Cancer Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands; Tergooi Hospitals, Hilversum, Netherlands; Reinier de Graaf Hospital, Delft, Netherlands; The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Albert Schweitzer Hospital, Dordrecht, Netherlands; Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands; Vlietland Hospital, Schiedam, Netherlands; Medical Center Leeuwarden, Leeuwarden, Netherlands; Haga Hospital, The Hague, Netherlands; St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, Netherlands; Franciscus Hospital, Roosendaal, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
van DVS, Nortier JWR, Liefers GJ, ten TA, Kessels LW, van LHWM, van WLJC, Vriens B, van DBJ, van MKKE, van LE, Kroep JR. OT1-01-04: NEO-ZOTAC: A Phase III Randomized Trial with Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy (TAC) with or without Zoledronic Acid for Patients with HER2−Negative Large Resectable or Locally Advanced Breast Cancer. Cancer Res 2011. [DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.sabcs11-ot1-01-04] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background
The role of bisphosphonates (BPs) when added to the (neo) adjuvant treatment of breast cancer is still unknown. Adding the most potent BP zoledronic acid to neoadjuvant chemotherapy may lead to an improved clinical and pathological response in patients with breast cancer.
Trial design: After randomization, patients will be treated in arm A (experimental) or arm B (control group). Arm A: 6x TAC q 3 weeks with zoledronic acid; Doxorubicin 50 mg/m2 i.v. followed by Cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m2 i.v. and Docetaxel 75 mg/m2 i.v. on day 1, Pegylated G-CSF 6 mg once per cycle s.c on day 2, zoledronic acid 4 mg i.v in 15 minutes within 24 hours after infusion of chemotherapy. Arm B: 6x TAC q 3 weeks; Doxorubicin 50 mg/m2 i.v. followed by Cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m2 i.v. and Docetaxel 75 mg/m2 i.v. on day 1, Pegylated G-CSF 6 mg once per cycle s.c on day 2.
Eligibility criteria: Main inclusion criteria are large resectable or locally advanced breast cancer (T2,T3,T4, every N, M0), measurable disease, histological proven HER2−negative breast cancer, age ≥18 years, WHO 0–2, adequate bone marrow-, renal- and liver function, written informed consent. Main exclusion criteria are evidence of distant metastases (M1), history of breast cancer, prior breast surgery, prior chemotherapy or radiation therapy, previous malignancy within 5 years, prior bisphosphonate usage, peripheral neuropathy > grade 2, current active dental problems.
Study endpoints: The primary endpoint of this study is the pathologic complete response (pCR) rate to neoadjuvant chemotherapy with or without zoledronic acid at surgery. Secondary endpoints are clinical response (RECIST 1.1), ER/PR and HER2 heterogeneity in core biopsy vs. operation specimen, toxicity, disease free survival and overall survival.
Optional side studies include fluorescent imaging (SoftScan®), changes in bone biochemical markers and the insulin-like growth factor (IGF) pathway, circulating tumor cells (CTC's) and circulating endothelial cells (CEC's), the false-negative rate of the sentinel node biopsy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy, single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and Ki-67, apoptotic index and IGF pathway in core biopsy and operation specimen.
Statistical Methods: This study is designed as a randomized, open-label, multi centre phase III trial. It is anticipated that using a 5% significance level based on the two-sided Fisher's exact test with a power of 80%, a total number of 250 patients (125 patients in each arm) are needed to show an improvement of the pCR rates from 17% in arm B to 34% in the experimental arm A. Randomization will be done according to the Pocock's minimization technique stratified by cT-classification, cN-classification and estrogen receptor status. The primary endpoint will be analyzed using the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test.
An interim efficacy analysis (analyzing pCR) after 100 operated patients is planned.
Accrual: Patients are currently being included from 27 centers in the Netherlands. Presently (16th June 2011) a total number of 116 patients have been included since start of the study (July 2010). The expected end of accrual of 250 patients will be the last quarter of 2012.
Citation Information: Cancer Res 2011;71(24 Suppl):Abstract nr OT1-01-04.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- de Ven S van
- 1Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands; Amphia Hospital, Breda, Netherlands; Deventer Hospital, Deventer, Netherlands; University Medical Center St. Radboud Nijmegen, Nijmegen, Netherlands; Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, Netherlands; Academic Hospital Maastricht, Maastricht, Netherlands; Albert Schweitzer Hospital, Dordrecht, Netherlands; BOOG Study Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - JWR Nortier
- 1Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands; Amphia Hospital, Breda, Netherlands; Deventer Hospital, Deventer, Netherlands; University Medical Center St. Radboud Nijmegen, Nijmegen, Netherlands; Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, Netherlands; Academic Hospital Maastricht, Maastricht, Netherlands; Albert Schweitzer Hospital, Dordrecht, Netherlands; BOOG Study Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - GJ Liefers
- 1Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands; Amphia Hospital, Breda, Netherlands; Deventer Hospital, Deventer, Netherlands; University Medical Center St. Radboud Nijmegen, Nijmegen, Netherlands; Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, Netherlands; Academic Hospital Maastricht, Maastricht, Netherlands; Albert Schweitzer Hospital, Dordrecht, Netherlands; BOOG Study Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Tije A ten
- 1Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands; Amphia Hospital, Breda, Netherlands; Deventer Hospital, Deventer, Netherlands; University Medical Center St. Radboud Nijmegen, Nijmegen, Netherlands; Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, Netherlands; Academic Hospital Maastricht, Maastricht, Netherlands; Albert Schweitzer Hospital, Dordrecht, Netherlands; BOOG Study Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - LW Kessels
- 1Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands; Amphia Hospital, Breda, Netherlands; Deventer Hospital, Deventer, Netherlands; University Medical Center St. Radboud Nijmegen, Nijmegen, Netherlands; Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, Netherlands; Academic Hospital Maastricht, Maastricht, Netherlands; Albert Schweitzer Hospital, Dordrecht, Netherlands; BOOG Study Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Laarhoven HWM van
- 1Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands; Amphia Hospital, Breda, Netherlands; Deventer Hospital, Deventer, Netherlands; University Medical Center St. Radboud Nijmegen, Nijmegen, Netherlands; Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, Netherlands; Academic Hospital Maastricht, Maastricht, Netherlands; Albert Schweitzer Hospital, Dordrecht, Netherlands; BOOG Study Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Warmerdam LJC van
- 1Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands; Amphia Hospital, Breda, Netherlands; Deventer Hospital, Deventer, Netherlands; University Medical Center St. Radboud Nijmegen, Nijmegen, Netherlands; Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, Netherlands; Academic Hospital Maastricht, Maastricht, Netherlands; Albert Schweitzer Hospital, Dordrecht, Netherlands; BOOG Study Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - B Vriens
- 1Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands; Amphia Hospital, Breda, Netherlands; Deventer Hospital, Deventer, Netherlands; University Medical Center St. Radboud Nijmegen, Nijmegen, Netherlands; Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, Netherlands; Academic Hospital Maastricht, Maastricht, Netherlands; Albert Schweitzer Hospital, Dordrecht, Netherlands; BOOG Study Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - den Bosch J van
- 1Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands; Amphia Hospital, Breda, Netherlands; Deventer Hospital, Deventer, Netherlands; University Medical Center St. Radboud Nijmegen, Nijmegen, Netherlands; Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, Netherlands; Academic Hospital Maastricht, Maastricht, Netherlands; Albert Schweitzer Hospital, Dordrecht, Netherlands; BOOG Study Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Meershoek-Klein Kranenbarg E van
- 1Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands; Amphia Hospital, Breda, Netherlands; Deventer Hospital, Deventer, Netherlands; University Medical Center St. Radboud Nijmegen, Nijmegen, Netherlands; Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, Netherlands; Academic Hospital Maastricht, Maastricht, Netherlands; Albert Schweitzer Hospital, Dordrecht, Netherlands; BOOG Study Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Leeuwen E van
- 1Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands; Amphia Hospital, Breda, Netherlands; Deventer Hospital, Deventer, Netherlands; University Medical Center St. Radboud Nijmegen, Nijmegen, Netherlands; Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, Netherlands; Academic Hospital Maastricht, Maastricht, Netherlands; Albert Schweitzer Hospital, Dordrecht, Netherlands; BOOG Study Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - JR Kroep
- 1Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands; Amphia Hospital, Breda, Netherlands; Deventer Hospital, Deventer, Netherlands; University Medical Center St. Radboud Nijmegen, Nijmegen, Netherlands; Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, Netherlands; Academic Hospital Maastricht, Maastricht, Netherlands; Albert Schweitzer Hospital, Dordrecht, Netherlands; BOOG Study Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Perwitasari DA, Wessels JAM, van der Straaten RJHM, Baak-Pablo RF, Mustofa M, Hakimi M, Nortier JWR, Gelderblom H, Guchelaar HJ. Association of ABCB1, 5-HT3B receptor and CYP2D6 genetic polymorphisms with ondansetron and metoclopramide antiemetic response in Indonesian cancer patients treated with highly emetogenic chemotherapy. Jpn J Clin Oncol 2011; 41:1168-76. [PMID: 21840870 DOI: 10.1093/jjco/hyr117] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Suboptimal treatment of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting and unsatisfactory response to antiemetic drugs cause impairment of cancer patient's daily functioning. This study was aimed to investigate the association of selected germline polymorphisms with ondansetron and metoclopramide response in Indonesian cancer patients treated with highly emetogenic chemotherapy. METHODS We enrolled 202 chemotherapy naïve patients treated with cisplatin at a dosage of ≥50 mg/m(2) as monotherapy or as combined chemotherapy. Ondansetron 8 mg and dexamethasone 8 mg intravenously were the standard antiemetic therapy for prevention of acute chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting. Metoclopramide 10 mg orally, three times per day as fixed prescription, was given until 5 days after chemotherapy to prevent delayed chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting. Primary and secondary outcomes were the occurrence of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in the acute and delayed phase. The following single-nucleotide polymorphisms were determined in ABCB1: rs1045642, rs2032582 and rs1128503; in 5-HT3B-R: rs45460698, rs4938058 and rs7943062; and in CYP2D6: rs16947 (CYP2D6 2), rs3892097 (CYP2D6 4) and rs1065852 (CYP2D6 10) using Taqman assays. RESULTS During the acute phase, 21.8 and 30.2% patients experienced Grade 3 and 4 nausea and vomiting, respectively, whereas 38.6% patients experienced nausea and/or vomiting in the delayed phase. Carriers of the CTG haplotype of the ABCB1 gene experienced Grade 3 and 4 chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting more often than other haplotypes in the delayed phase (P< 0.05). No associations were found with the 5-HT3B receptor haplotypes and CYP2D6-predicted phenotypes. CONCLUSIONS Our study shows that in Indonesian cancer patients treated with highly cytostatic emetogenic, carriership of the CTG haplotype of the ABCB1 gene is related to an increased risk of delayed chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting.
Collapse
|
31
|
Schilder CMT, Seynaeve C, Linn SC, Boogerd W, Beex LVAM, Gundy CM, Nortier JWR, van de Velde CJH, van Dam FSAM, Schagen SB. Self-reported cognitive functioning in postmenopausal breast cancer patients before and during endocrine treatment: findings from the neuropsychological TEAM side-study. Psychooncology 2011; 21:479-87. [PMID: 21351188 DOI: 10.1002/pon.1928] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2010] [Revised: 12/23/2010] [Accepted: 12/27/2010] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study aimed to evaluate self-reported cognitive functioning of postmenopausal breast cancer patients before and during endocrine treatment compared with healthy female controls, and to investigate associations between self-reported cognitive functioning, cognitive test performance and anxiety/depression, fatigue, and menopausal complaints. METHODS Self-reported cognitive functioning, anxiety/depression, fatigue, menopausal complaints, and cognitive tests performance were assessed before (T1) and after 1 year (T2) of adjuvant endocrine treatment in postmenopausal chemotherapy-naïve breast cancer patients. Self-reported cognitive functioning was assessed by the cognitive failures questionnaire and interview questions concerning cognitive complaints. Patients participated in the TEAM-trial, a prospective randomized study investigating tamoxifen versus exemestane as adjuvant therapy for hormone-sensitive breast cancer. Identical information was obtained from healthy postmenopausal volunteers. RESULTS Two measures for self-reported cognitive functioning provided the distinctive results. At T1 and T2, healthy controls reported a higher frequency of cognitive failures than patients; change over time did not differ between groups. The prevalence of cognitive complaints did not differ between the groups at T1, but change over time regarding attention/concentration complaints differed between groups, due to an increased prevalence in tamoxifen users. Self-reported cognitive functioning showed moderate associations with anxiety/depression, fatigue, and menopausal complaints. Cognitive test performance was not associated with self-reported cognitive functioning, but weakly with anxiety/depression and fatigue. CONCLUSION Adjuvant therapy with tamoxifen and exemestane did not influence the self-reported frequency of cognitive failures. Increased attention/concentration complaints were observed in tamoxifen users, but not in exemestane users. This latter finding should be confirmed with better validated instruments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C M T Schilder
- Department of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
Kroep JR, Linn SC, Boven E, Bloemendal HJ, Baas J, Mandjes IAM, van den Bosch J, Smit WM, de Graaf H, Schröder CP, Vermeulen GJ, Hop WCJ, Nortier JWR. Lapatinib: clinical benefit in patients with HER 2-positive advanced breast cancer. Neth J Med 2010; 68:371-376. [PMID: 20876920] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/29/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Lapatinib, a tyrosine kinase inhibitor of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), has shown activity in combination with capecitabine in patients with HER2-positive advanced breast cancer progressive on standard treatment regimens. We present results on preapproval drug access for this combination in such patients occurring in the general oncology practice in the Netherlands. METHODS Patients with HER2-positive advanced breast cancer progressive on schedules containing anthracyclines, taxanes, and trastuzumab were eligible. Brain metastases were allowed if stable. Lapatinib 1250 mg÷day was given continuously in combination with capecitabine 1000 mg÷m2 twice daily for two weeks in a three-week cycle. Efficacy was assessed by use of response evaluation criteria in solid tumours version 1.0. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated. RESULTS Eighty-three patients were enrolled from January 2007 until July 2008. The combination was generally well tolerated and the most common drug-related serious adverse events were nausea and÷or vomiting (5%) and diarrhoea (2%). Seventy-eight patients were evaluable for response. Clinical benefit (response or stable disease for at least 12 weeks) was observed in 50 patients (64%) of whom 15 had a partial response and 35 stable disease. The median PFS and OS were 17 weeks (95% CI: 13 to 21) and 39 weeks (95% CI: 24 to 54), respectively. For OS, higher Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) status (p=0.016), brain metastases at study entry (p=0.010) and higher number of metastatic sites (p=0.012) were significantly negative predictive factors. CONCLUSION In a patient population with heavily pretreated HER2-positive advanced breast cancer lapatinib plus capecitabine was well tolerated and offered clinical benefit.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J R Kroep
- Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
33
|
Baas JM, Kapiteijn E, Pereira AM, Nortier JWR. Atypical Cushing's syndrome caused by ectopic ACTH secretion of an oesophageal adenocarcinoma. Neth J Med 2010; 68:265-267. [PMID: 20558857] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/29/2023]
Abstract
We present an atypical case of Cushing's syndrome caused by ectopic adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) secretion in a patient with a metastasised adenocarcinoma of the oesophagus. After chemotherapy and surgery the patient developed generalised oedema, hyperpigmentation and dysphagia. Laboratory tests showed hypokalaemia, normal urinary potassium, increased 24-hour urinary free cortisol excretion and serum ACTH within the normal reference range. The diagnosis of ACTH-dependent Cushing's syndrome was made, most probably caused by ectopic production of ACTH. In addition to combined chemotherapy, treatment with ketoconazole sufficiently reduced urinary cortisol excretion and relieved the symptoms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J M Baas
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
van Iersel LBJ, Koopman M, van de Velde CJH, Mol L, van Persijn van Meerten EL, Hartgrink HH, Kuppen PJK, Vahrmeijer AL, Nortier JWR, Tollenaar RAEM, Punt C, Gelderblom H. Management of isolated nonresectable liver metastases in colorectal cancer patients: a case-control study of isolated hepatic perfusion with melphalan versus systemic chemotherapy. Ann Oncol 2010; 21:1662-1667. [PMID: 20110289 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdp589] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND To compare the median overall survival of patients with isolated nonresectable liver metastases in comparable groups of patients treated with either isolated hepatic perfusion (IHP) with melphalan or systemic chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS Colorectal cancer patients with isolated liver metastases, who underwent IHP, were included in this study. The control group consisted of a subgroup of colorectal cancer patients with liver metastases only, who were enrolled in the randomized CApecitabine, IRinotecan, Oxaliplatin (CAIRO) phase III study. RESULTS Ninety-nine patients were treated with IHP, and 111 patients were included in the control group. All patient characteristics were comparable except for age. Median follow-up was 78.1 months for IHP versus 54.7 months in the control group. Median overall survival was 25.0 [95% confidence interval (CI) 19.4-30.6] months for IHP and 21.7 (95% CI 19.6-23.8) months for systemic treatment and did not differ significantly (P = 0.29). Treatment-related mortality was 2% for the systemic treatment and 6% for IHP (P = 0.11). CONCLUSION Compared with a patient group with comparable characteristics treated with systemic chemotherapy, IHP does not provide a benefit in overall survival in patients with isolated nonresectable colorectal liver metastases. Currently, the use of IHP cannot be advocated outside the scope of clinical studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L B J van Iersel
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden
| | - M Koopman
- Department of Medical Oncology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center, Nijmegen
| | | | - L Mol
- Comprehensive Cancer Centre East (IKO), Nijmegen
| | | | - H H Hartgrink
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden
| | - P J K Kuppen
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden
| | - A L Vahrmeijer
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden
| | - J W R Nortier
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden
| | | | - C Punt
- Department of Medical Oncology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center, Nijmegen
| | - H Gelderblom
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden.
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Schilder CMT, Seynaeve C, Linn SC, Boogerd W, Beex LVAM, Gundy CM, Nortier JWR, van de Velde CJH, van Dam FSAM, Schagen SB. Cognitive functioning of postmenopausal breast cancer patients before adjuvant systemic therapy, and its association with medical and psychological factors. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2009; 76:133-41. [PMID: 20036141 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2009.11.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2009] [Revised: 10/22/2009] [Accepted: 11/04/2009] [Indexed: 01/21/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE This study aimed to identify medical and psychological predictors for cognitive performance of breast cancer (BC) patients before the start of adjuvant systemic treatment and to compare cognitive performance between BC patients and healthy controls adjusting for medical and psychological variables. MATERIAL 205 postmenopausal BC patients underwent pre-treatment neuropsychological tests and provided medical and psychological data. 124 healthy controls underwent the same assessment. RESULTS 'Treatment for diabetes mellitus' and/or 'hypertension', 'less hours spent on cognitively stimulating activities', 'fewer days since surgery' and 'more reproductive years' were associated with worse cognitive performance in the BC patients, independent of age and IQ. Cognitive differences between BC patients and healthy controls could partly be explained by the evaluated variables. CONCLUSION The results stress the need for adjustment for pre-treatment cognitive differences between study groups, and also indicate that further research into pre-treatment cognitive dysfunction is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C M T Schilder
- Dept. of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
van Nes JGH, Seynaeve C, Maartense E, Roumen RMH, de Jong RS, Beex LVAM, Meershoek-Klein Kranenbarg WM, Putter H, Nortier JWR, van de Velde CJH. Patterns of care in Dutch postmenopausal patients with hormone-sensitive early breast cancer participating in the Tamoxifen Exemestane Adjuvant Multinational (TEAM) trial. Ann Oncol 2009; 21:974-82. [PMID: 19875752 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdp419] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Tamoxifen and Exemestane Adjuvant Multinational (TEAM) trial investigates the efficacy and safety of adjuvant exemestane alone and in sequence after tamoxifen in postmenopausal women with hormone-sensitive early breast cancer. As there was a nationwide participation in The Netherlands, we studied the variations in patterns of care in the Comprehensive Cancer Centre Regions (CCCRs) and compliance with national guidelines. METHODS Clinicopathological characteristics, carried out local treatment strategies and adjuvant chemotherapy data were collected. RESULTS From 2001 to January 2006, 2754 Dutch patients were randomised to the study. Mean age of patients was 65 years (standard deviation 9). Tumours were < or =2 cm in 46% (within CCCRs 39%-50%), node-negative disease varied from 25% to 45%, and PgR status was determined in 75%-100% of patients. Mastectomy was carried out in 55% (45%-70%), sentinel lymph node procedure in 68% (42%-79%) and axillary lymph node dissections in 77% (67%-83%) of patients, all different between CCCRs (P < 0.0001). Adjuvant chemotherapy was given in 15%-70% of eligible patients (P < 0.001). DISCUSSION In spite of national guidelines, breast cancer treatment on specific issues widely varied between the various Dutch regions. These data provide valuable information for breast cancer organisations indicating (lack of) guideline adherence and areas for breast cancer care improvement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J G H van Nes
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
37
|
Woei-A-Jin FJSH, Kapiteijn E, Nortier JWR, Osanto S. Abdominal pain, low grade fever and persistent shock. Neth J Med 2009; 67:288-292. [PMID: 19687524] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/28/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- F J S H Woei-A-Jin
- Department of General Internal Medicine, Leiden University Medical Centre, PO Box 9600, 2300 RC Leiden, the Netherlands.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
38
|
Kweekel DM, Antonini NF, Nortier JWR, Punt CJA, Gelderblom H, Guchelaar HJ. Explorative study to identify novel candidate genes related to oxaliplatin efficacy and toxicity using a DNA repair array. Br J Cancer 2009; 101:357-62. [PMID: 19536092 PMCID: PMC2720215 DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605134] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose: To identify new polymorphisms (single nucleotide polymorphisms, SNPs) in DNA repair pathways that are associated with efficacy and toxicity in patients receiving oxaliplatin and capecitabine for advanced colorectal cancer (ACC). Methods: We studied progression-free survival (PFS) in 91 ACC patients, of whom germ-line DNA was isolated and genotyped using an Asper Biotech array. Overall survival (OS) and toxicity were studied as secondary end points. A step-wise selection of SNPs was performed, involving univariate and multivariate log-rank tests and Cox regression analysis, with age and performance status as covariates. Results: A total of 81 SNPs in 46 genes on the array were selected for further analysis, based on genotyping success rates and minor allele frequencies. After step-wise selection, we found that homozygosity for the ataxia telangiectasia mutated gene (ATM) rs1801516 or excision repair cross-complementing gene (ERCC5) rs1047768 SNPs was associated with shorter PFS; however there were no significant associations (P>0.01) with OS or toxicity. Discussion: This is the first study describing the pathway gene approach for the selection of new candidate genes involved in oxaliplatin efficacy and toxicity. The results suggest that the ATM and ERCC5 genes may be associated with oxaliplatin efficacy in ACC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D M Kweekel
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Toxicology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
39
|
Struikmans H, Nortier JWR, Rutgers EJT, Zonderland HM, Bontenbal M, Elkhuizen PHM, van Tienhoven G, Tjan-Heijnen VCG, van Vegchel T, Tuut MK, Benraadt J. [Guideline 'Treatment of breast cancer 2008' (revision)]. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 2008; 152:2507-2511. [PMID: 19055257] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/27/2023]
Abstract
The Dutch evidence-based guideline 'Treatment of breast cancer' has been revised, and integrated with the guideline 'Screening for and diagnosis of breast cancer'. The guideline can be found on www. oncoline.nl and on www.cbo.nl. The Internet programme 'Adjuvant!' (www.adjuvantonline.com) can be used to predict both the prognosis and the efficacy of systemic adjuvant therapy for each patient. The indications for adjuvant chemotherapy and endocrine therapy have been widened. The aim is to reduce the absolute probability of death by at least 4-5% within 10 years. The goal of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in operable breast cancer is to enable breast-conserving therapy for large tumours in relatively small breasts. One could consider transferring responsibility for follow-up after 5 years from the hospital to the screening organisation following mastectomy, to the family doctor following breast-conserving therapy, and to an outpatient clinic for hereditary tumours in carriers of gene mutation. Cessation of follow-up above the age of 75 could also be considered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H Struikmans
- Medisch Centrum Haaglanden, afd. Radiotherapie, Den Haag.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
40
|
Jenninga E, Kroep JR, Hilders CGJM, Louwé LA, Verburg HJ, Nortier JWR. [Fertility preservation in female oncology patients]. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 2008; 152:2437-2441. [PMID: 19051792] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/27/2023]
Abstract
Four women were referred to the department ofGynaecology for fertility preservation. A 33-year-old nulliparous woman with breast cancer stage pT1cN0M0 underwent an IVF-ICSI cycle; five embryos were frozen. Pre-implantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) because of BRCA2 gene mutation carriage was not carried out and more recently follow-up oocyte donation options are being considered. A second, 32-year-old nulliparous woman with breast cancer stage pT2N1M0 underwent an IVF cycle; seven embryos were frozen. The third patient was a 14-year-old girl with osteosarcoma of the distal femur, who underwent a laparoscopic unilateral ovariectomy, one day after referral, and cortical tissue was frozen. The fourth patient was a 33-year-old nulliparous woman without partner, with non-Hodgkin lymphoma stage IIA. She underwent laparoscopic ovariectomy and cortical tissue was frozen. Infertility due to cancer treatment and fertility preservation options should be discussed early in treatment planning. Patients' expectations and fertility preservation limitations are important to consider. Fertility preservation options can be conducted in specialised hospitals under institutional review board approval. It still has an experimental status.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E Jenninga
- Afd. Gynaecologie, Leids Universitair Medisch Centrum, Leiden.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
41
|
van Iersel LBJ, Gelderblom H, Vahrmeijer AL, van Persijn van Meerten EL, Tijl FGJ, Putter H, Hartgrink HH, Kuppen PJK, Nortier JWR, Tollenaar RAEM, van de Velde CJH. Isolated hepatic melphalan perfusion of colorectal liver metastases: outcome and prognostic factors in 154 patients. Ann Oncol 2008; 19:1127-34. [PMID: 18304962 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdn032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aim of this study was to identify prognostic factors for local and systemic failure after isolated hepatic perfusion (IHP) with 200 mg melphalan in patients with colorectal liver metastases. PATIENTS AND METHODS Hundred and fifty-four patients were selected for IHP and underwent laparotomy. Patients were monitored for response, toxicity and survival. Univariate and multivariate analyses were carried out to identify prognostic factors for hepatic response and progression-free and overall survival. RESULTS Hepatic response rate was 50% with a median progression-free and overall survival of, respectively, 7.4 and 24.8 months. In multivariate analyses, absence of ability to perfuse through the hepatic artery (P = 0.003), severe postoperative complications (P = 0.048) and >10 liver metastases (P = 0.006) adversely influenced overall survival and no adjuvant chemotherapy adversely influenced progression-free survival. CONCLUSION This is the first study to report prognostic factors for survival after IHP. Possibly, overall and disease-free survival can increase if preoperative screening is improved. In future studies on IHP, adjuvant chemotherapy should be considered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L B J van Iersel
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
42
|
Venturini M, Paridaens R, Rossner D, Vaslamatzis MM, Nortier JWR, Salzberg M, Rodrigues H, Bell R. An open-label, multicenter study of outpatient capecitabine monotherapy in 631 patients with pretreated advanced breast cancer. Oncology 2007; 72:51-7. [PMID: 18004077 DOI: 10.1159/000111094] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2007] [Accepted: 06/29/2007] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Phase II/III trials have shown that capecitabine is an active, well-tolerated therapy for metastatic breast cancer (MBC). We report clinical findings from an expanded access program enabling patients ineligible for investigative trials to receive capecitabine before its approval and availability. METHODS Patients pretreated with at least two chemotherapy regimens, including a taxane, for MBC received oral capecitabine until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. RESULTS Six hundred and thirty-one patients received capecitabine (mean duration 3.8 months, range 0.1-24.7 months). The most common treatment-related grade 3/4 toxicities were diarrhea (9%) and hand-foot syndrome (8%). Grade 3/4 alopecia was absent and grade 3/4 myelosuppression was rare. Dose was modified in 172 patients (27%). Objective response rate in 349 evaluable patients was 35%. Median time to progression (n = 604) was 6.6 months (95% confidence interval, CI, 5.6-7.6) and median overall survival (n = 569) was 10.0 months (95% CI, 8.5-15.3). CONCLUSIONS Our findings in a cohort of patients with pretreated progressive breast cancer confirm the high efficacy and tolerability of outpatient capecitabine.
Collapse
|
43
|
Nout RA, Fiets WE, Struikmans H, Rosendaal FR, Putter H, Nortier JWR. The in- or exclusion of non-breast cancer related death and contralateral breast cancer significantly affects estimated outcome probability in early breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2007; 109:567-72. [PMID: 17661169 PMCID: PMC2668629 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-007-9681-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2007] [Accepted: 07/09/2007] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
A wide variation of definitions of recurrent disease and survival are used in the analyses of outcome of patients with early breast cancer. Explicit definitions with details both on endpoints and censoring are provided in less than half of published studies. We evaluated the effects of various definitions of survival and recurrent disease on estimated outcome in a prospectively determined cohort of 463 patients with primary breast cancer. Outcome estimates were determined both by the Kaplan-Meier and a competing risk method. In- or exclusion of contralateral breast cancer or non-disease related death in the definition of recurrent disease or survival significantly affects estimated outcome probability. The magnitude of this finding was dependent on patient-, tumour-, and treatment characteristics. Knowledge of the contribution of non-disease related death or contralateral breast cancer to estimated recurrent disease rate and overall death rate is indispensable for a correct interpretation and comparison of outcome analyses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R A Nout
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, P.O. Box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
44
|
van Nes JGH, Seynaeve C, van de Velde CJH, Nortier JWR. [Optimal adjuvant hormone therapy in postmenopausal women with hormone-sensitive mammary carcinoma: tamoxifen and the aromatase inhibitors anastrozole, exemestane and letrozole]. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 2006; 150:2863-9. [PMID: 17319217] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/14/2023]
Abstract
Postmenopausal patients with hormone-sensitive breast cancer may be eligible for adjuvant hormone therapy. - For years, tamoxifen was the treatment of choice. - However, the side effects associated with tamoxifen, such as endometrial cancer and thromboembolic disorders, and the search for more effective agents have led to the introduction of new hormonal therapies. - The results of randomised trials with the third-generation aromatase inhibitors anastrozole, exemestane and letrozole demonstrate improved efficacy compared to tamoxifen. - Using aromatase inhibitors, the disease-free survival is prolonged and recent data from some studies also show a benefit in overall survival. - Aromatase inhibitors are associated with specific side effects consisting of osteoporosis/increased incidence of fractures and myalgia/arthralgia.
Collapse
|
45
|
Kroep JR, Gelderblom H, Collen AFS, Nortier JWR. [Long-term beneficial effects of cetuximab in a woman with metastasised rectal carcinoma without expression of the epidermal growth factor receptor]. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 2006; 150:2555-9. [PMID: 17152334] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/12/2023]
Abstract
A 37-year-old woman presented with an epidermal growth factor-(EGFR)-negative rectum carcinoma with liver metastases. After extensive treatment, consisting of first-line chemotherapy, low anterior resection, isolated liver perfusion, second- and third-line chemotherapy and a pericardiodesis with bleomycin, she was subsequently treated with combination irinotecan and cetuximab therapy. At her last follow-up she had had long-term stable disease for 18 months with clinical benefit. Cetuximab is a monoclonal antibody which targets EGFRR. This exceptional case illustrates that treatment with cetuximab may be of benefit to a patient with EGFR-negative colorectal cancer. The exact mechanism of action and the role ofcetuximab in the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer have still to be determined.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J R Kroep
- Afd. Medische Oncologie, Leids Universitair Medisch Centrum, Postbus 9600, 2300 RC Leiden
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
46
|
Hospers GAP, Schaapveld M, Nortier JWR, Wils J, van Bochove A, de Jong RS, Creemers GJ, Erjavec Z, de Gooyer DJ, Slee PHTJ, Gerrits CJH, Smit JM, Mulder NH. Randomised Phase III study of biweekly 24-h infusion of high-dose 5FU with folinic acid and oxaliplatin versus monthly plus 5-FU/folinic acid in first-line treatment of advanced colorectal cancer. Ann Oncol 2006; 17:443-9. [PMID: 16500914 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdj104] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND A phase III study was started to compare oxaliplatin/5FU/LV in the first-line with bolus FU/LV in metastatic colorectal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS 302 patients were randomised and received bolus 5-FU 425 mg/m(2) day 1-5, FA 20 mg/m(2) day 1-5, q 4 wk or oxaliplatin 85 mg/m(2), 2 h-infusion, FA 200 mg/m(2), 1-h infusion. 5-FU 2600 mg/m(2), 24-h infusion day 1, q 2 wk. The primary endpoint was response rate (RR). RESULTS The median follow-up is 31.8 months, 90.4% of the patients have died. Confirmed RR, progression free survival (PFS; months) and median overall survival (OS; months) in 5FU/LV versus 5FU/LV/oxaliplatin were respectively 18.5% versus (vs) 33.8% (P = 0.004), 5.6 vs 6.7 (P = 0.016) and 13.3 vs 13.8 (P = 0.619). In the 5FU/LV/oxaliplatin arm less grade (3/4) toxicity was measured for diarrhoea, stomatitis, an increase in idiosyncratic side effects and neurosensory events compared with 5FU/LV. The quality of life (QOL) was equal in both arms. Second line treatment was given in 62% of the patients, crossover of 5FU/LV to 5FU/LV/oxaliplatin occurred in 14%. CONCLUSIONS Oxaliplatin in the first-line resulted in an increased RR and PFS with less grade 3/4 mucositis/diarrhoea compared with 5FU/LV alone. Idiosyncratic side effects deserve attention with oxaliplatin. Despite a low treatment cross over rate, OS in both groups was comparable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G A P Hospers
- Department of Medical Oncology, University of Groningen and University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
47
|
Netelenbos T, Nooij MA, Nortier JWR. Diabetes insipidus and adrenal insufficiency in a patient with metastatic breast cancer. Neth J Med 2006; 64:310-3. [PMID: 16990696] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/11/2023]
Abstract
A patient previously treated for bilateral breast cancer with mastectomy, radiation therapy and in remission on hormonal therapy for more than five years presented with abdominal symptoms from breast cancer relapse. She developed inappropriate polyuria and hypernatraemia, which responded to desmopressin. In combination with the absence of a high signal from the posterior lobe of the pituitary on MRI , these data indicated the presence of partial central diabetes insipidus. The anterior pituitary showed partial failure (low follicle-stimulating hormone, luteinising hormone and insulin-like growth factor-1 levels). Furthermore, primary adrenal insufficiency had developed, ascribed to bilateral tumour invasion of the adrenals. This rare combination of endocrinological failures in a patient with metastatic breast cancer is discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T Netelenbos
- Department of Internal Medicine, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
Kleijn WC, Ogoshi K, Yamaoka K, Shigehisa T, Takeda Y, Creutzberg CL, Nortier JWR, Kaptein AA. Conceptual equivalence and health-related quality of life: an exploratory study in Japanese and Dutch cancer patients. Qual Life Res 2006; 15:1091-101. [PMID: 16900289 DOI: 10.1007/s11136-006-0049-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/01/2006] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
Research into the equivalence of Western and Japanese conceptualizations of health-related quality of life (HR-QOL) is scarce. We used the Western (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, EORTC-QLQ-C30) and the Japanese (HRQoL-20) questionnaire in order to analyze the conceptual similarity of HR-QOL factors, and the associations between specific symptom items with overall HR-QOL in Japanese (n=265) and Dutch (n=174) patients with various types of cancer. Both populations completed both instruments. In both patient groups, the overall health scale of the EORTC-QLQ-C30 correlated highly (r=0.59; p<0.001) with the HRQOL-20 composite average score, indicating substantial conceptual comparability. Relationships between all EORTC-QLQ-C30 symptom items with HR-QOL were examined by ranking their correlations with the two overall measures of HR-QOL. Comparable patterns in the Japanese and Dutch samples were observed. The results suggest a considerable conceptual equivalence of HR-QOL in Japanese and Dutch cancer patients, and indicate a satisfactory structural and cross-cultural equivalence for the EORTC-QLQ-C30 with regard to items measuring functioning and specific symptoms. Longitudinal studies are needed to examine the impact of specific symptoms on general quality of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- W Chr Kleijn
- Medical Psychology, Leiden University Medical Center, P. O. Box 9555, 2300 RB, Leiden, The Netherlands.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
49
|
Barrett-Lee P, Bokemeyer C, Gascón P, Nortier JWR, Schneider M, Schrijvers D, Van Belle S. Management of cancer-related anemia in patients with breast or gynecologic cancer: new insights based on results from the European Cancer Anemia Survey. Oncologist 2006; 10:743-57. [PMID: 16249356 DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.10-9-743] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
The incidence, prevalence, and treatment of anemia (hemoglobin [Hb] <12 g/dl) in women with breast cancer and gynecologic cancer were evaluated using data from the European Cancer Anemia Survey (ECAS). Adult patients with newly diagnosed treated or untreated disease, persistent/recurrent disease, and disease in remission were enrolled and followed for up to six chemotherapy cycles or six evaluation points within a 6-month period. At enrollment, 30.4% of breast cancer patients and 49.1% of gynecologic cancer patients were anemic. A significant correlation was shown between low Hb level and poor performance status (World Health Organization criteria) at enrollment for both breast cancer and gynecologic cancer patients. In all, 62.4% of breast cancer patients and 81.4% of gynecologic cancer patients were anemic at some time during the survey. The incidence of anemia, determined in a carefully defined population, was 59.8% for breast cancer patients and 74.8% for gynecologic cancer patients. Despite the high prevalence and incidence of anemia, only 26.3% and 42.7% of patients in the respective groups received anemia treatment. In breast cancer patients, the mean Hb trigger was 10 g/dl for epoetin treatment and 8.6 g/dl for transfusion; corresponding values for gynecologic cancer patients were 10.1 g/dl and 9.1 g/dl. Logistic regression analyses in the overall ECAS population identified five factors as significant and suitable predictors of anemia: lower initial Hb, having lung or gynecologic cancer versus gastrointestinal/colorectal cancer, any other cancer versus gastrointestinal/colorectal cancer, treatment with platinum chemotherapy, and being female. The ECAS data highlight the need for greater awareness of the adverse impact of anemia on cancer patients and for optimal anemia management to ensure maximal patient quality of life.
Collapse
|
50
|
Jansen SJT, Otten W, Baas-Thijssen MCM, van de Velde CJH, Nortier JWR, Stiggelbout AM. Explaining differences in attitude toward adjuvant chemotherapy between experienced and inexperienced breast cancer patients. J Clin Oncol 2005; 23:6623-30. [PMID: 16170169 DOI: 10.1200/jco.2005.07.171] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Previous studies have shown that patients who have experienced adjuvant chemotherapy (experienced patients) have a more favorable attitude towards chemotherapy than those who have not (inexperienced patients). However, not much is known about the reasons underlying this difference. According to the Theory of Planned Behavior, the attitude towards a particular behavior (eg, accepting chemotherapy) is based on beliefs about the likelihood of outcomes of the behavior and the evaluations of these outcomes. We used this theory to explore in what way the beliefs of experienced patients differed from those of inexperienced patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS A cross-sectional survey was undertaken among 719 patients who had been treated for early-stage breast cancer between 1998 and 2003. Patients were asked, first, to indicate the likelihood of six positive and six negative outcomes of undergoing chemotherapy and, second, to give their evaluation of these outcomes. RESULTS Four hundred forty-six women filled in the questionnaire (response rate, 62%). As hypothesized, experienced patients (ie, patients who had been treated with adjuvant chemotherapy as part of their primary treatment plan) had a more positive attitude towards chemotherapy. Experienced patients provided higher likelihood estimates of treatment advantages, such as life prolongation. In addition, they evaluated the positive outcomes of chemotherapy more favorably. With regard to the negative outcomes of chemotherapy, few differences were observed between treatment groups. CONCLUSION Experienced patients have more confidence in the positive outcomes of chemotherapy than inexperienced patients. This might be the result of a cognitive mechanism to justify the way in which patients were treated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S J T Jansen
- Department of Medical Decision Making, Leiden University Medical Center, PO Box 9600, 2300 RC Leiden, the Netherlands.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|