A randomized placebo-controlled trial of elafibranor in patients with primary biliary cholangitis and incomplete response to UDCA

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Patients with primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) who have an incomplete response to ursodeoxycholic acid remain at risk of disease progression. We investigated the safety and efficacy of elafibranor, a dual PPARα/δ agonist, in patients with PBC.

METHODS

This 12-week, double-blind phase II trial enrolled 45 adults with PBC who had incomplete response to ursodeoxycholic acid (alkaline phosphatase levels ≥1.67-fold the upper limit of normal (ULN). Patients were randomly assigned to elafibranor 80 mg, elafibranor 120 mg or placebo. The primary endpoint was the relative change of ALP at 12 weeks (NCT03124108).

RESULTS

At 12 weeks, ALP was reduced by -48.3±14.8% in the elafibranor 80 mg group (p <0.001 vs. placebo) and by -40.6±17.4% in the elafibranor 120 mg group (p <0.001) compared to a +3.2±14.8% increase in the placebo group. The composite endpoint of ALP ≤1.67-fold the ULN, decrease of ALP >15% and total bilirubin below the ULN was achieved in 67% patients in the elafibranor 80 mg group and 79% patients in the elafibranor 120 mg group, vs. 6.7% patients in the placebo group. Levels of gamma-glutamyltransferase decreased by 37.0±25.5% in the elafibranor 80 mg group (p <0.001) and 40.0±24.1% in the elafibranor 120 mg group (p <0.01) compared to no change (+0.2±26.0%) in the placebo group. Levels of disease markers such as IgM, 5'-nucleotidase or high-sensitivity C-reactive protein were likewise reduced by elafibranor. Pruritus was not induced or exacerbated by elafibranor and patients with pruritus at baseline reported less pruritic symptoms at the end of treatment. All possibly drug-related non-serious adverse events were mild to moderate.

CONCLUSION

In this randomized phase II trial, elafibranor was generally safe and well tolerated and significantly reduced levels of ALP, composite endpoints of bilirubin and ALP, as well as other markers of disease activity in patients with PBC and an incomplete response to ursodeoxycholic acid.

LAY SUMMARY

Patients with primary biliary cholangitis (a rare chronic liver disease) that do not respond to standard therapy remain at risk of disease progression toward cirrhosis and impaired quality of life. Elafibranor is a nuclear receptor agonist that we tested in a randomized clinical trial over 12 weeks. It successfully decreased levels of disease activity markers, including alkaline phosphatase. Thus, this study is the foundation for a larger prospective study that will determine the efficacy and safety of this drug as a second-line therapy.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

Clinical Trials.gov NCT03124108.

Donor and transplant candidate selection for solid organ transplantation during the COVID-19 pandemic

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2), a novel coronavirus responsible for a worldwide pandemic has forced drastic changes in medical practice in an alarmingly short period of time. Caregivers must modify their strategies as well as optimize the utilization of resources to ensure public and patient safety. For organ transplantation, in particular, the loss of lifesaving organs for transplantation could lead to increased waitlist mortality. The priority is to select uninfected donors to transplant uninfected recipients while maintaining safety for health care systems in the backdrop of a virulent pandemic. We do not yet have a standard approach to evaluating donors and recipients with possible SARS-CoV-2 infection. Our current communication shares a protocol for donor and transplant recipient selection during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic to continue lifesaving solid organ transplantation for heart, lung, liver, and kidney recipients. The initial results using this protocol are presented here and meant to encourage dialogue between providers, offering ideas to improve safety in solid organ transplantation with limited health care resources. This protocol was created utilizing the guidelines of various organizations and from the clinical experience of the authors and will continue to evolve as more is understood about SARS-CoV-2 and how it affects organ donors and transplant recipients.

Effects of Belapectin, an Inhibitor of Galectin-3, in Patients With Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis With Cirrhosis and Portal Hypertension

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Increased levels of galectin 3 have been associated with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) and contribute to toxin-induced liver fibrosis in mice. GR-MD-02 (belapectin) is an inhibitor of galectin 3 that reduces liver fibrosis and portal hypertension in rats and was safe and well tolerated in phase 1 studies. We performed a phase 2b, randomized trial of the safety and efficacy of GR-MD-02 in patients with NASH, cirrhosis, and portal hypertension.

METHODS

Patients with NASH, cirrhosis, and portal hypertension (hepatic venous pressure gradient [HVPG] ≥ 6 mm Hg) from 36 centers were randomly assigned, in a double-blind manner, to groups that received biweekly infusions of belapectin 2 mg/kg (n = 54), 8 mg/kg (n = 54), or placebo (n = 54) for 52 weeks. The primary endpoint was change in HVPG (Δ HVPG) at the end of the 52-week period compared with baseline. Secondary endpoints included changes in liver histology and development of liver-related outcomes.

RESULTS

We found no significant difference in ΔHVPG between the 2 mg/kg belapectin group and placebo group (-0.28 mm HG vs 0.10 mm HG, P = 1.0) or between the 8 mg/kg belapectin and placebo group (-0.25 mm HG vs 0.10 mm HG, P = 1.0). Belapectin had no significant effect on fibrosis or nonalcoholic fatty liver disease activity score, and liver-related outcomes did not differ significantly among groups. In an analysis of a subgroup of patients without esophageal varices at baseline (n = 81), 2 mg/kg belapectin was associated with a reduction in HVPG at 52 weeks compared with baseline (P = .02) and reduced development of new varices (P = .03). Belapectin (2 mg/kg) was well tolerated and produced no safety signals.

CONCLUSIONS

In a phase 2b study of 162 patients with NASH, cirrhosis, and portal hypertension, 1 year of biweekly infusion of belapectin was safe but not associated with significant reduction in HVPG or fibrosis compared with placebo. However, in a subgroup analysis of patients without esophageal varices, 2 mg/kg belapectin did reduce HVPG and development of varices. ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT02462967.

Aggressive utilization of liver allografts: Improved outcomes over time

BACKGROUND

Aggressive acceptance of liver allografts has driven utilization of marginal allografts. Our aim was to assess the impact of the aggressive phenotype on transplant center outcomes over time.

METHODS

We used a cohort of 148 361 candidates from the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network for liver transplantation between 2002 and 2016 in 134 centers. Using the Discard Risk Index, we designated high probability discard allografts by the top 10th percentile for likelihood of discard. Aggressive phenotype was defined by usage of high probability discard (HPD) allografts (top 10th percentile). Our analysis of survival on waitlist and graft survival after transplantation included a comprehensive list of center level covariates across three equal time periods (2002-2006, 2007-2011, and 2012-2016).

RESULTS

After adjusting for recipient and center-level factors, aggressive centers had improving graft survival over time. Aggressive vs non-aggressive centers: 2002-2006 HR 1.12 (1.05-1.19), 2007-2011 HR 1.13 (1.05-1.22), 2012-2016 HR 0.99 (0.89-1.10). Aggressive centers had improved waitlist survival compared with non-aggressive centers after adjusting for allograft disparity.

CONCLUSIONS

Aggressive phenotype had a positive impact on waitlist survival, and graft survival in aggressive centers have improved to benchmark levels over time. These findings serve as justification for aggressive utilization of allografts.

Efficacy and Safety of Ombitasvir/Paritaprevir/Ritonavir in Patients With Hepatitis C Virus Genotype 1 or 4 Infection and Advanced Kidney Disease

Introduction

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is common in patients with end-stage renal disease. We investigated the safety and efficacy of ombitasvir (OBV)/paritaprevir (PTV)/ritonavir (r) ± dasabuvir (DSV) ± ribavirin (RBV) in 2 phase 3, open-label, multicenter studies in patients with stage 4 or 5 chronic kidney disease (CKD).

Methods

RUBY-I, Cohort 2 enrolled treatment-naïve or -experienced patients with HCV genotype (GT) 1a or 1b infection, with or without cirrhosis. Patients received 12 weeks (24 weeks for GT1a patients with cirrhosis) of OBV/PTV/r + DSV; all GT1a patients received RBV. RUBY-II enrolled treatment-naïve patients with GT1a or GT4 infection without cirrhosis. All patients received 12 weeks of RBV-free treatment: OBV/PTV/r + DSV for GT1a-infected patients; OBV/PTV/r for GT4-infected patients. The primary endpoint was sustained virologic response at posttreatment week 12 (SVR12).

Results

RUBY-I, Cohort 2 and RUBY-II enrolled 66 patients, including 50 (76%) on dialysis; 15 (23%) had compensated cirrhosis. Overall, the SVR12 rate was 95% (63/66); 1 patient had virologic failure. There were 3 discontinuations due to adverse events. Seventy-three percent (27/37) of patients receiving RBV had adverse events leading to RBV dose modification. The RBV-free RUBY-II study had no hemoglobin-associated adverse events.

Conclusion

Treatment with OBV/PTV/r ± DSV ± RBV was well tolerated and patients with HCV GT1 or 4 infection and stage 4 or 5 CKD had high SVR12 rates, including patients with compensated cirrhosis and/or prior treatment experience.

The safety and efficacy of elbasvir and grazoprevir in participants with hepatitis C virus genotype 1b infection

BACKGROUND

Genotype 1b (GT1b) is the most common subtype of the hepatitis C virus (HCV). We present an integrated analysis of 1070 participants with HCV GT1b infection from 30 countries who received elbasvir/grazoprevir for 12 weeks.

METHODS

This is a retrospective analysis of data from participants with chronic HCV GT1b infection enrolled in 11 phase II/III clinical trials. All participants received elbasvir 50 mg plus grazoprevir 100 mg once daily for 12 weeks. The primary end point of all studies was sustained virologic response 12 weeks after completion of therapy (SVR12, HCV RNA < 15 IU/ml).

RESULTS

SVR12 was 97.2% (1040/1070). Of the 30 participants who failed to attain SVR12, 15 relapsed and 15 had nonvirologic failure. Among participant subgroups, SVR12 was high in those with compensated cirrhosis (188/189, 99.5%), HIV co-infection (51/54, 94.4%), and baseline viral load > 800,000 IU/ml (705/728, 96.8%). Resistance-associated substitutions (RASs) at NS5A positions 28, 30, 31, or 93 were present in 21.6% of participants at baseline. SVR12 was 99.6% (820/823) in participants without baseline NS5A RASs and 94.7% (215/227) in those with baseline NS5A RASs. Serious adverse events occurred in 3.2% (34/1070) of participants, nine of which occurred after study medication was completed.

CONCLUSIONS

Elbasvir/grazoprevir for 12 weeks represents an effective treatment option for participants with HCV GT1b infection. SVR12 was high in all participant subgroups, including those with compensated cirrhosis, HIV co-infection, and high baseline viral load. CLINICALTRIALS.

GOV IDENTIFIERS

The trials discussed in this paper were registered with Clinicaltrial.gov as the following: NCT02092350 (C-SURFER), NCT02105662 (C-EDGE Co-Infection), NCT02105467 (C-EDGE treatment-naive), NCT02105701 (C-EDGE treatment-experienced), NCT01717326 (C-WORTHy), NCT02251990 (C-CORAL), NCT02105688 (C-EDGE COSTAR), NCT02252016 (C-EDGE IBLD), NCT02115321 (C-SALT), NCT02203149 (Japan phase 2/3 study), NCT02358044 (C-EDGE Head-2-Head).

Glecaprevir-Pibrentasvir for 8 or 12 Weeks in HCV Genotype 1 or 3 Infection

BACKGROUND

Glecaprevir and pibrentasvir are direct-acting antiviral agents with pangenotypic activity and a high barrier to resistance. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of 8-week and 12-week courses of treatment with 300 mg of glecaprevir plus 120 mg of pibrentasvir in patients without cirrhosis who had hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 1 or 3 infection.

METHODS

We conducted two phase 3, randomized, open-label, multicenter trials. Patients with genotype 1 infection were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive once-daily glecaprevir-pibrentasvir for either 8 or 12 weeks. Patients with genotype 3 infection were randomly assigned in a 2:1 ratio to receive 12 weeks of treatment with either glecaprevir-pibrentasvir or sofosbuvir-daclatasvir. Additional patients with genotype 3 infection were subsequently enrolled and nonrandomly assigned to receive 8 weeks of treatment with glecaprevir-pibrentasvir. The primary end point was the rate of sustained virologic response 12 weeks after the end of treatment.

RESULTS

In total, 1208 patients were treated. The rate of sustained virologic response at 12 weeks among genotype 1-infected patients was 99.1% (95% confidence interval [CI], 98 to 100) in the 8-week group and 99.7% (95% CI, 99 to 100) in the 12-week group. Genotype 3-infected patients who were treated for 12 weeks had a rate of sustained virologic response at 12 weeks of 95% (95% CI, 93 to 98; 222 of 233 patients) with glecaprevir-pibrentasvir and 97% (95% CI, 93 to 99.9; 111 of 115) with sofosbuvir-daclatasvir; 8 weeks of treatment with glecaprevir-pibrentasvir yielded a rate of 95% (95% CI, 91 to 98; 149 of 157 patients). Adverse events led to discontinuation of treatment in no more than 1% of patients in any treatment group.

CONCLUSIONS

Once-daily treatment with glecaprevir-pibrentasvir for either 8 weeks or 12 weeks achieved high rates of sustained virologic response among patients with HCV genotype 1 or 3 infection who did not have cirrhosis. (Funded by AbbVie; ENDURANCE-1 and ENDURANCE-3 ClinicalTrials.gov numbers, NCT02604017 and NCT02640157 .).

Elafibranor, an Agonist of the Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor-α and -δ, Induces Resolution of Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis Without Fibrosis Worsening

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Elafibranor is an agonist of the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-α and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-δ. Elafibranor improves insulin sensitivity, glucose homeostasis, and lipid metabolism and reduces inflammation. We assessed the safety and efficacy of elafibranor in an international, randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled trial of patients with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH).

METHODS

Patients with NASH without cirrhosis were randomly assigned to groups given elafibranor 80 mg (n = 93), elafibranor 120 mg (n = 91), or placebo (n = 92) each day for 52 weeks at sites in Europe and the United States. Clinical and laboratory evaluations were performed every 2 months during this 1-year period. Liver biopsies were then collected and patients were assessed 3 months later. The primary outcome was resolution of NASH without fibrosis worsening, using protocol-defined and modified definitions. Data from the groups given the different doses of elafibranor were compared with those from the placebo group using step-down logistic regression, adjusting for baseline nonalcoholic fatty liver disease activity score.

RESULTS

In intention-to-treat analysis, there was no significant difference between the elafibranor and placebo groups in the protocol-defined primary outcome. However, NASH resolved without fibrosis worsening in a higher proportion of patients in the 120-mg elafibranor group vs the placebo group (19% vs 12%; odds ratio = 2.31; 95% confidence interval: 1.02-5.24; P = .045), based on a post-hoc analysis for the modified definition. In post-hoc analyses of patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease activity score ≥4 (n = 234), elafibranor 120 mg resolved NASH in larger proportions of patients than placebo based on the protocol definition (20% vs 11%; odds ratio = 3.16; 95% confidence interval: 1.22-8.13; P = .018) and the modified definitions (19% vs 9%; odds ratio = 3.52; 95% confidence interval: 1.32-9.40; P = .013). Patients with NASH resolution after receiving elafibranor 120 mg had reduced liver fibrosis stages compared with those without NASH resolution (mean reduction of 0.65 ± 0.61 in responders for the primary outcome vs an increase of 0.10 ± 0.98 in nonresponders; P < .001). Liver enzymes, lipids, glucose profiles, and markers of systemic inflammation were significantly reduced in the elafibranor 120-mg group vs the placebo group. Elafibranor was well tolerated and did not cause weight gain or cardiac events, but did produce a mild, reversible increase in serum creatinine (effect size vs placebo: increase of 4.31 ± 1.19 μmol/L; P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

A post-hoc analysis of data from trial of patients with NASH showed that elafibranor (120 mg/d for 1 year) resolved NASH without fibrosis worsening, based on a modified definition, in the intention-to-treat analysis and in patients with moderate or severe NASH. However, the predefined end point was not met in the intention to treat population. Elafibranor was well tolerated and improved patients' cardiometabolic risk profile. ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT01694849.

Daclatasvir in combination with asunaprevir and beclabuvir for hepatitis C virus genotype 1 infection with compensated cirrhosis

IMPORTANCE

Effective and well-tolerated, interferon-free regimens are needed for treatment of patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection and cirrhosis.

OBJECTIVE

All-oral therapy with daclatasvir (nonstructural protein 5A [NS5A] inhibitor), asunaprevir (NS3 protease inhibitor), and beclabuvir (nonnucleoside NS5B inhibitor), with or without ribavirin, was evaluated in patients with HCV genotype 1 infection and compensated cirrhosis.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

The UNITY-2 study was conducted between December 2013 and October 2014 at 49 outpatient sites in the United States, Canada, France, and Australia. Patients were treated for 12 weeks, with 24 weeks of follow-up after completion of treatment. Adult patients with cirrhosis were enrolled in 2 cohorts: HCV treatment-naive or HCV treatment-experienced. Statistical analyses were based on historical controls; there were no internal controls.

INTERVENTIONS

All patients received twice-daily treatment with the fixed-dose combination of daclatasvir (30 mg), asunaprevir (200 mg), and beclabuvir (75 mg). In addition, patients within each cohort were stratified according to HCV genotype 1 subtype (1a or 1b) and randomly assigned (1:1) to receive double-blinded weight-based ribavirin (1000-1200 mg/d) or matching placebo.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Sustained virologic response at posttreatment week 12 (SVR12).

RESULTS

One hundred twelve patients in the treatment-naive group and 90 patients in the treatment-experienced group were treated and included in the analysis. Enrolled patients were 88% white with a median age of 58 years (treatment-naive group) or 60 years (treatment-experienced group); 74% had genotype 1a infection. SVR12 rates were 98% (97.5% CI, 88.9%-100%) for patients in the treatment-naive group and 93% (97.5% CI, 85.0%-100.0%) for those in the treatment-experienced group when ribavirin was included in the regimen. With the fixed-dose combination alone, response rates were 93% (97.5% CI, 85.4%-100.0%) for patients in the treatment-naive group and 87% (97.5% CI, 75.3%-98.0%) for those in the treatment-experienced group. Three serious adverse events were considered to be treatment related and there were 4 adverse event-related discontinuations. Treatment-emergent grade 3 or 4 alanine aminotransferase elevations were observed in 4 patients, of which 1 had concomitant total bilirubin elevation.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this open-label uncontrolled study, patients with chronic HCV genotype 1 infection and cirrhosis who received a 12-week oral fixed-dose regimen of daclatasvir, asunaprevir, and beclabuvir, with or without ribavirin, achieved high rates of SVR12.

PROPEL: a randomized trial of mericitabine plus peginterferon alpha-2a/ribavirin therapy in treatment-naïve HCV genotype 1/4 patients

Mericitabine is a nucleoside analog polymerase inhibitor of hepatitis C virus (HCV). Treatment-naïve HCV genotype 1 or 4 patients were randomized to double-blind treatment with oral mericitabine at a dosage of 500 mg twice-daily (BID) for 12 weeks (A), 1,000 mg BID for 8 (B) or 12 weeks (C and D), or placebo BID for 12 weeks (E). All patients received pegylated interferon alpha-2a (Peg-IFNα-2a; 40 kD)/ribavirin (RBV) at standard doses for 24 or 48 weeks during and after mericitabine/placebo therapy. Patients in arms A-C who maintained a virologic response (VR) (HCV RNA <15 IU/mL) from weeks 4 to 22 stopped all treatment at week 24; all other patients (arms A-E) continued Peg-IFNα-2a/RBV to complete 48 weeks. The primary outcome was sustained VR (SVR) (HCV RNA <15 IU/mL after 24 weeks of untreated follow-up; SVR-24). VR rates were higher in arms A-D than in arm E at weeks 4 and 12 overall, in patients with and without cirrhosis and in patients with CC and non-CC IL28B genotypes. However, the overall SVR-24 rate in arms D (50.6%) and E (placebo, 51.2%) was similar and those in the response-guided therapy arms A, B, and C were lower (48.8%, 42.0%, and 32.9%, respectively). No viral breakthrough or mericitabine-resistance mutations (S282T) were observed during mericitabine therapy.

CONCLUSION

Treatment with mericitabine plus Peg-IFNα-2a/RBV for 8 or 12 weeks provided potent suppression of HCV RNA, was well tolerated, and did not select resistant variants, but did not increase SVR rates, compared to placebo. IFN-free and IFN-containing trials of mericitabine of longer treatment duration are ongoing.

Effect of national recommendations on hepatitis B virus screening in a large U.S. cancer center

175

Background: National organizations recommend screening for hepatitis B virus (HBV) before chemotherapy but differ regarding which patients should be screened. We aimed to determine changes in screening rates at a cancer center after national recommendations were published between 2008 and 2010. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of HBV screening in cancer patients registered 1/2004 through 4/2011. Screening was defined as HBsAg and anti-HBc tests ordered around initial chemotherapy. We compared screening rates for 3 periods: before publication recommendations, during the period of publication of CDC, NCCN, AASLD, IOM, and ASCO recommendations, and after publication of recommendations. Logistic regression models were used to identify predictors of screening. Results: Of 139,981 new patients, 18,688 received chemotherapy, and 3,020 (16.2%) were screened. HBV screening rates increased over the 3 periods (14.8%, 18.2%, 19.9%; p<0.0001), but <19% of patients with HBV risk factors were screened. Among patients with hematologic malignancies, over 66% were screened during the entire study period, and odds of screening nearly doubled after publication of recommendations (p<0.0001). Less than 4% of patients with solid tumors were screened during the entire study period despite 70% increase in odds of screening after recommendations (p=0.003). Other predictors of screening included younger age, planned rituximab therapy, and known risk factors for HBV infection. Conclusions: HBV screening increased after publication of national recommendations, yet most patients with solid tumors or HBV risk factors remained unscreened. Efforts are needed to increase awareness of the importance of HBV screening prior to chemotherapy and antiviral prophylaxis to prevent HBV reactivation.

Trends in hepatitis B virus screening in a large U.S. cancer center

e19631

Background: In the past 5 years, national hepatitis B virus (HBV) screening recommendations differed with respect to populations that should be screened to prevent reactivation, which may occur in patients with hematologic or solid malignancies. Previous studies showed that up to 60% of oncologists are not screening. We sought to compare the HBV screening patterns over time in a large US cancer center in relationship to the 2010 ASCO Provisional Clinical Opinion (PCO) which includes recommendations to screen patients with hematologic malignancies prior to receipt of certain cancer therapies. Methods: Retrospective cohort study of patients with newly diagnosed cancer registered at MD Anderson (1/04 - 4/11) who received chemotherapy. Screening was defined as testing for hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) and antibody to hepatitis B core antigen (anti-HBc) before chemotherapy. We compared screening rates among patients with hematologic malignancies vs. solid tumors. Using Chi-square tests, we compared screening rates before and after the PCO. A generalized linear regression model was used to detect changes in the rates of HBV screening over time for patients based on cancer type. Results: During our study period, 141,877 patients were registered, and 13% (n=18,877) received chemotherapy. Of these, 18% (n=3475) had HBV screening: 1% (n=42) were HBsAg+/anti-HBc+, while 7% (n=242) were HBsAg-/anti-HBc+. The overall screening rate significantly increased from 18% before the PCO to 23% after the PCO (p<0.01). After the PCO, the screening rate among patients with hematologic malignancies increased from 69% to 79% (p<0.01), and among patients with solid tumors from 3.8% to 5% (p=0.05). Overall, the rate of increase of HBV screening among patients with hematologic malignancies was higher than for patients with solid tumors (p<0.01). Conclusions: Rates of HBV screening increased after the PCO, although the rate of increase was greater among patients with hematologic malignancies than solid tumors. Because reactivation is an important and preventable cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with either hematologic or solid malignancies, further efforts are needed to screen patients at risk by identifying predictors of reactivation of HBV infection.

Biochemical and immunologic effects of rituximab in patients with primary biliary cirrhosis and an incomplete response to ursodeoxycholic acid

The aim of this study was to determine the safety and potential efficacy of B-cell depletion with the anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody rituximab in patients with primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC) and an incomplete response to ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA). This open-label study enrolled six patients with PBC and incomplete responses to UDCA to be treated with 2 doses of 1000 mg rituximab separated by 2 weeks and followed for 52 weeks. The primary endpoints were safety and changes in B-cell function. Two patients received only 1 dose of rituximab, one due to activation of latent varicella and the other due to a viral upper respiratory infection. Serum levels of total IgG, IgM, and IgA as well as anti-mitochondrial autoantibodies (AMAs) IgA and IgM decreased significantly from baseline by 16 weeks and returned to baseline levels by 36 weeks. Stimulation of B cells with CpG produced significantly less IgM at 52 weeks after treatment compared with B cells at baseline. In addition, transient decreases in memory B-cell and T-cell frequencies and an increase in CD25(high) CD4(+) T cells were observed after treatment. These changes were associated with significant increases in mRNA levels of FoxP3 and transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) and a decrease in tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) in CD4(+) T cells. Notably, serum alkaline phosphatase levels were significantly reduced up to 36 weeks following rituximab treatment.

CONCLUSION

These data suggest that depletion of B cells influences the induction, maintenance, and activation of both B and T cells and provides a potential mechanism for treatment of patients with PBC with an incomplete response to UDCA.

Predictors of hepatitis B screening among patients with cancer

180

Background: Patients with hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection are at risk of reactivation after chemotherapy. It is unclear whether all patients or only those with certain risk factors should be screened for HBV before chemotherapy. The purpose of our study was to determine the clinical predictors of HBV screening in a single institution.

Methods: In this retrospective, cross-sectional study, we evaluated new patients who received chemotherapy between 1/1/04 and 9/30/07. We collected data on patients' demographics, types of cancer and chemotherapy, and HBV risk factors such as a previous ICD-9 code for hepatitis C or other liver conditions. We searched for HBV screening as defined by an HBsAg or anti-HBc test ordered prior to chemotherapy. In univariate analyses, we examined the association between each of the patient-related variables and HBV screening. We then determined predictors of HBV screening in a multivariable logistic regression model.

Results: We found 10,729 patients who had chemotherapy during the study period. Overall, 16.7% had HBV screening. All of the following predictors in the univariate analysis were significant for HBV screening at the p<0.01 level: age, gender, ethnicity, U.S. residence, cancer type, chemotherapy type, and having a HBV risk factor. In multivariable logistic regression examining predictors for screening using HBsAg, we found that Asian ethnicity (OR 1.75; 1.16-2.66), hematologic malignancies (OR 22.65; 19.3-26.31), and the receipt of rituxamab (OR 3.71; 3.03-4.48) were significant predictors at the p<0.01 level. Women were less likely to be screened than men (OR 0.68; 0.59-0.78). We repeated the analyses using the anti-HBc screening test, and the results were similar. Overall, 1.5% of the screened patients had a positive HBV test.

Conclusions: We found that ethnicity, cancer types, and chemotherapy drugs predict physician-driven HBV screening. Future research is needed to study the predictors of a positive HBV screening test and reactivation of HBV after chemotherapy.

[Table: see text]

Successful liver transplantation following medical management of portopulmonary hypertension: a single-center series

Severe portopulmonary hypertension (POPH) is an absolute contraindication to orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). Vasodilators have been used, but the safety of subsequent transplantation and the reversibility of pulmonary hypertension after transplantation are uncertain. This study examined the feasibility and post-transplant effects of liver transplantation following medical control of POPH. Eight consecutive patients (three females and five males, ages 39-51) with POPH as their only contraindication to transplantation were treated with continuous intravenous epoprostenol. Liver transplantation was considered if the mean pulmonary artery pressure (PAM) was lowered to <35 mmHg. Epoprostenol 2-8 ng/kg/min successfully improved hemodynamics in seven of eight patients, usually within 6.5 months of initiating therapy. PAM declined from an average of 43-33 mmHg (p=0.03); mean pulmonary vascular resistance declined from 410 to 192 dyn s cm-5 (p=0.01) and cardiac output increased from 6.6 to 10 L/min (p=0.02). Six of the seven responders were actively listed for liver transplantation. Two died on the waiting list; the remaining four were transplanted and remain alive and well 9-18 months post-OLT-two without vasodilators, and two on oral medication. We conclude that pulmonary vasodilators permit safe liver transplantation in some cases, and that POPH may be reversible after transplantation.

Treatment challenges and investigational opportunities in autoimmune hepatitis

New drugs and advances in molecular biology afford opportunities to upgrade the treatment of autoimmune hepatitis. The aims of this study were to define treatment problems, identify possible solutions, and stimulate investigations to improve patient care. A clinical subcommittee of the International Autoimmune Hepatitis Group reviewed current management difficulties and proposed corrective actions. The assessment of new front-line and salvage therapies for adults and children were given top priority. Cyclosporine and mycophenolate mofetil were endorsed as drugs worthy of rigorous study in severe disease, and budesonide was endorsed for study as front-line therapy in mild disease. Diagnostic criteria and treatment regimens for children required codification, and pharmacokinetic studies were encouraged to develop optimal dosing schedules based on therapeutic ranges. Collaborative efforts were proposed to help understand racial, geographical, and genetic factors affecting outcome and to establish definitions and therapies for variant syndromes and graft dysfunction after transplantation. The development of experimental animal models was deemed essential for the study of site-specific molecular interventions, and gene therapy was endorsed as a means of bolstering reparative processes. In conclusion, evolving pharmacological and technical advances promise to improve the treatment of autoimmune hepatitis, and investigations of these advances are timely, feasible, and necessary.

Hepatitis C therapy with long term remission after renal transplantation

Hepatitis C virus infection (HCV) is common in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) and long observation periods have shown the detrimental effect of HCV infection on patient and graft survival after renal transplantation. At present, interferon is the most important agent for the treatment of hepatitis C in ESRD; however, limited information exists concerning the long-term response of patients who undergo renal transplantation after successful antiviral therapy. We describe the evolution of HCV infection in a dialysis patient with hepatitis C who was successfully treated with interferon alpha and then underwent renal transplantation. He received aggressive immunosuppression during the induction phase and for allograft rejection; however, regular screening showed complete absence of biochemical and virological relapse of HCV over a 6-year post-transplantation period. We conclude that interferon can offer excellent response in selected dialysis patients with hepatitis C. Alternative strategies with newer antiviral agents are currently under active investigation.

Survey results of transplant patients' attitudes on xenografting

For centuries, many cultures have described mythical creatures with bodies that combined human and animal features, often the result of violating taboos. This study attempted to investigate the beliefs of transplant patients about xenografting. A survey was given to 100 patients ranging in age from 17 to 74 years old, with 65 men and 35 women, including 72 whites, 18 Hispanics, 5 African Americans, and 4 Asian Americans. The subjects included liver, heart, kidney, lung, and multi-organ transplant patients. The patients were not aware of plans for xenografting at the center under study. Eighty patients agreed with xenografting in an emergency situation. Ten subjects replied, "under no circumstances." Ninety percent believed animal research has advanced medical science. In descending order, the patients preferred human (96%), monkey (44%), mechanical (43%), pig (42%), or dog (34%) organs. Twenty-four patients thought a xenograft would change their appearance, personality, or eating or sexual habits. Twenty patients believed animals have souls. The patients also documented any ethical concerns about xenografting.

The first Flaviviridae symposium

The first annual Flaviviridae Symposium, sponsored by ICN Pharmaceuticals Inc., was held in Lyon, France, on 9 October, 1997, to communicate current understanding on the Flaviviridae. This multidisciplinary symposium attracted over 300 international delegates and presentations covered virology, viral pathogenesis, potential therapies and strategies for vaccine development. The symposium reviewed the research area that may lead to the discovery and design of human and veterinary medicines against members of this virus family.

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt: efficacy for the treatment of portal hypertension and impact on liver transplantation

Variceal bleeding (VB) and ascites refractory to diuretics (RA) represent a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with portal hypertension. Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts (TIPS) have been used effectively in patients with these complications, especially those individuals awaiting orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). From April 1992 to July 1995, 41 adult patients underwent an attempt at TIPS placement for refractory VB or ascites at Cedars-Sinai Medical Center. Technical success was achieved in 37 of 41 cases (90.3%) with only two technical complications. Immediate control of hemorrhage and significant improvement of ascites was obtained in 91.9% and 83.5% of the patients, respectively. Six patients (16.2%) died within a week of TIPS placement due to uncontrollable ascites and multiorgan failure. Four of 31 patients (12.9%) developed mild to moderate grades of hepatic encephalopathy that was controlled with lactulose. Rebleeding from recurrent portal hypertension was noted in 5 of 31 cases (16.1%). Shunt stenosis or occlusion was seen in 7 of 31 cases (22.6%) at an average of 6.3 months following TIPS placement. Six patients underwent OLT within an average of 87 days after TIPS. These results indicate that TIPS appears to be an effective method for treatment of refractory VB and RA, especially for patients who are poor candidates for a surgical shunt or awaiting OLT. However, TIPS may not be considered a definitive solution for all patients with portal hypertension because of its current rate of shunt occlusion or stenosis.

Clearance of chronic hepatitis B virus infection in young children after alpha interferon treatment

Nine children aged 18 months to 17 years (mean 5.7 years) with chronic hepatitis b virus infection and chronic active hepatitis were treated with 5 to 6 million units/m2 of body surface area of interferon -alpha 2b administered subcutaneously three times per week for 4 months (n = 1) or 6 months (n = 8). At 12 months after the start of therapy, six children less than 3 years of age responded to the treatment (three completely and three partially), whereas only one of three children older than 7 years of age responded. We conclude that IFN treatment may be effective in children with chronic HBV infection, especially when administered while they are young.

Portal vein patency in candidates for liver transplantation: MR angiographic analysis

PURPOSE

To assess the accuracy of magnetic resonance (MR) angiography for evaluating portal vein patency in candidates for liver transplantation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

MR angiography was performed in the main portal vein and proximal confluence of the portal vein in 102 candidates for liver transplantation (64 male patients and 38 female patients aged 8 months to 74 years; mean age, 47 years). The MR angiographic results were compared with the surgical and histologic findings in the explanted liver and excised main portal vein.

RESULTS

MR angiography depicted 10 portal vein clots, all of which were confirmed at transplantation. Ninety-two portal veins were patent at MR angiography, a finding that was confirmed at transplantation. One tiny chronic clot in a small, intrahepatic branch of the portal vein was not seen at MR angiography or transplantation. It was identified at histologic analysis of the explanted liver.

CONCLUSION

MR angiography is accurate in the evaluation of portal vein patency.