Fatty acid binding protein 5 inhibition attenuates pronociceptive cytokine/chemokine expression and suppresses osteoarthritis pain: A comparative human and rat study

OBJECTIVE

Osteoarthritis (OA) is often accompanied by debilitating pain that is refractory to available analgesics due in part to the complexity of signaling molecules that drive OA pain and our inability to target these in parallel. Fatty acid binding protein 5 (FABP5) is a lipid chaperone that regulates inflammatory pain; however, its contribution to OA pain has not been characterized.

DESIGN

This combined clinical and pre-clinical study utilized synovial tissues obtained from subjects with end-stage OA and rats with monoiodoacetate-induced OA. Cytokine and chemokine release from human synovia incubated with a selective FABP5 inhibitor was profiled with cytokine arrays and ELISA. Immunohistochemical analyses were conducted for FABP5 in human and rat synovium. The efficacy of FABP5 inhibitors on pain was assessed in OA rats using incapacitance as an outcome. RNA-seq was then performed to characterize the transcriptomic landscape of synovial gene expression in OA rats treated with FABP5 inhibitor or vehicle.

RESULTS

FABP5 was expressed in human synovium and FABP5 inhibition reduced the secretion of pronociceptive cytokines (interleukin-6 [IL6], IL8) and chemokines (CCL2, CXCL1). In rats, FABP5 was upregulated in the OA synovium and its inhibition alleviated incapacitance. The transcriptome of the rat OA synovium exhibited >6000 differentially expressed genes, including the upregulation of numerous pronociceptive cytokines and chemokines. FABP5 inhibition blunted the upregulation of the majority of these pronociceptive mediators.

CONCLUSIONS

FABP5 is expressed in the OA synovium and its inhibition suppresses pronociceptive signaling and pain, indicating that FABP5 inhibitors may constitute a novel class of analgesics to treat OA.

On time-limited writing therapy

A study was made of 6 undergraduate men and 11 women who volunteered to writing therapy on a time-limited basis, instead of oral, face-to-face therapy, for which they were paid. Pre- and posttest evaluations included the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory, the Edwards Personal Preference Schedule, self-ratings, and ratings of the writing therapy protocols by judges. Results showed reliable gains on the former inventory in terms of less “serious” pathology and more social assertiveness, on the latter test results showed more posttesting interest in achievement, change, heterosexual relationships and more assertive tendencies. Protocol evaluations by the judges indicated client gains in confidence and in problem-solving efforts; clients' self-ratings showed favorable reactions to therapy. The economy of writing as a therapeutic method was demonstrated in terms of words written each session by clients and therapists.