1
|
Cohen JT. It Is Time to Reconsider the 3% Discount Rate. Value Health 2024; 27:578-584. [PMID: 38462224 DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2024.03.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2023] [Revised: 02/09/2024] [Accepted: 03/01/2024] [Indexed: 03/12/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Health technology assessment (HTA) guidance often recommends a 3% real annual discount rate, the appropriateness of which has received limited attention. This article seeks to identify an appropriate rate for high-income countries because it can influence projected cost-effectiveness and hence resource allocation recommendations. METHODS The author conducted 2 Pubmed.gov searches. The first sought articles on the theory for selecting a rate. The second sought HTA guidance documents. RESULTS The first search yielded 21 articles describing 2 approaches. The "Ramsey Equation" sums contributions by 4 factors: pure time preference, catastrophic risk, wealth effect, and macroeconomic risk. The first 3 factors increase the discount rate because they indicate future impacts are less important, whereas the last, suggesting greater future need, decreases the discount rate. A fifth factor-project-specific risk-increases the discount rate but does not appear in the Ramsey Equation. Market interest rates represent a second approach for identifying a discount rate because they represent competing investment returns and hence opportunity costs. The second search identified HTA guidelines for 32 high-income countries. Twenty-two provide no explicit rationale for their recommended rates, 8 appeal to market interest rates, 3 to consistency, and 3 to Ramsey Equation factors. CONCLUSIONS Declining consumption growth and real interest rates imply HTA guidance should reduce recommended discount rates to 1.5 to 2+%. This change will improve projected cost-effectiveness for therapies with long-term benefits and increase the impact of accounting for long-term drug price dynamics, including reduced prices attending loss of market exclusivity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joshua T Cohen
- Deputy Director, Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health, Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Olchanski N, Zhu Y, Liang L, Cohen JT, Faul JD, Fillit HM, Freund KM, Lin PJ. Racial and ethnic differences in disease course Medicare expenditures for beneficiaries with dementia. J Am Geriatr Soc 2024; 72:1223-1233. [PMID: 38504583 PMCID: PMC11018481 DOI: 10.1111/jgs.18822] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2023] [Revised: 01/16/2024] [Accepted: 01/28/2024] [Indexed: 03/21/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Research on racial and ethnic disparities in costs of care during the course of dementia is sparse. We analyzed Medicare expenditures for beneficiaries with dementia to identify when during the course of care costs are the highest and whether they differ by race and ethnicity. METHODS We analyzed data from the 2000-2016 Health and Retirement Study (HRS) linked with corresponding Medicare claims to estimate total Medicare expenditures for four phases: (1) the year before a dementia diagnosis, (2) the first year following a dementia diagnosis, (3) ongoing care for dementia after the first year, and (4) the last year of life. We estimated each patient's phase-specific and disease course Medicare expenditures by using a race-specific survival model and monthly expenditures adjusted for patient characteristics. We investigated healthcare utilization by service type across races/ethnicities and phases of care. RESULTS Adjusted mean total Medicare expenditures for non-Hispanic (NH) Black ($165,730) and Hispanic beneficiaries with dementia ($160,442) exceeded corresponding expenditures for NH Whites ($136,326). In the year preceding and immediately following initial dementia diagnosis, mean Medicare expenditures for NH Blacks ($26,337 and $20,429) exceeded expenditures for Hispanics and NH Whites ($21,399-23,176 and 17,182-18,244). The last year of life was responsible for the greatest cost contribution: $51,294 (NH Blacks), $47,469 (Hispanics), and $39,499 (NH Whites). These differences were driven by greater use of high-cost services (e.g., emergency department, inpatient and intensive care), especially during the last year of life. CONCLUSIONS NH Black and Hispanic beneficiaries with dementia had higher disease course Medicare expenditures than NH Whites. Expenditures were highest for NH Black beneficiaries in every phase of care. Further research should address mechanisms of such disparities and identify methods to improve communication, shared decision-making, and access to appropriate services for all populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natalia Olchanski
- Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health, Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Medicine, Tufts Medical Center, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Yingying Zhu
- Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health, Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Lichen Liang
- Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health, Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Joshua T Cohen
- Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health, Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Medicine, Tufts Medical Center, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Jessica D Faul
- Survey Research Center, Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Howard M Fillit
- Alzheimer's Drug Discovery Foundation, New York, New York, USA
| | - Karen M Freund
- Department of Medicine, Tufts Medical Center, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Pei-Jung Lin
- Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health, Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Medicine, Tufts Medical Center, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Cohen JT, Miner TJ. Additional resources are required in the care of complex palliative patients. Ann Palliat Med 2023; 12:872-874. [PMID: 37303215 DOI: 10.21037/apm-23-281] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2023] [Accepted: 05/19/2023] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Joshua T Cohen
- Department of Surgery, Rhode Island Hospital, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Thomas J Miner
- Department of Surgery, Rhode Island Hospital, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patient selection for palliative surgery is complex, and appropriate outcomes measures are incompletely defined. We explored the usefulness of a specific outcomes measure "was it worth it" in patients after palliative-intent operations for advanced malignancy. STUDY DESIGN A retrospective review of a comprehensive longitudinal palliative surgery database was performed at an academic tertiary care center. All patients who underwent palliative-intent operation for advanced cancer from 2003 to 2022 were included. Patient satisfaction ("was it worth it") was reported within 30 days of operation after palliative-intent surgery. RESULTS A total of 180 patients were identified, and 81.7% self-reported that their palliative surgery was "worth it." Patients who reported that their surgery was "not worth it" were significantly older and were more likely to have recurrent symptoms and to need reoperation. There was no significant difference in overall, recurrence-free, and reoperation-free survival for patients when comparing "worth it" with "not worth it." Initial symptom improvement was not significantly different between groups. Age older than 65 years (hazard ratio 0.25, 95% CI 0.07 to 0.80, p = 0.03), family engagement (hazard ratio 6.71, 95% CI 1.49 to 31.8, p = 0.01), and need for reoperation (hazard ratio 0.042, 95% CI 0.01 to 0.16, p < 0.0001) were all independently associated with patients reporting that their operation was "worth it." CONCLUSIONS Here we demonstrate that simply asking a patient "was it worth it" after a palliative-intent operation identifies a distinct cohort of patients that traditional outcomes measures fail to distinguish. Family engagement and durability of an intervention are critical factors in determining patient satisfaction after palliative intervention. These data highlight the need for highly individualized care with special attention paid to patients self-reporting that their operation was "not worth it."
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joshua T Cohen
- From the Department of Surgery, Rhode Island Hospital, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Health technology assessment (HTA) organizations vary in terms of how they conduct assessments. We assess whether and to what extent HTA bodies have adopted societal and novel elements of value in their economic evaluations. METHODS After categorizing "societal" and "novel" elements of value, we reviewed fifty-three HTA guidelines. We collected data on whether each guideline mentioned each societal or novel element of value, and if so, whether the guideline recommended the element's inclusion in the base case, sensitivity analysis, or qualitative discussion in the HTA. RESULTS The HTA guidelines mention on average 5.9 of the twenty-one societal and novel value elements we identified (range 0-16), including 2.3 of the ten societal elements and 3.3 of the eleven novel value elements. Only four value elements (productivity, family spillover, equity, and transportation) appear in over half of the HTA guidelines, whereas thirteen value elements are mentioned in fewer than one-sixth of the guidelines, and two elements receive no mention. Most guidelines do not recommend value element inclusion in the base case, sensitivity analysis, or qualitative discussion in the HTA. CONCLUSIONS Ideally, more HTA organizations will adopt guidelines for measuring societal and novel value elements, including analytic considerations. Importantly, simply recommending in guidelines that HTA bodies consider novel elements may not lead to their incorporation into assessments or ultimate decision making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel Milstein Breslau
- Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health, Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Joshua T Cohen
- Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health, Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jose Diaz
- Bristol-Myers Squibb Pharmaceuticals Ltd., Uxbridge, UK
| | - Bill Malcolm
- Bristol-Myers Squibb Pharmaceuticals Ltd., Uxbridge, UK
| | - Peter J Neumann
- Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health, Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Olchanski N, Daly AT, Zhu Y, Breslau R, Cohen JT, Neumann PJ, Faul JD, Fillit HM, Freund KM, Lin PJ. Alzheimer's disease medication use and adherence patterns by race and ethnicity. Alzheimers Dement 2023; 19:1184-1193. [PMID: 35939325 PMCID: PMC9905357 DOI: 10.1002/alz.12753] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2021] [Revised: 06/16/2022] [Accepted: 06/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND We examined racial and ethnic differences in medication use for a representative US population of patients with Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRD). METHODS We examined cholinesterase inhibitors and memantine initiation, non-adherence, and discontinuation by race and ethnicity, using data from the 2000-2016 Health and Retirement Study linked with Medicare and Medicaid claims. RESULTS Among newly diagnosed ADRD patients (n = 1299), 26% filled an ADRD prescription ≤90 days and 36% ≤365 days after diagnosis. Among individuals initiating ADRD-targeted treatment (n = 1343), 44% were non-adherent and 24% discontinued the medication during the year after treatment initiation. Non-Hispanic Blacks were more likely than Whites to not adhere to ADRD medication therapy (odds ratio: 1.50 [95% confidence interval: 1.07-2.09]). DISCUSSION Initiation of ADRD-targeted medications did not vary by ethnoracial group, but non-Hispanic Blacks had lower adherence than Whites. ADRD medication non-adherence and discontinuation were substantial and may relate to cost and access to care. HIGHLIGHTS Initiation of anti-dementia medications among newly diagnosed Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRD) patients was low in all ethnoracial groups. ADRD medication non-adherence and discontinuation were substantial and may relate to cost and access to care. Compared to Whites, Blacks and Hispanics had lower use, poorer treatment adherence, and more frequent discontinuation of ADRD medication, but when controlling for disease severity and socioeconomic factors, racial disparities diminish. Our findings demonstrate the importance of adjusting for socioeconomic characteristics and disease severity when studying medication use and adherence in ADRD patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natalia Olchanski
- Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health, Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, 800 Washington St, #063, Boston, MA 02111
- Department of Medicine, Tufts University School of Medicine, 145 Harrison Ave, Boston, MA 02111
| | - Allan T. Daly
- Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health, Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, 800 Washington St, #063, Boston, MA 02111
| | - Yingying Zhu
- Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health, Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, 800 Washington St, #063, Boston, MA 02111
| | - Rachel Breslau
- Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health, Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, 800 Washington St, #063, Boston, MA 02111
| | - Joshua T. Cohen
- Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health, Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, 800 Washington St, #063, Boston, MA 02111
- Department of Medicine, Tufts University School of Medicine, 145 Harrison Ave, Boston, MA 02111
| | - Peter J. Neumann
- Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health, Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, 800 Washington St, #063, Boston, MA 02111
- Department of Medicine, Tufts University School of Medicine, 145 Harrison Ave, Boston, MA 02111
| | - Jessica D. Faul
- Survey Research Center, Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan, P.O. Box 1248, Ann Arbor, MI 48106
| | - Howard M. Fillit
- Alzheimer’s Drug Discovery Foundation, 57 West 57th St, Suite 904, New York, NY 10019
| | - Karen M. Freund
- Department of Medicine, Tufts University School of Medicine, 145 Harrison Ave, Boston, MA 02111
- Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, 800 Washington St, #063, Boston, MA 02111
| | - Pei-Jung Lin
- Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health, Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, 800 Washington St, #063, Boston, MA 02111
- Department of Medicine, Tufts University School of Medicine, 145 Harrison Ave, Boston, MA 02111
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Cohen JT. The Impact on Cost-Effectiveness of Accounting for Generic Drug Pricing: Four Case Studies. Value Health 2023; 26:344-350. [PMID: 36336585 DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2022.09.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2022] [Revised: 09/07/2022] [Accepted: 09/23/2022] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Guidance on the conduct of health technology assessments rarely recommends accounting for anticipated future price declines that can follow loss of marketing exclusivity. This article explores when it is appropriate to account for generic pricing and whether it can influence cost-effectiveness estimates. METHODS This article presents 4 case studies. Case study 1 considers a hypothetical drug used by a first patient cohort at branded prices and by subsequent, "downstream" cohorts at generic prices. Case study 2 explores whether statin assessments should account for generic prices for downstream cohorts that gain access after the initial cohort. Case study 3 uses a simplified spreadsheet model to assess the impact of accounting for generic pricing for inclisiran, used when statins insufficiently reduce cholesterol. Case study 4 amends this model for a hypothetical, advanced, follow-on treatment displacing inclisiran. RESULTS Assessments should include generic pricing even if the first cohort using a drug pays branded prices and only downstream cohorts pay generic prices (case study 1). Because eventual generic pricing for statins did not depend on decisions for downstream cohorts, assessing reimbursement for those cohorts could safely omit generic pricing (case study 2). For inclisiran (case study 3), including generic pricing notably improved estimated cost-effectiveness. Displacing inclisiran with an advanced therapy (case study 4) modestly affected estimated cost-effectiveness. CONCLUSIONS Although this analysis relies on simplified and hypothetical models, it demonstrates that accounting for generic pricing might substantially reduce estimated cost-effectiveness ratios. Doing so when warranted is crucial to improving health technology assessment validity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joshua T Cohen
- Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health, Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Hinman KD, Laforce-Nesbitt SS, Cohen JT, Mundy M, Bliss JM, Horswill AR, Lefort CT. Bi-fluorescent Staphylococcus aureus infection enables single-cell analysis of intracellular killing in vivo. Front Immunol 2023; 14:1089111. [PMID: 36756129 PMCID: PMC9900177 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1089111] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2022] [Accepted: 01/03/2023] [Indexed: 01/24/2023] Open
Abstract
Techniques for studying the clearance of bacterial infections are critical for advances in understanding disease states, immune cell effector functions, and novel antimicrobial therapeutics. Intracellular killing of Staphylococcus aureus by neutrophils can be monitored using a S. aureus strain stably expressing GFP, a fluorophore that is quenched when exposed to the reactive oxygen species (ROS) present in the phagolysosome. Here, we expand upon this method by developing a bi-fluorescent S. aureus killing assay for use in vivo. Conjugating S. aureus with a stable secondary fluorescent marker enables the separation of infected cell samples into three populations: cells that have not engaged in phagocytosis, cells that have engulfed and killed S. aureus, and cells that have viable internalized S. aureus. We identified ATTO647N-NHS Ester as a favorable dye conjugate for generating bi-fluorescent S. aureus due to its stability over time and invariant signal within the neutrophil phagolysosome. To resolve the in vivo utility of ATTO647N/GFP bi-fluorescent S. aureus, we evaluated neutrophil function in a murine model of chronic granulomatous disease (CGD) known to have impaired clearance of S. aureus infection. Analysis of bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) from animals subjected to pulmonary infection with bi-fluorescent S. aureus demonstrated differences in neutrophil antimicrobial function consistent with the established phenotype of CGD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristina D Hinman
- Division of Surgical Research, Department of Surgery, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, RI, United States.,Warren Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, RI, United States.,Graduate Program in Pathobiology, Brown University, Providence, RI, United States
| | | | - Joshua T Cohen
- Division of Surgical Research, Department of Surgery, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, RI, United States
| | - Miles Mundy
- Graduate Program in Pathobiology, Brown University, Providence, RI, United States
| | - Joseph M Bliss
- Warren Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, RI, United States.,Department of Pediatrics, Women and Infants Hospital, Providence, RI, United States
| | - Alexander R Horswill
- Department of Immunology and Microbiology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, United States
| | - Craig T Lefort
- Division of Surgical Research, Department of Surgery, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, RI, United States.,Warren Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, RI, United States
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Zhu Y, Olchanski N, Cohen JT, Freund KM, Faul JD, Fillit HM, Neumann PJ, Lin PJ. Life-Sustaining Treatments Among Medicare Beneficiaries with and without Dementia at the End of Life. J Alzheimers Dis 2023; 96:1183-1193. [PMID: 37955089 PMCID: PMC10777481 DOI: 10.3233/jad-230692] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Older adults with dementia including Alzheimer's disease may have difficulty communicating their treatment preferences and thus may receive intensive end-of-life (EOL) care that confers limited benefits. OBJECTIVE This study compared the use of life-sustaining interventions during the last 90 days of life among Medicare beneficiaries with and without dementia. METHODS This cohort study utilized population-based national survey data from the 2000-2016 Health and Retirement Study linked with Medicare and Medicaid claims. Our sample included Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries aged 65 years or older deceased between 2000 and 2016. The main outcome was receipt of any life-sustaining interventions during the last 90 days of life, including mechanical ventilation, tracheostomy, tube feeding, and cardiopulmonary resuscitation. We used logistic regression, stratified by nursing home use, to examine dementia status (no dementia, non-advanced dementia, advanced dementia) and patient characteristics associated with receiving those interventions. RESULTS Community dwellers with dementia were more likely than those without dementia to receive life-sustaining treatments in their last 90 days of life (advanced dementia: OR = 1.83 [1.42-2.35]; non-advanced dementia: OR = 1.16 [1.01-1.32]). Advance care planning was associated with lower odds of receiving life-sustaining treatments in the community (OR = 0.84 [0.74-0.96]) and in nursing homes (OR = 0.68 [0.53-0.86]). More beneficiaries with advanced dementia received interventions discordant with their EOL treatment preferences. CONCLUSIONS Community dwellers with advanced dementia were more likely to receive life-sustaining treatments at the end of life and such treatments may be discordant with their EOL wishes. Enhancing advance care planning and patient-physician communication may improve EOL care quality for persons with dementia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yingying Zhu
- Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health, Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Natalia Olchanski
- Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health, Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Joshua T. Cohen
- Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health, Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Karen M. Freund
- Center for Health Equity Research, Department of Medicine, Tufts Medical Center, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jessica D. Faul
- Survey Research Center, Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | | | - Peter J. Neumann
- Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health, Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Pei-Jung Lin
- Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health, Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Zhu Y, Olchanski N, Freund KM, Faul JD, Fillit HM, Breslau RM, Cohen JT, Neumann PJ, Lin P. End‐of‐life burdensome interventions among Medicare fee‐for‐service beneficiaries with no dementia, non‐advanced dementia, and advanced dementia. Alzheimers Dement 2022; 18 Suppl 9:e063807. [DOI: 10.1002/alz.063807] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Natalia Olchanski
- Tufts Medical Center and Tufts University School of Medicine Boston MA USA
| | - Karen M Freund
- Tufts Medical Center and Tufts University School of Medicine Boston MA USA
| | | | | | | | - Joshua T Cohen
- Tufts Medical Center and Tufts University School of Medicine Boston MA USA
| | - Peter J Neumann
- Tufts Medical Center and Tufts University School of Medicine Boston MA USA
| | - Pei‐Jung Lin
- Tufts Medical Center and Tufts University School of Medicine Boston MA USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Lin P, Zhu Y, Olchanski N, Cohen JT, Neumann PJ, Faul JD, Fillit HM, Freund KM. Racial and Ethnic Differences in Hospice Use and End‐of‐life Hospitalizations among Medicare Beneficiaries with Dementia. Alzheimers Dement 2022. [DOI: 10.1002/alz.062289] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Pei‐Jung Lin
- Tufts Medical Center and Tufts University School of Medicine Boston MA USA
| | | | - Natalia Olchanski
- Tufts Medical Center and Tufts University School of Medicine Boston MA USA
| | - Joshua T Cohen
- Tufts Medical Center and Tufts University School of Medicine Boston MA USA
| | - Peter J Neumann
- Tufts Medical Center and Tufts University School of Medicine Boston MA USA
| | | | - Howard M Fillit
- Alzheimer’s Drug Discovery Foundation New York NY USA
- Geriatric Medicine, Palliative Care and Neuroscience, The Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai New York NY USA
| | - Karen M Freund
- Tufts Medical Center and Tufts University School of Medicine Boston MA USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Breslau RM, Cohen JT, Ollendorf DA, Neumann PJ. Should Drug Companies Engage with ICER? An Empirical Analysis of How Often Manufacturers Engage with ICER and Whether Engagement May Influence ICER's Cost-Effectiveness Estimates. Pharmacoecon Open 2022; 6:893-895. [PMID: 35871128 PMCID: PMC9596652 DOI: 10.1007/s41669-022-00358-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/12/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel Milstein Breslau
- Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health, Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, 800 Washington St, #063, Boston, MA, 02111, USA
| | - Joshua T Cohen
- Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health, Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, 800 Washington St, #063, Boston, MA, 02111, USA
- Department of Medicine, Tufts University School of Medicine, 145 Harrison Ave, Boston, MA, 02111, USA
| | - Daniel A Ollendorf
- Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health, Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, 800 Washington St, #063, Boston, MA, 02111, USA
- Department of Medicine, Tufts University School of Medicine, 145 Harrison Ave, Boston, MA, 02111, USA
| | - Peter J Neumann
- Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health, Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, 800 Washington St, #063, Boston, MA, 02111, USA.
- Department of Medicine, Tufts University School of Medicine, 145 Harrison Ave, Boston, MA, 02111, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Lavelle TA, Feng X, Keisler M, Cohen JT, Neumann PJ, Prichard D, Schroeder BE, Salyakina D, Espinal PS, Weidner SB, Maron JL. Response to Grosse and Gudgeon. Genet Med 2022; 24:2597-2598. [PMID: 36166002 DOI: 10.1016/j.gim.2022.08.031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2022] [Accepted: 08/29/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Tara A Lavelle
- Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA.
| | - Xue Feng
- Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA
| | - Marlena Keisler
- Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA
| | - Joshua T Cohen
- Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA
| | - Peter J Neumann
- Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA
| | | | | | - Daria Salyakina
- Personalized Medicine and Health Outcomes Research, Nicklaus Children's Hospital, Miami, FL
| | - Paula S Espinal
- Personalized Medicine and Health Outcomes Research, Nicklaus Children's Hospital, Miami, FL
| | - Samuel B Weidner
- Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA
| | - Jill L Maron
- Department of Pediatrics, Women & Infants Hospital of Rhode Island, Providence, RI
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Ma S, Olchanski N, Cohen JT, Ollendorf DA, Neumann PJ, Kim DD. The Impact of Broader Value Elements on Cost-Effectiveness Analysis: Two Case Studies. Value Health 2022; 25:1336-1343. [PMID: 35315331 DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2022.01.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2021] [Revised: 12/29/2021] [Accepted: 01/26/2022] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This study aimed to explore the impact of including broader value elements in cost-effectiveness analyses by presenting 2 case studies, one on human papillomavirus (HPV) infection and one on early-stage Hodgkin's lymphoma (ESHL). METHODS We identified broader value elements (eg, patient and caregiver time, spillover health effects, productivity) from the Second Panel's Impact Inventory and the ISPOR Special Task Force's value flower. We then evaluated the cost-effectiveness of HPV vaccination versus no vaccination (case 1) and combined modality therapy (CMT) versus chemotherapy alone for treatment of adult ESHL (case 2) using published simulation models. For each case study, we compared incremental cost-effectiveness ratios considering health sector impacts only (the "base-case" scenario) with incremental cost-effectiveness ratios incorporating broader value elements. RESULTS For vaccination of US girls against HPV before sexual debut versus no vaccination, the base-case result was $38 334 per disability-adjusted life-year averted. Including each broader value element made cost-effectiveness progressively more favorable, with HPV vaccination becoming cost-saving (ie, reducing costs and averting more disability-adjusted life-years) when the analysis incorporated productivity costs. For CMT versus chemotherapy alone in patients with ESHL, the base-case result indicated that CMT was cost-saving. Including all elements made this treatment's net monetary benefits (the sum of its averted resource costs and the net value of its health impacts) less favorable, even as the contribution from CMT's near-term health benefits grew. CONCLUSIONS Including broader value elements can substantially influence cost-effectiveness ratios, although the direction and the magnitude of their impact can differ across interventions and disease context.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Siyu Ma
- Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health, Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.
| | - Natalia Olchanski
- Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health, Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Medicine, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Joshua T Cohen
- Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health, Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Medicine, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Daniel A Ollendorf
- Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health, Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Medicine, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Peter J Neumann
- Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health, Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Medicine, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| | - David D Kim
- Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health, Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Medicine, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Olchanski N, Lin PJ, Yeh WS, Kowal S, Cohen JT. When are breakthrough therapies cost-effective? J Manag Care Spec Pharm 2022; 28:732-739. [PMID: 35737862 PMCID: PMC10372966 DOI: 10.18553/jmcp.2022.28.7.732] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND: An increasing proportion of novel drug approvals use accelerated pathways, with notable growth in the US Food and Drug Administration-designated breakthrough pathway in recent years. Breakthrough therapy (BT) designation suggests that these therapies offer substantial potential to improve health outcomes but their value for money is not fully understood, as BTs typically cost more than non-BTs (NBTs). OBJECTIVE: To assess the economic value of BTs and factors associated with their reported value. METHODS: Using the Tufts Medical Center Cost-Effectiveness (CE) Analysis Registry, we (1) summarized the CE of BTs, as measured by cost per quality-adjusted-life-year (QALY); (2) compared the CE of BTs and NBTs in the United States; and (3) identified factors associated with BT CE using general estimating equation models across US willingness-to-pay (WTP) benchmarks ($50K-$150K/QALY). RESULTS: Between 2013 and 2018, the US Food and Drug Administration approved 279 drugs, designating 83 (32%) as BTs. Incremental costs and health gains (QALYs) were higher for BTs relative to NBTs ($29,000 vs $20,000 and 0.7 vs 0.2 QALYs, respectively), and BTs had more favorable CE ratios compared with NBTs (median values $38,000/QALY vs $50,000/QALY, respectively). For BTs, hepatitis C treatments had the most favorable CE ratios, which may be driven by the curative nature of some hepatitis C therapies. Furthermore, BT CE ratios for new molecular entities (NMEs) were about 40% lower than ratios for non-NME BTs on average, which may signal more value for money when the BT has a new active molecule. Regression analysis to identify trends driving CE found that BT drugs compared with active comparators (instead of best supportive care) were less likely to be cost-effective at standard US WTP thresholds (odds ratio [OR] = 0.1-0.6) and that BTs in the neoplasm space also trended less likely to be cost-effective (OR = 0.12-0.43). CE ratios reported by studies with industry funding were also more likely to be cost-effective than ratios from studies with other funding sources (OR = 4.3-4.5), though this finding was not significant at WTP thresholds over $50,000/QALY gained. CONCLUSIONS: Evidence from published, peer-reviewed CE studies suggests that BTs may confer greater health benefits than NBTs in terms of overall QALYs. Our analysis supports that the US Food and Drug Administration BT designation may be associated with increased value for money for these BTs. However, factors such as the disease area, NME status, and comparator (active vs standard of care) will also influence whether these therapies are cost-effective. DISCLOSURES: Dr Cohen reports grants or contracts from PhRMA Foundation, National Pharmaceutical Council, AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly and Company, Gilead Sciences, Regeneron, Pfizer, Merck, Johnson & Johnson, Vir Biotechnology, Moderna, Amgen, and Lundbeck; consulting fees from AbbVie, Biogen, IQVIA, Novartis, Partnership for Health Analytic Research, Pharmerit, Precision Health Economics, Sage, Sanofi, and Sarepta; and stock or stock options from Bristol-Myers Squibb, Johnson & Johnson, and Merck. Ms Kowal is an employee and stockholder of Genentech, Inc. Dr Yeh is an employee and stockholder of Roche, Inc.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natalia Olchanski
- Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health, Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA
- Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, Boston, Tufts University, MA
| | - Pei-Jung Lin
- Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health, Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA
- Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, Boston, Tufts University, MA
| | | | | | - Joshua T Cohen
- Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health, Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA
- Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, Boston, Tufts University, MA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Lavelle TA, Feng X, Keisler M, Cohen JT, Neumann PJ, Prichard D, Schroeder BE, Salyakina D, Espinal PS, Weidner SB, Maron JL. Cost-effectiveness of exome and genome sequencing for children with rare and undiagnosed conditions. Genet Med 2022; 24:1349-1361. [PMID: 35396982 DOI: 10.1016/j.gim.2022.03.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2021] [Revised: 03/01/2022] [Accepted: 03/03/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE This study aimed to estimate the cost-effectiveness of exome sequencing (ES) and genome sequencing (GS) for children. METHODS We modeled costs, diagnoses, and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) for diagnostic strategies for critically ill infants (aged <1 year) and children (aged <18 years) with suspected genetic conditions: (1) standard of care (SOC) testing, (2) ES, (3) GS, (4) SOC followed by ES, (5) SOC followed by GS, (6) ES followed by GS, and (7) SOC followed by ES followed by GS. We calculated the 10-year incremental cost per additional diagnosis, and lifetime incremental cost per QALY gained, from a health care perspective. RESULTS First-line GS costs $15,048 per diagnosis vs SOC for infants and $27,349 per diagnosis for children. If GS is unavailable, ES represents the next most efficient option compared with SOC ($15,543 per diagnosis for infants and $28,822 per diagnosis for children). Other strategies provided the same or fewer diagnoses at a higher incremental cost per diagnosis. Lifetime results depend on the patient's assumed long-term prognosis after diagnosis. For infants, GS ranged from cost-saving (vs all alternatives) to $18,877 per QALY (vs SOC). For children, GS (vs SOC) ranged from $119,705 to $490,047 per QALY. CONCLUSION First-line GS may be the most cost-effective strategy for diagnosing infants with suspected genetic conditions. For all children, GS may be cost-effective under certain assumptions. ES is nearly as efficient as GS and hence is a viable option when GS is unavailable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tara A Lavelle
- Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health (CEVR), Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA.
| | - Xue Feng
- Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health (CEVR), Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA
| | - Marlena Keisler
- Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health (CEVR), Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA
| | - Joshua T Cohen
- Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health (CEVR), Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA
| | - Peter J Neumann
- Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health (CEVR), Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA
| | | | | | - Daria Salyakina
- Personalized Medicine and Health Outcomes Research, Nicklaus Children's Hospital, Miami, FL
| | - Paula S Espinal
- Personalized Medicine and Health Outcomes Research, Nicklaus Children's Hospital, Miami, FL
| | - Samuel B Weidner
- Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health (CEVR), Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA
| | - Jill L Maron
- Women & Infants Hospital of Rhode Island, Care New England Health System, Providence, RI
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Lin PJ, Zhu Y, Olchanski N, Cohen JT, Neumann PJ, Faul JD, Fillit HM, Freund KM. Racial and Ethnic Differences in Hospice Use and Hospitalizations at End-of-Life Among Medicare Beneficiaries With Dementia. JAMA Netw Open 2022; 5:e2216260. [PMID: 35679046 PMCID: PMC9185179 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.16260] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
IMPORTANCE The pool of studies examining ethnic and racial differences in hospice use and end-of-life hospitalizations among patients with dementia is limited and results are conflicting, making it difficult to assess health care needs of underresourced racial and ethnic groups. OBJECTIVE To explore differences in end-of-life utilization of hospice and hospital services among patients with dementia by race and ethnicity. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This cohort study used national survey data from the Health and Retirement Study linked with Medicare and Medicaid claims that reflected a range of socioeconomic, health, and psychosocial characteristics. Eligible participants were Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries aged 65 years or older diagnosed with dementia who died between 2000 and 2016. Analyses were performed from June to December 2021. EXPOSURES Race and ethnicity. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES We examined the frequency and costs of hospice care, emergency department (ED) visits, and hospitalizations during the last 180 days of life among Medicare decedents with dementia. We analyzed the proportion of dementia decedents with advance care planning and their end-of-life care preferences. RESULTS The cohort sample included 5058 beneficiaries with dementia (mean [SD] age, 85.5 [8.0] years; 3038 women [60.1%]; 809 [16.0%] non-Hispanic Black, 357 [7.1%] Hispanic, and 3892 non-Hispanic White respondents [76.9%]). In adjusted analysis, non-Hispanic Black decedents (odds ratio [OR], 0.65; 95% CI, 0.55-0.78), nursing home residents (OR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.71-0.93), and survey respondents represented by a proxy (OR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.71-0.99) were less likely to use hospice, whereas older decedents (age 75-84 vs 65-74 years: OR, 1.39; 95% CI, 1.12-1.72; age ≥85 vs 65-74 years: OR, 1.39; 95% CI, 1.13-1.71), women (OR, 1.19; 95% CI, 1.05-1.35), and decedents with higher education (high school vs less than high school: OR, 1.17; 95% CI, 1.01-1.36; more than high school vs less than high school: OR, 1.32; 95% CI, 1.13-1.54), more severe cognitive impairment (OR, 1.51; 95% CI, 1.02-2.23), and more instrumental activities of daily living limitations (OR, 1.07; 95% CI, 1.01-1.12) were associated with higher hospice enrollment. A higher proportion of Black and Hispanic decedents with dementia used ED (645 of 809 [79.7%] and 274 of 357 [76.8%] vs 2753 of 3892 [70.7%]; P < .001) and inpatient services (625 of 809 [77.3%] and 275 of 357 [77.0%] vs 2630 of 3892 [67.5%]; P < .001) and incurred roughly 60% higher inpatient expenditures at the end of life compared with White decedents (estimated mean: Black, $23 279; 95% CI, $20 690-$25 868; Hispanic, $23 471; 95% CI, $19 532-$27 410 vs White, $14 609; 95% CI, $13 800-$15 418). A higher proportion of Black and Hispanic than White beneficiaries with dementia who were enrolled in hospice were subsequently admitted to the ED (56 of 309 [18.1%] and 22 of 153 [14.4%] vs 191 of 1967 [9.7%]; P < .001) or hospital (48 of 309 [15.5%] and 17 of 153 [11.1%] vs 119 of 1967 [6.0%]; P < .001) before death. The proportion of dementia beneficiaries completing advance care planning was lower among Black (146 of 704 [20.7%]) and Hispanic (66 of 308 [21.4%]) beneficiaries compared with White beneficiaries (1871 of 3274 [57.1%]). A higher proportion of Black and Hispanic decedents with dementia had written instructions choosing all care possible to prolong life (30 of 144 [20.8%] and 12 of 65 [18.4%] vs 72 of 1852 [3.9%]), whereas a higher proportion of White decedents preferred to limit care in certain situations (1708 of 1840 [92.8%] vs 114 of 141 [80.9%] and 51 of 64 [79.7%]), withhold treatments (1448 of 1799 [80.5%] vs 87 of 140 [62.1%] and 41 of 62 [66.1%]), and forgo extensive life-prolonging measures (1712 of 1838 [93.1%] vs 120 of 138 [87.0%] and 54 of 65 [83.1%]). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE The results of this cohort study highlight unique end-of-life care utilization and treatment preferences across racial and ethnic groups among patients with dementia. Medicare should consider alternative payment models to promote culturally competent end-of-life care and reduce low-value interventions and costs among the population with dementia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pei-Jung Lin
- Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health, Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Yingying Zhu
- Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health, Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Natalia Olchanski
- Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health, Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Joshua T. Cohen
- Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health, Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Peter J. Neumann
- Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health, Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Jessica D. Faul
- Survey Research Center, Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
| | | | - Karen M. Freund
- Center for Health Equity Research, Department of Medicine, Tufts Medical Center, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Chambers JD, Silver MC, Berklein FC, Cohen JT, Neumann PJ. Are Medical Devices Cost-Effective? Appl Health Econ Health Policy 2022; 20:235-241. [PMID: 34820784 DOI: 10.1007/s40258-021-00698-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/03/2021] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Medical devices can offer important therapeutic advances but, as for any medical interventions, there are questions about their costs and benefits. We examined health benefits and costs for pre-market approved (PMA) devices approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) (1999-2015), grouping them by generic category (e.g., drug-eluting stents) and indication. METHODS We searched PubMed for incremental health gain estimates [measured in quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs)] and incremental costs for each device category compared to previously available treatments. We calculated incremental cost-effectiveness ratios by dividing the average incremental costs by the average incremental QALY gains. In sensitivity analysis, we repeated the analysis when excluding industry-funded studies. RESULTS We identified at least one relevant cost-utility or comparative-effectiveness study for 88 devices (15.9% of non-cosmetic devices approved from 1999 to 2015), and at least one device across 53 (26.2%) generic categories. The median (mean) incremental cost across generic device categories was $1701 ($13,320). The median (mean) incremental health gain across generic device categories was 0.13 (0.46) QALYs. We found that cost-effectiveness ratios for 36 of 53 (68%) and 43 of 53 (81%) device categories fell below (were more favorable than) $50,000 and $150,000 per QALY, respectively. Results were roughly similar when we excluded industry-funded studies. CONCLUSIONS We found that roughly one-quarter of the major PMA medical device categories have published cost-effectiveness evidence accessible through a large, publicly available database. Available evidence suggests that devices generally offer good value, as judged relative to established cost-effectiveness benchmarks.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James D Chambers
- Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health, Tufts Medical Center, 35 Kneeland St., Boston, MA, 02111, USA.
| | - Madison C Silver
- Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health, Tufts Medical Center, 35 Kneeland St., Boston, MA, 02111, USA
| | - Flora C Berklein
- Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health, Tufts Medical Center, 35 Kneeland St., Boston, MA, 02111, USA
| | - Joshua T Cohen
- Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health, Tufts Medical Center, 35 Kneeland St., Boston, MA, 02111, USA
| | - Peter J Neumann
- Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health, Tufts Medical Center, 35 Kneeland St., Boston, MA, 02111, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Cohen JT, Danise M, Hinman KD, Neumann BM, Johnson R, Wilson ZS, Chorzalska A, Dubielecka PM, Lefort CT. Engraftment, Fate, and Function of HoxB8-Conditional Neutrophil Progenitors in the Unconditioned Murine Host. Front Cell Dev Biol 2022; 10:840894. [PMID: 35127689 PMCID: PMC8812959 DOI: 10.3389/fcell.2022.840894] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2021] [Accepted: 01/05/2022] [Indexed: 01/13/2023] Open
Abstract
The development and use of murine myeloid progenitor cell lines that are conditionally immortalized through expression of HoxB8 has provided a valuable tool for studies of neutrophil biology. Recent work has extended the utility of HoxB8-conditional progenitors to the in vivo setting via their transplantation into irradiated mice. Here, we describe the isolation of HoxB8-conditional progenitor cell lines that are unique in their ability to engraft in the naïve host in the absence of conditioning of the hematopoietic niche. Our results indicate that HoxB8-conditional progenitors engraft in a β1 integrin-dependent manner and transiently generate donor-derived mature neutrophils. Furthermore, we show that neutrophils derived in vivo from transplanted HoxB8-conditional progenitors are mobilized to the periphery and recruited to sites of inflammation in a manner that depends on the C-X-C chemokine receptor 2 and β2 integrins, the same mechanisms that have been described for recruitment of endogenous primary neutrophils. Together, our studies advance the understanding of HoxB8-conditional neutrophil progenitors and describe an innovative tool that, by virtue of its ability to engraft in the naïve host, will facilitate mechanistic in vivo experimentation on neutrophils.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joshua T. Cohen
- Division of Surgical Research, Department of Surgery, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, RI, United States
| | - Michael Danise
- Division of Surgical Research, Department of Surgery, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, RI, United States
| | - Kristina D. Hinman
- Division of Surgical Research, Department of Surgery, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, RI, United States
- Graduate Program in Pathobiology, Brown University, Providence, RI, United States
| | - Brittany M. Neumann
- Division of Surgical Research, Department of Surgery, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, RI, United States
| | - Renita Johnson
- Division of Surgical Research, Department of Surgery, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, RI, United States
| | - Zachary S. Wilson
- Division of Surgical Research, Department of Surgery, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, RI, United States
- Graduate Program in Pathobiology, Brown University, Providence, RI, United States
| | - Anna Chorzalska
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, RI, United States
| | | | - Craig T. Lefort
- Division of Surgical Research, Department of Surgery, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, RI, United States
- *Correspondence: Craig T. Lefort,
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Neumann PJ, Podolsky MI, Basu A, Ollendorf DA, Cohen JT. Do Cost-Effectiveness Analyses Account for Drug Genericization? A Literature Review and Assessment of Implications. Value Health 2022; 25:59-68. [PMID: 35031100 DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2021.06.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2021] [Revised: 06/18/2021] [Accepted: 06/23/2021] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES We investigated how health technology assessment (HTA) organizations around the world have handled drug genericization (an allowance for future generic drug entry and subsequent drug price declines) in their guidelines for cost-effectiveness analyses (CEAs). We also analyzed a large sample of published CEAs to examine prevailing practices in the field. METHODS We reviewed 43 HTA guidelines to determine whether and how they addressed drug genericization in their CEAs. We also selected a sample of 270 US-based CEAs from the Tufts Medical Center's CEA Registry, restricting the sample to studies on pharmaceuticals published from 1991 to 2019 and to analyses taking a lifetime time horizon. We determined whether each CEA examined genericization (and if so, whether in base case or sensitivity analyses), and how inclusion of genericization influenced the estimated incremental cost-effectiveness ratios. RESULTS Fourteen (33%) of the 43 HTA guidelines mention genericization for CEAs and 4 (9%) recommend that base case analyses include assumptions about future drug price changes due to genericization. Most published CEAs (95%) do not include assumptions about future generic prices for intervention drugs. Only 2% include such assumptions about comparator drugs. Most studies (72%) conduct sensitivity analyses on drug prices unrelated to genericization. CONCLUSIONS The omission of assumptions about genericization means that CEAs may misrepresent the long run opportunity costs for drugs. The field needs clearer guidance for when CEAs should account for genericization, and for the inclusion of other price dynamics that might influence a drug's cost-effectiveness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter J Neumann
- Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.
| | - Meghan I Podolsky
- Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Anirban Basu
- The CHOICE Institute, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Daniel A Ollendorf
- Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Joshua T Cohen
- Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Neumann PJ, Ollendorf DA, Cohen JT. Value-based drug pricing in the Biden era: Opportunities and prospects. Health Serv Res 2021; 56:1093-1099. [PMID: 34085289 PMCID: PMC8586482 DOI: 10.1111/1475-6773.13686] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2021] [Revised: 05/06/2021] [Accepted: 05/06/2021] [Indexed: 12/01/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Peter J Neumann
- Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Daniel A Ollendorf
- Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Joshua T Cohen
- Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Lin P, Daly A, Olchanski N, Zhu Y, Cohen JT, Neumann PJ, Faul JD, Fillit HM, Freund KM. Alzheimer’s disease medication utilization patterns: Disparities in treatment initiation, non‐adherence, and discontinuation. Alzheimers Dement 2021. [DOI: 10.1002/alz.054849] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
|
23
|
Affiliation(s)
- Peter J Neumann
- From the Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health, Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, Boston
| | - Joshua T Cohen
- From the Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health, Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, Boston
| | - Daniel A Ollendorf
- From the Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health, Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, Boston
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Silver MC, Neumann PJ, Ma S, Kim DD, Cohen JT, Nyaku M, Roberts C, Sinha A, Ollendorf DA. Frequency and impact of the inclusion of broader measures of value in economic evaluations of vaccines. Vaccine 2021; 39:6727-6734. [PMID: 34656380 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.09.070] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2021] [Revised: 08/25/2021] [Accepted: 09/24/2021] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The health and economic benefits of immunization may extend beyond the elements traditionally included in cost-effectiveness analyses (CEAs). This review investigated how broader impacts are considered in economic evaluations of vaccines and whether their inclusion would substantially change CEA findings. METHODS We reviewed CEAs of vaccines associated with the largest global health burden, published from 2014 to 2019 using the Tufts CEA Registry and Tufts Global Health CEA Registry. We supplemented this with a systematic review of published and grey literature. We conducted descriptive analyses to examine the frequency of inclusion of specific social factors and study characteristics associated with their inclusion. We also conducted a case study of the human papilloma virus (HPV) vaccine to illustrate the potential change in CEA findings from selected social impacts. RESULTS We identified 475 relevant health economic assessments. Overall, 40% of studies included at least one category of social impact. The most commonly included non-healthcare cost among cost-per-QALY studies was productivity (25%), while cost-per-DALY studies reported transportation costs most frequently (24%). Few studies examined the impact of vaccination on other sectors such as education and housing (<3%). Middle-income and North American settings were positively associated with social impact inclusion, while sub-Saharan African location was negatively associated. In the HPV case study, the addition of nonhealth costs improved cost-effectiveness by up to 90% or made the vaccine cost-saving, depending on geographic setting. The cost-saving scenario saved up to $30,000 in costs per case of cervical cancer averted. CONCLUSIONS A minority of vaccine CEAs include social impacts, particularly for nonhealth sectors. The omission of these impacts may result in a systematic undervaluation of vaccines from a societal perspective. Further efforts are required to document the full benefits of vaccination for policymaker consideration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Madison C Silver
- Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health, Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, USA.
| | - Peter J Neumann
- Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health, Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, USA
| | - Siyu Ma
- Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health, Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, USA
| | - David D Kim
- Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health, Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, USA
| | - Joshua T Cohen
- Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health, Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, USA
| | | | | | | | - Daniel A Ollendorf
- Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health, Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, USA
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Cohen JT, Miner TJ. Who Should Decide When Palliative Surgery Is Justifiable? AMA J Ethics 2021; 23:E761-765. [PMID: 34859768 DOI: 10.1001/amajethics.2021.761] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Abstract
No one person has the right or ability to make decisions about to whom or according to which criteria palliative surgery should be offered. Instead, patient and surgeon together must consider symptom severity, goals of care, and the value palliative surgery could add to the patient's health experience or quality of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joshua T Cohen
- Surgical resident at the Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University in Providence, Rhode Island
| | - Thomas J Miner
- Professor of surgery at the Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University in Providence, Rhode Island
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Dementia is often underdiagnosed and this problem is more common among some ethnoracial groups. OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to examine racial and ethnic disparities in the timeliness of receiving a clinical diagnosis of dementia. RESEARCH DESIGN This was a prospective cohort study. SUBJECTS A total of 3966 participants age 70 years and above with probable dementia in the Health and Retirement Study, linked with their Medicare and Medicaid claims. MEASURES We performed logistic regression to compare the likelihood of having a missed or delayed dementia diagnosis in claims by race/ethnicity. We analyzed dementia severity, measured by cognition and daily function, at the time of a dementia diagnosis documented in claims, and estimated average dementia diagnosis delay, by race/ethnicity. RESULTS A higher proportion of non-Hispanic Blacks and Hispanics had a missed/delayed clinical dementia diagnosis compared with non-Hispanic Whites (46% and 54% vs. 41%, P<0.001). Fully adjusted logistic regression results suggested more frequent missed/delayed dementia diagnoses among non-Hispanic Blacks (odds ratio=1.12; 95% confidence interval: 0.91-1.38) and Hispanics (odds ratio=1.58; 95% confidence interval: 1.20-2.07). Non-Hispanic Blacks and Hispanics had a poorer cognitive function and more functional limitations than non-Hispanic Whites around the time of receiving a claims-based dementia diagnosis. The estimated mean diagnosis delay was 34.6 months for non-Hispanic Blacks and 43.8 months for Hispanics, compared with 31.2 months for non-Hispanic Whites. CONCLUSIONS Non-Hispanic Blacks and Hispanics may experience a missed or delayed diagnosis of dementia more often and have longer diagnosis delays. When diagnosed, non-Hispanic Blacks and Hispanics may have more advanced dementia. Public health efforts should prioritize racial and ethnic underrepresented communities when promoting early diagnosis of dementia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pei-Jung Lin
- Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health, Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA
- Department of Medicine, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA
| | - Allan T. Daly
- Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health, Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA
| | - Natalia Olchanski
- Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health, Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA
| | - Joshua T. Cohen
- Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health, Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA
- Department of Medicine, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA
| | - Peter J. Neumann
- Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health, Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA
- Department of Medicine, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA
| | - Jessica D. Faul
- Survey Research Center, Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | | | - Karen M. Freund
- Department of Medicine, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA
- Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Olchanski N, van Klaveren D, Cohen JT, Wong JB, Ruthazer R, Kent DM. Targeting of the diabetes prevention program leads to substantial benefits when capacity is constrained. Acta Diabetol 2021; 58:707-722. [PMID: 33517494 PMCID: PMC8276501 DOI: 10.1007/s00592-021-01672-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2020] [Accepted: 01/04/2021] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Approximately 84 million people in the USA have pre-diabetes, but only a fraction of them receive proven effective therapies to prevent type 2 diabetes. We estimated the value of prioritizing individuals at highest risk of progression to diabetes for treatment, compared to non-targeted treatment of individuals meeting inclusion criteria for the Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP). METHODS Using microsimulation to project outcomes in the DPP trial population, we compared two interventions to usual care: (1) lifestyle modification and (2) metformin administration. For each intervention, we compared targeted and non-targeted strategies, assuming either limited or unlimited program capacity. We modeled the individualized risk of developing diabetes and projected diabetic outcomes to yield lifetime costs and quality-adjusted life expectancy, from which we estimated net monetary benefits (NMB) for both lifestyle and metformin versus usual care. RESULTS Compared to usual care, lifestyle modification conferred positive benefits and reduced lifetime costs for all eligible individuals. Metformin's NMB was negative for the lowest population risk quintile. By avoiding use when costs outweighed benefits, targeted administration of metformin conferred a benefit of $500 per person. If only 20% of the population could receive treatment, when prioritizing individuals based on diabetes risk, rather than treating a 20% random sample, the difference in NMB ranged from $14,000 to $20,000 per person. CONCLUSIONS Targeting active diabetes prevention to patients at highest risk could improve health outcomes and reduce costs compared to providing the same intervention to a similar number of patients with pre-diabetes without targeted selection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natalia Olchanski
- Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, 800 Washington Street #63, Boston, MA, 02111, USA.
| | - David van Klaveren
- Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, 800 Washington Street #63, Boston, MA, 02111, USA
| | - Joshua T Cohen
- Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, 800 Washington Street #63, Boston, MA, 02111, USA
| | - John B Wong
- Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, 800 Washington Street #63, Boston, MA, 02111, USA
- Division of Clinical Decision Making, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Robin Ruthazer
- Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, 800 Washington Street #63, Boston, MA, 02111, USA
| | - David M Kent
- Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, 800 Washington Street #63, Boston, MA, 02111, USA
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Cohen JT, Charpentier KP, Miner TJ, Cioffi WG, Beard RE. Lymphopenia following pancreaticoduodenectomy is associated with pancreatic fistula formation. Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 2021; 25:242-250. [PMID: 34053927 PMCID: PMC8180408 DOI: 10.14701/ahbps.2021.25.2.242] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2020] [Revised: 12/07/2020] [Accepted: 12/31/2020] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Backgrounds/Aims Post-operative pancreatic fistulas (POPF) are a major source of morbidity following pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). This study aims to investigate if persistent lymphopenia, a known marker of sepsis, can act as an additional marker of POPF with clinical implications that could help direct drain management. Methods A retrospective chart review of all patients who underwent PD in a single hospital network from 2008 to 2018. Persistent lymphopenia was defined as lymphopenia beyond post-operative day #3. Results Of the 201 patients who underwent PD during the study period 161 patients had relevant laboratory data, 81 of whom had persistent lymphopenia. 17 patients with persistent lymphopenia went on to develop a POPF, compared to 7 patients without. Persistent lymphopenia had a negative predictive value of 91.3%. Multivariate analysis revealed only persistent lymphopenia as being independently associated with POPF (HR 2.57, 95% CI 1.07-6.643, p=0.039). Patients with persistent lymphopenia were more likely to have a complication requiring intervention (56.8% vs 35.0%, p<0.001). Conclusions Persistent lymphopenia is a readily available early marker of POPF that holds the potential to identify clinically relevant POPF in patients where no surgical drain is present, and to act as an adjunct of drain amylase helping to guide drain management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joshua T Cohen
- Department of Surgery, Rhode Island Hospital, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Kevin P Charpentier
- Department of Surgery, Rhode Island Hospital, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Thomas J Miner
- Department of Surgery, Rhode Island Hospital, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
| | - William G Cioffi
- Department of Surgery, Rhode Island Hospital, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Rachel E Beard
- Department of Surgery, Rhode Island Hospital, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Cohen JT, Danise M, Machan JT, Zhao R, Lefort CT. Murine Myeloid Progenitors Attenuate Immune Dysfunction Induced by Hemorrhagic Shock. Stem Cell Reports 2021; 16:324-336. [PMID: 33482101 PMCID: PMC7878835 DOI: 10.1016/j.stemcr.2020.12.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2020] [Revised: 12/20/2020] [Accepted: 12/21/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Hemorrhagic shock induces an aberrant immune response characterized by simultaneous induction of a proinflammatory state and impaired host defenses. The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of conditionally immortalized neutrophil progenitors (NPs) on this aberrant immune response. We employed a mouse model of hemorrhagic shock, followed by the adoptive transfer of NPs and subsequent inoculation of Staphylococcus aureus to induce pneumonia. We observed that transplant of NPs decreases the proportion of host neutrophils that express programmed death ligand 1 and intercellular adhesion molecule 1 in the context of prior hemorrhage. Following hemorrhage, NP transplant decreased proinflammatory cytokines in the lungs, increased neutrophil migration into the airspaces, and enhanced bacterial clearance. Further, hemorrhagic shock improved NP engraftment in the bone marrow. These results suggest that NPs hold the potential for use as a cellular therapy in the treatment and prevention of secondary infection following hemorrhagic shock. Myeloid progenitors restore a competent inflammatory response to pneumonia Progenitor transplantation promotes clearance of secondary S. aureus pneumonia Hemorrhagic shock enhances engraftment of transplanted myeloid progenitors
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joshua T Cohen
- Division of Surgical Research, Department of Surgery, Rhode Island Hospital, 593 Eddy Street, Providence, RI 02903, USA
| | - Michael Danise
- Division of Surgical Research, Department of Surgery, Rhode Island Hospital, 593 Eddy Street, Providence, RI 02903, USA
| | - Jason T Machan
- Lifespan Biostatistics Core, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, RI 02903, USA
| | - Runping Zhao
- Division of Surgical Research, Department of Surgery, Rhode Island Hospital, 593 Eddy Street, Providence, RI 02903, USA
| | - Craig T Lefort
- Division of Surgical Research, Department of Surgery, Rhode Island Hospital, 593 Eddy Street, Providence, RI 02903, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Neumann PJ, Cohen JT, Kim DD, Ollendorf DA. Consideration Of Value-Based Pricing For Treatments And Vaccines Is Important, Even In The COVID-19 Pandemic. Health Aff (Millwood) 2021; 40:53-61. [DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.2020.01548] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Peter J. Neumann
- Peter J. Neumann is a professor and director of the Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health at the Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, in Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Joshua T. Cohen
- Joshua T. Cohen is a research associate professor at the Center for Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health, Tufts Medical Center
| | - David D. Kim
- David D. Kim is an assistant professor in the Center for Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health, Tufts Medical Center
| | - Daniel A. Ollendorf
- Daniel A. Ollendorf is director of value measurement and global health initiatives, Center for Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health, Tufts Medical Center
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Lin P, Daly A, Olchanski N, Cohen JT, Neumann PJ, Faul JD, Fillit HM, Freund KM. Dementia diagnosis disparities by race and ethnicity. Alzheimers Dement 2020. [DOI: 10.1002/alz.043183] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Howard M Fillit
- Geriatric Medicine Palliative Care and Neuroscience The Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai New York NY USA
- Alzheimer’s Drug Discovery Foundation New York NY USA
| | - Karen M Freund
- Tufts Medical Center and Tufts University School of Medicine Boston MA USA
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Kim DD, Silver MC, Kunst N, Cohen JT, Ollendorf DA, Neumann PJ. Correction to: Perspective and Costing in Cost‑Effectiveness Analysis, 1974-2018. Pharmacoeconomics 2020; 38:1377. [PMID: 33089479 PMCID: PMC7661411 DOI: 10.1007/s40273-020-00968-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
The article Perspective and Costing in Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David D Kim
- Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health, Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, 800 Washington St, Box 063, Boston, MA, 02111, USA.
- Department of Medicine, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.
| | - Madison C Silver
- Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health, Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, 800 Washington St, Box 063, Boston, MA, 02111, USA
| | - Natalia Kunst
- Department of Health Management and Health Economics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- Cancer Outcomes, Public Policy and Effectiveness Research (COPPER) Center, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
- LINK Medical Research, Oslo, Norway
| | - Joshua T Cohen
- Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health, Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, 800 Washington St, Box 063, Boston, MA, 02111, USA
- Department of Medicine, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Daniel A Ollendorf
- Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health, Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, 800 Washington St, Box 063, Boston, MA, 02111, USA
- Department of Medicine, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Peter J Neumann
- Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health, Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, 800 Washington St, Box 063, Boston, MA, 02111, USA
- Department of Medicine, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Lin PJ, Cohen JT, Neumann PJ. Preparing the health-care system to pay for new Alzheimer's drugs. Alzheimers Dement 2020; 16:1568-1570. [PMID: 32808733 PMCID: PMC7666042 DOI: 10.1002/alz.12155] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2020] [Revised: 06/03/2020] [Accepted: 06/28/2020] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
Biogen's announcement last fall that it will seek U.S. Food and Drug Administration approval for its Alzheimer's disease (AD) treatment, aducanumab, 7 months after the drug was declared a failure, buoyed patients and families, but put health payers and policymakers on alert. Whether aducanumab succeeds, other disease-modifying therapies for AD will follow, and the health-care system is unprepared for the reimbursement and access challenges. Novel AD therapies are much needed, but we cannot assume substantial cost offsets. With forethought and preparation, however, the health-care system can accommodate new AD drugs. First, we urge the use of cost-effectiveness of new Alzheimer's treatments as a starting point for setting value-based prices. Second, payments for new AD therapies should ideally incorporate a performance warranty, which helps apportion risk associated with initial therapy value estimates between drug manufacturers and payers. Third, we urge consideration of "subscription" payment agreements to address system affordability issues.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pei-Jung Lin
- Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health, Tufts Medical Center, Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Joshua T Cohen
- Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health, Tufts Medical Center, Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Peter J Neumann
- Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health, Tufts Medical Center, Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Ma S, Kim DD, Cohen JT, Neumann PJ. Measuring "Fearonomic Effects" in Valuing Therapies: An Application to COVID-19 in China. Value Health 2020; 23:1405-1408. [PMID: 33127009 PMCID: PMC7384788 DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2020.06.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2020] [Revised: 05/15/2020] [Accepted: 06/09/2020] [Indexed: 05/10/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To develop a checklist that helps quantify the economic impact associated with fear of contagion and to illustrate how one might use the checklist by presenting a case study featuring China during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak. METHODS Based on "fearonomic effects," a qualitative framework that conceptualizes the direct and indirect economic effects caused by the fear of contagion, we created a checklist to facilitate empirical estimation. As a case study, we first identified relevant sectors affected by China's lockdown policies implemented just before the Lunar New Year (LNY) week. To quantify the immediate impact, we then estimated the projected spending levels in 2020 in the absence of COVID-19 and compared these projections with actual spending during the LNY week. Data sources used include Chinese and global websites. To characterize uncertainty, we reported upper and lower bound estimates and calculated midpoints for each range. RESULTS The COVID-19 epidemic is estimated to cost China's economy $283 billion ($196-369 billion), that is, ¥2.0 trillion renminbi (¥1.4-¥2.6 trillion), during the LNY week. Reduced restaurant and movie theater business ($106 [$103-$109] billion, 37.5% [36.4%-38.5%]) and reduced public transportation utilization ($96 [$13-$179] billion dollars, 33.9% [4.6%-63.3%]) explain most of this loss, followed by travel restrictions and the resulting loss of hotel business and tourism ($80.36 billion, 28.4%). CONCLUSION Our checklist can help quantify the immediate and near-term impact of COVID-19 on a country's economy. It can also help researchers and policy makers consider the broader economic and social consequences when valuing future vaccines and treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Siyu Ma
- The Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health, Institute of Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.
| | - David D Kim
- The Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health, Institute of Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Medicine, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Joshua T Cohen
- The Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health, Institute of Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Medicine, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Peter J Neumann
- The Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health, Institute of Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Medicine, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Cohen JT, Hyska-Campbell M, Alexander AL, Wu EY, Perera PN, Beard RE. Pancreatic intraductal tubulopapillary neoplasm progression requiring completion pancreatectomy: A case report and literature review. Int J Surg Case Rep 2020; 76:492-496. [PMID: 33207417 PMCID: PMC7591552 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2020.10.037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2020] [Revised: 10/08/2020] [Accepted: 10/08/2020] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Intraductal tubulopapillary neoplasm (ITPN) is a recently described rare tumor of the pancreas. Diagnostic approach and treatment are based on relatively few cases. PRESENTATION OF CASE Here we report a case of a 68-year-old male presenting with an ampullary adenoma with high grade dysplasia who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy and was incidentally found to have an ITPN at the pancreatic resection margin with areas of microinvasion throughout the resected specimen. He went on to rapidly develop an invasive adenocarcinoma arising in association with recurrent ITPN in the remnant pancreas requiring a completion total pancreatectomy. DISCUSSION Patients with ITPN present with non-specific symptoms and diagnosis can be challenging. Radiographic evaluation will reveal tumor ingrowth into the main pancreatic duct and distal duct dilatation without upstream dilation or mucinous engorgement. ITPNs are treated with formal resection given that determination of an invasive component can be difficult and the risk of malignant transformation. Following resection, recurrences are infrequent and 5-year survival is over 70 % even with microinvasion. CONCLUSIONS ITPNs can follow a variable clinical course but hold the potential for malignant transformation. When ITPN is incidentally found at a pancreatic resection margin, we recommend completion resection due to the risk of local recurrence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joshua T Cohen
- Department of Surgery, Rhode Island Hospital, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, United States
| | - Marsela Hyska-Campbell
- Department of Radiology, Rhode Island Hospital, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, United States
| | - Abigail L Alexander
- Department of Pathology, Rhode Island Hospital, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, United States
| | - Elizabeth Yiru Wu
- Department of Pathology, Rhode Island Hospital, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, United States
| | - Pranith N Perera
- Department of Gastroenterology, Rhode Island Hospital, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, United States
| | - Rachel E Beard
- Department of Surgery, Rhode Island Hospital, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Our objective was to examine perspective and costing approaches used in cost-effectiveness analyses (CEAs) and the distribution of reported incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs). METHODS We analyzed the Tufts Medical Center's CEA and Global Health CEA registries, containing 6907 cost-per-quality-adjusted-life-year (QALY) and 698 cost-per-disability-adjusted-life-year (DALY) studies published through 2018. We examined how often published CEAs included non-health consequences and their impact on ICERs. We also reviewed 45 country-specific guidelines to examine recommended analytic perspectives. RESULTS Study authors often mis-specified or did not clearly state the perspective used. After re-classification by registry reviewers, a healthcare sector or payer perspective was most prevalent (74%). CEAs rarely included unrelated medical costs and impacts on non-healthcare sectors. The most common non-health consequence included was productivity loss in the cost-per-QALY studies (12%) and patient transportation in the cost-per-DALY studies (21%). Of 19,946 cost-per-QALY ratios, the median ICER was $US26,000/QALY (interquartile range [IQR] 2900-110,000), and 18% were cost saving and QALY increasing. Of 5572 cost-per-DALY ratios, the median ICER was $US430/DALY (IQR 67-3400), and 8% were cost saving and DALY averting. Based on 16 cost-per-QALY studies (2017-2018) reporting 68 ICERs from both the healthcare sector and societal perspectives, the median ICER from a societal perspective ($US22,710/QALY [IQR 11,991-49,603]) was more favorable than from a healthcare sector perspective ($US30,402/QALY [IQR 10,486-77,179]). Most governmental guidelines (67%) recommended either a healthcare sector or a payer perspective. CONCLUSION Researchers should justify and be transparent about their choice of perspective and costing approaches. The use of the impact inventory and reporting of disaggregate outcomes can reduce inconsistencies and confusion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David D Kim
- Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health, Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, 800 Washington St, Box 063, Boston, MA, 02111, USA.
- Department of Medicine, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.
| | - Madison C Silver
- Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health, Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, 800 Washington St, Box 063, Boston, MA, 02111, USA
| | - Natalia Kunst
- Department of Health Management and Health Economics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- Cancer Outcomes, Public Policy and Effectiveness Research (COPPER) Center, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
- LINK Medical Research, Oslo, Norway
| | - Joshua T Cohen
- Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health, Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, 800 Washington St, Box 063, Boston, MA, 02111, USA
- Department of Medicine, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Daniel A Ollendorf
- Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health, Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, 800 Washington St, Box 063, Boston, MA, 02111, USA
- Department of Medicine, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Peter J Neumann
- Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health, Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, 800 Washington St, Box 063, Boston, MA, 02111, USA
- Department of Medicine, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Cohen JT, Fallon EA, Charpentier KP, Cioffi WG, Miner TJ. Improving the value of palliative surgery by optimizing patient selection: The role of long-term survival on high impact palliative intent operations. Am J Surg 2020; 221:1018-1023. [PMID: 32980077 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2020.08.034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2020] [Revised: 08/24/2020] [Accepted: 08/25/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In order to better characterize outcomes of palliative surgery (PS), we evaluated patients that experienced top quartile survival to elucidate predictors of high impact PS. METHODS All PS performed on advanced cancer patients from 2003 to 2017 were identified from a PS database. RESULTS 167 patients were identified. Multivariate analysis demonstrated the ability to rise from a chair was independently associated with top quartile survival (HR 7.61, 95% CI 2.12-48.82, p=0.008) as was the need for re-operation (HR 2.81, 95% CI 1.26-6.30, p=0.0012). Patients who were able to rise from a chair had significantly prolonged overall survival (320 vs 87 days, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Although not the primary goal, long-term survival can be achieved following PS and is associated with re-operation and the ability to rise from a chair. These patients experience the benefits of PS for a longer period of time, which in turn maximizes value and positive impact. SUMMARY Long-term survival and symptom control can be achieved in highly selected advanced cancer patients following palliative surgery. The ability of the patient to independently rise from a chair and the provider to offer a re-operation when indicated are associated with long-term survival following a palliative operation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joshua T Cohen
- Department of Surgery, Rhode Island Hospital, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Eleanor A Fallon
- Department of Surgery, Rhode Island Hospital, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Kevin P Charpentier
- Department of Surgery, Rhode Island Hospital, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
| | - William G Cioffi
- Department of Surgery, Rhode Island Hospital, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Thomas J Miner
- Department of Surgery, Rhode Island Hospital, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Abstract
The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) is gaining traction as a biomarker with utility in a variety of malignancies including melanoma. Intact lymphocyte function is necessary for tumor surveillance and destruction, and neutrophils play a role in suppressing lymphocyte proliferation and in the induction of lymphocyte apoptosis. Early research in melanoma indicates that in high-risk localized melanoma, a high NLR is correlated with worse overall and disease-free survival. Similarly, in metastatic melanoma treated with both metastasectomy and immunotherapies, an elevated NLR is predictive of shortened overall survival and progression-free survival. Future studies incorporating NLR into more traditional melanoma prognostic markers while employing more granular outcomes, are needed to realize the full potential of NLR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joshua T Cohen
- Department of Surgery, Rhode Island Hospital, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Thomas J Miner
- Department of Surgery, Rhode Island Hospital, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Michael P Vezeridis
- Department of Surgery, Rhode Island Hospital, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Parsons SK, Bhakta N, Rodday AM, Scharman C, André M, Federico M, Friedberg JW, Friedman DL, Gallamini A, Hay AE, Kahl BS, Keller FG, Kelly KM, Meyer RM, Raemaekers J, Robison LL, Hudson MM, Cohen JT, Evens AM, Wong FL. Lifelong disease burden of chemotherapy in Hodgkin lymphoma (HL): A simulation study from the St. Jude Lifetime (SJLIFE) Cohort and HL International Study for Individual Care (HoLISTIC). J Clin Oncol 2020. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2020.38.15_suppl.12068] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
12068 Background: Current emphasis for childhood and young adults with HL is to maintain high cure rates while concurrently identifying regimens to reduce excess long-term mortality/morbidity. Thus, understanding the late effects (LE) of contemporary clinical trials (CCT) for HL is critical. Methods: We used simulation to estimate the projected life expectancy (LExp), quality adjusted life-expectancy (QALE) & cause of death (COD) in a large cohort of HL CCT patients (pts) in the recently established HoLISTIC consortium by linking long-term risk models from the SJLIFE cohort. Individual patient data (IPD) on bleomycin, alkylating agents and anthracycline were extracted & harmonized for 982 HL pts in 5 prospective CCT (mean diagnosis age 19y, range 3-30y; 51% male; all treated with chemotherapy only; progression-free survival [PFS] >5y) in the HoLISTIC database. LExp, QALE & COD were projected using a previously developed microsimulation model (Bhakta, Blood [Supplement], 2019) that incorporated mortality & incidence of LEs by diagnosis age, sex, race, treatment exposures & attained age estimated from 5,522 adult 10-y survivors of childhood cancers in the SJLIFE cohort (56% male; mean age at last follow-up 35y, range 19-68). Microsimulation was applied to 10,000 randomly selected survivors of HL CCT cohort, from 10y after HL diagnosis until death to project the LExp, QALE & COD. Results: Assuming 10-y PFS, LExp and QALEs projected for the HL CCT cohort using adjusted US general population rates linked with the SJLIFE microsimulation model, COD and trial-specific exposures are shown in the Table. Conclusions: A novel lifetime simulation approach was used to project LExp, QALE & COD by linking together IPD from CCTs with the long-term risk model of the SJLIFE survivorship cohort. Despite differences in PFS, reflecting in part the variation in risk/stage status, the projected long-term outcomes were similar. Our approach highlights a new opportunity to inform future clinical trial design and aid provider & patient decision-making. [Table: see text]
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Marc André
- Université Catholique de Louvain, CHU UCL Namur, Department of Hematology, Yvoir, Belgium
| | - Massimo Federico
- Dept of Diagnostic, Clinical and Public Health Medicine, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | | | - Debra L. Friedman
- Vanderbilt University Medical Center/Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, TN
| | | | - Annette E. Hay
- Canadian Cancer Trials Group, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | - Brad S. Kahl
- University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center, Madison, WI
| | - Frank G. Keller
- Department of Pediatrics, Aflac Cancer and Blood Disorders Center, Children's Healthcare of Atlanta and Emory University, Atlanta, GA
| | - Kara M. Kelly
- Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY
| | - Ralph M. Meyer
- Juravinski Hospital and Cancer Centre, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
40
|
Parsons SK, Rodday AM, Scharman C, André M, Federico M, Friedberg JW, Friedman DL, Gallamini A, Hay AE, Hoskin P, Johnson P, Kahl BS, Keller FG, Kelly KM, Meyer RM, Radford JA, Raemaekers J, Zinzani PL, Cohen JT, Evens AM. The Hodgkin lymphoma international study for individual care (HoLISTIC): Enhancing decision making in pediatric and adult Hodgkin lymphoma (HL). J Clin Oncol 2020. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2020.38.15_suppl.e20019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
e20019 Background: Decision making in HL is complicated by clinical trial results that differ, a growing range of treatment options, and the absence of ideal, objective information on long term outcomes from modern therapy. Methods: We formed an international consortium, HoLISTIC, consisting of 50+ pediatric & adult HL providers, decision scientists, statisticians, epidemiologists, and patient (pt) advocates and are creating a data repository of individual pt data (IPD) from 16 contemporary, pediatric & adult clinical trials for newly diagnosed pts with HL, and 6 large HL registries/survivorship cohorts, the latter enriched with LE data (Table). We will enhance our prior decision model (DM) from group-level data (Parsons S et al. B J Haem 2018) to establish a dynamic HL DM from IPD. Using statistical and simulation modeling of IPD, the enhanced DM will project outcomes of interest, including quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), reflecting both mortality and morbidity. Results will be validated and calibrated against prominent external cohorts (e.g., St. Jude LIFE Cohort, Dutch HL registry). The DM then will be converted to a web-based platform that we will test and evaluate among HL providers and pts at the point of care. Results: To date, we have harmonized IPD from 10 trials (~8,000 HL pts), ranging in size from 165-1925 pts. At diagnosis, median age was 26 y (IQR 18-38); 51.5% were male. 43% had B symptoms, 34% had mediastinal bulk, and 79% had nodular sclerosis histology. Median follow up was 5.0 y (IQR 3.5-7.4). IPD harmonization is ongoing, which will be followed by creation of the enhanced DM. Conclusions: HoLISTIC capitalizes on a multidisciplinary pediatric & adult oncology collaborative, harmonizing extensive IPD by linking data from clinical trials and real world registries/survivorship cohorts. This work will inform questions about the influence of Tx options on both acute and potential long term events and how those options align with pt values and preferences. [Table: see text]
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Marc André
- Université Catholique de Louvain, CHU UCL Namur, Department of Hematology, Yvoir, Belgium
| | - Massimo Federico
- Dept of Diagnostic, Clinical and Public Health Medicine, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | | | - Debra L. Friedman
- Vanderbilt University Medical Center/Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, TN
| | | | - Annette E. Hay
- Canadian Cancer Trials Group, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | - Peter Hoskin
- Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, London, United Kingdom
| | - Peter Johnson
- Cancer Research UK Centre, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | - Brad S. Kahl
- University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center, Madison, WI
| | - Frank G. Keller
- Department of Pediatrics, Aflac Cancer and Blood Disorders Center, Children's Healthcare of Atlanta and Emory University, Atlanta, GA
| | - Kara M. Kelly
- Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY
| | - Ralph M. Meyer
- Juravinski Hospital and Cancer Centre, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - John A. Radford
- Christie Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | | | - Pier Luigi Zinzani
- Institute of Hematology Seràgnoli, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
41
|
Abstract
This study uses US commercial health plan insurance data to characterize coverage for biosimilar drugs compared with reference products.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James D. Chambers
- Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Rachel C. Lai
- Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Nikoletta M. Margaretos
- Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Ari D. Panzer
- Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Joshua T. Cohen
- Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Peter J. Neumann
- Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Leech AA, Neumann PJ, Cohen JT, Jagasia M, Dusetzina SB. Balancing Value with Affordability: Cell Immunotherapy for Cancer Treatment in the U.S. Oncologist 2020; 25:e1117-e1119. [PMID: 32386072 DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2020-0025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2020] [Accepted: 04/15/2020] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Despite the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services' recent approval to increase payments for inpatient-delivered chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy (CAR-T) for adult lymphoma, reimbursement remains far below the costs of the product and overall treatment of the therapy. We surveyed 92 CAR-T-certified centers in the U.S. to assess the perceived financial viability and related challenges for treating adult patients with lymphoma. Of 92 certified CAR-T centers in the U.S., 20 (22%) directors or chief medical officers responded. More than three quarters of facilities reported treating patients in an inpatient setting, and 60% reported that the majority of their patients were covered under commercial/private insurance. The financial viability rating across centers (median: 62; interquartile range: 48-69; scale 1-100) signals that economic sustainability of institutional programs for adult lymphoma is a concern. These dynamics may limit access to CAR-T for Medicare beneficiaries and lead to greater outpatient use of the therapy, which may limit access for medically complex patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ashley A Leech
- Department of Health Policy, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Peter J Neumann
- Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health, Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Joshua T Cohen
- Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health, Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Madan Jagasia
- Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Stacie B Dusetzina
- Department of Health Policy, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
- Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Olchanski N, Vest AR, Cohen JT, DeNofrio D. Two-year outcomes and cost for heart failure patients following discharge from the hospital after an acute heart failure admission. Int J Cardiol 2020; 307:109-113. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2019.10.033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2019] [Revised: 10/13/2019] [Accepted: 10/18/2019] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
|
44
|
Eldar-Lissai A, Cohen JT, Meltzer-Brody S, Gerbasi ME, Chertavian E, Hodgkins P, Bond JC, Johnson SJ. Cost-Effectiveness of Brexanolone Versus Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors for the Treatment of Postpartum Depression in the United States. J Manag Care Spec Pharm 2020; 26:627-638. [PMID: 32191592 PMCID: PMC10391201 DOI: 10.18553/jmcp.2020.19306] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Brexanolone injection (BRX) was approved by the FDA in 2019 for the treatment of adult patients with postpartum depression (PPD), but its cost-effectiveness has not yet been evaluated. OBJECTIVE To estimate the cost-effectiveness of BRX compared with treatment with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) for PPD. METHODS We projected costs (2018 U.S. dollars) and health (quality-adjusted life-years [QALYs]) for mothers treated with BRX or SSRIs and their children. A health state transition model projected clinical and economic outcomes for mothers based on the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale, from a U.S. payer perspective. The modeled population consisted of adult patients with moderate to severe PPD, similar to BRX clinical trial patients. Short-term efficacy for BRX and SSRIs came from an indirect treatment comparison. Long-term efficacy outcomes over 4 weeks, 11 years (base case), and 18 years were based on results from an 18-year longitudinal study. Maternal health utility values came from analysis of trial-based short-form 6D responses. Other inputs were derived from the literature. RESULTS The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio for BRX versus SSRIs was $106,662 per QALY gained over an 11-year time horizon. Drug and administration costs for BRX averaged $38,501, compared with $25 for SSRIs over the studied time horizon. Maternal total direct medical costs averaged $65,908 in the BRX arm, compared with $73,653 in the SSRI arm. BRX-treated women averaged 6.230 QALYs compared with 5.979 QALYs for the SSRI arm. Adding partner costs and utilities in a sensitivity analysis further favored BRX. Results were sensitive to the severity of PPD at baseline and the model time horizon. Probabilistic sensitivity analyses indicated that BRX was cost-effective at the $150,000-per-QALY threshold with 58% probability. CONCLUSIONS Analysis using a state transition model showed BRX to be a cost-effective therapy compared with SSRIs for treating women with PPD. DISCLOSURES This study was funded by Sage Therapeutics, Cambridge, MA. Eldar-Lissai, Gerbasi, and Hodgkins are employees of Sage Therapeutics and own stock or stock options in the company. Gerbasi also reports previous employment with Policy Analysis Inc. Cohen contributed to this work as an independent consultant. Meltzer-Brody has a sponsored clinical research agreement with Sage Therapeutics to the University of North Carolina, as well as a sponsored research agreement from Janssen to the University of North Carolina, unrelated to this work. Meltzer-Brody has also received personal consulting fees from Cala Health and MedScape, unrelated to this work. Johnson, Chertavian, and Bond are employees of Medicus Economics, which was paid fees by Sage to conduct the research for this study. Study findings do not necessarily represent the views of CEVR or Tufts Medical Center.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Joshua T. Cohen
- Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health (CEVR), Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
45
|
Lin PJ, Emerson J, Faul JD, Cohen JT, Neumann PJ, Fillit HM, Daly AT, Margaretos N, Freund KM. Racial and Ethnic Differences in Knowledge About One's Dementia Status. J Am Geriatr Soc 2020; 68:1763-1770. [PMID: 32282058 DOI: 10.1111/jgs.16442] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2019] [Revised: 03/02/2020] [Accepted: 03/09/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To examine racial and ethnic differences in knowledge about one's dementia status. DESIGN Prospective cohort study. SETTING The 2000 to 2014 Health and Retirement Study. PARTICIPANTS Our sample included 8,686 person-wave observations representing 4,065 unique survey participants, aged 70 years or older, with dementia, as identified by a well-validated statistical prediction model based on individual demographic and clinical characteristics. MEASUREMENTS Primary outcome measure was knowledge of one's dementia status, as reported in the survey. Patient characteristics included race/ethnicity, age, sex, survey year, cognition, function, comorbidity, and whether living in a nursing home. RESULTS Among subjects identified as having dementia by the prediction model, 43.5% to 50.2%, depending on the survey year, reported that they were informed of the dementia status by their physician. This proportion was lower among Hispanics (25.9%-42.2%) and non-Hispanic blacks (31.4%-50.5%) than among non-Hispanic whites (47.7%-52.9%). Our fully adjusted regression model indicated lower dementia awareness among non-Hispanic blacks (odds ratio [OR] = 0.74; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.58-0.94) and Hispanics (OR = 0.60; 95% CI = 0.43-0.85), compared to non-Hispanic whites. Having more instrumental activity of daily living limitations (OR = 1.65; 95% CI = 1.56-1.75) and living in a nursing home (OR = 2.78; 95% CI = 2.32-3.32) were associated with increased odds of subjects reporting being told about dementia by a physician. CONCLUSION Less than half of individuals with dementia reported being told by a physician about the condition. A higher proportion of non-Hispanic blacks and Hispanics with dementia may be unaware of their condition, despite higher dementia prevalence in these groups, compared to non-Hispanic whites. Dementia outreach programs should target diverse communities with disproportionately high disease prevalence and low awareness. J Am Geriatr Soc 68:1763-1770, 2020.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pei-Jung Lin
- Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health, Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Joanna Emerson
- Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health, Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Jessica D Faul
- Survey Research Center, Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Joshua T Cohen
- Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health, Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Peter J Neumann
- Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health, Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Howard M Fillit
- Alzheimer's Drug Discovery Foundation, New York, New York, USA
| | - Allan T Daly
- Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health, Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Nikoletta Margaretos
- Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health, Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Karen M Freund
- Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center and Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Leech AA, Kim DD, Cohen JT, Neumann PJ. Are low and middle-income countries prioritising high-value healthcare interventions? BMJ Glob Health 2020; 5:e001850. [PMID: 32133187 PMCID: PMC7042606 DOI: 10.1136/bmjgh-2019-001850] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2019] [Revised: 12/13/2019] [Accepted: 12/22/2019] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Since resources are finite, investing in services that produce the highest health gain 'return on investment' is critical. We assessed the extent to which low and middle-income countries (LMIC) have included cost-saving interventions in their national strategic health plans. Methods We used the Tufts Medical Center Global Health Cost-Effectiveness Analysis Registry, an open-source database of English-language cost-per-disability-adjusted life year (DALY) studies, to identify analyses published in the last 10 years (2008-2017) of cost-saving health interventions in LMICs. To assess whether countries prioritised cost-saving interventions within their latest national health strategic plans, we identified 10 countries, all in sub-Saharan Africa, with the highest measures on the global burden of disease scale and reviewed their national health priority plans. Results We identified 392 studies (63%) targeting LMICs that reported 3315 cost-per-DALY ratios, of which 207 ratios (6%) represented interventions reported to be cost saving. Over half (53%) of these targeted sub-Saharan Africa. For the 10 countries we investigated in sub-Saharan Africa, 58% (79/137) of cost-saving interventions correspond with priorities identified in country plans. Alignment ranged from 95% (21/22 prioritised cost-saving ratios) in South Africa to 17% (2/12 prioritised cost-saving ratios) in Cameroon. Human papillomavirus vaccination was a noted priority in 70% (7/10) of national health prioritisation plans, while 40% (4/10) of countries explicitly included prenatal serological screening for syphilis. HIV prevention and treatment were stated priorities in most country health plans, whereas 40% (2/5) of countries principally outlined efforts for lymphatic filariasis. From our sample of 45 unique interventions, 36% of interventions (16/45) included costs associated directly with the implementation of the intervention. Conclusion Our findings indicate substantial variation across country and disease area in incorporating economic evidence into national health priority plans in a sample of sub-Saharan African countries. To make health economic data more salient, the authors of cost-effectiveness analyses must do more to reflect implementation costs and other factors that could limit healthcare delivery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ashley A Leech
- Department of Health Policy, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
- Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health, Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - David D Kim
- Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health, Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Joshua T Cohen
- Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health, Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Peter J Neumann
- Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health, Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Affiliation(s)
- John B Wong
- Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts (J.B.W., J.T.C.)
| | - Joshua T Cohen
- Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts (J.B.W., J.T.C.)
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Cohen JT, Silver MC, Ollendorf DA, Neumann PJ. Does the Institute for Clinical and Economic Review Revise Its Findings in Response to Industry Comments? Value Health 2019; 22:1396-1401. [PMID: 31806196 DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2019.08.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2019] [Revised: 08/07/2019] [Accepted: 08/12/2019] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Institute for Clinical and Economic Review (ICER) has gained prominance through its work conducting health technology assessments of pharmaceuticals in the United States. OBJECTIVE To understand the influence of industry comments on pharmaceutical value assessments conducted by ICER. METHODS We reviewed 15 ICER reports issued from 2017 through 2019. We quantified ICER's revisions to its cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) estimates between release of its draft and revised evidence reports and whether ratios shifted across ICER-specified categories of high, intermediate, or low value. We also reviewed industry-submitted comments recommending revision to ICER's CEAs, noting ICER's response as no change, text revised, assumption(s) revised, or conclusion revised. We evaluated each comment in terms of clarity, whether it offered an alternative to ICER's approach, and whether it characterized the expected impact of revision on ICER's analysis. RESULTS We identified 53 ICER-reported ratios. Of these, 45 (84.9%) changed between the draft and revised report, but 26 changes (57.8%) were small (<10%). Six ratios shifted across value categories. We identified 256 industry comments recommending that ICER revise its CEA. Of these, 159 (62%) lacked clarity, 145 (57%) offered no alternative, and 243 (95%) did not characterize their impact on ICER's estimated ratio. Ninety-one comments (35.5%) caused ICER to revise its assumptions, but only 5 (2.0%) caused ICER to revise its conclusions. Four of these 5 comments characterized their impact on ICER's findings. CONCLUSIONS Changes in ICER's estimates of cost-effectiveness between its draft and revised evidence reports are generally modest. Greater precision in industry comments could increase the influence of industry critiques, thus enhancing the dialogue around pharmaceutical value.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joshua T Cohen
- Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health, Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.
| | - Madison C Silver
- Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health, Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Daniel A Ollendorf
- Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health, Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Peter J Neumann
- Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health, Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Emerson J, Bacon R, Kent A, Neumann PJ, Cohen JT. Publication of Decision Model Source Code: Attitudes of Health Economics Authors. Pharmacoeconomics 2019; 37:1409-1410. [PMID: 31065916 PMCID: PMC6860460 DOI: 10.1007/s40273-019-00796-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Joanna Emerson
- Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health, Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, 02111, USA
| | - Rachel Bacon
- Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health, Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, 02111, USA
| | - Alma Kent
- Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health, Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, 02111, USA
| | - Peter J Neumann
- Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health, Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, 02111, USA
| | - Joshua T Cohen
- Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health, Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, 02111, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Emerson J, Bacon R, Kent A, Neumann PJ, Cohen JT. Correction to: Publication of Decision Model Source Code: Attitudes of Health Economics Authors. Pharmacoeconomics 2019; 37:1411. [PMID: 31214898 PMCID: PMC6860459 DOI: 10.1007/s40273-019-00813-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
The article Artificial recharge of a shallow hard rock aquiferas a climate change mitigation method.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joanna Emerson
- Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health, Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, 02111, USA
| | - Rachel Bacon
- Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health, Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, 02111, USA
| | - Alma Kent
- Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health, Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, 02111, USA
| | - Peter J Neumann
- Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health, Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, 02111, USA
| | - Joshua T Cohen
- Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health, Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, 02111, USA.
| |
Collapse
|