1
|
Bornstein NM, Saver JL, Diener HC, Gorelick PB, Shuaib A, Solberg Y, Devlin T, Leung T, Molina CA, Skoloudik D, Fiksa J, Krieger D, Andersen G, Berrouschot J, Hobohm C, Schneider D, Griewing B, Endres M, Hausler KG, Kimmig H, Ringleb P, Weimar C, Schilling M, Kohrmann M, Hetzel A, Kaps M, Cheung R, Sobolewski P, Nyke W, Czlonkowska A, Stepien A, Waldemar B, Słowik A, Zbigniewem S, Lubiński I, Portela P, Segure T, Marti-Fabregas J, Alonso M, Nunez A, Miguel MB, Campello A, Arenillas J, Marshall N, Chiu D, Shownkeen H, Rymer M, Sen S, Roubec M, Kuliha M, Lakomý C, Tyl D, Kemlink D, Doležal O, Rekova P, Krejčí V, Christensen A, Belhage B, Maschmann C, Kruse Larsen C, Pott F, Christensen H, Marstrand J, Nielsen JK, Meden P, Prytz S, Rosenbaum S, Hedemann Sorensen JC, Stenhoj Meier K, Schmift Ettrup K, Dupont Hougaard K, Von Wietzel P, Stoll A, Schwetlick H, Pradel H, Hemprich A, Schulz A, Frerich B, Hobohm C, Weise C, Michalski D, Schaller F, Schiefke F, Helmrich J, Pelz J, Schnieder M, Schneider M, Matzen P, Langos R, Müller-Duerwald S, Lukhaup S, Bauer U, Kloppig W, Hiermann E, Mucha G, Soda H, Weinhardt R, Mucha T, Ziegler V, Abbushi A, Hotter B, Winter B, Anthofer B, Noack C, Laubisch D, Heldge Schneider G, Jan Jungehulsing G, Mueller H, Dreier J, Fiebach J, Flechsenhar J, Villringer K, Ebinger M, Rozanski M, Vajkoczy P, Klingebiel R, Steinicke R, Pittl S, Hoffmann S, Maul S, Krause T, Liman T, Plath T, Nowe T, Schmidt W, Fritzsch C, Haas C, Will HG, Haußmann-Betz K, Bayat M, Pordzik T, Hug A, Staff CJ, Lichy C, Eggers G, Kloss M, Bendszus M, Herrmann O, Seeberger R, Schwarting S, Rhode S, Rizos T, Hacke W, Frank B, Bozkurt B, Holle D, Mueller D, Koch D, Shanib H, Sudendey J, Brenck J, Busch K, Gartzen K, Gasser T, Hagenacker T, Buerke B, Prigge G, Minnerup J, Albers J, Wermker K, Schwindt W, Kallmünzer RB, Hauer E, Breuer L, Schellinger P, Kollmar R, Sauer R, Schwab S, Struffert T, Funfack A, Stechmann A, Schlaeger A, Laeppchen C, Schuchardt F, Klingler JH, Reis J, Lambeck J, Friedrich M, Laible M, Wellermeyer P, Beck S, Rutsch S, Niesen WD, Tanislav C, Schaaf H, Kerkmann H, Schirotzek I, Allendörfer J, Wolff S, Yuk-Lun Lau A, Yin Yan Chan A, Siu D, Wong EHC, Chu Wong GK, Leung H, Wong LK, Zhu XL, Yan Soo YO, Ting Tse AC, Kit Leung GK, Leung KM, Ngai Hung K, Wai Mei Kwan M, Man Yu Tse M, Tse P, Hon Chan P, Lee R, Shek Kwan Chang R, Yin Yu Pang S, Fong Kwong Hon S, Cheng TS, Lui WM, Wo Mak WW, Sobota A, Wiater B, Loch B, Wolak G, Łabudzka I, Dabal J, Grzesik M, Sledzinska M, Hatalska-Żerebiec R, Szczuchniak W, Gójska A, Nałęcz D, Gasecki D, Kozera G, Dylewicz Ł, Niekra M, Kwarciany M, Chomik P, Skowron P, Kobayashi A, Chabik G, Makowicz G, Bembenek J, Jędrzejewska J, Karlinski M, Czepiel W, Brodacki B, Staszewski J, Kosek J, Jadczak M, Durka-Kęsy M, Kaluzny K, Ziomek M, Fudala M, Sosnowski Z, Ferens A, Szczygieł E, Banaszkiewicz K, Ziomek M, Wnuk M, Szczepańska-Szerej A, Jach E, Maslanko GE, Wojczal J, Luchowski P, Kowalczyk A, Jakubiak J, Kopcewicz J, Gajda M, Wichlinska-Lubinska M, Rodriguez D, Santamarin E, Pagola J, Lorente Guerrero J, Ribo M, Rubiera M, Maisterra O, Pinero S, Catalina Iglesias V, Plans G, Quesada H, Aparicio Caballero MA, Portela PC, De Diego AB, Garay DS, García Rodriguez MR, Martin OA, Braña SC, Garcia J, Hernandez FM, Catala I, Marti-Vilalta JL, Delgado Mederos R, de Quintana SC, Martinez-Ramirez S, Valcarcel Gonzalez J, Masjuan Vallejo J, Diamantopoulus J, Del Alamo M, Poveda PD, Pastor AG, Carballal CF, Diaz F, Garcia Leal R, Juretschke R, Echabe EA, Sanchez JC, Yanez MR, Garcia RS, Muino RL, Rivas SA, Lopez Gonzalez DM, Cuadrado E, Giralt E, Villalba G, Roquer J, Angel O, Jimenez M, Cedeño RR, Salinas R, Lejarreta S, Silva Y, Fraile A, Calleja A, Cepeda Landínez GA, Tellez N, Garcia Bermejo P, Santos PJ, Herranz RF, Hunt P, Browning D, Violette M, Hoddeson R, Rose J, Zhang J, Mazumdar A, Echiverri H, Chow J, Lovick D, Coleman M, Akhtar N, Sugg R, Zanation A, Germanwala A, Senior B, Huang D, Aucutt-Walter N, Kasner S, LeRoux P, von Kummer R, Palesch Y. Sphenopalatine Ganglion Stimulation to Augment Cerebral Blood Flow. Stroke 2019; 50:2108-2117. [DOI: 10.1161/strokeaha.118.024582] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Background and Purpose—
Many patients with acute ischemic stroke are not eligible for thrombolysis or mechanical reperfusion therapies due to contraindications, inaccessible vascular occlusions, late presentation, or large infarct core. Sphenopalatine ganglion (SPG) stimulation to enhance collateral flow and stabilize the blood-brain barrier offers an alternative, potentially more widely deliverable, therapy.
Methods—
In a randomized, sham-controlled, double-masked trial at 41 centers in 7 countries, patients with anterior circulation ischemic stroke not treated with reperfusion therapies within 24 hours of onset were randomly allocated to active SPG stimulation or sham control. The primary efficacy outcome was improvement beyond expectations on the modified Rankin Scale of global disability at 90 days (sliding dichotomy), assessed in the modified intention-to-treat population. The initial planned sample size was 660 patients, but the trial was stopped early when technical improvements in device placement occurred, so that analysis of accumulated experience could be conducted to inform a successor trial.
Results—
Among 303 enrolled patients, 253 received at least one active SPG or sham stimulation, constituting the modified intention-to-treat population (153 SPG stimulation and 100 sham control). Age was median 73 years (interquartile range, 64–79), 52.6% were female, deficit severity on the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale was median 11 (interquartile range, 9–15), and time from last known well median 18.6 hours (interquartile range, 14.5–22.5). For the primary outcome, improved 3-month disability beyond expectations, rates in the SPG versus sham treatment groups were 49.7% versus 40.0%; odds ratio, 1.48 (95% CI, 0.89–2.47);
P
=0.13. A significant treatment interaction with stroke location (cortical versus noncortical) was noted,
P
=0.04. In the 87 patients with confirmed cortical involvement, rates of improvement beyond expectations were 50.0% versus 27.0%; odds ratio, 2.70 (95% CI, 1.08–6.73);
P
=0.03. Similar response patterns were observed for all prespecified secondary efficacy outcomes. No differences in mortality or serious adverse event safety end points were observed.
Conclusions—
SPG stimulation within 24 hours of onset is safe in acute ischemic stroke. SPG stimulation was not shown to statistically significantly improve 3-month disability above expectations, though favorable outcomes were nominally higher with SPG stimulation. Beneficial effects may distinctively be conferred in patients with confirmed cortical involvement. The results of this study need to be confirmed in a larger pivotal study.
Clinical Trial Registration—
URL:
https://www.clinicaltrials.gov
. Unique identifier: NCT03767192.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natan M. Bornstein
- From the Brain Division, Shaarei Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem and Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical School, Tel Aviv University (N.M.B.)
| | - Jeffrey L. Saver
- Department of Neurology and Comprehensive Stroke Center, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles CA (J.L.S.)
| | | | - Philip B. Gorelick
- Davee Department of Neurology, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL (P.B.G.)
| | - Ashfaq Shuaib
- Department of Medicine (Neurology), University of Alberta, Edmonton (A.S.)
| | | | - Thomas Devlin
- Department of Neurology, University of Tennessee College of Medicine, Chattanooga (T.D.)
| | - Thomas Leung
- Division of Neurology, Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, The Chinese University of Hong Kong (T.L.)
| | - Carlos A. Molina
- and Stroke Unit, Department of Neurology, Vall d’Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona (C.A.M.)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Koren JP, Herta J, Fürbass F, Pirker S, Reiner-Deitemyer V, Riederer F, Flechsenhar J, Hartmann M, Kluge T, Baumgartner C. Automated Long-Term EEG Review: Fast and Precise Analysis in Critical Care Patients. Front Neurol 2018; 9:454. [PMID: 29973906 PMCID: PMC6020775 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2018.00454] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2018] [Accepted: 05/29/2018] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Ongoing or recurrent seizure activity without prominent motor features is a common burden in neurological critical care patients and people with epilepsy during ICU stays. Continuous EEG (CEEG) is the gold standard for detecting ongoing ictal EEG patterns and monitoring functional brain activity. However CEEG review is very demanding and time consuming. The purpose of the present multirater, EEG expert reviewer study, is to test and assess the clinical feasibility of an automatic EEG pattern detection method (Neurotrend). Methods: Four board certified EEG reviewers used Neurotrend to annotate 76 CEEG datasets à 6 h (in total 456 h of EEG) for rhythmic and periodic EEG patterns (RPP), unequivocal ictal EEG patterns and burst suppression. All reviewers had a predefined time limit of 5 min (± 2 min) per CEEG dataset and were compared to a predefined gold standard (conventional EEG review with unlimited time). Subanalysis of specific features of RPP was conducted as well. We used Gwet's AC1 and AC2 coefficients to calculate interrater agreement (IRA) and multirater agreement (MRA). Also, we determined individual performance measures for unequivocal ictal EEG patterns and burst suppression. Bonferroni-Holmes correction for multiple testing was applied to all statistical tests. Results: Mean review time was 3.3 min (± 1.9 min) per CEEG dataset. We found substantial IRA for unequivocal ictal EEG patterns (0.61–0.79; mean sensitivity 86.8%; mean specificity 82.2%, p < 0.001) and burst suppression (0.68–0.71; mean sensitivity 96.7%; mean specificity 76.9% p < 0.001). Two reviewers showed substantial IRA for RPP (0.68–0.72), whereas the other two showed moderate agreement (0.45–0.54), compared to the gold standard (p < 0.001). MRA showed almost perfect agreement for burst suppression (0.86) and moderate agreement for RPP (0.54) and unequivocal ictal EEG patterns (0.57). Conclusions: We demonstrated the clinical feasibility of an automatic critical care EEG pattern detection method on two levels: (1) reasonable high agreement compared to the gold standard, (2) reasonable short review times compared to previously reported EEG review times with conventional EEG analysis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Johannes P Koren
- Karl Landsteiner Institute for Clinical Epilepsy Research and Cognitive Neurology, Vienna, Austria.,Department of Neurology, General Hospital Hietzing With Neurological Center Rosenhügel, Vienna, Austria
| | - Johannes Herta
- Department of Neurosurgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Franz Fürbass
- Center for Health and Bioresources, AIT Austrian Institute of Technology GmbH, Vienna, Austria
| | - Susanne Pirker
- Karl Landsteiner Institute for Clinical Epilepsy Research and Cognitive Neurology, Vienna, Austria.,Department of Neurology, General Hospital Hietzing With Neurological Center Rosenhügel, Vienna, Austria
| | - Veronika Reiner-Deitemyer
- Department of Neurology, General Hospital Hietzing With Neurological Center Rosenhügel, Vienna, Austria
| | - Franz Riederer
- Karl Landsteiner Institute for Clinical Epilepsy Research and Cognitive Neurology, Vienna, Austria.,Department of Neurology, General Hospital Hietzing With Neurological Center Rosenhügel, Vienna, Austria
| | - Julia Flechsenhar
- Department of Neurology, General Hospital Hietzing With Neurological Center Rosenhügel, Vienna, Austria.,Epilepsie-Zentrum Berlin-Brandenburg, Ev. Krankenhaus Königin Elisabeth Herzberge, Berlin, Germany
| | - Manfred Hartmann
- Center for Health and Bioresources, AIT Austrian Institute of Technology GmbH, Vienna, Austria
| | - Tilmann Kluge
- Center for Health and Bioresources, AIT Austrian Institute of Technology GmbH, Vienna, Austria
| | - Christoph Baumgartner
- Karl Landsteiner Institute for Clinical Epilepsy Research and Cognitive Neurology, Vienna, Austria.,Department of Neurology, General Hospital Hietzing With Neurological Center Rosenhügel, Vienna, Austria.,Medical Faculty, Sigmund Freud University, Vienna, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kowoll CM, Kaminski J, Weiß V, Bösel J, Dietrich W, Jüttler E, Flechsenhar J, Guenther A, Huttner HB, Niesen WD, Pfefferkorn T, Schirotzek I, Schneider H, Liebig T, Dohmen C. Severe Cerebral Venous and Sinus Thrombosis: Clinical Course, Imaging Correlates, and Prognosis. Neurocrit Care 2017; 25:392-399. [PMID: 27000641 DOI: 10.1007/s12028-016-0256-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Severe cerebral venous-sinus thrombosis (CVT) is a rare disease, and its clinical course, imaging correlates, as well as long-term prognosis have not yet been investigated systematically. METHODS Multicenter retrospective study. Inclusion criteria were CVT, Glasgow coma scale ≤9, and treatment in the intensive care unit. Primary outcome was death or dependency, assessed by a modified Rankin Score (mRS) >2 at last follow-up. RESULTS 114 patients were included. At last follow-up (median 2.5 years), 38 patients (33.3 %) showed no or minor residual symptoms (mRS = 0 or 1), 12 (10.5 %) had a mild (mRS = 2), 13 (11.4 %) a moderate (mRS = 3), 12 (10.5 %) a severe disability (mRS = 4 or 5), and 39 (34.2 %) had died. In bivariate analysis, predictors of poor outcome were any signs of mass effect on imaging, clinical deterioration after admission, and age. In contrast, clinical symptoms on admission and parenchymal lesions per se, such as edema, infarction, or hemorrhage were not predictive. Multivariate predictors of poor outcome were an increase in National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale ≥3 after admission [odds ratio (OR) 6.7], bilateral motor signs in the further course (OR 9.2), and midline shift (OR 5.1). CONCLUSION The outcome of severe CVT is almost equally divided between severe impairment or death and survival with no or only mild handicap. Specifically, space-occupying mass effect and associated neurologic deterioration seem to determine a poor outcome. Therefore, early detection and treatment of mass effect should be the focus of critical care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christina M Kowoll
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Cologne, Kerpener Straße 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany
| | - Julia Kaminski
- Department of Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Cologne, Kerpener Straße 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany
| | - Verena Weiß
- Institute of Medical Statistics, Informatics and Epidemiology, University of Cologne, Kerpener Straße 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany
| | - Julian Bösel
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Wenke Dietrich
- Department of Neurology, Nuremburg Hospital, Breslauer Str. 201, 90471, Nuremberg, Germany
| | - Eric Jüttler
- Department of Neurology, Ostalb Hospital, Im Kälblesrain 1, 73430, Aalen, Germany
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Charité, Center for Stroke Research, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany
| | - Julia Flechsenhar
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Charité, Center for Stroke Research, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany
| | - Albrecht Guenther
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Jena, Erlanger Allee 101, 07747, Jena, Germany
| | - Hagen B Huttner
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Erlangen, Schwabachanlage 6, 91054, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Wolf-Dirk Niesen
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Freiburg, Breisacher Str. 64, 79106, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Thomas Pfefferkorn
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Munich (LMU), Marchioninistraße 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Ingo Schirotzek
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Giessen, Klinikstr. 33, 35385, Giessen, Germany
| | - Hauke Schneider
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Dresden, Fetscherstr. 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany
| | - Thomas Liebig
- Department of Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Cologne, Kerpener Straße 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany
- Institute of Neuroradiology, University Hospital Charité, Berlin, Germany
| | - Christian Dohmen
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Cologne, Kerpener Straße 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany.
- Max Planck Institute for Metabolism Research, Cologne, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Kuramatsu JB, Gerner ST, Schellinger PD, Glahn J, Endres M, Sobesky J, Flechsenhar J, Neugebauer H, Jüttler E, Grau A, Palm F, Röther J, Michels P, Hamann GF, Hüwel J, Hagemann G, Barber B, Terborg C, Trostdorf F, Bäzner H, Roth A, Wöhrle J, Keller M, Schwarz M, Reimann G, Volkmann J, Müllges W, Kraft P, Classen J, Hobohm C, Horn M, Milewski A, Reichmann H, Schneider H, Schimmel E, Fink GR, Dohmen C, Stetefeld H, Witte O, Günther A, Neumann-Haefelin T, Racs AE, Nueckel M, Erbguth F, Kloska SP, Dörfler A, Köhrmann M, Schwab S, Huttner HB. Anticoagulant reversal, blood pressure levels, and anticoagulant resumption in patients with anticoagulation-related intracerebral hemorrhage. JAMA 2015; 313:824-36. [PMID: 25710659 DOI: 10.1001/jama.2015.0846] [Citation(s) in RCA: 365] [Impact Index Per Article: 40.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Although use of oral anticoagulants (OACs) is increasing, there is a substantial lack of data on how to treat OAC-associated intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH). OBJECTIVE To assess the association of anticoagulation reversal and blood pressure (BP) with hematoma enlargement and the effects of OAC resumption. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Retrospective cohort study at 19 German tertiary care centers (2006-2012) including 1176 individuals for analysis of long-term functional outcome, 853 for analysis of hematoma enlargement, and 719 for analysis of OAC resumption. EXPOSURES Reversal of anticoagulation during acute phase, systolic BP at 4 hours, and reinitiation of OAC for long-term treatment. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Frequency of hematoma enlargement in relation to international normalized ratio (INR) and BP. Incidence analysis of ischemic and hemorrhagic events with or without OAC resumption. Factors associated with favorable (modified Rankin Scale score, 0-3) vs unfavorable functional outcome. RESULTS Hemorrhage enlargement occurred in 307 of 853 patients (36.0%). Reduced rates of hematoma enlargement were associated with reversal of INR levels <1.3 within 4 hours after admission (43/217 [19.8%]) vs INR of ≥1.3 (264/636 [41.5%]; P < .001) and systolic BP <160 mm Hg at 4 hours (167/504 [33.1%]) vs ≥160 mm Hg (98/187 [52.4%]; P < .001). The combination of INR reversal <1.3 within 4 hours and systolic BP of <160 mm Hg at 4 hours was associated with lower rates of hematoma enlargement (35/193 [18.1%] vs 220/498 [44.2%] not achieving these values; OR, 0.28; 95% CI, 0.19-0.42; P < .001) and lower rates of in-hospital mortality (26/193 [13.5%] vs 103/498 [20.7%]; OR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.37-0.95; P = .03). OAC was resumed in 172 of 719 survivors (23.9%). OAC resumption showed fewer ischemic complications (OAC: 9/172 [5.2%] vs no OAC: 82/547 [15.0%]; P < .001) and not significantly different hemorrhagic complications (OAC: 14/172 [8.1%] vs no OAC: 36/547 [6.6%]; P = .48). Propensity-matched survival analysis in patients with atrial fibrillation who restarted OAC showed a decreased HR of 0.258 (95% CI, 0.125-0.534; P < .001) for long-term mortality. Functional long-term outcome was unfavorable in 786 of 1083 patients (72.6%). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Among patients with OAC-associated ICH, reversal of INR <1.3 within 4 hours and systolic BP <160 mm Hg at 4 hours were associated with lower rates of hematoma enlargement, and resumption of OAC therapy was associated with lower risk of ischemic events. These findings require replication and assessment in prospective studies. TRIAL REGISTRATION clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01829581.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joji B Kuramatsu
- Department of Neurology, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Stefan T Gerner
- Department of Neurology, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Peter D Schellinger
- Department of Neurology and Neurogeriatry, Community Hospital Johannes Wesling Klinikum Minden, Minden, Germany
| | - Jörg Glahn
- Department of Neurology and Neurogeriatry, Community Hospital Johannes Wesling Klinikum Minden, Minden, Germany
| | - Matthias Endres
- Department of Neurology, University of Berlin-Charité, Berlin, Germany4Center for Stroke Research Berlin, Berlin, Germany5German Centre for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Berlin, Germany6German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Charité-Univer
| | - Jan Sobesky
- Department of Neurology, University of Berlin-Charité, Berlin, Germany
| | - Julia Flechsenhar
- Department of Neurology, University of Berlin-Charité, Berlin, Germany
| | - Hermann Neugebauer
- Department of Neurology, University of Berlin-Charité, Berlin, Germany7Department of Neurology, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Eric Jüttler
- Department of Neurology, University of Berlin-Charité, Berlin, Germany7Department of Neurology, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Armin Grau
- Department of Neurology, Community Hospital Klinikum der Stadt Ludwigshafen am Rhein, Ludwigshafen, Germany
| | - Frederick Palm
- Department of Neurology, Community Hospital Klinikum der Stadt Ludwigshafen am Rhein, Ludwigshafen, Germany
| | - Joachim Röther
- Department of Neurology, Community Hospital Asklepios Klinik Hamburg Altona, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Peter Michels
- Department of Neurology, Community Hospital Asklepios Klinik Hamburg Altona, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Gerhard F Hamann
- Department of Neurology, Community Hospital Dr Horst Schmidt Klinikum Wiesbaden, Wiesbaden, Germany
| | - Joachim Hüwel
- Department of Neurology, Community Hospital Dr Horst Schmidt Klinikum Wiesbaden, Wiesbaden, Germany
| | - Georg Hagemann
- Department of Neurology, Community Hospital Helios Klinikum Berlin-Buch, Berlin, Germany
| | - Beatrice Barber
- Department of Neurology, Community Hospital Helios Klinikum Berlin-Buch, Berlin, Germany
| | - Christoph Terborg
- Department of Neurology, Community Hospital Asklepios Klinik St Georg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Frank Trostdorf
- Department of Neurology, Community Hospital Asklepios Klinik St Georg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Hansjörg Bäzner
- Department of Neurology, Community Hospital Klinikum Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany
| | - Aletta Roth
- Department of Neurology, Community Hospital Klinikum Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany
| | - Johannes Wöhrle
- Department of Neurology, Community Hospital Klinikum Koblenz, Koblenz, Germany
| | - Moritz Keller
- Department of Neurology, Community Hospital Klinikum Koblenz, Koblenz, Germany
| | - Michael Schwarz
- Department of Neurology, Community Hospital Klinikum Dortmund, Dortmund, Germany
| | - Gernot Reimann
- Department of Neurology, Community Hospital Klinikum Dortmund, Dortmund, Germany
| | - Jens Volkmann
- Department of Neurology, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Wolfgang Müllges
- Department of Neurology, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Peter Kraft
- Department of Neurology, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany17Institute of Clinical Epidemiology and Biometry, Comprehensive Heart Failure Center, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Joseph Classen
- Department of Neurology, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Carsten Hobohm
- Department of Neurology, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Markus Horn
- Department of Neurology, Community Hospital Bad Hersfeld, Bad Hersfeld, Germany
| | - Angelika Milewski
- Department of Neurology, Community Hospital Bad Hersfeld, Bad Hersfeld, Germany
| | - Heinz Reichmann
- Department of Neurology, University of Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Hauke Schneider
- Department of Neurology, University of Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Eik Schimmel
- Department of Neurology, University of Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Gereon R Fink
- Department of Neurology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Christian Dohmen
- Department of Neurology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | | | - Otto Witte
- Department of Neurology, University of Jena, Jena, Germany
| | | | | | - Andras E Racs
- Department of Neurology, Community Hospital Fulda, Fulda, Germany
| | - Martin Nueckel
- Department of Neurology, Community Hospital Nuremberg, Nuremberg, Germany
| | - Frank Erbguth
- Department of Neurology, Community Hospital Nuremberg, Nuremberg, Germany
| | - Stephan P Kloska
- Department of Neuroradiology, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Arnd Dörfler
- Department of Neuroradiology, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Martin Köhrmann
- Department of Neurology, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Stefan Schwab
- Department of Neurology, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Hagen B Huttner
- Department of Neurology, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Witsch J, Neugebauer H, Flechsenhar J, Jüttler E. Hypoglycemic encephalopathy: a case series and literature review on outcome determination. J Neurol 2012; 259:2172-81. [PMID: 22491856 DOI: 10.1007/s00415-012-6480-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2011] [Revised: 02/19/2012] [Accepted: 03/12/2012] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
Data on clinical long-term outcome after the acute phase of hypoglycemic encephalopathy (HE) using validated outcome scales is currently unavailable. Here we report the results of a systematic literature search for studies on HE and data on long-term outcome in patients with HE admitted to three Charité hospitals between January 2005 and July 2010. HE was defined as coma/stupor and blood glucose levels <50 mg/dl on admission, persistence of coma/stupor for ≥24 h despite normalization of blood glucose levels, and exclusion of any other cause of coma/stupor. Outcome was assessed using the modified Rankin scale (mRS), Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS), and Barthel index (BI). Fifteen patients were included, with a mean age of 60 years (range 29-79). Two were lost to follow-up. Of the remaining 13 patients, six had died (46 %). In the seven survivors, the median mRS score was 0 (range 0-5), median GOS score was 5 (range 2-5), and median BI was 100 (range 0-100). MRIs made in the acute phase were available for three patients and revealed no obvious relation between lesion size or pattern and clinical outcome. To our knowledge, this is the first case series using validated clinical scoring systems to determine clinical long-term outcome after HE. The results suggest that mortality is high, but long-term survival with little or no disability is possible and can be observed in the majority of survivors. Risk of death or poor outcome does not seem to be related to MRI features in the acute phase but rather to other presumably medical factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jens Witsch
- Department of Neurology, Charité Campus Virchow Klinikum, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|