Breast and cervix cancer screening among multiethnic women: role of age, health, and source of care

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the relationships between age, health status, access to care, and breast and cervical cancer screening among multiethnic elderly and nonelderly women.

METHODS

A structured telephone survey of a quota sample of 1,420 New York City women from four Hispanic groups (Columbian, Dominican, Puerto Rican, Ecuadorian) and three black groups (U.S., Caribbean, and Haitian) was performed. Outcome measures included "ever" and "recent" self-reported use of mammography, clinical breast examination (CBE), and Pap smears. Logistic regression models assessed the predictors of screening use.

RESULTS

Having a regular source of care significantly predicted all screening use for both elderly and nonelderly, controlling for ethnicity, sociodemographics, health status, access to care, proportion of life in the United States, and cancer attitudes. Elderly women (>/=65 years) were significantly less likely to have ever had (OR = 0.79, 95% CI 0.65-0. 96) and to have recently had (OR = 0.67, 95% CI 0.57-0.79) Pap smears than younger women, controlling for the other variables; being elderly also tended to be an independent predictor of ever and recent mammography and CBE use. Interestingly, there was a trend for health status to act differently in predicting Pap smear use for the two age groups. For younger women, being in poor health increased the odds of Pap smear screening, while for elderly women, being in good health increased the odds of screening.

CONCLUSIONS

Elderly women reported being screened less than younger women; interactions between health status and age need further exploration.

The costs and effects of cervical and breast cancer screening in a public hospital emergency room. The Cancer Control Center of Harlem

OBJECTIVES

This study assessed the cost-effectiveness of cervix and breast cancer screening in a public hospital emergency room.

METHODS

Age-eligible women with nonurgent conditions and without recent screening were offered screening by a nurse. A decision analysis compared the costs and outcomes of emergency room screening and standard hospital screening efforts.

RESULTS

The undiscounted cost-effectiveness results for establishing new programs were $4050 (cervical cancer), $403,203 (breast cancer), and $4375 (joint cervix and breast cancer) per year of life saved. If screening is added to an existing program, results are more favorable ($429, $21,324, and $479 per year of life saved for cervix, breast, and joint screening, respectively). Results were most sensitive to volume and probability of receiving treatment after an abnormal screen.

CONCLUSIONS

Emergency room screening was cost-effective for cervical cancer; breast cancer screening was relatively expensive given the low number of women reached. More intensive recruitment and follow-up strategies are needed to maximize the cost-effectiveness of such programs.

Implementation of a breast and cervical cancer screening program in a public hospital emergency department. Cancer Control Center of Harlem

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To assess the feasibility and yields of screening for breast and cervical cancer in an urban public hospital emergency department.

METHODS

Women who presented to the ED of a large, urban public hospital during the study period with nonurgent conditions were eligible for a Papanicolaou test (Pap smear) and a clinical breast examination (CBE) if they were 18 years of age or older and for a mammogram if they were 40 years of age or older, provided they had not had the screening examination within the past year. The Pap smear and CBE were performed by a nurse, and mammography was scheduled for a later date. Women with gynecologic complaints were excluded.

RESULTS

On the basis of screening history, medical status, and age, 1,850 (32%) of the 5,830 women seen in the ER during the 23-month study period were eligible for both mammography and CBE, and 2,361 (41%) were eligible for Pap smears. Of these women, 116 (6%) completed mammography and CBE, and 644 (27%) received Pap smears. Among screened women, 10 (9%) and 20 (3%), respectively, had results that were suspicious or positive for breast or cervical cancer. Follow-up rates were low: 20% for breast screening and 50% for Pap smears. Among those receiving follow-up, 1 woman was found to have breast cancer and 8 were found to have cervical neoplasia.

CONCLUSION

ED cancer screening was feasible and yielded a high rate of cancer detection. Program efficiency was hampered by low volume and high numbers of patients lost to follow-up after abnormal screening results. Greater integration into the acute care setting and more intensive recruitment and follow-up strategies are needed to maximize the potential yield and cost effectiveness of such programs.

Barriers to follow-up of abnormal screening mammograms among low-income minority women. Cancer Control Center of Harlem

OBJECTIVE

To describe factors related to compliance diagnostic follow-up among minority women of low socioeconomic status with abnormal screening mammograms.

METHODS

A retrospective cross-sectional survey using a structured telephone interview. Three cancer screening clinics at an urban inner-city public hospital. All women with abnormal screening mammograms between September 1990 and January 1992 were eligible; women were interviewed in August 1992. Abnormal mammograms were those requiring specific, non-routine clinical follow-up; non-compliance was defined as delayed follow-up (four to six months after the date of the mammogram), or no follow-up at the time of interview (more than 6 months after abnormal).

RESULTS

Sixty-two of 442 screened women had abnormal results; the overall rate of non-compliance with follow-up was 50%. Among the 42 (68%) women who agreed to be interviewed, non-compliers were less likely to state that they had been told to receive follow-up than compliers (65% versus 100%; p = 0.008). Non-compliant women were less likely to have suspicious mammography interpretations (p = 0.05), and more likely to report barriers to follow-up, such as cost of lost wages and medical care, system barriers, or fears, than compliant women (61.9% versus 9%, p = 0.01). There were no differences between the two groups for age, education, insurance, source of care, family history, knowledge or attitudes.

CONCLUSIONS

These preliminary results suggest that follow-up of low income, minority women with abnormal screening mammograms could be enhanced by improved communication of results. Future studies should extend these findings with larger samples and in other settings and populations.

The structure of informal care: are there differences by race?

This study investigated whether there are race differences in the structure of informal caregiving networks. Data on 3,793 functionally impaired persons age 65 and over from the 1989 National Long-Term Care Survey were analyzed. The size of the total caregiver network and the unpaid network did not differ by race, but the likelihood of there being a non-immediate family member among unpaid caregivers was higher among disabled older blacks. These findings raise questions about whether race differences in nursing home utilization and paid long-term care services, documented in other studies, can be explained by differences in caregiving arrangements.