Estradiol enables cortisol to act directly upon the pituitary to suppress pituitary responsiveness to GnRH in sheep

We have shown that cortisol infusion reduced the luteinizing hormone (LH) response to fixed hourly GnRH injections in ovariectomized ewes treated with estradiol during the non-breeding season (pituitary-clamp model). In contrast, cortisol did not affect the response to 2 hourly invariant GnRH injections in hypothalamo-pituitary disconnected ovariectomized ewes during the breeding season. To understand the differing results in these animal models and to determine if cortisol can act directly at the pituitary to suppress responsiveness to GnRH, we investigated the importance of the frequency of GnRH stimulus, the presence of estradiol and stage of the circannual breeding season. In experiment 1, during the non-breeding season, ovariectomized ewes were treated with estradiol, and pulsatile LH secretion was restored with i.v. GnRH injections either hourly or 2 hourly in the presence or absence of exogenous cortisol. Experiments 2 and 3 were conducted in hypothalamo-pituitary disconnected ovariectomized ewes in which GnRH was injected i.v. every 2 h. Experiment 2 was conducted during the non-breeding season and saline or cortisol was infused for 30 h in a cross-over design. Experiment 3 was conducted during the non-breeding and breeding seasons and saline or cortisol was infused for 30 h in the absence and presence of estradiol using a cross-over design. Samples were taken from all animals to measure plasma LH. LH pulse amplitude was reduced by cortisol in the pituitary clamp model with no difference between the hourly and 2-hourly GnRH pulse mode. In the absence of estradiol, there was no effect of cortisol on LH pulse amplitude in GnRH-replaced ovariectomized hypothalamo-pituitary disconnected ewes in either season. The LH pulse amplitude was reduced in both seasons in experiment 3 when cortisol was infused during estradiol treatment. We conclude that the ability of cortisol to reduce LH secretion does not depend upon the frequency of GnRH stimulus and that estradiol enables cortisol to act directly on the pituitary of ovariectomized hypothalamo-pituitary disconnected ewes to suppress the responsiveness to GnRH; this effect occurs in the breeding and non-breeding seasons.

Effect of duration of infusion of stress-like concentrations of cortisol on follicular development and the preovulatory surge of LH in sheep

Stress-like levels of cortisol suppress follicular growth and development and block or delay the preovulatory surge of LH when cortisol is continuously administered during the late luteal and early follicular phases of the ovine oestrous cycle. We postulated that cortisol infusion of shorter duration would have a similar effect. To test this hypothesis the oestrous cycles of mature ewes were synchronized using progestin-treated vaginal pessaries. Ewes were randomly assigned to one of four treatment groups. Animals received cortisol (0.1mg/kg/h; n=8) or vehicle alone (n=8) beginning 5 days before, and continuing for 5 days after, pessary removal (PR). Additional groups received cortisol only during the 5 days period before (n=7), or the 5 days period after (n=8), PR. Continuous delivery of cortisol established stable serum concentrations of cortisol of 72.0+/-2.5ng/ml within 6h of initiation of infusion. Serum concentrations of oestradiol increased progressively during the period after PR in control animals receiving vehicle alone and the preovulatory surge of LH was evident in all control animals (eight of eight) 55.5+/-5.0h after PR. In contrast, follicular development and the preovulatory surge of LH were evident during the period of cortisol infusion in only one of eight animals receiving stress-like levels of cortisol over the entire 10-day infusion period. Similarly, neither follicular development nor surge-like secretion of LH were evident during the infusion period in animals (zero of eight) receiving cortisol during the 5-day period after PR. This cortisol-dependent suppression of ovarian activity in sheep receiving stress-like levels of cortisol during the 5 days after PR was temporary and follicular development, the ovulatory surge of LH, and subsequent luteal function were evident in six of eight ewes after cessation of cortisol delivery. Similarly, follicular development and the preovulatory surge of LH were noted within 5 days after PR in four of seven ewes receiving cortisol only during the 5-day period prior to PR. Collectively, these data indicate that stress-like levels of cortisol reduce fertility of sheep by suppressing follicular development and the preovulatory surge of LH. Additionally, cortisol delivery during the follicular phase has a more profound suppressive effect on follicular development than cortisol administration during the luteal phase.