Equitable inclusion of diverse populations in oncology clinical trials: deterrents and drivers

The burden of cancer exerts a disproportionate impact across different regions and population subsets. Disease-specific attributes, coupled with genetic and socioeconomic factors, significantly influence cancer treatment outcomes. Precision oncology promises the development of safe and effective options for specific ethnic phenotypes and clinicodemographic profiles. Currently, clinical trials are concentrated in resource-rich geographies with younger, healthier, white, educated, and empowered populations. Vulnerable and marginalized people are often deprived of opportunities to participate in clinical trials. Despite consistent endeavors by regulators, industry, and other stakeholders, factors including diversity in trial regulations and patient and provider-related cultural, logistic, and operational barriers limit the inclusiveness of clinical trials. Understanding and addressing these constraints by collaborative actions involving regulatory initiatives, industry, patient advocacy groups, community engagement in a culturally sensitive manner, and designing and promoting decentralized clinical trials are vital to establishing a clinical research ecosystem that promotes equity in the representation of population subgroups.

The Convergence of Radiology and Genomics: Advancing Breast Cancer Diagnosis with Radiogenomics

Despite significant progress in the prevention, screening, diagnosis, prognosis, and therapy of breast cancer (BC), it remains a highly prevalent and life-threatening disease affecting millions worldwide. Molecular subtyping of BC is crucial for predictive and prognostic purposes due to the diverse clinical behaviors observed across various types. The molecular heterogeneity of BC poses uncertainties in its impact on diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment. Numerous studies have highlighted genetic and environmental differences between patients from different geographic regions, emphasizing the need for localized research. International studies have revealed that patients with African heritage are often diagnosed at a more advanced stage and exhibit poorer responses to treatment and lower survival rates. Despite these global findings, there is a dearth of in-depth studies focusing on communities in the African region. Early diagnosis and timely treatment are paramount to improving survival rates. In this context, radiogenomics emerges as a promising field within precision medicine. By associating genetic patterns with image attributes or features, radiogenomics has the potential to significantly improve early detection, prognosis, and diagnosis. It can provide valuable insights into potential treatment options and predict the likelihood of survival, progression, and relapse. Radiogenomics allows for visual features and genetic marker linkage that promises to eliminate the need for biopsy and sequencing. The application of radiogenomics not only contributes to advancing precision oncology and individualized patient treatment but also streamlines clinical workflows. This review aims to delve into the theoretical underpinnings of radiogenomics and explore its practical applications in the diagnosis, management, and treatment of BC and to put radiogenomics on a path towards fully integrated diagnostics.

Bladder Cancer, Loss of Y Chromosome, and New Opportunities for Immunotherapy

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have emerged as an important therapeutic approach for patients with cancers including bladder cancer (BC). This commentary describes a recent study that demonstrated that the loss of Y chromosome (LOY) and/or loss of specific genes on Y chromosome confers an aggressive phenotype to BC because of T cell dysfunction resulting in CD8+T cell exhaustion. Loss of expression of Y chromosome genes KDM5D and UTY was similarly associated with an unfavorable prognosis in patients with BC as these genes were partially responsible for the impaired anti-tumor immunity in LOY tumors. From a clinical perspective, the study showed that tumors with LOY may be susceptible to treatment with ICIs.

From Incidence to Intervention: A Comprehensive Look at Breast Cancer in South Africa

The formidable impact of breast cancer extends globally, with South Africa facing pronounced challenges, including significant disparities in breast cancer screening, treatment and survival along ethnic and socioeconomic lines. Over the last two decades, breast cancer incidence has increased and now accounts for a substantial portion of cancers in women. Ethnic disparities in terms of screening, incidence and survival exacerbate the issue, leading to delayed diagnosis among Black patients and highlighting healthcare inequities. These concerning trends underscore the urgency of enhancing breast cancer screening while mitigating treatment delays, although obstacles within the healthcare system impede progress. The intersection of breast cancer and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) further complicates matters and particularly affects the Black population. Tackling the aforementioned disparities in breast cancer in South Africa mandates a multifaceted strategy. Robust screening efforts, particularly those targeting marginalised communities, are crucial for early detection. Concurrently, expedited treatment initiation is imperative. Addressing HIV-related complexities requires tailored interventions to ensure effective care. These multifaceted disparities require pan African research and cooperation as well as tailored interventions to enhance breast cancer care within the African region.

Neoadjuvant therapy in hormone Receptor-Positive/HER2-Negative breast cancer

Neoadjuvant therapy is commonly used in patients with locally advanced or inoperable breast cancer (BC). Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) represents an established treatment modality able to downstage tumours, facilitate breast-conserving surgery, yet also achieve considerable pathologic complete response (pCR) rates in HER2-positive and triple-negative BC. For patients with HR+/HER2- BC, the choice between NACT and neoadjuvant endocrine therapy (NET) is still based on clinical and pathological features and not guided by biomarkers of defined clinical utility, differently from the adjuvant setting where gene-expression signatures have been widely adopted to drive decision-making. In this review, we summarize the evidence supporting the choice of NACT vs NET in HR+/HER2- BC, discussing the issues surrounding clinical trial design and proper selection of patients for every treatment. It is time to question the binary paradigm of responder vs non-responders as well as the "one size fits all" approach in luminal BC, supporting the utilization of continuous endpoints and the adoption of tissue and plasma-based biomarkers at multiple timepoints. This will eventually unleash the full potential of neoadjuvant therapy which is to modulate patient treatment based on treatment sensitivity and surgical outcomes. We also reviewed the current landscape of neoadjuvant studies for HR+/HER2- BC, focusing on antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) and immunotherapy combinations. Finally, we proposed a roadmap for future neoadjuvant approaches in HR+/HER2- BC, which should be based on a staggered biomarker-driven treatment selection aiming at impacting long-term relevant endpoints.

CAR-T-Cell Therapy in Multiple Myeloma: B-Cell Maturation Antigen (BCMA) and Beyond

Significant progress has been achieved in the realm of therapeutic interventions for multiple myeloma (MM), leading to transformative shifts in its clinical management. While conventional modalities such as surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy have improved the clinical outcomes, the overarching challenge of effecting a comprehensive cure for patients afflicted with relapsed and refractory MM (RRMM) endures. Notably, adoptive cellular therapy, especially chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy, has exhibited efficacy in patients with refractory or resistant B-cell malignancies and is now also being tested in patients with MM. Within this context, the B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA) has emerged as a promising candidate for CAR-T-cell antigen targeting in MM. Alternative targets include SLAMF7, CD38, CD19, the signaling lymphocyte activation molecule CS1, NKG2D, and CD138. Numerous clinical studies have demonstrated the clinical efficacy of these CAR-T-cell therapies, although longitudinal follow-up reveals some degree of antigenic escape. The widespread implementation of CAR-T-cell therapy is encumbered by several barriers, including antigenic evasion, uneven intratumoral infiltration in solid cancers, cytokine release syndrome, neurotoxicity, logistical implementation, and financial burden. This article provides an overview of CAR-T-cell therapy in MM and the utilization of BCMA as the target antigen, as well as an overview of other potential target moieties.

Intracellular DNA sensing by neutrophils and amplification of the innate immune response

As the first responders, neutrophils lead the innate immune response to infectious pathogens and inflammation inducing agents. The well-established pathogen neutralizing strategies employed by neutrophils are phagocytosis, the action of microbicide granules, the production of ROS, and the secretion of neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs). Only recently, the ability of neutrophils to sense and respond to pathogen-associated molecular patterns is being appreciated. This review brings together the current information about the intracellular recognition of DNA by neutrophils and proposes models of signal amplification in immune response. Finally, the clinical relevance of DNA sensing by neutrophils in infectious and non-infectious diseases including malignancy are also discussed.

RNA Sequencing Identifies Novel NRG1 Fusions in Solid Tumors that Lack Co-Occurring Oncogenic Drivers

NRG1 gene fusions are rare, therapeutically relevant, oncogenic drivers that occur across solid tumor types. To understand the landscape of NRG1 gene fusions, 4397 solid tumor formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded samples consecutively tested by comprehensive genomic and immune profiling during standard care were analyzed. Nineteen NRG1 fusions were found in 17 unique patients, across multiple tumor types, including non-small-cell lung (n = 7), breast (n = 2), colorectal (n = 3), esophageal (n = 2), ovarian (n = 1), pancreatic (n = 1), and unknown primary (n = 1) carcinomas, with a cumulative incidence of 0.38%. Fusions were identified with breakpoints across four NRG1 introns spanning 1.4 megabases, with a mixture of known (n = 8) and previously unreported (n = 11) fusion partners. Co-occurring driver alterations in tumors with NRG1 fusions were uncommon, except colorectal carcinoma, where concurrent alterations in APC, BRAF, and ERBB2 were present in a subset of cases. The overall lack of co-occurring drivers highlights the importance of identifying NRG1 gene fusions, as these patients are unlikely to harbor other targetable alterations. In addition, RNA sequencing is important to identify NRG1 gene fusions given the variety of fusion partners and large genomic areas where breakpoints can occur.

Mechanisms of immune modulation in the tumor microenvironment and implications for targeted therapy

The efficacy of cancer therapies is limited to a great extent by immunosuppressive mechanisms within the tumor microenvironment (TME). Numerous immune escape mechanisms have been identified. These include not only processes associated with tumor, immune or stromal cells, but also humoral, metabolic, genetic and epigenetic factors within the TME. The identification of immune escape mechanisms has enabled the development of small molecules, nanomedicines, immune checkpoint inhibitors, adoptive cell and epigenetic therapies that can reprogram the TME and shift the host immune response towards promoting an antitumor effect. These approaches have translated into series of breakthroughs in cancer therapies, some of which have already been implemented in clinical practice. In the present article the authors provide an overview of some of the most important mechanisms of immunosuppression within the TME and the implications for targeted therapies against different cancers.

Antibody-drug conjugates, immune-checkpoint inhibitors, and their combination in advanced non-small cell lung cancer

INTRODUCTION

Advanced non-small cell lung cancer (aNSCLC) is an incurable disease. The effort to develop treatments with more effective systemic agents continues. This has led to the FDA approval of one antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) and eight immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) for patients with aNSCLC.

AREAS COVERED

Due to the demonstrated efficacy of ADCs and ICIs in aNSCLC, treatment combining both agents merits attention. This article, therefore, explores the use of ADCs and ICIs in patients with NSCLC, assesses the scientific rationale for combination treatment, and provides an overview of ongoing trials. It also presents some early efficacy and safety results of such combination use.

EXPERT OPINION

It is not clear whether ADC-immunotherapy has a significant impact on those with a targetable oncogenic driver alteration since targeted therapies are effective. However, in aNSCLC without a targetable oncogenic driver alteration, the combination of ADCs and ICIs has potential and remains an area of active clinical research.

Quantifying the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on clinical trial screening rates over time in 37 countries

The COVID-19 pandemic has had an unprecedented and disruptive impact on people's health and lives worldwide. In addition to burdening people's health in the short-term in the form of infection, illness, and mortality, there has been an enormous negative impact on clinical research. Clinical trials experienced challenges in ensuring patient safety and enrolling new patients throughout the pandemic. Here, we investigate and quantify the negative impact that the COVID-19 pandemic has industry-sponsored clinical trials, both in the USA and worldwide. We find a negative correlation between the severity of the COVID-19 pandemic and clinical trial screening rate, with the relationship being strongest during the first three months of the pandemic compared to the entire duration of the pandemic. This negative statistical relationship holds across therapeutic areas, across states in the USA despite the heterogeneity of responses at the state-level, and across countries. This work has significant implications for the management of clinical trials worldwide in response to the fluctuating severity of COVID-19 moving forward and for future pandemics.

Abstract 923: Genomic landscape of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)

Background: NCSLC is the leading cause of cancer deaths in the United States (USA). The 5-year survival rate is 22.9% (7% in those with metastases). Personalized therapies have shown promise but a better understanding of the genomic landscape of the tumor may help further improve survival. Here, we present the genomic landscape and key features of NCSLC patients using a real-world clinico-genomics dataset.

Methods: The ConcertAI Genome360TM NCSLC dataset is a deeply curated real-world dataset of 11349 patients from the USA who have undergone a next generation sequencing test. This dataset covers >2000 genes. Here we present the demographic, clinical and genomic characteristics of this cohort. The top 20 genes with pathogenic mutations were identified and co-mutational analysis was performed to identify the most significant genes that were positively and negatively correlated to these genes using chi-squared test with Bonferroni correction. Other clinically relevant biomarkers such as tumor mutation burden (TMB), microsatellite instability (MSI) and Programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) status were also characterised.

Results: The median age at diagnosis was 70 years with an equal gender distribution. Adenocarcinoma (69%) and squamous cell carcinoma (24%) were the two most common histologies. Most patients were diagnosed at stage IV (57%) or III (19%). Brain, bone, and liver were the most prevalent metastatic sites. 22% patients had high expression of PD-L1, 28% had high TMB and only ~1% patients had high MSI. The 20 most frequently mutated genes along with their top 3 most significant (p-value < 3e-5) positively and negatively correlated genes are listed in Table 1.

Conclusion: This analysis provides a deeper understanding of the genomic landscape of NSCLC. The co-mutational analysis provides insights into pathways that are perturbed together providing opportunities to develop treatments to overcome such co-mutations.

Table 1. Top 20 mutated genes and their associated positively/negatively correlated genes. Gene Prevalence (%) Positively Correlated Genes Negatively Correlated Genes TP53 65 SOX2, NFE2L2, FGFR1 KRAS, MDM2, STK11 KRAS 28 STK11, RBM10, ATM EGFR, KMT2D, SOX2 CDKN2A 19 TP53, CCND1, SOX2 RB1 EGFR 13 MDM2, CDK4, CCNE1 STK11, KEAP1, KMT2D STK11 12 KEAP1, KRAS, MYC SOX2, PIK3CA, KMT2D MTAP 9 CDKN2A RB1 PIK3CA 7 SOX2, TP53, NFE2L2 KRAS, STK11 KEAP1 6 STK11, KRAS, CDKN2A EGFR SMARCA4 6 STK11, KEAP1, APC EGFR NF1 6 TP53, RASA1, PTPN11 KRAS RBM10 5 KRAS, IL7R, ATM TP53 KMT2D 7 TP53, NFE2L2, NOTCH1 KRAS, EGFR, STK11 DNMT3A 6 TET2, ASXL1, CHEK2 - RB1 7 TP53, PTEN, CCNE1 MTAP, KRAS, CDKN2A ARID1A 7 CDKN2A, TP53, FAT1 EGFR ATM 4 KRAS, NKX2-1, NFKBIA TP53 PTEN 7 RB1, TP53, KMT2D KRAS BRAF 11 SETD2, CDK6 KRAS MET 7 CDK6, MDM2, ROS1 KRAS TERT 4 MITF, PTCH1, EP300 -

Citation Format: neeraj kumar singh, Kamal S. Saini, Sangavai Chakkrapani, Eric Severson, Nahush Nagaraj, Shakti Ramkissoon, Isagani Chico, Ariel Aguilo, Rohini George, Laura Vidal, Smita Agrawal. Genomic landscape of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2023; Part 1 (Regular and Invited Abstracts); 2023 Apr 14-19; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(7_Suppl):Abstract nr 923.

Role of decentralized clinical trials in cancer drug development: Results from a survey of oncologists and patients

As a result of the unprecedented challenges imposed by the COVID-19 pandemic on enrollment to cancer clinical trials, there has been an urgency to identify and incorporate new solutions to mitigate these difficulties. The concept of decentralized or hybrid clinical trials has rapidly gained currency, given that it aims to reduce patient burden, increase patient enrollment and retention, and preserve quality of life, while also increasing the efficiency of trial logistics. Therefore, the clinical trial environment is moving toward remote collection and assessment of data, transitioning from the classic site-centric model to one that is more patient-centric.

Immuno-oncology trends: preclinical models, biomarkers, and clinical development

The landscape in immuno-oncology (I-O) has undergone profound changes since its early beginnings up through the rapid advances happening today. The current drug development pipeline consists of thousands of potential I-O therapies and therapy combinations, many of which are being evaluated in clinical trials. The efficient and successful development of these assets requires the investment in and utilization of appropriate tools and technologies that can facilitate the rapid transitions from preclinical evaluation through clinical development. These tools include (i) appropriate preclinical models, (ii) biomarkers of pharmacodynamic, predictive and monitoring utility, and (iii) evolving clinical trial designs that allow rapid and efficient evaluation during the development process. This article provides an overview of how novel discoveries and insights into each of these three areas have the potential to further address the clinical management needs for patients with cancer.

Mortality in adult patients with solid or hematological malignancies and SARS-CoV-2 infection with a specific focus on lung and breast cancers: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed to estimate mortality in adult patients with solid or hematological malignancies and SARS-CoV-2 infection.

METHODS

A systematic search of PubMed, up to 31 January 2021, identified publications reporting the case-fatality rate (CFR) among adult patients with solid or hematological malignancies and SARS-CoV-2 infection. The CFR, defined as the rate of death in this population, was assessed with a random effect model; 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated.

RESULTS

Among 135 selected studies (N = 33,879 patients), the CFR was 25.4% (95% CI 22.9%-28.2%). At a sensitivity analysis including studies with at least 100 patients, the CFR was 21.9% (95% CI 19.1%-25.1%). Among COVID-19 patients with lung (N = 1,135) and breast (N = 1,296) cancers, CFR were 32.4% (95% CI 26.5%-39.6%) and 14.2% (95% CI 9.3%-21.8%), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with solid or hematological malignancies and SARS-CoV-2 infection have a high probability of mortality, with comparatively higher and lower CFRs in patients with lung and breast cancers, respectively.

Determining lines of therapy in patients with solid cancers: a proposed new systematic and comprehensive framework

The complexity of neoplasia and its treatment are a challenge to the formulation of general criteria that are applicable across solid cancers. Determining the number of prior lines of therapy (LoT) is critically important for optimising future treatment, conducting medication audits, and assessing eligibility for clinical trial enrolment. Currently, however, no accepted set of criteria or definitions exists to enumerate LoT. In this article, we seek to open a dialogue to address this challenge by proposing a systematic and comprehensive framework to determine LoT uniformly across solid malignancies. First, key terms, including LoT and 'clinical progression of disease' are defined. Next, we clarify which therapies should be assigned a LoT, and why. Finally, we propose reporting LoT in a novel and standardised format as LoT N (CLoT + PLoT), where CLoT is the number of systemic anti-cancer therapies (SACT) administered with curative intent and/or in the early setting, PLoT is the number of SACT given with palliative intent and/or in the advanced setting, and N is the sum of CLoT and PLoT. As a next step, the cancer research community should develop and adopt standardised guidelines for enumerating LoT in a uniform manner.

Emerging issues related to COVID-19 vaccination in patients with cancer

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has resulted in millions of deaths globally. The pandemic has had a severe impact on oncology care and research. Patients with underlying cancer are more vulnerable to contracting COVID-19, and also have a more severe clinical course following the infection. The rollout of COVID-19 vaccines in many parts of the world has raised hopes of controlling the pandemic. In this editorial, the authors outline key characteristics of the currently approved COVID-19 vaccines, provide a brief overview of key emerging issues such as vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia and SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern, and review the available data related to the efficacy and side effects of vaccinating patients with cancer.

Antibody-drug conjugates, immune-checkpoint inhibitors, and their combination in breast cancer therapeutics

INTRODUCTION

Advanced breast cancer (aBC) remains incurable and the quest for more effective systemic anticancer agents continues. Promising results have led to the FDA approval of three antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) and two immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) to date for patients with aBC.

AREAS COVERED

With the anticipated emergence of newer ADCs and ICIs for patients with several subtypes of breast cancer, and given their potential synergy, their use in combination is of clinical interest. In this article, we review the use of ADCs and ICIs in patients with breast cancer, assess the scientific rationale for their combination, and provide an overview of ongoing trials and some early efficacy and safety results of such dual therapy.

EXPERT OPINION

Improvement in the medicinal chemistry of next-generation ADCs, their rational combination with ICIs and other agents, and the development of multiparametric immune biomarkers could help to significantly improve the outlook for patients with refractory aBC.

Mortality in adult patients with solid or hematological cancers and SARS-CoV-2 infection with a specific focus on lung and breast malignancies: A systematic review and meta-analysis

e18608

Background: Patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection and a diagnosis of cancer are at high risk of severe symptomatic disease (COVID-19) and death. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of published studies, to estimate the case-fatality rate (CFR) of patients with solid or hematological tumors and SARS-CoV-2 infection. Methods: A systematic search of PubMed library up to 31 January, 2021, was performed in order to identify publications reporting the CFR among adult patients with solid or hematological tumors and SARS-CoV-2 infection. CFR was defined as the rate of deaths among SARS-CoV-2-positive cancer patients. Moreover, we separately assessed the CFR among patients with lung and breast cancer. Studies with at least 10 patients were included. The CFR was assessed through a random effect model, and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated. The Higgins I2 index was computed to assess the heterogeneity between studies. Results: The systematic search of the literaturereturned 1,727studies. 1,551 were excluded on the basis of the title, 29 based on the abstract, and 3 were duplicates. A total of 144 studies were selected, including 35,725 patients with solid or hematological tumors and SARS-CoV-2 infection. In total, 46 and 32 studies reported the CFR among COVID-19 patients with lung (total N = 1,555) and breast (total N = 1.398) cancer, respectively. Overall, the CFR was 25.5% (95% CI 23.1%-28.1%, Egger test p < 0.001). A sensitivity analysis, after excluding studies with less than 100 patients, showed a CFR of 22.1% (95% CI 19.4%-25.2%). The CFR among patients with lung cancer and SARS-CoV2 infection was 33.4% (95% CI 28.1%-39.6%) when including all studies and 26.3% (95% CI 17.6%-39.2%) at the sensitivity analysis after excluding studies with less than 100 patients. The CFR among patients with breast cancer and SARS-CoV2 infection was 13.7% (95% CI 9.1%-20.7%) when including all studies and 13.0% (95% CI 7.6%-22.1%) at the sensitivity analysis after excluding studies with less than 100 patients. Conclusions: One year after the outbreak of the pandemic, this large meta-analysis reports the impact of SARS-CoV-2 infection in patients with cancer. This population experienced a high probability of mortality, with a comparatively higher CFR in patients with lung cancer, and a comparatively lower CFR in patients with breast cancer. Patients with an underlying diagnosis of cancer require special attention with aggressive preventive measures that also include early access to COVID-19 vaccination.

Cancer Treatment and Research During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Experience of the First 6 Months

The coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has had a significant impact on patients with underlying malignancy. In this article, we summarize emerging data related to patients with cancer and COVID-19. Among patients with COVID-19, a higher proportion have an underlying diagnosis of cancer than seen in the general population. Also, patients with malignancy are likely to be more vulnerable than the general population to contracting COVID-19. Mortality is significantly higher in patients with both cancer and COVID-19 compared with the overall COVID-19-positive population. The early months of the pandemic saw a decrease in cancer screening and diagnosis, as well as postponement of standard treatments, which could lead to excess deaths from cancer in the future.

Mortality in patients with cancer and coronavirus disease 2019: A systematic review and pooled analysis of 52 studies

Background

Patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) who have underlying malignancy have a higher mortality rate compared with those without cancer, although the magnitude of such excess risk is not clearly defined. We performed a systematic review and pooled analysis to provide precise estimates of the mortality rate among patients with both cancer and COVID-19.

Methods

A systematic literature search involving peer-reviewed publications, preprints and conference proceedings up to July 16, 2020, was performed. The primary end-point was the case fatality rate (CFR), defined as the rate of death among patients with cancer and COVID-19. The CFR was assessed with a random effects model, which was used to derive a pooled CFR and its 95% confidence interval (CI).

Results

Fifty-two studies, involving a total of 18,650 patients with both COVID-19 and cancer, were selected for the pooled analysis. A total of 4243 deaths were recorded in this population. The probability of death was 25.6% (95% CI: 22.0%–29.5%; I² = 48.9%) in this patient population.

Conclusions

Patients with cancer who develop COVID-19 have high probability of mortality. Appropriate and aggressive preventive measures must be taken to reduce the risk of COVID-19 in patients with cancer and to optimally manage those who do contract the infection.

Galactogram for Investigation of Pathological Nipple Discharge: A Forgotten Arrow in the Radiologists’ Quiver?

Conventional X-ray galactogram (CG) is an underutilized procedure in modern breast imaging despite offering the highest spatial resolution among all modalities available for imaging of the breast ducts. The superior diagnostic performance of CG as compared to that of both conventional mammogram and high-resolution ultrasonography makes it a valuable imaging modality for the evaluation of pathological nipple discharge (PND). In addition, CG should always be considered in women with bloody nipple discharge but normal ultrasound and mammogram. CG also has an important role in the preoperative localization of intraductal lesions. CG may be especially useful in resource-restricted settings where breast magnetic resonance imaging is not readily available as it can be easily performed at any mammography facility without the need for additional equipment. In this article, we describe two cases of PND, one of benign and the other of malignant etiology, to demonstrate the value of CG in these cases. We also review the current literature and compare CG with other modalities used for imaging of ductal system of the breast.

Towards understanding the breast cancer epigenome: a comparison of genome-wide DNA methylation and gene expression data

Until recently, an elevated disease risk has been ascribed to a genetic predisposition, however, exciting progress over the past years has discovered alternate elements of inheritance that involve epigenetic regulation. Epigenetic changes are heritably stable alterations that include DNA methylation, histone modifications and RNA-mediated silencing. Aberrant DNA methylation is a common molecular basis for a number of important human diseases, including breast cancer. Changes in DNA methylation profoundly affect global gene expression patterns. What is emerging is a more dynamic and complex association between DNA methylation and gene expression than previously believed. Although many tools have already been developed for analyzing genome-wide gene expression data, tools for analyzing genome-wide DNA methylation have not yet reached the same level of refinement.

Here we provide an in-depth analysis of DNA methylation in parallel with gene expression data characteristics and describe the particularities of low-level and high-level analyses of DNA methylation data. Low-level analysis refers to pre-processing of methylation data (i.e. normalization, transformation and filtering), whereas high-level analysis is focused on illustrating the application of the widely used class comparison, class prediction and class discovery methods to DNA methylation data. Furthermore, we investigate the influence of DNA methylation on gene expression by measuring the correlation between the degree of CpG methylation and the level of expression and to explore the pattern of methylation as a function of the promoter region.

Abstract OT1-1-01: LORELEI: A Phase II randomized, double-blind study of neoadjuvant letrozole plus taselisib (GDC-0032) versus letrozole plus placebo in postmenopausal women with ER-positive/HER2-negative, early stage breast cancer

Background: Taselisib (GDC-0032) is an orally bioavailable, potent, and selective inhibitor of Class I PI3-kinase (PI3K) alpha, gamma, and delta isoforms, with 30-fold less inhibition of the PI3K beta isoform relative to the PI3K alpha isoform. Preclinical data show that taselisib has enhanced activity against PIK3CA mutant cancer cell lines. Clinical data have also demonstrated confirmed partial responses in patients with PIK3CA mutant breast cancer treated with single-agent taselisib. Preclinical and clinical data also show enhanced antitumor activity when taselisib is combined with either letrozole or fulvestrant.

Study design: LORELEI is a phase II, two-arm, randomized, double-blind, multicenter, neoadjuvant study of letrozole and taselisib versus letrozole and placebo in postmenopausal women with newly diagnosed ER+/HER2-, untreated, stage I-III operable breast cancer. Other relevant eligibility criteria include tumor size ≥ 2 cm, unilateral disease, ECOG PS ≤1, and available and evaluable tumor tissue for central review of PIK3CA mutation analysis. Patients will be randomized (1:1) to receive continuous daily letrozole (2.5 mg) with either placebo or taselisib (4mg on a 5 days on/ 2 days off schedule) for 16 weeks. Study treatment is followed by surgery. Adjuvant treatment will be given as per physician’s discretion. Stratification at randomization is based on tumor size and nodal status.

Endpoints: The co-primary endpoints are overall objective response rate (ORR) by centrally assessed breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) via modified RECIST criteria and pathologic complete response (pCR) rate in breast and axilla at time of surgery in all enrolled patients and PIK3CA mutant (MT) patients. Secondary endpoints include ORR by centrally assessed MRI and pCR rate in PIK3CA wild-type (WT) patients. Other secondary endpoints performed in all enrolled patients and separately as per PIK3CA mutation status include: assessment of ORR using breast ultrasound, clinical breast exam (i.e. palpation) and mammography; changes in Ki67 levels from baseline to week 3, baseline to surgery and week 3 to surgery; centrally assessed preoperative endocrine prognostic index (PEPI) score; changes in enhancing tumor volume from baseline to surgery as measured by breast MRI via central assessment. Exploratory analyses include expression of biomarkers predictive of response to letrozole plus taselisib from tumor tissue or blood.

Statistical methods:

The sample size was calculated to detect an absolute percentage increase of 24% in ORR via MRI (40% in the letrozole-placebo arm vs. 64% in the letrozole-taselisib arm in the PIK3CA MT cohort) with 80% power at 16% two-sided significance level. The sample size will also detect an absolute percentage increase of 18% in pCR rate (1% in the letrozole-placebo arm vs 19% in the letrozole-taselisib arm in the PIK3CA MT cohort) with 80% power at 4% two-sided significance level.

Target accrual: Approximately 330 pts at 110 global sites across Europe, North and South America, and Asia-Pacific.

Reference Study ID Numbers: GO28888/BIG-3-13/SOLTI 1205/ABCSG 38.

Citation Format: Cristina Saura, Evandro de Azambuja, Peter Dubsky, Mafalda Oliveira, Kamal S Saini, Christian Fes, Ray S Lin, Timothy R Wilson, Jill Fredickson, Hema Parmar, Jerry Y Hsu, Martine Piccard, Michael Gnant, Jose Baselga. LORELEI: A Phase II randomized, double-blind study of neoadjuvant letrozole plus taselisib (GDC-0032) versus letrozole plus placebo in postmenopausal women with ER-positive/HER2-negative, early stage breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Seventh Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2014 Dec 9-13; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(9 Suppl):Abstract nr OT1-1-01.

Treatment of early-stage HER2+ breast cancer-an evolving field

The evolving field of HER2-targeted therapy has significantly improved the outcome of women diagnosed with HER2-positive invasive breast cancer. In this review, we sought to summarise the efficacy of trastuzumab-based regimens in the adjuvant and neoadjuvant setting with a special emphasis on relevant clinical questions: treatment duration, sequence of trastuzumab administration, toxicity, the role of anthracycline-based regimens, and optimal management of small HER2+ tumours. Controversial topics are discussed taking into consideration the development of modern anti-HER2 agents.

The AURORA initiative for metastatic breast cancer

Metastatic breast cancer is one of the leading causes of cancer-related mortality among women in the Western world. To date most research efforts have focused on the molecular analysis of the primary tumour to dissect the genotypes of the disease. However, accumulating evidence supports a molecular evolution of breast cancer during its life cycle, with metastatic lesions acquiring new molecular aberrations. Recognising this critical gap of knowledge, the Breast International Group is launching AURORA, a large, multinational, collaborative metastatic breast cancer molecular screening programme. Approximately 1300 patients with metastatic breast cancer who have received no more than one line of systemic treatment for advanced disease will, after giving informed consent, donate archived primary tumour tissue, as well as will donate tissue collected prospectively from the biopsy of metastatic lesions and blood. Both tumour tissue types, together with a blood sample, will then be subjected to next generation sequencing for a panel of cancer-related genes. The patients will be treated at the discretion of their treating physicians per standard local practice, and they will be followed for clinical outcome for 10 years. Alternatively, depending on the molecular profiles found, patients will be directed to innovative clinical trials assessing molecularly targeted agents. Samples of outlier patients considered as 'exceptional responders' or as 'rapid progressors' based on the clinical follow-up will be subjected to deeper molecular characterisation in order to identify new prognostic and predictive biomarkers. AURORA, through its innovative design, will shed light onto some of the unknown areas of metastatic breast cancer, helping to improve the clinical outcome of breast cancer patients.

Challenges in launching multinational oncology clinical trials in India

In the recent past, there has been an impressive growth in the number of clinical trials launched worldwide, including India. Participation in well-designed oncology clinical trials is of advantage to Indian healthcare system in general, and cancer patients in particular. However, the number of clinical trials being run in India is not commensurate with the cancer burden prevailing in the country. In this article, the authors investigate the reasons for this discrepancy, highlight critical bottlenecks, and propose ways to ameliorate the situation.

Neurofibromatosis type I with breast cancer: not only for women!

The association of neurofibromatosis type I with invasive male breast cancer is a rare clinical entity with only one case in literature reported in 1953. Women with NF1 are at risk of developing breast cancer and men also may be at risk but there is scarce data on the risk and association of NF1 with male breast cancer due to its rarity. Established clinical trials in male breast cancer patients are lacking and the results are extrapolated from female breast cancer patients. The treatment of male breast cancer is followed as per the guidelines of premenopausal female breast cancer and tamoxifen is the hormone treatment in them. Mendes et al suggests that silencing of NF1 gene confers resistance to tamoxifen. Our conclusions are that since NF1 is mutated or deleted in one third of sporadic breast cancers, its role as a molecular driver for treatment has to be further explored.

Abstract OT2-6-08: Phase II, randomized, parallel-cohort study of neoadjuvant buparlisib (BKM120) in combination with trastuzumab and paclitaxel in women with HER2-positive, PIK3CA mutant and PIK3CA wild-type primary breast cancer – NeoPHOEBE

Background: The PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway is frequently activated in breast cancer (BC) and is important for the oncogenic function of HER2. Buparlisib is an oral pan-PI3K inhibitor that targets all 4 isoforms of class I PI3K (α, β, γ, Δ). Preliminary clinical activity was observed with buparlisib in patients (pts) with advanced BC as a single agent, and in combination with paclitaxel (Dirix et al. ESMO 2012) or trastuzumab (Pistilli et al. ESMO 2012).

Study design: NeoPHOEBE (NCT01816594) is a Phase II, randomized, double-blind, parallel-cohort study of neoadjuvant buparlisib or matched placebo plus trastuzumab and weekly paclitaxel. Upfront stratification of pts into 2 independent cohorts according to PIK3CA mutation status will determine whether pts with PIK3CA-mutant tumors may benefit more from this treatment combination. Adult women with newly diagnosed, HER2-positive, primary non-inflammatory BC who have not previously received systemic therapy for invasive disease are eligible. Other eligibility criteria: tumor size &gt;2 cm; unilateral disease; available tumor tissue for central review of estrogen receptor (ER) and HER2 status, and PIK3CA genotype; known PIK3CA mutation status; and ECOG PS ≤1. Pts in each cohort (PIK3CA mutant or wild-type [wt]) are randomized (1:1) to receive continuous daily buparlisib (100 mg) or placebo and weekly trastuzumab (4 mg/kg loading dose then 2 mg/kg) for 6 weeks, followed by continuous daily buparlisib (80 mg) or placebo with weekly trastuzumab (2 mg/kg) and weekly paclitaxel (80 mg/m2) for 12 weeks. Study treatment is followed by surgery within 4 weeks of last paclitaxel dose. Stratification at randomization is based on PIK3CA (mutant vs wt) and ER (positive vs negative) status.

Endpoints: All endpoints will be measured in both PIK3CA-mutant and wt cohorts. The primary endpoint is rate of pathologic complete response (pCR; ypT0) at time of surgery. The key secondary endpoint is objective response rate (ORR) at the end of week 6. Other secondary endpoints include pCR by other definitions, ORR prior to surgery, pCR and objective response by ER status, percent of pts with node-negative disease at surgery, rate of breast conserving surgery, and safety. Exploratory objectives include change in standardized uptake value (SUV) at Day 15 by FDG-PET; and ORR and pCR by PTEN expression, Ki67 level, apoptosis rates, percentage of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL), and by phenotype of 50% TIL at baseline.

Statistical methods: The sample size is based on a minimax 2-stage randomized Phase II design with a prospective control. This design allows for early stopping if the desired efficacy is not observed after stage 1. Both cohorts are powered (80%) to detect a clinically meaningful increase in pCR of 18% at a one-sided significance level (α = 0.15).

Target accrual: Planned enrollment for NeoPHOEBE is up to 220 pts at 65 sites in 12 countries across South America, Europe, and Asia-Pacific.

Contact: For further study information, contact BIG@bordet.be.

Citation Information: Cancer Res 2013;73(24 Suppl): Abstract nr OT2-6-08.

Genomic Grade Index (GGI): feasibility in routine practice and impact on treatment decisions in early breast cancer

Purpose

Genomic Grade Index (GGI) is a 97-gene signature that improves histologic grade (HG) classification in invasive breast carcinoma. In this prospective study we sought to evaluate the feasibility of performing GGI in routine clinical practice and its impact on treatment recommendations.

Methods

Patients with pT1pT2 or operable pT3, N0-3 invasive breast carcinoma were recruited from 8 centers in Belgium. Fresh surgical samples were sent at room temperature in the MapQuant Dx™ PathKit for centralized genomic analysis. Genomic profiles were determined using Affymetrix U133 Plus 2.0 and GGI calculated using the MapQuant Dx® protocol, which defines tumors as low or high Genomic Grade (GG-1 and GG-3 respectively).

Results

180 pts were recruited and 155 were eligible. The MapQuant test was performed in 142 cases and GGI was obtained in 78% of cases (n=111). Reasons for failures were 15 samples with <30% of invasive tumor cells (11%), 15 with insufficient RNA quality (10%), and 1 failed hybridization (<1%). For tumors with an available representative sample (≥ 30% inv. tumor cells) (n=127), the success rate was 87.5%. GGI reclassified 69% of the 54 HG2 tumors as GG-1 (54%) or GG-3 (46%). Changes in treatment recommendations occurred mainly in the subset of HG2 tumors reclassified into GG-3, with increased use of chemotherapy in this subset.

Conclusion

The use of GGI is feasible in routine clinical practice and impacts treatment decisions in early-stage breast cancer.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01916837, http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01916837

Magnitude of Trastuzumab Benefit in Patients With HER2-Positive, Invasive Lobular Breast Carcinoma: Results From the HERA Trial

Purpose

To evaluate the benefit of adjuvant trastuzumab in patients diagnosed with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) –positive invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) enrolled onto the Herceptin Adjuvant (HERA) trial.

Patients and Methods

Patients randomly assigned to receive one year of trastuzumab and one year of observation in the HERA trial were included (n = 3,401). Centrally reviewed estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PgR), and HER2 copy numbers were used. First site-specific relapse pattern was evaluated for ILC and invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC). The magnitude of trastuzumab benefit was assessed using the Cox proportional hazards model for disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS).

Results

Median follow-up time was 4 years. A total of 187 ILC and 3,213 IDC patients were included. High Allred scores (6 to 8) were more common in patients with ILC than IDC for both ER (36.9% v 22.7%) and PgR (44.1% v 28.5%). A trend toward decreased HER2 copy number was observed in the ILC group. The ILC and IDC subgroups had similar patterns of first site of disease relapse. DFS hazard ratios (HRs) comparing 1 year of trastuzumab versus observation were 0.63 for ILC (95% CI, 0.34 to 1.15) and 0.77 for IDC (95% CI, 0.67 to 0.89; P for interaction = .49). The OS HRs comparing 1 year of trastuzumab versus observation were 0.60 for ILC (95% CI, 0.27 to 1.31) and 0.86 for IDC (95% CI, 0.71 to 1.06; P for interaction = .29).

Conclusion

In this retrospective analysis, there was no suggestion that patients in the ILC cohort experienced a different magnitude of benefit from adjuvant trastuzumab than those in the IDC cohort.

Targeting the PI3K/AKT/mTOR and Raf/MEK/ERK pathways in the treatment of breast cancer

Alterations of signal transduction pathways leading to uncontrolled cellular proliferation, survival, invasion, and metastases are hallmarks of the carcinogenic process. The phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K)/AKT/mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) and the Raf/mitogen-activated and extracellular signal-regulated kinase kinase (MEK)/extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) signaling pathways are critical for normal human physiology, and also commonly dysregulated in several human cancers, including breast cancer (BC). In vitro and in vivo data suggest that the PI3K/AKT/mTOR and Raf/MEK/ERK cascades are interconnected with multiple points of convergence, cross-talk, and feedback loops. Raf/MEK/ERK and PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway mutations may co-exist. Inhibition of one pathway can still result in the maintenance of signaling via the other (reciprocal) pathway. The existence of such "escape" mechanisms implies that dual targeting of these pathways may lead to superior efficacy and better clinical outcome in selected patients. Several clinical trials targeting one or both pathways are already underway in BC patients. The toxicity profile of this novel approach of dual pathway inhibition needs to be closely monitored, given the important physiological role of PI3K/AKT/mTOR and Raf/MEK/ERK signaling. In this article, we present a review of the current relevant pre-clinical and clinical data and discuss the rationale for dual inhibition of these pathways in the treatment of BC patients.

Genomic grade adds prognostic value in invasive lobular carcinoma

BACKGROUND

The prognostic value of histologic grade (HG) in invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) remains uncertain, and most ILC tumors are graded as HG2. Genomic grade (GG) is a 97-gene signature that improves the prognostic value of HG. This study evaluates whether GG may overcome the limitations of HG in ILC.

METHODS

Gene expression data were generated from frozen tumor samples, and GG calculated according to the expression of 97 genes. The prognostic value of GG was assessed in a stratified Cox regression model for invasive disease-free survival (IDFS) and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

A total of 166 patients were classified by GG. HG classified 33 (20%) tumors as HG1, 120 (73%) as HG2 and 12 (7%) as HG3. GG classified 106 (64%) tumors as GG low (GG1), 29 (17%) as GG high (GG3) and 31 (19%) as equivocal (cases not classified as GG1 or GG3). The median follow-up time was 6.5 years. In multivariate analyses, GG was associated with IDFS [HR(GG3 vs GG1) 5.6 (2.1-15.3); P < 0.001] and OS [HR(GG3 vs GG1) 7.2, 95% CI (1.6-32.2); P = 0.01].

CONCLUSIONS

GG outperformed HG in ILC and added prognostic value to classic clinicopathologic variables, including nodal status.

Pertuzumab: new hope for patients with HER2-positive breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) overexpression is detected in approximately 15% to 20% of all breast cancers (BCs). A revolutionary change in the prognosis of this subgroup of patients has occurred since trastuzumab therapy was introduced into daily clinical practice. However, because trastuzumab resistance is common, new molecules with complementary and/or synergistic mechanisms of action have been developed. Pertuzumab is a new anti-HER2 humanized monoclonal antibody that prevents the formation of HER2 dimers.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A computer-based literature search was carried out using PubMed (keywords: breast neoplasm, dimerization, HER-2, pertuzumab); data reported at international meetings are included.

RESULTS

This paper describes pertuzumab's mechanism of action, safety, and role in HER2-positive BCs. It also explores the role of pertuzumab as a single agent or combined with trastuzumab by reviewing data from preclinical research to ongoing clinical trials. Recently published trials, particularly the CLEOPATRA study, highlight the efficacy, tolerability, and increase in disease-free survival associated with this novel agent when combined with trastuzumab.

CONCLUSION

The pertuzumab and trastuzumab anti-HER2 dual blockade is likely to represent a substantial advance for patients with HER2-positive BCs and a new milestone on the way to personalized medicine.

Analysis of regional timelines to set up a global phase III clinical trial in breast cancer: the adjuvant lapatinib and/or trastuzumab treatment optimization experience

PURPOSE

This study measured the time taken for setting up the different facets of adjuvant lapatinib and/or trastuzumab treatment optimization (ALTTO), an nternational phase III study being conducted in 44 participating countries.

METHODS

Time to regulatory authority (RA) approval, time to ethics committee/institutional review board (EC/IRB) approval, time from study approval by EC/IRB to first randomized patient, and time from first to last randomized patient were prospectively collected in the ALTTO study. Analyses were conducted by grouping countries into either geographic regions or economic classes as per the World Bank's criteria.

RESULTS

South America had a significantly longer time to RA approval (median: 236 days, range: 21-257 days) than Europe (median: 52 days, range: 0-151 days), North America (median: 26 days, range: 22-30 days), and Asia-Pacific (median: 62 days, range: 37-75 days). Upper-middle economies had longer times to RA approval (median: 123 days, range: 21-257 days) than high-income (median: 47 days, range: 0-112 days) and lower-middle income economies (median: 57 days, range: 37-62 days). No significant difference was observed for time to EC/IRB approval across the studied regions (median: 59 days, range 0-174 days). Overall, the median time from EC/IRB approval to first recruited patient was 169 days (range: 26-412 days).

CONCLUSION

This study highlights the long time intervals required to activate a global phase III trial. Collaborative research groups, pharmaceutical industry sponsors, and regulatory authorities should analyze the current system and enter into dialogue for optimizing local policies. This would enable faster access of patients to innovative therapies and enhance the efficiency of clinical research.

Targeted therapies in breast cancer: are heart and vessels also being targeted?

The concept of 'targeted' therapies implies that such drugs only act on cells that specifically express the particular target, therefore giving rise to a low incidence of side effects. However, targeted therapies currently approved for the treatment of breast cancer have demonstrated a relatively high incidence of cardiovascular events. The anti-HER2 agents trastuzumab and lapatinib may cause left ventricular dysfunction or even congestive heart failure. Bevacizumab, an antiangiogenic drug, has been shown to increase the risk of hypertension, cardiovascular dysfunction and thromboembolic events. In addition, several anti-human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) and antiangiogenic agents plus their combinations are currently being developed and evaluated for the treatment of breast cancer. In this review, we aim to assess the incidence of cardiac adverse events associated with targeted therapies designed to block HER2 and angiogenic pathways.

Dissecting the heterogeneity of triple-negative breast cancer

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) accounts for 15% to 20% of breast cancers. It is a heterogeneous disease, not only on the molecular level, but also on the pathologic and clinical levels. TNBC is associated with a significantly higher probability of relapse and poorer overall survival in the first few years after diagnosis when compared with other breast cancer subtypes. This is observed despite its usual high sensitivity to chemotherapy. In the advanced setting, responses observed with chemotherapy lack durability. Early-stage clinical studies suggested impressive potential when a poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor is given for the treatment of advanced TNBC with BRCA gene dysfunction. The molecular complexity of TNBC has led to proposed subclassifications, which will be of great value for the development of targeted therapies. In this review, we discuss the biology of TNBC at the pathologic and the molecular levels. We also elaborate on the role of systemic therapies and the results of the first phase III clinical trial evaluating the addition of iniparib, a novel investigational anticancer agent that does not possess characteristics typical of the PARP inhibitor class, in combination with chemotherapy in advanced TNBC.

Benefit-risk assessment of bevacizumab in the treatment of breast cancer

An evaluation of the benefit-versus-risk of bevacizumab in the treatment of advanced breast cancer is timely and relevant. Recently, the US FDA has withdrawn the approval of bevacizumab as a therapeutic option for the treatment of advanced breast cancer, generating controversy in the scientific community. Although the pivotal study (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group 2100 trial [E2100]) had shown doubling of the progression-free survival when bevacizumab was added to chemotherapy, this magnitude of benefit could not be replicated in subsequent studies. Furthermore, individual studies and meta-analyses failed to demonstrate an overall survival benefit with the addition of bevacizumab to different chemotherapy regimens. In addition, this agent is associated with an increased incidence of serious adverse events such as hypertension, congestive heart failure and thromboembolism, and its cost is likely to be a consideration in its use for many patients worldwide. Retrospective biomarker-based studies aiming to identify the subpopulation of patients most likely to benefit from the addition of bevacizumab to standard chemotherapy in breast cancer should be a research priority.

P1-02-05: Invasive Lobular Carcinoma – A Luminal Breast Cancer Histotype Enriched for Epithelial-to-Mesenchymal Transition Features

Background: Invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) represent the second most common breast cancer (BC) histotype, but little information is available about its molecular features. We sought to perform a comprehensive molecular classification of ILC and to investigate the molecular features that can differentiate ILC from invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC).

Methods: A consecutive series of 174 ILC tumors from three different centers with mininum 5-year follow-up was selected. Gene expression data were generated using Affymetrix U133 Plus 2.0 arrays. Data were analyzed by using frozen robust multiarray analysis (Matthew et al. 2009). ILC tumors were classified into BC molecular subtypes using the PAM50 classifier. Invasive Disease Free Survival (IDFS) was defined as the interval between the date of surgery and the date of any invasive recurrence or death. Multivariate analyses for 10-y IDFS containing classical clinico-pathologic characteristics were performed for different gene signatures, which were scaled so that 2.5 and 97.5% percentiles equal −1 and 1. A cohort of 90 IDC tumor samples, normalised with the same method, was used to compare expression data between ILC and IDC.

Results: ILCs were mainly characterized as luminal A (LA: 76%, n=133) and luminal B (LB:; 20%, n=34) followed by a minority of HER2−positive (2%, n=3), basal (1%, n=2) and normal-like (1%, n=2) based on Perou's classification. LB had inferior 10-y IDFS than LA in univariate cox regression analysis (HR = 1.99, 95% CI, 1.08−3.67, p=0.026). The EMT gene module was significantly higher expressed in ILC as compared to IDC (p &lt; 0.001). Adjusted hazard ratios (HR) for different gene modules investigated are detailed in the table below.

OT1-02-04: Adjuvant Pertuzumab and Herceptin IN IniTial TherapY of Breast Cancer: APHINITY (BIG 4–11/BO25126/TOC4939g)

Background

Approximately 20% of breast cancer (BC) patients (pts) have HER2−positive tumors. While the adjuvant use of the anti-HER2 humanized monoclonal antibody trastuzumab (T) has been shown to improve disease-free (DFS) and overall survival (OS), not all pts treated with this agent benefit from this therapy. Pertuzumab (P) is a humanized monoclonal antibody that inhibits HER2 dimerization and induces ADCC with a complementary mechanism of action to T. In HER2−positiveadvanced BC, T and P is active in pts who have progressed to T. In the neoadjuvant setting, T and P in combination with chemotherapy (CT) nearly doubled the pathological complete response rate compared to either T or P administered in combination with CT (45.8% vs 29% vs 24%, respectively). Therefore, comprehensive HER2 blockade with two anti-HER2 monoclonal antibodies warrants further investigation in the adjuvant setting.

Trial Design: APHINITY is a prospective, randomized, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled study in pts with HER2−positive primary BC who have had an excision of their tumor. Pts will be randomized to one of 2 arms (1:1 ratio). The investigational arm will comprise of a course of adjuvant CT (investigators choice) consisting of either an anthracycline-taxane or taxane-platin containing regimens and T and P for 1 year. The comparator arm will consist of the same adjuvant CT backbone with T and placebo for 1 year.

Major Eligibility Criteria:

1. Non-metastatic primary BC histologically confirmed and adequately excised

2. Node-positive or node-negative: for patients with node-positive disease (pN ≥1), any pT except T0; for patients with node-negative disease (pN0), tumor size must be &gt;1.0 cm OR for tumor size between &gt;0.5 cm and ≤1.0 cm, at least one of the following features will be required: histologic grade 3 OR negative for ER and PgR OR age &lt;35 years

3. The interval between definitive surgery for BC and randomization must be at least 3 weeks but no more than 7 weeks

4. Baseline LVEF ≥55%

5. HER2−positive BC confirmed by a central laboratory and defined as: IHC 3+ in &gt;10% immunoreactive cells OR HER2 gene amplification by in situ hybridization [ISH] (ratio of HER2 gene signals to centromere 17 signals ≥2)

Aims: The primary objective is to compare invasive disease-free survival (IDFS) between both treatment arms. Secondary objectives include comparing IDFS including second non-BC, DFS, OS, recurrence-free interval (RFI), distant RFI, cardiac safety, overall safety and health-related quality of life in the two treatment arms.

Statistical Methods: Pts will be stratified based on nodal status, type of adjuvant CT regimen, hormone receptor status and geographical region. The study is designed to have an 80% power to test the null hypothesis of no true difference in risk of an IDFS event (HR = 1) versus the alternative hypothesis of a difference (HR = 0.75) in hazard rates with a 5%, 2-sided significance level.

Target accrual: 3806; Present accrual: Start Q4 2011

Citation Information: Cancer Res 2011;71(24 Suppl):Abstract nr OT1-02-04.

Role of the multidisciplinary team in breast cancer management: results from a large international survey involving 39 countries

BACKGROUND

The optimal management of patients with breast cancer (BC) requires the expertise of specialists from different disciplines. This has led to the evolution of multidisciplinary teams (MDTs), allowing all key professionals to jointly discuss individual patients and to contribute independently to clinical decisions. Data regarding BC MDTs in different regions and countries are scarce.

METHODS

The investigators of a large global phase III adjuvant BC trial being conducted by the Breast International Group were invited to respond to a questionnaire about the extent, structure, and function of BC MDTs.

RESULTS

One hundred and fifty-two responses from 39 countries were received, and remarkable differences were noted in different geographic regions. Sixty-five percent of the respondents from eastern Europe, 63% from western Europe, 35% from Asia, and 25% from South America declared that MDT was a mandatory part of BC care in their country. Ninety percent of the respondents from Europe stated their MDTs met weekly, compared with only half of the respondents from Asia.

CONCLUSION

This survey is perhaps the first large-scale effort to collect information regarding BC MDTs from different parts of the world and provides objective information of frequency, composition, function, and working mechanism of BC MDTs.

Rituximab in Hodgkin lymphoma: is the target always a hit?

In 1997, the anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody (MAb) rituximab became the first MAb approved for clinical use in oncology, and ushered in a new era of rationally designed targeted agents in cancer therapeutics. It is currently approved for use in non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), chronic lymphoid leukemia (CLL), and rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Rituximab is non-mutagenic, associated with low treatment-related toxicity, and few, if any, long term adverse events, making it an attractive agent to be tried in off-label settings like Hodgkin lymphoma (HL). HL consists of two distinct subtypes - classic HL (cHL) and lymphocyte predominant HL (LPHL). CD20 is present in virtually all patients with LPHL, and in a significant minority of patients with cHL. In this CD20 positive sub-population, the use of rituximab is a rational intervention strategy. Rituximab has been used in patients with cHL as well as LPHL with good efficacy. In this article, we provide a clinically-oriented overview of the use of rituximab in the different sub-types of HL, and report updated results of our series of 8 LPHL patients treated with rituximab. A systematic review of the literature is also presented.