Lyme neuroborreliosis epidemiology in Sweden 2010 to 2014: clinical microbiology laboratories are a better data source than the hospital discharge diagnosis register

BackgroundIn a study from 2013 that prioritised communicable diseases for surveillance in Sweden, we identified Lyme borreliosis as one of the diseases with highest priority. In 2014, when the present study was designed, there were also plans to make neuroborreliosis notifiable within the European Union.AimWe compared possibilities of surveillance of neuroborreliosis in Sweden through two different sources: the hospital discharge register and reporting from the clinical microbiology laboratories.MethodsWe examined the validity of ICD-10 codes in the hospital discharge register by extracting personal identification numbers for all cases of neuroborreliosis, defined by a positive cerebrospinal fluid-serum anti-Borrelia antibody index, who were diagnosed at the largest clinical microbiology laboratory in Sweden during 2014. We conducted a retrospective observational study with a questionnaire sent to all clinical microbiology laboratories in Sweden requesting information on yearly number of cases, age group and sex for the period 2010 to 2014.ResultsAmong 150 neuroborreliosis cases, 67 (45%) had received the ICD-10 code A69.2 (Lyme borreliosis) in combination with G01.9 (meningitis in bacterial diseases classified elsewhere), the combination that the Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare recommends for neuroborreliosis. All 22 clinical laboratories replied to our questionnaire. Based on laboratory reporting, the annual incidence of neuroborreliosis in Sweden was 6.3 cases per 100,000 in 2014.ConclusionThe hospital discharge register was unsuitable for surveillance of neuroborreliosis, whereas laboratory-based reporting was a feasible alternative. In 2018, the European Commission included Lyme neuroborreliosis on the list of diseases under epidemiological surveillance.

Phenotypic detection of plasmid-acquired AmpC in Escherichia coli--evaluation of screening criteria and performance of two commercial methods for the phenotypic confirmation of AmpC production

The phenotypic detection of plasmid-acquired AmpC (pAmpC) in Escherichia coli is challenging, and molecular methods are required for confirmation. In addition to cefoxitin resistance, multiresistance and high-level resistance to cephalosporins have both been suggested as criteria for targeting isolates with pAmpC, but data to support these proposed criteria are lacking. A Swedish collection of 378 isolates with either putative chromosomal hyperproduction of AmpC (cAmpC) or pAmpC were subjected to disk diffusion and minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) determination with the Etest. The frequency of resistance to gentamicin, ciprofloxacin, and trimethoprim among cAmpC and pAmpC was compared to elucidate the issue of multidrug resistance. Lastly, methods for the phenotypic confirmation of pAmpC were compared. One in-house disk diffusion method, one method employing NeoSensitabs (Rosco), and one Etest method (bioMérieux) were compared. The analysis of histograms based on both disk diffusion and the Etest showed that resistance [according to the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST)] to cefotaxime and/or ceftazidime occurred in almost all isolates. By coining resistance instead of non-susceptibility, the number of isolates required to subject to phenotypic testing/genotypic confirmation dropped by more than 40 %, without compromising the sensitivity substantially. Further, almost 70 % of isolates with pAmpC were non-multidrug resistant, clearly indicating that this is an inappropriate criterion for further investigation. The phenotypic tests all had more than 90 % sensitivity, and the best sensitivities were obtained with the in-house method and with the ceftazidime ± cloxacillin NeoSensitab. In conclusion, clinical resistance to cefotaxime and/or ceftazidime seems to be an appropriate criterion for pAmpC screening, and several phenotypic methods perform well for the phenotypic confirmation of AmpC production prior to genotypic confirmation.

Worldwide diversity of Klebsiella pneumoniae that produce beta-lactamase blaKPC-2 gene

TOC summary: Clones harboring different plasmids with identical genetic structure could be the origin of worldwide spread.

Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates that produce carbapenemases (KPCs) are rapidly disseminating worldwide. To determine their genetic background, we investigated 16 bla_KPC-2-harboring K. pneumoniae isolates from 5 countries. The isolates were multidrug resistant, possessed the bla_KPC-2 gene, and differed by additional β-lactamase content. They harbored a naturally chromosome-encoded bla gene (bla_SHV-1 [12.5%], bla_SHV-11 [68.7%], or bla_OKP-A/B [18.8%]) and several acquired and plasmid-encoded genes (bla_TEM-1 [81.3%], bla_CTX-M-2 [31.3%], bla_CTX-M-12 [12.5%], bla_CTX-M-15 [18.7%], and bla_OXA-9 [37.5%]). The bla_KPC-2 gene was always associated with 1 of the Tn4401 isoforms (a, b, or c). Tn4401 was inserted on different-sized plasmids that belonged to different incompatibility groups. Several bla_KPC-containing K. pneumoniae clones were found: 9 different pulsotypes with 1 major (sequence type 258) and 7 minor distinct allelic profiles. Different clones harboring different plasmids but having identical genetic structure, Tn4401, could be at the origin of the worldwide spread of this emerging resistance gene.