Multi-omics analyses of MEN1 missense mutations identify disruption of menin-MLL and menin-JunD interactions as critical requirements for molecular pathogenicity

Background

Loss-of-function mutations of the multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1) gene are causal to the MEN1 tumor syndrome, but they are also commonly found in sporadic pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors and other types of cancers. The MEN1 gene product, menin, is involved in transcriptional and chromatin regulation, most prominently as an integral component of KMT2A/MLL1 and KMT2B/MLL2 containing COMPASS-like histone H3K4 methyltransferase complexes. In a mutually exclusive fashion, menin also interacts with the JunD subunit of the AP-1 and ATF/CREB transcription factors.

Results

Here, we applied and in silico screening approach for 253 disease-related MEN1 missense mutations in order to select a set of nine menin mutations in surface-exposed residues. The protein interactomes of these mutants were assessed by quantitative mass spectrometry, which indicated that seven of the nine mutants disrupt interactions with both MLL1/MLL2 and JunD complexes. Interestingly, we identified three missense mutations, R52G, E255K and E359K, which predominantly reduce the MLL1 and MLL2 interactions when compared with JunD. This observation was supported by a pronounced loss of binding of the R52G, E255K and E359K mutant proteins at unique MLL1 genomic binding sites with less effect on unique JunD sites.

Conclusions

Our results underline the effects of MEN1 gene mutations in both familial and sporadic tumors of endocrine origin on the interactions of menin with the MLL1 and MLL2 histone H3K4 methyltransferase complexes and with JunD-containing transcription factors. Menin binding pocket mutants R52G, E255K and E359K have differential effects on MLL1/MLL2 and JunD interactions, which translate into differential genomic binding patterns. Our findings encourage future studies addressing the pathophysiological relevance of the separate MLL1/MLL2- and JunD-dependent functions of menin mutants in MEN1 disease model systems.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13072-022-00461-8.

Lipoprotein assembly and function in an evolutionary perspective

Circulatory fat transport in animals relies on members of the large lipid transfer protein (LLTP) superfamily, including mammalian apolipoprotein B (apoB) and insect apolipophorin II/I (apoLp-II/I). ApoB and apoLp-II/I, constituting the structural (non-exchangeable) basis for the assembly of various lipoproteins, acquire lipids through microsomal triglyceride-transfer protein, another LLTP family member, and bind them by means of amphipathic α-helical and β-sheet structural motifs. Comparative research reveals that LLTPs evolved from the earliest animals and highlights the structural adaptations in these lipid-binding proteins. Thus, in contrast to apoB, apoLp-II/I is cleaved post-translationally by a furin, resulting in the appearance of two non-exchangeable apolipoproteins in the single circulatory lipoprotein in insects, high-density lipophorin (HDLp). The remarkable structural similarities between mammalian and insect lipoproteins notwithstanding important functional differences relate to the mechanism of lipid delivery. Whereas in mammals, partial delipidation of apoB-containing lipoproteins eventually results in endocytic uptake of their remnants, mediated by members of the low-density lipoprotein receptor (LDLR) family, and degradation in lysosomes, insect HDLp functions as a reusable lipid shuttle capable of alternate unloading and reloading of lipid. Also, during muscular efforts (flight activity), an HDLp-based lipoprotein shuttle provides for the transport of lipid for energy generation. Although a lipophorin receptor - a homolog of LDLR - was identified that mediates endocytic uptake of HDLp during specific developmental periods, the endocytosed lipoprotein appears to be recycled in a transferrin-like manner. These data highlight that the functional adaptations in the lipoprotein lipid carriers in mammals and insects also emerge with regard to the functioning of their cognate receptors.

Insulin and chromium picolinate induce translocation of CD36 to the plasma membrane through different signaling pathways in 3T3-L1 adipocytes, and with a differential functionality of the CD36

Chromium picolinate (CrPic) has been indicated to activate glucose transporter 4 (GLUT4) trafficking to the plasma membrane (PM) to enhance glucose uptake in 3T3-L1 adipocytes. In skeletal and heart muscle cells, insulin directs the intracellular trafficking of the fatty acid translocase/CD36 to induce the uptake of cellular long-chain fatty acid (LCFA). The current study describes the effects of CrPic and insulin on the translocation of CD36 from intracellular storage pools to the PM in 3T3-L1 adipocytes in comparison with that of GLUT4. Immunofluorescence microscopy and immunoblotting revealed that both CD36 and GLUT4 were expressed and primarily located intracellularly in 3T3-L1 adipocytes. Upon insulin or CrPic stimulation, PM expression of CD36 increased in a similar manner as that for GLUT4; the CrPic-stimulated PM expression was less strong than that of insulin. The increase in PM localization for these two proteins by insulin paralleled LCFA ([1-(14)C]palmitate) or [(3)H]deoxyglucose uptake in 3T3-L1 adipocytes. The induction of the PM expression of GLUT4, but not CD36, or substrate uptake by insulin and CrPic appears to be additive in adipocytes. Furthermore, wortmannin completely inhibited the insulin-stimulated translocation of GLUT4 or CD36 and prevented the increased uptake of glucose or LCFA in these cells. Taken together, for the first time, these findings suggest that both insulin and CrPic induce CD36 translocation to the PM in 3T3-L1 adipocytes and that their translocation-inducing effects are not additive. The signaling pathway inducing the translocations is different, apparently resulting in a differential activity of CD36.

Locust flight activity as a model for hormonal regulation of lipid mobilization and transport

Flight activity of insects provides a fascinating yet relatively simple model system for studying the regulation of processes involved in energy metabolism. This is particularly highlighted during long-distance flight, for which the locust constitutes a long-standing favored model insect, which as one of the most infamous agricultural pests additionally has considerable economical importance. Remarkably many aspects and processes pivotal to our understanding of (neuro)hormonal regulation of lipid mobilization and transport during insect flight activity have been discovered in the locust; among which are the peptide adipokinetic hormones (AKHs), synthesized and stored by the neurosecretory cells of the corpus cardiacum, that regulate and integrate lipid (diacylglycerol) mobilization and transport, the functioning of the reversible conversions of lipoproteins (lipophorins) in the hemolymph during flight activity, revealing novel concepts for the transport of lipids in the circulatory system, and the structure and functioning of the exchangeable apolipopotein, apolipophorin III, which exhibits a dual capacity to exist in both lipid-bound and lipid-free states that is essential to these lipophorin conversions. Besides, the lipophorin receptor (LpR) was identified and characterized in the locust. In an integrative approach, this short review aims at highlighting the locust as an unrivalled model for studying (neuro)hormonal regulation of lipid mobilization and transport during insect flight activity, that additionally has offered a broad and profound research model for integrative physiology and biochemistry, and particularly focuses on recent developments in the concept of AKH-induced changes in the lipophorin system during locust flight, that deviates fundamentally from the lipoprotein-based transport of lipids in the circulation of mammals. Current studies in this field employing the locust as a model continue to attribute to its role as a favored model organism, but also reveal some disadvantages compared to model insects with a completely sequenced genome.

The E3 ubiquitin ligase IDOL induces the degradation of the low density lipoprotein receptor family members VLDLR and ApoER2

We have previously identified the E3 ubiquitin ligase-inducible degrader of the low density lipoprotein receptor (LDLR) (Idol) as a post-translational modulator of LDLR levels. Idol is a direct target for regulation by liver X receptors (LXRs), and its expression is responsive to cellular sterol status independent of the sterol-response element-binding proteins. Here we demonstrate that Idol also targets two closely related LDLR family members, VLDLR and ApoE receptor 2 (ApoER2), proteins implicated in both neuronal development and lipid metabolism. Idol triggers ubiquitination of the VLDLR and ApoER2 on their cytoplasmic tails, leading to their degradation. We further show that the level of endogenous VLDLR is sensitive to cellular sterol content, Idol expression, and activation of the LXR pathway. Pharmacological activation of the LXR pathway in mice leads to increased Idol expression and to decreased Vldlr levels in vivo. Finally, we establish an unexpected functional link between LXR and Reelin signaling. We demonstrate that LXR activation results in decreased Reelin binding to VLDLR and reduced Dab1 phosphorylation. The identification of VLDLR and ApoER2 as Idol targets suggests potential roles for this LXR-inducible E3 ligase in the central nervous system in addition to lipid metabolism.

Effects of AMPK activators on the sub-cellular distribution of fatty acid transporters CD36 and FABPpm

In heart and skeletal muscle, enhanced contractile activity induces an increase in the uptake of glucose and long-chain fatty acids (LCFA) via an AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK)-regulated mechanism. AMPK activation induces glucose uptake through translocation of glucose transporter 4 (GLUT4) from intracellular pools to the plasma membrane (PM). AMPK-mediated LCFA uptake has been suggested to be regulated by a similar translocation of the LCFA transporters CD36 and plasma membrane-associated fatty acid binding protein (FABPpm). In contrast to the well-characterized GLUT4 translocation, documentation of the proposed translocation of both LCFA transporters is rudimentary. Therefore, we adopted a cell culture system to investigate the localization of CD36 and FABPpm compared with GLUT4, in the absence and presence of AMPK activators oligomycin and AICAR. To this end, intact Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells stably expressing CD36 or myc-tagged GLUT4 (GLUT4myc) were used; FABPpm is endogenously expressed in CHO cells. Immuno-fluorescence microscopy revealed that CD36 PM localization resembled that of GLUT4, while FABPpm localized to other PM domains. Upon stimulation with oligomycin or AICAR, CD36 translocated (1.5-fold increase) to a PM location similar to that of GLUT4myc. In contrast, the PM FABPpm content did not change upon AMPK activation. Thus, for the first time in intact cells, we present evidence for AMPK-mediated translocation of CD36 from intracellular pools to the PM, similar to GLUT4, whereas FABPpm is not relocated.

Delipidation of insect lipoprotein, lipophorin, affects its binding to the lipophorin receptor, LpR: implications for the role of LpR-mediated endocytosis

The insect lipophorin receptor (LpR), an LDL receptor (LDLR) homologue that is expressed during restricted periods of insect development, binds and endocytoses high-density lipophorin (HDLp). However, in contrast to LDL, HDLp is not lysosomally degraded, but recycled in a transferrin-like manner, leaving a function of receptor-mediated uptake of HDLp to be uncovered. Since a hallmark of circulatory HDLp is its ability to function as a reusable shuttle that selectively loads and unloads lipids at target tissues without being endocytosed or degraded, circulatory HDLp can exist in several forms with respect to lipid loading. To investigate whether lipid content of the lipoprotein affects binding and subsequent endocytosis by LpR, HDLp was partially delipidated in vitro by incubation with alpha-cyclodextrin, yielding a particle of buoyant density 1.17g/mL (HDLp-1.17). Binding experiments demonstrated that LpR bound HDLp-1.17 with a substantially higher affinity than HDLp both in LpR-transfected Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells and isolated insect fat body tissue endogenously expressing LpR. Similar to HDLp, HDLp-1.17 was targeted to the endocytic recycling compartment after endocytosis in CHO(LpR) cells. The complex of HDLp-1.17 and LpR appeared to be resistant to endosomal pH, as was recently demonstrated for the LpR-HDLp complex, corroborating that HDLp-1.17 is recycled similar to HDLp. This conclusion was further supported by the observation of a significant decrease with time of HDLp-1.17-containing vesicles after endocytosis of HDLp-1.17 in LpR-expressing insect fat body tissue. Collectively, our results indicate that LpR favors the binding and subsequent endocytosis of HDLp-1.17 over HDLp, suggesting a physiological role for LpR in selective endocytosis of relatively lipid-unloaded HDLp particles, while lipid reloading during their intracellular itinerary might result in decreased affinity for LpR and thus allows recycling.

Circulatory lipid transport: lipoprotein assembly and function from an evolutionary perspective

Circulatory transport of neutral lipids (fat) in animals relies on members of the large lipid transfer protein (LLTP) superfamily, including mammalian apolipoprotein B (apoB) and insect apolipophorin II/I (apoLp-II/I). Latter proteins, which constitute the structural basis for the assembly of various lipoproteins, acquire lipids through microsomal triglyceride transfer protein (MTP)--another LLTP family member--and bind them by means of amphipathic structures. Comparative research reveals that LLTPs have evolved from the earliest animals and additionally highlights the structural and functional adaptations in these lipid carriers. For instance, in contrast to mammalian apoB, the insect apoB homologue, apoLp-II/I, is post-translationally cleaved by a furin, resulting in their appearance of two non-exchangeable apolipoproteins in the insect low-density lipoprotein (LDL) homologue, high-density lipophorin (HDLp). An important difference between mammalian and insect lipoproteins relates to the mechanism of lipid delivery. Whereas in mammals, endocytic uptake of lipoprotein particles, mediated via members of the LDL receptor (LDLR) family, results in their degradation in lysosomes, the insect HDLp was shown to act as a reusable lipid shuttle which is capable of reloading lipid. Although the recent identification of a lipophorin receptor (LpR), a homologue of LDLR, reveals that endocytic uptake of HDLp may constitute an additional mechanism of lipid delivery, the endocytosed lipoprotein appears to be recycled in a transferrin-like manner. Binding studies indicate that the HDLp-LpR complex, in contrast to the LDL-LDLR complex, is resistant to dissociation at endosomal pH as well as by treatment with EDTA mimicking the drop in Ca(2+) concentration in the endosome. This remarkable stability of the ligand-receptor complex may provide a crucial key to the recycling mechanism. Based on the binding and dissociation capacities of mutant and hybrid receptors, the specific binding interaction of the ligand-binding domain of the receptor with HDLp was characterized. These structural similarities and functional adaptations of the lipid transport systems operative in mammals and insects are discussed from an evolutionary perspective.

Insect lipoprotein biogenesis depends on an amphipathic β cluster in apolipophorin II/I and is stimulated by microsomal triglyceride transfer protein

Lipoproteins transport lipids in the circulation of an evolutionally wide diversity of animals. The pathway for lipoprotein biogenesis has been revealed to a large extent in mammals only, in which apolipoprotein B (apoB) acquires lipids via the assistance of microsomal triglyceride transfer protein (MTP) and binds them by means of amphipathic protein structures. To investigate whether this is a common mechanism for lipoprotein biogenesis in animals, we studied the structural elements involved in the assembly of the insect lipoprotein, lipophorin. LOCATE sequence analysis predicted that the insect lipoprotein precursor, apolipophorin II/I (apoLp-II/I), contains clusters of amphipathic alpha-helices and beta-strands, organized along the protein as N-alpha(1)-beta-alpha(2)-C, reminiscent of a truncated form of apoB. Recombinant expression of a series of C-terminal truncation variants of Locusta migratoria apoLp-II/I in an insect cell (Sf9) expression system revealed that the formation of a buoyant high density lipoprotein requires the amphipathic beta cluster. Coexpression of apoLp-II/I with the MTP homolog of Drosophila melanogaster affected insect lipoprotein biogenesis quantitatively as well as qualitatively, as the secretion of apoLp-II/I proteins was increased several-fold and the buoyant density of the secreted lipoprotein decreased concomitantly, indicative of augmented lipidation. Based on these findings, we propose that, despite specific modifications, the assembly of lipoproteins involves MTP as well as amphipathic structures in the apolipoprotein carrier, both in mammals and insects. Thus, lipoprotein biogenesis in animals appears to rely on structural elements that are of early metazoan origin.

Molecular diversity and evolution of the large lipid transfer protein superfamily

Circulatory lipid transport in animals is mediated to a substantial extent by members of the large lipid transfer (LLT) protein (LLTP) superfamily. These proteins, including apolipoprotein B (apoB), bind lipids and constitute the structural basis for the assembly of lipoproteins. The current analyses of sequence data indicate that LLTPs are unique to animals and that these lipid binding proteins evolved in the earliest multicellular animals. In addition, two novel LLTPs were recognized in insects. Structural and phylogenetic analyses reveal three major families of LLTPs: the apoB-like LLTPs, the vitellogenin-like LLTPs, and the microsomal triglyceride transfer protein (MTP)-like LLTPs, or MTPs. The latter are ubiquitous, whereas the two other families are distributed differentially between animal groups. Besides similarities, remarkable variations are also found among LLTPs in their major lipid-binding sites (i.e., the LLT module as well as the predicted clusters of amphipathic secondary structure): variations such as protein modification and number, size, or occurrence of the clusters. Strikingly, comparative research has also highlighted a multitude of functions for LLTPs in addition to circulatory lipid transport. The integration of LLTP structure, function, and evolution reveals multiple adaptations, which have come about in part upon neofunctionalization of duplicated genes. Moreover, the change, exchange, and expansion of functions illustrate the opportune application of lipid-binding proteins in nature. Accordingly, comparative research exposes the structural and functional adaptations in animal lipid carriers and brings up novel possibilities for the manipulation of lipid transport.

Sequence analysis of the non-recurring C-terminal domains shows that insect lipoprotein receptors constitute a distinct group of LDL receptor family members

Lipoprotein-mediated delivery of lipids in mammals involves endocytic receptors of the low density lipoprotein (LDL) receptor (LDLR) family. In contrast, in insects, the lipoprotein, lipophorin (Lp), functions as a reusable lipid shuttle in lipid delivery, and these animals, therefore, were not supposed to use endocytic receptors. However, recent data indicate additional endocytic uptake of Lp, mediated by a Lp receptor (LpR) of the LDLR family. The two N-terminal domains of LDLR family members are involved in ligand binding and dissociation, respectively, and are composed of a mosaic of multiple repeats. The three C-terminal domains, viz., the optional O-linked glycosylation domain, the transmembrane domain, and the intracellular domain, are of a non-repetitive sequence. The present classification of newly discovered LDLR family members, including the LpRs, bears no relevance to physiological function. Therefore, as a novel approach, the C-terminal domains of LDLR family members across the entire animal kingdom were used to perform a sequence comparison analysis in combination with a phylogenetic tree analysis. The LpRs appeared to segregate into a specific group distinct from the groups encompassing the other family members, and each of the three C-terminal domains of the insect receptors is composed of unique set of sequence motifs. Based on conservation of sequence motifs and organization of these motifs in the domains, LpR resembles most the groups of the LDLRs, very low density lipoprotein (VLDL) receptors, and vitellogenin receptors. However, in sequence aspects in which LpR deviates from these three receptor groups, it most notably resembles LDLR-related protein-2, or megalin. These features might explain the functional differences disclosed between insect and mammalian lipoprotein receptors.

Lipoprotein-mediated lipid transport in insects: analogy to the mammalian lipid carrier system and novel concepts for the functioning of LDL receptor family members

In all animals, lipoproteins are used to transport lipids through the aqueous circulation. Lipids are delivered to mammalian cells by two different mechanisms: via endocytic uptake of the complete lipoprotein particle mediated by members of the low density lipoprotein (LDL) receptor (LDLR) family, or by selective delivery of lipoprotein-carried lipids at the cell surface, such as lipid uptake following the action of a lipoprotein lipase. Although many structural elements of the lipid transport system of insects are similar to those of mammals, insect lipoprotein-mediated lipid transport was thought to apply only to the latter concept, since the single lipoprotein acts as a reusable lipid shuttle. However, the recent identification of lipoprotein receptors of the LDLR family in insects suggests that lipid transport in these animals may also adopt the first concept. Yet, the endocytic properties of the insect LDLR homologue appear to deviate from those of the mammalian LDLR family members, resulting in the recycling of endocytosed lipoprotein in a transferrin-like manner. This indicates that a hitherto unknown as well as unexpected function can be added to the plethora of functions of LDLR family members. Analysis of the molecular mechanism of the ligand-recycling function of the insect receptor provides also new insight into the possible functioning of the mammalian family members. In the last several years, mammalian and insect lipoprotein-mediated lipid transport systems have been reviewed separately with respect to functioning and lipid delivery. This review, in which new and important developments in the insect field with respect to our understanding of lipid delivery are discussed with a particular focus on the involvement of the LDLR homologue, aims at comparing the two systems, also from an evolutionary biological perspective, and proposes that the two systems are more similar than assumed previously.

Intracellular fate of LDL receptor family members depends on the cooperation between their ligand-binding and EGF domains

The insect low-density lipoprotein (LDL) receptor (LDLR) homologue LpR mediates endocytosis of an insect lipoprotein (lipophorin) that is structurally related to LDL. Despite these similarities, lipophorin and LDL follow distinct intracellular routes upon endocytosis by their receptors. Whereas LDL is degraded in lysosomes, lipophorin is recycled in a transferrin-like manner. We constructed several hybrid receptors composed of Locusta migratoria LpR and human LDLR regions to identify the domains implicated in LpR-mediated ligand recycling. Additionally, the triadic His562 residue of LDLR, which is putatively involved in ligand uncoupling, was mutated to Asn, corresponding to Asn643 in LpR, to analyse the role of the His triad in receptor functioning. The familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH) class 5 mutants LDLRH562Y and LDLRH190Y were also analysed in vitro. Fluorescence microscopic investigation and quantification suggest that LpR-mediated ligand recycling involves cooperation between the ligand-binding domain and epidermal growth factor (EGF) domain of LpR, whereas its cytosolic tail does not harbour motifs that affect this process. LDLR residue His562 appears to be essential for LDLR recycling after ligand endocytosis but not for constitutive receptor recycling. Like LDLRH562N, LDLRH562Y did not recycle bound ligand; moreover, the intracellular distribution of both mutant receptors after ligand incubation coincides with that of a lysosomal marker. The LDLR mutant characterization in vitro suggests that LDLR FH class 5 mutations might be divided into two subclasses.

Biosynthesis and secretion of insect lipoprotein: involvement of furin in cleavage of the apoB homolog, apolipophorin-II/I

The biosynthesis of neutral fat-transporting lipoproteins involves the lipidation of their nonexchangeable apolipoprotein. In contrast to its mammalian homolog apolipoprotein B, however, insect apolipophorin-II/I (apoLp-II/I) is cleaved posttranslationally at a consensus substrate sequence for furin, resulting in the appearance of two apolipoproteins in insect lipoprotein. To characterize the cleavage process, a truncated cDNA encoding the N-terminal 38% of Locusta migratoria apoLp-II/I, including the cleavage site, was expressed in insect Sf9 cells. This resulted in the secretion of correctly processed apoLp-II and truncated apoLp-I. The cleavage could be impaired by the furin inhibitor decanoyl-Arg-Val-Lys-Arg-chloromethyl ketone (decRVKRcmk) as well as by mutagenesis of the consensus substrate sequence for furin, as indicated by the secretion of uncleaved apoLp-II/I-38. Treatment of L. migratoria fat body, the physiological site of lipoprotein biosynthesis, with decRVKRcmk similarly resulted in the secretion of uncleaved apoLp-II/I, which was integrated in lipoprotein particles of buoyant density identical to wild-type high density lipophorin (HDLp). These results show that apoLp-II/I is posttranslationally cleaved by an insect furin and that biosynthesis and secretion of HDLp can occur independent of this processing step. Structure modeling indicates that the cleavage of apoLp-II/I represents a molecular adaptation in homologous apolipoprotein structures. We propose that cleavage enables specific features of insect lipoproteins, such as low density lipoprotein formation, endocytic recycling, and involvement in coagulation.

Receptor-mediated endocytosis and intracellular trafficking of lipoproteins and transferrin in insect cells

While the intracellular pathways of ligands after receptor-mediated endocytosis have been studied extensively in mammalian cells, in insect cells these pathways are largely unknown. We transfected Drosophila Schneider line 2 (S2) cells with the human low-density lipoprotein (LDL) receptor (LDLR) and transferrin (Tf) receptor (TfR), and used endocytosis of LDL and Tf as markers. After endocytosis in mammalian cells, LDL is degraded in lysosomes, whereas Tf is recycled. Fluorescence microscopy analysis revealed that LDL and Tf are internalized by S2 cells transfected with LDLR or TfR, respectively. In transfectants simultaneously expressing LDLR and TfR, both ligands colocalize in endosomes immediately after endocytic uptake, and their location remained unchanged after a chase. Similar results were obtained with Spodoptera frugiperda Sf9 cells that were transfected with TfR, suggesting that Tf is retained intracellularly by both cell lines. The insect lipoprotein, lipophorin, is recycled upon lipophorin receptor (LpR)-mediated endocytosis by mammalian cells, however, not after endocytosis by LpR-expressing S2 transfectants, suggesting that this recycling mechanism is cell-type specific. LpR is endogenously expressed by fat body tissue of Locusta migratoria for a limited period after an ecdysis. A chase following endocytosis of labeled lipophorin by isolated fat body tissue at this developmental stage resulted in a significant decrease of lipophorin-containing vesicles, indicative of recycling of the ligand.

Lipophorin receptor-mediated lipoprotein endocytosis in insect fat body cells

High-density lipophorin (HDLp) in the circulation of insects is able to selectively deliver lipids to target tissues in a nonendocytic manner. In Locusta migratoria, a member of the LDL receptor family has been identified and shown to mediate endocytosis of HDLp in mammalian cells transfected with the cDNA of this receptor. This insect lipophorin receptor (iLR) is temporally expressed in fat body tissue of young adult as well as larval locusts, as shown by Western blot analysis. Fluorescence microscopy revealed that fat body cells internalize fluorescently labeled HDLp and human receptor-associated protein only when iLR is expressed. Expression of iLR is down-regulated on Day 4 after an ecdysis. Consequently, HDLp is no longer internalized. By starving adult locusts immediately after ecdysis, we were able to prolong iLR expression. In addition, expression of the receptor was induced by starving adults after down-regulation of iLR. These results suggest that iLR mediates endocytosis of HDLp in fat body cells, and that expression of iLR is regulated by the demand of fat body tissue for lipids.

Insect lipoprotein follows a transferrin-like recycling pathway that is mediated by the insect LDL receptor homologue

The lipoprotein of insects, high-density lipophorin (HDLp), is homologous to that of mammalian low-density lipoprotein (LDL) with respect to its apolipoprotein structure. Moreover, an endocytic receptor for HDLp has been identified (insect lipophorin receptor, iLR) that is homologus to the LDL receptor. We transfected LDL-receptor-expressing CHO cells with iLR cDNA to study the endocytic uptake and intracellular pathways of LDL and HDLp simultaneously. Our studies provide evidence that these mammalian and insect lipoproteins follow distinct intracellular routes after receptor-mediated endocytosis. Multicolour imaging and immunofluorescence was used to visualize the intracellular trafficking of fluorescently labeled ligands in these cells. Upon internalization, which can be completely inhibited by human receptor-associated protein (RAP), mammalian and insect lipoproteins share endocytic vesicles. Subsequently, however, HDLp evacuates the LDL-containing endosomes. In contrast to LDL, which is completely degraded in lysosomes after dissociating from its receptor, both HDLp and iLR converge in a nonlysosomal juxtanuclear compartment. Colocalization studies with transferrin identified this organelle as the endocytic recycling compartment via which iron-depleted transferrin exits the cell. Fluorescently labeled RAP is also transported to this recycling organelle upon receptor-mediated endocytosis by iLR. Internalized HDLp eventually exits the cell via the recycling compartment, a process that can be blocked by monensin, and is re-secreted with a t(1/2) of approximately 13 minutes. From these observations, we conclude that HDLp is the first non-exchangeable apolipoprotein-containing lipoprotein that follows a transferrin-like recycling pathway despite the similarities between mammalian and insect lipoproteins and their receptors.

Alternative lipid mobilization: the insect shuttle system

Lipid mobilization in long-distance flying insects has revealed a novel concept for lipid transport in the circulatory system during exercise. Similar to energy generation for sustained locomotion in mammals, the work accomplished by non-stop flight activity is powered by oxidation of free fatty acids (FFA) derived from endogenous reserves of triacylglycerol. The transport form of the lipid, however, is diacylglycerol (DAG), which is delivered to the flight muscles associated with lipoproteins. In the insect system, the multifunctional lipoprotein, high-density lipophorin (HDLp) is loaded with DAG while additionally, multiple copies of the exchangeable apolipoprotein, apoLp-III, associate with the expanding particle. As a result, lipid-enriched low-density lipophorin (LDLp) is formed. At the flight muscles, LDLp-carried DAG is hydrolyzed and FFA are imported into the muscle cells for energy generation. The depletion of DAG from LDLp results in the recovery of both HDLp and apoLp-III, HDLp, identified which are reutilized for another cycle of DAG transport. A receptor for as a novel member of the vertebrate low-density lipoprotein (LDL) receptor family, does not seem to be involved in the lipophorin shuttle mechanism operative during flight activity. In addition, endocytosis of HDLp mediated by the insect receptor does not seem to follow the classical mammalian LDL pathway. Many structural elements of the lipid mobilization system in insects are similar to those in mammals. Domain structures of apoLp-I and apoLp-II, the non-exchangeable apolipoprotein components of HDLp, are related to apoB 100. ApoLp-III is a bundle of five amphipathic alpha-helices that binds to a lipid surface very similar to the four-helix bundle of the N-terminal domain of human apoE. Despite these similarities, the functioning of the insect lipoprotein in energy transport during flight activity is intriguingly different, since the TAG-rich mammalian lipoproteins play no role as a carrier of mobilized lipids during exercise and besides, these lipoproteins are not functioning as a reusable shuttle for lipid transport. On the other hand, the deviant behavior of similar molecules in a different biological system may provide a useful alternative model for studying the molecular basis of processes related to human disorders and disease.

The role of beta-strand 5A of plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 in regulation of its latency transition and inhibitory activity by vitronectin

Plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) is a potential target for anti-thrombotic and anti-cancer therapy. It circulates in plasma in a complex with vitronectin (VN). We have studied biochemical mechanisms for PAI-1 neutralisation and its modulation by VN, using site-directed mutagenesis and limited proteolysis. We demonstrate that VN, besides delaying conversion of PAI-1 to the inactive latent form, also protects PAI-1 against cold- and detergent-induced substrate behaviour and counteracts conversion of PAI-1 to inert forms by certain amphipathic organochemical compounds. VN protection against cold- and detergent-induced substrate behaviour is associated with inhibition of the proteolytic susceptibility of beta-strand 5A. Alanine substitution of a lysine residue placed centrally in beta-strand 5A implied a VN-induced acceleration of latency transition, instead of the normal delay. This substitution not only protects PAI-1 against neutralisation, but also counteracts VN-induced protection against neutralisation. We conclude that beta-strand 5A plays a crucial role in VN-regulation of PAI-1 activity.

Vitronectin and substitution of a beta-strand 5A lysine residue potentiate activity-neutralization of PA inhibitor-1 by monoclonal antibodies against alpha-helix F

Some monoclonal antibodies against plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) are able to inhibit its reaction with its target proteinases. We have characterized the effect on PAI-1 of two monoclonal antibodies, Mab-2 and Mab-6, with overlapping epitopes in a sequence encompassing beta-strand 1A, alpha-helix F, and the loop connecting alpha-helix F and beta-strand 3A (the hF/s3A loop). Mab-2 reduced the inhibitory activity of wild type PAI-1 and almost totally abolished the inhibitory activity of a PAI-1 variant harboring an Ala substitution of Lys 325 (335 in the alpha1-proteinase inhibitor template residue numbering) in beta-strand 5A. In both cases, the neutralizing effect of the antibody was strongly potentiated by vitronectin. Mab-6 had no effect on wild type PAI-1, but reduced the inhibitory activity of the K325A variant. The effect of Mab-6 was not potentiated by vitronectin. With both Mab-2 and Mab-6, the neutralization of PAI-1 activity was associated with PAI-1 substrate behaviour. Mab-2, but not Mab-6, prevented vitronectin from rescuing PAI-1 from cold-induced substrate behaviour. We propose that the antibodies act by weakening the anchoring of alpha-helix F to the adjacent structures, resulting in an increased flexibility of beta-strand 5A and the hF/s3A loop and a changed conformational response to the binding of vitronectin in the alpha-helix E region. The potentiating effect of vitronectin on neutralization of PAI-1 by antibodies is a novel concept in the development of compounds for neutralizing PAI-1 in vivo.

Specific inhibition of barley alpha-amylase 2 by barley alpha-amylase/subtilisin inhibitor depends on charge interactions and can be conferred to isozyme 1 by mutation

alpha-Amylase 2 (AMY2) and alpha-amylase/subtilisin inhibitor (BASI) from barley bind with Ki = 0.22 nM. AMY2 is a (beta/alpha)8-barrel enzyme and the segment Leu116-Phe143 in domain B (Val89-Ile152), protruding at beta-strand 3 of the (beta/alpha)8-barrel, was shown using isozyme hybrids to be crucial for the specificity of the inhibitor for AMY2. In the AMY2-BASI crystal structure [F. Vallée, A. Kadziola, Y. Bourne, M. Juy, K. W. Rodenburg, B. Svensson & R. Haser (1998) Structure 6, 649-659] Arg128AMY2 forms a hydrogen bond with Ser77BASI, while Asp142AMY2 makes a salt-bridge with Lys140BASI. These two enzyme residues are substituted by glutamine and asparagine, respectively, to assess their contribution in binding of the inhibitor. These mutations were performed in the well-expressed, inhibitor-sensitive hybrid barley alpha-amylase 1 (AMY1)-(1-90)/AMY2-(90-403) with Ki = 0.33 nM, because of poor production of AMY2 in yeast. In addition Arg128, only found in AMY2, was introduced into an AMY1 context by the mutation T129R/K130P in the inhibitor-insensitive hybrid AMY1-(1-161)/AMY2-(161-403). The binding energy was reduced by 2.7-3.0 kcal.mol-1 as determined from Ki after the mutations R128Q and D142N. This corresponds to loss of a charged interaction between the protein molecules. In contrast, sensitivity to the inhibitor was gained (Ki = 7 microM) by the mutation T129R/K130P in the insensitive isozyme hybrid. Charge screening raised Ki 14-20-fold for this latter mutant, AMY2, and the sensitive isozyme hybrid, but only twofold for the R128Q and D142N mutants. Thus electrostatic stabilization was effectively introduced and lost in the different mutant enzyme-inhibitor complexes and rational engineering using an inhibitor recognition motif to confer binding to the inhibitor mimicking the natural AMY2-BASI complex.

Engineering of conformations of plasminogen activator inhibitor-1. A crucial role of beta-strand 5A residues in the transition of active form to latent and substrate forms

The serpin (serine proteinase inhibitor) family is of general protein chemical interest because of its ability to undergo large conformational changes, in which the surface-exposed reactive centre loop (RCL) is inserted as strand 4 in the large central beta-sheet A. Loop insertion is an integral part of the inhibitory mechanism and also takes place at conversion of serpins to the latent state, occurring spontaneously only in plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1). We have investigated the importance of beta-strand 5A residues for the activity and latency transition of PAI-1. An approximately fourfold increase in the rate of latency transition resulted from His-substitution of Gln324 (position 334 in the alpha(1)-proteinase inhibitor template numbering), which interacts with the underlying alpha-helix B. The side chains of Gln321 and Lys325 (template residues 331 and 335, respectively) form hydrogen bonds to the peptide backbone of a loop connecting alpha-helix F and beta-strand 3A. While substitution with Ala of Glu321 had only minor effects on the properties of PAI-1, substitution with Ala of Lys325 led to stabilization of the inhibitory activity at incubation conditions leading to conversion of wild-type PAI-1 to a substrate form, and to an anomalous reaction towards a monoclonal antibody, which induced a delay in the latency transition of the mutant, but not wild-type PAI-1. We conclude that the anchoring of beta-strand 5A plays a crucial role in loop insertion. These findings provide new information about the mechanism of an important example of protein conformational changes.

Solvent effects on activity and conformation of plasminogen activator inhibitor-1

We have studied effects of the solvent composition on the activity and the conformation of human plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) from HT-1080 fibrosarcoma cells. Non-ionic detergents, includine Triton X-100, reduced the inhibitory activity of PAI-1 more than 20-fold at 0 degrees C, but less than 2-fold at 37 degrees C, while glycerol partly prevented the detergent-induced activity-loss at 0 degrees C. The activity-loss was associated with an increase in PAI-1 substrate behaviour. Evaluating the PAI-1 conformation by proteolytic susceptibility of specific peptide bonds, we found that the V8-proteinase susceptibility of the Glu332-Ser333 (P17-P16) bond, part of the hinge between the reactive centre loop (RCL) and beta-strand 5A, and the endoproteinase Asp-N susceptibility of several bonds in the beta-strand 2A-alpha-helix E region were increased by detergents at both 0 and 37 degrees C. The susceptibility of the Gin321-Ala322 and the Lys325-Val326 bonds in beta-strand 5A to papain and trypsin, respectively, was increased by detergents at 0 degrees C, but not at 37 degrees C, showing a strict correlation between proteinase susceptibility of beta-strand 5A and activity-loss at 0 degrees C. Since the beta-strand 2A-alpha-helix E region also showed differential susceptibility to endoproteinase Asp-N in latent, active, and reactive centre-cleaved PAI-1, we propose that a detergent-induced conformational change of the beta-strand 2A-alpha-helix E region influences the movements of beta-sheet A, resulting in a cold-induced conformational change of beta-strand 5A and thereby an increased substrate behaviour at low temperatures. These results provide new information about the structural basis for serpin substrate behaviour.

Barley alpha-amylase bound to its endogenous protein inhibitor BASI: crystal structure of the complex at 1.9 A resolution

BACKGROUND

Barley alpha-amylase is a 45 kDa enzyme which is involved in starch degradation during barley seed germination. The released sugars provide the plant embryo with energy for growth. The major barley alpha-amylase isozyme (AMY2) binds with high affinity to the endogenous inhibitor BASI (barley alpha-amylase/subtilisin inhibitor) whereas the minor isozyme (AMY1) is not inhibited. BASI is a 19.6 kDa bifunctional protein that can simultaneously inhibit AMY2 and serine proteases of the subtilisin family. This inhibitor may therefore prevent degradation of the endosperm starch during premature sprouting and protect the seed from attack by pathogens secreting proteases.

RESULTS

The crystal structure of AMY2 in complex with BASI was determined and refined at 1.9 A resolution. BASI consists of a 12-stranded beta-barrel structure which belongs to the beta-trefoil fold family and inhibits AMY2 by sterically occluding access of the substrate to the active site of the enzyme. The AMY2-BASI complex is characterized by an unusual completely solvated calcium ion located at the protein-protein interface.

CONCLUSIONS

The AMY2-BASI complex represents the first reported structure of an endogenous protein-protein complex from a higher plant. The structure of the complex throws light on the strict specificity of BASI for AMY2, and shows that domain B of AMY2 contributes greatly to the specificity of enzyme-inhibitor recognition. In contrast to the three-dimensional structures of porcine pancreatic alpha-amylase in complex with proteinaceous inhibitors, the AMY2-BASI structure reveals that the catalytically essential amino acid residues of the enzyme are not directly bound to the inhibitor. Binding of BASI to AMY2 creates a cavity, exposed to the external medium, that is ideally shaped to accommodate an extra calcium ion. This feature may contribute to the inhibitory effect, as the key amino acid sidechains of the active site are in direct contact with water molecules which are in turn ligated to the calcium ion.

An ester bond linking a fragment of a serine proteinase to its serpin inhibitor

Most known members of the serpin superfamily are serine proteinase inhibitors. Serpins are therefore important regulators of blood coagulation, complement activation, fibrinolysis, and turnover of extracellular matrix. Serpins form SDS-resistant complexes of 1:1 stoichiometry with their target proteinases by reaction of their P1-P1' peptide bond with the active site of the proteinases. The nature of the interactions responsible for the high stability of the complexes is a controversial issue. We subjected the complex between the serine proteinase urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA) and the serpin plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) to proteolytic digestion under nondenaturing conditions. The complex could be degraded to a fragment containing two disulfide-linked peptides from uPA, one of which included the active site Ser, while PAI-1 was left undegraded. By further proteolytic digestion after denaturation and reduction, it was also possible to degrade the PAI-1 moiety, and we isolated a fragment containing 10 amino acids from uPA, encompassing the active site Ser, and 6 amino acids from PAI-1, including the P1 Arg. Characterization of the fragment gave results fully in agreement with the hypothesis that it contained an ester bond between the hydroxyl group of the active site Ser and the carboxyl group of the P1 Arg. These data for the first time provide direct evidence that serine proteinases are entrapped at an acyl intermediate stage in serine proteinase-serpin complexes.

Binding of urokinase-type plasminogen activator-plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 complex to the endocytosis receptors alpha2-macroglobulin receptor/low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein and very-low-density lipoprotein receptor involves basic residues in the inhibitor

The complex of the type-1 plasminogen activator inhibitor (PAI-1) and its target proteinases, the urokinase and tissue-type plasminogen activators (uPA and tPA), but not the free components, bind with high affinity to the endocytosis receptors alpha2-macroglobulin receptor/low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein (alpha2MR/LRP) and very-low-density lipoprotein receptor (VLDLR). To characterize the molecular interaction between the complexes and the receptors, alanine codons were introduced into the human PAI-1 cDNA to replace the four basic residues, Arg-78, Lys-82, Arg-120 and Lys-124, as double mutations. The purified recombinant mutant proteins, rPAI-1/R78A-K124A and rPAI-1/K82A-R120A, produced by the yeast Pichia pastoris, were indistinghuisable from wild-type recombinant and natural human PAI-1 with respect to inhibitory activity against uPA, stability of SDS-resistant complexes with uPA, and vitronectin binding. Radiolabelled mutant uPA.PAI-1 complexes bound with a 10- to 20-fold, and 3- to 7-fold reduced affinity to purified alpha2MR/LRP and VLDLR respectively. alpha2MR/LRP-mediated endocytosis of the mutant complexes by COS-1 cells was reduced to 48 and 38% of the level of endocytosis of wild-type PAI-1. Binding of the mutant complexes to the uPA receptor was not affected. These findings suggest that the binding mode of the uPA.PAI-1 complex to both alpha2MR/LRP and VLDLR is similar. The four residues are surface exposed in the region defined by alpha-helix D and beta-strand 1A in the serine protease inhibitor (serpin) structure. Our study represents the first identification of residues in a surface region implicated in molecular recognition of protease.serpin complexes by endocytosis receptors of the low-density lipoprotein receptor family.

Type-1 plasminogen-activator inhibitor -- conformational differences between latent, active, reactive-centre-cleaved and plasminogen-activator-complexed forms, as probed by proteolytic susceptibility

We have analysed the susceptibility of latent, active, reactive-centre-cleaved and plasminogen-activator-complexed type-1 plasminogen-activator inhibitor (PAI-1) to the non-target proteinases trypsin, endoproteinase Asp-N, proteinase K and subtilisin. This analysis has allowed us to detect conformational differences between the different forms of PAI-1 outside the reactive-centre loop and beta-sheet A. Proteinase-hypersensitive sites were clustered in three regions. Firstly, susceptibility was observed in the region around alpha-helix E, beta-strand 1A, and the flanking loops, which are believed to form flexible joints during movements of beta-sheet A. Secondly, hypersensitive sites were observed in the loop between alpha-helix I and beta-strand 5A. Thirdly, the gate region, encompassing beta-strands 3C and 4C, was highly susceptible to trypsin in latent PAI-1, but not in the other conformations. The digestion patterns differed among all four forms of PAI-1, indicating that each represents a unique conformation. The differential proteolytic susceptibility of the flexible-joint region may be coupled to the differential affinity to vitronectin, binding in the same region. The analysis also allowed detection of conformational differences between reactive-centre-cleaved forms produced under different solvent conditions. The digestion pattern of plasminogen-activator-complexed PAI-1 was different from that of active PAI-1, but indistinguishable from that of one of the reactive-centre-cleaved forms, as the complexed and this particular cleaved PAI-1 were completely resistant to all the non-target proteinases tested. This observation is in agreement with the notion that complex formation involves reactive-centre cleavage and a large degree of insertion of the reactive-centre loop into beta-sheet A. Our analysis has allowed the identification of some flexible regions that appear to be implicated in the conformational changes during the movements of beta-sheet A and during the inhibitory reaction of serpins with their target proteinases.

Plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 represses integrin- and vitronectin-mediated cell migration independently of its function as an inhibitor of plasminogen activation

Cell migration involves the integrins, their extracellular matrix ligands, and pericellular proteolytic enzyme systems. We have studied the role of plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) in cell migration, using human amnion WISH cells and human epidermoid carcinoma HEp-2 cells in an assay measuring migration from microcarrier beads and a modified Boyden-chamber assay. Active, but not latent or reactive center-cleaved, PAI-1 inhibited migration. A PAI-1 mutant without ability to inhibit plasminogen activation was as active as wild-type PAI-1 as a migration inhibitor, showing that inhibition of plasminogen activation was not involved. PAI-1 specifically interfered with intergrin- and vitronectin-mediated migration: Migration onto vitronectin-coated but not onto fibronectin-coated surfaces was inhibited by PAI-1, a cyclic RGD peptide inhibited migration, and both cell lines expressed vitronectin-binding alpha v-integrins. In addition, active PAI-1, but not latent or reactive center-cleaved PAI-1, inhibited vitronectin binding to integrins in an in vitro binding assay, without affecting binding of fibronectin. Monoclonal antibodies against the urokinase receptor, another vitronectin binding protein, did not affect cell migration in the beads assay, while some inhibitory effect was observed in the Boyden-chamber assay. We conclude that PAI-1, independently of its role as a proteinase inhibitor, inhibits cell migration by competing for vitronectin binding to integrins, while the interference of PAI-1 with binding of vitronectin to the urokinase receptor may play a secondary role. These data define a novel function for the serpin PAI-1, enabling it to regulate cell migration over vitronectin-rich extracellular matrix in the body.

Conformational changes of the reactive-centre loop and beta-strand 5A accompany temperature-dependent inhibitor-substrate transition of plasminogen-activator inhibitor 1

We have studied conformational changes of type-1 plasminogen-activator inhibitor (PAI-1) during a temperature-dependent inhibitor-substrate transition by measuring susceptibility of the molecule to non-target proteinases. When incubated at 0 degree C instead of the normally used 37 degrees C, a tenfold decrease in the specific inhibitory activity of active PAI-1 was observed. Accordingly, PAI-1 was recovered in a reactive-centre-cleaved form from incubations with urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA) and tissue-type plasminogen activator (tPA) at 0 degree C, but not at 37 degrees C. It thus behaved as a substrate for the target proteinases at the lower temperature. Active PAI-1 was exposed to a variety of non-target proteinases, including elastase, papain, thermolysin, trypsin, and V8 proteinase. It was found that specific peptide bonds in the reactive centre loop (RCL) and strand 5 in beta-sheet A (s5A) had a temperature-dependent proteolytic susceptibility, while the P17-P16 (E332-S333) bond, forming the hinge between s5A and the RCL, showed indistinguishable susceptibility to proteolysis by V8 proteinase at 0 degree and 37 degrees C. In latent and reactive-centre-cleaved PAI-1, all the bonds were resistant to proteolysis at the higher as well as the lower temperature. An anti-PAI-1 monoclonal antibody maintained the inhibitory activity of PAI-1 and prevented reactive centre cleavage at 0 degree C, and thus prevented substrate behaviour. Concomitantly, it caused specific changes in proteolytic susceptibility of s5A and the RCL, but it did not affect cleavage of the P17-P16 bond by V8 proteinase. Our observations suggest that temperature-dependent conformational changes of beta-sheet A and the RCL determine whether the serpin act as an inhibitor or a substrate. Furthermore they suggest that the RCL of PAI-1 is fully extracted from beta-sheet A in the inhibitory as well as in the substrate form, favoring a so-called induced conformational state model to explain why inhibitory activity requires partial insertion of the RCL into beta-sheet A.

Arg-27, Arg-127 and Arg-155 in the beta-trefoil protein barley alpha-amylase/subtilisin inhibitor are interface residues in the complex with barley alpha-amylase 2

Arginine residues in barley alpha-amylase/subtilisin inhibitor (BASI) involved in binding to barely alpha-amylase 2 (AMY2) were differentially labelled using AMY2 as protectant and phenylglyoxal (PGO) and [14C]PGO as modifying agents. Chymotryptic fragments of labelled BASI were purified by reverse-phase HPLC, and we concluded that the radiolabelled Arg-27, Arg-155 and most likely Arg-127, identified by amino acid, sequence and 14C analyses, are protected by AMY2. While Arg-106 and Arg-107 showed intermediate reactivity and apparently were only partly accessible, Arg-15, Arg-41 and Arg-61 reacted with PGO and were thus exposed in the BASI-AMY2 complex. Patterns of arginine modification by [14C]PGO in free or in AMY2-complexed BASI were consistent with the results of differential labelling. The AMY2-protected arginines in BASI are at a distance from each other, as deduced from crystal structures of different beta-trefoil proteins (Erythrina caffra and soybean trypsin inhibitors, interleukin-1 alpha and -1 beta and WASI, the wheat homologue), suggesting that the BASI-AMY2 complex has multiple contacts at a larger interface. Accordingly, 11-16-residue-long BASI oligopeptides synthesized to include Arg-27, Arg-106/Arg-107 or Arg-127 were unable to suppress the formation of BASI-AMY2 or the effect of an inhibitory monoclonal antibody to BASI. Since Arg-27 is not conserved in rice and wheat ASIs, we further propose that Arg-155 in BASI is the kinetically identified PGO-sensitive group that is essential for inhibition [Abe, Sidenius and Svensson (1993) Biochem. J. 293, 151-155].

Isozyme hybrids within the protruding third loop domain of the barley alpha-amylase (beta/alpha)8-barrel. Implication for BASI sensitivity and substrate affinity

Barley alpha-amylase isozymes AMY1 and AMY2 contain three structural domains: a catalytic (beta/alpha)8-barrel (domain A) with a protruding loop (domain B; residues 89-152) that binds Ca2+, and a small C-terminal domain. Different parts of domain B secure isozyme specific properties as identified for three AMY1-AMY2 hybrids, obtained by homeologous recombination in yeast, with crossing-over at residues 112, 116, and 144. The AMY1 regions Val90-Thr112 and Ala145-Leu161 thus confer high affinities for the substrates alpha-D-maltoheptaoside and amylose, respectively. Leu117-Phe144, and to a lesser degree Ala145-Leu161, are critical for the stability at low pH characteristic of AMY1 and for the sensitivity to barley alpha-amylase/subtilisin inhibitor specific to AMY2.

Mutational analysis of the transcriptional activator VirG of Agrobacterium tumefaciens

To find VirG proteins with altered properties, the virG gene was mutagenized. Random chemical mutagenesis of single-stranded DNA containing the Agrobacterium tumefaciens virG gene led with high frequency to the inactivation of the gene. Sequence analysis showed that 29% of the mutants contained a virG gene with one single-base-pair substitution somewhere in the open reading frame. Thirty-nine different mutations that rendered the VirG protein inactive were mapped. Besides these inactive mutants, two mutants in which the vir genes were active even in the absence of acetosyringone were found on indicator plates. A VirG protein with an N54D substitution turned out to be able to induce a virB-lacZ reporter gene to a high level even in the absence of the inducer acetosyringone. A VirG protein with an I77V substitution exhibited almost no induction in the absence of acetosyringone but showed a maximum induction level already at low concentrations of acetosyringone.

The N-terminal domain of VirG of Agrobacterium tumefaciens: modelling and analysis of mutant phenotypes

Fourteen mutants in the N-terminal domain of virulence factor G (VirG) were obtained by random mutagenesis. Two mutants showed an altered phenotype, all others were non-functional. All mutants can still be phosphorylated and bind to DNA. A 3-D model was built based on the coordinates of chemotaxis protein Y (CheY). Many of the observed phenotypic changes of VirG are explained qualitatively. Combination of model building and biochemical information leads to the conclusion that the active sites of VirG and CheY must partly use different residues to perform the same phosphorylation and dephosphorylation reactions.

Domain B protruding at the third beta strand of the alpha/beta barrel in barley alpha-amylase confers distinct isozyme-specific properties

alpha-Amylases belong to the alpha/beta-barrel protein family in which the active site is created by residues located at the C-terminus of the beta strands and in the helix-connecting loops extending from these ends. In the alpha-amylase family, a small separate domain B protrudes at the C-terminus of the third beta strand of the (beta/alpha)8-barrel framework. The 80% identical barley alpha-amylase isozymes 1 and 2 (AMY1 and AMY2, respectively) differ in substrate affinity and turnover rate, CaCl2 stimulation of activity, sensitivity to the endogenous 21-kDa alpha-amylase/subtilisin inhibitor, and stability at low pH. To identify regions that confer these isozyme-specific variations, AMY1-AMY2 hybrid cDNAs were generated by in vivo homologous recombination in yeast. The hybrids AMY1-(1-90)-AMY2-(90-403) and AMY1-(1-161)-AMY2-(161-403) characterized in this study contain the 90-residue and 161-residue N-terminal sequences, respectively, of AMY1 and complementary C-terminal regions of AMY2. AMY1-(1-90)-AMY2-(90-403) comprises the 60-amino-acid domain B of AMY2 and resembles this isozyme in sensitivity to alpha-amylase/subtilisin inhibitor and its low affinity for the substrates p-nitrophenyl alpha-D-maltoheptaoside, amylose and the inhibitor acarbose. Only AMY1-(1-161)-AMY2-(161-403) and AMY1, which both share domain B, are stable at low pH. However, AMY2 and both hybrid AMY species, but not AMY1, show maximum enzyme activity on insoluble blue starch at approximately 10 mM CaCl2. Domain B thus determines several functional and stability properties that distinguish the barley alpha-amylase isozymes.