The role of phospholipase A2 in multiple Sclerosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Phospholipases A2 (PLA₂) are a diverse group of enzymes that cleave the fatty acids of membrane phospholipids. They play critical roles in pathogenesis of neurodegenerative diseases such as multiple sclerosis by enhancing oxidative stress and initiating inflammation. The levels of PLA₂ activity in MS patients compared to controls and role of inhibiting PLA₂ activity on severity scores in different experimental models are not comprehensively assessed in the light of varying evidence from published studies. The objective of this systematic review is to determine the association between PLA₂ activity and multiple sclerosis (MS) and its animal model, experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE). We performed a systematic review of six studies that assessed PLA₂ activity in MS patients compared to controls and nine studies that assessed PLA₂ activity in EAE. sPLA₂ nor Lp-PLA₂ activity were not increased in MS compared to controls in five of those six studies. A difference in sPLA₂ activity was only found in a study that measured the enzyme activity in urine. However, inhibiting cPLA₂ or sPLA₂ led to lower clinical severity or no signs of EAE in mice, and a lower incidence of EAE lesions compared to animals without cPLA₂ inhibition. These findings indicate that PLA₂ appears to play a role in the pathogenesis of EAE.

Abstract P1-01-01: Circulating tumor cell number and CTC-endocrine therapy index predict clinical outcomes in ER positive metastatic breast cancer patients: Results of the COMETI Phase 2 trial

Introduction: Only half of hormone receptor positive (HR+) metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients (pts) benefit from endocrine therapy (ET). Circulating tumor cells (CTC) are prognostic in pts with MBC using CellSearch® technology. The CTC-endocrine therapy index (CTC-ETI) provides semi-quantitative analyses of CTC-ER (estrogen receptor), BCL2, HER2, and Ki67 expression. We hypothesized that CTC-ETI high (elevated CTC number and/or low expression of ER and BCL2, and high expression of HER2 and Ki-67) might predict resistance to ET in a prospective, multi-institutional clinical trial: COMETI-P2-2012.0 (NCT01701050).

Methods: 121 pts with ER+, HER2 negative (-), and progressive MBC after one or more lines of ET or within 12 months (mos) of completing adjuvant ET, who were initiating a new ET, were enrolled after informed consent. CTC and CTC-ETI were determined as previously reported (Paoletti C et al, CCR 2015) at baseline (BL), 1, 2, 3, and 12 mos, and/or at the time of progression. Imaging was performed every 3 mos. Association of CTC levels and CTC-ETI with patient outcomes (progression free survival (PFS); rapid progression (RP) defined as progression within 3 mos) was assessed using logrank and Fisher's exact tests. Trial design estimated 85 PFS and 51 RP events, providing >90% power (2-sided a=0.05); pts with unsuccessful BL CTC-ETI or ineligible were unevaluable. Only baseline (BL) data are reported in this abstract.

Results: 32% of enrolled pts had progression within 12 mos of completing adjuvant ET, whereas 40%, 20%, and 8% had 1, 2, ≥3 lines of ET for MBC. CTC-ETI was successfully determined in 93% of pts (90% CI, 88% to 97%). CTC were ≥5 CTC/7.5 ml whole blood in 37/108 (34%) pts evaluable for clinical validity. Elevated CTC was associated with worse PFS (median (m) PFS: 3.3 vs. 5.9 mos; P<0.01). Low, intermediate, and high CTC-ETI were observed in 75 (69%), 6 (6%), and 27 (25%) pts, respectively. CTC-ETI was associated with PFS (logrank P<0.01): pts with low, intermediate, and high CTC-ETI had mPFS of 5.7, 8.5, and 2.8 mos, respectively. In the 96 pts eligible for determination, elevated CTC was associated with RP, (65.6% vs. 42.2%; P=0.05) as was CTC-ETI (P=0.003): 79.2% (95% CI, 57.8% to 92.9%) of pts with high CTC-ETI had RP versus 41.2% (95% CI, 29.4% to 53.8%) with low CTC-ETI; in the small group with intermediate CTC-ETI 1 of 4 pts (25%) had RP.

Conclusions: In this multi-institutional, prospective study, CTC-ETI was accurately determined, confirming the previously established analytical validity of the assay, meeting the primary objective of the trial. Elevated CTC and CTC-ETI high compared to low were associated with poor outcomes to ET. CTC-ETI distribution resulted in a small number of patients assigned to the intermediate group, restricting our ability to associate this group with outcomes. These results suggest that CTC-biomarker phenotype and enumeration have clinical validity. CTC-ETI may identify ER+ HER2– MBC pts who are unlikely to benefit from ET and might be better treated with ET in combination with other therapies or proceed to chemotherapy. Further analyses including CTC-ETI at serial time points during ET are planned.

Citation Format: Paoletti C, Regan MM, Liu MC, Marcom PK, Hart LL, Smith II JW, Tedesco KL, Amir E, Krop IE, DeMichele AM, Goodwin PJ, Block M, Aung K, Cannell EM, Darga EP, Baratta PJ, Brown ME, McCormack RT, Hayes DF. Circulating tumor cell number and CTC-endocrine therapy index predict clinical outcomes in ER positive metastatic breast cancer patients: Results of the COMETI Phase 2 trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2016 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2016 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-01-01.

Abstract P2-02-19: Somatic genetic profiling of circulating tumor cells (CTC) in metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients

Introduction: Somatic mutations, including those in TP53, PIK3CA, and estrogen receptor alpha (ESR1), are key to the biology of cancer and response to therapy. Recently, somatic cancer-associated mutations have been identified in circulating cell free plasma tumor DNA (ptDNA). Less is known about the mutation profile of DNA extracted from CTC (CTC-DNA). Since CTC-DNA provides mutational information of single cells, we hypothesize CTC-DNA will complement ptDNA to give greater insight into tumor heterogeneity.

Methods: Patients with ER positive MBC who were enrolled in the Mi CTC-ONCOSEQ, a companion trial to Mi-ONCOSEQ (the Michigan Oncology Sequencing Program), and who had ≥5CTC/7.5 ml whole blood were included. CTC were enriched from white blood cells (WBC) with CellSearch© (CXC kit). CTC and WBC were then purified using DEPArrayTM. DNA from individual CTC and WBC was isolated and subjected to whole genomic amplification (Ampli 1TM WGA). Genetic analysis was performed on individual CTC, pooled CTC and pooled WBC DNA by multiplexed PCR based targeted next generation sequencing (NGS) using the Oncomine Comprehensive Panel (targeting ∼130 onco- and tumor suppressor genes) and the Ion Torrent Proton. All patients had exome sequencing performed on research biopsies of metastases using an Illumina HiSeq 2500 platform.

Results: This pilot study was conducted using high quality DNA from two patients assessed to date. Both patients had lobular carcinoma and as expected harbored somatic, deleterious CDH1 (E-cadherin) mutations (frameshift and non-sense) in both research biopsy and CTC-DNA. These data supported our approach. Patient #1 was TP53 wild type in her research biopsy, but multiple CTC harbored somatic TP53 frame-shift mutations (Table). Patient #2 harbored an ESR1 Y537S mutation in her research biopsy. However, only 4 of 7 CTC also harbored this somatic, heterozygous mutation.

Prioritized mutations in CTCPt#Cell Type (CTC vs WBC), numberGeneMutationVariant fraction (expected 1=homozygous; 0.5=heterozygous)Found in research biopsy?1CTC_A2CDH1p.I584fs1YES CTC_A4  1  CTC_A7  0.54  CTC_pool*  0.74  WBC_pool  0  CTC_A2TP53p.152_156del1NO CTC_A4  1  CTC_A7  0.51  CTC_pool*  0.88  WBC_pool  0 2CTC_A9ESR1p.Y537S0.52YES CTC_D1  0.34  CTC_D2  0.46  CTC_D6  0.65  CTC_pool*  0.35  WBC_pool  0  CTC_A12  0  CTC_D3  0  CTC_D7  0  CTC_A12CDH1p.Q641X1YES CTC_A9  1  CTC_D1  1  CTC_D3  1  CTC_D6  1  CTC_pool*  1  WBC_pool  0 * pool of all CTC

Conclusions: We demonstrate the ability to purify CTC, isolate, and amplify DNA of suitable quality for genetic analysis using a comprehensive targeted sequencing panel. Both known and novel alterations were identified in comparison to research biopsy specimens. This approach allows single cell analysis demonstrating heterogeneity of mutational status in different single cells. Studies of CTC-ESR1 and other genetic abnormalities in patients with known tissue mutations who participated in Mi CTC-ONCOSEQ are now underway.

Citation Format: Paoletti C, Cani AK, Aung K, Darga EP, Cannell EM, Hovelson DH, Yazdani M, Blevins AR, Tokudome N, Larios JM, Thomas DG, Brown ME, Gersch C, Schott AF, Robinson DR, Chinnaiyan AM, Bischoff F, Hayes DF, Rae JM, Tomlins SA. Somatic genetic profiling of circulating tumor cells (CTC) in metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2015 Dec 8-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-02-19.

Abstract P3-05-01: Molecular analysis of cancer tissue, circulating tumor cells (CTC) and cell-free plasma tumor DNA (ptDNA) suggests variable mechanisms of resistance to endocrine therapy (ET) in estrogen receptor (ER) positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC)

Introduction: Fifty percent of ER positive MBC patients do not benefit from ET. Potential mechanisms of resistance to ET in this patient population include absence of ER expression by deletion or suppression, alteration in ER signaling pathway genes, or upregulation of multiple growth factor receptor pathways. We hypothesized that genotyping and phenotyping of CTC combined with genomic analysis of ptDNA will provide important insights into the multiple mechanisms of ET resistance and that a set of blood tests might serve as a "liquid biopsy" abrogating the need for tissue specimens.

Methods: Twenty-four patients providing informed consent were enrolled into the Mi CTC-ONCOSEQ study, a companion trial to Mi-ONCOSEQ (the Michigan Oncology Sequencing Program). Seven of these patients (5 with ER immunohistochemistry (IHC) positive and 2 with ER negative cancers) who had available archived primary and metastatic cancer tissue, a research metastatic biopsy for genomic analysis, and who had ≥5CTC/7.5 ml whole blood (WB) characterized for ER protein (CTC-ER) are the focus of this report. All the patients were ET refractory. None of them was progressing on fulvestrant at the time of study entry. CTC enumeration and phenotyping was performed with CellSearch©. Circulating ptDNA was analyzed by droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR). ER status from archived tissue was obtained from chart review. ER mRNA expression was determined in the research biopsy of metastatic tissue by using quantitative RNA sequencing. Mutational status of ER gene, ESR1, was determined by Next-gen Sequencing using the Illumina HiSeq 2500 platform.

Results: The 2 control patients with triple negative breast cancer had negative CTC-ER. Discordance between CTC-ER and tissue ER by IHC was observed (Table). Two of the 5 ER positive patients retained CTC-ER positivity (39% and 19% of the CTC). One of them (#7) harbored an ESR1 mutation in the research biopsy tissue and in ptDNA, whereas the other (#14) had wild type (WT) ESR1. CTC-ER protein levels in patients #12, 17 and 24 were negative. All had WT ESR1 in the research biopsy tissue. Of note, patient #12 had WT ESR1 in the research biopsy, but an ESR1 mutation was detected in her ptDNA.

Pt#CTC-ER Tissue-ER  ESR1 status in research biopsyESR1 status in ptDNA N[deg]CTC/7.5ml WB% CTC-ER +Primary by IHCMet by IHCMet research biopsy by mRNA  71839%+++Y537SY537S141619%+NA+WTWT12130%+++WTD538G17160%++weakly+WTWT242750%+weakly+weakly+WTWT

Conclusions: These exploratory data suggest heterogeneous mechanisms of resistance to ET in patients with previously determined ER-positive MBC, including ESR1 mutations in ER positive cases (seen in 2 patients) and loss of ER expression (seen in CTC of 3 patients). In contrast, other cancers continue to express WT ESR1, and therefore must have developed alternative mechanisms of resistance. At least 2 of these mechanisms can be detected and monitored with complementary circulating assays: CTC and ptDNA. Further investigations are needed to understand the heterogeneous mechanisms of resistance to ET.

Citation Format: Paoletti C, Aung K, Cannell EM, Darga EP, Chu D, Kidwell KM, Thomas DG, Tokudome N, Brown ME, McNutt LM, Gersch C, Schott AF, Park BH, Robinson DR, Chinnaiyan AM, Rae JM, Hayes DF. Molecular analysis of cancer tissue, circulating tumor cells (CTC) and cell-free plasma tumor DNA (ptDNA) suggests variable mechanisms of resistance to endocrine therapy (ET) in estrogen receptor (ER) positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC). [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2015 Dec 8-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-05-01.

Predicting the development of the metabolically healthy obese phenotype

Objective

The metabolically healthy (MHO) and unhealthy obese (MUHO) differ in terms of cardiovascular risk. However, little is known about predicting the development of these phenotypes and the future stability of the MHO phenotype. Therefore, we examined these two issues in the San Antonio Heart Study.

Design

Longitudinal, population-based study of cardiometabolic risk factors among Mexican Americans and non-Hispanic whites in San Antonio.

Subjects

The study sample included 2,368 participants with neither MUHO nor diabetes at baseline. Median follow-up was 7.8 years. MHO was defined as obesity with ≤1 metabolic abnormality; MUHO, as obesity with ≥2 abnormalities.

Results

At baseline, 1,595 and 498 individuals were non-obese with ≤1 and ≥2 metabolic abnormalities, respectively; 275 were MHO. Among non-obese individuals, independent predictors of incident MHO (OR for 1-SD change [95% CI]) included body mass index (8.12 [5.66 – 11.7]), triglycerides (0.52 [0.39 – 0.68]), and HDL-C (1.41 [1.11 – 1.81]), whereas independent predictors of incident MUHO included BMI (5.97 [4.58 – 7.77]) and triglycerides (1.26 [1.05 – 1.51]). Among participants with ≤1 metabolic abnormality, obesity was associated with greater odds of developing multiple metabolic abnormalities (OR 2.26 [1.74 – 2.95]).

Conclusions

Triglycerides and HDL-C may be useful for predicting progression to MHO. MHO may not be a stable condition, because it confers an increased risk of developing multiple metabolic abnormalities.

Abstract P1-04-01: Significance of circulating tumor cells in metastatic triple negative breast cancer: Results of an open label, randomized, phase II trial of nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel with or without the anti-death receptor 5 tigatuzumab (TBCRC 019)

Background: Circulating Tumor cells (CTCs) are prognostic at baseline and first follow-up in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Using the most commonly used assay (CellSearch®), we have previously reported the ability to detect apoptotic vs. non-apoptotic CTCs in patients with MBC. However, there has been concern regarding the performance of the CellSearch® assay in patients with triple negative (TN) MBC. We hypothesized that CellSearch® is an effective assay in patients with TN MBC, and that CTC-apoptosis might further separate prognosis. Therefore, we studied CTCs in patients with TN MBC who participated in a prospective randomized phase II trial testing for activity of tigatuzumab (TIG) in combination with nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel (nab-PAC) conducted by the Translational Breast Cancer Research Consortium (overall results reported by Forero A., et al, ASCO 2013).

Methods: Whole blood (WB) was drawn into a CellSave tube at baseline, day 15, and day 29 and CTC counts were determined using the CXC CellSearch® kit. Apoptosis was characterized by staining with a monoclonal antibody that detects a neo-epitope on fragmented cytokeratin (M-30) and independently by visual inspection (nucleic condensation and/or fragmentation, as well as granular cytokeratin). Association between levels of CTCs and CTC-apoptosis with the overall response rate (ORR) and progression free survival (PFS) at baseline, day 15, and day 29 was assessed using logistic regression, Kaplan Meier curves, and Cox proportional hazards modeling.

Results: Of the 60 patients entered into the trial, 52 were evaluable for CTCs. Of these, 19/52 (36.5%), 14/52 (26.9%), and 13/49 (26.5%) had elevated CTCs (≥5CTC/7.5 ml WB) at baseline, day 15, and day 29, respectively. Patients with elevated CTCs at each time point had worse PFS than patients with low or no CTCs. Hazard rates (HR) at baseline, day 15, and day 29 were 2.38 (95% CI: 1.27-4.45, p = 0.007), 2.87 (95% CI: 1.46-5.66, p = 0.002), and 3.40 (95% CI: 1.68-6.89, p = 0.001), respectively. The odds of overall response for those who had elevated CTCs compared to those who did not at baseline, day 15, and day 29, were 0.25 (95% CI: 0.073-0.81, p = 0.024), 0.18 (95% CI: 0.04-0.67, p = 0.014), and 0.06 (95% CI: 0.01-0.28, p = 0.001), respectively. There was no apparent prognostic effect comparing the degree of CTC-apoptosis vs. non-apoptosis.

Conclusions: Similar to observations in other intrinsic subgroups, CTCs were detected in a large fraction of TN MBC patients at baseline using CellSearch® assay, and reductions in CTC levels reflected response. In these homogenously prospectively enrolled TN MBC patients, regardless of treatment, CTCs are prognostic at baseline, day 15, and day 29. It does not appear that analysis of CTC-apoptosis is prognostic.

Supported by Susan G. Komen for the Cure, Veridex, LLC, Fashion Footwear Charitable Foundation of New York/QVC Presents Shoes on Sale™ (DFH), Associazione Sandro Pitigliani and by a studentship from FIRC (CP), Triple Negative Breast Cancer Foundation, The AVON Foundation, and The Breast Cancer Research Foundation.

Citation Information: Cancer Res 2013;73(24 Suppl): Abstract nr P1-04-01.

Abstract PD6-4: Heterogeneity of expression of estrogen receptor by circulating tumor cells suggests diverse mechanisms of resistance to fulvestrant in metastatic breast cancer patients

Introduction: Fulvestrant is a selective estrogen receptor down-regulator (SERD). Recent studies have shown that the efficacy of fulvestrant is dose-related. However, at the higher dose (500 mg/month) most cancers develop resistance and progress. We previously reported expression of several markers, including estrogen receptor (ER) and BCL-2, on breast cancer circulating tumor cells (CTC) using CellSearch®. We now report pilot data showing inter-patient heterogeneity of these markers on CTC in patients with known ER positive breast cancer whose disease is progressing on fulvestrant.

Methods: We conducted a pilot trial to determine the analytical validity of measuring expression of markers of endocrine sensitivity (ER, BCL-2) or resistance (HER-2, Ki-67) with fluorescent-labeled antibodies using the CellSearch® system. Patients with ER positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC) whose disease was progressing on any type of therapy were eligible after signed informed consent. This report is limited to the subjects who were progressing on fulvestrant. Whole blood (WB) was characterized for CTC counts and each of the four molecular markers using the CXC CellSearch® kit.

Results: Of 50 enrolled patients, seven were progressing on fulvestrant. Two patients had no detectable CTC, while five patients had an average of ≥5 CTC/7.5 mL WB. Results are shown in a table below:

   CTC-ERCTC-BCL-2Patient #Fulvestrant dose (mg/month)Days since last doseN CTC/7.5 mL of WB% of CTC-ER+N CTC/7.5 mL of WB% of CTC-BCL-2+295002880%110%4550028170%170%2250341010%714%850031812%1735%172507728%367%

These exploratory data suggest widely different mechanisms of resistance to fulvestrant in different patients with ER positive MBC. In two of the patients (29, 45) treated with 500 mg/month, both CTC-ER and CTC-BCL-2 expression were absent, suggesting no signaling through the ER pathway. We hypothesize either that fulvestrant was actively down-regulating ER, but the cancers had adopted other growth and survival pathways, or that ER negative, hormone-independent clones had evolved. In the other three cases, ER was clearly present with evidence of signaling, based on BCL-2 expression. Two of these patients (2, 17) were on the lower dose of fulvestrant, now considered to be less effective. However, the third (8) was on the higher dose and yet still had evidence of ER signaling. This observation suggests that some patients may benefit from even higher doses of SERD therapy.

Conclusions: These pilot results suggest heterogeneous biological or pharmacological mechanisms of resistance to SERD therapy. These data suggest that CTC-ER and CTC-BCL-2 expression could serve as pharmacodynamic monitoring tools for dose escalation of fulvestrant or other SERDs. Further molecular analysis might provide biological bases for resistance to fulvestrant.

Supported by Veridex, LLC, Fashion Footwear Charitable Foundation of New York/QVC Presents Shoes on Sale™ (DFH), Associazione Sandro Pitigliani and by a studentship from FIRC (CP).

Citation Information: Cancer Res 2013;73(24 Suppl): Abstract nr PD6-4.

Thiazide diuretics and the risk of hip fracture

BACKGROUND

Thiazide diuretics are one of the most commonly prescribed antihypertensive agents worldwide. Thiazides reduce urinary calcium excretion. Chronic ingestion of thiazides is associated with higher bone mineral density. It has been suggested that thiazides may prevent hip fracture. However, there are concerns that diuretics, by increasing the risk of fall in elderly, could potentially negate its beneficial effects on hip fracture.

OBJECTIVES

To assess any association between the use of thiazide diuretics and the risk of hip fracture in adults.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched eligible studies up to December 2008 in MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), International Pharmaceutical Abstracts, the Database of Abstracts of Review of Effects (DARE) and reference lists of previous reviews and included studies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All randomized controlled trials and observational studies, which assessed the association between thiazide diuretic use and hip fracture.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently applied the selection criteria, extracted data and assessed risk of bias of each study selected.  The results were summarized descriptively and quantitatively. Cohort studies and case control studies were analysed separately.

MAIN RESULTS

No randomized control trials were found. Twenty-one observational studies with nearly four hundred thousand participants were included. Six of them were cohort studies and 15 were case-control studies. Two cohort studies appear to involve the same cohort so there were only 5 unique ones. The risk of bias was assessed with the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). Five cohort studies had low risk of bias and one had moderate risk of bias. Seven case control studies had low risk of bias and 8 had moderate risk of bias. Meta-analysis of cohort studies showed that thiazide use was associated with a reduction in risk of hip fracture by 24%, pooled RR 0.76 (95% CI 0.64-0.89; p = 0.0009). We chose not to provide a pooled summary statistics for case-control studies because of high heterogeneity (Tau(2) = 0.03, I(2) = 62%, p = 0.0008).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Thiazides appear to reduce the risk of hip fracture based on observational studies. Randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm these findings.  

Pulse pressure, prehypertension, and mortality: the San Antonio heart study

BACKGROUND

Prehypertension increases mortality risk. Pulse pressure is also associated with increased mortality. Nevertheless, the impact of pulse pressure on the relationship between prehypertension and mortality is not known in individuals who are free of diabetes and cardiovascular disease.

METHODS

Cox regression analysis was used to examine mortality risk among 3,632 (97.0%) participants in the San Antonio Heart Study (age range, 25-64 years; mean follow-up, 15.2 years). Results were adjusted for age, sex, ethnicity, education, body mass index (BMI), smoking, and total cholesterol concentration. The Seventh Report of the Joint Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure (JNC 7) categories were used for blood pressure staging: normal, <120/80 mm Hg; prehypertension, 120-139/80-89 mm Hg.

RESULTS

Prehypertension prevalence was 31.6% at baseline. There were 218 deaths during the follow-up period. Prehypertension-predicted mortality (all-cause, hazard ratio (HR) 1.49 (1.12-1.99); cardiovascular, HR 1.79 (1.07-3.02)). Relative to normal blood pressure plus pulse pressure in the lower tertile, prehypertension plus pulse pressure in the upper tertile was associated with increased mortality (all-cause, HR 2.14 (1.38-3.32); cardiovascular, HR 2.47 (1.13-5.39)); however, prehypertension plus pulse pressure in the lower tertile was not significantly associated with mortality (all-cause, HR 1.19 (0.52-2.67); cardiovascular, HR 0.43 (0.05-3.40)).

CONCLUSIONS

Prehypertension increases mortality risk (all-cause and cardiovascular) in individuals who are free of diabetes and cardiovascular disease. Nevertheless, this relationship is not evident in individuals with narrow pulse pressure. Therefore, pulse pressure may be a relevant measure of blood pressure for the definition of normal blood pressure.

Vasopressin for Cardiac Arrest

BACKGROUND

The current guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation recommend vasopressin as an alternative to epinephrine for the treatment of adult shock-refractory ventricular fibrillation. The objective of this study was to determine the effectiveness of vasopressin in the treatment of cardiac arrest.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of 1519 patients with cardiac arrest from 5 randomized controlled trials that compared vasopressin and epinephrine. Two reviewers conducted a systematic search of electronic databases, complemented by hand searches, to identify randomized trials. Reviewers evaluated the quality of the trials, extracted data, and derived pooled estimates using a random-effects model.

RESULTS

There were no statistically significant differences between the vasopressin and epinephrine groups in failure of return of spontaneous circulation (risk ratio [RR], 0.81; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.58-1.12), death before hospital admission (RR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.38-1.39), death within 24 hours (RR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.38-1.43), death before hospital discharge (RR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.87-1.05), or combination of number of deaths and neurologically impaired survivors (RR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.94-1.07). Subgroup analysis based on initial cardiac rhythm showed no statistically significant difference in the rate of death before hospital discharge between the vasopressin and epinephrine groups in any of the 3 subgroups: ventricular fibrillation or ventricular tachycardia (RR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.79-1.19), pulseless electrical activity (RR, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.95-1.10), or asystole (RR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.94-1.00).

CONCLUSIONS

There is no clear advantage of vasopressin over epinephrine in the treatment of cardiac arrest. Guidelines for Advanced Cardiac Life Support should not recommend vasopressin in resuscitation protocols until more solid human data on its superiority are available.