Pre-appointment online assessment of patient complexity: Towards a personalized model of neuropsychological assessment

Recent events such as the global pandemic of COVID-19 have challenged neuropsychologists to scale up their capacity to conduct portions of their assessment remotely. While more complex patients will likely continue to require on-site, office-based interaction and assessment, the current emergency-based expansion of online and telehealth evaluation practices may ultimately lay the groundwork for more routine, online assessment of patients with less complex presentations in the future. To this end, the current study evaluated a pre-appointment, online methodology for differentiating referred pediatric patients based upon the scope and severity of their caregiver-reported adaptive, academic, attentional, behavioral, and emotional impairment. Prior to on-site assessment, parents/caregivers of 2197 children (Mean age = 10.0y, range = 4-19y, 62% male) completed an online developmental history form screening for symptoms of adaptive, attentional, learning, affective, and behavioral impairment; 71% of those children eventually underwent assessment. Using latent class analysis, the data supported a reproducible 4-class model consisting of groups of children at increased risk for: 1) severe multi-domain dysfunction; the "High Complexity" group, 30%, 2) behavioral-affective (but not academic) dysregulation; the "Behavioral Focus" group, 13%, 3) academic (but not behavioral-affective) problems; the "Academic and Inattention" group, 37%, and 4) patients with minimal clinical complexity; the "Low Complexity" group, 20%. Comparison of pre-visit classification with day-of-assessment standardized test scores supported the validity of patient subtypes. Moving forward, pre-appointment clarification of patient complexity may support efficient patient triage with regard to assessment modality (e.g., on-site or online) and length of appointment (e.g., comprehensive or targeted).

Interest in Research Participation Among Caregivers of Children with Neurodevelopmental Disorders

The goal of this study was to examine caregiver agreement to hear about local research opportunities by joining a clinical research registry. Data from this cross-sectional study were gathered, between 2014 and 2017, across two outpatient clinics: (1) a multidisciplinary Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) clinic (N = 5228) and (2) a general psychology clinic serving youth with, or at risk for, a neurodevelopmental disorder (NDD; N = 5040). Overall, more than 8 in 10 caregivers agreed to join the registry. Several child clinical characteristics, as well as racial and sociodemographic factors, were predictive of parental agreement. Findings suggest caregivers of youth with ASD and NDD are amenable to joining the local research enterprise, however further work is needed to understand why some caregivers decline.

Correction to: Interest in Research Participation Among Caregivers of Children with Neurodevelopmental Disorders

During the publication process, an author "M. Pinkett-Davis", who helped conceptualize and revise this study was accidentally excluded from the authorship list. The revised author group is now: Kalb, L., Jacobson, L., Zisman, C., Mahone, E., Landa, R., Azad, G., Pinkett-Davis, M., Menon, D., Singh, V., Zabel, A., & Pritchard, A. Please use this authorship list when citing this manuscript.

Methodological considerations when assessing restricted and repetitive behaviors and aggression

Methodological issues impacting the relationship between aggression and restricted, repetitive, and stereotyped behaviors and interests (RRSBI) were examined in 2648 children and adolescents with autism spectrum disorders (ASD) using a multi-method, multi-informant analysis model to assess the effects of informant, assessment method, and aggression phenotype. Overall, a significant, but small relationship was found between RRSBI and aggression (p < .05). There was significant heterogeneity of estimates with large effect sizes observed when utilizing teacher report and a broad phenotype of aggression. Variance in estimates was attributed to differences in informant and assessment method with two times greater effect attributed to informant. Results suggest strategies to optimize future investigations of the relationship between RRSBI and aggression. Findings also provide the opportunity for the development of targeted interventions for aggression in youth with ASD.

Physical fighting in childhood as a risk factor for later mental health problems

OBJECTIVE

The prevalence, persistence, and desistance of boys' physical fighting was examined over a 7-year period. The importance of persistent physical fighting compared with other risk factors in the prediction of later mental health problems was explored.

METHOD

One hundred seventy-seven boys, aged 7 to 12 years, who had been referred to clinics for mental health problems were followed up annually for 7 years, with the boys, their parents, and teachers as informants.

RESULTS

Agreement among different informants about the boys' fighting tended to be low. The prevalence of fighting over time remained quite similar for different age cohorts. Almost 9 of 10 fighters in year 1 continued to fight in one or more successive years, and about one third of the boys could be classified as persistent fighters. Only 13.1% of the boys desisted in fighting. Boys who desisted, compared with those who persisted, had higher intelligence and their mothers scored lower on measures of antisocial personality disorder. At year 7, persistent fighting was significantly associated with impairment. The prevalence of psychiatric diagnoses in year 7 was 3 times higher for persistent fighters than for nonfighters. Using regression analyses with several control variables, conduct disorder was best predicted by earlier oppositional defiant disorder in year 1 and persistent fighting. Global impairment was best predicted by oppositional defiant disorder in year 1, persistent fighting, and low IQ. Finally, the number of diagnoses at year 7 was best predicted by persistent fighting.

CONCLUSION

Physical fighting constitutes a significant mental health risk in referred boys.