The importance of postoperative radiation therapy in multimodality management of locally advanced breast cancer: a phase II trial of neoadjuvant MVAC, surgery, and radiation

PURPOSE

To determine the impact of postoperative radiation on locoregional relapse and overall survival rate in a multimodality protocol for locally advanced breast cancer (LABC).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Of the patients entered in the protocol, 55 were evaluable. Treatment consisted of: neoadjuvant MVAC (methotrexate, vinblastine, adriamycin, and cisplatin) until a maximum response had been achieved; modified radical mastectomy; 6 courses of postoperative adjuvant MVAC chemotherapy, and chest wall irradiation (CWXRT). Multivariate analysis of locoregional response and overall survival was done.

RESULTS

Of the total, 42 patients received chest wall radiation; 28 of these also received radiation to regional lymph nodes. Chest wall doses ranged from 45 Gy to 50.4 Gy to the whole chest wall, with 31 patients receiving an additional chest-wall boost. The incidence of locoregional relapse with and without radiation was 7% vs. 31%, respectively (p = 0.026). An overall survival benefit was seen in those receiving radiation, with a mean overall survival of 50 months vs. 20 months, and a 3-year overall survival of 88% vs. 46% with and without radiation, respectively (p = 0.003). Multivariate analysis showed that overall survival was affected by the presence of pathological CR (p = .047), the number of pre-operative chemotherapy cycles (p = .036) and whether or not they received radiation (p = 0.003). Neither the interval between surgery and radiation, technique of radiation, nor radiation modality significantly affected local control.

CONCLUSION

The significant improvement in local regional control and overall survival with the addition of radiation suggests that radiation should be an integral part of multimodality management of locally advanced breast cancer.

A phase I study of chemoembolization with cisplatin and lipiodol for primary and metastatic liver cancer

Twenty patients with either unresectable primary hepatocellular carcinoma or hepatic metastases were entered into a chemoembolization program with cisplatin and lipiodol; 19 patients were evaluable for response. Doses of cisplatin ranged from 40 to 100 mg/m2. Toxicity was tolerable and reversible and included abdominal pain, transient elevation in serum creatinine, serum bilirubin, and serum transaminases. Less common side effects include fever, ascites or pleural effusion, and hiccups. Two of four patients with ocular melanoma had partial responses. Duration of response was 10 and 11 months. Among 8 patients with unresectable hepatoma, 2 patients had partial response for 10+ and 13 months, 2 had minor response for 2 months and 4+ months, 1 patient had stable disease for 5+ months, and 3 patients failed to respond. Of the six colon cancer patients treated, one had a partial response in the liver, but developed progressive nodal disease, and another patient had a partial response for 3 months. Chemoembolization of the liver with cisplatin and lipiodol is feasible and doses of cisplatin at least 100 mg/m2 are tolerable. Antitumor activity in metastatic ocular melanoma is encouraging but requires further study.

Phase I study of high dose 5-fluorouracil and high dose Leucovorin with low dose phosphonacetyl-L-aspartic acid in patients with advanced malignancies

Twenty-eight patients with refractory advanced malignancies were treated with a 24 hr infusion of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), Leucovorin (LV), and N-(phosphonacetyl)-L-aspartic acid (PALA) weekly. Twenty-seven patients were evaluable for the assessment of toxicity and anti-tumor activity. PALA was administered as intravenous bolus over 15 min at a fixed dose, 250 mg/m2 24 hr before the start of 5-FU and LV infusions. 5-FU was initially administered at 750 mg/m2 and was incrementally increased to 2600 mg/m2. LV was administered in a fixed dose of 500 mg/m2 concurrently with 5-FU over a 24-hr period. The course was repeated weekly. Diarrhea, stomatitis, nausea, and vomiting were among dose-limiting toxic effects. Other toxicities observed were hand-foot syndrome, hair loss of scalp/eyelashes, overall weakness, rhinitis, and chemical conjunctivitis. Maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of 5-FU in this combination and schedule was 2600 mg/m2. Seven of 14 patients treated at 2600 mg/m2 were able to tolerate the chemotherapy on a weekly basis without interruption. The other seven patients required dose de-escalation, a majority of whom contained 5-FU at a dose of 2100 mg/m2. Twenty-three of 27 patients had been previously treated. Eight patients achieved a partial response, all of whom were previously treated, except three patients. A complete response was observed in a patient with pancreatic carcinoma, previously untreated. Overall response rate for the patients who were treated at the 5-FU dose of 2100 mg/m2 or 2600 mg/m2 is 9 of 18 patients (50%).

A phase I, II study of high-dose 5-fluorouracil and high-dose leucovorin with low-dose phosphonacetyl-L-aspartic acid in patients with advanced malignancies

Twenty-eight patients with refractory advanced malignancies were treated with a 24-hour infusion of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), leucovorin (LV), and N-(phosphonacetyl)-L-aspartic acid (PALA) weekly. Twenty-seven patients were evaluable to assess toxicity and antitumor activity. The PALA was administered as an intravenous bolus over 15 minutes at a fixed dose (250 mg/m2) 24 hours before the start of the 5-FU and leucovorin infusions. Initially the dose of 5-FU was 750 mg/m2; this was increased incrementally to 2600 mg/m2. The LV was administered in a fixed dose of 500 mg/m2 concurrently with the 5-FU over a 24-hour period. This regimen was repeated weekly. Diarrhea, stomatitis, nausea, and vomiting were among the dose-limiting toxicities. Others were hand-foot syndrome, hair loss of the scalp and eyelashes, overall weakness, rhinitis, and chemical conjunctivitis. The maximum tolerated dose of 5-FU in this combination and schedule was 2600 mg/m2. Seven of 14 patients treated with 2600 mg/m2 were able to tolerate the chemotherapy on a weekly basis without interruption. The other seven patients required dose reductions, but most received 5-FU at a dose of 2100 mg/m2. Twenty-three of 27 patients were treated previously. Eight patients had a partial response; five of these were treated previously. A complete response was observed in one patient with pancreatic carcinoma, previously untreated. The overall response rate for patients treated with 2100 or 2600 mg/m2 of 5-FU was nine of 18 patients (50%). Three of four previously untreated patients with pancreatic cancer responded to this treatment (two responded partially, and one had a complete response). One of three heavily pretreated patients with non-small cell lung cancer had a partial response as did a patient with breast cancer. Four of ten patients with colorectal cancer responded to the treatment (four partial responses), of whom three had been treated previously.

A phase II study of weekly 24-hour infusion with high-dose fluorouracil with leucovorin in colorectal carcinoma

Twenty-two patients with advanced colorectal carcinoma were enrolled in this study. Ten patients had received prior chemotherapy that included the combination of fluorouracil (5-FU) and leucovorin (LV). All patients required subcutaneous port insertion and portable external infusion pumps to allow outpatient treatment. 5-FU (2,600 mg/m2) was administered concurrently with LV (500 mg/m2) over 24 hours of continuous infusion. The mean steady-state plasma concentration of 5-FU was 10 mumol/L (range, 7 to 14 mumol/L). The 5-FU dose was based on our previous phase I study, in which maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) of 5-FU was determined to be 2,600 mg/m2 in combination with a fixed dose of LV at 500 mg/m2. The treatment was repeated weekly. Twenty-two patients received a total of 560 courses of treatment. Eleven instances of grade 2-3 toxicity were observed: diarrhea (five), stomatitis (three), hand/foot syndrome (three). The overall objective response was 45% (10 of 22) and among previously untreated patients was 58%. Three of the responders achieved complete response (CR), with lung and liver as the metastatic sites. The median duration of survival for the previously untreated patients was not reached at 22 months, and was 10 months for the previously treated patients. These results suggest that short-term infusional therapy of 5-FU and LV in patients with advanced metastatic colorectal cancer generates acceptable toxicity, with equivalent or superior survivability in previously treated and untreated patients versus alternative methods of administration of the two agents.

A two-step timed sequential treatment for acute myelocytic leukemia

Since 1980, adults with acute myelocytic leukemia (AML) have been treated on two clinical studies using intensive timed sequential therapy. All patients ages 16 to 80, including those with secondary AML (SAML) and those with AML preceded by a hematologic disorder (AHD), were treated, regardless of medical complications at the time of diagnosis. The first study combined high doses of cytarabine (ara-C, AC) and daunorubicin (DRN, D) in sequence (Ac2-D-Ac) and resulted in a complete remission rate of 55%. A group of these patients selected by functional status was able to receive a second course of therapy in remission, which resulted in a disease-free survival (DFS) of greater than 40% at 7 years. Because of toxicity in that study, 114 patients were entered on a second trial initiated 4 years ago, using a less aggressive first course, with amsacrine, to achieve a stable remission (Ac2-D-Amsa). This first treatment was followed by a more intensive second course (Ac6-D-Ac). With this two-step approach, a higher complete remission (CR) rate (76% for de novo AML and 54% for SAML-AHD) was achieved, and more patients were able to receive the second course of therapy. At the current median follow-up of 26 months, the median duration of DFS and overall survival are 11 and 14 months for patients with de novo AML. Age less than or equal to 55 is the most significant prognostic factor for both prolonged DFS and overall survival, with median durations of 17 and 18 months, respectively, for these younger patients. Patients with SAML-AHD remain relatively refractory to treatment despite aggressive chemotherapy, with median durations of DFS and overall survival of 9 months and 5 months, respectively.