A comparative study of HLA-DRB typing by transcription-mediated amplification with the hybridization protection assay (TMA/HPA) versus PCR/SSOP

To evaluate alternative human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-DNA typing methods, we used a system of transcription-mediated amplification (TMA) with a probe hybridization protection assay (HPA) in a microtiter plate format developed by Chugai Pharmaceutics Ltd. (Tokyo, Japan) to perform intermediate-level DRB typing for 502 individual samples. Two hundred fifty-two samples submitted to our Clinical Immunogenetics Laboratory were prospectively tested concurrently with a locally developed intermediate-level DRB polymerase chain reaction/sequence-specific oligonucleotide probe (PCR/SSOP) assay in a double-blind fashion. In addition, 250 retrospective samples of archived frozen cells or DNA from clinical and research panels, previously typed by allele-level DRB1 PCR/SSOP, were chosen to include 66 distinct DRB1 alleles representing Caucasian, American Black, Asian, and Native American ethnic groups. Among the prospectively typed samples, except for four samples with a TMA/HPA microplate handling problem, a single TMA/HPA allele assignment (1/462 alleles = 0.2%) was discordant with PCR/SSOP. Among the 250 retrospective samples, a single HPA probe for codon 57 aspartic acid consistently cross-reacted with the codon 57 valine sequence of DRB1*0807. However, TMA/HPA identified six samples with previous PCR/SSOP typing errors, all of which involved identification of sequences at codons 67-71 in samples heterozygous for two DR52-associated DRB1 alleles. Assay turnaround time from sample preparation to results was 11 h for 24 samples or 6-7 h for 1-4 samples. In summary, we found the TMA/HPA DRB typing system to provide rapid, reliable, and accurate HLA-DRB typing results. The current TMA/HPA methodology could be improved by use of a molded plastic cold block to provide more consistent and secure microtiter plate cooling than the current water/ice slurry. Nevertheless, this methodology, based on a microtiter plate format but without the usual plate washing steps of the traditional ELISA, has superior potential for microplate handling and reagent distribution with a robotics system and a work surface incorporating microplate heating and cooling units.

Six new DR52-associated DRB1 alleles, three of DR8, two of DR11, and one of DR6, reflect a variety of mechanisms which generate polymorphism in the MHC

We have sequenced DNA from six new DR52-associated DRB1 alleles initially detected by PCR/SSOP analysis. Three DR8 associated alleles differed from previously known alleles by single nucleotide substitutions. DRB1*0807 and DRB1*0811 both vary from DRB1*08021 at codon 57 resulting in two different amino acids at this residue. DRB1*0807 was identified in samples of Brazilian origin while *0811 was identified among samples from the Tlingit Native American population of Southeast Alaska. DRB1*0814, identified in a family of Chinese origin, differed from DRB1*08032 at codon 12 at both the nucleotide and the amino acid level. In addition, two alleles of DR11, DRB1*1113 and *1119, were each detected in Caucasian individuals. DRB1*1113 differs from other DR11 alleles at codons 37, 67, 70 and 74, while DRB1*1119 differs from *1101 by a single nucleotide substitution at codon 67. Finally, DRB1*1418 was detected in a sample from an Asian or Pacific Islander and shares sequences with several other DR52-associated DRB1 alleles. These six DRB1 alleles appear to have been generated by either gene conversion events, DRB1*1113 and *1418, or by point mutations, DRB1*0814, *0807, *0811 and *1119, although the single nucleotide substitutions found in the latter three alleles are also present in at least one other DRB1 allele and, therefore, could have been the product of gene conversions.