Self-report and urine drug screen concordance among women with co-occurring PTSD and substance use disorders participating in a clinical trial: Impact of drug type and participant characteristics

BACKGROUND

Self-report measures are important in substance use assessment, yet they are susceptible to reporting errors. Urine drug screens (UDS) are often considered a more valid alternative. However, collecting in-person UDS may not always be feasible, contributing to the need to understand factors that influence the validity of self-reported substance use.

METHODS

In this secondary analysis of data from 295 women with co-occurring PTSD and substance use disorders (SUD) who participated in a clinical trial testing behavioral interventions, we examined concordance and discordance between self-reported drug use and associated UDS results. Generalized linear mixed models were used to examine the impact of treatment type and participant characteristics on the associations between self-reported drug use and UDS results.

RESULTS

Findings revealed higher disagreement between self-report and UDS for opioids and sedatives (ranging from.77 to.90) and lower disagreement rates for cannabis and cocaine (ranging from.26 to.33). Treatment type was not a significant moderator of the associations between self-report and UDS across all drugs. Among those with a positive opioid UDS, those who reported employment in the past three years were more likely to self-report no opioid use compared to their counterparts without employment in the past three years.

CONCLUSIONS

Findings add to the literature that supports the validity of self-reported cannabis and cocaine use. The greater discrepancies between self-report and UDS test results of opioids and sedatives suggest adjunctive UDS may be required, although a variety of factors other than inaccurate self-report may be associated with this discrepancy.

Exploring the Role of Traumatic Event Exposure in Tobacco Dependence Treatment Outcomes Among African Americans

African Americans are more likely to die from tobacco-related diseases and less likely to quit smoking than their white counterparts. Evidence of greater prevalence of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) among African Americans underscores the importance of studying the effects of traumatic event exposure on tobacco dependence treatment outcomes in this group. In this secondary analysis of data from a previously completed randomized control trial, we examined the effects of traumatic event exposure (e.g., serious accident) on tobacco dependence treatment outcomes, as well its moderating effects on the effectiveness of an adapted smoking cessation treatment, in a sample (n = 169) of African American smokers in New York City. Traumatic event exposure did not have a significant impact on tobacco treatment outcomes and did not moderate the relationship between treatment type and outcomes in this sample. While results may be driven by unique sample characteristics, they may also indicate that an average level of traumatic event exposure does not significantly impact tobacco treatment outcomes among African Americans. Future research should examine the effects of higher levels of traumatic event exposure on treatment outcomes, as well as investigating the factors underlying trauma-exposed individuals' difficulties with reducing/quitting smoking in a larger, more diverse African American sample.