Early Cold Stored Platelet Transfusion Following Severe Injury: A Randomized Clinical Trial

OBJECTIVE

To determine the feasibility, efficacy, and safety of early cold stored platelet transfusion compared to standard care resuscitation in patients with hemorrhagic shock.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

Data demonstrating the safety and efficacy of early cold stored platelet transfusion are lacking following severe injury.

METHODS

A phase 2, multicenter, randomized, open label, clinical trial was performed at five U.S. trauma centers. Injured patients at risk of large volume blood transfusion and the need for hemorrhage control procedures were enrolled and randomized. The intervention was the early transfusion of a single apheresis cold stored platelet unit, stored for up to 14 days vs. standard care resuscitation. The primary outcome was feasibility and the principal clinical outcome for efficacy and safety was 24-hour mortality.

RESULTS

Mortality at 24 hours was 5.9% in patients who were randomized to early cold stored platelet transfusion compared to 10.2% in the standard care arm (difference, -4.3%; 95% CI, -12.8% to 3.5%; P=0.26). No significant differences were found for any of the prespecified ancillary outcomes. Rates of arterial and/or venous thromboembolism and adverse events did not differ across treatment groups.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In severely injured patients, early cold stored platelet transfusion is feasible, safe and did not result in a significant lower rate of 24-hour mortality. Early cold stored platelet transfusion did not result in a higher incidence of arterial and/or venous thrombotic complications or adverse events. The storage age of the cold stored platelet product was not associated with significant outcome differences.

Association of Changes in Antithrombin Activity Over Time With Responsiveness to Enoxaparin Prophylaxis and Risk of Trauma-Related Venous Thromboembolism

Importance

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) affects 2% to 20% of recovering trauma patients, despite aggressive prophylaxis with enoxaparin. Antithrombin is a primary circulating anticoagulant and crucial component of enoxaparin thromboprophylaxis. Approximately 20% of trauma patients present with antithrombin deficiency (antithrombin activity <80%).

Objective

To examine time-dependent changes in antithrombin activity, responsiveness to enoxaparin, as measured by anti-factor Xa (anti-FXa) levels, and incidence of VTE after severe trauma and to assess the association of ex vivo antithrombin supplementation with patients' sensitivity to enoxaparin prophylaxis.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This single-center, prospective cohort study was performed at a level 1 trauma center between January 7, 2019, and February 28, 2020. Adult trauma patients admitted to the trauma service at high risk for VTE, based on injury pattern and severity, were screened and enrolled. Patients who were older than 70 years, were pregnant, had a known immunologic or coagulation disorder, or were receiving prehospital anticoagulants were excluded.

Exposures

Blood samples were collected on emergency department arrival and daily for the first 8 days of hospitalization.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Patients' antithrombin activity and anti-FXa levels were measured by a coagulation analyzer, and thrombin generation was measured by calibrated automated thrombography. Responsiveness to enoxaparin was assessed by measuring anti-FXa levels 4 to 6 hours after the first daily enoxaparin dose and compared between patients who developed VTE and who did not. In addition, the associations of ex vivo supplementation of antithrombin with plasma anti-FXa levels were assessed.

Results

Among 150 patients enrolled (median [IQR] age, 35 [27-53] years; 37 [24.7%] female and 113 [75.3%] male; 5 [3.3%] Asian, 32 [21.3%] Black, and 113 [75.3%] White; and 51 [34.0%] of Hispanic ethnicity), 28 (18.7%) developed VTE. Patients with VTE had significantly lower antithrombin activity on admission compared with patients without VTE (median [IQR], 91% [79%-104%] vs 100% [88%-112%]; P = .04), as well as lower antithrombin activity on hospital days 5 (median (IQR), 90% [83%-99%] vs 114% [99%-130%]; P = .011), 6 (median [IQR], 97% [81%-109%] vs 123% [104%-134%]; P = .003), 7 (median [IQR], 82% [74%-89%] vs 123% [110%-140%]; P < .001), and 8 (median [IQR], 99% [85%-100%] vs 123% [109%-146%]; P = .011). Anti-FXa levels were significantly lower in patients with VTE vs those without VTE at hospital day 4 (median [IQR], 0.10 [0.05-0.14] IU/mL vs 0.18 [0.13-0.23] IU/mL; P = .006), day 6 (median [IQR], 0.12 [0.08-0.14] IU/mL vs 0.22 [0.13-0.28] IU/mL; P = .02), and day 7 (median [IQR], 0.11 [0.08-0.12] IU/mL vs 0.21 [0.13, 0.28] IU/mL; P = .002). Multivariable analyses found that for every 10% decrease in antithrombin activity during the first 3 days, the risk of VTE increased 1.5-fold.

Conclusions and Relevance

The results of this cohort study suggest that after severe trauma, antithrombin deficiency is common and contributes to enoxaparin resistance and VTE. Interventional studies are necessary to determine the efficacy of antithrombin supplementation in the reduction of VTE incidence.

Effect of Out-of-Hospital Tranexamic Acid vs Placebo on 6-Month Functional Neurologic Outcomes in Patients With Moderate or Severe Traumatic Brain Injury

IMPORTANCE

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is the leading cause of death and disability due to trauma. Early administration of tranexamic acid may benefit patients with TBI.

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether tranexamic acid treatment initiated in the out-of-hospital setting within 2 hours of injury improves neurologic outcome in patients with moderate or severe TBI.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

Multicenter, double-blinded, randomized clinical trial at 20 trauma centers and 39 emergency medical services agencies in the US and Canada from May 2015 to November 2017. Eligible participants (N = 1280) included out-of-hospital patients with TBI aged 15 years or older with Glasgow Coma Scale score of 12 or less and systolic blood pressure of 90 mm Hg or higher.

INTERVENTIONS

Three interventions were evaluated, with treatment initiated within 2 hours of TBI: out-of-hospital tranexamic acid (1 g) bolus and in-hospital tranexamic acid (1 g) 8-hour infusion (bolus maintenance group; n = 312), out-of-hospital tranexamic acid (2 g) bolus and in-hospital placebo 8-hour infusion (bolus only group; n = 345), and out-of-hospital placebo bolus and in-hospital placebo 8-hour infusion (placebo group; n = 309).

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The primary outcome was favorable neurologic function at 6 months (Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended score >4 [moderate disability or good recovery]) in the combined tranexamic acid group vs the placebo group. Asymmetric significance thresholds were set at 0.1 for benefit and 0.025 for harm. There were 18 secondary end points, of which 5 are reported in this article: 28-day mortality, 6-month Disability Rating Scale score (range, 0 [no disability] to 30 [death]), progression of intracranial hemorrhage, incidence of seizures, and incidence of thromboembolic events.

RESULTS

Among 1063 participants, a study drug was not administered to 96 randomized participants and 1 participant was excluded, resulting in 966 participants in the analysis population (mean age, 42 years; 255 [74%] male participants; mean Glasgow Coma Scale score, 8). Of these participants, 819 (84.8%) were available for primary outcome analysis at 6-month follow-up. The primary outcome occurred in 65% of patients in the tranexamic acid groups vs 62% in the placebo group (difference, 3.5%; [90% 1-sided confidence limit for benefit, -0.9%]; P = .16; [97.5% 1-sided confidence limit for harm, 10.2%]; P = .84). There was no statistically significant difference in 28-day mortality between the tranexamic acid groups vs the placebo group (14% vs 17%; difference, -2.9% [95% CI, -7.9% to 2.1%]; P = .26), 6-month Disability Rating Scale score (6.8 vs 7.6; difference, -0.9 [95% CI, -2.5 to 0.7]; P = .29), or progression of intracranial hemorrhage (16% vs 20%; difference, -5.4% [95% CI, -12.8% to 2.1%]; P = .16).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Among patients with moderate to severe TBI, out-of-hospital tranexamic acid administration within 2 hours of injury compared with placebo did not significantly improve 6-month neurologic outcome as measured by the Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01990768.

Impact of Social Media on Community Consultation in Exception From Informed Consent Clinical Trials

BACKGROUND

Exception from informed consent (EFIC) allows clinician scientists to perform much needed emergency research. Obtaining this exception, however, requires many meetings with community groups for consultation, which can make the process time-consuming and expensive. We aim to determine the impact of using social media in lieu of some community meetings in an effort to obtain an EFIC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

An economic analysis of four randomized clinical trials was performed. Costs were conservatively estimated using personnel costs, social media costs, and adjusted to 2016 US dollars. People were considered reached if they attended a community meeting or were directed to the study website by social media and spent ≥1 min.

RESULTS

The Early Whole Blood study required 14 meetings, reached 272 people, and cost $8260 ($30/person reached). The Pragmatic, Randomized Optimal Platelet and Plasma Ratios study required 14 meetings, reached 260 people, and cost $7479 overall ($29/person reached). The Prehospital Tranexamic Acid Use for Traumatic Brain Injury study required 12 meetings, reached 198 people, and cost $6340 ($32/person reached). Only the damage control laparotomy trial utilized social media in lieu of some community meetings. The damage control laparotomy trial required six meetings at which 137 people were reached. The $1000 social media campaign reached 229 people. The cost was $3977 overall and $11/person reached.

CONCLUSIONS

Including a social media campaign during the EFIC process increased the number of potential patients reached and reduced total and per person costs reached costs. Obtaining an EFIC for future emergency clinical trials may be facilitated by the inclusion of a social media campaign.

The Effects of Missed Doses of Antibiotics on Hospitalized Patient Outcomes

BACKGROUND

Missing doses of antibiotics in hospitalized patients is a well-described but inadequately recognized issue. We hypothesized that missing doses of antibiotics decreases quality of care.

METHODS

Retrospective study on patients admitted to the Shock Trauma ICU from February to June 2015. Patients prescribed a multidose course of antibiotics were evaluated. A missed antibiotic dose was one ordered but never given (a completely missed dose) or a dose that was not given within an hour before or after the planned time (an off-schedule missed dose). Patient outcomes included a positive culture, ventilator, ICU and hospital length of stay (LOS), and mortality. Multiple statistical methods were used as appropriate; significance was set as P < 0.05.

RESULTS

For the 5-mo study period, 280 patients were admitted and 200 met inclusion criteria. Eight percent of patients (16/200) did not miss any antibiotic doses, 39% (77/200) had only off-schedule doses, 2% (4/200) had only completely missed doses, and 51% (103/200) had both off-schedule and completely missed doses. For the 200 patients, 8167 doses were ordered and 2096 (26%) were missed. Adjusting for age, gender, BMI, injury severity score, and doses of antibiotics showed that those who miss doses off-schedule had longer LOS than those who do not miss doses of antibiotics. There was a significant nonlinear relationship between LOS and frequency of early (P-value = 0.02) and late (P-value = 0.01) doses.

CONCLUSIONS

To reduce length of hospital stay and optimize quality, methods to improve compliance with antibiotic dosing schedules should be investigated.

Multi-modal Analgesic Strategies for Trauma (MAST): protocol for a pragmatic randomized trial

BACKGROUND

Pain management after injury is critically important for functional recovery. Although opioids have been a mainstay for treatment of pain, they are associated with adverse events and may contribute to long-term use or abuse. Opioid-minimizing multimodal pain regimens have the potential to reduce exposure to opioids without compromising pain control. This article details an ongoing clinical trial comparing two pill-based, opioid-minimizing, multimodal pain strategies.

METHODS

This is a single-center, parallel-group, randomized, controlled comparative effectiveness trial comparing two multimodal pain regimens in adult trauma patients. All patients 16 years and older admitted to the Red Duke Trauma Institute are eligible unless they are pregnant, a prisoner, under observation status, or a non-acute trauma patient. At admission to the trauma service, patients are enrolled and randomized to one of two multimodal pain regimens. The primary outcome is opioid use, measured by morphine milligram equivalents per patient per day. The secondary outcomes include pain scores, ventilator days, hospital and intensive care unit lengths of stay, occurrence of opioid-related complications, hospital and pharmacy costs, and incidence of hospital discharge with opioid prescription. Outcomes will be compared using Bayesian methods.

DISCUSSION

This trial will determine the effectiveness of two multimodal pain treatment strategies on reducing in-hospital opioid exposure in adult trauma patients. Furthermore, it will compare the two strategies on pain control and patient safety. Knowledge gained in this study can improve quality of care at this hospital and other trauma centers regardless of which medication regimen proves superior.

Damage control laparotomy trial: design, rationale and implementation of a randomized controlled trial

Background

Damage control laparotomy (DCL) is an abbreviated operation intended to prevent the development of hypothermia, acidosis, and coagulopathy in seriously injured patients. The indications for DCL have since been broadened with no high-quality data to guide treatment. For patients with an indication for DCL, we aim to determine the effect of definitive laparotomy on patient morbidity.

Method

This is a pragmatic, parallel-group, randomized controlled pilot trial. Emergent laparotomy is defined as admission directly to the operating room from the emergency department within 90 min of arrival. DCL indications excluded from the study include packing of the liver or retroperitoneum, abdominal compartment syndrome prophylaxis, to expedite interventional radiology for hemorrhage control, and the need for ongoing transfusions and/or continuous vasopressor support. When a surgeon determines a DCL is indicated, the patient will be screened for inclusion and exclusion criteria. Patients with any indication for DCL that is not excluded are eligible for randomization. Patients will be randomized intraoperatively to DCL (control) or definitive fascial closure of the laparotomy (intervention). The primary outcome will be major abdominal complication or death within 30 days. Major abdominal complication is a composite outcome including fascial dehiscence, organ/space surgical site infection, enteric suture line failure, and unplanned reopening of the abdomen. Outcomes will be compared using both frequentist and Bayesian statistics.

Discussion

In patients with an indication for DCL, this trial will determine the effect of definitive laparotomy on major abdominal complications and death and will inform clinicians on the risks and benefits of this procedure. Regardless of the study outcome, the results will improve the quality of care provided to injured patients.

Trial registration number

NCT02706041.

Involvement of IL-8 in COX-2-Mediated Bone Metastases from Breast Cancer

BACKGROUND

Cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) overexpression by a primary tumor correlates with poor prognosis in breast cancer, including early spread to bone. Interleukin-8 (IL-8) stimulates osteoclastogenesis and resorption of bone, and elevated IL-8 levels predict early metastatic spread of breast cancer. The purpose of this study was to test our hypothesis that tumors that overexpress COX-2 induce IL-8 production.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We cotransfected MCF-10A (nonmalignant breast epithelial) cells, as well as MDA-231 (highly metastatic human breast cancer) cell lines with a pSG5-COX-2 vector and pEF1a-Luc-IRES-Neo vector (luciferase reporter). COX-2 overexpression was confirmed by Western blot and PGE2 (a product of the COX-2 pathway) immunoassay. IL-8 production was measured by immunoassay. In vivo testing used a nude mouse model to measure COX-2 and IL-8 production from breast cancer cells that had metastasized to bone (bone-seeking clones (BSCs)). Long bone metastases were localized and quantified by luciferase imaging (Xenogen IVIS system) and X-ray. BSCs were isolated and cultured and then tested for the production of PGE2 and IL-8.

RESULTS

COX-2 overexpression caused a 4- to 5-fold increase in IL-8 production in both MCF-10A and MDA-231 cells in vitro. In vivo, we observed that the MDA-231-BSC (metastatic cells isolated from bone metastases) produced significantly greater levels of both PGE2 and IL-8 compared to the parental MDA-231 cells (P < 0.01). In contrast to the results obtained with these estrogen receptor-negative cell lines, COX-2 expression failed to induce IL-8 in the MCF-7 estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer cell line. Treatment with the COX-2 inhibitor NS-398 at a low 1-mu[scap]M dose reduced the production of IL-8 in COX-2-transfected MDA-231 cells by 30%, thus confirming the involvement of COX-2 in IL-8 induction.

CONCLUSION

COX-2 expression induced formation of PGE2 and IL-8 in breast cancer cells. Since PGE2 and IL-8 stimulate osteoclasts to resorb bone, COX-2 inhibition is a potential target for treatment to prevent bone metastases.