1
|
Karabacak M, Jagtiani P, Zipser CM, Tetreault L, Davies B, Margetis K. Mapping the Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy Research Landscape: Topic Modeling of the Literature. Global Spine J 2024:21925682241256949. [PMID: 38760664 DOI: 10.1177/21925682241256949] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/19/2024] Open
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Topic modeling of literature. OBJECTIVES Our study has 2 goals: (i) to clarify key themes in degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) research, and (ii) to evaluate the current trends in the popularity or decline of these topics. Additionally, we aim to highlight the potential of natural language processing (NLP) in facilitating research syntheses. METHODS Documents were retrieved from Scopus, preprocessed, and modeled using BERTopic, an NLP-based topic modeling method. We specified a minimum topic size of 25 documents and 50 words per topic. After the models were trained, they generated a list of topics and corresponding representative documents. We utilized linear regression models to examine trends within the identified topics. In this context, topics exhibiting increasing linear slopes were categorized as "hot topics," while those with decreasing slopes were categorized as "cold topics". RESULTS Our analysis retrieved 3510 documents that were classified into 21 different topics. The 3 most frequently occurring topics were "OPLL" (ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament), "Anterior Fusion," and "Surgical Outcomes." Trend analysis revealed the hottest topics of the decade to be "Animal Models," "DCM in the Elderly," and "Posterior Decompression" while "Morphometric Analyses," "Questionnaires," and "MEP and SSEP" were identified as being the coldest topics. CONCLUSIONS Our NLP methodology conducted a thorough and detailed analysis of DCM research, uncovering valuable insights into research trends that were otherwise difficult to discern using traditional techniques. The results provide valuable guidance for future research directions, policy considerations, and identification of emerging trends.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mert Karabacak
- Department of Neurosurgery, Mount Sinai Health System, New York, NY, USA
| | - Pemla Jagtiani
- School of Medicine, SUNY Downstate Health Sciences University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Carl Moritz Zipser
- Spinal Cord Injury Center, Balgrist University Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Lindsay Tetreault
- Department of Neurology, New York University Langone, New York, NY, USA
| | - Benjamin Davies
- Department of Clinical Neurosurgery, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Jiang Z, Davies B, Zipser C, Margetis K, Martin A, Matsoukas S, Zipser-Mohammadzada F, Kheram N, Boraschi A, Zakin E, Obadaseraye OR, Fehlings MG, Wilson J, Yurac R, Cook CE, Milligan J, Tabrah J, Widdop S, Wood L, Roberts EA, Rujeedawa T, Tetreault L. The value of Clinical signs in the diagnosis of Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy - A Systematic review and Meta-analysis. Global Spine J 2024; 14:1369-1394. [PMID: 37903098 DOI: 10.1177/21925682231209869] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/01/2023] Open
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Delayed diagnosis of degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) is likely due to a combination of its subtle symptoms, incomplete neurological assessments by clinicians and a lack of public and professional awareness. Diagnostic criteria for DCM will likely facilitate earlier referral for definitive management. OBJECTIVES This systematic review aims to determine (i) the diagnostic accuracy of various clinical signs and (ii) the association between clinical signs and disease severity in DCM? METHODS A search was performed to identify studies on adult patients that evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of a clinical sign used for diagnosing DCM. Studies were also included if they assessed the association between the presence of a clinical sign and disease severity. The QUADAS-2 tool was used to evaluate the risk of bias of individual studies. RESULTS This review identified eleven studies that used a control group to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of various signs. An additional 61 articles reported on the frequency of clinical signs in a cohort of DCM patients. The most sensitive clinical tests for diagnosing DCM were the Tromner and hyperreflexia, whereas the most specific tests were the Babinski, Tromner, clonus and inverted supinator sign. Five studies evaluated the association between the presence of various clinical signs and disease severity. There was no definite association between Hoffmann sign, Babinski sign or hyperreflexia and disease severity. CONCLUSION The presence of clinical signs suggesting spinal cord compression should encourage health care professionals to pursue further investigation, such as neuroimaging to either confirm or refute a diagnosis of DCM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhilin Jiang
- King's College Hospital, NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | | | - Carl Zipser
- Spinal Cord Injury Center, Balgrist University Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland
| | | | - Allan Martin
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of California Davis, Sacramento, CA, USA
| | - Stavros Matsoukas
- Department of Neurosurgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY
| | | | - Najmeh Kheram
- Spinal Cord Injury Center, Balgrist University Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland
- The Interface Group, Institute of Physiology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Andrea Boraschi
- The Interface Group, Institute of Physiology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Elina Zakin
- New York University Langone, Department of Neurology, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Michael G Fehlings
- University of Toronto Division of Neurosurgery and Spinal Program, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Jamie Wilson
- University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA
| | - Ratko Yurac
- University del Desarrollo, Clinica Alemana de Santiago, Chile
| | | | - Jamie Milligan
- Department of Family Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, USA
| | - Julia Tabrah
- Hounslow and Richmond Community Healthcare, Teddington, UK
| | | | - Lianne Wood
- Nottingham University Hospital, Nottingham, UK
| | | | | | - Lindsay Tetreault
- New York University Langone, Department of Neurology, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Jiang Z, Davies B, Zipser C, Margetis K, Martin A, Matsoukas S, Zipser-Mohammadzada F, Kheram N, Boraschi A, Zakin E, Obadaseraye OR, Fehlings MG, Wilson J, Yurac R, Cook CE, Milligan J, Tabrah J, Widdop S, Wood L, Roberts EA, Rujeedawa T, Tetreault L. The Frequency of Symptoms in Patients With a Diagnosis of Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy: Results of a Scoping Review. Global Spine J 2024; 14:1395-1421. [PMID: 37917661 DOI: 10.1177/21925682231210468] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2023] Open
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Delayed diagnosis of degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) is associated with reduced quality of life and greater disability. Developing diagnostic criteria for DCM has been identified as a top research priority. OBJECTIVES This scoping review aims to address the following questions: What is the diagnostic accuracy and frequency of clinical symptoms in patients with DCM? METHODS A scoping review was conducted using a database of all primary DCM studies published between 2005 and 2020. Studies were included if they (i) assessed the diagnostic accuracy of a symptom using an appropriate control group or (ii) reported the frequency of a symptom in a cohort of DCM patients. RESULTS This review identified three studies that discussed the diagnostic accuracy of various symptoms and included a control group. An additional 58 reported on the frequency of symptoms in a cohort of patients with DCM. The most frequent and sensitive symptoms in DCM include unspecified paresthesias (86%), hand numbness (82%) and hand paresthesias (79%). Neck and/or shoulder pain was present in 51% of patients with DCM, whereas a minority had back (19%) or lower extremity pain (10%). Bladder dysfunction was uncommon (38%) although more frequent than bowel (23%) and sexual impairment (4%). Gait impairment is also commonly seen in patients with DCM (72%). CONCLUSION Patients with DCM present with many different symptoms, most commonly sensorimotor impairment of the upper extremities, pain, bladder dysfunction and gait disturbance. If patients present with a combination of these symptoms, further neuroimaging is indicated to confirm the diagnosis of DCM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhilin Jiang
- King's College Hospital, NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | | | - Carl Zipser
- Spinal Cord Injury Center, Balgrist University Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Konstantinos Margetis
- Department of Neurosurgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Allan Martin
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of California Davis, Davis, CA, USA
| | - Stavros Matsoukas
- Department of Neurosurgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Najmeh Kheram
- Spinal Cord Injury Center, Balgrist University Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland
- The Interface Group, Institute of Physiology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Andrea Boraschi
- The Interface Group, Institute of Physiology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Elina Zakin
- Department of Neurology, New York UniversityLangone, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Michael G Fehlings
- Division of Neurosurgery and Spinal Program, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Jamie Wilson
- University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA
| | - Ratko Yurac
- Professor of Orthopedics and Traumatology, University del Desarrollo, Clinica Alemana de Santiago, Santiago, Chile
| | - Chad E Cook
- Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Jamie Milligan
- Department of Family Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, USA
| | - Julia Tabrah
- Hounslow and Richmond Community Healthcare, London, UK
| | | | - Lianne Wood
- Nottingham University Hospital, Nottingham, UK
| | | | | | - Lindsay Tetreault
- Department of Neurology, New York UniversityLangone, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Matsoukas S, Zipser CM, Zipser-Mohammadzada F, Kheram N, Boraschi A, Jiang Z, Tetreault L, Fehlings MG, Davies BM, Margetis K. Scoping Review with Topic Modeling on the Diagnostic Criteria for Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy. Global Spine J 2024:21925682241237469. [PMID: 38442295 DOI: 10.1177/21925682241237469] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/07/2024] Open
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN This study is a scoping review. OBJECTIVE There is a broad variability in the definition of degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) and no standardized set of diagnostic criteria to date. METHODS We interrogated the Myelopathy.org database, a hand-indexed database of primary clinical studies conducted exclusively on DCM in humans between 2005-2021. The DCM inclusion criteria used in these studies were inputted into 3 topic modeling algorithms: Hierarchical Dirichlet Process (HDP), Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA), and BERtopic. The emerging topics were subjected to manual labeling and interpretation. RESULTS Of 1676 reports, 120 papers (7.16%) had well-defined inclusion criteria and were subjected to topic modeling. Four topics emerged from the HDP model: disturbance from extremity weakness and motor signs; fine-motor and sensory disturbance of upper extremity; a combination of imaging and clinical findings is required for the diagnosis; and "reinforcing" (or modifying) factors that can aid in the diagnosis in borderline cases. The LDA model showed the following topics: disturbance to the patient is required for the diagnosis; reinforcing factors can aid in the diagnosis in borderline cases; clinical findings from the extremities; and a combination of imaging and clinical findings is required for the diagnosis. BERTopic identified the following topics: imaging abnormality, typical clinical features, range of objective criteria, and presence of clinical findings. CONCLUSIONS This review provides quantifiable data that only a minority of past studies in DCM provided meaningful inclusion criteria. The items and patterns found here are very useful for the development of diagnostic criteria for DCM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stavros Matsoukas
- Department of Neurosurgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Carl Moritz Zipser
- Spinal Cord Injury Center, Balgrist University Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland
| | | | - Najmeh Kheram
- Spinal Cord Injury Center, Balgrist University Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland
- The Interface Group, Institute of Physiology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Andrea Boraschi
- The Interface Group, Institute of Physiology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Zhilin Jiang
- King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Lindsay Tetreault
- Department of Neurology, Langone Health, Graduate Medical Education, New York University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Michael G Fehlings
- Division of Neurosurgery and Spine Program, University of Toronto and Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Benjamin M Davies
- Myelopathy.org, International Charity for Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy, Cambridge, UK
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Konstantinos Margetis
- Department of Neurosurgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Hachem LD, Zhu M, Aarabi B, Davies B, DiGiorgio A, Evaniew N, Fehlings MG, Ganau M, Graves D, Guest J, Ha Y, Harrop J, Hofstetter C, Koljonen P, Kurpad S, Marco R, Martin AR, Nagoshi N, Nouri A, Rahimi-Movaghar V, Rodrigues-Pinto R, ter Wengel V, Tetreault L, Kwon B, Wilson JR. A Practical Classification System for Acute Cervical Spinal Cord Injury Based on a Three-Phased Modified Delphi Process From the AOSpine Spinal Cord Injury Knowledge Forum. Global Spine J 2024; 14:535-545. [PMID: 36065656 PMCID: PMC10802531 DOI: 10.1177/21925682221114800] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN A modified Delphi study. OBJECTIVE To assess current practice patterns in the management of cervical spinal cord injury (SCI) and develop a simplified, practical classification system which offers ease of use in the acute setting, incorporates modern diagnostic tools and provides utility in determining treatment strategies for cervical SCI. METHODS A three-phase modified Delphi procedure was performed between April 2020 and December 2021. During the first phase, members of the AOSpine SCI Knowledge forum proposed variables of importance for classifying and treating cervical SCI. The second phase involved an international survey of spine surgeons gauging practices surrounding the role and timing of surgery for cervical SCI and opinions regarding factors which most influence these practices. For the third phase, information obtained from phases 1 and 2 were used to draft a new classification system. RESULTS 396 surgeons responded to the survey. Neurological status, spinal stability and cord compression were the most important variables influencing decisions surrounding the role and timing of surgery. The majority (>50%) of respondents preferred to perform surgery within 24 hours post-SCI in clinical scenarios in which there was instability, severe cord compression or severe neurology. Situations in which <50% of respondents were inclined to operate early included: SCI with mild neurological impairments, with cord compression but without instability (with or without medical comorbidities), and SCI without cord compression or instability. CONCLUSIONS Spinal stability, cord compression and neurological status are the most important variables influencing surgeons' practices surrounding the surgical management of cervical SCI. Based on these results, a simplified classification system for acute cervical SCI has been proposed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Mary Zhu
- University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Bizhan Aarabi
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Maryland Medical System, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Benjamin Davies
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge UK
| | | | - Nathan Evaniew
- Department of Surgery, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, USA
| | | | - Mario Ganau
- Department of Neurosurgery, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | | | - James Guest
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Yoon Ha
- Yonsei University, Seodaemun-gu, Korea
| | - James Harrop
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | | | - Paul Koljonen
- Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | - Shekar Kurpad
- Department of Neurosurgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA
| | - Rex Marco
- Houston Methodist Orthopedics & Sports Medicine Texas Medical Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Allan R Martin
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California Davis, Sacramento, CA, USA
| | - Narihito Nagoshi
- Department of Orthopaedics, Keio University School of Medicine Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Aria Nouri
- Department of Neurosurgery, Hopitaux Universitaires de Geneve, Genève, Switzerland
| | | | | | - Valerie ter Wengel
- Department of Neurosurgery, Amsterdam UMC VUMC Site, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | | | - Brian Kwon
- Department of Orthopaedics, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Davies BM, Khan DZ, Barzangi K, Ali A, Mowforth OD, Nouri A, Harrop JS, Aarabi B, Rahimi-Movaghar V, Kurpad SN, Guest JD, Tetreault L, Kwon BK, Boerger TF, Rodrigues-Pinto R, Furlan JC, Chen R, Zipser CM, Curt A, Milligan J, Kalsi-Rayn S, Sarewitz E, Sadler I, Widdop S, Fehlings MG, Kotter MR. We Choose to Call it 'Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy': Findings of AO Spine RECODE-DCM, an International and Multi-Stakeholder Partnership to Agree a Standard Unifying Term and Definition for a Disease. Global Spine J 2024; 14:503-512. [PMID: 35769029 PMCID: PMC10802519 DOI: 10.1177/21925682221111780] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Modified DELPHI Consensus Process. OBJECTIVE To agree a single unifying term and definition. Globally, cervical myelopathy caused by degenerative changes to the spine is known by over 11 different names. This inconsistency contributes to many clinical and research challenges, including a lack of awareness. METHOD AO Spine RECODE-DCM (Research objectives and Common Data Elements Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy). To determine the index term, a longlist of candidate terms and their rationale, was created using a literature review and interviews. This was shared with the community, to select their preferred terms (248 members (58%) including 149 (60%) surgeons, 45 (18%) other healthcare professionals and 54 (22%) People with DCM or their supporters) and finalized using a consensus meeting. To determine a definition, a medical definition framework was created using inductive thematic analysis of selected International Classification of Disease definitions. Separately, stakeholders submitted their suggested definition which also underwent inductive thematic analysis (317 members (76%), 190 (59%) surgeons, 62 (20%) other healthcare professionals and 72 (23%) persons living with DCM or their supporters). Using this definition framework, a working definition was created based on submitted content, and finalized using consensus meetings. RESULTS Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy was selected as the unifying term, defined in short, as a progressive spinal cord injury caused by narrowing of the cervical spinal canal. CONCLUSION A consistent term and definition can support education and research initiatives. This was selected using a structured and iterative methodology, which may serve as an exemplar for others in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benjamin M. Davies
- Academic Neurosurgery Unit, Department of Clinical Neurosurgery, University of Cambridge, UK
- Myelopathy.org, UK
| | - Danyal Z Khan
- Department of Neurosurgery, Walton Centre, UK
- Wellcome / EPSRC Centre for Interventional and Surgical Sciences, University College London, UK
| | - Kara Barzangi
- Academic Neurosurgery Unit, Department of Clinical Neurosurgery, University of Cambridge, UK
| | - Ahmad Ali
- Department of Neurosurgery, Walton Centre, UK
| | - Oliver D. Mowforth
- Academic Neurosurgery Unit, Department of Clinical Neurosurgery, University of Cambridge, UK
- Myelopathy.org, UK
| | - Aria Nouri
- Department of Neurosurgery, Geneva University Hospital, University of Geneva, Switzerland
| | - James S. Harrop
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Bizhan Aarabi
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Vafa Rahimi-Movaghar
- Department of Neurosurgery, Sina Trauma and Surgery Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Iran
| | - Shekar N Kurpad
- Department of Neurosurgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Wauwatosa, WI, USA
| | - James D. Guest
- Department of Neurosurgery and The Miami Project to Cure Paralysis, The Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Lindsay Tetreault
- Department of Neurology, New York University Langone Health, New York, NY, USA
| | - Brian K. Kwon
- Department of Orthopaedics, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Timothy F Boerger
- Department of Neurosurgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Wauwatosa, WI, USA
| | - Ricardo Rodrigues-Pinto
- Spinal Unit (UVM), Department of Orthopaedics, Centro Hospitalar Universitário do Porto - Hospital de Santo António, Portugal
- Instituto de Ciências Biomédicas Abel Salazar, Portugal
| | - Julio C. Furlan
- Department of Medicine, Division of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Robert Chen
- Division of Neurology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | | - Armin Curt
- University Spine Center, Balgrist University Hospital, Switzerland
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Michael G. Fehlings
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Mark R.N. Kotter
- Academic Neurosurgery Unit, Department of Clinical Neurosurgery, University of Cambridge, UK
- Myelopathy.org, UK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Sangeorzan I, Antonacci G, Martin A, Grodzinski B, Zipser CM, Murphy RKJ, Andriopoulou P, Cook CE, Anderson DB, Guest J, Furlan JC, Kotter MRN, Boerger TF, Sadler I, Roberts EA, Wood H, Fraser C, Fehlings MG, Kumar V, Jung J, Milligan J, Nouri A, Martin AR, Blizzard T, Vialle LR, Tetreault L, Kalsi-Ryan S, MacDowall A, Martin-Moore E, Burwood M, Wood L, Lalkhen A, Ito M, Wilson N, Treanor C, Dugan S, Davies BM. Toward Shared Decision-Making in Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Study. JMIR Res Protoc 2023; 12:e46809. [PMID: 37812472 PMCID: PMC10594151 DOI: 10.2196/46809] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2023] [Revised: 06/07/2023] [Accepted: 06/08/2023] [Indexed: 10/10/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Health care decisions are a critical determinant in the evolution of chronic illness. In shared decision-making (SDM), patients and clinicians work collaboratively to reach evidence-based health decisions that align with individual circumstances, values, and preferences. This personalized approach to clinical care likely has substantial benefits in the oversight of degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM), a type of nontraumatic spinal cord injury. Its chronicity, heterogeneous clinical presentation, complex management, and variable disease course engenders an imperative for a patient-centric approach that accounts for each patient's unique needs and priorities. Inadequate patient knowledge about the condition and an incomplete understanding of the critical decision points that arise during the course of care currently hinder the fruitful participation of health care providers and patients in SDM. This study protocol presents the rationale for deploying SDM for DCM and delineates the groundwork required to achieve this. OBJECTIVE The study's primary outcome is the development of a comprehensive checklist to be implemented upon diagnosis that provides patients with essential information necessary to support their informed decision-making. This is known as a core information set (CIS). The secondary outcome is the creation of a detailed process map that provides a diagrammatic representation of the global care workflows and cognitive processes involved in DCM care. Characterizing the critical decision points along a patient's journey will allow for an effective exploration of SDM tools for routine clinical practice to enhance patient-centered care and improve clinical outcomes. METHODS Both CISs and process maps are coproduced iteratively through a collaborative process involving the input and consensus of key stakeholders. This will be facilitated by Myelopathy.org, a global DCM charity, through its Research Objectives and Common Data Elements for Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy community. To develop the CIS, a 3-round, web-based Delphi process will be used, starting with a baseline list of information items derived from a recent scoping review of educational materials in DCM, patient interviews, and a qualitative survey of professionals. A priori criteria for achieving consensus are specified. The process map will be developed iteratively using semistructured interviews with patients and professionals and validated by key stakeholders. RESULTS Recruitment for the Delphi consensus study began in April 2023. The pilot-testing of process map interview participants started simultaneously, with the formulation of an initial baseline map underway. CONCLUSIONS This protocol marks the first attempt to provide a starting point for investigating SDM in DCM. The primary work centers on developing an educational tool for use in diagnosis to enable enhanced onward decision-making. The wider objective is to aid stakeholders in developing SDM tools by identifying critical decision junctures in DCM care. Through these approaches, we aim to provide an exhaustive launchpad for formulating SDM tools in the wider DCM community. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID) DERR1-10.2196/46809.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Grazia Antonacci
- Department of Primary Care and Public Health, National Institute of Health Research (NIHR) Applied Research Collaboration (ARC) Northwest London, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
- Centre for Health Economics and Policy Innovation (CHEPI), Business School, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Anne Martin
- Faculty of Medicine, Health and Social Care, Canterbury Christ Church University, Canterbury, United Kingdom
| | - Ben Grodzinski
- University Hospitals Sussex, NHS Foundation Trust, Brighton, United Kingdom
| | - Carl M Zipser
- Spinal Cord Injury Center, Balgrist University Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Rory K J Murphy
- Department of Neurosurgery, Barrow Neurological Institute, St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, AZ, United States
| | - Panoraia Andriopoulou
- Psychology Department, School of Social Sciences, University of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece
| | - Chad E Cook
- Division of Physical Therapy, School of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, CA, United States
- Department of Orthopaedics, School of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, CA, United States
- Department of Population Health Sciences, School of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, CA, United States
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University, Durham, CA, United States
| | - David B Anderson
- Sydney School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - James Guest
- The Miami Project to Cure Paralysis, The Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, FL, United States
| | - Julio C Furlan
- Division of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- The KITE Research Institute, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Mark R N Kotter
- Myelopathy.org, Cambridge, United Kingdom
- Department of Clinical Neurosurgery, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Timothy F Boerger
- Department of Neurosurgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, United States
| | | | | | - Helen Wood
- Myelopathy.org, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Christine Fraser
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Stirling, Scotland, United Kingdom
- Physiotherapy Department, National Health Service Lothian, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - Michael G Fehlings
- Division of Neurosurgery and Spine Program, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Division of Neurosurgery, Krembil Neuroscience Centre, Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Vishal Kumar
- Department of Orthopaedics, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
- Department of Orthopaedics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Deoghar, India
| | - Josephine Jung
- Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College, London, United Kingdom
- Department of Neurosurgery, King's College Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - James Milligan
- Department of Family Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Aria Nouri
- Division of Neurosurgery, Geneva University Hospitals, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Allan R Martin
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, United States
| | | | - Luiz Roberto Vialle
- School of Medicine, Pontifical Catholic University of Paraná, Curitiba, Brazil
| | - Lindsay Tetreault
- Department of Neurology, New York University, New York, NY, United States
| | - Sukhvinder Kalsi-Ryan
- The KITE Research Institute, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Anna MacDowall
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University and Department of Orthopaedics, The Academic Hospital of Uppsala, Uppsala, Sweden
| | | | | | - Lianne Wood
- Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, United Kingdom
- NeuroSpinal Assessment Unit, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, United Kingdom
| | - Abdul Lalkhen
- Northern Care Alliance, Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Manabu Ito
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, National Hospital Organization Hokkaido Medical Center, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Nicky Wilson
- Physiotherapy Department, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Caroline Treanor
- Department of Physiotherapy, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
- Department of Neurosurgery, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
- School of Physiotherapy, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland
| | | | - Benjamin M Davies
- Myelopathy.org, Cambridge, United Kingdom
- Department of Clinical Neurosurgery, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Davies B, Brannigan J, Mowforth OD, Khan D, McNair AGK, Tetreault L, Sadler I, Sarewitz E, Aarabi B, Kwon B, Gronlund T, Rahimi-Movaghar V, Zipser CM, Hutchinson PJ, Kurpad S, Harrop JS, Wilson JR, Guest JD, Fehlings MG, Kotter MRN. Secondary analysis of a James Lind Alliance priority setting partnership to facilitate knowledge translation in degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM): insights from AO Spine RECODE-DCM. BMJ Open 2023; 13:e064296. [PMID: 37463815 PMCID: PMC10357680 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-064296] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/20/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To explore whether a James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnership could provide insights on knowledge translation within the field of degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM). DESIGN Secondary analysis of a James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnership process for DCM. PARTICIPANTS AND SETTING DCM stake holders, including spinal surgeons, people with myelopathy and other healthcare professionals, were surveyed internationally. Research suggestions submitted by stakeholders but considered answered were identified. Sampling characteristics of respondents were compared with the overall cohort to identify subgroups underserved by current knowledge translation. RESULTS The survey was completed by 423 individuals from 68 different countries. A total of 22% of participants submitted research suggestions that were considered 'answered'. There was a significant difference between responses from different stakeholder groups (p<0.005). Spinal surgeons were the group which was most likely to submit an 'answered' research question. Respondents from South America were also most likely to submit 'answered' questions, when compared with other regions. However, there was no significant difference between responses from different stakeholder regions (p=0.4). CONCLUSIONS Knowledge translation challenges exist within DCM. This practical approach to measuring knowledge translation may offer a more responsive assessment to guide interventions, complementing existing metrics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benjamin Davies
- Department of Clinical Neurosurgery, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Jamie Brannigan
- School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Oliver D Mowforth
- Department of Clinical Neurosurgery, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Danyal Khan
- Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK
| | - Angus G K McNair
- Centre for Surgical Research, Bristol Medical School, Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
- Department of General Surgery, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, UK
| | - Lindsay Tetreault
- Department of Medicine, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland
- Division of Neurosurgery and Spine Program, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | | | - Bizhan Aarabi
- Division of Neurosurgery, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Brian Kwon
- Division of Spine Surgery, Vancouver General Hospital, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Toto Gronlund
- National Institute for Health Research, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Vafa Rahimi-Movaghar
- Academic Department of Neurological Surgery, Sina Trauma and Surgery Research Center, Tehran, Iran (the Islamic Republic of)
| | - Carl Moritz Zipser
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Balgrist, Zurich, Switzerland
| | | | - Shekar Kurpad
- Division of Neurosurgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA
| | - James S Harrop
- Division of Neurosurgery, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Jefferson Health System, St Louis, Mississippi, USA
| | - Jefferson R Wilson
- Division of Neurosurgery and Spine Program, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - James D Guest
- Department of Neurosurgery and The Miami Project to Cure Paralysis, The Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Michael G Fehlings
- Division of Neurosurgery and Spine Program, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Mark R N Kotter
- Department of Clinical Neurosurgery, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Mowforth OD, Burn L, Khan DZ, Yang X, Stacpoole SRL, Gronlund T, Tetreault L, Kalsi-Ryan S, Starkey ML, Sadler I, Sarewitz E, Houlton D, Carter J, Howard P, Rahimi-Movaghar V, Guest JD, Aarabi B, Kwon BK, Kurpad SN, Harrop J, Wilson JR, Grossman R, Smith EK, McNair A, Fehlings MG, Kotter MRN, Davies BM. Lived experience-centred word clouds may improve research uncertainty gathering in priority setting partnerships. BMC Med Res Methodol 2023; 23:100. [PMID: 37087419 PMCID: PMC10122197 DOI: 10.1186/s12874-023-01897-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2022] [Accepted: 03/20/2023] [Indexed: 04/24/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION AO Spine RECODE-DCM was a multi-stakeholder priority setting partnership (PSP) to define the top ten research priorities for degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM). Priorities were generated and iteratively refined using a series of surveys administered to surgeons, other healthcare professionals (oHCP) and people with DCM (PwDCM). The aim of this work was to utilise word clouds to enable the perspectives of people with the condition to be heard earlier in the PSP process than is traditionally the case. The objective was to evaluate the added value of word clouds in the process of defining research uncertainties in National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) James Lind Alliance (JLA) Priority Setting Partnerships. METHODS Patient-generated word clouds were created for the four survey subsections of the AO Spine RECODE-DCM PSP: diagnosis, treatment, long-term management and other issues. These were then evaluated as a nested methodological study. Word-clouds were created and iteratively refined by an online support group of people with DCM, before being curated by the RECODE-DCM management committee and expert healthcare professional representatives. The final word clouds were embedded within the surveys administered at random to 50% of participants. DCM research uncertainties suggested by participants were compared pre- and post-word cloud presentation. RESULTS A total of 215 (50.9%) participants were randomised to the word cloud stream, including 118 (55%) spinal surgeons, 52 (24%) PwDCM and 45 (21%) oHCP. Participants submitted 434 additional uncertainties after word cloud review: word count was lower and more uniform across each survey subsections compared to pre-word cloud uncertainties. Twenty-three (32%) of the final 74 PSP summary questions did not have a post-word cloud contribution and no summary question was formed exclusively on post-word cloud uncertainties. There were differences in mapping of pre- and post-word cloud uncertainties to summary questions, with greater mapping of post-word cloud uncertainties to the number 1 research question priority: raising awareness. Five of the final summary questions were more likely to map to the research uncertainties suggested by participants after having reviewed the word clouds. CONCLUSIONS Word clouds may increase the perspective of underrepresented stakeholders in the research question gathering stage of priority setting partnerships. This may help steer the process towards research questions that are of highest priority for people with the condition.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Oliver D Mowforth
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Lance Burn
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Danyal Z Khan
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Xiaoyu Yang
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Sybil R L Stacpoole
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, North West Anglia NHS Foundation Trust and Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Toto Gronlund
- James Lind Alliance, National Institute for Health Research, Southampton, UK
| | - Lindsay Tetreault
- Division of Neurosurgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | | - Michelle L Starkey
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Iwan Sadler
- Myelopathy.Org, (Registered Charity England and Wales, No 1178673), Cambridge, UK
| | - Ellen Sarewitz
- The Goffin Consultancy, Goffin Consultancy Ltd, Riding House, Stelling Minnis, Bossingham Road, Canterbury, CT4 6AZ, UK
| | - Delphine Houlton
- Myelopathy.Org, (Registered Charity England and Wales, No 1178673), Cambridge, UK
| | - Julia Carter
- Myelopathy.Org, (Registered Charity England and Wales, No 1178673), Cambridge, UK
| | - Paige Howard
- US Person with DCM Representative - CSU, Bakersfield, CA, USA
| | - Vafa Rahimi-Movaghar
- Academic Department of Neurological Surgery, Sina Trauma and Surgery Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - James D Guest
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Bizhan Aarabi
- Division of Neurosurgery, Shock Trauma, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Brian K Kwon
- Division of Spine Surgery, Vancouver General Hospital, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Shekar N Kurpad
- Department of Neurosurgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA
| | - James Harrop
- Division of Neurosurgery, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | | | - Robert Grossman
- Division of Neurosurgery, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Emma K Smith
- School of General Practice, NHS Health Education East of England, London, UK
| | - Angus McNair
- Center for Surgical Research, Bristol Medical School: Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | | | - Mark R N Kotter
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
- Wellcome Trust & MRC Cambridge Stem Cell Institute, Cambridge, UK
| | - Benjamin M Davies
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Tetreault L, Kalsi-Ryan S, Benjamin Davies, Nanna-Lohkamp L, Garwood P, Martin AR, Wilson JR, Harrop JS, Guest JD, Kwon BK, Milligan J, Arizala AM, Kotter MR, Fehlings MG. Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy: A Practical Approach to Diagnosis. Global Spine J 2022; 12:1881-1893. [PMID: 35043715 PMCID: PMC9609530 DOI: 10.1177/21925682211072847] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Narrative Review. OBJECTIVES The objective of this review is to provide a stepwise approach to the assessment of patients with potential symptoms of degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM). METHODS N/A. RESULTS DCM is an overarching term used to describe progressive compression of the cervical spinal cord by age-related changes to the spinal axis. These alterations to normal anatomy narrow the spinal canal, reduce the space available for the spinal cord, and may ultimately compress the ascending and descending neural tracts. Patients with DCM present with a wide range of symptoms that can significantly impact quality of life, including bilateral hand numbness and paresthesia, gait impairment, motor weakness of the upper and lower extremities, and bladder and bowel dysfunction. Unfortunately, DCM is often misdiagnosed, resulting in delayed assessment and management by the appropriate specialist. The proper evaluation of a patient with suspected DCM includes obtaining a detailed patient history, conducting a comprehensive neurological examination, and ordering appropriate tests to rule in or out other diagnoses. CONCLUSION This review summarizes a stepwise approach to the diagnosis of patients with DCM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lindsay Tetreault
- Division of Neurology, Graduate
Medical Education, New York University
Langone, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Benjamin Davies
- Department of Academic
Neurosurgery, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Laura Nanna-Lohkamp
- Division of Neurosurgery,
Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada,Division of Neurosurgery, Spinal
Program, Toronto Western Hospital, University Health
Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Philip Garwood
- Internal Medicine Resident,
Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Allan R. Martin
- Spine Neurosurgery, University of California
Davis, Davis, CA, USA
| | - Jefferson R. Wilson
- Division of Neurosurgery,
Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - James S. Harrop
- Departments of Neurological and
Orthopedic Surgery, Thomas Jefferson
University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - James D. Guest
- The Miami Project to Cure
Paralysis, University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Brian K. Kwon
- Department, of Orthopaedics, University of British
Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - James Milligan
- Department of Family Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | | | - Mark R. Kotter
- Department of Academic
Neurosurgery, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Michael G. Fehlings
- Division of Neurosurgery,
Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada,Division of Neurosurgery, Spinal
Program, Toronto Western Hospital, University Health
Network, Toronto, ON, Canada,Michael G. Fehlings, MD, PhD, FRCSC, FACS,
Division of Neurosurgery and Spinal Program, Department of Surgery, University
of Toronto, Krembil Neuroscience Centre, Toronto Western Hospital, 399 Bathurst
Street, Suite 4WW-449, Toronto, ON M5T 2S8, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Tetreault L, Lange SF, Chotai S, Lupo M, Kryshtalskyj MT, Wilson JR, Martin AR, Davies BM, Nater A, Devin C, Fehlings MG. A Systematic Review of Definitions for Dysphagia and Dysphonia in Patients Treated Surgically for Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy. Global Spine J 2022; 12:1535-1545. [PMID: 34409882 PMCID: PMC9393984 DOI: 10.1177/21925682211035714] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Systematic review. Surgical decompression for degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) is associated with perioperative complications, including difficulty or discomfort with swallowing (dysphagia) as well as changes in sound production (dysphonia). This systematic review aims to (1) outline how dysphagia and dysphonia are defined in the literature and (2) assess the quality of definitions using a novel 4-point rating system. METHODS An electronic database search was conducted for studies that reported on dysphagia, dysphonia or other related complications of DCM surgery. Data extracted included study design, surgical details, as well as definitions and rates of surgical complications. A 4-point rating scale was developed to assess the quality of definitions for each complication. RESULTS Our search yielded 2,673 unique citations, 11 of which met eligibility criteria and were summarized in this review. Defined complications included odynophagia (n = 1), dysphagia (n = 11), dysphonia (n = 2), perioperative swelling complications (n = 2), and soft tissue swelling (n = 3). Rates of dysphagia varied substantially (0.0%-50.0%) depending on whether this complication was patient-reported (4.4%); patient-reported using a modified Swallowing Quality of Life questionnaire (43.1%) or the Bazaz criteria (8.8%-50.0%); or diagnosed using an extensive protocol consisting of clinical assessment, a bedside swallowing test, evaluation by a speech and language pathologist and a modified barium swallowing test/fiberoptic endoscopy (42.9%). The reported incidences of dysphonia also ranged significantly from 0.6% to 38.0%. CONCLUSION There is substantial variability in reported rates of dysphagia and dysphonia due to differences in data collection methods, diagnostic strategies, and definitions. Consolidation of nomenclature will improve evaluation of the overall safety of surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lindsay Tetreault
- Spinal Cord Injury Clinical Research Unit, Krembil Neuroscience Center, Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada,University College Cork, Graduate Entry Medicine, Cork, Ireland
| | - Stefan F. Lange
- Spinal Cord Injury Clinical Research Unit, Krembil Neuroscience Center, Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada,University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Silky Chotai
- Department of Orthopaedics and Neurological Surgery, Spine Outcomes Research Laboratory, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Mercedes Lupo
- University College Cork, Graduate Entry Medicine, Cork, Ireland
| | - Michael T. Kryshtalskyj
- Spinal Cord Injury Clinical Research Unit, Krembil Neuroscience Center, Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jefferson R. Wilson
- Department of Neurosurgery, St. Michael’s Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Allan R. Martin
- Spinal Cord Injury Clinical Research Unit, Krembil Neuroscience Center, Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada,Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Benjamin M. Davies
- Department of Clinical Neurosurgery, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Anick Nater
- Spinal Cord Injury Clinical Research Unit, Krembil Neuroscience Center, Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada,Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Clinton Devin
- Department of Orthopaedics and Neurological Surgery, Spine Outcomes Research Laboratory, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Michael G. Fehlings
- Spinal Cord Injury Clinical Research Unit, Krembil Neuroscience Center, Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada,Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada,Michael G. Fehlings, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto; Division of Neurosurgery and Spinal Program, Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network, 399 Bathurst St., Suite 4W-449, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5T 2S8.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Zipser CM, Fehlings MG, Margetis K, Curt A, Betz M, Sadler I, Tetreault L, Davies BM. Proposing a Framework to Understand the Role of Imaging in Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy: Enhancement of MRI Protocols Needed for Accurate Diagnosis and Evaluation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2022; 47:1259-1262. [PMID: 35857708 PMCID: PMC9365266 DOI: 10.1097/brs.0000000000004389] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2022] [Accepted: 03/30/2022] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Carl M. Zipser
- Spinal Cord Injury Center, Balgrist University Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Michael G. Fehlings
- Division of Neurosurgery and Spinal Program, University of Toronto and Krembil Brain Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | | - Armin Curt
- Spinal Cord Injury Center, Balgrist University Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Michael Betz
- University Spine Center, Balgrist University Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Iwan Sadler
- Myelopathy Support, Myelopathy.org, Cambridge, UK
| | - Lindsay Tetreault
- Department of Neurology, NYU Langone Health, Graduate Medical Education, New York, NY
| | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Davies BM, Yanez Touzet A, Mowforth OD, Lee KS, Khan D, Furlan JC, Fehlings MG, Harrop JS, Zipser CM, Rodrigues-Pinto R, Milligan J, Sarewitz E, Curt A, Rahimi-Movaghar V, Aarabi B, Boerger TF, Tetreault L, Chen R, Guest JD, Kalsi-Ryan S, Sadler I, Widdop S, McNair AGK, Kwon BK, Kotter MRN. Development of a core measurement set for research in degenerative cervical myelopathy: a study protocol (AO Spine RECODE-DCM CMS). BMJ Open 2022; 12:e060436. [PMID: 35680260 PMCID: PMC9185555 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-060436] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Progress in degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) is hindered by inconsistent measurement and reporting. This impedes data aggregation and outcome comparison across studies. This limitation can be reversed by developing a core measurement set (CMS) for DCM research. Previously, the AO Spine Research Objectives and Common Data Elements for DCM (AO Spine RECODE-DCM) defined 'what' should be measured in DCM: the next step of this initiative is to determine 'how' to measure these features. This protocol outlines the steps necessary for the development of a CMS for DCM research and audit. METHODS AND ANALYSIS The CMS will be developed in accordance with the guidance developed by the Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials and the Consensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement Instruments. The process involves five phases. In phase 1, the steering committee agreed on the constructs to be measured by sourcing consensus definitions from patients, professionals and the literature. In phases 2 and 3, systematic reviews were conducted to identify tools for each construct and aggregate their evidence. Constructs with and without tools were identified, and scoping reviews were conducted for constructs without tools. Evidence on measurement properties, as well as on timing of assessments, are currently being aggregated. These will be presented in phase 4: a consensus meeting where a multi-disciplinary panel of experts will select the instruments that will form the CMS. Following selection, guidance on the implementation of the CMS will be developed and disseminated (phase 5). A preliminary CMS review scheduled at 4 years from release. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION Ethical approval was obtained from the University of Cambridge (HBREC2019.14). Dissemination strategies will include peer-reviewed scientific publications; conference presentations; podcasts; the identification of AO Spine RECODE-DCM ambassadors; and engagement with relevant journals, funders and the DCM community.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benjamin M Davies
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Alvaro Yanez Touzet
- School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Oliver D Mowforth
- Department of Academic Neurosurgery, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Keng Siang Lee
- Bristol Medical School, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Danyal Khan
- Academic Neurosurgery Unit, University College London, London, UK
| | - Julio C Furlan
- Department of Medicine, Division of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Michael G Fehlings
- Division of Neurosurgery and Spinal Program, Toronto Western Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - James S Harrop
- Thomas Jefferson University, Jefferson Health System, St Louis, Missouri, USA
| | | | - Ricardo Rodrigues-Pinto
- Spinal Unit (UVM), Department of Orthopaedics, Centro Hospitalar Universitário do Porto EPE, Porto, Portugal
- Instituto de Ciências Biomédicas Abel Salazar, Porto, Portugal
| | - James Milligan
- Family Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Armin Curt
- University Hospital Balgrist, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Vafa Rahimi-Movaghar
- Academic Department of Neurological Surgery, Sina Trauma and Surgery Research Center, Tehran, Iran
| | - Bizhan Aarabi
- Division of Neurosurgery, University of Maryland Baltimore, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Timothy F Boerger
- Neurosurgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Wauwatosa, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Lindsay Tetreault
- Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Medicine, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland
| | - Robert Chen
- Neurology, Toronto Western Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - James D Guest
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA
| | | | | | | | - Angus G K McNair
- Centre for Surgical Research, Bristol Medical School: Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, Avon, UK
- GI Surgery, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, UK
| | - Brian K Kwon
- Department of Orthopaedics, University of British Columbia, Blusson Spinal Cord Center, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Mark R N Kotter
- Department of Clinical Neurosurgery, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Ann McLaren Laboratory of Regenerative Medicine, Cambridge, UK
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Martin AR, Tetreault L, Nouri A, Curt A, Freund P, Rahimi-Movaghar V, Wilson JR, Fehlings MG, Kwon BK, Harrop JS, Davies BM, Kotter MRN, Guest JD, Aarabi B, Kurpad SN. Imaging and Electrophysiology for Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy [AO Spine RECODE-DCM Research Priority Number 9]. Global Spine J 2022; 12:130S-146S. [PMID: 34797993 PMCID: PMC8859711 DOI: 10.1177/21925682211057484] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Narrative review. OBJECTIVE The current review aimed to describe the role of existing techniques and emerging methods of imaging and electrophysiology for the management of degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM), a common and often progressive condition that causes spinal cord dysfunction and significant morbidity globally. METHODS A narrative review was conducted to summarize the existing literature and highlight future directions. RESULTS Anatomical magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is well established in the literature as the key imaging tool to identify spinal cord compression, disc herniation/bulging, and inbuckling of the ligamentum flavum, thus facilitating surgical planning, while radiographs and computed tomography (CT) provide complimentary information. Electrophysiology techniques are primarily used to rule out competing diagnoses. However, signal change and measures of cord compression on conventional MRI have limited utility to characterize the degree of tissue injury, which may be helpful for diagnosis, prognostication, and repeated assessments to identify deterioration. Early translational studies of quantitative imaging and electrophysiology techniques show potential of these methods to more accurately reflect changes in spinal cord microstructure and function. CONCLUSION Currently, clinical management of DCM relies heavily on anatomical MRI, with additional contributions from radiographs, CT, and electrophysiology. Novel quantitative assessments of microstructure, perfusion, and function have the potential to transform clinical practice, but require robust validation, automation, and standardization prior to uptake.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Allan R. Martin
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California Davis, Davis, CA, USA
| | - Lindsay Tetreault
- Department of Neurology, New York University, Langone Health, Graduate Medical Education, New York, NY, USA
| | - Aria Nouri
- Division of Neurosurgery, Geneva University Hospitals, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Armin Curt
- University Spine Center, Balgrist University Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Patrick Freund
- University Spine Center, Balgrist University Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Vafa Rahimi-Movaghar
- Department of Neurosurgery, Sina Trauma and Surgery Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Jefferson R. Wilson
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Michael G. Fehlings
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Brian K. Kwon
- Vancouver Spine Surgery Institute, Department of Orthopedics, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - James S. Harrop
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | | | | | - James D. Guest
- Department of Neurosurgery and The Miami Project to Cure Paralysis, The Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Bizhan Aarabi
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Shekar N Kurpad
- Department of Neurosurgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Wauwatosa, WI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Mowforth OD, Khan DZ, Wong MY, Pickering GAE, Dean L, Magee J, Mullarkey L, Hirayama Y, Rihova M, Butler M, Stewart M, Goulson B, Ahmed S, Fricke K, Popa-Nimigean V, Millar Z, Venkatesh A, Willison A, Senthil K, Hazenbiller O, Sarewitz E, Sadler I, Gronlund T, Tetreault L, Harrop JS, Aarabi B, Rahimi-Movaghar V, Kurpad SN, Guest JD, Wilson JR, Kwon BK, Fehlings MG, McNair AG, Davies BM, Kotter MR. Gathering Global Perspectives to Establish the Research Priorities and Minimum Data Sets for Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy: Sampling Strategy of the First Round Consensus Surveys of AO Spine RECODE-DCM. Global Spine J 2022; 12:8S-18S. [PMID: 34879754 PMCID: PMC8859701 DOI: 10.1177/21925682211047546] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Survey. INTRODUCTION AO Spine Research Objectives and Common Data Elements for Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy (AO Spine RECODE-DCM) is an international initiative that aims to accelerate knowledge discovery and improve outcomes by developing a consensus framework for research. This includes defining the top research priorities, an index term and a minimum data set (core outcome set and core data elements set - core outcome set (COS)/core data elements (CDE)). OBJECTIVE To describe how perspectives were gathered and report the detailed sampling characteristics. METHODS A two-stage, electronic survey was used to gather and seek initial consensus. Perspectives were sought from spinal surgeons, other healthcare professionals and people with degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM). Participants were allocated to one of two parallel streams: (1) priority setting or (2) minimum dataset. An email campaign was developed to advertise the survey to relevant global stakeholder individuals and organisations. People with DCM were recruited using the international DCM charity Myelopathy.org and its social media channels. A network of global partners was recruited to act as project ambassadors. Data from Google Analytics, MailChimp and Calibrum helped optimise survey dissemination. RESULTS Survey engagement was high amongst the three stakeholder groups: 208 people with DCM, 389 spinal surgeons and 157 other healthcare professionals. Individuals from 76 different countries participated; the United States, United Kingdom and Canada were the most common countries of participants. CONCLUSION AO Spine RECODE-DCM recruited a diverse and sufficient number of participants for an international PSP and COS/CDE process. Whilst PSP and COS/CDE have been undertaken in other fields, to our knowledge, this is the first time they have been combined in one process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Oliver D. Mowforth
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge; Addenbrooke's Hospital, UK
| | - Danyal Z Khan
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge; Addenbrooke's Hospital, UK
| | - Mei Yin Wong
- School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, UK
| | | | - Lydia Dean
- School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, UK
| | - Joe Magee
- School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, UK
| | | | - Yuri Hirayama
- School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, UK
| | - Martina Rihova
- School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, UK
| | | | - Max Stewart
- School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, UK
| | - Beth Goulson
- School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, UK
| | - Shahzaib Ahmed
- School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, UK
| | - Kai Fricke
- School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, UK
| | | | - Zack Millar
- School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Toto Gronlund
- National Institute for Health Research, University of Southampton, UK
| | - Lindsay Tetreault
- Langone Health, Graduate Medical Education, Department of Neurology, New York University, New York, NY, USA
| | - James S. Harrop
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Bizhan Aarabi
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Vafa Rahimi-Movaghar
- Department of Neurosurgery, Sina Trauma and Surgery Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Shekar N Kurpad
- Department of Neurosurgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Wauwatosa, WI, United States
| | - James D. Guest
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Miami, Miami, FL, United States
| | - Jefferson R. Wilson
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - Brian K. Kwon
- Vancouver Spine Surgery Institute, Department of Orthopedics, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Michael G. Fehlings
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Canada
| | | | - Benjamin M. Davies
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge; Addenbrooke's Hospital, UK
| | - Mark R.N. Kotter
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge; Addenbrooke's Hospital, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Davies BM, Mowforth O, Wood H, Karimi Z, Sadler I, Tetreault L, Milligan J, Wilson JRF, Kalsi-Ryan S, Furlan JC, Kawaguchi Y, Ito M, Zipser CM, Boerger TF, Vaccaro AR, Murphy RKJ, Hutton M, Rodrigues-Pinto R, Koljonen PA, Harrop JS, Aarabi B, Rahimi-Movaghar V, Kurpad SN, Guest JD, Wilson JR, Kwon BK, Kotter MRN, Fehlings MG. Improving Awareness Could Transform Outcomes in Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy [AO Spine RECODE-DCM Research Priority Number 1]. Global Spine J 2022; 12:28S-38S. [PMID: 35174734 PMCID: PMC8859708 DOI: 10.1177/21925682211050927] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Literature Review (Narrative). OBJECTIVE To introduce the number one research priority for Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy (DCM): Raising Awareness. METHODS Raising awareness has been recognized by AO Spine RECODE-DCM as the number one research priority. This article reviews the evidence that awareness is low, the potential drivers, and why this must be addressed. Case studies of success from other diseases are also reviewed, drawing potential parallels and opportunities for DCM. RESULTS DCM may affect as many as 1 in 50 adults, yet few will receive a diagnosis and those that do will wait many years for it. This leads to poorer outcomes from surgery and greater disability. DCM is rarely featured in healthcare professional training programs and has received relatively little research funding (<2% of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis or Multiple Sclerosis over the last 25 years). The transformation of stroke and acute coronary syndrome services, from a position of best supportive care with occasional surgery over 50 years ago, to avoidable disability today, represents transferable examples of success and potential opportunities for DCM. Central to this is raising awareness. CONCLUSION Despite the devastating burden on the patient, recognition across research, clinical practice, and healthcare policy are limited. DCM represents a significant unmet need that must become an international public health priority.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benjamin M. Davies
- Myelopathy.org, International Charity for Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy, Cambridge, UK
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Oliver Mowforth
- Myelopathy.org, International Charity for Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy, Cambridge, UK
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Helen Wood
- Myelopathy.org, International Charity for Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy, Cambridge, UK
| | - Zahabiya Karimi
- Myelopathy.org, International Charity for Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy, Cambridge, UK
| | - Iwan Sadler
- Myelopathy.org, International Charity for Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy, Cambridge, UK
| | - Lindsay Tetreault
- Department of Neurology, Langone Health, Graduate Medical Education, New York University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jamie Milligan
- Department of Family Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Jamie R. F. Wilson
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA
| | - Sukhvinder Kalsi-Ryan
- KITE Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Medicine, Division of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Julio C. Furlan
- KITE Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Medicine, Division of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | | - Manabu Ito
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, National Hospital Organization Hokkaido Medical Center, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Carl Moritz Zipser
- University Spine Center, Balgrist University Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Timothy F Boerger
- Department of Neurosurgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Wauwatosa, WI, USA
| | - Alexander R. Vaccaro
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rothman Orthopaedic Institute, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Rory K. J. Murphy
- Department of Neurosurgery, St. Joseph’s Hospital and Medical Center, Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Mike Hutton
- Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Foundation Trust, Exeter, UK
| | - Ricardo Rodrigues-Pinto
- Department of Orthopaedics, Spinal Unit (UVM), Centro Hospitalar Universitário Do Porto - Hospital de Santo António, Porto, Portugal
- Instituto de Ciências Biomédicas Abel Salazar, Porto, Portugal
| | - Paul A. Koljonen
- Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - James S. Harrop
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Bizhan Aarabi
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Vafa Rahimi-Movaghar
- Department of Neurosurgery, Sina Trauma and Surgery Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Shekar N Kurpad
- Department of Neurosurgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Wauwatosa, WI, USA
| | - James D. Guest
- Department of Neurosurgery and The Miami Project to Cure Paralysis, The Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Jefferson R. Wilson
- Department of Surgery, Division of Neurosurgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Brian K. Kwon
- Department of Orthopedics, Vancouver Spine Surgery Institute, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Mark R. N. Kotter
- Myelopathy.org, International Charity for Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy, Cambridge, UK
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Michael G. Fehlings
- Department of Surgery, Division of Neurosurgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Tetreault L, Garwood P, Gharooni AA, Touzet AY, Nanna-Lohkamp L, Martin A, Wilson J, Harrop JS, Guest J, Kwon BK, Milligan J, Arizala AM, Riew KD, Fehlings MG, Kotter MRN, Kalsi-Ryan S, Davies BM. Improving Assessment of Disease Severity and Strategies for Monitoring Progression in Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy [AO Spine RECODE-DCM Research Priority Number 4]. Global Spine J 2022; 12:64S-77S. [PMID: 34971524 PMCID: PMC8859700 DOI: 10.1177/21925682211063854] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Narrative Review. OBJECTIVE To (i) discuss why assessment and monitoring of disease progression is critical in Degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM); (ii) outline the important features of an ideal assessment tool and (iii) discuss current and novel strategies for detecting subtle deterioration in DCM. METHODS Literature review. RESULTS Degenerative cervical myelopathy is an overarching term used to describe progressive injury to the cervical spinal cord by age-related changes of the spinal axis. Based on a study by Smith et al (2020), the prevalence of DCM is approximately 2.3% and is expected to rise as the global population ages. Given the global impact of this disease, it is essential to address important knowledge gaps and prioritize areas for future investigation. As part of the AO Spine RECODE-DCM (Research Objectives and Common Data Elements for Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy) project, a priority setting partnership was initiated to increase research efficiency by identifying the top ten research priorities for DCM. One of the top ten priorities for future DCM research was: What assessment tools can be used to evaluate functional impairment, disability and quality of life in people with DCM? What instruments, tools or methods can be used or developed to monitor people with DCM for disease progression or improvement either before or after surgical treatment? CONCLUSIONS With the increasing prevalence of DCM, effective surveillance of this population will require both the implementation of a monitoring framework as well as the development of new assessment tools.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lindsay Tetreault
- Department of Neurology, Langone Health, Graduate Medical Education, New York University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Philip Garwood
- Graduate Medical Education, Internal Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Aref-Ali Gharooni
- Neurosurgery Unit, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | | | - Laura Nanna-Lohkamp
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Allan Martin
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of California Davis, Sacramento, CA, USA
| | - Jefferson Wilson
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - James S. Harrop
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - James Guest
- Department of Neurosurgery and The Miami Project to Cure Paralysis, The Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Brian K. Kwon
- Vancouver Spine Surgery Institute, Department of Orthopedics, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - James Milligan
- McMaster University Department of Family Medicine, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Alberto Martinez Arizala
- The Miami Project to Cure Paralysis, The Miller School of Medicine University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA
| | - K. Daniel Riew
- Department of Orthopaedics, The Och Spine Hospital at New York-Presbyterian, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Michael G. Fehlings
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | | - Sukhvinder Kalsi-Ryan
- KITE Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Medicine, Division of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Davies BM, Mowforth O, Gharooni AA, Tetreault L, Nouri A, Dhillon RS, Bednarik J, Martin AR, Young A, Takahashi H, Boerger TF, Newcombe VFJ, Zipser CM, Freund P, Koljonen PA, Rodrigues-Pinto R, Rahimi-Movaghar V, Wilson JR, Kurpad SN, Fehlings MG, Kwon BK, Harrop JS, Guest JD, Curt A, Kotter MRN. A New Framework for Investigating the Biological Basis of Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy [AO Spine RECODE-DCM Research Priority Number 5]: Mechanical Stress, Vulnerability and Time. Global Spine J 2022; 12:78S-96S. [PMID: 35174728 PMCID: PMC8859710 DOI: 10.1177/21925682211057546] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Literature Review (Narrative). OBJECTIVE To propose a new framework, to support the investigation and understanding of the pathobiology of DCM, AO Spine RECODE-DCM research priority number 5. METHODS Degenerative cervical myelopathy is a common and disabling spinal cord disorder. In this perspective, we review key knowledge gaps between the clinical phenotype and our biological models. We then propose a reappraisal of the key driving forces behind DCM and an individual's susceptibility, including the proposal of a new framework. RESULTS Present pathobiological and mechanistic knowledge does not adequately explain the disease phenotype; why only a subset of patients with visualized cord compression show clinical myelopathy, and the amount of cord compression only weakly correlates with disability. We propose that DCM is better represented as a function of several interacting mechanical forces, such as shear, tension and compression, alongside an individual's vulnerability to spinal cord injury, influenced by factors such as age, genetics, their cardiovascular, gastrointestinal and nervous system status, and time. CONCLUSION Understanding the disease pathobiology is a fundamental research priority. We believe a framework of mechanical stress, vulnerability, and time may better represent the disease as a whole. Whilst this remains theoretical, we hope that at the very least it will inspire new avenues of research that better encapsulate the full spectrum of disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Oliver Mowforth
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | | | - Lindsay Tetreault
- New York University, Langone Health, Graduate Medical Education, Department of Neurology, New York, NY, USA
| | - Aria Nouri
- Division of Neurosurgery, Geneva University Hospitals, University of Geneva, Genève, Switzerland
| | - Rana S. Dhillon
- Department of Neurosurgery, St Vincent’s Hospital Melbourne, Fitzroy, VIC, Australia
| | - Josef Bednarik
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Brno and Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Allan R. Martin
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of California Davis, Sacramento, CA, USA
| | - Adam Young
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Hitoshi Takahashi
- Department of Pathology, Brain Research Institute, Niigata University, Niigata, Japan
| | - Timothy F. Boerger
- Department of Neurosurgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Wauwatosa, WI, USA
| | - Virginia FJ Newcombe
- Division of Anaesthesia, Department of Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Carl Moritz Zipser
- University Spine Center, Balgrist University Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Patrick Freund
- University Spine Center, Balgrist University Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Paul Aarne Koljonen
- Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Ricardo Rodrigues-Pinto
- Spinal Unit (UVM), Department of Orthopaedics, Centro Hospitalar Universitário do Porto - Hospital de Santo António, Porto, Portugal
- Instituto de Ciências Biomédicas Abel Salazar, Porto, Portugal
| | - Vafa Rahimi-Movaghar
- Department of Neurosurgery, Sina Trauma and Surgery Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Jefferson R. Wilson
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Shekar N Kurpad
- Department of Neurosurgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Wauwatosa, WI, USA
| | - Michael G. Fehlings
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Brian K. Kwon
- Vancouver Spine Surgery Institute, Department of Orthopedics, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - James S. Harrop
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - James D. Guest
- Department of Neurosurgery and the Miami Project to Cure Paralysis, The Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Armin Curt
- University Spine Center, Balgrist University Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland
| | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Tetreault L, Mowforth O, Khan DZ, Gronlund T, Garwood P, Hazenbiller O, Harrop JS, Aarabi B, Rahimi-Movaghar V, Kurpad SN, Guest JD, Wilson JR, Kwon BK, Fehlings MG, Davies BM, Kotter MRN. James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnership for Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy [AO Spine RECODE-DCM]: An Overview of the Methodology Used to Process and Short-List Research Uncertainties. Global Spine J 2022; 12:19S-27S. [PMID: 35174731 PMCID: PMC8859709 DOI: 10.1177/21925682211062501] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Overview of the methods used for a James Lind Alliance (JLA) Priority Setting Partnership (PSP). OBJECTIVES The objectives of this article are to (i) provide a brief overview of the JLA-facilitated PSP process; (ii) outline how research uncertainties were initially processed in the AO Spine RECODE-DCM PSP; and (iii) delineate the methods for interim prioritization and the priority setting workshop. METHODS A steering group was created to define the scope for the PSP, organize its activities, and establish protocols for decision-making. A survey was created asking what questions on the diagnosis, treatment, and long-term management of DCM should be answered by future research. Results from the survey were sorted into summary questions. Several databases were searched to identify literature that already answered these summary questions. The final list of summary questions was distributed by survey for interim prioritization. Participants were asked to select the top ten most important summary questions. The questions that were ranked the highest were discussed at an in-person consensus workshop. RESULTS The initial survey yielded a total of 3404 potential research questions. Of the in-scope submissions, 988 were related to diagnosis, 1324 to treatment, and 615 to long-term management of DCM. A total of 76 summary questions were developed to reflect the original submissions. Following a second survey, a list of the top 26 interim priorities was generated and discussed at the in-person priority setting workshop. CONCLUSIONS PSPs enable research priorities to be identified that consider the perspectives and interests of all relevant stakeholders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lindsay Tetreault
- Langone Health, Graduate Medical Education, Department of Neurology, New York University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Oliver Mowforth
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Danyal Z. Khan
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | | | - Philip Garwood
- Graduate Medical Education, Internal Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | | - James S. Harrop
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Bizhan Aarabi
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Vafa Rahimi-Movaghar
- Department of Neurosurgery, Sina Trauma and Surgery Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Shekar N. Kurpad
- Department of Neurosurgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Wauwatosa, WI, USA
| | - James D. Guest
- Department of Neurosurgery and the Miami Project to Cure Paralysis, the Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Jefferson R. Wilson
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Brian K. Kwon
- Vancouver Spine Surgery Institute, Department of Orthopedics, the University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Michael G. Fehlings
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Benjamin M. Davies
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
- Vancouver Spine Surgery Institute, Department of Orthopedics, the University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Mark R. N. Kotter
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
- Vancouver Spine Surgery Institute, Department of Orthopedics, the University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Hilton B, Gardner EL, Jiang Z, Tetreault L, Wilson JRF, Zipser CM, Riew KD, Guest JD, Harrop JS, Fehlings MG, Rodrigues-Pinto R, Rahimi-Movaghar V, Aarabi B, Koljonen PA, Kotter MRN, Davies BM, Kwon BK. Establishing Diagnostic Criteria for Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy [AO Spine RECODE-DCM Research Priority Number 3]. Global Spine J 2022; 12:55S-63S. [PMID: 35174729 PMCID: PMC8859706 DOI: 10.1177/21925682211030871] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Narrative review. OBJECTIVES To discuss the importance of establishing diagnostic criteria in Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy (DCM), including factors that must be taken into account and challenges that must be overcome in this process. METHODS Literature review summarising current evidence of establishing diagnostic criteria for DCM. RESULTS Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy (DCM) is characterised by a degenerative process of the cervical spine resulting in chronic spinal cord dysfunction and subsequent neurological disability. Diagnostic delays lead to progressive neurological decline with associated reduction in quality of life for patients. Surgical decompression may halt neurologic worsening and, in many cases, improves function. Therefore, making a prompt diagnosis of DCM in order to facilitate early surgical intervention is a clinical priority in DCM. CONCLUSION There are often extensive delays in the diagnosis of DCM. Presently, no single set of diagnostic criteria exists for DCM, making it challenging for clinicians to make the diagnosis. Earlier diagnosis and subsequent specialist referral could lead to improved patient outcomes using existing treatment modalities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bryn Hilton
- Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Emma L. Gardner
- Colchester Hospital, East Suffolk and North Essex NHS Foundation Trust, Colchester, United Kingdom
| | - Zhilin Jiang
- Kings College Hospital, Kings College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Lindsay Tetreault
- Langone Health, Graduate Medical Education, Department of Neurology, New York University, NY, USA
| | - Jamie R. F. Wilson
- University of Nebraska Medical Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Omaha, Nebraska, USA
| | - Carl Moritz Zipser
- University Spine Center, Balgrist University Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - K. Daniel Riew
- Department of Orthopaedics, Columbia University Medical Center, The Och Spine Hospital at New York-Presbyterian, NY, USA
| | - James D. Guest
- Department of Neurosurgery and The Miami Project to Cure Paralysis, The Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA
| | - James S. Harrop
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Michael G. Fehlings
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Ricardo Rodrigues-Pinto
- Department of Orthopaedics, Spinal Unit (UVM), Centro Hospitalar Universitário do Porto - Hospital de Santo António, Porto, Portugal
- Department of Orthopaedics, Instituto de CiM), Centro Hospital, Portugal
| | - Vafa Rahimi-Movaghar
- Department of Neurosurgery, Sina Trauma and Surgery Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Bizhan Aarabi
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Paul A. Koljonen
- Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Mark R. N. Kotter
- Myelopathy.org, International Charity for Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy, United Kingdom
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Benjamin M. Davies
- Myelopathy.org, International Charity for Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy, United Kingdom
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Brian K. Kwon
- Department of Orthopaedics, University of British Columbia, Blusson Spinal Cord Center, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Yanez Touzet A, Bhatti A, Dohle E, Bhatti F, Lee KS, Furlan JC, Fehlings MG, Harrop JS, Zipser CM, Rodrigues-Pinto R, Milligan J, Sarewitz E, Curt A, Rahimi-Movaghar V, Aarabi B, Boerger TF, Tetreault L, Chen R, Guest JD, Kalsi-Ryan S, McNair AG, Kotter M, Davies B. Clinical outcome measures and their evidence base in degenerative cervical myelopathy: a systematic review to inform a core measurement set (AO Spine RECODE-DCM). BMJ Open 2022; 12:e057650. [PMID: 35046007 PMCID: PMC8772430 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-057650] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2021] [Accepted: 12/22/2021] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To evaluate the measurement properties of outcome measures currently used in the assessment of degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) for clinical research. DESIGN Systematic review DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched through 4 August 2020. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA Primary clinical research published in English and whose primary purpose was to evaluate the measurement properties or clinically important differences of instruments used in DCM. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS Psychometric properties and clinically important differences were both extracted from each study, assessed for risk of bias and presented in accordance with the Consensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement Instruments criteria. RESULTS Twenty-nine outcome instruments were identified from 52 studies published between 1999 and 2020. They measured neuromuscular function (16 instruments), life impact (five instruments), pain (five instruments) and radiological scoring (five instruments). No instrument had evaluations for all 10 measurement properties and <50% had assessments for all three domains (ie, reliability, validity and responsiveness). There was a paucity of high-quality evidence. Notably, there were no studies that reported on structural validity and no high-quality evidence that discussed content validity. In this context, we identified nine instruments that are interpretable by clinicians: the arm and neck pain scores; the 12-item and 36-item short form health surveys; the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, modified JOA and JOA Cervical Myelopathy Evaluation Questionnaire; the neck disability index; and the visual analogue scale for pain. These include six scores with barriers to application and one score with insufficient criterion and construct validity. CONCLUSIONS This review aggregates studies evaluating outcome measures used to assess patients with DCM. Overall, there is a need for a set of agreed tools to measure outcomes in DCM. These findings will be used to inform the development of a core measurement set as part of AO Spine RECODE-DCM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alvaro Yanez Touzet
- School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Aniqah Bhatti
- School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Esmee Dohle
- School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Faheem Bhatti
- School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Keng Siang Lee
- Bristol Medical School, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Julio C Furlan
- Department of Medicine, Division of Physical Medicine and Rehabilita, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Division of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- KITE Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Michael G Fehlings
- Division of Neurosurgery and Spinal Program, Toronto Western Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - James S Harrop
- Thomas Jefferson University, Jefferson Health System, St Louis, Philadelphia, USA
| | - Carl Moritz Zipser
- Spinal Cord Injury Center, Balgrist University Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Ricardo Rodrigues-Pinto
- Spinal Unit (UVM), Department of Orthopaedics, Centro Hospitalar Universitário do Porto, Porto, Portugal
- Instituto de Ciências Biomédicas Abel Salazar, Porto, Portugal
| | - James Milligan
- Department of Family Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Armin Curt
- Spinal Cord Injury Center, Balgrist University Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Vafa Rahimi-Movaghar
- Academic Department of Neurological Surgery, Sina Trauma and Surgery Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Tehran, Iran
| | - Bizhan Aarabi
- Division of Neurosurgery, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Timothy F Boerger
- Department of Neurosurgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Lindsay Tetreault
- Toronto Western Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Robert Chen
- Toronto Western Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Krembil Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - James D Guest
- Department of Neurological Surgery and The Miami Project to Cure Paralysis, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA
| | | | - Angus Gk McNair
- Centre for Surgical Research, Bristol Medical School: Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, Avon, UK
- GI Surgery, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, UK
| | - Mark Kotter
- Department of Clinical Neurosurgery, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Ann McLaren Laboratory of Regenerative Medicine, Cambridge, UK
| | - Benjamin Davies
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Davies BM, Mowforth OD, Khan DZ, Yang X, Stacpoole SRL, Hazenbiller O, Gronlund T, Tetreault L, Kalsi-Ryan S, Starkey ML, Sadler I, Sarewitz E, Houlton D, Carter J, Howard E, Rahimi-Movaghar V, Guest JD, Aarabi B, Kwon BK, Kurpad SN, Harrop J, Wilson JR, Grossman R, Smith EK, McNair AGK, Fehlings MG, Kotter MRN. The development of lived experience-centered word clouds to support research uncertainty gathering in degenerative cervical myelopathy: results from an engagement process and protocol for their evaluation, via a nested randomized controlled trial. Trials 2021; 22:415. [PMID: 34172080 PMCID: PMC8235822 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-021-05349-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2020] [Accepted: 06/01/2021] [Indexed: 01/17/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES AO Spine REsearch objectives and Common Data Elements for Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy [RECODE-DCM] is a multi-stakeholder consensus process aiming to promote research efficiency in DCM. It aims to establish the top 10 research uncertainties, through a James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnership [PSP]. Through a consensus process, research questions are generated and ranked. The inclusion of people with cervical myelopathy [PwCM] is central to the process. We hypothesized that presenting PwCM experience through word cloud generation would stimulate other key stakeholders to generate research questions better aligned with PwCM needs. This protocol outlines our plans to evaluate this as a nested methodological study within our PSP. METHODS An online poll asked PwCM to submit and vote on words associated with aspects of DCM. After review, a refined word list was re-polled for voting and word submission. Word clouds were generated and an implementation plan for AO Spine RECODE-DCM PSP surveys was subsequently developed. RESULTS Seventy-nine terms were submitted after the first poll. Eighty-seven refined words were then re-polled (which added a further 39 words). Four word clouds were generated under the categories of diagnosis, management, long-term effects, and other. A 1:1 block randomization protocol to assess word cloud impact on the number and relevance of PSP research questions was generated. CONCLUSIONS We have shown it is feasible to work with PwCM to generate a tool for the AO Spine RECODE-DCM nested methodological study. Once the survey stage is completed, we will be able to evaluate the impact of the word clouds. Further research will be needed to assess the value of any impact in terms of stimulating a more creative research agenda.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benjamin M Davies
- Academic Neurosurgery Unit & Anne McLaren Laboratory of Regenerative Medicine, Department of Clinical Neurosurgery, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Oliver D Mowforth
- Academic Neurosurgery Unit & Anne McLaren Laboratory of Regenerative Medicine, Department of Clinical Neurosurgery, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Danyal Z Khan
- Academic Neurosurgery Unit & Anne McLaren Laboratory of Regenerative Medicine, Department of Clinical Neurosurgery, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Xiaoyu Yang
- Academic Neurosurgery Unit & Anne McLaren Laboratory of Regenerative Medicine, Department of Clinical Neurosurgery, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Sybil R L Stacpoole
- Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Peterborough Hospital, North West Anglia NHS Foundation Trust and Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| | | | - Toto Gronlund
- James Lind Alliance, National Institute for Health Research, Southampton, UK
| | - Lindsay Tetreault
- Division of Neurosurgery, Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Sukhvinder Kalsi-Ryan
- Toronto Rehabilitation Institute-LC, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Michelle L Starkey
- Academic Neurosurgery Unit & Anne McLaren Laboratory of Regenerative Medicine, Department of Clinical Neurosurgery, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Iwan Sadler
- Myelopathy.org (Registered Charity England and Wales, No 1178673), Cambridge, UK
| | - Ellen Sarewitz
- The Goffin Consultancy, Goffin Consultancy Ltd, Riding House, Bossingham Road, Stelling Minnis, Canterbury, CT4 6AZ, UK
| | - Delphine Houlton
- Myelopathy.org (Registered Charity England and Wales, No 1178673), Cambridge, UK
| | - Julia Carter
- Myelopathy.org (Registered Charity England and Wales, No 1178673), Cambridge, UK
| | | | - Vafa Rahimi-Movaghar
- Academic Department of Neurological Surgery, Sina Trauma and Surgery Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - James D Guest
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Bizhan Aarabi
- Division of Neurosurgery, Shock Trauma, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Brian K Kwon
- Division of Spine Surgery, Vancouver General Hospital, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Shekar N Kurpad
- Department of Neurosurgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA
| | - James Harrop
- Division of Neurosurgery, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Jefferson R Wilson
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Robert Grossman
- Division of Neurosurgery, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Emma K Smith
- School of General Practice, NHS Health Education East of England, Cambridge, UK
| | - Angus G K McNair
- Center for Surgical Research, Bristol Medical School: Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Michael G Fehlings
- Division of Neurosurgery, Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Mark R N Kotter
- Academic Neurosurgery Unit & Anne McLaren Laboratory of Regenerative Medicine, Department of Clinical Neurosurgery, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK. .,Wellcome Trust & MRC Cambridge Stem Cell Institute, Cambridge, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Kalsi-Ryan S, Riehm LE, Tetreault L, Martin AR, Teoderascu F, Massicotte E, Curt A, Verrier MC, Velstra IM, Fehlings MG. Characteristics of Upper Limb Impairment Related to Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy: Development of a Sensitive Hand Assessment (Graded Redefined Assessment of Strength, Sensibility, and Prehension Version Myelopathy). Neurosurgery 2020; 86:E292-E299. [PMID: 31792501 PMCID: PMC7018615 DOI: 10.1093/neuros/nyz499] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2019] [Accepted: 09/04/2019] [Indexed: 12/01/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) involves spinal cord compression, which causes neurological decline. Neurological impairment in DCM is variable and can involve complex upper limb dysfunction including loss of manual dexterity, hyperreflexia, focal weakness, and sensory impairment. The modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association (mJOA) score relies on the patients’ subjective perceptions, whereas existing objective measures such as strength and sensory testing do not capture subtle changes in dexterity and function. OBJECTIVE 1) To characterize arm and hand function in DCM; and 2) To develop and validate Graded Redefined Assessment of Strength, Sensibility, and Prehension Version-Myelopathy (GRASSP-M), a clinical assessment that quantifies upper limb impairment. METHODS A total of 148 DCM patients (categorized into mild, moderate, and severe based on mJOA grade) and 21 healthy subjects were enrolled. A complete neurological exam, the mJOA, the QuickDASH, grip dynamometry, and the GRASSP-M were administered. RESULTS Strength, sensation, and manual dexterity significantly declined with increasing DCM severity (P ≤ .05). Impairment in hand dexterity showed better discrimination between mild, moderate, and severe DCM categories than strength or sensation. The GRASSP-M was found to be both a reliable (intraclass correlation coefficient >0.75 for intra- and inter-rater reliability) and valid (with both concurrent and construct validity) tool. CONCLUSION These results demonstrate that patients’ subjective reporting of functional status, especially in the mild DCM category, may underrepresent the extent of functional impairment. The GRASSP-M is an objective tool designed to characterize patients’ functional impairment related to the upper limb, which proves useful to diagnose and quantify mild dysfunction, monitor patients for deterioration, and help determine when patients should be treated surgically.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sukhvinder Kalsi-Ryan
- Department of Physical Therapy, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada.,KITE-UHN, Toronto Rehab Institute, Department of Physical Therapy, University of Toronto
| | - Lauren E Riehm
- Division of Neurosurgery, Spinal Program, Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
| | | | - Allan R Martin
- Division of Neurosurgery, Spinal Program, Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada.,Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Florentina Teoderascu
- Division of Neurosurgery, Spinal Program, Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
| | - Eric Massicotte
- Division of Neurosurgery, Spinal Program, Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada.,Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Armin Curt
- University Hospital, Balgrist, Zurich Switzerland
| | | | | | - Michael G Fehlings
- Department of Physical Therapy, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada.,Division of Neurosurgery, Spinal Program, Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada.,Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Missiuna P, Shen J, Nahle I, Shen J, Alanazi M, Rutges J, Rocos B, Miyanji F, Lohkamp L, Grootjen L, Hachem L, Aldebeyan S, Machida M, Padhye K, Rushton P, Jentzsch T, Jentzsch T, Lewis S, Passias P, Pierce K, Lewis S, Passias P, Nielsen C, Glennie A, Crawford E, Schneider N, Ayling O, Christie S, Greene R, Singh S, Beauchamp-Chalifour P, Balasuberamaniam P, Singh S, Mercure-Cyr R, Wilson J, Evaniew N, Martin A, Rienmueller A, Martin A, Karim M, Martin A, Cheung A, Badhiwala J, Diotalevi L, Jaja B, Fallah N, Badhiwala J, Wasim A, Manson N, Lasry O, Crawford E, Brown A, MacLean MA, Khan O, Badhiwala J, Odai KG, Bailly N, Khan O, Evaniew N, Yamamoto S, Singh M, Kashigar A, Persad A, Fernandes RJR, Malakoutian M, Ahuja C, Morris S, Stukas S, Chen T, Babadagli E, Xu M, Nater A, Oitment C, Karim M, Aziz M, Pahuta M, Versteeg A, Sundararajan K, Tanguay R, Stratton A, Cushnie D, Correale M, Sadiq I, Badhiwala J, Passias P, Badhiwala J, McGregor S, Passias P, Badhiwala J, Chen T, Singh S, Ayling O, Bond M, Rienmueller A, Chen T, Lasry O, Lyons F, Ahmed U, Inglis T, Waheed Z, Wilson J, Nater A, Pahuta M, Klein G, McKibben N, Kassam F, Clement A, Kanawati A, Shaikh N, Kanawati A, Alshammari A, Kanawati A, Yamamoto S, Hamilton K, Huschi Z, Peng YN, Huschi Z, Filgueira É, Goulet J, Kashigar A, Chen T, Hadgaonkar S, MacLean M, Chen T, Kerr HL, Meagher J, Wilson J, Stevens M, Rocos B, Pai A, Kingwell S, Thibault J, Touchette C, Moskven E, Greene R, DeVries Z, Sarraj M, Bosakhar B, Thornley P, Donnellan J, Kishta W, Darby P, Nahle I, Alzakri A, Roy-Beaudry M, Joncas J, Turgeon I, Parent S, Shen J, Alzakri A, Roy-Beaudry M, Joncas J, Turgeon I, Parent S, Samson N, Lamontagne-Proulx J, Soulet D, Tremblay Y, Praud JP, Parent S, Parent S, Gross D, Renkens J, Schlösser T, Stadhouder A, Kruyt M, Mostert A, Tee J, de Klerk L, De Kleuver M, Castelein R, Zeller R, Lewis S, Tan T, Lebel D, Rushton P, Petcharaporn M, Samdani A, Newton P, Marks M, Drake J, Dirks P, Rutka J, Kulkarni A, Ibrahim G, Taylor M, Dewan M, Zeller R, Donze S, Damen L, Rutges J, Hokken-Koelega A, Mathieu F, Lamberti-Pasculi M, Hanak B, Zeller R, Kulkarni A, Drake J, Ibrahim G, Rushton P, Ghag R, Miyanji F, Zeller R, Lewis S, Lebel D, Peiro-Garcia A, Benavides B, Parsons D, Ferri-de-Barros F, Aldebeyan S, Ghag R, Miyanji F, Kutschke L, Laux C, Kabelitz M, Schüpbach R, Böni T, Farshad M, Nielsen C, Lewis S, Lenke L, Shaffrey C, Cheung K, Berven S, Qiu Y, Matsuyama Y, Pellisé-Urquiza F, Polly D, Sembrano J, Dahl B, Kelly M, de Kleuver M, Spruit M, Alanay A, Alas H, Kim HJ, Lafage R, Soroceanu A, Hockley A, Ames C, Klineberg E, Burton D, Diebo B, Bess S, Line B, Shaffrey C, Smith J, Schwab F, Lafage V, Passias P, Lafage R, Soroceanu A, Hockley A, Line B, Klineberg E, Bess S, Protopsaltis T, Shaffrey C, Schwab F, Scheer J, Smith J, Lafage V, Ames C, Lenke L, Shaffrey C, Cheung K, Berven S, Qiu Y, Matsuyama Y, Pellisé-Urquiza F, Polly D, Sembrano J, Dahl B, Kelly M, de Kleuver M, Spruit M, Alanay A, Bortz C, Pierce K, Alas H, Brown A, Soroceanu A, Hockley A, Vira S, Ahmad W, Naessig S, Diebo B, Raman T, Protopsaltis T, Buckland A, Gerling M, Lafage R, Lafage V, Lewis S, Lenke L, Shaffrey C, Cheung K, Berven S, Qiu Y, Matsuyama Y, Pellisé-Urquiza F, Polly D, Sembrano J, Dahl B, Kelly M, de Kleuver M, Spruit M, Alanay A, Bailey C, Rampersaud R, Fisher C, Chen T, McIntosh G, Rampersaud R, Karim M, Urquhart J, Fisher C, Street J, Dvorak M, Paquette S, Charest-Morin R, Ailon T, Glennie A, Manson N, Rampersaud R, Thomas K, Rasoulinejad P, Bailey C, Ailon T, Fisher C, Greene R, Glennie A, Duquette D, LeBlanc D, Martell B, Schmidt M, Christie S, Wong DBT, Di Paola C, Ailon T, Charest-Morin R, Dea N, Dvorak M, Fisher C, Kwon B, Paquette S, Street J, Street J, Flexman A, Charest-Morin R, Wasim A, Schwartz C, Stark R, Shrikumar M, Finkelstein J, Gara A, Banaszek D, Wong T, Ailon T, Bryce E, Charest-Morin R, Dea N, Dvorak M, Fisher C, Kwon B, Paquette S, Street J, Persad A, Spiess M, Wu A, Woo A, Hnenny L, Fourney D, Joshi H, Khan O, Badhiwala J, Rampersaud R, Lewis S, Massicotte E, Fehlings M, Cadotte D, Bailey C, Christie S, Dea N, Fisher C, Paquet J, Soroceanu A, Thomas KC, Rampersaud YR, Wilson J, Manson N, Johnson M, Hall H, McIntosh G, Jacobs B, Kalsi-Ryan S, Akbar MA, Badhiwala J, Wilson J, Tetreault L, Nouri A, Rienmuller A, Massicotte E, Fehlings M, Kalsi-Ryan S, Riehm L, Martin A, Badhiwala J, Akbar M, Massicotte E, Fehlings M, Kalsi-Ryan S, Akbar MA, Badhiwala J, Wilson J, Tetreault L, Nouri A, Rienmuller A, Massicotte E, Fehlings M, Jacobs B, Johnson M, Bailey C, Christie S, Paquet J, Nataraj A, Cadotte D, Wilson J, Manson N, Hall H, Thomas K, Rampersaud R, McIntosh G, Fisher C, Dea N, Wilson J, Jentzsch T, Jiang F, Badhiwala J, Moghaddamjou A, Akbar MA, Nater A, Rienmuller A, Ganau M, Massicotte E, Fehlings M, Tu L, Manouchehri N, Kim KT, So K, Webster M, Fisk S, Tigchelaar S, Dalkilic S, Sayre E, Streijger F, Macnab A, Kwon B, Shadgan B, Wilson J, Fehlings M, Bailly N, Wagnac E, Mac-Thiong JM, Goulet J, Petit Y, Badhiwala J, Grossman R, Geisler F, Fehlings M, Wilson J, Rivers C, Kwon B, Waheed Z, Buenaventura J, Humphreys S, Noonan V, Evaniew N, Dvorak M, Wilson J, Fehlings M, Shrikumar M, Balasuberamaniam P, Rapkin B, Schwartz C, Stark R, Finkelstein J, Bigney E, Darling M, Richardson E, El-Mughayyar D, Abraham E, Street J, Radomski L, Rampersaud R, Pierce K, Bortz C, Alas H, Naessig S, Ahmad W, Vira S, Diebo B, Sciubba D, Hassanzadeh H, Hockley A, Soroceanu A, Protopsaltis T, Buckland A, Passias P, Greene R, Christie SD, Badhiwala J, Fehlings M, Witiw C, Wilson J, Fehlings M, Nessek H, Wai E, Phan P, Diotalevi L, Beauséjour MH, Wagnac E, Mac-Thiong JM, Petit Y, Badhiwala J, Fehlings M, Mazlouman S, Belley-Côté E, Jacobs B, Kwon B, Malakoutian M, Theret M, Street J, Brown S, Rossi F, Oxland T, Singh P, Chandra S, Laratta J, Carreon L, Bisson E, Ghogawala Z, Yew A, Mkorombindo T, Mummaneni P, Glassman S, Kindrachuk M, Hnenny L, Wu A, Norton J, Fourney D, Gee A, Kerr HL, Kanawati A, Zdero R, Gurr K, Bailey C, Rasoulinejad P, Yamamoto S, Sadaram S, Speidel J, Liu J, Street J, Brown S, Oxland T, Khazaei M, Walji I, Dadabhoy M, Gulati N, Aiyar N, Ostmeier S, Hasan A, Senthilnathan V, Punjani N, Yao Y, Yue S, Ozdemir G, Lou Z, Luong W, Post A, Tootsi A, Chan P, Fehlings M, Yung A, George S, Prevost V, Bauman A, Kozlowski P, Samadi F, Fournier C, Parker L, Dong K, Streijger F, Moore W, Laule C, Kwon B, Gill J, Cooper J, Dong K, Streijger F, Street J, Paquette S, Ailon T, Charest-Morin R, Fisher C, Dvorak M, Dhall S, Mac-Thiong JM, Parent S, Bailey C, Christie S, Wellington C, Kwon B, Crawford E, Zhang Y, Hardisty M, Finkelstein J, Kureshi N, Julien L, Abidi R, Christie S, Parashin S, Gascoyne T, Goytan M, Chuang J, Liu K, Quraishi N, Pasku D, Wilson J, Fehlings M, Bozzo A, Reinmuller A, Martin A, Hananel SY, Thornley P, Gazendam A, Aoude A, Nielsen C, Rampersaud R, Dea N, Versteeg A, Sahgal A, Verlaan JJ, Morin RC, Rhines L, Sciubba D, Schuster J, Weber M, Lazary A, Fehlings M, Clarke M, Arnold P, Boriani S, Laufer I, Gokaslan Z, Fisher C, Rosenzweig D, Weber M, Fisk F, Versteeg A, Fisher C, Sahgal A, Gokaslan Z, Rhines L, Boriani S, Bettegowda C, Dea N, Gal R, Charest-Morin R, Verlaan JJ, Verkooijen L, Fisher C, Perruccio A, Rampersaud R, Eckenswiller D, Yu A, Klassen K, Lewkonia P, Thomas K, Jacobs B, Miller N, Swamy G, Yang M, Soroceanu A, Phan P, Wai E, Kingwell S, Moravek D, Tierney S, Street J, Sundararajan K, Bosma R, Faclier G, Di Renna T, Rampersaud R, Frederick A, Kassam F, Nicholls F, Swamy G, Lewkonia P, Thomas K, Jacobs B, Miller N, Tanguay R, Soroceanu A, Platt A, Traynelis V, Witiw C, Horn S, Weiser-Horwitz S, Bortz C, Segreto F, Pierce K, Lafage R, Hockley A, Vira S, Lafage V, Witiw C, Wilson J, Nassiri F, da Costa L, Nathens A, Fehlings M, Jacobs B, Alas H, Pierce K, Brown A, Bortz C, Hockley A, Soroceanu A, Vira S, Naessig S, Ahmad W, Lafage R, Lafage V, Witiw C, Wilson J, da Costa L, Nathens A, Fehlings M, Crawford E, McIntosh G, Rampersaud R, Fisher C, Manson N, Thomas K, Hall H, Rampersaud R, Dea N, McIntosh G, Charest-Morin R, Investigators CSORN, Ailon T, Fisher C, Evaniew N, Aldebeyan S, Thomas K, Sundararajan K, Oitment C, Lewis S, Perruccio A, Rampersaud R, Christie S, Yee A, Fisher C, Jarzem P, Roy JF, Bouchard J, Evans D, Kwon B, Splawinski J, Warren D, Street J, Morris S, Costello J, Farrell M, Humphreys S, Kurban D, Rivers C, Jeffrey M, Juutilainen S, Casha S, Christie S, Clarke T, Drew B, Ethans K, Fehlings M, Fox R, Linassi G, Marion T, O’Connell C, Paquet J, Reid J, Scott L, Fourney D, Schouten R, Rivers C, Chen M, Nunnerley J, Croot T, Young L, Patel A, Dvorak M, Kwon B, Rivers C, Buenaventura J, Humphreys S, Noonan V, Fallah N, Evaniew N, Dvorak M, Cronin S, Badhiwala J, Ginsberg H, Fehlings M, Kwon B, Jaglal S, Wilson J, Fehlings M, Fisk F, Versteeg A, Fisher C, Sahgal A, Gokaslan Z, Rhines L, Boriani S, Bettegowda C, Dea N, Martel A, Sahgal A, Finkelstein J, Whyne C, Hardisty M, Baksh N, Nguyen T, Brown S, Jaboin J, Lin C, Yach J, Hardisty M, Whyne C, Fernandez R, Gee A, Urquhart J, Bailey C, Rasoulinejad P, Zhang H, Shewchuk J, Street J, Wilson D, Oxland T, Fernandez R, Gee A, Urquhart J, Bailey C, Rasoulinejad P, Algarni N, Aljarboa N, Jarzem P, Fernandez R, Gee A, Urquhart J, Bailey C, Rasoulinejad P, Whyte T, Van Toen C, Melnyk A, Shewchuk J, Street J, Cripton P, Oxland T, Avila M, Hurlbert RJ, Neuburger L, Ahmed SU, Cheng Y, Fourney D, Hsu HC, Kao CH, Neuburger L, Ahmed SU, Cheng Y, Fourney D, Meves R, de Oliveira AI, da Silva HC, Richard-Denis A, Petit Y, Diotalevi L, Mac-Thiong JM, Laratta J, Bisson E, Carreon L, Yew A, Mkorombindo T, Glassman S, Christie S, Bouchard J, Fisher C, Roy JF, Yee A, Jarzem P, Khurjekar K, Kothari A, Zawar A, Sanchetui P, Shyam A, Touchette C, Han JH, Christie S, Pickett G, Yee A, Bouchard J, Christie S, Fisher C, Jarzem P, Roy JF, Hashem L, Urquhart J, Rasoulinejad P, Gurr K, Siddiqi F, Bailey C, Attabib N, Bigney E, Richardson E, El-Mughayyar D, Darling M, Manson N, Abraham E, Badhiwala J, Jiang F, Wilson J, Fehlings M, Dunning C, Oxner W, Stewart S, Glennie A, Hutchinson J, Oxland T, Zhang H, Shewchuk J, Wilson D, Street J, Wilk S, Wai E, Phan P, Stratton A, Mohammed S, Tsai E, Alkerayf F, Michalowski W, Phan P, Wai E, Hoda M, MacLean M, Brunette-Clément T, Abduljabba F, Weber M, Fourney D, Charest-Morin R, Flexman A, Street J, Frey M, Mackey S, De Carvalho D, Barrowman N, Smit K, Tice A, Mervitz D, Jarvis J, Kingwell S. Canadian Spine SocietyPresentation CPSS1: Spinal insufficiency fracture in the geriatric pediatric spinePresentation CPSS2: The clinical significance of tether breakages in anterior vertebral body growth modulation: a 2-year postoperative analysisPresentation CPSS3: Anterior vertebral body growth modulation for idiopathic scoliosis: early, mid-term and late complicationsPresentation CPSS4: Ovine model of congenital chest wall and spine deformity with alterations of respiratory mechanics: follow-up from birth to 3 monthsPresentation CPSS5: Test–retest reliability and minimum detectable change of the English translation of the Italian Spine Youth Quality of Life questionnaire in adolescents with idiopathic scoliosisPresentation B1. Abstract 31: Incidence of delayed spinal cord injury in pediatric spine deformity surgery seems to be higher than previously assumedPresentation B2. Abstract 155: What is the optimal surgical method for achieving successful symptom relief in pediatric high-grade spondylolisthesis?Presentation B3. Abstract 47: Vertebral body tethering: Truly motion preserving or rather limiting?Presentation B4. Abstract 180: Fusion rates in pediatric patients after posterior cervical spine instrumentationPresentation B5. Abstract 102: Effects of 8 years of growth hormone treatment on the onset and progression of scoliosis in children with Prader–Willi syndromePresentation B6. Abstract 144: Klippel–Feil syndrome: clinical phenotypes associated with surgical treatmentPresentation B7. Abstract 123: Anterior release for idiopathic scoliosis: Is it necessary for curve correction?Presentation B8. Abstract 62: Severe scoliosis: Do we know a better way? A retrospective comparative studyPresentation B9. Abstract 21: Intraoperative skull femoral traction in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: the correlation of traction with side-bending radiographsPresentation B10. Abstract 147: What is the effect of intraoperative halo-femoral traction on correction of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis?Presentation B11. Abstract 174: Extreme long-term outcome of surgically versus non-surgically treated patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosisPresentation B12. Abstract 172: The influence of multilevel spinal deformity surgery on the clinical outcome in the elderly: a prospective, observational, multicentre studyPresentation B13. Abstract 49: Demographics of a prospective evaluation of elderly deformity surgery: a prospective international observational multicentre studyPresentation B14. Abstract 119: Timing of conversion to cervical malalignment and proximal junctional kyphosis following surgical correction of adult spinal deformityPresentation B15. Abstract 44: Prioritization of realignment associated with superior clinical outcomes for surgical cervical deformity patientsPresentation B16. Abstract 50: Outcome of multilevel spinal deformity surgery in patients over 60 years of age: a multicentre international prospective studyPresentation B17. Abstract 122: A simpler, modified frailty index weighted by complication occurrence correlates to pain and disability for adult spinal deformity patientsPresentation B18. Abstract 75: Change in Oswestry Disability Index at 24 months following multilevel spinal deformity surgery in patients over 60 years of age: a multicentre international prospective studyPresentation C19. Abstract 19: A prospective cohort study evaluating trends in the surgical treatment of degenerative spondylolisthesis in Canada and the utility of a novel surgical decision aidPresentation C20. Abstract 154: Decompression compared with decompression and fusion for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: a Canadian Spine Outcomes and Research Network (CSORN) studyPresentation C21. Abstract ID 77: Lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis: factors impacting decision to fusePresentation C22. Abstract 27: Patient-reported outcomes following surgery for lumbar disc herniation: comparison of a universal and multitier health care systemPresentation C23. Abstract 151: Do patients with recurrent lumbar disc herniations fair worse with discectomy than primary operations? A retrospective analysis from the Canadian Spine Outcomes and Research NetworkPresentation C24. Abstract 136: A province-wide assessment of the appropriateness of lumbar spine MRIPresentation D25. Abstract 32: Surgical site infection reduction — a 10-year quality improvement journeyPresentation D26. Abstract 34: The impact of frailty on patient-reported outcome measures following elective thoraco-lumbar spine surgeryPresentation D27. Abstract 8: Moving toward better health: exercise practice is associated with improved outcomes after spine surgeryPresentation D28. Abstract 33: Preoperative decolonization does not adversely affect the microbiologic spectrum of spine surgical site infectionPresentation D29. Abstract 61: Feedback: reducing after-hours spine cases using an encrypted messaging systemPresentation D30. Abstract 177: Complex spine surgery is safe and effective in the extremely elderly age group: results from an ambispective study of 722 patients over 75 years old from a single institutionPresentation E31. Abstract 38: Clinical predictors of achieving minimal clinically important difference after surgery for cervical spondylotic myelopathy: an external validation study from the Canadian Spine Outcomes and Research NetworkPresentation E32. Abstract 66: The natural history of degenerative cervical myelopathy: an ambispective longitudinal cohort studyPresentation E33. Abstract 159: Quantitative assessment of gait characteristics in degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM): a prospective studyPresentation E34. Abstract 130: Prognostic factors in degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) for patients managed operatively and nonoperativelyPresentation E35. Abstract 175: Efficacy of surgical decompression in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy: results of a Canadian prospective multicentre studyPresentation E36. Abstract 67: Interobserver reliability of the modified Japanese Orthopedic Association (mJOA) score in degenerative cervical myelopathyPresentation F37. Abstract 128: Continuous optical monitoring of spinal cord hemodynamics during the first 7 days after injury in a porcine model of acute spinal cord injuryPresentation F38. Abstract 106: Development of a prediction model for central cord syndrome: an evaluation of motor recovery and the effectiveness of early surgery in a prospective, multicentre cohortPresentation F39. Abstract 135: Spinal cord dynamics under different clinical configurations of thoracolumbar burst fractures through numerical simulationsPresentation F40. Abstract 60: Predicting the heterogeneity of outcome following sensorimotor complete cervical spinal cord injury: trajectory-based analysis of 655 prospectively enrolled patientsPresentation F41. Abstract 167: Mortality in the year following discharge to the community from inpatient care for acute traumatic spinal cord injury: When and why?Presentation F42. Abstract 104: A novel method to classify patients with cervical incomplete spinal cord injury based on potential for recovery: a group-based trajectory analysis using prospective, multicentre data from over 800 patientsPresentation G43. Abstract 7: Responsiveness of standard spine outcome tools: Do they measure up?Presentation G44. Abstract 142: Patient outcomes: important psychological measuresPresentation G45. Abstract 84: Accuracy of surveillance for surgical site infections after spine surgery: a Bayesian latent class analysis using 4 independent data sourcesPresentation G46. Abstract 169: Econometric modelling: development of a surgical cost calculator for degenerative conditions of the lumbar spinePresentation G47. Abstract 124: The economic impact of nonreimbursable events in open, minimally invasive and robot-assisted lumbar fusion surgeryPresentation G48. Abstract 164: Are there sex differences in preoperative health status and health care delivery for patients undergoing scheduled lumbar surgery? An analysis from the Canadian Spine Outcomes and Research NetworkPresentation H49. Abstract 41: Patient phenotypes associated with functional outcomes after spinal cord injury: a principal component analysis in 1119 patientsPresentation H50. Abstract 103: Early versus late surgical decompression for acute traumatic spinal cord injury: a pooled analysis of prospective, multicentre data in 1548 patientsPresentation H51. Abstract 79: Clinical outcome correlation of diffusion tensor imaging and magnetic resonance imaging values: a systematic reviewPresentation H52. Abstract 137: A numerical study on the pathogenesis of central cord syndromePresentation H53. Abstract 42: Feasibility and utility of machine learning in prediction of bladder outcomes after spinal cord injury: analysis of 1250 patients from the European Multicenter Study about Spinal Cord Injury (EMSCI) registryPresentation H54. Abstract 18: Interventions to optimize spinal cord perfusion in patients with acute traumatic spinal cord injuries: a systematic reviewPresentation i55. Abstract 55: The effect of posterior lumbar spinal surgery on passive stiffness of rat paraspinal muscles 13 weeks post-surgeryPresentation i56. Abstract 43: A computed tomographic based morphometric analysis of the axis in adult populationPresentation i57. Abstract 92: Is there value to flexion–extension x-rays for degenerative spondylolisthesis? A multicentre retrospective studyPresentation i58. Abstract 98: The novel “7/20 EMG protocol” in combination with O-arm image-guided navigation for accurate lumbar pedicle placement while minimizing diagnostic radiation exposurePresentation i59. Abstract 148: Comparative biomechanical study of 2 types of transdiscal fixation implants for high-grade L5/S1 spine spondylolisthesis in a porcine modelPresentation i60. Abstract 85: The effects of fibre bundle size and vertebral level on passive stiffness of the lumbar paraspinal muscles in a rat modelPresentation J61. Abstract 157: A self-assembling peptide biomaterial to enhance human neural stem cell-based regeneration of the injured spinal cordPresentation J62. Abstract 162: Measuring demyelination, axonal loss and inflammation after human spinal cord injury with quantitative magnetic resonance imaging and histopathologyPresentation J63. Abstract 179: Characterization of ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase L1 (UCH-L1) as a fluid biomarker of human traumatic spinal cord injuryPresentation J64. Abstract 13: Utility and role of virtual reality based simulation models in spinal decompression trainingPresentation J65. Abstract 160: Investigating the determinants for predicting surgical patient outcomes through the application of machine learning methodsPresentation J66. Abstract 143: Comparison of screw design and technique on cervical lateral mass screw fixationPresentation K67. Abstract 57: Development of clinical prognostic models for postoperative survival and quality of life in patients with surgically treated metastatic epidural spinal cord compressionPresentation K68. Abstract 170: Sarcomas of the spine: a 20-year survey of disease and treatment strategy in Ontario, CanadaPresentation K69. Abstract 15: Metastatic spine disease: Should patients with short life expectancy be denied surgical care? An international retrospective cohort studyPresentation K70. Abstract 29: Nanoparticle-functionalized polymethyl methacrylate bone cement for sustained chemotherapeutic drug deliveryPresentation K71. Abstract 90: Development of the Spine Oncology Study Group Outcomes Questionnaire – 8 Domain (SOSGOQ-8D)Presentation K72. Abstract 6: Treatment expectations of patients with spinal metastases: What do we tell our patients?Presentation L73. Abstract 48: Factors related to risk of opioid abuse in primary care patients with low back painPresentation L74. Abstract 65: QI/QA of a transitional outpatient pain program for spinePresentation L75. Abstract 168: The effect of preoperative opioid use on hospital length of stay in patients undergoing elective spine surgeryPresentation L76. Abstract 163: Disability or pain: Which best predicts patient satisfaction with surgical outcome? A Canadian Spine Outcomes and Research Network (CSORN) studyPresentation L77. Abstract 58: Rapid access to interventional pain management for lumbar nerve root pain through collaborative interprofessional provider networksPresentation L78. Abstract 63: Chronic preoperative opioid use associated with higher perioperative resource utilization and complications in adult spinal deformity patientsPresentation M79. Abstract 108: Cervical disc arthroplasty versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a longitudinal analysis of reoperationsPresentation M80. Abstract 46: Preliminary results of randomized controlled trial investigating the role of psychological distress on cervical spine surgery outcomes: a baseline analysisPresentation M81. Abstract 110: Operative versus nonoperative treatment of geriatric odontoid fractures: a study of North American trauma centresPresentation M82. Abstract 74: Clinical outcome of posterior cervical foraminotomy versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusionPresentation M83. Abstract 45: “Reverse Roussouly”: ratios of cervical to thoracic shape curvature in an adult cervical deformity populationPresentation M84. Abstract 109: Treatment of acute traumatic central cord syndrome: a study of North American trauma centresPresentation N85. Abstract 118: Comparing minimally invasive versus traditional open lumbar decompression and fusion surgery: a Canadian Spine Outcomes and Research Network (CSORN) studyPresentation N86. Abstract 54: Time to return to work after lumbar spine surgeryPresentation N87. Abstract 28: Patient-reported outcomes following surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis: comparison of a universal and multitier health care systemPresentation N88. Abstract 93: Outcomes of surgery in older adults with lumbar spinal stenosisPresentation N89. Abstract 162: Functional objective assessment using the TUG test is a useful tool to evaluate outcome in lumbar spinal stenosisPresentation N90. Abstract 36: A Canadian Spine Outcomes and Research Network (CSORN) matched-cohort study comparing lumbar fusion and disk arthroplastyPresentation o91. Abstract 171: Development of clinical practice guidelines for the management of traumatic spinal column and cord injuries in British Columbia: an approach to standardizing care of spine trauma patientsPresentation o92. Abstract 22: Notes from a small island: stemming the tide of a spinal deluge. The use of encrypted software applications to ensure accountability, quality control and surgical consensus in a national acute adult spinal surgery centrePresentation o93. Abstract 129: Traumatic spinal cord injuries among Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal populations in Canada: an ambispective outcomes studyPresentation o94. Abstract 132: Traumatic spinal cord injury in New Zealand and Canada: a comparative analysisPresentation o95. Abstract 150: Exploring the reasons for readmission following traumatic spinal cord injuryPresentation o96. Abstract 59: Exploring the epidemiology and impact of spinal cord injury in the elderly: a 15-year Canadian population-based cohort studyPresentation P1. Abstract 139: Incidence and management of spinal metastasis in Ontario: a population-based studyPresentation P2. Abstract 91: A general population utility valuation study for the Spine Oncology Study Group Outcomes Questionnaire – 8DPresentation P3. Abstract 158: Metastatic vertebrae segmentation by augmented 3D convolutional neural networkPresentation P4. Abstract 73: Risk factors for failure of radiation therapy for spinal metastasesPresentation P5. Abstract 68: Significance of extracanalicular cement extravasation in thoracolumbar kyphoplastyPresentation P6. Abstract 120: Modelling fracture in osteoblastic vertebraePresentation P7. Abstract 97: The development of novel 2-in-1 patient-specific, 3D-printed laminar osteotomy guides with integrated pedicle screw guidesPresentation P8. Abstract 56: Effect of pelvic retroversion on pelvic geometry and muscle morphometry from upright magnetic resonance imagingPresentation P9. Abstract 161: Anatomic relationship between the accessory process of the lumbar spine and the pedicle screw entry pointPresentation P10. Abstract 20: Novel chair to measure lumbar spine extensors strength in adultsPresentation P11. Abstract 95: Error measurement between human spine, 3D scans, CT-based models, and 3D-printed modelsPresentation P12. Abstract 52: The diagnostic precision of computed tomography for traumatic cervical spine injury: an in vitro investigationPresentation P13. Abstract 94: Epidural abscess causing spinal cord infarctionPresentation P14. Abstract 83: The nerve root sedimentation sign on magnetic resonance imaging is not only correlated with neurogenic claudication: association with all types of leg-dominant mechanical painPresentation P15. Abstract 3: Accuracy of robot-assisted compared with freehand pedicle screw placement in spine surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trialsPresentation P16. Abstract 82: A positive nerve root sedimentation sign on magnetic resonance imaging is associated with improved surgical outcomes in patients with back dominant painPresentation P17. Abstract 16: Thoracolumbar burst fracture: McCormack load-sharing classification —systematic review and single-arm meta-analysisPresentation P18. Abstract 86: Morphological features of thoracolumbar burst fractures associated with neurologic recovery after thoracolumbar traumatic spinal cord injuryPresentation P19. Abstract 89: Radiographic parameters of listhesis and instability are not associated with health status or clinical outcomes in grade 1 degenerative spondylolisthesisPresentation P20. Abstract 37: Predictive socioeconomic factors following lumbar disk arthroplasty: a Canadian Spine Outcomes and Research Network (CSORN) studyPresentation P21. Abstract 25: Effect of in situ fusion in lumbar spondylolisthesis on clinical outcomes and spino-pelvic sagittal balancingPresentation P22. Abstract 10: Sex differences in the surgical management of lumbar degenerative disease: a systematic reviewPresentation P23. Abstract 35: Two-year results of lumbar disk arthroplasty: a Canadian Spine Outcomes and Research Network (CSORN) studyPresentation P24. Abstract 78: Does disc morphology affect the success of nonoperative treatment of chronic sciatica from a lumbar disc herniation?Presentation P25. Abstract 141: Opioid prescribing patterns: preliminary investigationPresentation P26. Abstract 133: Frailty is a better predictor of complications than age alone after surgical treatment of degenerative cervical myelopathy: an ambispective study of 5107 elderly patients from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program databasePresentation P27. Abstract 26: Pathway analysis in spine surgery: a model for evaluating length of stayPresentation P29. Abstract 156: Patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) have different cervical lordosis than the normal populationPresentation P31. Abstract 64: Investigation of thoracic spinal muscle morphology with upright magnetic resonance imagingPresentation P32. Abstract 80: Postoperative complication prediction between spinal surgeons and a machine learning model: a comparative studyPresentation P33. Abstract 81: Is using a simplified procedural classification as accurate as using current procedural terminology codes to predict future complications in spinal surgery?Presentation P34. Abstract 88: Preoperative patient performance status and frailty phenotype as predictive factors of outcome in surgically treated patients with metastatic spinal disease: a systematic literature reviewPresentation P35. Abstract 101: The measurements of frailty and their application to spine surgeryPresentation P36. Abstract 131: The effect of prolonged sitting on muscle reflexes of the low backPresentation P37. Abstract 87: Implementing a rapid discharge pathway for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis in Canada. Can J Surg 2020. [DOI: 10.1503/cjs.014720] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/01/2022] Open
|
25
|
Nouri A, Tetreault L, Nori S, Martin AR, Nater A, Fehlings MG. Congenital Cervical Spine Stenosis in a Multicenter Global Cohort of Patients With Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy: An Ambispective Report Based on a Magnetic Resonance Imaging Diagnostic Criterion. Neurosurgery 2019; 83:521-528. [PMID: 29462433 DOI: 10.1093/neuros/nyx521] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2017] [Accepted: 02/09/2018] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Congenital spinal stenosis (CSS) of the cervical spine is a risk factor for acute spinal cord injury and development of degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM). OBJECTIVE To develop magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based criteria to diagnose preexisting CSS and evaluate differences between patients with and without CSS. METHODS A secondary analysis of international prospectively collected data between 2005 and 2011 was conducted. We examined the data of 349 surgical DCM patients and 27 controls. Spinal canal and cord anteroposterior diameters were measured at noncompressed sites to calculate spinal cord occupation ratio (SCOR). Torg-Pavlov ratios and spinal canal diameters from radiographs were correlated with SCOR. Clinical and MRI factors were compared between patients with and without CSS. Surgical outcomes were also assessed. RESULTS Calculation of SCOR was feasible in 311/349 patients. Twenty-six patients with CSS were identified (8.4%). Patients with CSS were younger than patients without CSS (P = .03) and had worse baseline severity as measured by the modified Japanese Orthopedic Association score (P = .04), Nurick scale (P = .05), and Neck Disability Index (P < .01). CSS patients more commonly had T2 cord hyperintensity changes (P = .09, ns) and worse SF-36 Physical Component scores (P = .06, ns). SCOR correlated better with Torg-Pavlov ratio and spinal canal diameter at C3 than C5. Patients with SCOR ≥ 65% were also younger but did not differ in baseline severity. CONCLUSION SCOR ≥ 70% is an effective criterion to diagnose CSS. CSS patients develop myelopathy at a younger age and have greater impairment and disability than other patients with DCM. Despite this, CSS patients have comparable duration of symptoms, MRI presentations, and surgical outcomes to DCM patients without CSS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aria Nouri
- Division of Neurosurgery and Spine Program, University of Toronto, Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Department of Neurosurgery, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Lindsay Tetreault
- Division of Neurosurgery and Spine Program, University of Toronto, Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Satoshi Nori
- Division of Neurosurgery and Spine Program, University of Toronto, Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Allan R Martin
- Division of Neurosurgery and Spine Program, University of Toronto, Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Anick Nater
- Division of Neurosurgery and Spine Program, University of Toronto, Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Michael G Fehlings
- Division of Neurosurgery and Spine Program, University of Toronto, Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Davies BM, Khan DZ, Mowforth OD, McNair AGK, Gronlund T, Kolias AG, Tetreault L, Starkey ML, Sadler I, Sarewitz E, Houlton D, Carter J, Kalsi-Ryan S, Aarabi B, Kwon BK, Kurpad SN, Harrop J, Wilson JR, Grossman R, Curt A, Fehlings MG, Kotter MRN. RE-CODE DCM ( REsearch Objectives and Common Data Elements for Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy): A Consensus Process to Improve Research Efficiency in DCM, Through Establishment of a Standardized Dataset for Clinical Research and the Definition of the Research Priorities. Global Spine J 2019; 9:65S-76S. [PMID: 31157148 PMCID: PMC6512197 DOI: 10.1177/2192568219832855] [Citation(s) in RCA: 67] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Mixed-method consensus process. OBJECTIVES Degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) is a common and disabling condition that arises when mechanical stress damages the spinal cord as a result of degenerative changes in the surrounding spinal structures. RECODE-DCM (REsearch Objectives and Common Data Elements for Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy) aims to improve efficient use of health care resources within the field of DCM by using a multi-stakeholder partnership to define the DCM research priorities, to develop a minimum dataset for DCM clinical studies, and confirm a definition of DCM. METHODS This requires a multi-stakeholder partnership and multiple parallel consensus development processes. It will be conducted via 4 phases, adhering to the guidance set out by the COMET (Core Outcomes in Effectiveness Trials) and JLA (James Lind Alliance) initiatives. Phase 1 will consist of preliminary work to inform online Delphi processes (Phase 2) and a consensus meeting (Phase 3). Following the findings of the consensus meeting, a synthesis of relevant measurement instruments will be compiled and assessed as per the COSMIN (Consensus-based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments) criteria, to allow recommendations to be made on how to measure agreed data points. Phase 4 will monitor and promote the use of eventual recommendations. CONCLUSIONS RECODE-DCM sets out to establish for the first time an index term, minimum dataset, and research priorities together. Our aim is to reduce waste of health care resources in the future by using patient priorities to inform the scope of future DCM research activities. The consistent use of a standard dataset in DCM clinical studies, audit, and clinical surveillance will facilitate pooled analysis of future data and, ultimately, a deeper understanding of DCM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benjamin M Davies
- Academic Neurosurgery Unit, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Danyal Z Khan
- Academic Neurosurgery Unit, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Oliver D Mowforth
- Academic Neurosurgery Unit, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | | | - Toto Gronlund
- James Lind Alliance, National Institute for Health Research, Southampton, UK
| | - Angelos G Kolias
- Academic Neurosurgery Unit, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Lindsay Tetreault
- Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Michelle L Starkey
- Academic Neurosurgery Unit, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | | | | | | | | | - Sukhvinder Kalsi-Ryan
- Toronto Rehabilitation Institute-LC, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Brian K Kwon
- Vancouver General Hospital, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | | | - James Harrop
- Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | | | | | - Armin Curt
- Balgrist University Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Michael G Fehlings
- Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Mark R N Kotter
- Academic Neurosurgery Unit, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
- Wellcome Trust & MRC Cambridge Stem Cell Institute, Cambridge, UK
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Tetreault L, Nater A, Garwood P, Badhiwala JH, Wilson JR, Fehlings MG. Development and Implementation of Clinical Practice Guidelines: An Update and Synthesis of the Literature With a Focus in Application to Spinal Conditions. Global Spine J 2019; 9:53S-64S. [PMID: 31157146 PMCID: PMC6512193 DOI: 10.1177/2192568219831689] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Review. OBJECTIVES The objectives of this review are to (a) summarize the role of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs), (b) outline the methodology involved in formulating CPGs, (c) provide an illustration of these principles using a CPG developed for degenerative cervical myelopathy, and (d) highlight the importance of knowledge translation. METHODS A review of the literature was conducted to summarize current standards in CPG development and implementation. RESULTS CPGs are systematically developed statements intended to affect decisions made by health care providers, policy makers, and patients. The main objectives of CPGs are to synthesize and translate evidence into recommendations, optimize patient outcomes, standardize care, and facilitate shared decision making among physicians, patients, and their caregivers. The main steps involved in the development of CPGs include defining the clinical problem, assembling a multidisciplinary guideline development group and systematic review team, conducting a systematic review of the literature, translating the evidence to recommendations, critically appraising the CPG and updating the document when new studies arise. The final step in developing a CPG is to implement it into clinical practice; this step requires an assessment of the barriers to implementation and the formulation of effective dissemination strategies. CONCLUSION CPGs are an important component in the teaching and practice of medicine and are available for a wide spectrum of diseases. CPGs, however, can only be used to influence clinical practice if the recommendations are informed by a systematic review of the literature and developed using rigorous methodology. The opportunity to transform clinical management of spinal conditions is an attractive outcome of the application of high-quality CPGs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lindsay Tetreault
- Krembil Neuroscience Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- University College Cork, Cork, Ireland
| | - Anick Nater
- Krembil Neuroscience Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Jetan H. Badhiwala
- Krembil Neuroscience Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Michael G. Fehlings
- Krembil Neuroscience Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Tetreault L, Nakashima H, Kato S, Kryshtalskyj M, Nagoshi N, Nouri A, Singh A, Fehlings MG. A Systematic Review of Classification Systems for Cervical Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament. Global Spine J 2019; 9:85-103. [PMID: 30775213 PMCID: PMC6362555 DOI: 10.1177/2192568217720421] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
DESIGN Systematic review. OBJECTIVE To conduct a systematic review to (1) summarize various classification systems used to describe cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) and (2) evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of various imaging modalities and the reliability of these classification systems. METHODS A search was performed to identify studies that used a classification system to categorize patients with OPLL. Furthermore, studies were included if they reported the diagnostic accuracy of various imaging modalities or the reliability of a classification system. RESULTS A total of 167 studies were deemed relevant. Five classification systems were developed based on X-ray: the 9-classification system (0.60%); continuous, segmental, mixed, localized or focal, circumscribed and others (92.81%); hook, staple, bridge, and total types (2.40%); distribution of OPLL (2.40%); and K-line classification (4.19%). Six methods were based on computed tomography scans: free-type, contiguous-type, and broken sign (0.60%); hill-, plateau-, square-, mushroom-, irregular-, or round-shaped (5.99%); rectangular, oval, triangular, or pedunculate (1.20%); centralized or laterally deviated (1.80%); plank-, spindle-, or rod-shaped (0.60%); and rule of nine (0.60%). Classification systems based on 3-dimensional computed tomography were bridging and nonbridging (1.20%) and flat, irregular, and localized (0.60%). A single classification system was based on magnetic resonance imaging: triangular, teardrop, or boomerang. Finally, a variation of methods was used to classify OPLL associated with the dura mater (4.19%). CONCLUSIONS The most common method of classification was that proposed by the Japanese Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare. Other important methods include K-line (+/-), signs of dural ossification, and patterns of distribution.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lindsay Tetreault
- Department of Surgery, Division of Neurosurgery and Spinal Program, University of Toronto, Toronto Western Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada,Institute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada,These authors contributed equally to this work
| | - Hiroaki Nakashima
- Department of Surgery, Division of Neurosurgery and Spinal Program, University of Toronto, Toronto Western Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada,Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan,These authors contributed equally to this work
| | - So Kato
- Department of Surgery, Division of Neurosurgery and Spinal Program, University of Toronto, Toronto Western Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Michael Kryshtalskyj
- Department of Surgery, Division of Neurosurgery and Spinal Program, University of Toronto, Toronto Western Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada,Institute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Nagoshi Nagoshi
- Department of Surgery, Division of Neurosurgery and Spinal Program, University of Toronto, Toronto Western Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada,Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Aria Nouri
- Department of Surgery, Division of Neurosurgery and Spinal Program, University of Toronto, Toronto Western Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada,Institute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Anoushka Singh
- Department of Surgery, Division of Neurosurgery and Spinal Program, University of Toronto, Toronto Western Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada,Institute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Michael G. Fehlings
- Department of Surgery, Division of Neurosurgery and Spinal Program, University of Toronto, Toronto Western Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada,Institute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada,Michael G. Fehlings, Toronto Western Hospital, 399 Bathurst St, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5T 2S8.
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Tetreault L, Wilson JR, Kotter MRN, Côté P, Nouri A, Kopjar B, Arnold PM, Fehlings MG. Is Preoperative Duration of Symptoms a Significant Predictor of Functional Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Surgery for the Treatment of Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy? Neurosurgery 2018; 85:642-647. [DOI: 10.1093/neuros/nyy474] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2017] [Accepted: 09/12/2018] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
BACKGROUND
Preoperative duration of symptoms may significantly impact outcomes in patients treated surgically for degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM).
OBJECTIVE
To (i) analyze whether duration of symptoms is associated with preoperative functional impairment, disability, and quality of life and (ii) determine the optimal timing for decompressive surgery.
METHODS
Patients with DCM were prospectively enrolled in either the AOSpine North American or International study at 26 global sites (n = 757). Postoperative functional impairment was evaluated at 1-yr using the modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association (mJOA) score. Change scores between baseline and 1-yr were computed for the mJOA. Duration of symptoms was dichotomized into a “short” and “long” group at several cut-offs. Analysis of covariance was used to evaluate differences in change scores on the mJOA between duration of symptoms groups in 4-mo increments.
RESULTS
Our cohort consisted of 424 men and 255 women, with a mean duration of symptoms of 26.1 ± 36.4 mo (0.25-252 mo). Duration of symptoms was not correlated with preoperative mJOA, Nurick, Neck Disability Index, or Short-Form (SF)-36 Physical and Mental Component Scores. Patients with a duration of symptoms shorter than 4 mo had significantly better functional outcomes on the mJOA than patients with a longer duration of symptoms (>4 mo). Thirty-two months was also a significant cut-off.
CONCLUSION
Patients who are operated on within 4 mo of symptom presentation have better mJOA outcomes than those treated after 4 mo. It is recommended that patients with DCM are diagnosed in a timely fashion and managed appropriately.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lindsay Tetreault
- Division of Neurosurgery, Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Graduate Entry Medicine, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland
| | - Jefferson R Wilson
- Division of Neurosurgery, Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Neurosurgery, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Mark R N Kotter
- Division of Neurosurgery, Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Cambridge University, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Pierre Côté
- Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ontario Institute of Technology, Oshawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Aria Nouri
- Division of Neurosurgery, Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Branko Kopjar
- Department of Health Services, School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Paul M Arnold
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Kansas, Kansas City, Kansas
| | - Michael G Fehlings
- Division of Neurosurgery, Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Martin AR, De Leener B, Cohen-Adad J, Kalsi-Ryan S, Cadotte DW, Wilson JR, Tetreault L, Nouri A, Crawley A, Mikulis DJ, Ginsberg H, Massicotte EM, Fehlings MG. Monitoring for myelopathic progression with multiparametric quantitative MRI. PLoS One 2018; 13:e0195733. [PMID: 29664964 PMCID: PMC5903654 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0195733] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2017] [Accepted: 03/28/2018] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Patients with mild degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) are often managed non-operatively, and surgery is recommended if neurological progression occurs. However, detection of progression is often subjective. Quantitative MRI (qMRI) directly measures spinal cord (SC) tissue changes, detecting axonal injury, demyelination, and atrophy. This longitudinal study compared multiparametric qMRI with clinical measures of progression in non-operative DCM patients. Methods 26 DCM patients were followed. Clinical data included modified Japanese Orthopedic Association (mJOA) and additional assessments. 3T qMRI data included cross sectional area, diffusion fractional anisotropy, magnetization transfer ratio, and T2*-weighted white/grey matter signal ratio, extracted from the compressed SC and above/below. Progression was defined as 1) patients’ subjective impression, 2) 2-point mJOA decrease, 3) ≥3 clinical measures worsening ≥5%, 4) increased compression on MRI, or 5) ≥1 of 10 qMRI measures or composite score worsening (p < 0.004, corrected). Results Follow-up (13.5 ± 4.9 months) included mJOA in all 26 patients, MRI in 25, and clinical/qMRI in 22. 42.3% reported subjective worsening, compared with mJOA (11.5%), MRI (20%), comprehensive assessments (54.6%), and qMRI (68.2%). Relative to subjective worsening, qMRI showed 100% sensitivity and 53.3% specificity compared with comprehensive assessments (75%, 60%), mJOA (27.3%, 100%), and MRI (18.2%, 81.3%). A decision-making algorithm incorporating qMRI identified progression and recommended surgery for 11 subjects (42.3%). Conclusions Quantitative MRI shows high sensitivity to detect myelopathic progression. Our results suggest that neuroplasticity and behavioural adaptation may mask progressive SC tissue injury. qMRI appears to be a useful method to confirm subtle myelopathic progression in individual patients, representing an advance toward clinical translation of qMRI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Aria Nouri
- University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
Martin AR, De Leener B, Cohen-Adad J, Cadotte DW, Nouri A, Wilson JR, Tetreault L, Crawley AP, Mikulis DJ, Ginsberg H, Fehlings MG. Can microstructural MRI detect subclinical tissue injury in subjects with asymptomatic cervical spinal cord compression? A prospective cohort study. BMJ Open 2018; 8:e019809. [PMID: 29654015 PMCID: PMC5905727 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019809] [Citation(s) in RCA: 51] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) involves extrinsic spinal cord compression causing tissue injury and neurological dysfunction. Asymptomatic spinal cord compression (ASCC) is more common, but its significance is poorly defined. This study investigates if: (1) ASCC can be automatically diagnosed using spinal cord shape analysis; (2) multiparametric quantitative MRI can detect similar spinal cord tissue injury as previously observed in DCM. DESIGN Prospective observational longitudinal cohort study. SETTING Single centre, tertiary care and research institution. PARTICIPANTS 40 neurologically intact subjects (19 female, 21 male) divided into groups with and without ASCC. INTERVENTIONS None. OUTCOME MEASURES Clinical assessments: modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association score and physical examination. 3T MRI assessments: automated morphometric analysis compared with consensus ratings of spinal cord compression, and measures of tissue injury: cross-sectional area, diffusion fractional anisotropy, magnetisation transfer ratio and T2*-weighted imaging white to grey matter signal intensity ratio (T2*WI WM/GM) extracted from rostral (C1-3), caudal (C6-7) and maximally compressed levels. RESULTS ASCC was present in 20/40 subjects. Diagnosis with automated shape analysis showed area under the curve >97%. Five MRI metrics showed differences suggestive of tissue injury in ASCC compared with uncompressed subjects (p<0.05), while a composite of all 10 measures (average of z scores) showed highly significant differences (p=0.002). At follow-up (median 21 months), two ASCC subjects developed DCM. CONCLUSIONS ASCC appears to be common and can be accurately and objectively diagnosed with automated morphometric analysis. Quantitative MRI appears to detect subclinical tissue injury in ASCC prior to the onset of neurological symptoms and signs. These findings require further validation, but offer the intriguing possibility of presymptomatic diagnosis and treatment of DCM and other spinal pathologies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Allan R Martin
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Benjamin De Leener
- Institute of Biomedical Engineering, École Polytechnique de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Julien Cohen-Adad
- Institute of Biomedical Engineering, École Polytechnique de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - David W Cadotte
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Aria Nouri
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jefferson R Wilson
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Lindsay Tetreault
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Medicine, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland
| | - Adrian P Crawley
- Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - David J Mikulis
- Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Howard Ginsberg
- Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Michael G Fehlings
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Tetreault L, Palubiski LM, Kryshtalskyj M, Idler RK, Martin AR, Ganau M, Wilson JR, Kotter M, Fehlings MG. Significant Predictors of Outcome Following Surgery for the Treatment of Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy. Neurosurg Clin N Am 2018; 29:115-127.e35. [DOI: 10.1016/j.nec.2017.09.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 58] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
|
33
|
Martin AR, Tadokoro N, Tetreault L, Arocho-Quinones EV, Budde MD, Kurpad SN, Fehlings MG. Imaging Evaluation of Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy. Neurosurg Clin N Am 2018; 29:33-45. [DOI: 10.1016/j.nec.2017.09.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/16/2023]
|
34
|
Parker SL, Chotai S, Devin CJ, Tetreault L, Mroz TE, Brodke DS, Fehlings MG, McGirt MJ. Bending the Cost Curve-Establishing Value in Spine Surgery. Neurosurgery 2017; 80:S61-S69. [PMID: 28350948 DOI: 10.1093/neuros/nyw081] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2016] [Accepted: 10/31/2016] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND As publically promoted by all stakeholders in health care reform, prospective outcomes registry platforms lie at the center of all current evidence-driven value-based models. OBJECTIVE To demonstrate the variability in outcomes and cost at population level and individual patient level for patients undergoing spine surgery for degenerative diseases. METHODS Retrospective analysis of prospective longitudinal spine registry data was conducted. Baseline and postoperative 1-year patient-reported outcomes were recorded. Previously published minimal clinically important difference for Oswestry Disability Index (14.9) was used. Back-related resource utilization and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) were assessed. Variations in outcomes and cost were analyzed at population level and at the individual patient level. RESULTS A total of 1454 patients were analyzed. There was significant improvement in patient-reported outcomes at postoperative 1 year ( P < .0001). For patients demonstrating health benefit at population level, 12.5%, n = 182 of patients experienced no gain from surgery and 38%, n = 554 failed to achieve minimal clinically important difference. Mean 1-year QALY-gained was 0.29; 18% of patients failed to report gain in QALY. For patients with 2-year follow-up, surgery resulted in 0.62 QALY-gained at average direct cost of $28 953. A wide variation in both QALY-gained and cost was observed. CONCLUSION Spine treatments that on average are cost-effective may have wide variability in value at the individual patient level. The variability demonstrated here represents an opportunity, through registries, to identify specific care that may be less effective, and refine patient-specific care delivery and indications to drive overall group-level treatment value. Understanding value of spine care at an individualized as well as population level will allow clinicians, and eventually payers, to better target resources for improving care for nonresponders, ultimately driving up the average health for the whole population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Scott L Parker
- Department of Orthopedics Surgery and Neurological surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Silky Chotai
- Department of Orthopedics Surgery and Neurological surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Clinton J Devin
- Department of Orthopedics Surgery and Neurological surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Lindsay Tetreault
- Spinal Cord Injury Clinical Research Unit, Krembil Neuroscience Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
| | - Thomas E Mroz
- Center for Spine Health, Department of Neurosurgery and Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Darrel S Brodke
- Department of Orthopedics, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | | | - Matthew J McGirt
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Carolina Neurosurgery and Spine Associates, Charlotte, North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Ahuja CS, Nori S, Tetreault L, Wilson J, Kwon B, Harrop J, Choi D, Fehlings MG. Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury-Repair and Regeneration. Neurosurgery 2017; 80:S9-S22. [PMID: 28350947 DOI: 10.1093/neuros/nyw080] [Citation(s) in RCA: 452] [Impact Index Per Article: 64.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2016] [Accepted: 01/12/2017] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Traumatic spinal cord injuries (SCI) have devastating consequences for the physical, financial, and psychosocial well-being of patients and their caregivers. Expediently delivering interventions during the early postinjury period can have a tremendous impact on long-term functional recovery. PATHOPHYSIOLOGY This is largely due to the unique pathophysiology of SCI where the initial traumatic insult (primary injury) is followed by a progressive secondary injury cascade characterized by ischemia, proapoptotic signaling, and peripheral inflammatory cell infiltration. Over the subsequent hours, release of proinflammatory cytokines and cytotoxic debris (DNA, ATP, reactive oxygen species) cyclically adds to the harsh postinjury microenvironment. As the lesions mature into the chronic phase, regeneration is severely impeded by the development of an astroglial-fibrous scar surrounding coalesced cystic cavities. Addressing these challenges forms the basis of current and upcoming treatments for SCI. MANAGEMENT This paper discusses the evidence-based management of a patient with SCI while emphasizing the importance of early definitive care. Key neuroprotective therapies are summarized including surgical decompression, methylprednisolone, and blood pressure augmentation. We then review exciting neuroprotective interventions on the cusp of translation such as Riluzole, Minocycline, magnesium, therapeutic hypothermia, and CSF drainage. We also explore the most promising neuroregenerative strategies in trial today including Cethrin™, anti-NOGO antibody, cell-based approaches, and bioengineered biomaterials. Each section provides a working knowledge of the key preclinical and patient trials relevant to clinicians while highlighting the pathophysiologic rationale for the therapies. CONCLUSION We conclude with our perspectives on the future of treatment and research in this rapidly evolving field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher S Ahuja
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.,Institute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.,Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.,Department of Genetics and Development, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Satoshi Nori
- Department of Genetics and Development, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | | | - Jefferson Wilson
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.,Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.,Spine Program, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Brian Kwon
- Vancouver Spine Institute, Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, Canada.,Department of Surgery, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - James Harrop
- Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - David Choi
- National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, University College London, London, England
| | - Michael G Fehlings
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.,Institute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.,Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.,Spine Program, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.,Department of Genetics and Development, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Nouri A, Martin AR, Nater A, Witiw CD, Kato S, Tetreault L, Reihani-Kermani H, Santaguida C, Fehlings MG. Influence of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Features on Surgical Decision-Making in Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy: Results from a Global Survey of AOSpine International Members. World Neurosurg 2017. [DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2017.06.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|
37
|
Parker SL, Chotai S, Devin CJ, Tetreault L, McGirt MJ. 338 Variation in the Cost/Benefit of Spine Surgery at the Individual Patient Level. Neurosurgery 2017. [DOI: 10.1093/neuros/nyx417.338] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
|
38
|
Nagoshi N, Tetreault L, Nakashima H, Arnold PM, Barbagallo G, Kopjar B, Fehlings MG. Risk Factors for and Clinical Outcomes of Dysphagia After Anterior Cervical Surgery for Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy: Results from the AOSpine International and North America Studies. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2017; 99:1069-1077. [PMID: 28678119 DOI: 10.2106/jbjs.16.00325] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although dysphagia is a common complication after anterior cervical decompression and fusion, important risk factors have not been rigorously evaluated. Furthermore, the impact of dysphagia on neurological and quality-of-life outcomes is not fully understood. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of and risk factors for dysphagia, and the impact of this complication on short and long-term clinical outcomes, in patients treated with anterior cervical decompression and fusion. METHODS Four hundred and seventy patients undergoing a 1-stage anterior or 2-stage anteroposterior cervical decompression and fusion were enrolled in the prospective AOSpine CSM (Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy) North America or International study at 26 global sites. Logistic regression analyses were conducted to determine important clinical and surgical predictors of perioperative dysphagia. Preoperatively and at each follow-up visit, patients were evaluated using the modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association scale (mJOA), Nurick score, Neck Disability Index (NDI), and Short Form-36 Health Survey (SF-36). A 2-way repeated-measures analysis of covariance was used to evaluate differences in outcomes at 6 and 24 months between patients with and those without dysphagia, while controlling for relevant baseline characteristics and surgical factors. RESULTS The overall prevalence of dysphagia was 6.2%. Bivariate analysis showed the major risk factors for perioperative dysphagia to be a higher comorbidity score, older age, a cardiovascular or endocrine disorder, a lower SF-36 Physical Component Summary score, 2-stage surgery, and a greater number of decompressed levels. Multivariable analysis showed patients to be at an increased risk of perioperative dysphagia if they had an endocrine disorder, a greater number of decompressed segments, or 2-stage surgery. Both short and long-term improvements in functional, disability, and quality-of-life scores were comparable between patients with and those without dysphagia. CONCLUSIONS The most important predictors of dysphagia are an endocrine disorder, a greater number of decompressed levels, and 2-stage surgery. At the time of both short and long-term follow-up, patients with perioperative dysphagia exhibited improvements in functional, disability, and quality-of life scores that were similar to those of patients without dysphagia. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Narihito Nagoshi
- 1Division of Neurosurgery and Spinal Program, Department of Surgery (N.N., L.T., H.N., and M.G.F.), and Institute of Medical Science (L.T. and M.G.F.), Toronto Western Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada 2Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan 3Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan 4University of Kansas, Kansas City, Kansas 5Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Catania, Catania, Italy 6Department of Health Services, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
39
|
Kato S, Nouri A, Wu D, Nori S, Tetreault L, Fehlings MG. Comparison of Anterior and Posterior Surgery for Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy: An MRI-Based Propensity-Score-Matched Analysis Using Data from the Prospective Multicenter AOSpine CSM North America and International Studies. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2017. [PMID: 28632590 DOI: 10.2106/jbjs.16.00882] [Citation(s) in RCA: 64] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Surgeons often choose between 2 different approaches (anterior and posterior) for surgical treatment of degenerative cervical myelopathy on the basis of imaging features of spinal cord compression, the number of levels affected, and the spinal alignment. However, there is a lack of consensus on which approach is preferable. The objective of the present study was to use magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based propensity-score-matched analysis to compare postoperative outcomes between the anterior and posterior surgical approaches for degenerative cervical myelopathy. METHODS A total of 757 patients were enrolled in 2 prospective multicenter AOSpine studies, which involved 26 international sites. Preoperative MRIs were reviewed to characterize the causes of the cord compression, including single-level disc disease, multilevel disc disease, ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament, enlargement of the ligamentum flavum, vertebral subluxation/spondylolisthesis, congenital fusion, number of compressed levels, or kyphosis. The propensity to choose anterior decompression was calculated using demographic data, preoperative MRI findings, and the modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association (mJOA) scores in a logistic regression model. We then performed 1-to-1 matching of patients who had received anterior decompression with those who had the same propensity score but had received posterior decompression to compare 2-year postoperative outcomes and 30-day perioperative complication rates between the 2 groups after adjustment for background characteristics. RESULTS A total of 435 cases were included in the propensity score calculation, and 1-to-1 matching resulted in 80 pairs of anterior and posterior surgical cases; 99% of these matched patients had multilevel compression. The anterior and posterior groups did not differ significantly in terms of the postoperative mJOA score (15.1 versus 15.3, p = 0.53), Neck Disability Index (20.5 versus 24.1, p = 0.44), or Short Form-36 (SF-36) Physical Component Summary (PCS) score (41.9 versus 40.9, p = 0.30). The overall rates of perioperative complications were similar between the 2 groups (16% versus 11%, p = 0.48); however, dysphagia/dysphonia was reported only in the anterior group whereas surgical site infection and C5 radiculopathy were reported only in the posterior group. CONCLUSIONS Anterior and posterior decompression for degenerative cervical myelopathy resulted in similar postoperative outcomes and rates of complications. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- So Kato
- 1Division of Neurosurgery, Toronto Western Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
40
|
Nater A, Murray JC, Martin AR, Nouri A, Tetreault L, Fehlings MG. The Need for Clinical Practice Guidelines in Assessing and Managing Perioperative Neurologic Deficit: Results from a Survey of the AOSpine International Community. World Neurosurg 2017. [PMID: 28625903 DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2017.06.029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES There is no standardized approach to assess and manage perioperative neurologic deficit (PND) in patients undergoing spinal surgery. This survey aimed to evaluate the awareness and usage of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) as well as investigate how surgeons performing spine surgeries feel about and manage PND and how they perceive the value of developing CPGs for the management of PND. METHODS An invitation to participate was sent to the AOSpine International community. Questions were related to the awareness, usage of CPGs, and demographics. Results from the entire sample and subgroups were analyzed. RESULTS Of 770 respondents, 659 (85.6%) reported being aware of the existence of guideline(s), and among those, 578 (87.7%) acknowledged using guideline(s). Overall, 58.8% of surgeons reported not feeling comfortable managing a patient who wakes up quadriplegic after an uneventful multilevel posterior cervical decompression with instrumented fusion. Although 22.9% would consider an immediate return to the operating room, the other 77.1% favored conducting some kind of investigation/medical intervention first, such as performing magnetic resonance imaging (85.9%), administrating high-dose corticosteroids (50.2%), or increasing the mean arterial pressure (44.7%). Overall, 90.6% of surgeons believed that CPGs for the management of PND would be useful and 94.4% would be either likely or extremely likely to use these CPGs in their clinical practice. CONCLUSIONS Most respondents are aware and routinely use CPGs in their practice. Most surgeons performing spine surgeries reported not feeling comfortable managing PND. However, they highly value the creation and are likely to use CPGs in its management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anick Nater
- Division of Neurosurgery, Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Allan R Martin
- Division of Neurosurgery, Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Aria Nouri
- Department of Neurosurgery, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Lindsay Tetreault
- Division of Neurosurgery, Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Graduate Entry Medicine, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland
| | - Michael G Fehlings
- Division of Neurosurgery, Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Division of Surgery, University of Toronto Spine Program, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Vidal PM, Karadimas SK, Ulndreaj A, Laliberte AM, Tetreault L, Forner S, Wang J, Foltz WD, Fehlings MG. Delayed decompression exacerbates ischemia-reperfusion injury in cervical compressive myelopathy. JCI Insight 2017; 2:92512. [PMID: 28570271 DOI: 10.1172/jci.insight.92512] [Citation(s) in RCA: 57] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2016] [Accepted: 04/27/2017] [Indexed: 01/21/2023] Open
Abstract
Degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) is the most common progressive nontraumatic spinal cord injury. The most common recommended treatment is surgical decompression, although the optimal timing of intervention is an area of ongoing debate. The primary objective of this study was to assess whether a delay in decompression could influence the extent of ischemia-reperfusion injury and alter the trajectory of outcome in DCM. Using a DCM mouse model, we show that decompression acutely led to a 1.5- to 2-fold increase in levels of inflammatory cytokines within the spinal cord. Delayed decompression was associated with exacerbated reperfusion injury, astrogliosis, and poorer neurological recovery. Additionally, delayed decompression was associated with prolonged elevation of inflammatory cytokines and an exacerbated peripheral monocytic inflammatory response (P < 0.01 and 0.001). In contrast, early decompression led to resolution of reperfusion-mediated inflammation, neurological improvement, and reduced hyperalgesia. Similar findings were observed in subjects from the CSM AOSpine North America and International studies, where delayed decompressive surgery resulted in poorer neurological improvement compared with patients with an earlier intervention. Our data demonstrate that delayed surgical decompression for DCM exacerbates reperfusion injury and is associated with ongoing enhanced levels of cytokine expression, microglia activation, and astrogliosis, and paralleled with poorer neurological recovery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pia M Vidal
- Division of Genetics & Development, Toronto Western Research Institute and Spine Program, Krembil Neuroscience Center, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Spyridon K Karadimas
- Division of Genetics & Development, Toronto Western Research Institute and Spine Program, Krembil Neuroscience Center, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Institute of Medical Science
| | - Antigona Ulndreaj
- Division of Genetics & Development, Toronto Western Research Institute and Spine Program, Krembil Neuroscience Center, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Institute of Medical Science
| | - Alex M Laliberte
- Division of Genetics & Development, Toronto Western Research Institute and Spine Program, Krembil Neuroscience Center, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Institute of Medical Science
| | - Lindsay Tetreault
- Department of Surgery, Division of Neurosurgery and Spine Program, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Stefania Forner
- Department of Pharmacology, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, Brazil
| | - Jian Wang
- Division of Genetics & Development, Toronto Western Research Institute and Spine Program, Krembil Neuroscience Center, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Warren D Foltz
- Spatio-Temporal Targeting and Amplification of Radiation Responses (STTARR) Innovation Centre, Department of Radiation Oncology, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Michael G Fehlings
- Division of Genetics & Development, Toronto Western Research Institute and Spine Program, Krembil Neuroscience Center, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Department of Surgery, Division of Neurosurgery and Spine Program, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Martin AR, De Leener B, Cohen-Adad J, Cadotte DW, Kalsi-Ryan S, Lange SF, Tetreault L, Nouri A, Crawley A, Mikulis DJ, Ginsberg H, Fehlings MG. Clinically Feasible Microstructural MRI to Quantify Cervical Spinal Cord Tissue Injury Using DTI, MT, and T2*-Weighted Imaging: Assessment of Normative Data and Reliability. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2017; 38:1257-1265. [PMID: 28428213 DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.a5163] [Citation(s) in RCA: 49] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2016] [Accepted: 01/28/2017] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE DTI, magnetization transfer, T2*-weighted imaging, and cross-sectional area can quantify aspects of spinal cord microstructure. However, clinical adoption remains elusive due to complex acquisitions, cumbersome analysis, limited reliability, and wide ranges of normal values. We propose a simple multiparametric protocol with automated analysis and report normative data, analysis of confounding variables, and reliability. MATERIALS AND METHODS Forty healthy subjects underwent T2WI, DTI, magnetization transfer, and T2*WI at 3T in <35 minutes using standard hardware and pulse sequences. Cross-sectional area, fractional anisotropy, magnetization transfer ratio, and T2*WI WM/GM signal intensity ratio were calculated. Relationships between MR imaging metrics and age, sex, height, weight, cervical cord length, and rostrocaudal level were analyzed. Test-retest coefficient of variation measured reliability in 24 DTI, 17 magnetization transfer, and 16 T2*WI datasets. DTI with and without cardiac triggering was compared in 10 subjects. RESULTS T2*WI WM/GM showed lower intersubject coefficient of variation (3.5%) compared with magnetization transfer ratio (5.8%), fractional anisotropy (6.0%), and cross-sectional area (12.2%). Linear correction of cross-sectional area with cervical cord length, fractional anisotropy with age, and magnetization transfer ratio with age and height led to decreased coefficients of variation (4.8%, 5.4%, and 10.2%, respectively). Acceptable reliability was achieved for all metrics/levels (test-retest coefficient of variation < 5%), with T2*WI WM/GM comparing favorably with fractional anisotropy and magnetization transfer ratio. DTI with and without cardiac triggering showed no significant differences for fractional anisotropy and test-retest coefficient of variation. CONCLUSIONS Reliable multiparametric assessment of spinal cord microstructure is possible by using clinically suitable methods. These results establish normalization procedures and pave the way for clinical studies, with the potential for improving diagnostics, objectively monitoring disease progression, and predicting outcomes in spinal pathologies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A R Martin
- From the Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery (A.R.M., D.W.C., S.K.-R., L.T., A.N., H.G., M.G.F.)
| | - B De Leener
- Polytechnique Montreal (B.D.L., J.C.-A.), Montréal, Quebec, Canada
| | - J Cohen-Adad
- Polytechnique Montreal (B.D.L., J.C.-A.), Montréal, Quebec, Canada
- Functional Neuroimaging Unit (J.C.-A.), Centre de recherche de l'Institut universitaire de gériatrie de Montréal, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Quebec, Canada
| | - D W Cadotte
- From the Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery (A.R.M., D.W.C., S.K.-R., L.T., A.N., H.G., M.G.F.)
| | - S Kalsi-Ryan
- From the Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery (A.R.M., D.W.C., S.K.-R., L.T., A.N., H.G., M.G.F.)
| | - S F Lange
- University of Groningen (S.F.L.), Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - L Tetreault
- From the Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery (A.R.M., D.W.C., S.K.-R., L.T., A.N., H.G., M.G.F.)
| | - A Nouri
- From the Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery (A.R.M., D.W.C., S.K.-R., L.T., A.N., H.G., M.G.F.)
| | - A Crawley
- Department of Medical Imaging (A.C., D.J.M.), University of Toronto and the University Health Network, Toronto Western Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - D J Mikulis
- Department of Medical Imaging (A.C., D.J.M.), University of Toronto and the University Health Network, Toronto Western Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - H Ginsberg
- From the Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery (A.R.M., D.W.C., S.K.-R., L.T., A.N., H.G., M.G.F.)
| | - M G Fehlings
- From the Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery (A.R.M., D.W.C., S.K.-R., L.T., A.N., H.G., M.G.F.)
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Abstract
This study, made on 60 chronic mental patients, had aimed to determine the effective dosage of trihexyphenidyl, an antiparkinsonian drug. During the preliminary period all patients were given a standard medication consisting of a neuroleptic, trifluoperazine 60 mg. daily, and an antiparkinsonian agent, trihexyphenidyl 10 mg. daily. A placebo was substituted for the antiparkinsonian during the first experimental period to measure the patients' extrapyramidal sensitivity. This evaluation was performed with a rating scale (B.E.P.) and observations from the nursing staff. Patients were divided into three groups of 20 according to their B.E.P. score and received one of the three therapeutic regimens: trihexyphenidyl 15 mg. or 6 mg. or placebo. Analyses of the results allow us to conclude that for this population a daily dosage of 6 mg. of trihexyphenidyl gives as much protection as 15 mg.; patients receiving an antiparkinsonian agent needed less “p.r.n.” administration of prociclydine. We have also found that if the antiparkinsonian drug can control some extrapyramidal symptoms it might be responsible for the presence of other more complex neurological symptoms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - L. Tetreault
- Hôpital Saint-Jean-de-Dieu; Université de Montréal
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Martin AR, De Leener B, Cohen-Adad J, Cadotte DW, Kalsi-Ryan S, Lange SF, Tetreault L, Nouri A, Crawley A, Mikulis DJ, Ginsberg H, Fehlings MG. A Novel MRI Biomarker of Spinal Cord White Matter Injury: T2*-Weighted White Matter to Gray Matter Signal Intensity Ratio. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2017; 38:1266-1273. [PMID: 28428212 DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.a5162] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2016] [Accepted: 01/29/2017] [Indexed: 01/30/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE T2*-weighted imaging provides sharp contrast between spinal cord GM and WM, allowing their segmentation and cross-sectional area measurement. Injured WM demonstrates T2*WI hyperintensity but requires normalization for quantitative use. We introduce T2*WI WM/GM signal-intensity ratio and compare it against cross-sectional area, the DTI metric fractional anisotropy, and magnetization transfer ratio in degenerative cervical myelopathy. MATERIALS AND METHODS Fifty-eight patients with degenerative cervical myelopathy and 40 healthy subjects underwent 3T MR imaging, covering C1-C7. Metrics were automatically extracted at maximally compressed and uncompressed rostral/caudal levels. Normalized metrics were compared with t tests, area under the curve, and logistic regression. Relationships with clinical measures were analyzed by using Pearson correlation and multiple linear regression. RESULTS The maximally compressed level cross-sectional area demonstrated superior differences (P = 1 × 10-13), diagnostic accuracy (area under the curve = 0.890), and univariate correlation with the modified Japanese Orthopedic Association score (0.66). T2*WI WM/GM showed strong differences (rostral: P = 8 × 10-7; maximally compressed level: P = 1 × 10-11; caudal: P = 1 × 10-4), correlations (modified Japanese Orthopedic Association score; rostral: -0.52; maximally compressed level: -0.59; caudal: -0.36), and diagnostic accuracy (rostral: 0.775; maximally compressed level: 0.860; caudal: 0.721), outperforming fractional anisotropy and magnetization transfer ratio in most comparisons and cross-sectional area at rostral/caudal levels. Rostral T2*WI WM/GM showed the strongest correlations with focal motor (-0.45) and sensory (-0.49) deficits and was the strongest independent predictor of the modified Japanese Orthopedic Association score (P = .01) and diagnosis (P = .02) in multivariate models (R2 = 0.59, P = 8 × 10-13; area under the curve = 0.954, respectively). CONCLUSIONS T2*WI WM/GM shows promise as a novel biomarker of WM injury. It detects damage in compressed and uncompressed regions and contributes substantially to multivariate models for diagnosis and correlation with impairment. Our multiparametric approach overcomes limitations of individual measures, having the potential to improve diagnostics, monitor progression, and predict outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A R Martin
- From the Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery (A.R.M., D.W.C., S.K.-R., L.T., A.N., H.G., M.G.F.)
| | - B De Leener
- Polytechnique Montreal (B.D.L., J.C.-A.), Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - J Cohen-Adad
- Polytechnique Montreal (B.D.L., J.C.-A.), Montreal, Quebec, Canada.,Functional Neuroimaging Unit (J.C.-A.), Centre de recherche de l'Institut universitaire de gériatrie de Montréal, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - D W Cadotte
- From the Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery (A.R.M., D.W.C., S.K.-R., L.T., A.N., H.G., M.G.F.)
| | - S Kalsi-Ryan
- From the Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery (A.R.M., D.W.C., S.K.-R., L.T., A.N., H.G., M.G.F.)
| | - S F Lange
- University of Groningen (S.F.L.), Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - L Tetreault
- From the Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery (A.R.M., D.W.C., S.K.-R., L.T., A.N., H.G., M.G.F.)
| | - A Nouri
- From the Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery (A.R.M., D.W.C., S.K.-R., L.T., A.N., H.G., M.G.F.)
| | - A Crawley
- Department of Medical Imaging (A.C., D.J.M.), University of Toronto and the University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - D J Mikulis
- Department of Medical Imaging (A.C., D.J.M.), University of Toronto and the University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - H Ginsberg
- From the Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery (A.R.M., D.W.C., S.K.-R., L.T., A.N., H.G., M.G.F.)
| | - M G Fehlings
- From the Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery (A.R.M., D.W.C., S.K.-R., L.T., A.N., H.G., M.G.F.)
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Nagoshi N, Fehlings MG, Nakashima H, Tetreault L, Gum JL, Smith ZA, Hsu WK, Tannoury CA, Tannoury T, Traynelis VC, Arnold PM, Mroz TE, Gokaslan ZL, Bydon M, De Giacomo AF, Jobse BC, Massicotte EM, Riew KD. Prevalence and Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Reintubation After Anterior Cervical Spine Surgery: Results From the AOSpine North America Multicenter Study on 8887 Patients. Global Spine J 2017; 7:96S-102S. [PMID: 28451501 PMCID: PMC5400189 DOI: 10.1177/2192568216687753] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN A multicenter, retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE To evaluate clinical outcomes in patients with reintubation after anterior cervical spine surgery. METHODS A total of 8887 patients undergoing anterior cervical spine surgery were enrolled in the AOSpine North America Rare Complications of Cervical Spine Surgery study. Patients with or without complications after surgery were included. Demographic and surgical information were collected for patients with reintubation. Patients were evaluated using a variety of assessment tools, including the modified Japanese Orthopedic Association scale, Nurick score, Neck Disability Index, and Short Form-36 Health Survey. RESULTS Nine cases of postoperative reintubation were identified. The total prevalence of this complication was 0.10% and ranged from 0% to 0.59% across participating institutions. The time to development of airway symptoms after surgery was within 24 hours in 6 patients and between 5 and 7 days in 3 patients. Although 8 patients recovered, 1 patient died. At final follow-up, patients with reintubation did not exhibit significant and meaningful improvements in pain, functional status, or quality of life. CONCLUSIONS Although the prevalence of reintubation was very low, this complication was associated with adverse clinical outcomes. Clinicians should identify their high-risk patients and carefully observe them for up to 2 weeks after surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Narihito Nagoshi
- Toronto Western Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada,Keio University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Michael G. Fehlings
- Toronto Western Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada,Michael G. Fehlings, Division of Neurosurgery, Toronto Western Hospital, 399 Bathurst St, Suite 4WW-449, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5T2S8.
| | - Hiroaki Nakashima
- Toronto Western Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada,Nagoya University, Nagoya, Japan
| | | | | | - Zachary A. Smith
- Northwestern University, Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Wellington K. Hsu
- Northwestern University, Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Ziya L. Gokaslan
- Brown University, Providence, RI, USA,Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, RI, USA,The Miriam Hospital, Providence, RI, USA,Norman Prince Neurosciences Institute, Providence, RI, USA
| | | | | | | | - Eric M. Massicotte
- Toronto Western Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada,University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - K. Daniel Riew
- Columbia University, New York, NY, USA, NewYork-Presbyterian/The Allen Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Davies BM, McHugh M, Elgheriani A, Kolias AG, Tetreault L, Hutchinson PJA, Fehlings MG, Kotter MRN. The reporting of study and population characteristics in degenerative cervical myelopathy: A systematic review. PLoS One 2017; 12:e0172564. [PMID: 28249017 PMCID: PMC5332071 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0172564] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2016] [Accepted: 02/07/2017] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECT Degenerative cervical myelopathy [DCM] is a disabling and increasingly prevalent condition. Variable reporting in interventional trials of study design and sample characteristics limits the interpretation of pooled outcomes. This is pertinent in DCM where baseline characteristics are known to influence outcome. The present study aims to assess the reporting of the study design and baseline characteristics in DCM as the premise for the development of a standardised reporting set. METHODS A systematic review of MEDLINE and EMBASE databases, registered with PROSPERO (CRD42015025497) was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Full text articles in English, with >50 patients (prospective) or >200 patients (retrospective), reporting outcomes of DCM were deemed to be eligible. RESULTS A total of 108 studies involving 23,876 patients, conducted world-wide, were identified. 33 (31%) specified a clear primary objective. Study populations often included radiculopathy (51, 47%) but excluded patients who had undergone previous surgery (42, 39%). Diagnositic criteria for myelopathy were often uncertain; MRI assessment was specified in only 67 (62%) of studies. Patient comorbidities were referenced by 37 (34%) studies. Symptom duration was reported by 46 (43%) studies. Multivariate analysis was used to control for baseline characteristics in 33 (31%) of studies. CONCLUSIONS The reporting of study design and sample characteristics is variable. The development of a consensus minimum dataset for (CODE-DCM) will facilitate future research synthesis in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benjamin M. Davies
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - M. McHugh
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - A. Elgheriani
- Division of Neurosurgery and Spine Program Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network & University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Angelos G. Kolias
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
- WT MRC Cambridge Stem Cell Institute, Anne McLaren Laboratory, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Lindsay Tetreault
- Division of Neurosurgery and Spine Program Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network & University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Peter J. A. Hutchinson
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
- John van Geest Brain Repair Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Michael G. Fehlings
- Division of Neurosurgery and Spine Program Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network & University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Mark R. N. Kotter
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
- Division of Neurosurgery and Spine Program Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network & University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
- WT MRC Cambridge Stem Cell Institute, Anne McLaren Laboratory, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
- John van Geest Brain Repair Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Samuel N, Tetreault L, Santaguida C, Nater A, Moayeri N, Massicotte EM, Fehlings MG. Clinical and pathological outcomes after resection of intramedullary spinal cord tumors: a single-institution case series. Neurosurg Focus 2017; 41:E8. [PMID: 27476850 DOI: 10.3171/2016.5.focus16147] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to identify clinically relevant predictors of progression-free survival and functional outcomes in patients who underwent surgery for intramedullary spinal cord tumors (ISCTs). METHODS An institutional spinal tumor registry and billing records were reviewed to identify adult patients who underwent resection of ISCTs between 1993 and 2014. Extensive data were collected from patient charts and operative notes, including demographic information, extent of resection, tumor pathology, and functional and oncological outcomes. Survival analysis was used to determine important predictors of progression-free survival. Logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate the association between an "optimal" functional outcome on the Frankel or McCormick scale at 1-year follow-up and various clinical and surgical characteristics. RESULTS The consecutive case series consisted of 63 patients (50.79% female) who underwent resection of ISCTs. The mean age of patients was 41.92 ± 14.36 years (range 17.60-75.40 years). Complete microsurgical resection, defined as no evidence of tumor on initial postoperative imaging, was achieved in 34 cases (54.84%) of the 62 patients for whom this information was available. On univariate analysis, the most significant predictor of progression-free survival was tumor histology (p = 0.0027). Patients with Grade I/II astrocytomas were more likely to have tumor progression than patients with WHO Grade II ependymomas (HR 8.03, 95% CI 2.07-31.11, p = 0.0026) and myxopapillary ependymomas (HR 8.01, 95% CI 1.44-44.34, p = 0.017). Furthermore, patients who underwent radical or subtotal resection were more likely to have tumor progression than those who underwent complete resection (HR 3.46, 95% CI 1.23-9.73, p = 0.018). Multivariate analysis revealed that tumor pathology was the only significant predictor of tumor progression. On univariate analysis, the most significant predictors of an "optimal" outcome on the Frankel scale were age (OR 0.94, 95% CI 0.89-0.98, p = 0.0062), preoperative Frankel grade (OR 4.84, 95% CI 1.33-17.63, p = 0.017), McCormick score (OR 0.22, 95% CI 0.084-0.57, p = 0.0018), and region of spinal cord (cervical vs conus: OR 0.067, 95% CI 0.012-0.38, p = 0.0023; and thoracic vs conus: OR 0.015: 95% CI 0.001-0.20, p = 0.0013). Age, tumor pathology, and region were also important predictors of 1-year McCormick scores. CONCLUSIONS Extent of tumor resection and histopathology are significant predictors of progression-free survival following resection of ISCTs. Important predictors of functional outcomes include tumor histology, region of spinal cord in which the tumor is present, age, and preoperative functional status.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Lindsay Tetreault
- Division of Neurosurgery, University Health Network, University of Toronto
| | - Carlo Santaguida
- Division of Neurosurgery, University Health Network, University of Toronto
| | - Anick Nater
- Institute of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto;,Department of Surgery, Division of Neurosurgery, University of Toronto
| | - Nizar Moayeri
- Division of Neurosurgery, University Health Network, University of Toronto;,Krembil Neuroscience Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Eric M Massicotte
- Division of Neurosurgery, University Health Network, University of Toronto;,Department of Surgery, Division of Neurosurgery, University of Toronto
| | - Michael G Fehlings
- Institute of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto;,Department of Surgery, Division of Neurosurgery, University of Toronto;,Department of Genetics and Development, Toronto Western Hospital; and.,Krembil Neuroscience Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Nakashima H, Tetreault L, Kato S, Kryshtalskyj MT, Nagoshi N, Nouri A, Singh A, Fehlings MG. Prediction of Outcome Following Surgical Treatment of Cervical Myelopathy Based on Features of Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament. JBJS Rev 2017; 5:01874474-201702000-00005. [DOI: 10.2106/jbjs.rvw.16.00023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
|
49
|
Fehlings MG, Tetreault L, Hsieh PC, Traynelis V, Wang MY. Introduction: Degenerative cervical myelopathy: diagnostic, assessment, and management strategies, surgical complications, and outcome prediction. Neurosurg Focus 2017; 40:E1. [PMID: 27246479 DOI: 10.3171/2016.3.focus16111] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Lindsay Tetreault
- Krembil Research Institute, Toronto Western Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Patrick C Hsieh
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Vincent Traynelis
- Department of Neurosurgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois; and
| | - Michael Y Wang
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Miami, Florida
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Nagoshi N, Tetreault L, Nakashima H, Nouri A, Fehlings MG. Return to play in athletes with spinal cord concussion: a systematic literature review. Spine J 2017; 17:291-302. [PMID: 27836772 DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2016.09.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2016] [Revised: 08/05/2016] [Accepted: 09/12/2016] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN This is a systematic review. PURPOSE The study aimed to evaluate whether spinal cord concussion (SCC) patients can safely return to play sports and if there are factors that can predict SCC recurrence or the development of a spinal cord injury (SCI). BACKGROUND CONTEXT Although SCC is a reversible neurologic disturbance of spinal cord function, its management and the implications for return to play are controversial. METHODS We conducted a systematic search of the literature using the keywords Cervical Spine AND Sports AND Injuries in six databases. We examined return to play in patients (1) without stenosis, (2) with stenosis, and (3) who underwent single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). We also investigated predictors for the risk of SCC recurrence or SCI. RESULTS We identified 3,655 unique citations, 16 of which met our inclusion criteria. The included studies were case-control studies or case series and reports. Two studies reported on patients without stenosis: pediatric cases returned without recurrence, whereas an adult case experienced recurrent SCC after returning to play. Seven studies described patients with stenosis. These studies included cases with and without recurrence after return to play, as well as patients who suffered SCI with permanent neurologic deficits. Three studies reported on patients who underwent an ACDF. Although some patients played after surgery without problems, several patients experienced recurrent SCC due to herniation at levels adjacent to the surgical sites. With respect to important predictors, a greater frequency of patients who experienced recurrence of symptoms or SCI following return to play had a "long" duration of symptoms (>24 hours; 36.36%) compared with those who were problem-free (11.11%; p=.0311). CONCLUSIONS There is limited evidence on current practice standards for return to play following SCC and important risk factors for SCC recurrence or SCI. Because of small sample sizes, future prospective multicenter studies are needed to determine important predictive factors of poor outcomes following return to play after SCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Narihito Nagoshi
- Department of Surgery, Division of Neurosurgery and Spinal Program, University of Toronto, Toronto Western Hospital, 399 Bathurst St, Toronto M5T 2S8, Ontario, Canada; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 160-8582, Japan
| | - Lindsay Tetreault
- Department of Surgery, Division of Neurosurgery and Spinal Program, University of Toronto, Toronto Western Hospital, 399 Bathurst St, Toronto M5T 2S8, Ontario, Canada
| | - Hiroaki Nakashima
- Department of Surgery, Division of Neurosurgery and Spinal Program, University of Toronto, Toronto Western Hospital, 399 Bathurst St, Toronto M5T 2S8, Ontario, Canada; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, 65 Tsurumai-cho, Showa-ku, Nagoya 466-8560, Japan
| | - Aria Nouri
- Department of Surgery, Division of Neurosurgery and Spinal Program, University of Toronto, Toronto Western Hospital, 399 Bathurst St, Toronto M5T 2S8, Ontario, Canada
| | - Michael G Fehlings
- Department of Surgery, Division of Neurosurgery and Spinal Program, University of Toronto, Toronto Western Hospital, 399 Bathurst St, Toronto M5T 2S8, Ontario, Canada; Institute of Medical Science, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Medical Sciences Building 1 King's College Circle, Room 2374, Toronto M5S 1A8, Ontario, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|