[Cost-effectiveness analysis of dapagliflozin compared to DPP4 inhibitors and other oral antidiabetic drugs in the treatment of type-2 diabetes mellitus in Spain]

Objetivo

Evaluar la eficiencia de la terapia combinada de metformina y dapagliflozina, un nuevo antidiabético oral con un mecanismo de acción independiente de la insulina, en el tratamiento de la diabetes mellitus tipo 2 (DM2) en comparación con inhibidores de DPP4, sulfonilureas y tiazolidindionas, combinados también con metformina.

Diseño

Análisis de coste-efectividad utilizando un modelo de simulación de eventos discretos a partir de los resultados de los ensayos clínicos disponibles y considerando un horizonte temporal de toda la vida del paciente.

Emplazamiento

Perspectiva del Sistema Nacional de Salud.

Participantes

El modelo simuló la historia natural de 30.000 pacientes con DM2 para cada opción comparada.

Mediciones principales

Años de vida ajustados por calidad (AVAC) y consecuencias económicas del manejo de la enfermedad y sus complicaciones. Se consideraron los costes directos (actualizados a euros de 2013) y se aplicó un descuento del 3% tanto para costes como para resultados en salud.

Resultados

El análisis principal comparó dapagliflozina con los inhibidores de DPP4, resultando dapagliflozina como una opción de tratamiento que aportaría una ligera mayor efectividad (0,019 AVAC) con menores costes totales asociados (−42 €). En los análisis adicionales, dapagliflozina fue una opción coste-efectiva en comparación con sulfonilureas y tiazolidindionas con razones de coste por AVAC ganado de 3.560 € y 2.007 €, respectivamente. Los análisis de sensibilidad univariantes y probabilístico confirmaron la solidez de los resultados.

Conclusiones

Los resultados del análisis realizado sugieren que dapagliflozina, en combinación con metformina, sería una alternativa coste-efectiva en el contexto español para el tratamiento de la DM2.

Cost-effectiveness Analysis Comparing Apixaban and Acenocoumarol in the Prevention of Stroke in Patients With Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation in Spain

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

Cost-effectiveness analysis of apixaban (5 mg twice daily) vs acenocoumarol (5mg/day) in the prevention of stroke in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation in Spain.

METHODS

Markov model covering the patient's entire lifespan with 10 health states. Data on the efficacy and safety of the drugs were provided by the ARISTOTLE trial. Warfarin and acenocoumarol were assumed to have therapeutic equivalence.

PERSPECTIVES

The Spanish National Health System and society. Information on the cost of the drugs, complications, and the management of the disease was obtained from Spanish sources.

RESULTS

In a cohort of 1000 patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation, administration of apixaban rather than acenocoumarol would avoid 18 strokes, 71 hemorrhages (28 intracranial or major), 2 myocardial infarctions, 1 systemic embolism, and 23 related deaths. Apixaban would prolong life (by 0.187 years) and result in more quality-adjusted life years (by 0.194 years) per patient. With apixaban, the incremental costs for the Spanish National Health System and for society would be € 2,488 and € 1,826 per patient, respectively. Consequently, the costs per life year gained would be € 13,305 and € 9,765 and the costs per quality-adjusted life year gained would be € 12,825 and € 9,412 for the Spanish National Health System and for society, respectively. The stability of the baseline case was confirmed by sensitivity analyses.

CONCLUSIONS

According to this analysis, apixaban may be cost-effective in the prevention of stroke in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation compared with acenocoumarol.

[Budgetary impact for the National Health System of apixaban prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism in patients undergoing total knee or hip replacement]

BACKGROUND

Due to high health care costs of venous thromboembolism (VTE), economic analyses are needed to determine the efficiency of different drug treatments. Consequently, a study was conducted to estimate the budgetary impact for the National Health System (NHS) with apixaban for prevention of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in total hip (THR) or knee (TKR) replacement.

METHODS

Cost considered: the drugs for the prevention of VTE (apixaban, dabigatran, enoxaparin, fondaparinux, other heparins, rivaroxaban and warfarin) and the complications of VTE in the short term and in 5 years (deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, bleedings and the post-thrombotic syndrome). The effectiveness of prophylaxis was estimated using a meta-analysis. The VTE rates and death with apixaban are lower in THR and TKR than enoxaparin (-3.5% and -10.0%, respectively) with less bleeding events (-0.7% and -1.6%, respectively). Population data and unit costs were obtained from Spanish sources.

TIME HORIZON

5 years. All costs were discounted by 3.5% annually. Five years after commercialization, the use of apixaban was estimated to account for 23% of the prophylaxis of VTE and the use of enoxaparin decrease from the 60% to 33%.

RESULTS

Apixaban´s introduction for the prophylaxis of VTE would have a significant impact for the NHS, resulting in a saving of 547,422 Euro over a period of 5 years. In the case of outpatient administration of heparin did not have a cost, the savings for the NHS five years amount to 270,068 Euro.

CONCLUSIONS

According to this study, the introduction of apixaban may reduce the rate of VTE and bleeding compared with enoxaparin, decreasing the expenditure of NHS in VTE prophylaxis.