[Primary lymphedema in childhood]

Lymphedema results from impaired lymphatic transport with increased limb volume and is divided into primary and secondary forms. In children, primary lymphedema is the most frequent, with a sporadic, rarely familial form or associated with complex malformative or genetic disorders. Diagnosis of lymphedema is mainly clinical and lymphoscintigraphy is useful to assess the lymphatic function of both limbs precisely. The main differential diagnosis is overgrowth syndrome. Erysipelas (cellulitis) is the main complication, but psychological or functional discomfort may occur throughout the course of lymphedema. Lymphedema management is based on multilayer low-stretch bandage, skin care, and eventually manual lymph drainage. The objective of treatment is to reduce lymphedema volume and then stabilize it. Multilayer low-stretch bandage and elastic compression are the cornerstone of treatment. Parent's motivation, including self-management, is required to ensure the child's compliance and improve quality of life.

[Upper limb lymphedema revealing breast cancer]

INTRODUCTION

Upper limb lymphedema occurs in 15 to 20% of patients after breast cancer treatment. Upper limb lymphedema without any history of neoplasia is an unusual situation. In this situation, breast cancer should be suspected.

EXEGESIS

We reported two women, 53 and 67 years old, who developed upper limb lymphedema, 18 and 8 months before the diagnosis of breast cancer. In the two cases, clinical examination (breast and axillary palpation) was normal. In one case, mammography led to the diagnosis and in the other breast MRI was required to confirm the cancer.

DISCUSSION

Upper limb lymphedema may be the presenting clinical feature of breast cancer. Breast cancer should be actively sought despite normal clinical and radiological findings. Breast MRI is required in this situation.

Syndrome des « grosses mains » des toxicomanes : intérêt des bandages peu élastiques

BACKGROUND

Puffy hand syndrome is a complication of intravenous drug abuse, which has no current available treatment. Arm and forearm edema are voluminous and cause functional and aesthetic disturbances. We report two cases successfully treated by low-stretch bandages.

OBSERVATIONS

A 40-year-old man and a 34-year-old woman, both intravenous drug users, with puffy hand syndrome were hospitalized for 11 days. Treatment included daily multilayer bandaging. Lymphedema volumes calculated by utilizing the formula for a truncated cone decreased by 16% on the left side and 12% on the right side for the first patient and 31 and 17% for the second. Hand circumference decreased 4.3 cm on the left side and 3.2 cm on the right side in case 1, and 2.5 cm and 1.9 cm respectively for case 2. The patients were taught self-bandaging techniques during their hospital stays. Elastic gloves were fitted at the end of treatment. Reduction of lymphedema volume remained stable after 18 months in one patient while for the second patient further treatment and hospitalization were required due to poor compliance.

DISCUSSION

The pathogenesis of this edema is probably multifactorial: venous, lymphatic insufficiency and the direct toxicity of injected drugs. Lymphedema treatment currently consists of low-stretch bandaging and wearing elastic garments, which is effective in decreasing the volume of puffy hand syndrome.

Effet délétère d’un acte chirurgical sur le volume d’un lymphœdème du membre supérieur après cancer du sein

OBJECTIVES

Secondary upper lymphedema occurs in 15 to 20% of patients after breast cancer treatment. Surgery may be required on lymphedematous limb. The aim of our study was to analyze the effects of surgery on lymphedema volume.

METHODS

Nine women with upper limb lymphedema after breast cancer treatment were recruited. Mean age at time of breast cancer was 45.6 +/- 8 years. Breast cancer was localized at right side and was treated with mammectomy (n=4), radiotherapy (n=8), chemotherapy (n=4) and antiestrogen (n=5). Mean duration of lymphedema before upper limb surgery was 10 years. Six patients reported one or more previous cellulitis. Surgery was indicated for carpal tunnel syndrome (n=6), forearm (n=2) or humeral (n=1) fracture. Lymphedema volume, calculated by the difference of volume between the lymphedematous and the contralateral arm, was compared before and after surgery.

RESULTS

Six patients had carpal tunnel release by transecting the transverse carpal ligament under local anesthesia with short total time tourniquet. Humeral and forearm fractures were treated with osteosynthesis. Before surgery, lymphedema volume of upper limb was 747 +/- 315 ml. Lymphedema management included low stretch bandages, elastic sleeve, manual lymph drainage. After 8 months follow up, lymphedema volume was significantly higher, 858 +/- 293 ml (p=0.012). Mean absolute variation of lymphedema volume was 111 ml (CI 95%: 32 to 109 ml), i.e. 15% of pre surgery lymphedema volume.

CONCLUSION

Surgery of carpal tunnel syndrome or osteosynthesis for fractures may lead to increased lymphedema volume in patients previously treated for breast cancer despite compressive therapy.