Surgical management of dysthyroid optic neuropathy: A systematic review.
JOURNAL OF STOMATOLOGY, ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY 2024;
125:101616. [PMID:
37666483 DOI:
10.1016/j.jormas.2023.101616]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2023] [Revised: 08/28/2023] [Accepted: 08/29/2023] [Indexed: 09/06/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE
There is currently no recommendation on the optimal surgical management for dysthyroid optic neuropathy (DON). The aim of this study is to systematically review the surgical management of DON and its outcome on visual acuity (VA).
DATA SOURCES
MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, and clinicaltrials.gov REVIEW METHODS: A systematic review of studies about the surgical management of DON was conducted according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. Articles were included if preoperative and postoperative VA in logMAR (Logarithm of the Minimum Angle of Resolution) were available.
RESULTS
Fifteen articles were included in the study accounting for 669 orbits. The mean VA improvement was of 0.44 logMAR overall, 0.41 logMAR for 1-wall, 0.41 logMAR for 2-wall, and 0.55 logMAR for 3-wall decompressions. The mean reduction in exophthalmos was 4.9 mm overall, 4.3 mm for 1-wall, 4.54 mm for 2-wall, and 6.02 for 3-wall decompressions. The mean new onset diplopia (NOD) rate was 19.84% overall, 19,12% for 1-wall, 20.75% for 2-wall, and 19.83% for 3-wall decompressions.
CONCLUSION
The results are limited due to the high number of biases in the included studies. It seems that 3-wall decompression offers the best VA improvement and proptosis reduction although also the highest NOD and complications rate. Two-wall balanced decompression or 1-wall inferomedial decompression seems to be effective with less morbidity.
Collapse