Jugular Vein-Mammary Artery Fistula after Catheterism for Hemodialysis: Case Report

The demographic characteristics of hemodialysis (HD) patients increase the need for the tunneled cuffed permanent catheter (TCC) as a definitive vascular access (VA) for HD. The internal jugular vein is increasingly being used as a route for TCC or temporary catheter placement and can be associated with serious complications. Among them other authors have described arteriovenous fistula (AVF) creation between the common carotid artery and the right jugular vein. We describe a case of an AVF between the right internal jugular vein and the right internal mammary artery. The fistula was detected during the TCC placement in a patient who underwent several jugular and subclavian catheterisms for HD in her clinical history.

Anticoagulation therapy for the prevention of hemodialysis tunneled cuffed catheters (TCC) thrombosis

BACKGROUND

Chronic oral anticoagulation is currently used to avoid thrombosis and the malfunction of tunneled cuffed catheters (TCCs) for hemodialysis (HD). The aim of the study was to assess the efficacy of early warfarin administration, after TCC placement, in comparison to its administration after the first thrombosis or malfunction event of the TCC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

One hundred and forty-four chronic dialysis patients, who underwent TCC placement between June 2001 and June 2005, were randomized into two groups: 81 patients, group A, started oral anticoagulation 12 hr after the TCC placement (target international normalized ratio (INR) 1.8-2.5), in association with ticlopidine 250 mg/die; 63 patients, group B, started warfarin after the first thrombosis/malfunction episode (target INR 1.8-2.5) in association with ticlopidine 250 mg/die. The efficacy of oral anticoagulation therapy in preventing TCC thrombotic complications was evaluated in a 12-month follow-up period, after TCC placement, in terms of: a) the number of patients with thrombotic-malfunction events; b) the number of thrombotic-malfunction events with urokinase infusion (events/patient/year); c) intradialytic blood flow rate (BFR, ml/min); d) negative blood pressure (BP) from the arterial line of the TCC (AP, mmHg); e) positive BP, in the extracorporeal circuit from the venous line (VP, mmHg); and f) bleeding complications.

RESULTS

Ten patients (12%) in group A showed TCC thrombosis/malfunction vs. 33 patients (52%) in group B (p < 0.01). In group A, 0.16 events of thrombosis/malfunction per patient/year vs. 1.65 in group B (p < 0.001) were ob-served. BFR was respectively 305 +/- 34 vs. 246 +/- 42 ml/min (p < 0.001). AP was -124 +/- 13 in group A vs. -174 +/- 21 mmHg in group B (p < 0.05). VP was 112 +/- 28 in group A vs. 168 +/- 41 mmHg in group B (p < 0.05). No patient showed any bleeding events.

CONCLUSIONS

Early warfarin therapy allows a significant reduction in TCC thrombotic complications and an improvement in both arterial and venous fluxes in comparison with the same therapy administered after the first TCC thrombotic/malfunction event. This therapy did not induce any bleeding complications in the patients included in the study.

Jugular vein-mammary artery fistula after catheterism for hemodialysis: case report

The demographic characteristics of hemodialysis (HD) patients increase the need for the tunneled cuffed permanent catheter (TCC) as a definitive vascular access (VA) for HD. The internal jugular vein is increasingly being used as a route for TCC or temporary catheter placement and can be associated with serious complications. Among them other authors have described arteriovenous fistula (AVF) creation between the common carotid artery and the right jugular vein. We describe a case of an AVF between the right internal jugular vein and the right internal mammary artery. The fistula was detected during the TCC placement in a patient who underwent several jugular and subclavian catheterisms for HD in her clinical history.

Combined Liver-Kidney Transplantation With Preformed Anti-HLA Antibodies: A Case Report

A pretransplant positive cross-match is a contraindication for kidney transplantation, unlike in liver transplantation (OLT). In combined liver kidney transplantation (LKT) it is hypothesized that liver can protect kidney from rejection. We report the case of a 35-year-old woman on renal replacement therapy with gastrointestinal tract compression due to a hematoma following spontaneous liver rupture (May 2004). She was affected by amyloidosis, treated with a bone marrow autotransplantation (2001). The liver rupture was surgically untreatable, so an LKT was proposed. Panel-reactive antibody was 80% to 100% (complement dependent cytotoxicity) with specific anti-HLA antibodies (enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay). A compatible donor was found (July 2004). The cross-match before LKT was positive for B and T cells (score 8): an emergency OLT was performed. Immediately after liver reperfusion the cross-match result was less positive (6) for T cells. After 6 hours it was negative for T and slightly positive for B cells (4): the kidney was transplanted. The immunosuppressive therapy was: alemtuzumab, steroids, and tacrolimus. Renal function immediately recovered. On day 7 a rejection episode was successfully treated by increasing steroids (intravenous bolus). At discharge hepatic and renal function were normal (creatinine 1 mg/dL). They are stable after 1 year. This case showed LKT efficacy even in complex immunological situations. Many immunological mechanisms, still not defined, are hypothesized about the protective role of the liver. This case confirmed experimental data that highlighted that in vivo in humans a cross-match can change from positive to negative after OLT giving highly sensitized patients the possibility for LKT.

[Therapy strategies in the prevention of chronic allograft nephropathy]

Chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN) is an anatomical and clinical alteration, characterized by proteinuria, hypertension and a progressive decline in kidney function, which begins at variable times (months, years) and can lead to the loss of the transplanted organ. CAN pathogenesis, which remains to be fully clarified, involves both immunological (early acute rejection, hyperimmunization, HLA-mismatches between donor and recipient, suboptimal immunosuppression, etc) and non-immunological factors (ischemia/reperfusion injury, reduced nephron mass, age differences between donor and recipient, dialysis time, hypertension, dislipidemia, proteinuria, etc). The possible prevention strategies for CAN consist of procedures aimed at the reduction of some potential risk factors: optimization of the conditions for organ explantation, diminution of ischemia/reperfusion injury, aggressive pharmacological treatment of acute rejection episodes, routine utilization of anti-hypertensive and hypolipidemic agents, and appropriate and rational immunosuppressive regimen. Moreover, some categories of immunosuppressive drugs, such as calcineurin inhibitors, can have a nephrotoxic effect, often regardless of therapeutic dosage. The introduction in clinical practice of novel immunosuppressive drugs with no nephrotoxicity, like mycophenolate mofetil and rapamycin, makes therapeutical strategies able to reduce the incidence of CAN feasible.