Evaluation of antihypertensives for post partum management of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

There is a lack of evidence that directly shows the best antihypertensive treatment options for post partum management of the hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. Our objective was to analyze the safest and most effective antihypertensive drugs post partum for patients with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy.

METHODS

PubMed, Cochrane, and MEDLINE were searched to find relevant articles published from inception to Feb 2024. We included randomized control trials, in English, featuring a population of postnatal women with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy or postpartum women with de novo hypertension with a follow-up of up to 6 months in which any antihypertensive medication was compared with Placebo or a comparison between different doses of antihypertensives was done. The statistical analyses were conducted using Review Manager with a random-effects model.

RESULTS

Our analysis revealed that almost all antihypertensives are effective in treating postpartum hypertension. However, some medications had alternating roles in controlling specific outcomes. Using calcium channel blockers resulted in a faster time to sustain BP control than the control (SMD: -0.37; 95% CI: -0.73 to -0.01; P = 0.04). In contrast, using ACE inhibitors or ARBs demanded the use of other antihypertensives in contrast to all other drugs assessed (RR: 2.09; 95% CI: 1.07 to 4.07; P = 0.03).

CONCLUSION

Timely management of the hypertensive disorders of pregnancy postpartum is life-saving. All the traditional antihypertensives we assessed effectively manage hypertension postpartum, thus allowing the physician to tailor the particular drug regimen according to the patient's needs and comorbidities without any hindrance.

Odds of HIV among incarcerated drug users: a systematic review and meta-analysis of Asian countries

Background

HIV makes up a large portion of infectious diseases globally. People injecting drugs in prisons are at high risk for contracting HIV infection. Prisons house ~10.2 million people globally, making them a high-risk setting for HIV transmission. This systematic review summarizes the available data on the odds of developing HIV infection among imprisoned people who inject drugs (PWIDs) in Asian regions.

Methods

The authors electronically assessed published studies from January, 2000 to December, 2022, including studies that investigated the odds of HIV in imprisoned PWIDs. We extensively searched PubMed, ERIC, and Cochrane Central and Google Scholar with no constraints in language or time. All the observational studies evaluating the chances of HIV in Asian prisoners with an exposure group of PWIDs and a control group of non-injecting-drug users were included in our analysis.

Results

The databases search yielded 254 potential studies, 10 observational studies of which having a total of 17 333 participants were included. A low or moderate risk of bias was reported in all the studies except one case-control. The pooled analysis showed a significant association between PWIDs and the chances of contracting HIV infection (Odds ratio=6.40; 95% CI=3.89-10.52; P<0.00001; I2=53%).

Conclusion

This study found a vital correlation between injecting-drug usage during imprisonment and HIV transmission speed. The results of this meta-analysis support the need to prevent HIV and conducting treatment programs in high-risk settings like prisons.

Efficacy of mindfulness-based intervention for the treatment of chronic headaches: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Mindfulness-based stress reduction/cognitive therapy has attained popularity as an adjunctive treatment for a plethora of medical and psychiatric conditions, however, its impact on chronic headaches is inconclusive. This review aims to assess the impact of MBSR/MBCT in alleviating the symptoms of chronic headaches.

Data sources and data selection

PubMed and Cochrane CENTRAL were searched from inception till 1st May 2021. Randomized Control Trials evaluating mindfulness-based stress reduction/cognitive therapy with either passive comparators (usual care) or active comparators (e.g., Health education or cognitive behavioral therapy) for chronic headaches (Migraine, Tension-type, or cluster headaches), which evaluated either headache frequency, pain intensity or headache duration as primary outcome were eligible for inclusion. The Risk of Bias was evaluated using the Cochrane Collaboration's Risk of Bias Tool.

Results

A total of ten Randomized Controlled Trials (five on migraine; three on tension-type; two with mixed samples) were evaluated. In comparison to usual care, mindfulness-based stress reduction/cognitive therapy did not illustrate significant changes in headache frequency (MD = −0.14; 95% CI -1.26 to 0.97; P = 0.80; Moderate Certainty), headache duration (MD = −0.27; 95% CI -3.51 to 2.97, P = 0.87; Low Certainty) or pain intensity (MD = −0.19; 95% CI -0.46 to 0.07; P = 0.15; Moderate Certainty)

Conclusion

The results found are insignificant for the three primary outcomes, which may be due to the low number of participants and often a high or unclear risk of bias in the randomized control trials included. Perhaps more aggressive clinical trials with a larger sample size effectively demonstrate differences in outcomes before and after therapy for MBSR/MBCT could provide a more significant change.

•

Mindfulness-based therapy for treatment of chronic headache.

•

Mindfulness vs usual care for treating patients with chronic headache.

•

Effect of different mindfulness-based techniques over headache frequency, intensity and duration.

•

Efficacy of Mindfulness-based therapy in achieving mindfulness in pts with chronic headache.